Slashdot Mirror
Secret Service, DHS Scramble To Secure America's Election (yahoo.com)
Secret service agents rushed Donald Trump off a stage in Nevada Saturday night, CNN reports. "A scuffle could be seen breaking out in the audience, but it was not immediately clear what happened... Secret Service and police tactical units rushed in to detain a man [who] was then rushed by a throng of police officers, Secret Service agents and SWAT officers armed with assault rifles to a side room... A law enforcement official told CNN no weapon was discovered. The GOP nominee was apparently unharmed and returned to the stage minutes later to finish his speech." Meanwhile, an anonymous reader writes:
"All but two U.S. states have accepted help from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to probe and scan voter registration and election systems for vulnerabilities, a department official told Reuters." Ohio is relying on the National Guard's cyber protection unit, while Arizona says they've held discussions with the FBI, DHS and state-level agents on cyber security. But in addition, "U.S. military hackers have penetrated Russia's electric grid, telecommunications networks and the Kremlin's command systems, making them vulnerable to attack by secret American cyber weapons should the U.S. deem it necessary, according to a senior intelligence official and top-secret documents reviewed by NBC News."
American officials believe Russian hacking efforts will continue through 2018, according to the Wall Street Journal. "By hacking and dumping emails, Russia is trying 'to denigrate the American electoral system, to make it look chaotic, make it look manipulable, make it look subject to intrusion, cheating and vulnerable so you can't trust it...to make us look no better than the Russian electoral system,'" said one senior White House official. Russia is also expected to extend their efforts toward elections in Europe.
American officials believe Russian hacking efforts will continue through 2018, according to the Wall Street Journal. "By hacking and dumping emails, Russia is trying 'to denigrate the American electoral system, to make it look chaotic, make it look manipulable, make it look subject to intrusion, cheating and vulnerable so you can't trust it...to make us look no better than the Russian electoral system,'" said one senior White House official. Russia is also expected to extend their efforts toward elections in Europe.
So close...
So, this would-be Dietrich Bonhoeffer turned out to be just a Republican with a sign. He has been released by the Secret Service. There was never a threat to Mr Trump.
But I did notice that when Trump minced off the stage with the Secret Service the bone spurs that kept him out of the draft didn't seem to be bothering him.
You are welcome on my lawn.
... that said "Republicans Against Trump", and then some unidentified asshole yelled "gun!" and the crowd went wild - hope they find the asshole that yelled "Fire in a crowded theater" just for the hell of it, and hang his ass.
It doesn't help that someone shouted "gun" when the protester stood up with a sign.
A Secret Service spokesperson said in a statement that an "unidentified individual" shouted "gun" in the audience, though no weapon was found after a "thorough search."
Arizona
Since at least in the Netherlands (and presumably in the rest of Europe) we don't use electronic voting and we require voter ID.
with guns just askin' questions like "Who's voting for Crooked Hillary?". And you wonder why the Dems have higher rates of early & by mail voting. I'm a Dem and I won't be within 500 yards of a polling place on Tuesday if my life depended on it. In fact, I'm pretty sure it's the opposite...
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Hillary is going to make you get GAY MARRIED! She's controlling your election and your ERECTION! She's going to make you HARD GAY!
The intellectuals, the technicians, the business people, even the nobility, have disentangled themselves from the and generally dampened the effects of the vote on themselves and even partake in the vote-selling for a little extra cash for that cool intellectually-pleasing bauble. Either that or engage in vote buying of their own directed at the candidate that promises them the coolest baubles. They aren't immune from wanting to pad their own accounts and believing that this is the best way to come out a little more ahead than they would previously.
I have little sympathy for Trump. I read CIA Chiefs Haydens assessment of Trump (basically calling a Putin stooge), and since Hayden was CIA chief during many of the claims he's making (and thus knew more than he can publicly disclose), when he hints the guy is basically a Putin puppet, he's probably hinting at far worse.
It's the politicial equivalent of 'lighting up' a target. In this case sticking a big "traitor" signpost on Trump. That would resonate hard with Republican loyal to their country not to Trump.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/former-cia-chief-trump-is-russias-useful-fool/2016/11/03/cda42ffe-a1d5-11e6-8d63-3e0a660f1f04_story.html
He pointed out Paul Manafort, his campaign chief was PR consultant to Russia's puppet leader in Ukraine, Viktor Yanokovych and Carter Page with deep ties to Russian oil, gas and money.
He all but called him a liar, quoting Trumps' "no business investments in Russia" and his sons 2008 admission that most “Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets".
"Trump also echoes Putin when it comes to Syria and the Islamic State, or ISIS. Here he follows the Moscow line that we and the Russians have common purpose and that Russia and Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad (and Iran) are “killing ISIS.”"
"Actually, they are not. They are bucking up the Assad regime that, if anyone is keeping score, has killed more innocents than the Islamic State and Jabhat al-Nusra, the al-Qaeda affiliate, have combined. And the attractiveness of the Islamic State and al-Qaeda to Sunni Muslims is a direct byproduct of the depredations of the Assad regime — the regime that Russia saved from collapse a year ago."
i.e. working with US enemies to undermine Americas position.
All but two U.S. states have accepted help from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
I would much rather have someone that I trust helping than the D.H.S.
I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
In N.C. the feds struck down our law to require ID because it discriminated against those wanting to commit voter fraud.
I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
Yes, secure the election. We wouldn't want rampant cheating to make us look even more like a banana republic.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/the-fix/wp/2016/02/02/heres-just-how-unlikely-hillary-clintons-6-for-6-coin-toss-victories-were/?client=safari
In your dreams. 538 has him at 35% probability of winning as I write this;
And that's only naively counting the electoral college. You think they are going to let Trump-the-Pussygrabber onto the highest seat in the land? Not likely. How many Republican party luminaries have already stated "country over party" and refused to back Trump? This many! This election is the perfect excuse for the electors to vote their consciences. If they need tom which is doubtful.
And then there's a disparity in the women's vote: currently standing near 50% in favor of Clinton.
There's no way Trump can win. None. You're just fooling yourself. Enjoy it while you can, because come Wednesday morning, we'll have a woman in the white house. And Washington will go on just as it always has, Republicans blocking every bit of progress they can, democrats fumbling around in a non-unified manner, and idiots like the tea partiers throwing monkey wrenches in everywhere they can, and all the while the lobbyists will be proffering handfuls of money to everyone in sigh, the president not fulfilling a plugged nickle's worth of the promises made on the campaign trail.
You come back here Wednesday, you'll see I called it exactly. If you can find this post after the load of butt-hurt moderation falls on it, lol
But in addition, "U.S. military hackers have penetrated Russia's electric grid, telecommunications networks and the Kremlin's command systems, making them vulnerable to attack by secret American cyber weapons should the U.S. deem it necessary, according to a senior intelligence official and top-secret documents reviewed by NBC News."
Is it just me, or does anyone else think that this is insane?
Assange never gives out details about who his leakers are, but even he took the time to state categorically that the Podesta leakers are did not come from the Russian government.
Clearly he feels that there is some danger here for him to take this extraordinary step.
Instead of setting up a hair-trigger response shouldn't we first have an investigation, and then approach this through diplomatic channels?
Ye gods, Putin has to keep the appearance of strength in his country. What do you think he'll do if we start messing with their electrical grid?
And in other news, we have Obama encouraging illegals to vote, which would appear at first glance to be Obama committing a felony on camera.
What the fuck is happening to this country?
Learn what exactly, that fit the alt-right, black lives don't matter?
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
"By hacking and dumping emails, Russia is trying 'to denigrate the American electoral system, to make it look chaotic, make it look manipulable, make it look subject to intrusion, cheating and vulnerable so you can't trust it...to make us look no better than the Russian electoral system,'" said one senior White House official.
"Hacking and dumping" emails is not the same as changing vote counts or forcing people to vote a certain way. The exposure of the content of emails was likely embarrassing to the Democratic Party and HRC, but it isn't election tampering.
You want to prevent all hacking? Just use paper ballots counted at the precinct level. India has a billion people and it works just fine. Our election is important enough that it's foolish to trust it to unauditable, easily hacked voting machines when the alternative of hand counting is not that hard.
Is completely incoherent. There's probably three separate headlines here but it was all jammed into one paragraph.
What a lie.
* In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia region, Obama received 100% of the votes with not even a single vote recorded for Romney. (A mathematical and statistical impossibility).
* In 21 districts in Wood County Ohio, Obama received 100% of the votes where GOP inspectors were illegally removed from their polling locations - and not one single vote was recorded for Romney. (Another statistical impossibility).
* In Wood County Ohio, 106,258 voted in a county with only 98,213 eligible voters .
* In St. Lucie County, FL, there were 175,574 registered eligible voters but 247,713 votes were cast.
* The National SEAL Museum, a polling location in St. Lucie County, FL had a 158% voter turnout.
* Palm Beach County, FL had a 141% voter turnout .
* In one Ohio County, Obama won by 108% of the total number of eligible voters .
NOTE: Obama won in every state that did not require a Photo ID and lost in every state that did require a Photo ID in order to vote .
I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
I wish some time we could get competent people in government.
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
Massage is done. After this election stunt, even if Ecuador let's him stay, he's brought Wikileaks disrepute that the press will ignore him. Snowden had taken his mantle.
Everything you've said is completely and totally bogus.
1) "Ecuador lets him stay": Ecuador has repeatedly reaffirmed their intention to let him stay, even after cutting his internet access.
2) "Disrepute": Wikileaks recently published the DKIM proofs for the Podesta E-mails, putting the lie to any claims of tampering. For example, Donna Brazile claimed that E-mails showing her giving debate questions to Clinton were tampered, but they were vetted using Google's gmail.com DKIM signature.
3) "Massage": Learn Engrish.
4) "Stunt": He's been publishing pretty-much continuously for 10 years, and you think "stunt" describes his actions?
5) "Press will ignore": Uh... yeah. Right. You think this is what will happen?
6) "Snowden": Snowden took his mantle... without being in the news or having done anything of recent significance?
In general, everything you said is simple sock-puppetry intended to sway uninformed people. It's intellectually dishonest, and it doesn't even promote the mainstream view.
I mean, really. Absolutely *no one* in the media is making any of your claims.
I'd ask for links, but in this case I don't think that's possible.
People have been complaining about electronic voting for nearly two decades! Suddenly HRC brings back McCarthyism/Red Scare like it's the 1950s and NOW it's a crisis? Give me a fucking break. The only reason the HRC/DHS/TPTB give a shit about election fraud is if they are concerned they can't fix the election!
i have a korean math teacher (cuz asians are good at math) and every time she says "election", it sounds like "erection". i lulz ever time i hear that and she doesn't understand why. lol.
How many of these 'crises' are either enormously exaggerated, or manufactured out of whole cloth? After all, they are so very useful for creating jobs, justifying power and autonomy grabs by various TLA's, and distracting the masses from noticing that their basic rights are being systematically torn down and burned.
Yes, by all means, protect this election. Protect it from becoming a third-rate reality show - a freaky, depraved, but strangely irrelevant spectacle that proudly and defiantly puts the 'circus' in 'bread and circuses'. Oh, wait... it's way too late for that.
I'm starting to see the attractions of the Libertarian point of view. It's delusional and naive, to be sure - but would it produce a hell any worse that what we're currently experiencing?
'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
Douglas Adams predicted this election, and probably most others, in his HHGTG series with this: It is a well known fact that those people who most want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. It is number 23 on the list. I don't know that number 42 on that particular list applies to this election, though.
that he's just concerned for my safety.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Trump's been encouraging a climate of violence and fear at his rallies for months' now. I'm just surprised this didn't happen sooner. The real thing to come out of this that'll hurt him is how he sorta hobbled away. Sure, he's 70, and to any sane person that's to be expected. But he's been cultivating an image of virility for months now and having it undermined in the press 3 days before game day is gonna be a problem.
I forget who said it but somebody said whoever can keep the spotlight off is gonna win since neither candidate is well liked. Trump just put the spotlight on 100%.
Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
Your one sides viewpoint is only exceeded by your lies, fraud, and slander.
We need to force all publications, writes, and even comments to have to identify if they receive ANY funding from any political party, PAC, lobbyist, or are anything bu presenting complete unbiased both sides information
They are scrambling to secure the election too late, the damage was already done before the general started. If they wanted to fix the damage done to this election, they would have to restart the primaries well. Fixing the issues at this stage in the game is like putting on a bulletproof vest after you have already been shot, the damage is done.
And as the wikileaks have shown with the DNC, Clinton, and the media all conspiring to sideline Sanders and prop up Trump for someone easier to beat along with all the voter issues around the nation with switched registrations and the California poll workers instructed to give Independents the wrong ballots so they couldn't vote for president along with all the stuff with the exist polls which are an indicator sign the US uses for election fraud even in other states. One way or another, whether it was at the ballot, the parties office, or the media conspiring. The primaries on the democratic side were effectively if not literally rigged.
And you don't need to rig a general election if you already rigged the primaries and got to control whom even made it into the general. Not matter which one lose at that point, you still win.
Lets face it, they have no intention on securing these elections or else they would restart them entirely at this point. This is all about saving their figurative face to the public.
obama regime blaming russia again for interference.
For fucks sake, every other country on earth can blame america for interfering into other people affairs, obama regime has as much credibility as a cocksucking car salesman...
the same question to BLM negroes and jihadists, not a single infidel blown up at hillarys rallies
Your words echo Trumpsky's denials but US Intelligence service says otherwise: http://www.theverge.com/2016/1...
Yeah, you know how US Intel has been known to lie, both on purpose and also on accident? I have absolutely no reason to believe them when they say 'trust us', especially when they are talking about starting a cyberwar.
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
So let me get this straight, they set up man in the middle attack servers, sent attack emails to DNC staff, intercepted emails for the election, and selectively leaked those to Julian Assange for a bit of Wikileaks innuendo attack.... to get their guy Trump into power. Yet they wouldn't hack election machines, counting machines or vote counters emails?
And you think that's "tech savvy"? And there are enough GOP and Putin astroturfers here to mod you to a +4?
That hacking DNC email, and using the intelligence in the email to get their puppet into power *ISN"T* election tampering???
If Russia was trying to put Clinton in power, you'd be screaming for the CIA to protect the election from Putin's tampering, instead you side with a foreign power simply because you think he's helping get your guy elected! Bad news he's not your guy, he's Putin's guy.
I very very very much doubt that this is the work of the russian government. Simply put, given all these emails, they would use them to better understand who is really in power, and then use them for blackmail. AFTER she became president. They wouldn't even blackmail her, but would blackmail some of the various players who wouldn't want these coming out.
.
What's to secure? Ariel Winter has already made it clear she despises Trump.
Any true patriot would follow her ass to any poll and follow her vote.
http://popminute.com/photo/1/ariel_winter_playboy_bunny_halloween2.jpg
Captcha: triple (nom)
Not "trust us", US intelligence has enumerate exactly how it was done, by whom, where and when. The current hacker going by Guccifer 2.0 was pretending to be Romanian, but when faced with a translator, was found to be Russian.
That's not much.
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
We supposedly hacked Russia? How fucking stupid are we? Time for Americans to leave the country - I don't want to get nuked.
Your words echo Trumpsky's denials but US Intelligence service says otherwise:
http://www.theverge.com/2016/1...
Wow, what a trustworthy source!
Remember when they kept trying to get people to believe that North Korea hacked Sony over a shitty movie? Remember when there was zero evidence of that happening or even being remotely possible? Remember when they quietly dropped it when the truth started coming out?
Some things I find disturbing:
"By hacking and dumping emails, Russia is trying 'to denigrate the American electoral system, to make it look chaotic, make it look manipulable, make it look subject to intrusion, cheating and vulnerable so you can't trust it...to make us look no better than the Russian electoral system,'" said one senior White House official. Russia is also expected to extend their efforts toward elections in Europe..."
Let me get this straight.
Even IF Russia was dumping Emails, and let me be clear...they are not...all of these Emails have been verified by FBI sources. Which, means, the democratic party has voters who do not care if their candidate is a treasonous criminal, the are voting for Hillary anyway.
Secondly:
"U.S. military hackers have penetrated Russia's electric grid, telecommunications networks and the Kremlin's command systems, making them vulnerable to attack by secret American cyber weapons should the U.S. deem it necessary, according to a senior intelligence official and top-secret documents reviewed by NBC News."
This is an act of war. Not on a goat herding nation that can't fight back. These VERY DESPERATE OLIGARCHS are trying to start a distraction from their criminal activities, and provoke a NUCLEAR POWER, that could wipe out the eastern seaboard in about 20 minutes.
No Russia is not Iraq, far from it.
These people kicked Napoleans ass, Hitlers ass while European fags cowered in their boots and some, Like the French surrenderd without even a fight in World War 2.
All of this activity by the US government is TREASON, they have no right to start a war without full authorization from Congress let alone attack another country either cyber or physically wise.
One more thing.
These Executive orders effectively has made the President a king. These have to be immediately reversed an stopped.
No individual branch of goverment has that sort of authority except congress with a majority vote of 2/3rds.
Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
"make it look chaotic, make it look manipulable, make it look subject to intrusion, cheating and vulnerable so you can't trust it"
In other words, make it look exactly like it is.
Russia is trying 'to denigrate the American electoral system, to make it look chaotic, make it look manipulable, make it look subject to intrusion, cheating and vulnerable so you can't trust it...
No need to do anything on that front. All of Europe has been laughing about the US voting process for decades. You've got the most complicated, error-prone, untrustworthy election system I personally have ever seen or heard about. The fact that you're incapable of fixing it is the best proof that the whole system is broken beyond repair.
I'm not just talking voting machines, I also mean Gerrymandering, the fact that you vote on a working day (seriously?) or that there are hour-long queues. You are holding elections the way 3rd world countries hold their first election in history, and it's just absolutely pathetic.
What could Russia possibly do to discredit this abomination? If I were the russian general in charge, I'd tell my hackers to stay out of this, lest they accidentally fix something and make it better.
Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
No but think about it, all this time they were worried about Obama coming for their guns, and Orange Hitler comes along and they're ready to just hand them over. What could that possibly reveal?
By hacking and dumping emails, Russia is trying 'to denigrate the American electoral system, to make it look chaotic, make it look manipulable, make it look subject to intrusion, cheating and vulnerable so you can't trust it...to make us look no better than the Russian electoral system.
I'm going out on a limb here, but wouldn't that impression be the actual truth? How the democrats rigged against Sanders, that apparently the Democrats and their candidat got hacked, we know for ages that voting machines are not trustworthy, there is the concept of gerrymandering, and how on earth became Trump even a candidate, not speaking about that the charges against Hillary were dropped.
Not sure whom to attribute those hacks, but isn't it actually a good thing, that this knowledge is now spread between the voters so they can make a more informed decision? Isn't it better to know what is going on than to life in fluffy unicorn land?
All the governments are always saying: No need to fear, if you have nothing to hide. Well...
If dumping emails can make the electoral system look "manipulable, vulnerable and subject to intrusion and cheating", then that's because it is manipulable, vulnerable and subject to intrusion and cheating. That fact was just concealed before.
You might want to check the Project Veritas video--we have people like Zulema Rodriguez to thank for those protests turning violent. And we can fact check that all the way back to her illegal actions at the AZ protest, lying to cops, and being on the Democratic payroll thanks to the FEC site. So you might be inclined to believe the people you don't like are violent, but we have videos that can be independently corroborated, as well as discussions in the Podesta email dump to tie it all together.
And there was also this guy who attempted to steal a gun: http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/19/...
So we can hardly rule out any sort of dirty tricks here, especially with Hillary's poll numbers taking a dive lately.
There were also fake pedophile smears against Julian (Todd & Claire) as well as Trump (Epstein has way more ties to Bill, and Podesta has a ton of pedo friends apparently, including the former Republican speaker/convicted child molester so one really wonders what *they* have in common...) with that lawsuit now being voluntarily dismissed after being debunked even by Jezebel, Popehat and many other sources.
You might want to check the Project Veritas video
James O'Keefe's is famous precisely for making videos dishonestly edited and presented to create fake scandals.
I'll watch his video on a scandal after I finish reviewing Bernie Madoff's report on my mutual funds.
And there was also this guy who attempted to steal a gun: http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/19/...
And a mentally ill guy from Britain has to do with what?
There were also fake pedophile smears against Julian (Todd & Claire) as well as Trump (Epstein has way more ties to Bill, and Podesta has a ton of pedo friends apparently, including the former Republican speaker/convicted child molester so one really wonders what *they* have in common...) with that lawsuit now being voluntarily dismissed after being debunked even by Jezebel, Popehat and many other sources.
Well we don't actually know the accusations against Trump were fake, they were damn sketchy but that doesn't mean they were fake.
I stole this Sig
"U.S. military hackers have penetrated Russia's electric grid, telecommunications networks and the Kremlin's command systems, making them vulnerable to attack by secret American cyber weapons should the U.S. deem it necessary, according to a senior intelligence official and top-secret documents reviewed by NBC News."
Only if the Russians are dumb enough to connect their SCADA systems directly to the Internet and run them on Microsoft Windows.
> James O'Keefe's is famous precisely for making videos dishonestly edited and presented to create fake scandals.
The video can be corroborated by a wealth of independent evidence as I discussed here: https://slashdot.org/firehose....
A few more bits of corroboration came out after that, but so much came out that I never got it linked up. I would also like to mention that the emails can be validated by DKIM, so nobody has been altering them.
> And a mentally ill guy from Britain has to do with what?
He attempted to steal a gun to shoot Trump. Just saying this isn't the first assassination scare. I think it's the 4th?
> Well we don't actually know the accusations against Trump were fake, they were damn sketchy but that doesn't mean they were fake.
You'd get better odds on a Royal Flush. An anonymous victim with anonymous witnesses for something that allegedly happened decades ago and involving a well-known pedophile (Epstein) where Bill Clinton took 20+ trips on his "Lolita Express" with several of those trips having no SS agents present. Yeah, lots of people were on that guy's plane but with Podesta being into that creepy as hell #spiritcooking crap, you have to kind of wonder.
P.S. here's a good summary of most of the Podesta email findings: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Don't need any hacking, they are already pre-hacked by their factory settings. And who owns the company providing voting computers? George Soros—a maniac hell-bent on shaping the world according to his own personal views. He bought what Sequoia Voting Systems purchased from Dominion company what they purchased from DieBold.
https://www.wired.com/2016/08/americas-voting-machines-arent-ready-election/
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/10/dont_sweat_soros_voting_machines.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_voting#Electronic_voting_manufacturers
First, I'm trying to understand why people think ANY level of fraud is ok.
Second, The President of the United States is on YouTube telling ILLEGAL aliens not to be scared to vote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCLO0WBvhF8
You'd get better odds on a Royal Flush. An anonymous victim with anonymous witnesses for something that allegedly happened decades ago and involving a well-known pedophile (Epstein) where Bill Clinton took 20+ trips on his "Lolita Express"
If you had confidence that Trump didn't fuck a child you wouldn't be mentioning Bill Clinton at all. That's handwaving bullshit. Pay no attention to the man we're actually talking about right now!
If you want an agreement that Bill Clinton is a squashed shit, here it is. But try to stay on topic, son.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
US intelligence has enumerate exactly how it was done, by whom, where and when.
So did Germany when a radio station on the border of Poland was attacked in 1939. It turned out to be staged by the Germans themselves, but the lie was good enough to justify the invasion of Poland.
Given the content of the post, I recommend that Slashdot ban EditorDavid. Two entirely different issues are being conflated with the headline:
Secret Service, DHS Scramble To Secure America's Election
One of which was a brutal beating of a man holding a sign by a group of Trump supporters.
This is amongst the worst cobbled together pieces that Slashdot has ever posted.
"By hacking and dumping emails, Russia is trying 'to denigrate the American electoral system, to make it look chaotic, make it look manipulable, make it look subject to intrusion, cheating and vulnerable so you can't trust it..."
US voting system untrustworthy? Surely not....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
I think he's saying Bill's pedo ties provide motive for the left to falsely accuse Trump. That's rule #1 of the left: always accuse your opponent of whatever you're doing.
We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
This election is a choice between the Plague and Cholera. Hillary will be a bit better short-term, but she will continue and cement the overall downwards-trend. Trump would be without doubt a catastrophe, but this may be a case of rather an end in tears than tears without end. The fact of the matter is that if these two are the best the US political landscape has to offer and who the voters are willing to vote for, then the country is already in a late phase of the decline and essentially doomed.
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
Trump letting people know that they can LEGALLY change an early vote is not wrong. It's legal. Not only that, but it's worth nothing to people who probably didn't know it was LEGAL. Compared to DNC coolest guy Bob Creamer funding busing of minority groups for money across State lines to vote ILLEGALLY is so offensive it can only be described as idiocy.
Of course you are anonymous because we would all be able to peg Shill accounts by name. I'm guessing the DNC is paying you to post, and paying you from a different country.
-The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.
First, I'm trying to understand why people think ANY level of fraud is ok.
The same reason we consider any level of crime to be more tolerable than eliminating it. The price of doing so is excessive compared to the result.
It's a rather common realization, and why we don't live in a police state.
Second, The President of the United States is on YouTube telling ILLEGAL aliens not to be scared to vote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCLO0WBvhF8
Ah, I guess you do think some level of fraud is ok.
You know, the level where you lie about what somebody said.
Either that, or you're dumb enough to fall for the hysterical misrepresentation of it.
That implies fighting. Not rounding on someone who was trying to protest, attacking him, pulling at his testicles and trying to choke him.
It's only a scuffle if he's fighting back, and not lying on the floor being beaten for protesting.
Funny that you don't mention Bob Creamer in your comment, or any of the dozen or so people seeding provocateurs into not just Trump gatherings but Sanders gatherings. You don't mention the people on campuses shutting down speeches, visits, and gatherings for people who are conservative leaning. Being "alt-Right" is not an excuse to deny someone's first amendment rights. These are not one time gigs, but on Campuses have been going for years and for the election over a year.
Also consider that the only candidate to have someone actively attempt to assassinate them was Trump, when a whacko attempted to steal a gun from a guards belt to shoot at him.
If you actually recognize those real events, you would understand that someone behaving oddly would be at least suspicious. If he was reaching into his jacket pocket to get a phone and looked that far out of place you bet your ass people would think and perhaps say "gun".
Now consider the massive amount of emails found on Weiner's laptop and what we know the NYPD was investigating. Not just child pornography, but trafficking. Podesta being invited to events most people would say are occultist. How many politicians are going to be implicated by Weiner's laptop? I'm sure there are plenty of politicians worried right now. People who find information outside of the politically controlled media are, and should be, on high alert. Citations should not be needed, you know damn well how to perform Google searches and type search terms into Wikileaks. The UK has very recent examples of Government involvement in sex trafficking and pedophilia at massive scale. Politics is not immune to corruption, it attracts it.
-The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.
the same question to BLM negroes ...
Please don't TLA Black Lives Matter to BLM.
Out here in the not-so-urban areas (where much of the pro-Trump people live) "BLM" is the Bureau of Land Management - a federal bureaucracy whose overreach is one of the major issues in the presidential politics this cycle.
The TLA is already in use, and recycling it for another actor in this drama causes initial misreading of posts that do this.
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
Remember when there was zero evidence of that happening or even being remotely possible? Remember when they quietly dropped it when the truth started coming out?
Actually I didn't know that part happened, so thanks for pointing it out.
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
If you had confidence that Trump didn't fuck a child you wouldn't be mentioning Bill Clinton at all. That's handwaving bullshit. Pay no attention to the man we're actually talking about right now!
That case was dropped. The people behind it have been trying to extort Trump for money the entire campaign (this was the third attempt at a lawsuit) and the anonymous accuser all of a sudden dropped off the face of the earth after failing to show up for a "tell-all press conference."
The whole "Trump had sex with a child" thing is pretty much conclusively debunked at this point.
Bill Clinton making frequent trips to "Sex Island" on the "Lolita Express" on the other hand? Those are pretty well conclusively proven.
I was at the Friday night Trump rally at Hershey PA - one of the 11,000 inside. The Secret Service ran the metal detectors in conjunction with the TSA. No guns were obvious except on the Secret Service themselves and local cops - everyone knows that you can't bring them into stadiums and arenas, so it doesn't happen.
I'm sure almost all of the attendees had (more than) one at home, though. Law abiding gun owners are only a problem for leftist pricks who want a totalitarian state.
HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
And maybe I won't snicker at your "Senior White House official's" boistrus stupidity.
Are there no guns allowed at Trump rallies?
Nevada allows guns even in casinos (concealed with a shall-issue (i.e, go through the hoops and they must issue it) permit). But federal law prohibits them in zones around people being bodyguarded by the Secret Service. Federal law trumps state law and this law hasn't been tested in court against the Second Amendment.
How did they get all those hillbillies to leave their guns at home?
In addition to being racist and intolerant of diverse cultures, this use of "hillbillies" is incorrect, and displays your provincialism. The term applies to people in portions of the Appalachian mountain range, on the opposite side of the continent and more than 2,000 miles away from both the Sierras (where Reno is located) or the (somewhat more eastward) Rockies.
If you really want to flame the people of Nevada, try "cowboys". (Also Indians: A substantial fraction of the local population and culture happen to be members of, or descended from, one of the several local tribes.)
Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
Jitters?
https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
> If you had confidence that Trump didn't fuck a child you wouldn't be mentioning Bill Clinton at all.
They all run the Clinton Foundation together with Chelsea, which appears to be in on some of this stuff.
Let's just say it doesn't surprise us that the Clintons would come up in relation to the Wiener probe.
But yes, I do have confidence that Trump did no such thing, he had nothing to do with Epstein (and even banned him from one of his properties) years before it came out the guy was a pedo.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...
Yeah, they almost got away with another bird dogging attempt.
No wonder they were so quick to interview him on the media and get this story out, whereas you see little mention of that guy in Nevada who tried to steal guard's gun at a rally to shoot Trump.
Everything the Clinton campaign accuses Trump of is shit they're guilty of themselves
news of the Uranium One deal starts filtering out into the public - Accuse Trump of being a Russian agent
Accusations of Trump inciting violence at his rallies - turns out they've been sending operatives to them to start fights
say that Trump has a bad temperament which will lead to WWIII - Hillary wants to shoot down Russian planes over Syria
I can only assume at this point that Hillary is personally raping kids with a strap-on
This is absolutely absurd. No Republican has ever been found to be doing something scientifically.
When it all comes down to it, I think he may lose the election squarely because of HB2. North Carolina, being a purple state with large urban centers, has a lot of very ticked off voters in Wilmington, Asheville, Charlotte, and Raleigh because of what the Republican-controlled state house and governer's office has done to the state with the discriminatory law. For someone like me whose fairly young (31) and suffering political burnout, the law has had the opposite effect that state republicans intendend: it didn't galvanize the far right but instead pissed off the moderates who tend to be financially conservative but socially liberal. I will be showing up at the polls specifically to vote out the idiots in the state legislature who passed this atrocity as well as tell the governor where he can stick it. I suspect a large percentage of voters in this pool aren't inclined to vote for Trump.
they scramble to STEAL it! if you think your vote counts you are uninformed The S-Electoral College takes precedence over the popular vote - ore did u sleep thru bush/gore in 2000? George Soros(black lives matter) owns the voting machines in 16 states. there is NO WAY your vote will go to the person you chose! forget it. not possible. Boycott and make them have a REDO! doesn't the fraud on the part of the DNC sabotaging Sanders give good cause? .. ...
the incidents captured on film prove Felony acts. oh. that's right! DOJ is in the Clinton Cabal there is no justice in America! see the anonymous videos WHO IS HUMA? Beware the Useful Idiots
How to create a social state by Saul Alinsky: There are 8 levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state.
The first is the most important.
1) Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people
2) Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).
6) Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion — Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools.
8) Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
Now, think
Does any of this sound like what is happening to the United States?
Obama was influenced by the writings and philosophies Saul Alinsky, author of the book, "Rules for Radicals," and later by Frank Marshall Davis, with similar philosophies.
Barak Obama followed the philosophies of these 'role models' throughout his days as a Community Organizer for ACORN, using tactics that appeared to some as 'shaking down' businesses in exchange for not branding them 'hate groups.'
And apparently Obama is still following those radical rules today.
Recall that Hillary Clinton did her college thesis on his writings and Barack Hussein Obama writes about him in his books.