RTFA. The economics make it unprofitable. It has nothing to do with people protesting. Like people have that much influence over corporate lobbyists. Bottom line, plants are expensive to build, which makes passing on the costs to customers too high, and are risky investments.
Trolling much. Read the article. It has nothing to do with environmentalists - yeah they have that much power LMOL - it has to do with profitability and getting the necessary capital to build plants. Investors see it as too risky and the costs over runs make it too expensive to pass on the cost to customers.
Read the article - it's not profitable. Period. Hard to raise capital to build power plants. So unless there is a tax payer bailout of the nuclear industry, market forces will bring about the end.
How fucking stupid are you? It wasn't a tax increase. Payroll taxes were reduced TEMPORARILY by 2%. That reduction was meant to end. Only a jackass would call that a tax increase
Because dipshit the Payroll Tax reduction was a temporary reduction. This funds Social Security. It's not a tax increase. 2% is hardly alot of money. If you make $100k you might bitch more.
Slashdot Mirror
They don't want facts getting in way of their argument....
Next you'll say kids shouldn't be forced to to go to school or eat vegetables...
Because there's health reasons for circumcision which is no more barbaric than plastic surgery, piercings and tattoos...
But you can't prosecute HSBC for breaking the law. What's up with that....
We'll be seeing that strike in ten years...thanks for the advanced warning...
China knows that....allies is a stretch...China would jettison N Korea in a heart beat if they could.
Exactly, I mean slavery was popular in it's day until it became unpopular....*eye roll*
RTFA. The economics make it unprofitable. It has nothing to do with people protesting. Like people have that much influence over corporate lobbyists. Bottom line, plants are expensive to build, which makes passing on the costs to customers too high, and are risky investments.
Trolling much. Read the article. It has nothing to do with environmentalists - yeah they have that much power LMOL - it has to do with profitability and getting the necessary capital to build plants. Investors see it as too risky and the costs over runs make it too expensive to pass on the cost to customers.
Read the article - it's not profitable. Period. Hard to raise capital to build power plants. So unless there is a tax payer bailout of the nuclear industry, market forces will bring about the end.
Do research into gun violence and Doctors can't ask if you own a gun....wow....
" Every bit of carbon in coal deposits came from the atmosphere!!"
LMOL , you really are brain dead.
Because the people that are responding to his post are scientists??? Yeah pull the other one....
Methane anyone....
Somebody doesn't live in reality.
So explain to me how Bush paid for the Iraq War? Oh that's right he didn't.
How fucking stupid are you? It wasn't a tax increase. Payroll taxes were reduced TEMPORARILY by 2%. That reduction was meant to end. Only a jackass would call that a tax increase
Because dipshit the Payroll Tax reduction was a temporary reduction. This funds Social Security. It's not a tax increase. 2% is hardly alot of money. If you make $100k you might bitch more.
THANK YOU! I would say the lack of demand is an indictment on price rather than want.
The article has nothing to do with Apple. The response is called trolling....
They're cheaper because of federal subsidies...
I know like the amount of natural gas in the Marcellus Shale....WAY OVERBLOWN....wait that doesn't help your argument.
According to the NNPT Iran can have civilian nuclear program. But according to the West, they can't. Who's the bully again.....
Yeah I guess advocating for the facts makes you an activist *eye roll*....what was Netanyahu advocating for again....
Like Iraq's weapons programs....