No Zippy no one plead guilty to election law violations or working with the Russian government or anything to do with the 2016 election. In fact no one was charged with any election law violations. Period.
Difference is Hillary Clinton had classified information on personal email servers in violation of the Espionage Act.
Server location or distinction between personal vs government is important. One is allowed to have classified email on government servers that are controlled by the government.
Oh poor little corporate shill no none of that happened but if make you sleep better at night knowing that exposing what your government does, i.e., journalism, some how threw an election, feel free to continue in your delusion.
That the author is employed is a testament to his ability to sell bull shit.
That this fluff piece got published is a testament to no one reviews articles before they are published.
If we take a our way back machine, we would learn that security was an after thought to software design. Largely because computers were non-networked, single user (as opposed to multi-user) machines. Then computers started to be multi user machines, more than one person working on the the same machine and then they started talking to each other, i.e., networked.
During this evolution from single user to multi-user and to networked, people started looking at security. How to prevent people in a multi user environment from seeing each others information and how to prevent people from their computers accessing someone else's computer on the same network.
This was all BEFORE 1994 and the WORLD WIDE WEB. The internet existed long before 1994 but when you say "internet" you are referring to the WORLD WIDE WEB.
So no the internet did not change anything. As multi user environments became the norm and networking evolved, security became an issue and a concern.
What you jackasses like Google did was continue the long history of software makers ignoring security concerns. But you did it AFTER people where focusing on security. You did it AFTER lessons learned. You COULD HAVE backed in security into your products and services but CHOSE not to.
"Contrary to Gates’s time line, which he later amended to “several years,” gene-drive technology remains highly experimental. Scientists aren’t sure how well it would work in the wild and don’t even have insects they consider ready for field tests."
Really did he get his iddy biddy feelings hurt? Just fuck off. The computer system was fucking crap. Read the fucking article! The complexity of forms is outstanding. The development company fucked up in a bog way. You don't like it, fuck off. Software companies need to understand the complexity of the task and not promise they can do everything. First fucking thing to do, is STUDY THE CLIENT'S BEHAVIOR! Understand how things are done. Not tell them how to do their job!
Yes the computer system was less efficient because it did not serve the needs of the client. Unless you understand that you will never design a successful system.
You're learning aren't you. One size does not fit all. Stop shoe horning people into a single system and start adapting. Admit what can't be done and do what can.
Slashdot Mirror
Clinton foundation donations. Arms sales to Saudi Arabia. Classified information found on personal computers in violation of the Espionage Act.
To do what flip burgers? It's sad to see people with their head so far up their fucking asses.
Wait meddling in foreign elections is an act of war? They why aren't we already at war with Russia with meddling in THEIR elections in 1996 https://www.theguardian.com/co... https://www.nytimes.com/2018/0...
You know that didn't happen right? Moron.
No ass-hole they are stating that *IF* they did it is protected under the customary international law of foreign sovereign immunity.
They also remind the court that "the US has many times benefited from the same international accords in regards to its military's cyber operations."
So keep pretending the United States does not engage in military's cyber operations.
No Zippy no one plead guilty to election law violations or working with the Russian government or anything to do with the 2016 election. In fact no one was charged with any election law violations. Period.
Moron.
Difference is Hillary Clinton had classified information on personal email servers in violation of the Espionage Act.
Server location or distinction between personal vs government is important. One is allowed to have classified email on government servers that are controlled by the government.
And Hillary Clinton had classified information on her personal computer and Huma Abedin's laptop in violation of the Espionage Act which is a felony.
The only reason Clinton is not indicated and convicted is because Comey prevented that from happening.
FYI Clinton did not have approval from the State Department to use her personal email server. Clinton lied when she said she did.
Keep pretending the two are the same.
Umm no sense it wasn't classified information that is in violation of the Espionage Act.
"Slate argues that Facebook "is a normal sleazy company now,"
Now? Are you aware of Facebook's origins? Seriously Facebook was a sleazy to begin with. NOTHING HAS CHANGED.
The authorities had every opportunity to interview Assange but they chose not too. The admitted facts of the case show he did not rape anyone.
Because of the admitted facts. Try again moron.
Oh poor little corporate shill no none of that happened but if make you sleep better at night knowing that exposing what your government does, i.e., journalism, some how threw an election, feel free to continue in your delusion.
That the author is employed is a testament to his ability to sell bull shit.
That this fluff piece got published is a testament to no one reviews articles before they are published.
If we take a our way back machine, we would learn that security was an after thought to software design. Largely because computers were non-networked, single user (as opposed to multi-user) machines. Then computers started to be multi user machines, more than one person working on the the same machine and then they started talking to each other, i.e., networked.
During this evolution from single user to multi-user and to networked, people started looking at security. How to prevent people in a multi user environment from seeing each others information and how to prevent people from their computers accessing someone else's computer on the same network.
This was all BEFORE 1994 and the WORLD WIDE WEB. The internet existed long before 1994 but when you say "internet" you are referring to the WORLD WIDE WEB.
So no the internet did not change anything. As multi user environments became the norm and networking evolved, security became an issue and a concern.
What you jackasses like Google did was continue the long history of software makers ignoring security concerns. But you did it AFTER people where focusing on security. You did it AFTER lessons learned. You COULD HAVE backed in security into your products and services but CHOSE not to.
So please fuck off.
You mean Jeff Bezos.
That or a RUST salesman.
Think again, FTA:
"Contrary to Gates’s time line, which he later amended to “several years,” gene-drive technology remains highly experimental. Scientists aren’t sure how well it would work in the wild and don’t even have insects they consider ready for field tests."
Unless he's defending Julian Assange and calling out the United States for silencing a journalist, it's all propaganda....
You mean corporate media. And that's in no danger of being throttled.
It's a matter of a poorly designed system, which is quite obvious from reading the article.
Or you can just fuck off. Here lets' take that lovely computer system and shove it up your ass. You have a biggest enough ass-hole to accommodate it.
Systems are suppose to be built for people, not the other way around. Ponder that moron.
Mod Up! Best understanding of the situation.
Really did he get his iddy biddy feelings hurt? Just fuck off. The computer system was fucking crap. Read the fucking article! The complexity of forms is outstanding. The development company fucked up in a bog way. You don't like it, fuck off. Software companies need to understand the complexity of the task and not promise they can do everything. First fucking thing to do, is STUDY THE CLIENT'S BEHAVIOR! Understand how things are done. Not tell them how to do their job!
Yes the computer system was less efficient because it did not serve the needs of the client. Unless you understand that you will never design a successful system.
You're learning aren't you. One size does not fit all. Stop shoe horning people into a single system and start adapting. Admit what can't be done and do what can.