Funny that you don't mention Bob Creamer in your comment, or any of the dozen or so people seeding provocateurs into not just Trump gatherings but Sanders gatherings. You don't mention the people on campuses shutting down speeches, visits, and gatherings for people who are conservative leaning. Being "alt-Right" is not an excuse to deny someone's first amendment rights. These are not one time gigs, but on Campuses have been going for years and for the election over a year.
Also consider that the only candidate to have someone actively attempt to assassinate them was Trump, when a whacko attempted to steal a gun from a guards belt to shoot at him.
If you actually recognize those real events, you would understand that someone behaving oddly would be at least suspicious. If he was reaching into his jacket pocket to get a phone and looked that far out of place you bet your ass people would think and perhaps say "gun".
Now consider the massive amount of emails found on Weiner's laptop and what we know the NYPD was investigating. Not just child pornography, but trafficking. Podesta being invited to events most people would say are occultist. How many politicians are going to be implicated by Weiner's laptop? I'm sure there are plenty of politicians worried right now. People who find information outside of the politically controlled media are, and should be, on high alert. Citations should not be needed, you know damn well how to perform Google searches and type search terms into Wikileaks. The UK has very recent examples of Government involvement in sex trafficking and pedophilia at massive scale. Politics is not immune to corruption, it attracts it.
Trump letting people know that they can LEGALLY change an early vote is not wrong. It's legal. Not only that, but it's worth nothing to people who probably didn't know it was LEGAL. Compared to DNC coolest guy Bob Creamer funding busing of minority groups for money across State lines to vote ILLEGALLY is so offensive it can only be described as idiocy.
Of course you are anonymous because we would all be able to peg Shill accounts by name. I'm guessing the DNC is paying you to post, and paying you from a different country.
Is Google under an obligation to be neutral when it comes to politics?
No, but they do have an obligation to inform people that they are biasing information to support a person they like. This is the current issue most people have with all of media. Journalism is dead and NOBODY is being held to any standards. Google providing search results is exactly journalism and should hold the same standards Journalists should hold. They don't, and they don't.
Did you attempt to do the search yourself? How about instead of claiming unfair, you actually test things yourself. Google code is proprietary so we can not study the inner workings on the Google servers, but countless people including myself tested the search with the same result.
No, I don't think everyone gets new things off the assembly line. Not only am I an Army Vet, I spent 10 years building the computer systems used to design, engineer, and upgrade most US Military vehicles. The Bradley had built in vision systems, you would not hang a go-pro off the side to replace it. You hung crap off the side, but nothing was mission critical because you know what happens to vehicles in normal run mode let alone combat. The Ukrainian military is running mostly T72s and some T80s. You are not going to drill holes in the tank and hang homemade gear on it.
Yeah, they probably won't use Wifi and a Signal would be hard to maintain even from a few inches away. That aside, did you ever notice that tanks lack wired gear hanging outside? Don't you think there is a reason for this feat of Engineering not to have wired components hanging outside? 60-75tons of metal bouncing around over and through tough terrain should immediately give you a clue why nobody uses any such technology.
US vehicles using cameras have them built in to the armor design, not added after the fact. Drilling holes in armor is a really dumb idea, and leads to weak spots.
Quite a bit off with your statements.
1. Huma already testified that she sent _every_ email sent to Clinton to her Yahoo account. She did so because in her own words "it made it easy to print". She also testified that she hand carried a burn bag and often left it in her car unattended.
2. There are already numerous leaks saying that the emails are not just copies of those "to: Hillary" but mail sent "from: Hillary". Multiple accounts is likely, that does not make it less detrimental to Hillary. In fact it may make it much more detrimental to her and remove any doubt regarding intent.
3. An offline deadman's switch would require constant updates. Activity that would be easier to pick up by other actors. Remember, these people are not stupid. Huma excusing herself to powder her nose with a laptop too many times would certainly raise suspicions. There may also be an offline cache, but the online cache is still much more likely. These people are being investigated for a steady stream of crimes, not a one time crime and coverup.
The FBI has the devices of most people currently under investigation. Weiner's cache of 650,000 emails is most likely a full dump of every Clinton email received given the number. If you don't understand the reason for holding those you have no sense of being part of a criminal conspiracy and the need to protect yourself from other party members.
There are plenty of facts to be had to indict not just Clinton, but a large number of people from the Democratic Party, numerous PACs, the DOJ, the State Department, and possibly members of the executive staff. The fact that the DOJ has been actively suppressing information is being undermined by Wikileaks, and pressed by the members of Intelligence agencies who have integrity.
We all know the legal game of plausible deniability. "We didn't know Bob and Mary were skimming keys." ends any legal challenge you pose for violating their policy. Hell, that works for breaking actual laws nowadays.
Simple statement to recognize a troll: "Remember, unfettered Capitalism is Fascism." which simply means you do not know what Capitalism is. No point reading after that piece of ignorance.
At this point there are no other options. Trump not doing what he says and being a Democrat in office will result in the civil war we don't really want to have. You can say "fake" all you want while it's conjecture, I'll say "fake" when I see it's fake. I'm as critical of liars on either side of the aisle.
I was intentionally general in my comment, but yes she was _caught_ twice, and lied about it both times. Public distrust of CNN and failing ratings is why any action was taken. Ex CIA agent Anderson Cooper is surely innocent of helping Brazil get the questions he was posing. Oh, did I just give people reason to doubt Cooper's loyalty to journalistic integrity? Oops
Stop trying to justify propaganda and propagandists. Schmidt has used the platform to attempt to sway the election. The same thing Twitter and Facebook have done, as well as main stream media. People are sick of it, and we can see the game being played all over.
Google performing "Science" would require UNBIASED positioning, not purely biased in favor of Democrats. You can not by definition perform science with a one sided bias.
Google search for months has provided biased results in search results and pre-fetching strings. Typing in "How do I vote" showed "For Hillary" as the top search entry for months, and Donald Trump did not show in the search results even if you typed in "for Donald" or "for Trump".
I get it, you Progressive Leftists hate losing. You don't care that Donna Brazil is empty of morality and has no problem cheating as long as the candidate the party oligarchs wants is elected. The only reason she was fired from CNN was that she got caught, not that she was devoid of ethics. No problem with scum like Bob Creamer sending provocateurs to Sanders and Trump rallies because it makes their candidate look better and opponents look bad. That scumbag had 340+ visits to the White House and 50 visits with the President, and you refuse to question how much the President actually knows about the corruption. You have no problem with the Attorney General meeting a potential witness and husband of the subject of 18 separate USCs days before her Directory of the FBI decided not to allow prosecution of any charges, and have not demanded that the AG step down for malfeasance.
You don't have a problem with it, but a huge number of the Public does. We do not support corrupt oligarchs and have no illusions that we somehow benefit from them. Trump burning down a huge portion of a corrupt Government is a solid option at this point. The alternative is to have a civil war, which we should all agree would be very bad for all of us.
Specialties are important. Depends on what GP wants to do for a while. Specialties are easier for older programmers to pick up, but to be good there is always lots to learn.
The F35 does not, nor will it, top the A-10. Fast movers are fine for hit and run jobs, but close air support requires lingering time. The A-10 has plenty of linger and scares the F*$^ out of enemies. If you are ever in combat you want 2 things on the battlefield with you. A-10s and Apaches.
Facebook promotes censorship, it does not protect speech. In fact they have been reported by former employees of censorship. Just like Twitter and Google, they are in the bag as propagandists, not outlets for free speech.
If you censor political opinions, why would you not allow other forms of censorship? It should be obvious that free speech is not a concern in one case, so would not be a concern in others. Oh, they may make phony claims that they care but that is simply to prevent people from abandoning the platform and finding/inventing other mediums.
The USA today is nowhere near the USA of the WW2 era. Freedom and Liberty have given way to Socialist doctrine, PC police, and a perception by most of the public that facts are whatever soundbite media gives you.
This is not the USA I want, and absolutely not the USA I grew up in.
Women already make up nearly 60% of all college graduates. They already receive favoritism for things like financial aid, grants, and scholarships (except for sports). There are TV ads, commercials, and companies doing everything they can to get more women into STEM and it is all failing. So what, coercion and extortion are not working so we panic?
People should stop trying to bully people into a field and forcing an ideology that people simply don't want. There is equal opportunity, in fact it's white males who today are treated like shit by politicians, academics, and media and every other racial group and gender is receiving preferences.
Also, people in general need to stop pretending like biological differences don't matter. They do, and facts matter.
Slashdot Mirror
Funny that you don't mention Bob Creamer in your comment, or any of the dozen or so people seeding provocateurs into not just Trump gatherings but Sanders gatherings. You don't mention the people on campuses shutting down speeches, visits, and gatherings for people who are conservative leaning. Being "alt-Right" is not an excuse to deny someone's first amendment rights. These are not one time gigs, but on Campuses have been going for years and for the election over a year.
Also consider that the only candidate to have someone actively attempt to assassinate them was Trump, when a whacko attempted to steal a gun from a guards belt to shoot at him.
If you actually recognize those real events, you would understand that someone behaving oddly would be at least suspicious. If he was reaching into his jacket pocket to get a phone and looked that far out of place you bet your ass people would think and perhaps say "gun".
Now consider the massive amount of emails found on Weiner's laptop and what we know the NYPD was investigating. Not just child pornography, but trafficking. Podesta being invited to events most people would say are occultist. How many politicians are going to be implicated by Weiner's laptop? I'm sure there are plenty of politicians worried right now. People who find information outside of the politically controlled media are, and should be, on high alert. Citations should not be needed, you know damn well how to perform Google searches and type search terms into Wikileaks. The UK has very recent examples of Government involvement in sex trafficking and pedophilia at massive scale. Politics is not immune to corruption, it attracts it.
Trump letting people know that they can LEGALLY change an early vote is not wrong. It's legal. Not only that, but it's worth nothing to people who probably didn't know it was LEGAL. Compared to DNC coolest guy Bob Creamer funding busing of minority groups for money across State lines to vote ILLEGALLY is so offensive it can only be described as idiocy.
Of course you are anonymous because we would all be able to peg Shill accounts by name. I'm guessing the DNC is paying you to post, and paying you from a different country.
Is Google under an obligation to be neutral when it comes to politics?
No, but they do have an obligation to inform people that they are biasing information to support a person they like. This is the current issue most people have with all of media. Journalism is dead and NOBODY is being held to any standards. Google providing search results is exactly journalism and should hold the same standards Journalists should hold. They don't, and they don't.
Did you attempt to do the search yourself? How about instead of claiming unfair, you actually test things yourself. Google code is proprietary so we can not study the inner workings on the Google servers, but countless people including myself tested the search with the same result.
No, I don't think everyone gets new things off the assembly line. Not only am I an Army Vet, I spent 10 years building the computer systems used to design, engineer, and upgrade most US Military vehicles. The Bradley had built in vision systems, you would not hang a go-pro off the side to replace it. You hung crap off the side, but nothing was mission critical because you know what happens to vehicles in normal run mode let alone combat. The Ukrainian military is running mostly T72s and some T80s. You are not going to drill holes in the tank and hang homemade gear on it.
Yeah, they probably won't use Wifi and a Signal would be hard to maintain even from a few inches away. That aside, did you ever notice that tanks lack wired gear hanging outside? Don't you think there is a reason for this feat of Engineering not to have wired components hanging outside? 60-75tons of metal bouncing around over and through tough terrain should immediately give you a clue why nobody uses any such technology.
US vehicles using cameras have them built in to the armor design, not added after the fact. Drilling holes in armor is a really dumb idea, and leads to weak spots.
Next question!
Quite a bit off with your statements.
1. Huma already testified that she sent _every_ email sent to Clinton to her Yahoo account. She did so because in her own words "it made it easy to print". She also testified that she hand carried a burn bag and often left it in her car unattended.
2. There are already numerous leaks saying that the emails are not just copies of those "to: Hillary" but mail sent "from: Hillary". Multiple accounts is likely, that does not make it less detrimental to Hillary. In fact it may make it much more detrimental to her and remove any doubt regarding intent.
3. An offline deadman's switch would require constant updates. Activity that would be easier to pick up by other actors. Remember, these people are not stupid. Huma excusing herself to powder her nose with a laptop too many times would certainly raise suspicions. There may also be an offline cache, but the online cache is still much more likely. These people are being investigated for a steady stream of crimes, not a one time crime and coverup.
The FBI has the devices of most people currently under investigation. Weiner's cache of 650,000 emails is most likely a full dump of every Clinton email received given the number. If you don't understand the reason for holding those you have no sense of being part of a criminal conspiracy and the need to protect yourself from other party members.
There are plenty of facts to be had to indict not just Clinton, but a large number of people from the Democratic Party, numerous PACs, the DOJ, the State Department, and possibly members of the executive staff. The fact that the DOJ has been actively suppressing information is being undermined by Wikileaks, and pressed by the members of Intelligence agencies who have integrity.
You are going to blow the narrative!
We all know the legal game of plausible deniability. "We didn't know Bob and Mary were skimming keys." ends any legal challenge you pose for violating their policy. Hell, that works for breaking actual laws nowadays.
Simple statement to recognize a troll: "Remember, unfettered Capitalism is Fascism." which simply means you do not know what Capitalism is. No point reading after that piece of ignorance.
I did not check more than a couple, but the few domains I checked returned blank pages with no content.
At this point there are no other options. Trump not doing what he says and being a Democrat in office will result in the civil war we don't really want to have. You can say "fake" all you want while it's conjecture, I'll say "fake" when I see it's fake. I'm as critical of liars on either side of the aisle.
I was intentionally general in my comment, but yes she was _caught_ twice, and lied about it both times. Public distrust of CNN and failing ratings is why any action was taken. Ex CIA agent Anderson Cooper is surely innocent of helping Brazil get the questions he was posing. Oh, did I just give people reason to doubt Cooper's loyalty to journalistic integrity? Oops
I was thinking "too little too late", but yours is funnier.
I believe GP and my opinion are closer than I first took the post, so "you" should be be used as a generalization if that is true.
Stop trying to justify propaganda and propagandists. Schmidt has used the platform to attempt to sway the election. The same thing Twitter and Facebook have done, as well as main stream media. People are sick of it, and we can see the game being played all over.
Google performing "Science" would require UNBIASED positioning, not purely biased in favor of Democrats. You can not by definition perform science with a one sided bias.
Google search for months has provided biased results in search results and pre-fetching strings. Typing in "How do I vote" showed "For Hillary" as the top search entry for months, and Donald Trump did not show in the search results even if you typed in "for Donald" or "for Trump".
I get it, you Progressive Leftists hate losing. You don't care that Donna Brazil is empty of morality and has no problem cheating as long as the candidate the party oligarchs wants is elected. The only reason she was fired from CNN was that she got caught, not that she was devoid of ethics. No problem with scum like Bob Creamer sending provocateurs to Sanders and Trump rallies because it makes their candidate look better and opponents look bad. That scumbag had 340+ visits to the White House and 50 visits with the President, and you refuse to question how much the President actually knows about the corruption. You have no problem with the Attorney General meeting a potential witness and husband of the subject of 18 separate USCs days before her Directory of the FBI decided not to allow prosecution of any charges, and have not demanded that the AG step down for malfeasance.
You don't have a problem with it, but a huge number of the Public does. We do not support corrupt oligarchs and have no illusions that we somehow benefit from them. Trump burning down a huge portion of a corrupt Government is a solid option at this point. The alternative is to have a civil war, which we should all agree would be very bad for all of us.
It's not me claiming that the F35 should replace the A10, that is the DOD and Politicians.
Specialties are important. Depends on what GP wants to do for a while. Specialties are easier for older programmers to pick up, but to be good there is always lots to learn.
The F35 does not, nor will it, top the A-10. Fast movers are fine for hit and run jobs, but close air support requires lingering time. The A-10 has plenty of linger and scares the F*$^ out of enemies. If you are ever in combat you want 2 things on the battlefield with you. A-10s and Apaches.
The F18 is much newer. About the time executives started making all of the engineering decisions.
If you don't understand how two similar immoral acts relate to character you have no right to call other people names.
Facebook promotes censorship, it does not protect speech. In fact they have been reported by former employees of censorship. Just like Twitter and Google, they are in the bag as propagandists, not outlets for free speech.
If you censor political opinions, why would you not allow other forms of censorship? It should be obvious that free speech is not a concern in one case, so would not be a concern in others. Oh, they may make phony claims that they care but that is simply to prevent people from abandoning the platform and finding/inventing other mediums.
The USA today is nowhere near the USA of the WW2 era. Freedom and Liberty have given way to Socialist doctrine, PC police, and a perception by most of the public that facts are whatever soundbite media gives you.
This is not the USA I want, and absolutely not the USA I grew up in.
Women already make up nearly 60% of all college graduates. They already receive favoritism for things like financial aid, grants, and scholarships (except for sports). There are TV ads, commercials, and companies doing everything they can to get more women into STEM and it is all failing. So what, coercion and extortion are not working so we panic?
People should stop trying to bully people into a field and forcing an ideology that people simply don't want. There is equal opportunity, in fact it's white males who today are treated like shit by politicians, academics, and media and every other racial group and gender is receiving preferences.
Also, people in general need to stop pretending like biological differences don't matter. They do, and facts matter.