Thats nothing I can search the first 200 million digits of pi by going to http://www.angio.net/pi/piquery..all on the PII i have in the corner...aint I something?:)
If you hash the digital photo and then print the hash on the photo don't you change the hash?
Does the system only take into account the pixels around the place the hash will be printed (i.e. excluse a corner)?
What stops someone just making a new hash after a photo has been doctored? Maybe a HMAC with a private key? If so how is the key secret from those likely to doctor photos?
Seems to me there are better questions than the integrity of MD5.
I think it's worth noting that what was aired wasn't the same as the transcript linked in the article. One of the more interesting things touched on was the semantic web and I think TBL made a very good layman's description of what it means to surfers.
For the next 24 hours you can catch a repeat of the aired version on the Newsnight website (It loops and it's starting as I type so give it 15-20 minutes from now)
"The full interview can be seen on BBC 4 later in the summer".
Are you talking about the 1.28 seconds it takes radio waves to reach the Moon, the 1.23 milliseconds to the ISS or the 4 minutes 22 seconds for signals to reach Mars?
I'm pretty sure they can hold more than that, I transferred just under an hour of DV footage to disk the other day and the resulting DV-AVI was 15.0 GB.
Yeah but we were talking about people who have changed their password and probably use the same password on other websites or services - for example: e-mail/gmail/paypal.
Once you have access to someones e-mail you have access to alot of online accounts.
On a more serious note to my sister post, truncating just produces a better chance of hash collision for authentication purposes.
Not a problem if your web app limits the number of attempts to login, but isn't less computational power needed to generate a collision exactly why some ciphers have stopped using MD5/SHA1 as a component?
What's to stop the cracker targetting one user specifically (who knows maybe stealing everyones details was a sneaky way to look untargeted), building his own database with the beowulf cluster they built in their mums basement, and doing a prefix search? Eh?
It's not like this individual has anything better to do.
Take me to XML Island
on
DHTML Utopia
·
· Score: 1
Can anyone tell me why Microsoft's "XML Data Islands" didn't take off in the mainstream given that IE has had a 90% browser share? For external XML they are simple and neat and don't require any javascript whatsoever for basic fetch-and-display use (but you can enhance functionality using javascript).
Here's a demo (use IE5 or later). I figure they must be in use somewhere because there's even a Mozilla article on getting them working in Mozilla.
"Opera's developers have been working hard on getting the Acid2 test right. Most of the work is being done on a new branch of the core Opera code. This code branch is not ready for public consumption yet. So rejoice to see the progress, but don't expect to see this coming to a computer near you in the near future.
I will explain some of the fixes done so far over the next couple of weeks. Note that regression testing is still being done, and some fixes might have to be reverted if it turns out important sites rely on the old behavior."
Nevada already recognises prostitution as an occupation, they need a state issued license and they pay tax on their income. (You probably know all this.)
However I don't see how they can introduce a tax on fairly low key ranches in the middle of nowhere, that people goto willingly, in the name protect "the children" or for any moral reason.
Slashdot Mirror
Thats nothing I can search the first 200 million digits of pi by going to http://www.angio.net/pi/piquery ..all on the PII i have in the corner...aint I something? :)
Or use the htaccess line:
php_flag register_globals 1
- If you hash the digital photo and then print the hash on the photo don't you change the hash?
- Does the system only take into account the pixels around the place the hash will be printed (i.e. excluse a corner)?
- What stops someone just making a new hash after a photo has been doctored? Maybe a HMAC with a private key? If so how is the key secret from those likely to doctor photos?
Seems to me there are better questions than the integrity of MD5.Dupe comment?
Yeah but there are a great deal less IE/MS hammering and "Oh look Firefox/a Linux programmer/Google farted" stories.
Grandpa says "In addition to backups, I highly recommend running RAID"
I think it's worth noting that what was aired wasn't the same as the transcript linked in the article. One of the more interesting things touched on was the semantic web and I think TBL made a very good layman's description of what it means to surfers.
For the next 24 hours you can catch a repeat of the aired version on the Newsnight website (It loops and it's starting as I type so give it 15-20 minutes from now)
"The full interview can be seen on BBC 4 later in the summer".
"Where's pascal.net" -> Delphi 2005 has .NET support.
Are you talking about the 1.28 seconds it takes radio waves to reach the Moon, the 1.23 milliseconds to the ISS or the 4 minutes 22 seconds for signals to reach Mars?
Boy it'd really suck if it was badly damaged mid-flight and screwed up their data set.
Results 1 - 20 of about 824,000 for ferrari. (0.08 seconds)
It varies. When I view it through Coral cache I get 461,000
I'm pretty sure they can hold more than that, I transferred just under an hour of DV footage to disk the other day and the resulting DV-AVI was 15.0 GB.
Yeah but we were talking about people who have changed their password and probably use the same password on other websites or services - for example: e-mail/gmail/paypal.
Once you have access to someones e-mail you have access to alot of online accounts.
On a more serious note to my sister post, truncating just produces a better chance of hash collision for authentication purposes.
Not a problem if your web app limits the number of attempts to login, but isn't less computational power needed to generate a collision exactly why some ciphers have stopped using MD5/SHA1 as a component?
What's to stop the cracker targetting one user specifically (who knows maybe stealing everyones details was a sneaky way to look untargeted), building his own database with the beowulf cluster they built in their mums basement, and doing a prefix search? Eh?
It's not like this individual has anything better to do.
"meant" implies purpose. I refuse to believe I have any purpose.
Try Becky - it's free, it's fast and there are quite a few plugins and themes out there if you look (just watch out for the japaneseness)
News just in, the dinosaur is extinct.
Can anyone tell me why Microsoft's "XML Data Islands" didn't take off in the mainstream given that IE has had a 90% browser share? For external XML they are simple and neat and don't require any javascript whatsoever for basic fetch-and-display use (but you can enhance functionality using javascript).
Here's a demo (use IE5 or later). I figure they must be in use somewhere because there's even a Mozilla article on getting them working in Mozilla.
Opera Acid2 as of today and the forum post accompanying the attachment:
Good news for Opera users.
wow article link bashing is now cross-article?
:)
That really ticked you off didn't it
Before you go karma whoring you might like to check that the link is useful. All of the # page links go back to the original server.
Great so all we have to do is now spread the word about open source pornography. ;-)
Nevada already recognises prostitution as an occupation, they need a state issued license and they pay tax on their income. (You probably know all this.)
However I don't see how they can introduce a tax on fairly low key ranches in the middle of nowhere, that people goto willingly, in the name protect "the children" or for any moral reason.
Some people have poked at a good point that needs threading.
How will this taxation work for free and amateur/voyeur (people exchanging footage via forums etc (I know of a few)) pornography?
How can the government stop people from putting up their own kinky videos for free?