A mission-critical app is costing you money while it isn't working though. When steam doesn't work for a little while, it's just annoying that I have to wait until the server is back up.
It doesn't need to be converted to a non-DRM format, because no-doubt there will be a publically available key which can be used for freely distributable recordings.
Yes, according to my copy of the kernel sources, it's 1024. Now if they plan to use the computer as a FTP server for w4r3z or kiddy porn, they're probably gonna leave the port the same, so that more people get to it.
Ideally we would be able to use the heat created from the global warming and convert it to electricity...hoever AFAIK the only way to convert heat directly to electricity (Peltier) is impractical. If we could convert it to say, light, then it would be possible (with a *LOT* of effort and expense though, and over a long period of time) to get rid of some of the energy and cool the earth down again.
Re:My contrarian view of the GPL license
on
Why I Love The GPL
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
I may reconsider if Linux switches its license to something a little more fair, such as Microsoft's "Shared Source"
You mean the "Shared Source" that doesn't allow you to recompile it, and only allows source code to go to a select few? I know you're a troll, but what you're talking about is BS, and could be done under a BSD license.
Furthermore, after reviewing this GPL our lawyers advised us that any products compiled with GPL'ed tools - such as gcc - would also have to its source code released.
Your lawyers are either incompetent or are trying to fuck you over.
Last time I compiled the kernel I saw an option (which I left off of course) for a kernel level web server. I liked the idea about as much as you seem to like TUX.
Doesn't it occur to anyone with any power to change the design that this is a really, really bad idea? I mean not even one person?
In theory the web browser can be running in a "browser role", which allows network connections while the user doesn't have access to that privilage
I haven't really had a chance to play around with SELinux, but can't you set it so that the web browser ONLY has access to ports 80 and 443? And anything can connect to the X port from localhost?
Slashdot Mirror
Well a temporary outage of a game isn't enough to sue over IMO, and anyway, you probably said it doesn't matter when you agreed to the EULA.
Now if the same happened with my Oracle DB, yes, heads should roll.
I meant modifying BSD code.
In that case, they have taken actual property, risked damaging it, and you were unable to use it to drive to work.
A mission-critical app is costing you money while it isn't working though. When steam doesn't work for a little while, it's just annoying that I have to wait until the server is back up.
I did re-install...luckily I hardlinked my SteamApps folder first ;)
It doesn't need to be converted to a non-DRM format, because no-doubt there will be a publically available key which can be used for freely distributable recordings.
As long as they obey robots.txt, why not?
Am I the only person why though that the Borland tools seemed "different" to standard C++? I haven't used them in years, so I don't remember well...
Well I would have said Gecko/Firefox was the biggest, but I'm judging by userbase, and not bulk/compile time ;)
I'm pretty sure your boot time isn't processor-bound.
Didn't the Alphas have NX? Or was that something else...something did I think.
Yes, according to my copy of the kernel sources, it's 1024. Now if they plan to use the computer as a FTP server for w4r3z or kiddy porn, they're probably gonna leave the port the same, so that more people get to it.
Ideally we would be able to use the heat created from the global warming and convert it to electricity...hoever AFAIK the only way to convert heat directly to electricity (Peltier) is impractical. If we could convert it to say, light, then it would be possible (with a *LOT* of effort and expense though, and over a long period of time) to get rid of some of the energy and cool the earth down again.
I may reconsider if Linux switches its license to something a little more fair, such as Microsoft's "Shared Source"
You mean the "Shared Source" that doesn't allow you to recompile it, and only allows source code to go to a select few? I know you're a troll, but what you're talking about is BS, and could be done under a BSD license.
Furthermore, after reviewing this GPL our lawyers advised us that any products compiled with GPL'ed tools - such as gcc - would also have to its source code released.
Your lawyers are either incompetent or are trying to fuck you over.
I never understood this one. Users can still open all the other ports.
Because by default most programs aren't trying to access the >1024 ports. And SELinux will fix some of these problems.
You can just reinstall Redhat (or whatever) in 30 minutes. Running as non-root only prevents you from deleting the files that don't matter.
You can re-image and just restore from backup, but this takes time, which will cost you money.
Not a problem for me, I just use a perl script to get mine while I'm asleep ;)
Last time I compiled the kernel I saw an option (which I left off of course) for a kernel level web server. I liked the idea about as much as you seem to like TUX.
Doesn't it occur to anyone with any power to change the design that this is a really, really bad idea? I mean not even one person?
In theory the web browser can be running in a "browser role", which allows network connections while the user doesn't have access to that privilage
I haven't really had a chance to play around with SELinux, but can't you set it so that the web browser ONLY has access to ports 80 and 443? And anything can connect to the X port from localhost?
For example, there is no single development environment for Linux as there is for Microsoft,
And what's wih that? vi/gcc/make seems like a fair development environment to me, and on just about every computer running Linux.
They only need to have the tape back to the last time you used the card.
He's not in prison?
Well maybe in relation to porn sales ;)
TIGER
That is a good enough reason to wait, IMHO.
Well you can get naked chicks on the internet for free. Why pay for another cable channel? ;)
Over there I think it's criminal now.