Re:Wow big suprise US spending billions on defense
on
HAARP Amping It Up
·
· Score: 1
"No, I'm admitting SOME humans embrace bloodlust, but MOST (if not all) are survivalists. In fact, it's genetic through evolution."
Iraq never attacked you. You are simply enjoying the killing or iraqis to feed your bloodlust. Afghanistan chummed the waters for you and gave you a boner, you could not help yourself but to attack iraq too.
The same thing happens to sharks (including the boner part). One you bloody the water they go into a blood fueled feeding frenzy and attack anything near them.
It will be interesting to see what you (war pigs like you) do once your boner has subsided.
Re:More conspiracy theories
on
HAARP Amping It Up
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
I am not blaming the troops. I am blaming George Bush. Just like I blame Saddam Hussein for the massacre of the kurds and Osama Bin Laden for 9/11. George Bush at this stage has killed more civillians and destroyed more civillian infrastructure then both of those people.
I would like to point out that it was the liberals who fought for womens rights, civil rights, clean air, and unions. They are still fighting for more and are still being resisted by the same forces.
I suppose it all depends on whether you look at the glass as being half full or half empty. In this day and age we have the power and the technology to ensure that nobody is starving, that nobody has to die from poverty or war or famine. All it takes is a little money and little will.
Re:More conspiracy theories
on
HAARP Amping It Up
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
" Phosphorus bombs are considered incendiary/marking devices, not chemical weapons."
This is a common republitard tactic. When the facts are clearly against you simply redefine the subject. Clorox is a household chemical so is ammonia, mix them together and you get a dangerous chemical, put it in a shell and lob it at people and it becomes a chemical weapon. In this case the US military lied over and over again saying that they only used it for smoke and marking. Yesterday they admitted that they were lying and that they used it against human targets. That's what makes it a chemical weapon the fact that they used it against human beings.
If it was not they would not have lied to you for months and months, they would not have waited will there was film to admit it.
"Yet another bullshit issue championed by the Marxists on behalf of their Islamic allies."
Sorry to put a wet blanket over your orgasm dude. Just ignore me and go back to stoking yourself while you look at pictures of dead muslims.
Re:Wow big suprise US spending billions on defense
on
HAARP Amping It Up
·
· Score: 1
"War is the same thing."
NO it's not. That's just a stupid childish analogy. Not only is it childish it's also completely irrelevent.
"Sometimes we have to kill those that wish to kill us."
So is it OK if I kill my neighbor because I think he wishes to kill me? Is it OK for me to blow up a building because I think three people in it wish to kill me?
"Islamic facist killing the inocent over and over again in the name of a perversion of Islam the believe? Or, would you rather put them down like the sick dogs they are so as to have them kill anymore."
Are those my only choices? Lucky for me I have a mind and can think of other options.
"You can take humans out of nature, but you cannot take the nature out of humans."
Thank you for admitting that you are a war pig for the sheer bloodlust. How long do your erections last when you hear about dead arabs?
Re:More conspiracy theories
on
HAARP Amping It Up
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
"If you can call white phosphorus a chemical weapon, than so are guns and bombs."
Mmmm. It's a chemical, it's deployed with bombs, it melts the skin off of it's victims. Nope, it could not possibly be a chemical weapon, no way, no sir.
"The reason there was no mention of it is that it was covered several news cycles ago. It turns out it's crap. Who knew?"
Appatenly not you. Because that day it was on the front page of asia.cnn.com. cnn.com didn't have it on their front page while asia.cnn.com did.
"Because we're not goddamned idiots."
Maybe not, but I can sure make a case for the fact that you are ignorant if you don't read the news sites from other nations.
Re:Wow big suprise US spending billions on defense
on
HAARP Amping It Up
·
· Score: 3, Informative
"Besides, we all know that there was no war before the US started pissing everyone off. "
IN the last few decades the US has been involved in more wars then any other country on the planet. The problem we have with George is that he is waging war for profit, fun, and because "god told him to" (his words not mine).
Re:More conspiracy theories
on
HAARP Amping It Up
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
I have set up firefox with the BBC news liveboorkmarks. Yesterday I saw a headline that said the US army finally admitted using phosphorus bombs against human targets (but of course denied killing civillians and denied the fact that these bombs which deployed chemicals were chemical weapons). Just earlier that day US officials in London had denied using these weapons against humans. They were continuing the same lie they had been telling since the attack on fallujia.
I then went over to CNN to see what they had to say and it was nowhere on their web site. It also wasn't on the web sites of ABCnews and needless to say it wasn't on the web site of FoxNews either (Fox news web site is hilarious! they should just replace their banner with Republicans RULEZ!).
Anyway...
Can you really blame people when they don't take the word of the US govt? Can you really blame the people when they don't trust the so-called free press to give them unbiased news?
How can you really be sure exactly what HAARP is being used for?
"You'd think a "professional" security agency would have more sense than that, but aparently not. "
Did you ever see tapeheads? There is a conversation that goes like this...
Chick: What are you thinking about. Guy: I am thinking about what it would be like to lick your thighs. Chick: I thought our relationship was purely professional. Guy: I'll pay!.
That's what professional means in this case. MS pays, they yell.
What an interesting comment. I bet the open source crowd can use this and similar comments as advertisement. I can see the logo now "become an MCSE and make less money!". This could be a very powerful campaign to discourage people from becoming windows sysadmins.
MS having lost with the IT dept of MS has gone above their heads and bought the senators. Now the legislature is trying to pass a law that prohibits the CIO from taking action on IT matters without consent from the legislature. Go read groklaw to get the full details of this obcene turn of events.
"(And no, there wouldn't be concerns with system requirements. Apple would have engineered a targeted version of Mac OS X specifically for this program.)"
And what happens when Apple decides that putting effort into a specially engineered OSX is no longer in the shareholders best interests?
"it is not in the interest of any disease to kill its host. the disease wants your body to replicate it and spread it. a dead body for a disease is a dead end"
That's true for diseases that are not designed by men.
Once again, what's your stake in this conversation? It's a simple question, easy to answer.
Out of the blue you pop up telling me what the other guy meant when he said that I must be greek. That seems odd. I still think you guys are the same person. Maybe you can tell me why the guy hates greeks then.
You never did explain why you hate greeks and how is it that I hate america. I am still waiting to hear what aweful thing the greeks did to you to make you hate them that much.
" Look, man, I'm proud to call myself a liberal (and I live in New York!), but please, please, please shut up."
BBHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Right you are liberal, except that you hate homozexuals, greeks, think that global warming is a conspiracy cooked up by hippies and tree huggers.
Also you are a conservative aren't you? Why are you denying your conservative beliefs? Are you ashamed of them?
Since you are obviously a republitard err I mean conservative and since you have admitted to hating the greeks I thought it was perfectly reasonable to think that your hatred of greeks came from your ignorant perception of greeks as being homosexuals.
The hatred of homosexuals by conservatives is pretty widely known no?
"Erm, "zionist neocon" is basically a made-up column for exaggerated fantasies of delusional America-haters (and Israel-haters, too)."
I don't hate america, I just hate you. Israel is a semi-theocracy which has occupied a nation for decades and condones the use of torture. I certainly would not want to live there and would not wish living under israeli occupation on my worst enemy (not even you!).
Oh and zionist are the strangest zealots I can think of. Crazier then any fundamentalist christian who thinks jesus is coming back next week.
"Do you think the US, Britain, Australia, etc., are getting less democratic because they keep electing people you don't like?"
No I think they are getting less democratic because they are passing laws that make them less democratic.
"At any rate, in real reality it's pretty hard to argue with the democratic nature of these countries, with some of the richest and longest-living democratic natures anywhere,"
While I agree that they have a 'democratic nature" they have been getting less democratic in the last decade.
"But, then, you probably consider the "People's Republic of..." places democratic, since you seem to find the US, Britain and Australia getting less democratic lately."
I keep forgetting about the inability of republicans to preceive any degree of complexity beyond black and white. It's either one or the other huh? There can be no other choices in yoru little world huh?
Why do you hate the greeks so much? Is it because you think they are all faggot buttfuckers? It's not true you know. Greeks do not have a higher rate of homosexuality then other people. You should not let your hatred of homosexuals affect your view of greeks.
I was going to say there is no need to hate homosexuals but I know you can't help it, it just comes with the territory.
The zionist neocons are zealots who are responsible for many horrible things. Oddly enough they also seem to have heavy investments in fossil fuels so I gues they are indeed partially responsible. Zionism itself is a very odd ideology if you ask me. There is something wrong with people who think God cares where you live. I think it takes a special kind of psychosis to believe that the creator of the universe chose a tiny plot of land and told his favorite creatures in the entire universe to live there. I used to think Catholics were weird because they thought a person elected through a political body became infallibe upon being selected but zionism take the cake.
By the way is the world getting more democratic when the US, Britain, Australia are getting less democratic?
Slashdot Mirror
"No, I'm admitting SOME humans embrace bloodlust, but MOST (if not all) are survivalists. In fact, it's genetic through evolution."
Iraq never attacked you. You are simply enjoying the killing or iraqis to feed your bloodlust. Afghanistan chummed the waters for you and gave you a boner, you could not help yourself but to attack iraq too.
The same thing happens to sharks (including the boner part). One you bloody the water they go into a blood fueled feeding frenzy and attack anything near them.
It will be interesting to see what you (war pigs like you) do once your boner has subsided.
I am not blaming the troops. I am blaming George Bush. Just like I blame Saddam Hussein for the massacre of the kurds and Osama Bin Laden for 9/11. George Bush at this stage has killed more civillians and destroyed more civillian infrastructure then both of those people.
I would like to point out that it was the liberals who fought for womens rights, civil rights, clean air, and unions. They are still fighting for more and are still being resisted by the same forces.
I suppose it all depends on whether you look at the glass as being half full or half empty. In this day and age we have the power and the technology to ensure that nobody is starving, that nobody has to die from poverty or war or famine. All it takes is a little money and little will.
" Phosphorus bombs are considered incendiary/marking devices, not chemical weapons."
This is a common republitard tactic. When the facts are clearly against you simply redefine the subject. Clorox is a household chemical so is ammonia, mix them together and you get a dangerous chemical, put it in a shell and lob it at people and it becomes a chemical weapon. In this case the US military lied over and over again saying that they only used it for smoke and marking. Yesterday they admitted that they were lying and that they used it against human targets. That's what makes it a chemical weapon the fact that they used it against human beings.
If it was not they would not have lied to you for months and months, they would not have waited will there was film to admit it.
"Yet another bullshit issue championed by the Marxists on behalf of their Islamic allies."
Sorry to put a wet blanket over your orgasm dude. Just ignore me and go back to stoking yourself while you look at pictures of dead muslims.
"War is the same thing."
NO it's not. That's just a stupid childish analogy. Not only is it childish it's also completely irrelevent.
"Sometimes we have to kill those that wish to kill us."
So is it OK if I kill my neighbor because I think he wishes to kill me? Is it OK for me to blow up a building because I think three people in it wish to kill me?
"Islamic facist killing the inocent over and over again in the name of a perversion of Islam the believe? Or, would you rather put them down like the sick dogs they are so as to have them kill anymore."
Are those my only choices? Lucky for me I have a mind and can think of other options.
"You can take humans out of nature, but you cannot take the nature out of humans."
Thank you for admitting that you are a war pig for the sheer bloodlust. How long do your erections last when you hear about dead arabs?
"If you can call white phosphorus a chemical weapon, than so are guns and bombs."
Mmmm. It's a chemical, it's deployed with bombs, it melts the skin off of it's victims. Nope, it could not possibly be a chemical weapon, no way, no sir.
"The reason there was no mention of it is that it was covered several news cycles ago. It turns out it's crap. Who knew?"
Appatenly not you. Because that day it was on the front page of asia.cnn.com. cnn.com didn't have it on their front page while asia.cnn.com did.
"Because we're not goddamned idiots."
Maybe not, but I can sure make a case for the fact that you are ignorant if you don't read the news sites from other nations.
"Besides, we all know that there was no war before the US started pissing everyone off. "
IN the last few decades the US has been involved in more wars then any other country on the planet. The problem we have with George is that he is waging war for profit, fun, and because "god told him to" (his words not mine).
I have set up firefox with the BBC news liveboorkmarks. Yesterday I saw a headline that said the US army finally admitted using phosphorus bombs against human targets (but of course denied killing civillians and denied the fact that these bombs which deployed chemicals were chemical weapons). Just earlier that day US officials in London had denied using these weapons against humans. They were continuing the same lie they had been telling since the attack on fallujia.
I then went over to CNN to see what they had to say and it was nowhere on their web site. It also wasn't on the web sites of ABCnews and needless to say it wasn't on the web site of FoxNews either (Fox news web site is hilarious! they should just replace their banner with Republicans RULEZ!).
Anyway...
Can you really blame people when they don't take the word of the US govt? Can you really blame the people when they don't trust the so-called free press to give them unbiased news?
How can you really be sure exactly what HAARP is being used for?
"You'd think a "professional" security agency would have more sense than that, but aparently not. "
Did you ever see tapeheads? There is a conversation that goes like this...
Chick: What are you thinking about.
Guy: I am thinking about what it would be like to lick your thighs.
Chick: I thought our relationship was purely professional.
Guy: I'll pay!.
That's what professional means in this case. MS pays, they yell.
What an interesting comment. I bet the open source crowd can use this and similar comments as advertisement. I can see the logo now "become an MCSE and make less money!". This could be a very powerful campaign to discourage people from becoming windows sysadmins.
Unfortunately that's rarely possible. Evil is always easier, it's always cheaper, it's always more fun.
MS having lost with the IT dept of MS has gone above their heads and bought the senators. Now the legislature is trying to pass a law that prohibits the CIO from taking action on IT matters without consent from the legislature. Go read groklaw to get the full details of this obcene turn of events.
America, the best democracy money can buy.
There is no need to worry. No govt would ever create a virus and test in africans. It's outside the realm of possibility.
"(And no, there wouldn't be concerns with system requirements. Apple would have engineered a targeted version of Mac OS X specifically for this program.)"
And what happens when Apple decides that putting effort into a specially engineered OSX is no longer in the shareholders best interests?
mmmm one leads to tooth decay and upset stomach, the other to gainful employment. Sounds like a no brainer to me.
"it is not in the interest of any disease to kill its host. the disease wants your body to replicate it and spread it. a dead body for a disease is a dead end"
That's true for diseases that are not designed by men.
Once again, what's your stake in this conversation? It's a simple question, easy to answer.
Out of the blue you pop up telling me what the other guy meant when he said that I must be greek. That seems odd. I still think you guys are the same person. Maybe you can tell me why the guy hates greeks then.
Oh I just presumed it was another alias. Many people use multiple nyms. So what are you doing sticking you nose into this conversation?
You never did explain why you hate greeks and how is it that I hate america. I am still waiting to hear what aweful thing the greeks did to you to make you hate them that much.
" Look, man, I'm proud to call myself a liberal (and I live in New York!), but please, please, please shut up."
BBHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Right you are liberal, except that you hate homozexuals, greeks, think that global warming is a conspiracy cooked up by hippies and tree huggers.
LOL. That's a good one.
You still haven't explained why you hate greeks so much? What have the greeks ever done to you?
SO why do you hate greeks so much then?
Also you are a conservative aren't you? Why are you denying your conservative beliefs? Are you ashamed of them?
Since you are obviously a republitard err I mean conservative and since you have admitted to hating the greeks I thought it was perfectly reasonable to think that your hatred of greeks came from your ignorant perception of greeks as being homosexuals.
The hatred of homosexuals by conservatives is pretty widely known no?
"Erm, "zionist neocon" is basically a made-up column for exaggerated fantasies of delusional America-haters (and Israel-haters, too)."
I don't hate america, I just hate you. Israel is a semi-theocracy which has occupied a nation for decades and condones the use of torture. I certainly would not want to live there and would not wish living under israeli occupation on my worst enemy (not even you!).
Oh and zionist are the strangest zealots I can think of. Crazier then any fundamentalist christian who thinks jesus is coming back next week.
"Do you think the US, Britain, Australia, etc., are getting less democratic because they keep electing people you don't like?"
No I think they are getting less democratic because they are passing laws that make them less democratic.
"At any rate, in real reality it's pretty hard to argue with the democratic nature of these countries, with some of the richest and longest-living democratic natures anywhere,"
While I agree that they have a 'democratic nature" they have been getting less democratic in the last decade.
"But, then, you probably consider the "People's Republic of..." places democratic, since you seem to find the US, Britain and Australia getting less democratic lately."
I keep forgetting about the inability of republicans to preceive any degree of complexity beyond black and white. It's either one or the other huh? There can be no other choices in yoru little world huh?
Why do you hate the greeks so much? Is it because you think they are all faggot buttfuckers? It's not true you know. Greeks do not have a higher rate of homosexuality then other people. You should not let your hatred of homosexuals affect your view of greeks.
I was going to say there is no need to hate homosexuals but I know you can't help it, it just comes with the territory.
The zionist neocons are zealots who are responsible for many horrible things. Oddly enough they also seem to have heavy investments in fossil fuels so I gues they are indeed partially responsible. Zionism itself is a very odd ideology if you ask me. There is something wrong with people who think God cares where you live. I think it takes a special kind of psychosis to believe that the creator of the universe chose a tiny plot of land and told his favorite creatures in the entire universe to live there. I used to think Catholics were weird because they thought a person elected through a political body became infallibe upon being selected but zionism take the cake.
By the way is the world getting more democratic when the US, Britain, Australia are getting less democratic?