there are measurable differences between races and sexes.
So.... we're all in agreement then?
Remove the conjunction which does not exist and "yes", I agree. Amazingly, this is where I started and you attempted to contradict. Wow! Isn't logic fun? (That's rhetorical, just in case you miss it.)
There is no "but", there are measurable differences between races and sexes. Claiming it's a "social construct" is absolutely false, the end. You attempting to minimize it also does not make it false. From where I sit right now I see several very distinct races and genders. If I were to ask the Chinese woman about her African Penis she would have every right to request my institutionalization. If you truly believe that there is no difference, please submit yourself for medical treatment.
If you are attempting to claim that discrimination is legal in the US, I challenge you to start writing President Obama and and referring to him as an "N" word.
If you are attempting to claim that disparity exists in the world, I challenge you to move to that country and do something about it instead of making false claims in mine. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out./p
Let us remove all the emotional crap about beauty "standards" and replace them with what they are. Biological triggers for reproduction. Symmetric features, healthy body shape, healthy hair, healthy smell, and yes healthy skin (1) are all measures we have evolved with to find mates we will most likely succeed in having healthy children with.
1. Healthy skin is not just color, though it is much easier to see poor health on lighter skin. Oily skin, acne, blotchy skin, ringworm, ticks, etc... etc... are all signs of unhealthy skin. Claiming color is the only factor ignores reality, and has become a false narrative for these SJW (Cultural Marxist) movements.
Claiming we should ignore a person's health when choosing a mate is akin to saying the thing we mate with makes no difference, and the gender makes no difference, and the age makes no difference (who needs puberty right SJWs?) Interestingly the same thing these people tell you does not matter when it comes to using private spaces like rest rooms.
If you want to build a bullshit narrative to promote your communist beliefs at least have the audacity to use facts to do so.
I realize that today's cool kids believe "reading is for teh mentals", but wholly crap you should try it some time. Races are genetic and biological, just like gender is genetic and biological. These are not "social constructs" no matter what your gender studies professor tried to tell you. They are measurable physical differences in DNA, which if you had bothered to take Math and Biology you would already know.
Stop listening to everything people tell you and question the world for change.
There is a whole lot of data in a Resume, which people post to LinkedIn as it is required for job hunting. Sure, you can restrict access to viewers of your resume but they have _YOUR_ credentials so _YOUR_ resume can be easily accessed.
These hackers with your resume would have access to street addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, Twitter handles, and other aliases and information people normally include in resumes. It may not be your SSN and bank account information, but sure can be used for Social Engineering and more nefarious purposes.
WUT!?! UN-POSSIBLE!!.6 seconds to type letters and press "search". In other words, if you did try I suggest a full lobotomy and castration.
Trolls and shills never apologize, so I have very low hopes.
And to be very clear for the innocent bystander again, the dozen lawsuits a year number is for US lawsuits only. Monsanto does this in several dozen countries, so don't let the "but it's a small number" gag food you. Monsanto pays shills, trolls, traditional PR/Marketing firms, and loads of money for lobbying every year.
I am not going to read through 150 cases because _you_ are lazy and want to claim a single generalization fits for all 150 cases. You know of one case, and are so content in your delusion that you refuse to do the work. Sucks to be you.
Thanks for the attention, I hope your masters pay you well for being a liar.
For the innocent bystander, this is more propaganda. Law suits about "stealing seed" relate to what farmers call "bleed" where plants grow on areas of land which are not farmed and not maintained. At least one of those cases was brought about by the farmer suing Monsanto because their seed started creeping into their land, and Monsanto successfully sued them for patent infringement in retaliation.
There is a very well known revolving door between the highest Federal offices and Big Business, Agriculture is a part of this cronyism.
When businesses behave altruistically they can be treated as such, and I would defend them and their altruism. They don't, so I don't.
I can find no references in agricultural history claiming that stocking seeds is bad. In fact I find quite the opposite to be true, and instances of civilizations starving to death because they had to use all of their seed during a hard time.
Did you say the wrong thing? If not, I want citations which disprove everything I can find in every history book I have ever read.
Such a small fragment of truth you should have at least tried to verity. From a quick Google search the number is more than 140 lawsuits filed by one company (Monsanto) against farmers. This does not include any of the other companies performing genetic modification or licensed by Monsanto to use their seeds and their lawsuits.
The fragment of truth is that one lawsuit made it to the Supreme Court who upheld Monsanto's rights to sue.
The second tiny fragment of truth is that one patent expired. There are hundreds of thousands of seeds on patent.
All that said, when Monsanto goes after a specific farmer even if the patent is expired the claim generally puts farmers out of business.
The problem is not GMO as much as shit business practices who ensure that consumers get fucked because competition does not exist. A pox on all the people modding down anything that can possibly be perceived as anti-GMO.
There are also companies who profit from selling seeds and have a history of lawsuits against independent farmers for allegedly stealing seeds. It's amazing how these "debates" mostly revolve around the asinine extremes isn't it?
You are ignorant, or pretending for personal benefit. Language is not variable substitution, it is conceptual. The concepts are not unidirectional, they often run contrary. The company lying in TFA, and you, are attempting to pretend that language is nothing more than variable substitution. X => A, Y => B, Z => C, etc..
That in and of itself is a huge mountain to climb technically, but now stuff it all into voice recognition with all of the possible pronunciations and vocal differences/problems. Fat frigging chance!
We don't have perfect text to text translation, and you want to try and claim we can slap together voice? Dreams are fine, but at least put yours in proper context.
And... since I'm not registered on this board or something, I guess I'm down as "Anonymous Coward". OK well, - I'm Kate, Maria Schneider's sister. There! Not anonymous!
Wow, your sister was really quick to disown you.:)
Thanks for the humor, I laughed out loud at some of your sarcasm!
Of course there isn't, which is why it must be entrusted to the state to perform the task! Just think about how badly the previously unregulated parenting regime has done over the years.
Actually the State is responsible for raising the majority of millennials. The overwhelming number of poor kids in and from single mom houses is also because of the State You may have intended to imply as much, but I didn't see it.
It is funny though, that the most vocal and active Progressive/Feminists are all upper/upper middle class. I couldn't possibly see how they could stand to gain by crippling the underclasses with a degenerate Marxist ideology like Feminism. Surely there has never been a revolutionary ideology that was co-opted or has existed solely for the benefit of its proponents.
The Russians used to call a certain type of person a "Useful Idiot". A century of government controlled education has bred a majority of them.
Soldiers actually have more rights and (of course) responsibilities then other Government workers. More rights? Once you swear that oath you give up all, and that means ALL, protection granted to citizens under the US Constitution. If you have any doubts what so ever, I demand that you enlist, swear that oath, and go tell your boss to fuck off. Tell someone of higher rank than you that you won't do what they say, that you don't like PT, and that your locker is yours and they can't look inside.
I'd ask you to write me from Fort Leavenworth but you don't have the balls to do any such thing, and are pretty happy with yourself and your gross ignorance. Really easy to talk out your asshole and be wrong.
I think that Hillary learned how to be evasive and deny from the best in the CIA. It's pretty amazing how many critical files and witnesses have 'vanished' since the advent of the CIA.
I really have a hard time comprehending people openly attacking free speech, which this is. A prank flimed and uploaded to the Internet can not make everyone happy. It should not do so, that is quite contrary to any rational thought. If people being offended is a measure of legality, I want every member of Fox News, NBC News, ABC News, MSNBC News, and CNN jailed immediately. In addition, I want every politician arrested, and every comedian alive would have to be jailed too. I love me some Lewis Black, but dang it if he is not offensive to many.
Borrowing from Ben Shapiro, Being offended is not a measure of anything. "I don't care about your feelings, I care about facts."
Adding manure frosting to the crap cake, the anti speech posts are all being modded up.
Why is it that you can only talk about the extreme minority of "raising rich men's kids"? Why is it that you can only paint being a parent as this pathetic lowly task? Is there any job more important than raising the next generation of humans? No, but people fall into the delusion trap because they are told that the only thing that matters is having stuff that you buy from a store.
You don't have to think very hard about the debate to figure out that someone, mainly the consumer class, has been getting fucked over by this rhetoric for decades.
Men are completely incapable of growing a baby inside a uterus and giving birth, they are also incapable of breast feeding that baby. Meanwhile women _DO_ have a choice of having kids and raising a family. They also have a choice of working and getting educated. Discrimination laws already exist, and have for nearly half a century covering all possible aspects of work and education equality. Men are the ones given no choice (because "biology"), yet they are consistently painted as the evil oppressor. Delusion is rampant in this country.
You just stated that stay at home moms are "slaves". Good grief, how do you not see the horse crap spraying out of your head at this point? How do you breath through all the manure?
TFA states that women are smarter in Math in progressive countries, but there is a missing fact that the majority of women choose not to work in STEM fields in those same countries. TFA is sporting a meaningless statement to support a positive progressive appearance, instead of the reality. People like you buy right into the delusion.
You are complaining about wages that meet what a Police officer makes, without any of the requirements. Wages that are more than double what a person who enlists in the Military. And you try to excuse that with the "dead end" job excuse which can be applied to EVERY POSSIBLE ENTRY LEVEL JOB!
While we are at it, why is it okay for Government workers to Unionize, but Military people can't? Oh my, there is a convincing argument which translates to ALL GOVERNMENT JOBS.
I doubt that any of that will sink into your brain bucket. You will probably retort with the same argument again, and I'll simply ignore it. You have not convinced me of anything but your own ignorance and bias and I doubt you ever could.
Slashdot Mirror
The differences are real and measurable:
there are measurable differences between races and sexes.
So.... we're all in agreement then?
Remove the conjunction which does not exist and "yes", I agree. Amazingly, this is where I started and you attempted to contradict. Wow! Isn't logic fun? (That's rhetorical, just in case you miss it.)
Oh yeah? Care to pick the drink with iocane powder? You really don't want to go against the smartest man in the world.
The differences are real and measurable but:
There is no "but", there are measurable differences between races and sexes. Claiming it's a "social construct" is absolutely false, the end. You attempting to minimize it also does not make it false. From where I sit right now I see several very distinct races and genders. If I were to ask the Chinese woman about her African Penis she would have every right to request my institutionalization. If you truly believe that there is no difference, please submit yourself for medical treatment.
If you are attempting to claim that discrimination is legal in the US, I challenge you to start writing President Obama and and referring to him as an "N" word.
If you are attempting to claim that disparity exists in the world, I challenge you to move to that country and do something about it instead of making false claims in mine. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on your way out./p
I laughed so hard I got a teary eye... :)
Let us remove all the emotional crap about beauty "standards" and replace them with what they are. Biological triggers for reproduction. Symmetric features, healthy body shape, healthy hair, healthy smell, and yes healthy skin (1) are all measures we have evolved with to find mates we will most likely succeed in having healthy children with.
1. Healthy skin is not just color, though it is much easier to see poor health on lighter skin. Oily skin, acne, blotchy skin, ringworm, ticks, etc... etc... are all signs of unhealthy skin. Claiming color is the only factor ignores reality, and has become a false narrative for these SJW (Cultural Marxist) movements.
Claiming we should ignore a person's health when choosing a mate is akin to saying the thing we mate with makes no difference, and the gender makes no difference, and the age makes no difference (who needs puberty right SJWs?) Interestingly the same thing these people tell you does not matter when it comes to using private spaces like rest rooms.
If you want to build a bullshit narrative to promote your communist beliefs at least have the audacity to use facts to do so.
I realize that today's cool kids believe "reading is for teh mentals", but wholly crap you should try it some time. Races are genetic and biological, just like gender is genetic and biological. These are not "social constructs" no matter what your gender studies professor tried to tell you. They are measurable physical differences in DNA, which if you had bothered to take Math and Biology you would already know.
Stop listening to everything people tell you and question the world for change.
There is a whole lot of data in a Resume, which people post to LinkedIn as it is required for job hunting. Sure, you can restrict access to viewers of your resume but they have _YOUR_ credentials so _YOUR_ resume can be easily accessed.
These hackers with your resume would have access to street addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, Twitter handles, and other aliases and information people normally include in resumes. It may not be your SSN and bank account information, but sure can be used for Social Engineering and more nefarious purposes.
This did serve as a reminder that I should change my LinkedIn Password though :)
WUT!?! UN-POSSIBLE!! .6 seconds to type letters and press "search". In other words, if you did try I suggest a full lobotomy and castration.
Trolls and shills never apologize, so I have very low hopes.
And to be very clear for the innocent bystander again, the dozen lawsuits a year number is for US lawsuits only. Monsanto does this in several dozen countries, so don't let the "but it's a small number" gag food you. Monsanto pays shills, trolls, traditional PR/Marketing firms, and loads of money for lobbying every year.
I am not going to read through 150 cases because _you_ are lazy and want to claim a single generalization fits for all 150 cases. You know of one case, and are so content in your delusion that you refuse to do the work. Sucks to be you.
Thanks for the attention, I hope your masters pay you well for being a liar.
For the innocent bystander, this is more propaganda. Law suits about "stealing seed" relate to what farmers call "bleed" where plants grow on areas of land which are not farmed and not maintained. At least one of those cases was brought about by the farmer suing Monsanto because their seed started creeping into their land, and Monsanto successfully sued them for patent infringement in retaliation.
There is a very well known revolving door between the highest Federal offices and Big Business, Agriculture is a part of this cronyism.
When businesses behave altruistically they can be treated as such, and I would defend them and their altruism. They don't, so I don't.
I can find no references in agricultural history claiming that stocking seeds is bad. In fact I find quite the opposite to be true, and instances of civilizations starving to death because they had to use all of their seed during a hard time.
Did you say the wrong thing? If not, I want citations which disprove everything I can find in every history book I have ever read.
Such a small fragment of truth you should have at least tried to verity. From a quick Google search the number is more than 140 lawsuits filed by one company (Monsanto) against farmers. This does not include any of the other companies performing genetic modification or licensed by Monsanto to use their seeds and their lawsuits.
The fragment of truth is that one lawsuit made it to the Supreme Court who upheld Monsanto's rights to sue.
The second tiny fragment of truth is that one patent expired. There are hundreds of thousands of seeds on patent.
All that said, when Monsanto goes after a specific farmer even if the patent is expired the claim generally puts farmers out of business.
The problem is not GMO as much as shit business practices who ensure that consumers get fucked because competition does not exist. A pox on all the people modding down anything that can possibly be perceived as anti-GMO.
There are also companies who profit from selling seeds and have a history of lawsuits against independent farmers for allegedly stealing seeds. It's amazing how these "debates" mostly revolve around the asinine extremes isn't it?
You are ignorant, or pretending for personal benefit. Language is not variable substitution, it is conceptual. The concepts are not unidirectional, they often run contrary. The company lying in TFA, and you, are attempting to pretend that language is nothing more than variable substitution. X => A, Y => B, Z => C, etc..
That in and of itself is a huge mountain to climb technically, but now stuff it all into voice recognition with all of the possible pronunciations and vocal differences/problems. Fat frigging chance!
We don't have perfect text to text translation, and you want to try and claim we can slap together voice? Dreams are fine, but at least put yours in proper context.
And... since I'm not registered on this board or something, I guess I'm down as "Anonymous Coward". OK well, - I'm Kate, Maria Schneider's sister. There! Not anonymous!
Wow, your sister was really quick to disown you. :)
You are attempting to convince a troll. An anonymous troll at that. Good luck with that!
Of course there isn't, which is why it must be entrusted to the state to perform the task! Just think about how badly the previously unregulated parenting regime has done over the years.
Actually the State is responsible for raising the majority of millennials. The overwhelming number of poor kids in and from single mom houses is also because of the State You may have intended to imply as much, but I didn't see it.
It is funny though, that the most vocal and active Progressive/Feminists are all upper/upper middle class. I couldn't possibly see how they could stand to gain by crippling the underclasses with a degenerate Marxist ideology like Feminism. Surely there has never been a revolutionary ideology that was co-opted or has existed solely for the benefit of its proponents.
The Russians used to call a certain type of person a "Useful Idiot". A century of government controlled education has bred a majority of them.
Soldiers actually have more rights and (of course) responsibilities then other Government workers. More rights? Once you swear that oath you give up all, and that means ALL, protection granted to citizens under the US Constitution. If you have any doubts what so ever, I demand that you enlist, swear that oath, and go tell your boss to fuck off. Tell someone of higher rank than you that you won't do what they say, that you don't like PT, and that your locker is yours and they can't look inside.
I'd ask you to write me from Fort Leavenworth but you don't have the balls to do any such thing, and are pretty happy with yourself and your gross ignorance. Really easy to talk out your asshole and be wrong.
I think that Hillary learned how to be evasive and deny from the best in the CIA. It's pretty amazing how many critical files and witnesses have 'vanished' since the advent of the CIA.
is circular logic to blow your mind, then circular logic is all it takes to blow your mind.
So now the world has one less AC.. woohoo!
I really have a hard time comprehending people openly attacking free speech, which this is. A prank flimed and uploaded to the Internet can not make everyone happy. It should not do so, that is quite contrary to any rational thought. If people being offended is a measure of legality, I want every member of Fox News, NBC News, ABC News, MSNBC News, and CNN jailed immediately. In addition, I want every politician arrested, and every comedian alive would have to be jailed too. I love me some Lewis Black, but dang it if he is not offensive to many.
Borrowing from Ben Shapiro, Being offended is not a measure of anything. "I don't care about your feelings, I care about facts."
Adding manure frosting to the crap cake, the anti speech posts are all being modded up.
Why is it that you can only talk about the extreme minority of "raising rich men's kids"? Why is it that you can only paint being a parent as this pathetic lowly task? Is there any job more important than raising the next generation of humans? No, but people fall into the delusion trap because they are told that the only thing that matters is having stuff that you buy from a store.
You don't have to think very hard about the debate to figure out that someone, mainly the consumer class, has been getting fucked over by this rhetoric for decades.
Men are completely incapable of growing a baby inside a uterus and giving birth, they are also incapable of breast feeding that baby. Meanwhile women _DO_ have a choice of having kids and raising a family. They also have a choice of working and getting educated. Discrimination laws already exist, and have for nearly half a century covering all possible aspects of work and education equality. Men are the ones given no choice (because "biology"), yet they are consistently painted as the evil oppressor. Delusion is rampant in this country.
You just stated that stay at home moms are "slaves". Good grief, how do you not see the horse crap spraying out of your head at this point? How do you breath through all the manure?
TFA states that women are smarter in Math in progressive countries, but there is a missing fact that the majority of women choose not to work in STEM fields in those same countries. TFA is sporting a meaningless statement to support a positive progressive appearance, instead of the reality. People like you buy right into the delusion.
You are complaining about wages that meet what a Police officer makes, without any of the requirements. Wages that are more than double what a person who enlists in the Military. And you try to excuse that with the "dead end" job excuse which can be applied to EVERY POSSIBLE ENTRY LEVEL JOB!
While we are at it, why is it okay for Government workers to Unionize, but Military people can't? Oh my, there is a convincing argument which translates to ALL GOVERNMENT JOBS.
I doubt that any of that will sink into your brain bucket. You will probably retort with the same argument again, and I'll simply ignore it. You have not convinced me of anything but your own ignorance and bias and I doubt you ever could.