...that Redmond is as at least cheap and as secure as its open-source rival...
You took the right sentence, but gave the wrong reactions.
They no more want to prove that linux suxx, or its insecure, or that windoze is more secure or better. Nope. They want to show that win* is at least so secure as... got it?:)
...and eMacs hide the computer inside the monitor base...
Wow, that must be some new feature. Kitchen sink, OK. But hiding things in the monitor base... those emacs guys must be on some hard stuff..
charlie@marvin:~$ dpkg -l | grep emacs ii emacsen-common 1.4.15 Common facilities for all emacsen. ii xemacs21 21.4.15-1 Editor and kitchen sink ii xemacs21-bases 2004.02.02-1 Editor and kitchen sink -- compiled elisp su ii xemacs21-bin 21.4.15-1 Editor and kitchen sink -- support binaries ii xemacs21-mule 21.4.15-1 Editor and kitchen sink -- Mule binary ii xemacs21-mules 2004.02.02-1 Editor and kitchen sink -- Mule elisp suppor ii xemacs21-suppo 21.4.15-1 Editor and kitchen sink -- architecture inde charlie@marvin:~$
or mirroring disks: cat
that win* is at least so secure as
got it?
Oh ya'll huns always missing the point
--
*kacsint*
Wow, that must be some new feature. Kitchen sink, OK. But hiding things in the monitor base... those emacs guys must be on some hard stuff..
charlie@marvin:~$ dpkg -l | grep emacs
ii emacsen-common 1.4.15 Common facilities for all emacsen.
ii xemacs21 21.4.15-1 Editor and kitchen sink
ii xemacs21-bases 2004.02.02-1 Editor and kitchen sink -- compiled elisp su
ii xemacs21-bin 21.4.15-1 Editor and kitchen sink -- support binaries
ii xemacs21-mule 21.4.15-1 Editor and kitchen sink -- Mule binary
ii xemacs21-mules 2004.02.02-1 Editor and kitchen sink -- Mule elisp suppor
ii xemacs21-suppo 21.4.15-1 Editor and kitchen sink -- architecture inde
charlie@marvin:~$