Slashdot Mirror


Cheap Tapeless DV Capture?

K'thardin asks: "Recently I've been chafing under the limitations of mini-DV tapes, as I attend various conventions throughout the year and record certain events and information panels. These limitations include dropped frames, gummed up tape heads (especially prevalent when you spend more than fifteen minutes at a time on pause), and most importantly, time constraints as the largest mini-DV tapes can only hold 83 minutes on SP (a little over 2 hours on EP, with a loss in quality and larger possibility of dropped frames). Several events I attend can run for 4 hours or more, so the time constraint is one of the worst, as it requires me to change tapes several times, thus loosing vital footage." Are there video acquisition devices out there that can record to high density media as well as (or instead of) DV Tapes? If not, how difficult would it be to build a portable one? "There are several tapeless acquisition systems out there, such as the Firestore FS-4, the QuickStream, and the ADS Pyro drive. The advantages to these solutions are generally longer recording time, elimination of dropped frames, and the ability to record natively in several video formats, removing the need for time-consuming tape capture. The problem with most of these is that they are prohibitively expensive for the larger capacities, require user-built portable power solutions for long duration recording times, are not upgradeable, and have been reported to be buggy by several users.

Considering these devices are little more than specialized computers, I've been considering what sort of devices would be a cheap and more reliable alternative to commercial offerings. An article on DVInfoNet details the creation of a relatively cheap and upgradeable tapeless acquisition system that uses a tablet PC. The problem with this is power and space constraints. There are several existing and upcoming Linux-based devices out there (as well as those that can be made to be Linux devices) that can be made to do what I wish with the capacities I need. The problem there is that none of the ones I've found come with a Firewire port, which is vital for tapeless acquisition on current DV based cameras. Also is the problem that many of these acquisition systems do not have the capability of being upgraded, or simply lack the ability for one to swap out hard drives should it become necessary (such as recording two 4-hour events back to back ... I've done this). The only possible solution I've seen containing a needed Firewire port is the Apple iPod, and it doesn't seem to have the ability to process the information coming in from a camcorder fast enough to prevent jittery video; nor is it upgradeable.

Does anyone else have this complaint? Are there any devices I've overlooked that fit the criteria of small, relatively powerful, cheap, power-efficient, Firewire-enabled devices with upgradeable/swappable hard drives that are able to run Linux?"

259 comments

  1. web cam? by CPgrower · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Perhaps an Apple iSight cam and laptop with a large hard drive?

    1. Re:web cam? by cyberworm · · Score: 4, Funny

      iSight is a fun toy, and good for confrencing and maybe seeing a girl naked on the other side of the country, I don't think it'd be that great for recording your favorite stripper's 4 hour set.

    2. Re:web cam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like a viable solution for this as well.

      The resolution and capablities may be impressive for a web cammera but the quality is poor compared to what I'm use to.
      I use a Panasonic AG-DVX100A for recordings and it blows an iSight out of the water... that aside webcammeras just don't have the things you need for a portable cammera...stabalization, manual controls, etc.

  2. The Archos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Archos has a video capture device, thast uses a 20Gb hard drive. This should be able to store much more than 4 hours of video.

    1. Re:The Archos by liquidice5 · · Score: 1

      an hour of DV is about 13-18 GB

      so... no

      --

      Conscience is the inner voice that warns us somebody is looking - H.L. Mencken
    2. Re:The Archos by loraksus · · Score: 1

      You can upgrade the hard drive in most, if not all, archos products.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  3. Dare I guess by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1, Funny

    gummed up tape heads (especially prevalent when you spend more than fifteen minutes at a time on pause),

    Let's see: what kind of movie would you pause for 15 minutes? not a football match (you usually re-run an action over and over, not pause), not a regular movie (same thing)... Obviously a movie that you want to freeze a certain scene to marvel at it at length... hmmm, I wonder...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Dare I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      He's pausing during recording, not during playback.

    2. Re:Dare I guess by william_w_bush · · Score: 2, Informative

      hehe, he means porn, hehe.

      --
      The first rule of USENET is you do not talk about USENET.
    3. Re:Dare I guess by ZenShadow · · Score: 1

      That's only because he has to stop and give the "actors" direction...

      --
      -- sigs cause cancer.
    4. Re:Dare I guess by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      He's pausing during recording, not during playback.

      Too bad, I guess she must be ugly...

    5. Re:Dare I guess by Dragon218 · · Score: 1

      Someone modded this informative!!!!

      I wish I could mod a mod +1 funny

      --

      "It's the little touches that make a future solid enough to be destroyed" --William S. Bourroughs
    6. Re:Dare I guess by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I just have to say... I did a movie shoot entirely on Mini-DV. We had about 12 hours of raw footage. Out of all those hours, I only caught one single dropout in a single clip. This was in 1998---back when they hadn't really perfected the tape technology. Things have only gotten better since then.

      Bottom line is that if you're getting clogged heads after pausing for 15 minutes, you are either using A. the cheapest, crappiest, oldest, most unbelievably shedding tape in the known universe or B. the worst camcorder ever manufactured. Figure out which of these is the case and replace the defective part in question. If you're having enough problems with DV tape to warrant this sort of complaining, there's something seriously wrong.

      Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see something like an iPod repurposed using a Linux-based firmware to do DV capture. It's something somebody could probably hack together in a few hours, given that Linux already runs on the things (or at least some models thereof). However, the reason I'd like to see it is not because tapes aren't a good archival medium, but because for the purposes of video production work, it would be a tremendous time savings if you could skip the capture part entirely and just copy a file across.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  4. When to do it. by Forthan+Red · · Score: 3, Funny

    You just need to remember to change tapes after George Takei talkes, and before the costume contest starts.

    1. Re:When to do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Takei is dead.

  5. Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a cheap webcam and do real-time encoding to divx without dropping any frames. Then again, maybe you aren't in the porn industry...

  6. Macs, Analog, 2 Cameras? by MBCook · · Score: 4, Informative
    My best suggestion would be a Mac (or you should be able to get a PC to do this). You would take a small Mac with you (a mini or a 12" PB) and hook it up to your recording device (either a camcorder via FireWire or an iSight) and record that way. You could plug in a better microphone if you needed one. Shouldn't be too hard to rig up, uses standard power outlets so you can recharge when available (and you could rig up a secondary battery). That would do it. You might be able to get a ultra-portable notebook to do the same thing on the PC side. It's too bad all those portable media players out now can't take video in. But if they did, they'd probably have battery life issues.

    How about... analog? Is digital a requirement? A good quality VHS camcorder (like an old professional model) shoudl be able to tape for quite a long time and give you a great picture. Maybe even beta or VHS-C or 8mm or something. If you go out of the digital realm, you may have better luck. And there must be special VCR type things that can take those tapes and have FireWire to take the video off for you easily.

    My other suggestion is more decidedly low tech: 2+ camcorders. Switch one on when the other is about to run out of tape.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Macs, Analog, 2 Cameras? by MBCook · · Score: 1

      OK, I just saw your HD requirement. That would make it tough. The Mac solution would still work, obviously the analog would be out. You may have to get yourself a professional camera (used, a few years old) might be able to do it. And now that this is "the year of HD" (ha), more camcorders will be comming out, so look around and keep your eye out, you may just have to wait if you can't afford something more professional and have to go prosumer.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Macs, Analog, 2 Cameras? by realityfighter · · Score: 1

      "My other suggestion is more decidedly low tech: 2+ camcorders. Switch one on when the other is about to run out of tape."

      One videographer I know uses this solution. Every event she tapes, she takes along about 6 cameras. This way she can get 2 or more shots continuously.

      If you're wondering where you can get a cheap second DV cam...try looking about for a Sharp Viewcam Z. They have a manufacturing defect that requires you to take out the little watch battery (the one that saves the time stamp and focus setting when you turn the camera off) for the cam to function. As a result I've seen them for about $200 new. The recording quality is quite good on both video and audio as well, although not professional grade.

      --
      A strain of paranoid prevention can be worse than the disease, whate'er the intention.
    3. Re:Macs, Analog, 2 Cameras? by Cylix · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless he has some software to do the transcode on the fly. A firewire dump of cam will be at exactly dvcam speeds *25mb/s if I recall* which could be quite hefty.

      I think he was looking for something a little more portable in mind.

      Also, I have to wonder about his gummed up tape heads as it really sounds like he is alternating some tape stock. (different brands and variants use different lubricants... which is why I always try to keep the same deck type with a certain tape stock)

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    4. Re:Macs, Analog, 2 Cameras? by tonsofpcs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A good quality VHS camcorder (like an old professional model)
      Since when is VHS professional?
      shoudl be able to tape for quite a long time and give you a great picture.
      In SP (the 'greatest' picture that VHS can produce), VHS still creates a lousy picture, and the largest preloaded tapes [for NTSC] are 180 minutes.
      Maybe even beta or VHS-C or 8mm or something.
      I hope you mean Betacam, not Betamax, although it is better than all the other options you have stated. Oh, and still not 2 hours of continuous...
      If you go out of the digital realm, you may have better luck. And there must be special VCR type things that can take those tapes and have FireWire to take the video off for you easily.
      Special VCR? How about just a DV deck or a Digital 8 deck....

      My other suggestion is more decidedly low tech: 2+ camcorders. Switch one on when the other is about to run out of tape.
      Or you could just connect a deck to a camera, and switch the deck on just before the camera runs out, take the tape out of the camera, then put a new tape in the camera just before the deck runs out.... I used to do this with 3/4" all the time, it works out well, as you have overlap to use for editing.

    5. Re:Macs, Analog, 2 Cameras? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      While I'm not sure that carrying a Mac Mini around is exactly the solution this guy is going to be looking for, it would be possible.

      The data rate of Firewire is indeed 25 megabits per second, which turns out to be around 3.6 MB/s, well within the capability of the Mini. And he never said anything about wanting to transcode on the fly...and given that to people doing professional video, DV's quality is considered pretty minimal anyway, I'm not sure it's safe to assume that anything less would be acceptable.

      What I think he should consider is a DV camera to hard drive 'direct box,' like this one. It allows you to connect a camera's digital output directly to a portable Firewire hard drive. Since the box doesn't contain the disks itself, you can just swap the drives for each project. At $1k, they're not cheap, but neither is anything that's designed for professional video production.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    6. Re:Macs, Analog, 2 Cameras? by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Well,

      What they are doing for HD cams right now in that realm. Wireless signal back to a central pick up point. The wireless unit attaches to the cam and the signal is of course picked up and recieved by the central system. There it's tucked away in your HD codec of choice. I'm sure there are some cam's that already have it, but the last time I read anything in that realm was an attached ad on.

      At least, that's one option and kinda handy for any live broadcast or news feed.

      All of those things are prohibitevly expensive because the word broadcast was attached to them. SD options are also available.

      MPEG2 with a 4:2:2 profile at 15mb/s is quite sufficient for studio editing. Because the mpeg2 codec was a little open ended it's changed quite a bit over the years. (ever wonder why you might need to install a canopus mpeg2 codec and the matrox one as well (well vfw codec if you don't have a card that understand matrox mpeg)

      The problem with shooting mini dv period is the chroma loss that accompanies the format.

      Also, Sony has some nice HD cams with hard disks too. Virtually no moving parts and retrieval is a snap. Exactly like the retro fit.

      All in all, that disk kit is probably the best option for this guy. It's either that or someone can manufacture a belt pack for an 802.11g wireless video/reciever kit.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    7. Re:Macs, Analog, 2 Cameras? by gnu-sucks · · Score: 1

      I agree with most everything you said, however, a dv deck will easily run as much or more than a dv hard drive solution.

      The least expensive DV Deck I could find was $580 and looks about as cheap as a VHS VCR, built by JVC. The most expensive is of course the Panasonic $20k unit that one of the engineers at my studio believes will convert from SD to HD... Dunno about that one.

      If you want it portable, you need either another camera (which could act as a DV Deck, depending on how advanced it - Panasonic DVC-30 does it), a DV hard drive, or a computer rig. Avid Free should be enough for the job, I think.

    8. Re:Macs, Analog, 2 Cameras? by tonsofpcs · · Score: 1

      My reply was just to counter this post's great-grandparent's suggestion of VHS and give more logical suggestions. Also, depending on how long you actually record, the DV deck solution is cheaper, as for additional time you need only have more tapes, not more $300+ Hard disk drive units, and will leave no gaps as you can hot-swap tapes with two recorders [on-camera and off-camera]; the cheaper HDD recorders cannot be hot swapped. Another camera does contain a deck, yes, but you would need to be sure that you have one that will record from an IEEE1394 input.

    9. Re:Macs, Analog, 2 Cameras? by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      How the hell did this comment get modded up. Parent specifically asked for *digital* media that obviates the need for time consuming capture. You suggest *analog*. Do the mods realize that solves absolutely none of the problems posed in the original question.

    10. Re:Macs, Analog, 2 Cameras? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since there are now 300 GB firewire external drives available, why not contact the dv camera manufacturers, and see if they they can add to their cameras the ability to recognize and write to external firewire hard drives. The cameras are already computers, so it shouldn't require them to add much if any hardware, just some additional software, maybe add some ram and rom in the camera. Bingo, your storage problems are over, and you eliminate the requirement of an external computer that you really didn't want or need anyway except as a way to receive and then store your video stream. Take along a good size gel cell power source if you can't plug into local ac power, and you're in business. Small, lightweight, large capacity, and since it's basically removeable media, you can take whatever number of drives you will need.

  7. You guess wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Did you by change note that the person was speaking about RECORDING video???

  8. get a JVC HDD camcorder by vladj · · Score: 5, Informative

    JVC recently announced a new HDD-based digital camcorder, with storage of 20 or 30GB that is good for over 10 hours of video.

    http://www.jvc.com/press/index.jsp?item=461&pageID =1
    http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/JVC-Introduce s-Four-Hard-Drive-Based-Everio-Camcorders.htm

    1. Re:get a JVC HDD camcorder by autophile · · Score: 2, Informative
      DV is 13 gigs per hour, and that's already compressed 5:1. I'd go for quality over storage space every time.

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    2. Re:get a JVC HDD camcorder by J.+Random+Luser · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately this, and the Sony DVD camera (just play the disc back on a DVD player) have realtime hardware compression in the camera, so the only way to get the raw video (I hope) is to take the f/w output while shooting. Raw dv PAL or NTSC from a typical mini-dv cam is ~13GB per hour. For HD and pro cameras it goes up, as high as ~100GB per hour. No, the compressed material from the HDD and DVD cameras is not good enough for subsequent editing.

    3. Re:get a JVC HDD camcorder by patternjuggler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The HDV format used in a JVC and two new Sony prosumer cameras is also 13 GB/hour- it uses mpeg2 to achieve the same bit rate as regular DV. It looks superb in motion compared to SD, but if you freeze a frame and zoom in you can see compression artifacts- I haven't inspected broadcast HD closely, it has a similar bit rate to HDV (~20 mbps).

    4. Re:get a JVC HDD camcorder by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "JVC recently announced a new HDD-based digital camcorder, with storage of 20 or 30GB that is good for over 10 hours of video."

      This has already been brought up, but I thought I'd go into a little more detail: The video is too compressed. For somebody capturing a home movie, it's fine. But for actually producing something that'll need to be edited and post processed, it's not a great option. The reason for that is that the footage will be degraded when it comes in. When they go to the process of putting it back to a DV tape, or to DVD etc, they'll need to compress it again. Unfortunately, that'll make the video look crummy. Worse, they would basically lose the ability to do any form of green/blue screen compositing because the compression scheme will jaggedize the edges of the matte. As it is, it's barely possible to get a decent bluescreen shot with DV. Compressing it further will basically destroy this capability.

      What would be nice is if they made an HDD camera like you described, only it holds 80 or so gigs. Then make it easy to swap out the drives. If they can get enough throughput on the drives, they could capture at higher quality and bring a bunch of hot-swappable drives along. If they need longevity, they could lower the quality and get longer recording times. Flexibility is key.

      We're just on the brink of some really cool advances in this arena. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if in the next five years a hard-drive equipped camera was the norm. I'm not exactly a visionary for predicting that, though. At this point, it's a no-brainer.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:get a JVC HDD camcorder by rufo · · Score: 1

      One thing to note is that Final Cut Pro can do native HDV editing. It does so by only re-compressing when it absolutely has to, if the frame has been changed. Otherwise it uses the same MPEG-2 source that was captured off the camera. You still have a generational loss in any parts with changed frames, but it does help significantly. There's a PDF available on Final Cut Pro's HDV editing available at Apple's website.

      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    6. Re:get a JVC HDD camcorder by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      But because MPEG-2 is interframe compression, not intraframe as is DV and MJPEG, it's not suitable for editing. Those camcorders will never be good for anyone who wants to do anything with their video except watch and archive it in raw, recorded form.

      It's a big pain to make a cut when the frame you're cutting in on depends on information located in the preceding frames. In fact, I think it ought to be impossible, without transcoding to an intermediate format and back. (And since we're dealing with lossy compression, the associated loss of quality in doing so.)

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    7. Re:get a JVC HDD camcorder by n6mod · · Score: 1

      Amazing use of buzzwords for so little clue.

      It is true that there is re-encoding required if you cut a GOP. The loss of quality is small, and only happens when you go to a final render. MPEG2 encoders have come a long way, so it's difficult-to-impossible to detect the loss.

      This isn't some esoteric thing, either. Even iMovie does it:

      http://www.apple.com/ilife/imovie/

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    8. Re:get a JVC HDD camcorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really needed something nifty: get a small micro-atx box whose sole purpose in life is to capture data on one firewire port, and send it out on another one (or two). A fairly expensive 3CCD camera cannot defeat/overflow the new firewire standard (1394-B) with data rates that are multiples of the old standard (1394). 1394 was good for 400Mb/s. 1394-B is good for 400/800/1600/3200Mb/s. Couple this with two firewire connected drives (500GB ones like what Maxtor is coming out with this fall) and you should be able to record at least 20 hours worth of shots (per drive). If it isn't enough, firewire is plug/unplug. Get another 500GB drive (or two or three) and just plug-em in when you need more.

    9. Re:get a JVC HDD camcorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unfortunately JVC cameras suck..I speak from experience.. I have a low end model GR-D33 I think.. and there is little to no customer support, don't even think about using SP2, and make sure you use a T.I. chipset ( I don't but it was a pain in the ass to work around it).. other than that I pause/stop a lot while filming (I film mosty underground hip hop events) especially between acts.. but I don't have many dropped frames

    10. Re:get a JVC HDD camcorder by patternjuggler · · Score: 1

      It's a big pain to make a cut when the frame you're cutting in on depends on information located in the preceding frames.

      I guess if you were used to editing dv files by cleaving a video file manually and catting clips together, things are going to go badly with HDV. Fortunately it's a known and well understood problem and there is software out there that can do such things as decode and re-encode MPEG2 with minimal loss of quality. As long as you have the raw video around, you're only going to ever suffer one unnoticeable 'generation' loss (I'm pretty sure the loss will only occur near the edit points, because MPEG2 restarts the differential encoding process periodically so those blocks without cuts in them can be copied bit for bit)- and of course it still looks orders of magnitude better than SD.

      Those camcorders will never be good for anyone who wants to do anything with their video except watch and archive it in raw, recorded form.

      Even two generation losses in HDV is going to look way better than SD and is probably unnoticeable.

  9. I think the problem is that tape is the cheapest.. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    ...method available. According to my math, a single miniDV tape can record nearly 12GB, so obviously affordable solid-state video capture and storage is out for a good while yet.

    The actual demand for portable tapeless recording of any kind is still pretty low. The demand is low enough that only the people that absolutely must have it have to pay a lot because it requires a specialized device that would hook to the Firewire or other port on the camera.

  10. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am ashamed to admit

  11. Easy... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    I have a Mini DV camera with a broken tape drive that I bought on eBay to use as a webcam. It captures video to the hard drive in my laptop over the 1394 port with any of your favorite Windows video editing tools in the same way you would copy the contents of a tape to the hard drive. That way you can use any laptop computer as a high capacity video recording device. I use Windows movie maker just because it's what came with my laptop. The controls leave a little to be desired though.

    1. Re:Easy... by eight+and+a+quarter · · Score: 1

      good idea mcgyver!

      --
      lameness filter thwarted.
    2. Re:Easy... by CPgrower · · Score: 1

      Good solution! Just record the feed from the camera to the drive in real time.

  12. i got the solution by eight+and+a+quarter · · Score: 0, Troll

    ask xzibit to pimp your ride.

    --
    lameness filter thwarted.
  13. Why pause? by log0n · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why not stop recording?

    FWIW, I do video / film production for a living.. this just doesn't make sense. Consumer DV camcorders switch off automatically after a few minutes for a reason - not to save battery life *tho that's a benefit* but because of the exact 'gumming' thing mentioned. The drum spins and creates a magnetic effect which pulls tiny metallic particles off of the tape. Too much of this and your drum/heads/tape gets messed up.

    It seems like the person posting the topic doesn't really understand what they are doing - or rather, they don't have a good foundation on which to improve their problems. So instead they are looking for a product (that's not prohibitively expensive) that caters to the way they think things 'should be done'.

    Learn to work how the gear is designed to work. Then start experimenting.

    1. Re:Why pause? by betsywetsy · · Score: 1

      Further, use the opportunity to swap in a fresh tape, if it's a four hour event.
      (There can't really be such long events without windows where you can change tapes can there? People have to pee!)

    2. Re:Why pause? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I wondered about that. If you've got time to pause for 15 minutes, you've got time to stop and swap tapes. Keep each segment on a separate tape, they're cheap.


      And *always always always* record 5 minutes of black at the top of a new tape. That way all the unstable tension and stuff is out of the way once you start actually using it.

    3. Re:Why pause? by J.+Random+Luser · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why not stop recording?

      Unless you have years of experience with the subjects, and/or have the director standing beside you, you cannot predict when there will be sufficient pause in the action, a) to start from Stop, several seconds longer than from Pause, or b) change a tape - this can take up to 2 minutes with some cameras, 'specially when you are forced by the design to unscrew it from the tripod to get at the tape aperture.

      So, take 2 cameras, each on its own tripod or bracket mount, and annoy the shit out of all the people standing/sitting around you ;-)

    4. Re:Why pause? by dr.badass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It seems like the person posting the topic doesn't really understand what they are doing - or rather, they don't have a good foundation on which to improve their problems. So instead they are looking for a product (that's not prohibitively expensive) that caters to the way they think things 'should be done'.

      Welcome to Ask Slashdot.

      "Hi, I'd like to do $THING. I know that $SOLUTION_A and $SOLUTION_B will do it very easily and for a very reasonable price, but I don't want to use $SOLUTION_A or $SOLUTION_B because $VAGUE_REASON and $CONTRADICTORY_REASON. Instead, I'd like your under-informed ideas on how to achieve my $POORLY_CONCEIVED_AMBITIONS using Linux, duct tape, an iPod, and hours and hours of my precious time."

      With apologies to the inquirer.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    5. Re:Why pause? by christopher240240 · · Score: 1

      My $Deity, sir, you are a $Geinius.

    6. Re:Why pause? by giMlids · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No way. I'm currently post-producing a documentary. We have 45 miniDV tapes. Would have been so great to have 320x240 mpeg-4 written straight to a drive while we were recording onto MiniDV as well. Then we would have immediately had random access to all of our footage, and I wouldn't have had to spend 45 hours capturing all the tapes by hand.

    7. Re:Why pause? by Rantastic · · Score: 1

      Wow! The parent should be modded up to 5 on this one. You have captured it perfectly. In this case, the inquirer is missing it completely. First off, if you are recording important 4 hour sessions, I hope you already have a secord camera that you used as a back up. What a professional would do is have two cameras and overlap them. Then you can combine it in post as the grandparent noted. If you are looking for some magical cheap solution, and you haven't been able to come up with one, odds are that you won't be able to follow the instructions given here by anyone who does cook up some cheapie jerryrig.

      --
      Ask Slashdot: Where bad ideas meet poor googling skills.
    8. Re:Why pause? by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      You make a good point, that maybe he's not too familiar with his equipment and that's keeping him from doing better work, but the only way we get better tech is by consumers bitching.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    9. Re:Why pause? by Basehart · · Score: 1

      "Would have been so great to have 320x240 mpeg-4 written straight to a drive while we were recording onto MiniDV as well."

      I spend a lot of time walking around videoing stuff, and a portable battery powered drive which simply connects to my XL2 via a firewire cable would be an immense time saver!

      As it is, I have to record the video from the MiniDV tape into the G5 real-time before I can start doing anything at all.

    10. Re:Why pause? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Welcome to Ask Slashdot- Replies.

      Reply 1:
      Rant here, based on 25% or less of original post.
      Blindingly obvious but tangential fact #1 here.
      Blindingly obvious but addressed in original post, fact #2 here.
      Comments about intelligence of original poster here, combined with smug inuendo and self aggrandizement.

      Reply 2:
      Same as for reply 1 above, but now directed at poster of Reply 1.

      Reply 3:
      Complete change of topic. The less related the better.

    11. Re:Why pause? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. In order to be prepared for that once-in-a-lifetime shot that will happen unpredicatably, you have to be on your toes constantly, and sometimes that means paused, ready to go, for 15 minutes or even an hour if that's what it takes.

    12. Re:Why pause? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, what a horror of a script! No semicolons anywhere! And you only lexically defined one variable!

    13. Re:Why pause? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      You make a good point about leaving 'roll on' room on the tape at the beginning, but the explanation is one I've never heard.

      The reason I leave space is actually for postproduction: some VTR decks need several seconds of space before the marked cut in point where you want to begin transferring data. You mark the in point, and the deck then automatically backs up, starts playing, and begins transferring at the exact point marked. If you've ever tried to get video off the very beginning of a tape and into FCP or Avid (from a tape where somebody didn't leave any room for roll on), it's a huge pain.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    14. Re:Why pause? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
      That's a slightly different thing. If you black the whole tape before you start, then you've written sync and timecode on as one continuous take. If you then tape over a bit, it will pick up the "old" timecode off the tape. So if you start shooting 5 mins in, wind to 10 mins in and shoot again, the second segment will have timecode representing where it sits on the tape.


      The reason you should avoid the first few minutes of tape is that the hub isn't perfectly circular - there's a bit of a gimp in it where the leader is attached. This causes variations in the tape tension, and even little tiny creases in the surface. Once you've wound a few turns of tape onto it, they are smoothed out.

    15. Re:Why pause? by jcr · · Score: 1

      "Hi, I'd like to do $THING. I know that $SOLUTION_A and $SOLUTION_B will do it very easily and for a very reasonable price, but I don't want to use $SOLUTION_A or $SOLUTION_B because $VAGUE_REASON and $CONTRADICTORY_REASON. Instead, I'd like your under-informed ideas on how to achieve my $POORLY_CONCEIVED_AMBITIONS using Linux, duct tape, an iPod, and hours and hours of my precious time."

      That's strikingly similar to many questions I got as a Developer Technical Support engineer.

      The way I tended to word it though, was: "Dear Sirs: when I stick my thumb in my eye, it hurts. Can you make it not hurt? I realize that I have been told for three consecutive years at your developer conference that sticking my thumb in my eye was not recommended, but I am (naturally) a special case. PS: Not sticking my thumb in my eye is not an option."

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    16. Re:Why pause? by JetTredmont · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I'd say, if you're going to buy a second camera, buy one that takes ~10 seconds to change tape in instead of one where you have to unscrew from the tripod just to eject the disk. Sell your old one on eBay if you want, then buy a THIRD that doesn't have this forehead-slappingly stupid design flaw, and slap yourself on the wrist soundly for ever buying the original camcorder in the first place.

      If you are filming a 4-hour event with no obvious breaks, however, I'd have to say that a single-camera solution isn't the right one. You should at the very least set up multiple cameras on tripods for different angles, and if you are getting paid well for this hire some assistants to man the other cams.

      As the grandparent said, there's always bathroom breaks in there. If there aren't, then either the guy asking you to record it should understand that there will be breaks in coverage, or be paying you enough to come up with a multi-angle/multi-camera shoot solution (where you can flip to a different camera while changing tapes, if necessary).

    17. Re:Why pause? by JetTredmont · · Score: 1

      and I wouldn't have had to spend 45 hours capturing all the tapes by hand.

      Okay, I could understand this if you were talking about hundreds of tapes ... but 45?

      You know how long the tapes are. Just set up a batch in Final Cut Pro (or whatever) to import from Tape 1 from 0:0:0;01 through to the end (add buffer as needed on your hardware), put the first tape in, hit Log, go enjoy yourself for 60-90 minutes, then repeat.

      I mean, I realize this is a two- or three-day project if you have a single machine to dump all this onto (a brilliant student of the arts would scrounge around and borrow a couple friends' machines to do the dumps, then network them all together to move everything to the master machine ... then if your friends have Macs and you have FCP keep the borrowed machine to do clustered QMaster runs to render all your edits in 1/3rd the time), but it's not like you're chained to the editing station that whole time!

  14. software solution? by Nykon · · Score: 1

    I thought Final Cut HD or some similar product would allow real time recording via firewire? I'd imagine you should be able to just hook up your DV camcorder and record to the HD on your laptop or computer?

    --
    "It's better to be a pirate then join the Navy"
    1. Re:software solution? by chadjg · · Score: 1

      It does. I use it, but I refuse to go without a tape based or similiar backup. It doesn't happen often, but glitches happen, especially with FCP 4.5.

      Recording DV isn't a big deal. The reason those custom capture devices are so expensive is convenience and simplicity. If it isn't a problem, hit ebay for a cheap G4 and install extra hard drives, and put the whole mess on a wheel around rack. If you want a belt mounted unit, it is still going to cost big bucks.

      --
      Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
    2. Re:software solution? by J.+Random+Luser · · Score: 1

      QuickTimePro v.7 only $29.99 - hey Steve, that must be worth a free iPod

    3. Re:software solution? by admactanium · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It does. I use it, but I refuse to go without a tape based or similiar backup. It doesn't happen often, but glitches happen, especially with FCP 4.5.
      quicktime broadcaster also lets you tape directly to the hard drive. if you're worried about glitches, then get another camera and another powerbook off ebay (put in a 100gig hard drive). run the two of them together for redundancy. probably a cheaper solution than a lot of the professional systems out there.
  15. I have to say it... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd hate to have to sit thru your home movie collection.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  16. maybe not the best solution...... by johnpaul191 · · Score: 2, Informative

    might not be quite what you want, but some notebook can be set so they do not sleep when the lids are closed. i only know Mac notebook, and that is a feature of the powerbooks (but not ibooks).

    you can carry the notebook in a shoulder bag and hook a DV cam to record straight to the internal drive (bypassing the tape). you would have to offload it later if you want to keep the files at full quality, but that may do it? i do know people do this. it has that 80's camcorder thing going but it may be the cheapest solution.... in the sense that the notebook is not dedicated to this project and you can use any handheld video camera with firewire output (even an apple isight).

    Apple powerbooks have had this feature for a few years, and i really doubt they are the only ones. i am not saying they were first either, i just do not follow other notebooks. the only thing to ponder is that it is a software setting that tells the machine if it should sleep or not when the lid is closed. if the notebook was designed to run OS X or Windows, there may not be an easy way to control that from a Linux install.

    i would assume there is some other all-in-one option, but it might be prohibitively expensive?

    1. Re:maybe not the best solution...... by BlkPanther · · Score: 1

      Just as a answer to your query.... Yes most *any* Windows based laptop can be configured to not go to standby when the lid is closed. This is a configuration feature of Windows, the BIOS or some combination of the two. On my Toshiba laptop, it's totally controlled by the Windows Power control panel applet.

      --


      I find that most often I end up learning from necessity, rather than for enjoyment.
    2. Re:maybe not the best solution...... by jrumney · · Score: 1
      there may not be an easy way to control that from a Linux install.

      Linux has better support for ACPI (the standard that lets you control what the lid button does, among other things) than Windows does. What I mean by better, is that you can specify whatever functionality you want. Windows just gives you a choice of Suspend, Hibernate and Nothing for the lid, and no choice for the power button, but on Linux you could for example power down the soundcard, wifi, display and video chip, leaving the CPU, firewire and hard-drive going. It might take a bit of work, since the standard distro's are only going to offer you the same functionality as Windows out of the box, but it is possible.

    3. Re:maybe not the best solution...... by HeavyD14 · · Score: 1

      Usually, you can set this option in the BIOS settings. I had an old Toshiba, say 1993 (RIP - Not worth my while to fix) that did it, so any computer should be able to be set to do so. Also, who says it has to be closed?

    4. Re:maybe not the best solution...... by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1
      iBooks will sleep when their lid is closed as well.

      There are some solutions on Google but the best I can offer is just to black out the screen. Turn the brightness (F1 and F2) down (F1) until it hits zero bars. Perfect! Just make sure it doesn't fall asleep on you... or you on it...

    5. Re:maybe not the best solution...... by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      >> What I mean by better, is that you can specify whatever functionality you want.

      Yeah right. I can select whatever i want, and get a kernal panic or simply nothing when actually trying to resatart... But yeah, i can enter 35 options into a config file, thats rulez.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  17. I experience this too by andyring · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am hit by this limitation sometimes too, as I frequently record services, special functions, etc., at my church, and many of them run longer than an hour or hour and a half. Lately I've just been bringing my laptop with me (PowerBook G4 12", 80G drive) and recording directly to the hard drive via iMovie. Yeah it's not Linux, but you can get an iBook with 100G hard drive for $1199 from Apple. That will hold a TON of video.

    1. Re:I experience this too by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1, Funny

      That will hold a TON of video

      But with a Beowulf cluster of Linux, I bet you could hold at least a megaton of video.

      Personally though, I wont be satisfied until I can haul a teraton of video around.

    2. Re:I experience this too by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      The only thing is the hard disk in most Powerbooks and iBooks are 5400 RPM. That is too slow for capture. I capture to a tape and then edit things down. On my powerbook, I capture to a external USB drive. I am due to get another one as my existing drive is getting kind of full.

      The funny thing is, in most 4 hour events, you rarely have more then 1 hour that is watchable. It's no fun watching the kids setup the stage for the next act at a school function. I only record when the kids are DOING something and start slightly before and end slightly after. I have been thinking about getting one of those cheap SD card based cams as a backup to my camcorder, and to use when the camcorder, tripod and batteries is too much to carry.

      --

      Gorkman

    3. Re:I experience this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative


      The only thing is the hard disk in most Powerbooks and iBooks are 5400 RPM. That is too slow for capture.

      You say that like you know what you are talking about. Too bad you speak of that you know not of.

      First off, the spin speed doesn't matter, it is the sustained transfer rate.

      Secondly, DV requires 3.6 MB/sec sustained which is trivial for any modern drive. Even 4200 rpm hard drives have a shot at that!

    4. Re:I experience this too by fbjon · · Score: 1
      It's no fun watching the kids setup the stage for the next act at a school function.

      Try a php function instead, you could make all the action by yourself.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    5. Re:I experience this too by dabadab · · Score: 1

      Of course you can do with a laptop that has Linux installed on it and do the capture with e.g. Kino.
      And, if you have some power outlet nearby, you can use a BIG 3.5" HDD in a USB or FW enclosure.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    6. Re:I experience this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But...but...but...The guy at BestBuy told me I *needed* the $400 7200 RPM drive with 16MB cash (sic)if I had any plans to do video editing. Are you suggesting he misled me?"

      Oh yeah, not to mention that after he lambasts laptop hard drives he admits to dumping his video via USB.

  18. Sony DVD Camcorder by Gobelet · · Score: 1

    Sony made some Mini DVD Camcorder, so there's no problem with gummed heads or what not.

    And you can play your movies directly on your DVD player.

    1. Re:Sony DVD Camcorder by kopo · · Score: 1, Informative

      Mini DVDs hold only 30 to 120 minutes of video, depending on quality.
      Even at the highest setting (read: standard, not worse-than-VHS), the quality is inferior to that of MiniDV because of the MPEG-2 compression.
      Furthermore, MPEG-2 video is terrible for editing, since the compression is interframe, not intraframe like with MiniDV.

      Clearly, a Mini DVD camera would be a big step backward for this guy's purposes.

    2. Re:Sony DVD Camcorder by djdj · · Score: 3, Informative

      And when you use DVD instead of MiniDV your picture quality drops significantly. DV has a vastly superior picture to most MPEG-2 implementations. These cameras have to use single pass MPEG-2 encoding, at a maximum of 4-6 Mb/s. DV, though a different type of encoding that doesn't have some of the advanced motion analysis of MPEG-2, has a constant bitrate of 25 Mb/s, which is quite good. And it is better for editing with random seek and insert capability.

      For the highest quality video, stay away from the DVD camcorders.

    3. Re:Sony DVD Camcorder by Gobelet · · Score: 1

      Well that something valuable to know, since I'm going to buy a camera soon.

    4. Re:Sony DVD Camcorder by irtza · · Score: 1

      JVC HD-GR1 records video that I believe is superior to standard Mini-DV recordings using mpeg2. mpeg2 is not the problem, its the bpp and resolution that you record at that is the problem. You can obtain much higher quality with mpeg2 than you probably think.

      The editing can be an issue but good quality frames can be extracted from mpeg2... although it may take longer since it has to decode more than one frame to arrive at the one you want.

      on a side note, is there any other camera in the consumer market that matches JVCs resolution?

      --
      When all else fails, try.
    5. Re:Sony DVD Camcorder by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I'd say the editing problem is the biggest drawback with the direct to DVD cameras. DV is based on MJPEG, where every frame is a key frame, so its very easy for editing programs to splice clips together and layer on effects. MPEG2 removes redundant info (and some non-redundant info that you're not supposed to be able to notice) between frames, so unless you have a specially designed editing program that goes back and pieces together what it can of the missing info, you'll end up with weird artifacts around edits, and you'll be much more limited in the types of effects you can do. If you do have a specialised MPEG2 editor, then expect everything to take much longer to render. Plus they're only mini DVDs, so probably good for 30 minutes at the most, though they'll be cheaper than DV tapes.

    6. Re:Sony DVD Camcorder by connorbd · · Score: 1

      Well...

      DVDs in general use MPEG-2, which proves that if you're willing to devote enough time to optimizing your compression you can get absolutely immaculate pictures from it. But that isn't happening with a realtime MPEG encoder -- the HDV standard is just barely adequate for production work, and requires some heavy duty hardware on the camcorder to do it right.

      As for other HD cameras, Sony has two, but they record in an off-kilter variant of 1080i, not the 720p that the JVC unit uses.

    7. Re:Sony DVD Camcorder by connorbd · · Score: 1

      www.camcorderinfo.com does seem like a good review site. As for DVD, I gotta second it -- the one feature I've seen on DVD camcorders that is even remotely interesting is surround sound, and that strikes me as being quite useless for a home camcorder. Stick with DV if you're editing -- you'll probably never need anything better anyway.

    8. Re:Sony DVD Camcorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AviSynth will solve all of your problems. Google for it.

  19. Camera by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

    Not exactly what you're asking for, but my Sony DSCP10 does about ~4.5 hours of recording (640 x 480/16 frames per second) a 512MB stick.
    And it's main purpose is as digital camera! USB 2 connectivity and long battery life. Good microphone too.

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000 08O35W/102-3682626-8940135?v=glance

    1. Re:Camera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      16fps FUCKING SUCKS

    2. Re:Camera by fimbulvetr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      So does your girlfriend, but you don't hear me complaining.

    3. Re:Camera by splarfage · · Score: 1

      A Canon Powershot S1 records @ 30fps. It makes a pretty good stand-in for a video camera.

    4. Re:Camera by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Hey that looks like a pretty cool camera. Makes me wish I wouldda checked that one out too. However, one of the main selling points for me was the ability to put it in my pocket and this one (dsc-p10) allows me to do that.

  20. Re:I think the problem is that tape is the cheapes by baadger · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure they can hold more than that, I transferred just under an hour of DV footage to disk the other day and the resulting DV-AVI was 15.0 GB.

  21. miniDV is for suckas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You've got two options available in the pro video (non-homebrew) marketplace:

    (a) To get less dropped frames, use DVCAM tape in your miniDV camera, not cheap miniDV tape. DVCAM has a much stronger backing, better lubrication and is generally worth the extra money. Better yet, use a Sony DVCAM camera with the DVCAM tape because the track pitch is wider resulting in fewer (if any) lost frames and you get SMPTE timecode instead of lame, broken mini-DV timecode. However, the downside to this solution is that the tape pulls even faster than DV, resulting in 30% less recording time per tape, and you haev to spend $4000 on the camera at minimum. Woe is Pro.

    (b) Check out the Panasonic P2 cameras which records onto flash media in a variety of digital codecs including DV-25 (same as mini-DV), DVCProHD, etc. While the most you can get right now is a 12 gig flash, that will change eventually and the media ingest to your computer is much faster than capturing. This is the wave of the future. Within a year there will be a P2 camera that's under $3000.

    1. Re:miniDV is for suckas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent's advice is rubbish in the sense that miniDV is good enough.

      You could use two cameras instead of one, switching from to the other. Or just change tapes quickly, which is what I'd do.

    2. Re:miniDV is for suckas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Option (a) is rubbish - MiniDV cameras don't take DVCAM tapes. However, most DVCAM cameras DO take MiniDV tapes though, I assume this is where this person is getting confused (Probablys has never used a 'consumer grade' camera before). And even then, you only get about 45 minutes of video on a MiniDV tape versus a full hour on a regular DVCAM tape. A 'normal' consumer camera will get a full hour on a MiniDV tape though.

    3. Re:miniDV is for suckas by dr.badass · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To get less dropped frames, use DVCAM tape in your miniDV camera, not cheap miniDV tape. DVCAM has a much stronger backing, better lubrication and is generally worth the extra money.

      Wooooooah there. Are you a Sony dealer? You sound like one.

      For one thing, using DVCAM tapes in your non-Sony camera will cause *more* dropouts as the "better lubrication" gets mixed up with the lubricants from whatever tapes you were using before and basically creates a big mess. Notably, sticking Sony tapes in a Panasonic camera is asking for trouble.

      Better advice would be: Use one brand of tapes, and never, ever, switch.

      Better yet, use a Sony DVCAM camera with the DVCAM tape...

      You *are* a Sony dealer!

      Check out the Panasonic P2 cameras

      Ok, maybe you're not a Sony dealer...

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    4. Re:miniDV is for suckas by jrumney · · Score: 1
      Notably, sticking Sony tapes in a Panasonic camera is asking for trouble.

      Woooooah there. Are you a Panasonic dealer? You sound like one.

    5. Re:miniDV is for suckas by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      Woooooah there. Are you a Panasonic dealer? You sound like one.

      No, but I did just buy a DVX100A (like, today), and I did get the advice, from many sources, to stick with Panasonic tapes vs. Sony tapes. Not that they're any better, just that mixing tapes causes problems.

      You could just as easily use only Sony tapes in your Panasonic cam, but then you wouldn't get to join in on all the brand-zealotry flame wars.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    6. Re:miniDV is for suckas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...which records onto flash media...

      It's also worth noting that changing a flash card is a hell of a lot quicker than changing a miniDV tape. And less footage lost = less $$ lost...

      PS: I work in post-production, and miniDV causes nothing but trouble. It's a menace to society.

  22. SP vs LP myth by djdj · · Score: 5, Informative

    Slight correction to a common misconeption about MiniDV tape and the DV format:

    There is no loss in quality going to LP recording mode compared to SP mode. It is still 25 Mb/sec.

    Switching to LP you give up reliable insert editing, recording/playback compatibility with other cameras, and audio dubbing. And you are more likely to have dropouts. But aside from these things, SP and LP produce identical quality video.

    And Digital-8 has the same quality as well. Same 25 MB/sec recording rate. The reason Digital 8 is perceived as an inferior format is because it appears on relatively lower quality cameras. You can dub DV digitally to a Digital 8 deck and you will end up with a perfect copy.

    1. Re:SP vs LP myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong... in marketing speak you are correct, in technical speak you really are wrong.

      LP mode has massively more dropouts and tears in the video your noise ratio is nearly doubled. most people on their Tv set can not tell the difference from their $399 sony palmcorder, but record on a Dv camera with a real lens and real video quality (if it's not 3ccd it sucks) and these stand out like crazy, You notice them even more when editing.

      worse yet many times you get color errors so reds look a bit crushed in LP mode, this is visibvle usually on a 3ccd camera only as the crap quality coming form that tiny 1/5th inch toy grade CDD in your consumer camcorder will not.

    2. Re:SP vs LP myth by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

      This only means that something is wrong with your camera. EP mode does increase the chance of dropouts, but other than that there's no difference in the quality of pictire in each frame. The same data is received form the imaging unit, the same data is recorded on tape in both SP and EP. The recording is digital, meaning that there is no chance of getting any extra "noise" in EP mode. The packet either can be read later (which means that you get the same quality as SP) or cannot be read later (which means that it gets dropped).

  23. hard drives by che.kai-jei · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    alexander sokurov directed the feature film Russian ARk all in ONE *complete* TAKE at 70 odd minutes long.

    it was the first feauture film generally released in theatres to be reocrded completely to HardDrive.
    bloody fucking amazing it was too.

    of course htough us slashdotters and geeks dont know about it. cause you are all too navel gazingly obssessed with micchelle gellar and what brad pitt wears and salivating for firefly than real culture.

    only the effete leftist liberals you mock like me obessesed with eurotrash art might know.

    just had computer with a multi terabyte hard drive array rigged up to it.

    duno the details

    though taht shoukld send you jokers goolging for it if you are intersted

    1. Re:hard drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russian Ark is no more and no less 'real culture' than Firefly is. What sort of person makes a statement like that except for a snobbish insecure twit. So what you know some esoteric film trivia?
      In fact, Russian Ark was a gimmicky, poorly written waste of time... kind of like your post.

      And I aint no lefty liberal like u claim to be. I am an artist living and working in Europe... and you are simply a wannabe.

      Go find yourself a personality of your own... right after you find the effin shift key!

    2. Re:hard drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      alexander sokurov directed the feature film Russian ARk all in ONE *complete* TAKE at 70 odd minutes long.

      One complete take has nothing to do with the quality of the actual movie or the quality of the recording.
      In fact, it has nothing to do with the discussion at all.

    3. Re:hard drives by che.kai-jei · · Score: 1

      whatver, ac . i forget the sarcasm tag.

    4. Re:hard drives by che.kai-jei · · Score: 1

      actually it does.

      it was only this way. that it was possible.

      also general theatre realse means the ath dvd acpture was of sufficiently high quality.

      get a life.

      and sorr yif i have to spell things out ot you.
      please dont trip up over any more sarcasm it might concuss you further into cloddishness.

    5. Re:hard drives by J.+Random+Luser · · Score: 1

      One complete take has nothing to do with the quality of the actual movie or the quality of the recording.
      In fact, it has nothing to do with the discussion at all.


      Well, yes it does. No pause, no stop, no changing tape, all of which was pissing off the OP. And portable, no cables or dolly rails. OK it could have been radioed to an out of shot equipment rack. I've investigated that for my needs, but I think Sokurov's budget was better than mine...

    6. Re:hard drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, these r clearly 2 different ac's.
      paranoid r we?
      as for sarcasm, you wield it about as well as you type.

      and 'concuss you further into cloddishness'--I agree with the other guy. You sound like an arrogant SOB.

  24. record to a laptop by omeomi · · Score: 1

    Just buy a laptop computer with a firewire port, get a decent video capture program that supports firewire capture, plug in your camera, and record straight to hard disk. No tape needed. If you need lots of storage, get a nice big firewire drive.

  25. RCA Lyra? by ff1324 · · Score: 1

    I have never used one, but one of those RCA Lyra may work. They have a composite video in and a recording mode. They record to MPEG-4, however, but you do get up to 80 hours of recorded video.

    Use your current camera and hook the AV outputs into the Lyra. Its not DV, but that's what VirtualDub is for.

    1. Re:RCA Lyra? by howsitgoingeh27 · · Score: 1

      composite video is an evil thing

    2. Re:RCA Lyra? by connorbd · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised. Not so good on analog, but digital composite is another story -- some of the early digital video specs were composite-based, and I think the main reason they didn't catch on was because the analog side of the workflow was all component. They were quite high quality for the time.

    3. Re:RCA Lyra? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually work for RCA's parent, Thomson, and have
      written some video compression code for this device.
      I can't recommend it for this. It only records in
      320x240 (qvga) resolution, and the compression
      quality is quite limited by the embedded processor.

      There are mpeg4 camcorders on the market, and I'm
      sure we'll see h.264 and motion-jpeg2000 ones soon
      if they don't exist already. Analog devices makes
      a nice m-jpeg2k chipset; might want to look for a
      device using it.

  26. Protable and cheap if you have a decent laptop by amliebsch · · Score: 2, Informative
    Step 1: You need a DV camera that has video pass-through. This feature is only found on some camcorders, though many affordable consumer cams do have it. (I know that my Panasonic PV-GS 120 has it, and it wasn't too expensive.) This feature encodes incoming video from a video input or from the lens and constantly encodes and outputs the signal on the IEE1394 link.

    Step 2: Get a laptop with IEEE1394 and install the biggest hard disk that you can. (External hard disks could also be used here.) Use a program like DVIO to capture the incoming DV frames and dump them to a file on your hard disk.

    Presto! DV video capture limited only to the size of your disk partition.

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    1. Re:Protable and cheap if you have a decent laptop by myov · · Score: 1

      There are also dedicated firewire/av boxes. The canopus box works well from what I've heard.

      Do not even think about using a dazzle hollywood. Unless they've fixed it, it likes to do things like switch randomly to PAL and in many cases won't capture properly, without something like a switcher upstream.

      --
      I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    2. Re:Protable and cheap if you have a decent laptop by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      To add one more camera to the list, my Canon ZR60 purchased for 500 USD a year and a half ago hass video pass-through. I frequently play old home movies from their tape, through my MiniDV and then, via IEEE 1394, to my computer.

  27. Re:Screw the hardware by akeyes · · Score: 1

    So, if you are using yourself as the hardware, and you say, "Screw the hardware"...

  28. Record direct to your laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, I'm not familiar with DV cameras that can record in SP and EP modes, sounds like this person is actually using an analog camera. But anyway...

    Use your firewire cable and record direct to a harddrive on a laptop. Assuming your laptop is powerfull enough you shouldn't have any problems with dropped frames and you can add an external drive if you have space limitations. I've done this in a pinch with Adobe Premier when I was out of tapes before. A 300Gb drive plus external enclosure will run around $250 these days, not to mention you won't have to waste time dumping video set for editing.

  29. Mac notebook + firewire? by autophile · · Score: 1
    How about getting a Mac notebook, and capture all your video from firewire direct into Final Cut?

    --Rob

    --
    Towards the Singularity.
    1. Re:Mac notebook + firewire? by pdbogen · · Score: 1

      Why does it have to be a mac? My Dell Inspiron 6000 has onboard firewire, and I can capture IEEE1394 video with linux.

    2. Re:Mac notebook + firewire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does it have to be a mac? My Dell Inspiron 6000 has onboard firewire, and I can capture IEEE1394 video with linux.


      He probably only suggested it because very few PCs have FireWire standard. It's not like a Mac is that much different that someone is going to be mislead by the suggestion anyway.

      Also, you aren't capturing "IEEE1394 video", no matter what camera, computer, or OS you're using. IEEE1394 is the interface. DV is the format.

    3. Re:Mac notebook + firewire? by jrumney · · Score: 1
      He probably only suggested it because very few PCs have FireWire standard.

      Few desktops have it as standard, but most laptops do.

    4. Re:Mac notebook + firewire? by ukleafer · · Score: 1

      It's not so much about getting the video onto the laptop, as being able to do something useful with it afterwards.

      *Yay* you can get your dv into linux, and we all salute the effort you probably have to put in in order to do so, but you're all but shafted as far as editing goes from there.

      Final Cut is the key word in the grandparent post.

    5. Re:Mac notebook + firewire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Yay* you can get your dv into linux, and we all salute the effort you probably have to put in in order to do so, but you're all but shafted as far as editing goes from there.

      No, not really

    6. Re:Mac notebook + firewire? by xsonofagunx · · Score: 1

      And in all reality, any desktop PC that's of worthwhile quality to be doing video editing should have firewire, SATA or SCSI interfaces, and over a GB of RAM. Even then, I can barely stand it. While computing power has gone up and up, completely demolishing almost all waiting for things to process (ripping a CD to MP3 in 15-20 minutes, for example. Considering how much is actually being done, the wait is negligable), video editing and encoding seem to be the only things that are still terribly tedious to do. I've got an Athlon 3200 with 1.5GB of RAM and I still have to set an encoding task of movie length to be worked on at night and go to bed, only to hope it will be done by noon or so the next day. Often it's still working even by then. What I really need is a decent sized cluster of PCs and a way of splitting up the work among them. I found a program called Vidomi for distributed encoding, and that looks promising, but since I don't have an array of computers at my disposal (yet) I haven't been able to test it at all. It still wouldn't help the actual editing though, unless perhaps I had a single PC with 4 dual-core processors or something... oh how I wish I had money. But as I'm presently broke (and in debt a few grand... thank you student loans...) it'll probably be years before I get to play with these ideas. Oh the thought of having a roomfull of computers with 4 dual-core processors and 4GB RAM a piece, and maybe 16 or so 15k RPM SCSI drives in a RAID array... ::cleans up self:: Anyways... uh... firewire and a laptop, with an external hdd... that's the ticket...

    7. Re:Mac notebook + firewire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize you could easily overclock your 3200+ (2000Mhz) to 2300 - 2400Mhz and shave a few hours off your encoding time right?

    8. Re:Mac notebook + firewire? by xsonofagunx · · Score: 1

      XP 3200s are ~2000Mhz? ::checks:: Yeah, that's right... so I guess that I'm really running between that and a 3400 (@ 2100Mhz). Same diff, but to answer you - no, I couldn't because it's really an Athlon XP 2500 Barton. Amazing how easy it is to go to a 200Mhz FSB :)

    9. Re:Mac notebook + firewire? by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      FCP is a stellar app, and the apps you link to don't really compare.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    10. Re:Mac notebook + firewire? by kbielefe · · Score: 1
      Does this list meet your standards, then? Or are Pixar, Dreamworks, and ILM just deluding themselves as well?

      I won't argue with you about the quality of FCP compared to open source offerings, having never used it myself. From what I've heard I'm sure it is a stellar app. However, the grandparent was pointing out that "all but shafted as far as editing goes" is certainly an unfair assessment of the video editing capabilities on linux, even if high end commercial apps like those in the list above are taken out of the mix.

      Kino is polished and easy to use. Although it has a very limited feature set, it is more than sufficient for something as simple as a conference or home video. Cinelerra is a little rough around the edges, but has a nice feature set and is easy to extend with plugins. Most of the difficulty in learning Cinelerra is because it is so full-featured. I can't speak to MainActor, as I have been too happy with the other two to fork out the money for it, but I'm sure it is a capable app. And all 3 of these are continuously getting better.

      And do I even need to mention price? For $999, FCP had better be good. With Cinelerra I have made high quality videos with keyframe animation, color correction, nice transitions, excellent audio filtering, 5 channel surround, compositing to remove unwanted elements from a scene, anti-aliased truetype titling, and more. I have even set up a small renderfarm. I'm not saying FCP isn't a good investment, but for me if the end product doesn't look any different with an open source NLE, why should I spend the money? Maybe if it saved a lot of time, but I honestly don't see where any time could be cut from an experienced user of any NLE.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    11. Re:Mac notebook + firewire? by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      I didn't mean to imply that those packages are without value, just that FCP was in a different class. I have spent a little time with Kino, and was impressed at the time, but really only because it was free. Your Cinelerra feature list is pretty impressive, I'll check that out next time. I'm a huge OSS advocate, but if you're doing a significant amount of work, the non-free option is often your best choice.

      I use the Gimp every week. I could reboot and use photoshop, but for most things the Gimp is good enough. But I still think the Gimp is kinda crappy compared to PS, and could be radically improved. I think sometimes the OSS community does itself a disfavour by trying to upsell the OSS projects out there as comparable to their professional counterparts when they aren't.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    12. Re:Mac notebook + firewire? by kbielefe · · Score: 1
      I think sometimes the OSS community does itself a disfavour by trying to upsell the OSS projects out there as comparable to their professional counterparts when they aren't.
      Well, often they are comparable for the situation. No one would argue that a Chevy Cavalier is better than a Ferrari, but what if all you need it for is taking the kids to school and buying groceries? Then you are just paying for a status symbol.

      I always recommend going with an open source solution until you come across a need that it doesn't provide. Then either implement it yourself (which I have done before), or find a commercial solution that will work better. Once you have already paid for commercial software, there is little sense in evaluating whether an open source package will meet your needs, unless you are facing yearly subscription or upgrade costs, or perhaps want to change operating systems for other reasons. Especially complex software like graphics or NLE, which have a large learning curve.

      It is a lot harder to convince a long-time FCP user of the benefits of cinelerra, even if they don't actually use anything that only FCP provides, just because of inertia. Conversely, I would have a difficult time moving to FCP right now, because of the time I have invested in cinelerra.

      However, look at a new user like my stepdad, who is not tech savvy, but wants to do something with the hundreds of hours of video he has recorded but never watched. I'm going to recommend something like Kino until he outgrows it, and he probably never will.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
  30. How about Supacam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I attended Siggraph in Los Angeles this week, and one company was offering a product that sounds like it would fit the bill per your question.

    Supacam is a pocket multicam that captures ditigal movies in mpeg-4 format to industry standard memory card. It can also function as a 6.5 megapixel camera, a stereo mp3 player, a video player, and an audio recorder.

    The camera is small enough to fit in your pocket, and with a 1 gig memory card can hold abiut 40 minutes of video, I believe.

    Cost at the show was $288, and comes with the camera, strap, case, tranfer cable, case, and software.

    More information can be found at http://www.supacam.com/

  31. Re:I think the problem is that tape is the cheapes by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1
    that's because you dumped the frames, Mini-DV is compressed, here, i stole this from wikipedia.
    DV uses DCT intraframe compression at a fixed bitrate of 25 megabits per second, which amounts to roughly 3.6 megabytes per second or 4 minutes per Gigabyte. At equal bitrates, DV is somewhat better than MJPEG (which is very similar), and is comparable to intraframe MPEG-2. Note that many MPEG-2 encoders for acquisition applications do not use intraframe compression.
  32. Re:I think the problem is that tape is the cheapes by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

    fuck, i guess i should have paid more attention to what i "read". sorry. you can mod me down.

  33. 2nd camera? by bscott · · Score: 1

    Depending on how pricey the cameras you're using are, I doubt you'll find a tapeless system that will give you cheaper and more flexible results than simply buying a second camera and mounting it next to the first one. You can switch tapes indefinitely without missing a beat, and if you're at the back of the room the shift in angle should be imperceptible. What's more, you'll always have a backup camera in case of hardware problems - that could save your hiney.

    A tapeless system using a hard drive or whatever has its uses but I don't think you'd be solving quite the problem you are facing here.

    --
    Perfectly Normal Industries
  34. Outsource by dj245 · · Score: 1

    Just hire an autistic person with the super memory "can't forget anything" function. Then have him or her describe the events later to you. Ultra reliable, lifetime guarunteed. No dropped frames. Quality might suffer a bit though.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Outsource by radiotyler · · Score: 1

      Definitely a good idea. Definitely. Definitely.

      --
      hi mom!
  35. Cheap vs quality, performance... by J.+Random+Luser · · Score: 1

    As others have posted these don't go together. I have this problem too, needing to video up to 2 hours of illustrated lectures, where there is no predictable midpoint to change tapes. How fast can you change the tape in a typical mini-dv? Under 90 seconds?

    I'm currently using an iBook with external f/w drive, with the power supplies and cables fit in an old VHS camera carry case. On MacOS 10.3 and iMovie you could run the f/w straight into iMovie with no tape in the camera. The upgrade to 10.4 and iMovieHD 5.02 broke this, it needs a tape in the camera now, carefully nursing thru pauses. Apple claim it should still work, but it broke for other ppl too, and I may be forced to upgrade my camera :-(

    1. Re:Cheap vs quality, performance... by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 1

      Or you could partition your laptop drive to have both 10.3 and 10.4, and only use 10.3 for the instances where you're capturing video. Seems like this would be a cheaper alternative to upgrading your camera.

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    2. Re:Cheap vs quality, performance... by nolife · · Score: 1

      I can change tapes in my Panasonic DV-15 camera and only miss about 20 seconds. You do not have to wait until the tape runs out to start a new one either. Once you get to the 50 minute point, jump at the chance when the lecturer is swapping slides or reaches for the glass of water. If you are only taping lectures and only need two hours, buy a $199 analog camera and record on EP speed. I know it sounds odd but try it first. I have been converting my old 8mm tapes to digital with my Radeon AIW. When all is said and done and I have the final product on a DVD and watching it on a television, there is almost no difference in video quality between the converted 8mm tapes and the video shot directly with my DV camera. Maybe my old ass Sony 8Mm was really good or my DV camera sucks. Either way...

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  36. Re:Portable and cheap if you have a decent laptop by djdj · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you can afford it, DV Rack is a great software solution for direct-to-disk capture. It has some neato tools to make sure you are getting the best picture you can. It also has this cool feature that constantly buffers video, so when you hit the record button on your camera, it actually records several seconds of video prior to pressing the button. Perfect for those times when something happens real fast and it takes you a second to react.

    Every DV camera I have ever used outputs video to the firewire port whenever the camera is on. I don't believe it is common to find one that doesn't.

    You can always capture directly into editing software too, but it is a little more cumbersome.

  37. Just user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your DV camera and a laptop and record direct to the laptop.

  38. QuickStream DV by TheSync · · Score: 1

    The MCE QuickStream DV comes with its own Lithium Ion battery. The 360 minute device is about $900.

  39. 15 minutes of pause by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    ...gummed up tape heads (especially prevalent when you spend more than fifteen minutes at a time on pause)...

    You should leave it on slow motion play or you could repeatedly hit the frame advance button with your non-occupied hand. ;-)

    1. Re:15 minutes of pause by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recording, not playing back. READ READ READ READ READ the damn article! It's not that much to ask.

  40. Two cameras? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um... Why not just get a second camera, and don't pause? Start the second camera when the first one's (almost) done. Like that.

  41. Recording to disk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As you can see from all the posts, it's quite simple to record to a hard drive. Any editing package--from the simple (iMovie, Movie Maker 2, et al) to the complex (Final Cut Pro, Avid, et al) has this function. So, get a good laptop (with firewire), choose the editor of your choice, and you're good to go.

    However, there are two things I would recommend based on the school of hard knocks. Don't record to the same drive upon which your operating system is operating. You are asking too much from a laptop drive to run the system, the editing package and write video. Buy a big external firewire drive (200GB+) and write to that. I use Lacie and have had great success, I'm sure others would work great too.

    Secondly, you should continue to record to tape too while recording to hard drive. When you are ready to change the tape you can switch it out and your editng system will still keep recording to drive (it's based off the feed, not the camera's start stop). The reason this is important is backup -- while infrequent, drives fail and operating systems hiccup and cause your editing program to freeze/crash, etc.

    I do this all the time and you are absolutely right in pursuing this approach -- it dramatically accelerates your workflow once you are done shooting.

  42. loosing vital footage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is that supposed to mean? What's the difference between "tight" and "loose" footage? I haven't heard that slang before.

  43. Try an Apple iBook by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

    they have FireWire built-in, and if you run OS X you can download Apple's FireWire SDK, which has a pretty functional DVHS application, which might accept DV (it accepts MPEG2-TS with no problem).

    I use an ancient blue-and-white G3 to record HD video off my cable box -- it's more than equal to that task, so an older iBook such as you might find on eBay should be sufficient.

  44. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    • Cheap
    • Tapeless
    • DV Capture

    Pick any two.

  45. Ahem by howsitgoingeh27 · · Score: 1

    yea.... most people seem to go with a the whole laptop thing, and yea if you have one sitting around its not a bad idea but i wouldn't touch such option with a ten foot pole. a laptop would be cumbersome, and its 5400 rpm drive would drop frames faster than you would probably end up droping the laptop. yea i know most of those recorders have 54oo rpm drives but they are a but more specialized. DV magazine loved the firestorm and the quickstream seems to give a lot for your money.

    1. Re:Ahem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually have a ThinkPad with dual 7.2krpm drives. You can swap the optical disk for a second HD adapter that fits in the same bay (on my model anyway). Just saying the HD situation isn't quite as bad as you make it sound.

    2. Re:Ahem by Mechcozmo · · Score: 1

      A 5400rpm drive will be fine. I have one in my PowerBook 12" G4 and have never had any problems. I have done very little live capture but capturing afterwards has always worked great, along with the editing.

  46. tapeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anyone else read that as topless.. man i need to fix my fonts.

  47. Firestore FS-4 Portable DTE recorder. by _dewman_ · · Score: 1

    It appears that all Canon camcorders are compatible with the Firestore FS-4.

    http://consumer.usa.canon.com/ir/controller?act=St andardDisplayAct&fcategoryid=102&keycode=camcorder _accessory

  48. "Events"? What events? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    The article mentions events, but doesn't say what they are.

    If they are some sort of audio-visual event are they not professionally recorded?

    If it is just some talking head, wouldn't a few stills and a transcript be better?

    I know, it wasn't the question, but who really wants to watch a 4 hour video of most "events"?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:"Events"? What events? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I think you can read between the lines and assume that the events are either Star Trek conventions, monthly meetings of the SCA, or circle jerks (this should provide the answer to your second question about talking heads).

      In regards to your last question, the answer could either be no one, or the Department of Homeland Security.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:"Events"? What events? by Morkano · · Score: 1

      I think the point is that he needs to record the whole thing so he can edit it down later. The more stock footage the better. And you don't want to miss a key moment while you're switching tapes.

      --
      Victory or awesome!
  49. Correcting a mistake and some info by gambit3 · · Score: 1

    1. LP does NOT decrease quality. Period. Look it up. There are reports that it DOES increase the possibilities of dropped frames but it does NOT decrease recording quality. The original poster is wrong.

    2. a) There are already ways of doing real-time storage... some not so easy. I just did it myself this July for a church conference, with a camcorder connected via firewire to a laptop, connected via firewire to an external drive. Not the best of solutions, and it pretty much eliminated mobility, but it gave me 3 hrs/night uninterrupted recording time.
        b) There already is a turn-key solution for this. It's called Firestore. It's a portable hard drive that captures real-time from a camera.
    http://www.focusinfo.com/products/firestore/fs-4.h tm

    1. Re:Correcting a mistake and some info by bani · · Score: 1

      in my book, dropped frames = decreased quality.

  50. Re:Portable and cheap if you have a decent laptop by bfizzle · · Score: 1

    That DV Rack is a pretty cool!

    Under $300 for a copy and the tools it provides could allow an amuater take professional quality video.

    Too bad I don't have mod points :(

  51. DV Rack software was made to do this by Markmarkmark · · Score: 5, Informative

    DV Rack (http://www.dvrack.com/ by Serious Magic runs on a laptop and was made to do exactly this plus it has automatic quality monitoring that watches video and audio levels in real-time alerting you when thresholds are exceeded. It also turns your laptop screen into a field monitor that lets you compare live camera to recorded clips in split screen (good for checking continuity/framing).

    There's an express version that lists for $149.

    Disclaimer: Yes, I work at the company but hey someone finally asked a question on Slashdot that requests exactly what a product that I worked on does.

    1. Re:DV Rack software was made to do this by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Yup, I was thinking of exactly your product :)

      I just wish you guys made a Mac version as well, because I got a free powerbook 15" from work :)

      BTW: I didn't know that Serious Magic was formed by the Play folk... I would've hung around the booth at NAB to shoot the bull more :P

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    2. Re:DV Rack software was made to do this by dubiousmike · · Score: 3, Informative

      DV Rack is definitely cool and works well as a field recorder. I have recorded the program out from toaster shoot using up to 8 cameras and I have yet to run into a problem. I use a dv camera that can do analog to digital pass through to get my live feed into my PC laptop. You can even pick an AVI for Premiere, or Quicktime for FCP and not have to do rendering once you bring it into your timeline.

      We also have an FS-2, an FS-1, and an FS-4 and dv rack is great if you don't have the funds for dedicated equiptment. It can help if your laptop has more than one dv port (get an expansion via your PCMCIA if need be) so you can transfer your 2 gig files from your laptop if you have to do long form stuff. I did a 3 day, 30 hour telethon with my laptop, a Lacie drive and DV Rack without problems. We used the recording to quickly encode to MPEG2 for our videoserver to playout over Comcast and to grab clips for promos for the next year.

      One thing, make sure you use it is bit as I found DV Rack's protection scheme caused some grey hairs when it kept asking for activation when I was on site and ready to go live without an internet connection and Serious Magic wasn't open on the weekend...

    3. Re:DV Rack software was made to do this by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      Another vote for DV Rack. I have never used it myself and have no connection whatsoever to the company, but it has a very good reputation with professionals in the video production message boards.

  52. tried this yesterday by lthown · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I actually have a similar issue as the root poster and found this solution myself. I hook my laptop up to my DV camers, turn it on and it stays on becuase the firewire is hooked up. Normally it turns off after 15 minutes but I tested it on Friday and captured 3 1/2 hours before the camcorder batter strted running down. This is perfect for long events. On a side note My laptop's HD is 60GB of which 40 are free (I cleared it out for this test) Just for fun, I setup Vegas' capture to use my 40GB USB drive (it's the drive that came in my laptop, only 4200RPM - in a little enclosure it's powerd off the USB) and it worked perfectly, not a dropped frame. Provided your batteried last long enough or you have a power port this should be able to go for 8 or more hours, just get more HD space. Sony Vegas (which is what I was using) can add a dozen or more drives and use them in sequence as they fill up. You can get a bunch of laptop crives and enclosures if you want to use the host battery - or 3.5" enclosures and regular 250-300GB drives if you're doing it with AC.

    1. Re:tried this yesterday by topham · · Score: 1

      My Canon will stay on for long periods, but only if there is no tape in the unit.

      If there is a tape it will power off unless it is recording something.

  53. 'thus loosing vital footage' by nih · · Score: 1

    > conventions

    > vital footage

    > error, does not compute

    --
    I'm a rabbit startled by the headlights of life :(
  54. chafing eh? a suggestion for you by capicu · · Score: 0

    Recently I've been chafing under the limitations of mini-DV tapes
    Listen, there's no point blaming the side-effects of your little "habit" on your choice of storage medium (it's for your "conventions"... suuuure).
    All you have to do is throw a little vaseline or baby-oil in there and you'll be back "on the road" in no time.

  55. miniDV EP is lower quality? Bwahahahaha!!! by FredThompson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    miniDV EP is the same quality as SP. The only difference is the tape speed. The data packets are the same.

    Dropouts? I've been using miniDV for years in an industrial environment and I never have dropouts. Your camera is gummed up as you've already explained.

    Always use fresh tapes for important events and record them, completely, with the lens cap on then rewind to retension and create a proper timecode on the entire tape. Don't reuse tapes, keep your camcorder clean and stick to one tape manufacturer.

    Pause for 15 minutes while recording? Huh?!?! Most camcorders shut themselves off. There's no good reason to be on pause for 15 minutes. Turn it off then back on.

    You don't need a HD. What you need is attention to detail and, it seems, a second camcorder and tripod. Record overlapping segments and do post-editing.

    1. Re:miniDV EP is lower quality? Bwahahahaha!!! by RonBurk · · Score: 1
      Always use fresh tapes for important events and record them, completely, with the lens cap on then rewind to retension and create a proper timecode on the entire tape.

      You came to expose one myth and reinforce another, it seems. That "proper timecode" idea is based on the incorrect assumption that the bits you layed down during the "blank record" will hit the record head in exactly the same spot when you later do your "real" record. Ain't gonna happen. Tapes sag and stretch, and only a minute amount of same is required to put those timecode bits in the wrong spot. By the time you're 30 minutes of tape into it, that original timecode just ain't gonna be in sync with what you're recording now.

      How about this instead: "pack" your blank tape by first fast-forwarding and then rewinding. If the manufacturer accidentally left a spot that was not firmly rewound, this *might* fix that. Then record about 30 seconds of blank tape (most tape damage allegedly occurs at the front, so you don't want your precious video to start there).

      Finally, the real rule on the timecode problem: Always start a new record by backing up a bit from the last one. This is a problem when you record in several pieces with some video reviewing in-between, not really a problem if you're just recording from start to finish in one sitting. If you know you're going to stop recording and review, just put the lens cap on and record an extra 10 seconds trailer. Be sure to position the tape into that trailer before you start recording again. That'll keep you from having messed-up timecodes.

      I never have dropouts.

      Maybe. Or maybe you just have software/hardware that can't or won't inform you of dropouts. Maybe you're getting dropped frames here and there all the time and you just never know the difference.

    2. Re:miniDV EP is lower quality? Bwahahahaha!!! by rthille · · Score: 1

      The thing about prerecording the entire tape is that when you go to record anything later, the camcorder will read the timecode you laid down previously and continue it. This keeps you from having to record over the last bit of what you recorded previously to keep a consistent timecode on that tape.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    3. Re:miniDV EP is lower quality? Bwahahahaha!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a myth. Read some up to date DV websites.

    4. Re:miniDV EP is lower quality? Bwahahahaha!!! by baka_vic · · Score: 1
      Finally, the real rule on the timecode problem: Always start a new record by backing up a bit from the last one. This is a problem when you record in several pieces with some video reviewing in-between, not really a problem if you're just recording from start to finish in one sitting. If you know you're going to stop recording and review, just put the lens cap on and record an extra 10 seconds trailer. Be sure to position the tape into that trailer before you start recording again. That'll keep you from having messed-up timecodes.

      If you're using a Sony camcorder, there is usually a button labelled as "End Search", which when pressed, will rewind/forward the tape to where you left off. One thing to remember though, is that opening the tape compartment will make the cam "forget" the end position of the tape. To avoid this when changing tapes, press the "End search" button before changing. I think the other brands also have a similar feature, just by a different name.

    5. Re:miniDV EP is lower quality? Bwahahahaha!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using 2 DV cameras, connected via firewire... one as a VCR, the other shooting the event... you can overlap by a minute and never miss a second. Theoretically you could record endlessly this way... as long as your batteries held out.

      I routinely do this at seminars. It works quite well and your second camera need not be an expensive one since all it's doing is recording the DV stream.

      I'd definently recommend this over the tapeless solutions, although it probably requires more constant attention.

      Tapeless solutions have too much that can go wrong compared to tape.

    6. Re:miniDV EP is lower quality? Bwahahahaha!!! by rthille · · Score: 1

      It's not a myth. It _may_ not be a problem with more recent hardware, but with _my_ Sony DCR-TRV9 it _is_ a problem.
      And I find it unlikely that even with recent mini-DV cameras that if you fast forward past the end of the recorded part of the tape that the camera will lay down consistent timecode.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  56. Dending on the quality you need... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    The firm I work for does video traffic recordings for counts and analysis. For years, we used Sony Real-Time VCRs, which are capable of a super LP mode of 3x EP. After investigating industrial digital video recorders for over a year, my boss found that they are almost always encrypted because they are intended to be tamper-proof for security monitoring, etc, which doesn't help if you want to make a copy of what you recorded, and is a stupid idea regardless, because you have to put an entire recorder in an evidence locker rather than a tape or a hard-disk...

    Anyhow, I mentioned the consumer-level devices like the Archos, etc, as a complete stab-in-the-dark suggestion. He picked up a couple and we spent a couple months experimenting and adapting and found that we could use an Archos AV-400 with a couple of those big old lead-acid batteries for literally days of continuous recording. Of course, it's far from broadcast quality, but I'm too lazy to RTFA so I don't know what you need it for. Anyhow, at 512x384, DivX-encoded with a time-stamp character generator patched in, it works nearly perfectly for our use, and saves us the very lengthy step of digitizing a video tape.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  57. Re:Portable and cheap if you have a decent laptop by jrumney · · Score: 1
    Every DV camera I have ever used outputs video to the firewire port whenever the camera is on. I don't believe it is common to find one that doesn't.

    I'd have thought so too. They need the capability in playback mode for transfering tape to PC, so why not use it in record mode as well?

  58. ultimate portable media solution by v1 · · Score: 1

    For portability, get an isight camera and a 12" powerbook, upgraded to a 100 (or 120 if you can find it) GB hard drive. Run iMove to capture your video.

    Be prepared to go grab lunch and wait while the video "finishes" recording after the presentation - that cleanup it does when you hit Stop will take quite awhile for a four hour recording. (probably 30 minutes or more?)

    Then do any editing you need to via iMovie (cutting out breaks, inserting text overlays at the start/end, transitions, etc) then export to whatever format suits you. You'll save yourself a lot of headache having to import the video into a computer later to do the editing and cleanup anyway.

    Be sure you bring your power adapter - 4 hours is asking a lot of even a powerbook battery.

    If you can stand a little less portable and quite a bit more expensive, go with a 17" powerbook instead. You'll fall in love with the large screen the first day out.

    This is definitely not the cheapest solution out there, but it is arguably one of the best.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:ultimate portable media solution by reiggin · · Score: 1

      Are you seriously suggesting using an iSight instead of a REAL camera? An iSight is DEFINITELY not designed for anything more than video conferencing. This is absolutely positively no subsitute for even the most low-end prosumer camera. No control, no zoom, no nothing. I'm pretty sure the guy who asked this Slashdot question is in need for more than just a pseudo-spycam set-up.

    2. Re:ultimate portable media solution by v1 · · Score: 1

      I realize the iSight is classified as a "web cam", but have you actually taken a look at video shot with an iSight, or are you just passing judgement based on it being a "web cam"? It's also auto white balance, auto contrast, auto focus. About the only thing it won't do compared to a high end camcorder is anti-jitter.

      Actually, more surprising than the video quality is the audio quality. The mic in that camera is incredibly good. I'm used to using the built-in mic in my powerbook and the iSight's mic quality is stunning.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    3. Re:ultimate portable media solution by reiggin · · Score: 1
      The guy who posed the question is talking about videoing conventions. Hardly the proper field of use for an iSight. No decent zoom and I'm guessing that the CCD's aren't up to snuff for the lighting situations in convention centers and hotel meeting rooms. And "auto white balance" is not a selling point, IMO. I much prefer my warm cards. "Auto" in general won't help you out when you need to play with shutter speeds, exposure settings, etc. Tv and Av are my friends. And the lack of "anti-jitter" is also a no-go. I seriously doubt the person posing the question just sits up a tripod at a convention and lets the thing record for 4 hours with no movement. Unless there's a shoulder mount or steady stick bracket for the iSight, I'm thinking he's in need of a bit of a larger camera.

      I'm not trying to talk down to you at all. It's just that I am a videographer and I'm quite sure there's no way a guy who does this stuff for a living can ever get by with just an iSight and a laptop and iMovie. Even if it is "just conventions." And then there's the whole issue of the fact that the guy is looking for professional solutions for his profession. I know I wouldn't dare try filming an event (wedding, convention, or otherwise) with something as untested as what you're suggesting. Not to mention, I think it's always prudent to use the equipment that is designed for the job. My clients expect that. I'm pretty sure that if he walked past the convention chairman with an iSight in hand and laptop tethered to it, he'd be hard-pressed to sign any more contracts with him for future engagements.

    4. Re:ultimate portable media solution by darkonc · · Score: 1
      If you want really long-term semi-mobile power for your laptop and camera, you can get an inverter (used to be StatPower, but they've now been sold to another name) .. Ah. xantrex. The XPower Xantrex 175 can provide 140 watts continuous (175 for 5 minutes). That's enough for most P4s and a camcorder. You can then run that off of a 12 volt jell cell battery that'll beat your average laptop battery to a whispy pulp (both figuratively and physically).

      I used a similar setup 10 years ago to allow long-term recording out in the bush. it also allows you to run off of vehicle accessory power for effectively infinite recording. (really nice for recharging semi-mobile equipment on long road trips, too).

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  59. Firewire HDD Pack... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I forget what the brand name is, I can get back to you on monday, but at my old school district (where I still work for the summer) the video producer has a external mini-hard drive thing. I think its about 60gig. It has several firewire ports, both the bigger 6 pin, and the smaller 4 pin. We use this when we record a lot to go straight to the drive via firewire instead of using tape. It has its own battery pack, can plug into a car power outlet (cigerrette lighter) or has a regular wall adapter. It is actually pretty nice. Again, I forget what the brand is, but I'll find out monday and repost, so check back. Also, I think it might have been between $500 to $1000, but it was worth it in my opinion. Tho that is only a estimate.

    (P.S. my name on here is sedorox, but it doesn't seem to wanna take my password :P)

  60. Direct-to-Disk Recorders available, but pricey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There are plenty of solutions out there, but they're all fairly expensive (Between $600 and $3000). The reason for this is that they're targetted at professional users.

    The cheap solution: You can hook your camera's firewire port directly to a laptop, and have your video software do direct recording, but you have to carry around the laptop, and deal with all the trouble that entails. If you're doing any sort of moving around, this likely more trouble than it is worth. The good news is that you don't have to take time to download the video to your computer for editing.

    If you don't use a computer, you need a hard driver recording system. Unfortunately, your average firewire enclosure is too basic to know what to do with a DV stream, so just plugging a firewire drive into your camera won't work.

    The following companies (not a complete list) make standalone devices that include a built-in hard drive, battery, and the logic to capture the firewire stream directly to disk:
          ADS Technologies (PyroDV)
          DataVideo (DV Bank)
          Focus Enhancements (Firestore FS-3, FS-4)
          Sony (DSR-DU1)

    B&H search for "video hard disk recorders" gives a decent listing:

    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O= NavBar&A=search&Q=&ci=6544

  61. There are issues with using a dv cam and a laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just did an event where i needed to stream video from a DV cam. The issue there was that I could not find a DV cam of any format that would not go either into sleep or demo modes if left alone for more than 15 minutes. The only way to get past this was to pop in a tape and record, but that brought the tape length limitation back into play.

    I eventually used an old CCD-TV3 from Sony, a high-8 commercial camera I had laying around and a capture device that could take NTSC via a RCA cable. It worked fine. I have not found a DV camera that does not go into either sleep (Panasonic, JVC) or demo mode (Sony), there seems to be no way to disable this. Any suggestions?

    -GReg

  62. Tapeless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...isn't all it's knocked up to be. Electronics are prone to failure; this is why my station records all shows on 1" tape as a backup. The Sony MAV fails. Often.

    Sure tapes are a little work, but tit-for-tat, tapes are still a reliable medium. They have been for a long time. And until everybody you work for adopts tapeless, you must still keep the tape deck around anyway, so what's the point? If you adopt tapeless and your clients don't, you have to dub -- thereby eliminating any performance gain ten times over!

    I know a specific PBS show that shoots on HDCAM in preference to any tapeless system. Even though HDCAM stock is notoriously expensive and takes up a lot of space (this show has a whole room full of tapes in my building), it works much better for them than tapeless ever would. The assistant editor dubs the footage to Unity, where the editor works on it, and then has the assistant editor dub out his edited show. So if anything, working from tape opens up a job for a college intern.

  63. This is what you need: FireStore by mikejz84 · · Score: 1

    The product you want is called the firestore http://www.videoguys.com/FireStore.html Its a portable Hard drive product that is made just for your needs.

  64. Solution by marleyboy · · Score: 1

    Buy another camera and start it rolling as the end of the tape on one nears the end. Use your timecoding to match up properly when you pull it to computer.

    --
    Neutiquam erro
  65. You should be hanged. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its not DV, but that's what VirtualDub is for.

    Uhhhhghghgh. You're talking about converting lossy intraframe-compressed DV into lossy interframe-compressed MPEG-4 into lossy interframe-compressed DV, over an analog connection, for the low-low price of $400, which could easily be put towards the mere $900 of a DV-based firewire solution, which would preserve DV quality from start to finish.

    If that's what VirtualDub is for...no thanks.

  66. DV Recorder Question by parkov · · Score: 1
    Along similar lines, it's possible to have a DV camcorder act as a VCR and then transfer it over FireWire to a Mac for editing.

    I'm wondering if there's an affordable consumer product out there that acts solely as a VCR, but has a FireWire output for the digital data, without the video camera mechanisms that make DV camcorders more expensive.

    1. Re:DV Recorder Question by Pfhor · · Score: 1

      Short answer:
      No.

      The only people who make DV-Decks make them for pros, since they assume the consumers are just going to load from their cameras over firewire. The cheapest DV deck i've seen is around $800 and its an S-HVS + MiniDV deck It would actually be cheaper just get a Dedicated DV camera that can do video pass throu (or even a digital 8 camera).

  67. Smallish Device for DV Recording by Marshall+Q · · Score: 1

    FYI I have read recently that the new Sony Playstation will have a DV Editing suite available as a hard disk add-on. It apparantley has some kind of underlying IOS, which the OS sits on top of. I believe there are currently three different OS's made, the gaming one by Sony, a specialist DV editing one, and a Linux one, so I'd guess you could set up with that? Also you could probably make a portable box with it in it along with a car battery and an inverter that may enable it to be semi portable for you.

  68. FireStore by gcondon · · Score: 1

    I do a lot of Public Access TV and we use older 80GB FireStores to capture the FireWire output from our Canon GL2 cameras. It works pretty well - it only takes a couple of minutes to set up and 80GB holds 5 hours and 45 minutes (enough for even the longest Town Meeting marathons). They come with a little nylon carrying case that allow you to sling it from your shoulder or attach it to your belt - a real plus for mobile shoots.

    Since the FireStore uses a FAT filesystem, the individual segments are 1.99GB each which, if I remember correctly, translates to 9 minutes plus change of DV25 video. However, you can also add your own segment marks with the push of a button (up to 99 segments per bin, up to 99 bins on the device ... to keep our 2 cameras / firestores straight, we always record into bin 11 on camera 1 and bin 22 on camera 2).

    After you are done recording, you have to tell the device to convert the raw files to AVIs. This can take 5-10 minutes depending on how much you recorded. After that, I copy the files to my PowerBook (another 10-15 minutes) and I am ready to edit in Final Cut Express. Although the conversion and transfer times add up, it is still better than transcoding and/or rendering.

    The only drawback is the price - when we got ours they were $999 each. It seems pretty steep for what is really not much more than a hard disk (and only an 80GB one at that). However, in the final analysis, I think that they have been more than worth it. We've been using both our units at least once a week for 2 years and have never had the slightest problem (even in the hands of some pretty computer-phobic users). Since I have yet to see any alternatives in this thread that is really any cheaper or easier (and the laptop solutions are definitely less mobile), I'd say that the FireStore is one of the best options.

  69. 2.5" HD for video? why not 3.5" HD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I notice most of these video capture HD solutions are 2.5". I have seen external 3.5" HD that go up to 350 gb. This seems like a more ideal solution for DV. Although, I have not found a 3.5" HD that is desigend for DV (power through hot shoe, etc.) Really 3.5" is not that much bigger than 2.5" but they offer much more space than the 2.5"/laptop solution. Crossing the .5 TB mark now.

  70. Video Hard Disk Recorders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should check this out. I'm sure that there are other brands, but this one seems to fit the bill.

    http://www.lairdtelemedia.com/Product.asp?cat=VIDE OEQUIP&subcat=&prodClass=VHDISK&search=0&off=0&bas eItem=LTM-CPDV3B

  71. mini-itx by Deadplant · · Score: 1

    I suppose this solution is a little bigger/more cumbersome than the solutions you mentioned but...
    I've built a mini-itx system (fanless) with firewire and a 250gig hdd.
    I then had my roomate build me a little device to connect a button and a set of LEDs to the internal rs232 port. I can control the LEDs and read the button presses from a python script running on the system.

    With this setup I have a small/quiet machine (hold in one hand) that is very easy to use.
    There's a power button and a record button, the LEDs show you when it's recording and how much drive space is left.
    250gigs divided by 12.5GB/hour for DV gives me 20 hours of continuous/lossless DV capture (no more glitches from tape read/write problems)
    When I get back to the office I just plug the machine into the lan and load the AVIs across the network directly into Premiere.

  72. Ewww... choose your tools by porneL · · Score: 1
    I use Windows movie maker just because it's what came with my laptop.

    Ewww... you're that kind of lazy consumer that helps Microsoft to monopolize market.

    For video postprocessing I recommend VirtualDub - very fast, powerful, free, open-source.

    1. Re:Ewww... choose your tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought VirtualDub was windows-only...

      Have you tried:
    2. Re:Ewww... choose your tools by timecop · · Score: 0

      Nice try, but VirtualDub does *NOT* support capture from 1394 devices.

      And, VirtualDub capture interface is still based on VFW technology (the old win9x video interface) instead of directshow, so it's getting more and more obsolete each year.

      So, for his purposes, windows movie maker IS the proper solution unless he wants to buy/search for other DV capture software, because it DOES support DV capture from 1394.

  73. Use a Laptop by MBoffin · · Score: 1

    I just had to solve this exact problem. I had to record a potentially 3-hour commencement and did not want to rely on 1-hour DV tapes. I researched what it would take to get my laptop to be the video capture device. I wrote up my result in my Backpack.

    Direct to Disk Video Recording

    I hope you can find it useful.

  74. Jaded? by __aabwba5127 · · Score: 1

    Geez man you sound so cynic, so disabused, so jaded... Bet you can't see any motive other than $VAGUE_REASON or $CONTRADICTORY_REASON... Looks like you suspect $POORLY_CONCEIVED_AMBITIONS in everybody... You got a good case of $POORLY_HIDDEN_CYNISIM going on!

  75. Re:Use a Laptop (new URL) by MBoffin · · Score: 1

    Sorry about that... the URL for the shared version of that page should be:

    http://mboffin.backpackit.com/pub/66066

  76. On that note, why use consumer? by IcEMaN252 · · Score: 1

    I agree with the parent, you need to use the equipment properly. But, you also need to use the right equipment.

    Although consumer grade mini-DV equipment is pretty good, if you're trying to do anything real, you need real equipment. A DVCAM or DVCPRO camaera not only produces a higher quality recording, it also uses better, longer, tapes. If consumer grade equipment doesn't work, it's better to use better equipment than hack the junk to make it work.

    --
    CitrusTV (http://www.citrustv.net): the Nation's Oldest & Largest Entirely Student-Run Television Station
    1. Re:On that note, why use consumer? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Personally I would look at it as: If tape sucks then go to disk. He's not complaining about the quality of the image captured by his sensor he's complaining about the limitations/perceived problems of tape. The expensive part of a digital imaging solution should be the lens(es) and imaging device, not the storage. HDD's are at $0.50/GB or less, so the problem is merely to figure out a way to attach the storage to the imager, not how to get a better lens/imaging device/tape system. Hell, LTO3 tapes are 400GB which will give you more storage than any digital camera tape spec that I am aware of, so shoot to HDD and backup to LTO3. Sure LTO3 tapes and drives are expensive, but they are cheap compared to investing in a Pro level digital system!

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  77. And your field masters will be....what? by snStarter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When contemplating using an HD instead of DV tape I'd suggest that you ponder what you're losing: a field master.

    I'm a Final Cut Pro user and when I bring tape into my system the first thing I do is LOG it. Then I can select what I want to capture. The tape gets write protected, of course, properly labelled, and now I can simply save my project files. At the end of a project I can discard the captured video. It's merely a matter of popping in a few tapes should I need to recapture the project.

    This saves a TON of disk space that otherwise you're going to have to hold onto - or you'll lose the footage you chose not to keep (but which might be very useful). I've had no problem over five years in retrieving old footage. Yes - you might need to keep a lot of tapes but they are small.

    your milage, of course, may vary -- but I recommend you have your camera cleaned and aligned and maybe treat it a little better - respect the tools you want to giv eyou good results is always a good idea.

    1. Re:And your field masters will be....what? by kbielefe · · Score: 1
      You are the first response I have seen that sounds like you actually have done this before.

      In addition, I would mention reliability and backup. All cameras and hard drives eventually break. Except in extremely rare circumstances, a camera breaking is not going to ruin anything you have already taped. If the computer capturing the video crashes, you are probably going to lose at least the last few minutes. If the hard drive physically crashes, the whole day is gone.

      I don't know anyone who uses a firestore-type device that doesn't also use tape as a backup. They love the time it saves in capturing, but also realize that one day the hard drive is going to crash in the middle of someone's wedding vows or something and they will be glad for the tape.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
  78. get the firestore by lavaface · · Score: 1

    You should be able to find an 80GB firestore pro for about $1000. While it is a bit pricey, the cost is well worth the time saved capturing footage. If this is a problem you regularly run into, a 1000 dollar investment is not so bad. Others have mentioned using a laptop. While this is certainly an option, the cost will be comparable but your portability is limited. The firestore can fit on a beltclip for mobile shots and will fit in a camera bag. A laptop will probably require another ~6lb bag to carry. Another way to consider the issue--the firestore's price is approximately equal to 200 minidv tapes. After 200 hours of footage, you start coming out ahead with the portable solution. I doubt you could homebew a device with comparable reliability for significantly less money.

  79. Here you go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  80. use DVCAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use a DVCAM camera. It uses DV or DVCAM tapes. There are larger than miniDV ones and can easily store 4 hours of video. (e.g. the Panasonic AY-DV276AMQ).

    DV tapes are not that much more expensive.

  81. FIRESTORE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firestore is a solution for most DVcam stuff, and its integrated with the JVC-DV5000.

    Its pretty rad.

    yeah.

  82. Get out of videography completely by Fastball · · Score: 1

    This is a profession that takes too much 1) time, 2) money, and 3) patience. You will spend every moment of your weekend and evenings editing video. You will burn GDPs worth of cash in order to store your video and build a computer that can cut and render it. And yet you'll still "botch" somebody's wedding or seminar, because your customer is the next Stanley Kubrick and you're just a bitchass with a camera and a swinging dick.

    Save yourself this grief now. Get out.

  83. Re: A pro's opinion by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    I've used FireStore and mac laptops and various firewire drives and configurations.

    Firestores and their rip-offs are perfect for killing video tape; however, they cost a lot.

    A firestore starts at $700 for 40GB and doesn't run on batteries (costs more for battery.) You can get a n ibook for that kind of money!

    The iBook is much better, you can do (simple) editing with iMovie. You can boot it up into Disk mode, and the iBook becomes a firewire drive.

    The EXPENSIVE firestore devices are more portable.

    NTSC DV is about 12.5 GB/hr

  84. Re: iBook hack for video by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    You can open the iBook up and remove the magnetic sensor that detects the lid shutting, then you can run the laptop in a backback and have it still recording. Most those firestore-like drives have no more drive shock protection than a laptop.

    Maybe someone has an OS hack to disable the lid sleep thing?

    FYI: any firewire iBook will work, and you can put in a LARGE 2.5 ide drive... used "slow" ibooks can be found cheap.

    Otherwise, I've been interested in a FreeBSD one, since I've seen there is a DV capture program out there for it. But finding a small cheap firewire laptop pc in the iBook price range is difficult.

  85. How about optical media camcorders by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

    Sony have XDCAM that records onto 23GB Optical media, Professional Disc for Data.
    The discs are about $30 a pop, you can get a PDD drive for your computer, or use the camera via FireWire either as a VTR style device, or in file access mode, where you see the files on the disc. It's non-linear and very rugged. You can pause for as long as you like with no wear and tear. There's no need to then capture the footage to your computer, as it's already there, on the disc, ready to use in your editing software. Discs are cheap, when you have those 15 minute pauses, switch discs, even if it's not full, that way you'll never run out of space - no-one will be talking for over an hour and a half, continuously.

  86. Other Notebook Benefits by Pitr · · Score: 1

    The firestore seems to have a lot going for it, but it has a ~90 minute battery life. If this is a concern, a notebook with 2 battery bays, plus extra batteries you can hot swap, might be the best way to solve your problem. If portability is a big problem, then the firestore with an extension cord, or some other power extention device would seem best. But it sounds like continuous run time is your greatest concern.

    You could always just connect a firestore to a cart with a bunch of daisy chained UPSes. ;)

    --

    --Not to be worried, Pitr fix.
  87. I don't know what you use pause for... by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    but I usually use pause when I leave for a while, which can be for more than 15 minutes, I used to press stop frequently back in the old days of VCRS, and pause usually kicked to stop after awhile, anyways back in those days. These days hitting stop makes the whole thing start over at the beginning, but he's still talking about tape, so why isn't he using stop for durations that long?

    1. Re:I don't know what you use pause for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The posters problem is that he has been mixing brands of tape in his camera. The different formulations react against each other and cause the heads to gum up with debris.

      You should stick to one brand of tape and that is it. That is the advice most video professionals give from a vast amount of experience (me being one of those people).

      If the recording is critical consider using mini DV-CAM tapes. These look like standard DV tapes but have a different formulation and are designed for the higher quality professional DV-CAM format. But there is nothing stopping you using them in a standard DV camera. OK so you loose the benefits of the DV-CAM codec, but the tape will be far more robust.

      But whatever you do, stick to one brand of tapes only!

  88. DV VCR by Logger · · Score: 1

    Check out JVC's DV3000U

    It's not dirt cheap. But a good value for what you want to do. It also will allow you to retain your tape as the original archive footage. A Final Cut user pointed out earlier the usefulness of that.

    A 4 hour tape runs list price $55.

    I say stick with tape unless you are willing to through away your footage. Then you could go with a disk based appoach.

  89. One possible idea by sootman · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I didn't read every word of your post--it was pretty long. Hopefully the brevity of my answer will make up for my inattention. If you hook up a DV camera to an Apple laptop, you might be able to use iMovie, QuickTime Broadcaster, Final Cut or something else to capture directly from the camera to disk. At 9.5 minutes for 2 GB of DV (maybe higher in Final Cut) you would need 50 GB of disk space for 4 hours, so a 60 or 80 GB PowerBook should do the trick.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  90. Don't get a DV camera by poptones · · Score: 1

    Get instead a camera that is ONLY a camera. Go to linuxdevices.org and search for "camera" and you will find various models that come with lens mounts and a tcpip port. They're only about a thousand dollars and you can connect one to any PC you want. If a pair of 500GB drives in a RAID cannot meet your time needs, build two 1TB PCs and let software do the "swapping" in real time.

  91. Strongly suggest DV magazine by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    For the past 2 years anyone that has been serious in video have known about the Firewire hard drive recording decks that are available, and recording to your laptop is always do-able. Personally I only see DV tape problems with misused equipment and low end gear. and changing a tape at the 60 minute mark is not a hassle. (Note if you are recording a segment longer than 20 minutes, you are going to bore the hell out of people.)

    I suggest starting with good gear, taking care of it, and picking a good tape and stick with it. My XL1's only ever have sony excellence DV tapes in them and almost never have dropouts. hell I wore out a complete tape transport in one of my XL1 cameras and never had a "gummed up" video head problem.

    The portable hard drive recorders that are available that plug into the firewire will cost you a minimum of $900.00 without a hard drive. so unless you are shooting with high end gear (and from what I read in your post you're not) I suggest buying a new $300.00 DV camera every 6 months and call it done. That is your absolute cheapest solution with the highest portability and useability.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  92. 82min in SP by kangman · · Score: 1

    hello... 82min in SP... obviously your not much of a videography with your 15min pauses but there are mini-dv tapes from Panasonic that goes to 276 minutes so please don't talk about no 82 minutes in SP mode!

    --
    sig here
    1. Re:82min in SP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      276 minutes is a full size DV, not mini-dv.

      See here.

  93. Re:I think the problem is that tape is the cheapes by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    No, that doesn't explain it. At 3.6MB/min one hour of footage ought to be about 13GB, without overhead, regardless of whether it's on tape or on a hard drive.

    Assuming that the guy didn't actually transcode it from DV to MJPEG, then there's no reason why it should have ballooned in size like that. AVI is just a container format, it can easily have the DV data inside of it, without re-compressing each frame to MJPEG. Unless AVI adds a huge amount of overhead to the DV data, as compared to Quicktime or some of the other container formats.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  94. Well, I would be wary... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I know my old Powerbook 667 Mhz is perfectly capabile of capturing video with no dropped frames. But one of the reasons I bought a powerbook was that I was fed up with trying to make PC's behave as stabily.

    Perhaps direct firewire dumps will owrk pretty well on the PC... but then of course there's the issue of noing being able to use Final Cut (or even iMovie) on the video when you are done which would be pretty useful. A Mini while not the ideal box for video would work well enough for someone on a budget with a little time.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  95. http://www.scenalyzer.com/ by wirehead_rick · · Score: 1

    http://www.scenalyzer.com/

    I've been using this SW for years. Put it on a laptop with Firewire. Connect your DV cam to the laptop via Firewire. Hit Capture.

    It will record until the Hard Drive is full. It can automatically splice the capture into multiple files to handle any file size limitations (good for file management. Who wants one giant file? Too difficult to manage for edits afterwards).

    It is also good for intelligent captures off of tapes in which you might have done on the fly editing. It has some neat effects (time lapse capture can be fun) as well.

    Finally, it is pretty cost friendly ($39). And I would recommend you run the trial version to see if you like it first.

    Pretty easy. What else could you want?

    --
    -- Mean People Suck
  96. G00 is your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the vein of "just google for $OBSCURE_TERMS", try:

    "dv camcorder record to firewire hard disk"

    Then you'll discover the even easier:

    "firestore" and hit "I'm Feeling Lucky".

  97. JVCs are junk! by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    JVCs are junk. At least this is my experience. I have a JVC DVL-505u, and it has given me nothing but troule -- I should have spent the extra $200 and got a canon. Granted, this was a while ago.

    I'm into digital video. I used to work with ancient Macintosh computers, back in the days of MJPEG analog capture cards, about the time Premiere 2 came out. Ad nauseum, I'm into portable video, especially as gagetty as I am.

    I'm looking for a digital camcorder which does 720x480, or x486 -- I think the extra 6 aren't needed if you are not capturing from an analog source. I'm also looking for MPEG2 or better. Compact Flash formats have disks of -- what, 4 gigs? I'll settle for SD or MMC.

    There are a couple units like the Canon S2, this thing, and others. I didn't find a link to this ultra generic model. They're all 640x480, which bothers me.

    Here, have a bunch of opinionated spooge.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  98. iSight + iPod by wirefarm · · Score: 1

    Or, conversely, you could just plug your iSight into your iPod photo and install that firmware hack that was floating around the net a while back to record mpeg-2 streams.

    Of course, with an iSight, you can't zoom and the focus tended to be unreliable, but it might fit the bill...

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  99. Hack a TiVo to do the job ... by slapphappe · · Score: 1

    ... you might even consider the model with a DVD burner in.

  100. Get a laptop? by dasdrewid · · Score: 1

    Get a laptop with firewire and get something like Cinelerra or FCP, then just plug the camera into the laptop and use the direct capture in the software to record. You'll be able to record for as much disk space as you've got (use usb2 or firewire if you want to add an external drive for more space). That should work fine.

    --
    No trespassing. Violators will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
  101. DV firewire hard disk storage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a few direct to hard disk products available that exceed your time req. and allow you to directly edit the video you shot.

    I own a prod. company and buy most of my stuff from B & H photo out of NYC. Focus has one product at:
    http://www.focusinfo.com/products/firestore/fs-4.h tm

  102. Sony camcorder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Sony camcorder. The little 'memory stick' that it came with is able to record 4MB of information (20 pictures or about 10 seconds of video). It's a bit annoying because it's so tiny, but I've seen memroy sticks come out that can hold 2GB. Pause isn't a problem. If you do the math 2GB is more than 90 minutes of video. Two memory sticks and two batteries, and you have 180+ minutes of total recording time, with one interruption in between, and no tapes.

  103. Record to an external drive by chemacguevara · · Score: 0

    just get a ADVC with a large external firewire drive and a cheap analog camcorder that will stay on input without going into powersaving mode (essentially throughput without genereration loss of analog tape) and record to a laptop using the many apps that are availabe regardless of OS. ie quicktime pro 7, dv grab, and whatever the equivalent that the piece of shit OS microsoft has.

    --
    Republicans are jackballs...there, I said it!
  104. motion detection saves tape by chemacguevara · · Score: 0

    use motion detection so that valuable tape time doesn't get wated when the genius' you are filming are all standing around with their thumbs up their asses waiting for the crowds obvious approval, applause, adoration and general ass kissing.

    --
    Republicans are jackballs...there, I said it!
  105. Loosing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...thus loosing vital footage."

    Can anyone in the world spell this friggin' word correctly? It's LOSING,, not LOOSING!

    LOSING: It means that you are unsuccessful at retaining possession of something.

    LOOSING: It means to make something less tight, or to detach.

  106. This is unfortunate. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    I purchased a DX-97U a little while ago, remanufactured, and it hasn't worked once - been in the shop on warranty repair the entire time. Apparently there was some problem with the playback heads AND the tape ejection/loading mechanism.

    The sad thing is that when it works, it's a BEAUTIFUL camera that produces a FANTASTIC image - especially in low light. Those Canons are great outdoors, but until very recently (and hence, very expensively) have had piss-poor image quality indoors.

    My criteria for a camcorder were:

    1) Must be good indoors
    2) Must have a mic-in jack (because camcorder built-in audio sucks, uniformly)
    3) There is no number 3.

    This unit was the only one I could find that matched these specs at a reasonable price. Unfortunately I ended up screwing myself in the bargain.

    --

    +++ATH0
  107. Re:Illiterate cretin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "You loose vital footage (or shoould that read fooootage?) do you? Well it seems yoou suck, looser! Fook yoou and the hoorse you roode in on. "

    Good flame, buddy!

  108. i love my casio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All these new digital cameras may not
    have the functionality of a full video camera...
    but my casio z750 is a great compact 7mega pixel
    camera that can record video at a decent 640x480 @ 30fp in mpeg4... about 17mins on a 512meg sd
    card at max quality... where it misses on fuctions
    its the ultimate on convenience and price...

    btw has slashdot turned into lazy writers google?

  109. Lyra or Archos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get one of the 80Gb (or more) versions of the LyraAV or Archos. These can take 3xPhono inputs and record for hours and hours. Then hook up your camcorder to its TV-Out (a 3xPhono output) and buy 3 Phono F-F adapters. You can now record directly to your video jukebox, at whatever quality settings you like, and your only limitation is battery life. If you have an AC outlet near you, you're set.
    The video is even stored in avi or mpeg format so you can set up VideoLan to stream it from your website straight away.
    Have a nice day :)

  110. stop being a cheapass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    obviously you do this to make money.

    if you don't at least demand the money needed to do your job properly.

    stop being a fucking tightass and pay the price for professional equipment.

    you can't whine about consumer grade shit not doing a professional grade job. takes money to make money and all that...

  111. DVIO Link - thankyou! by Quizo69 · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the link to DVIO, I love tiny little programs like this that do just what they need with no cruft.

    Since I am a budding filmmaker this will be of good use to me when going to HDV.

  112. 12" PowerBook + DV Camcorder + QuickTime Pro by waffffffle · · Score: 1

    QuickTime Pro 7 now includes the ability to record video from a DV source with one click. Very simple and in my experience works well.

  113. horses ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's the whole bit about the solid rocket boosters on the space shuttle being as wide as they are based on the width of 2 roman war horses (roads built to support the width of chariots, carriages built to work on those roads, railroads built to support undercarriages based on carriages, SRB's gotta fit on a train).

    Video is the same way. We've got purely digital video formats. There's no reason whatsoever to record stuff at 29.97 fps aside from that's the way we've been doing it since the analog days. We aren't bound by wall current frequency for timing that stuff anymore.

    There's abosultely no excuse for dropped frames when importing from a deck or camera. The imporing solution could just download a file from a tape drive at whatever speed the hardware could handle it (slow if need be). But instead decks spit out video at speed just because that's they way it's always been done, hardware be damned.

    There's so much stuff out there in video/broadcast that is just plain silly that it has to be done that way because it's being held back by old paradigms. Just like designing a space shuttle with the width of a horses ass being an important factor. Cameras don't have to behave this way. Storage doesn't have to act this way. Edit suites don't have to act this way. TV's/monitors don't have to act this way.

    It's just that the horses ass solution has worked for the people who can spend enough to make it work, so they don't bother. But if enough people had the balls to break with these turd dropping paradigms we'd get cheaper, more efficient, more flexible and more productive workflows than we have today.

    People just have to decide to get out from behind that ass.

  114. My Solution by birdman666 · · Score: 1

    I found myself in a similar situation this past year, as I need to record volleyball matches for our university team which run 90 minutes at the minimum to three hours at times. The only way to change tapes and not miss any action was using one tape per game, but being on the team and trying to manage that at the same time was not feasable. My solution was to take the DV camera, an external hard drive, and my tibook and capture the footage straight into final cut pro over firewire. The only tough part was finding a power outlet to plug my powerstrip into and have a good angle of the match, but it worked out. After the match I'd take it home, convert the DV files to mpeg2in real time using the Capty FastCoder, and then make a DVD using DVD Studio Pro for my coach to watch the next moring before practice. Cut out the cost of tapes (it's a NCAA Division III public university) and the time required to capture the footage.

    --

    Nothing from nowhere I'm no one at all