Um people making critical comments on subject matter with which they have no background, yes I'd have a problem regardless of their position. Because they would be talking out of their asses.
And Motorola being an international company operating in German markets under German laws can take Microsoft to court and sue for an injunction. If the United States does not want to respect German law, then the WTO can step in and slap heavy fines on the United States.
No it is for a German court to decided whether or not Motorola's actions are proper. What the United States thinks is irrelevant. The WTO can decide whether or not US and German laws are at odds.
Oracle Previews Java SE 7 for Mac OS X, Unveils Java SE Roadmap
Oracle is releasing a technology preview of Java SE 7 on Mac OS X and said it plans to release Java SE 7 on Mac OS X for developers in the second quarter of 2012 and a consumer version later that year.
"Thirdly, it is abstracted away from machine code, so you cannot understand what your algorithms do in assembly."
You're joking right? Who the hell knows machine code these days. That's the point about higher level languages, you program in near real language not assembly.
"...is the changing role of science in the United States. “In the past, the scientific community was viewed as concerned primarily with macro structural matters such as winning the space race,” Gauchat said. “Today, conservatives perceive the scientific community as more focused on regulatory matters such as stopping industry from producing too much carbon dioxide. Conservatives often oppose government regulation, and they increasingly perceive science as on the side of regulation, especially as scientific evidence is used more frequently in the work of government agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency and in public debates over issues such as climate change.”
The problem is conservatives see Science is more focused on regulations and since conservatives oppose regulations - hello Koch brothers - they oppose science.
It's that simple. When two are aligned towards the same goal, there is no opposition. When it's perceived that science is aligned against them, there is opposition.
The problem is not with a the papers submitted. The problem is with the editorial board not taking time to peer review the articles and simply rubber stamping them for publication. Seems to me these journals wanted to jump on the sensationalism band wagon to get greater publicity.
Slashdot Mirror
Wait they came out with a Second law? Damn and I just got done with the First!
Why not Grover Norquist and 270 members of Congress did.
Not quite: "We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject."
Unfortunately for the 49 pin-heads, the Science support remarks made by NASA.
And no better than plumbers. My apologies to plumbers everywhere. Plumbers are useful to society, Astronauts...not so much...
Um people making critical comments on subject matter with which they have no background, yes I'd have a problem regardless of their position. Because they would be talking out of their asses.
Perhaps they want to revisit the whole Earth is Flat versus Round debate. I think there is new evidence which casts doubt on those rounders.
Or even scientists, "Most are not even scientists in the sense that they have pursued scientific research during their careers, in any discipline."
Ah lobbyists, is there anything they won't say...
And Motorola being an international company operating in German markets under German laws can take Microsoft to court and sue for an injunction. If the United States does not want to respect German law, then the WTO can step in and slap heavy fines on the United States.
No it is for a German court to decided whether or not Motorola's actions are proper. What the United States thinks is irrelevant. The WTO can decide whether or not US and German laws are at odds.
And this
Oracle Previews Java SE 7 for Mac OS X, Unveils Java SE Roadmap
Oracle is releasing a technology preview of Java SE 7 on Mac OS X and said it plans to release Java SE 7 on Mac OS X for developers in the second quarter of 2012 and a consumer version later that year.
http://thejournal.com/articles/2011/10/06/oracle-previews-java-se-7-for-mac-os-x-unveils-java-se-roadmap.aspx
Actually no that's not correct. Apple and Oracle are working together on it:
"In November, Apple and Oracle announced that they would collaborate on a Mac-based incarnation of OpenJDK, an open source version of Java."
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/02/27/no_java_in_mac_os_x_lion/
What!?! Yeah because there are more servers than desktop computers. We're talking about infection on desktop computers.
don't be a douche.
He had an loaded gun on his person. How is that a lie. Moron.
They also outlawed teaching Mexican American studies in public schools, so no I don't find this surprising.
BFD. Business don't want their employees surfing the web for non business related business.
"Thirdly, it is abstracted away from machine code, so you cannot understand what your algorithms do in assembly."
You're joking right? Who the hell knows machine code these days. That's the point about higher level languages, you program in near real language not assembly.
The java icon is not nearly as annoying as Flash.
And that (the enterprise) my dear sir, is where the money is at.
Yeah, it's not like their complaining about plug-ins breaking...oh wait....
You do realize there is a Conservative political party and conservative movement. People use the term conservative to describe an ideology.
Too bad you don't understand that.
That's not what the article says. But thanks for being an idiot who proves the authors point.
As opposed to politicians and Super PACs motives, their interpretations, or their solutions....
Did you read the article?
"...is the changing role of science in the United States. “In the past, the scientific community was viewed as concerned primarily with macro structural matters such as winning the space race,” Gauchat said. “Today, conservatives perceive the scientific community as more focused on regulatory matters such as stopping industry from producing too much carbon dioxide. Conservatives often oppose government regulation, and they increasingly perceive science as on the side of regulation, especially as scientific evidence is used more frequently in the work of government agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency and in public debates over issues such as climate change.”
The problem is conservatives see Science is more focused on regulations and since conservatives oppose regulations - hello Koch brothers - they oppose science.
It's that simple. When two are aligned towards the same goal, there is no opposition. When it's perceived that science is aligned against them, there is opposition.
The problem is not with a the papers submitted. The problem is with the editorial board not taking time to peer review the articles and simply rubber stamping them for publication. Seems to me these journals wanted to jump on the sensationalism band wagon to get greater publicity.
Is corporate America going to stop doing business in/with China? I don't think so...
My wife LOVES the original Doctor Who and not his gay twat hour show that is masquerading as Doctor Who.