A bad law is a bad thing, and civil disobedience is one way to protest it.
I think "civil disobedience" is a misleading name. Only slaves have to obey.
When a free man does not follow a bad law, he is simply exercising his liberty.
And what happens when one rich, man spends $200,000 and 2 weeks "lobbying" for his issue of the day, using only his private funds and time? Certainly we can't stop private citizens from spending their own time and money to bring their issues to the attention of their lawmakers.
Someone said it before; "Democracy sucks. 51% of people can legally dispossess to the other 49% of their properties, and even of their lives". With lobbies it only sucks more. One man alone (with the help of lawmakers) can dispossess to the rest of the people of their property.
I can't understand why a free man have to obey unjust laws. Only slaves have to obey. If the only reason to obey is the fear of punishment, then what is the difference between a democracy and a dictatorship?
Yes, I am european, and a possible martyr of software patents thanks to lobbies.
It's strange the friends we seem to be making these days... First IBM, now PWC.
IBM owns PWC. So in essence, these two friends are one and the same.
October 2, 2002
"IBM paid about $3.5 billion in cash and stock for the PricewaterhouseCoopers unit, which specializes in global management consulting and technology services".
See full article here
--
How may a "trillion" be a "million million"?
Thank you.
When a free man does not follow a bad law, he is simply exercising his liberty.
I can't understand why a free man have to obey unjust laws. Only slaves have to obey. If the only reason to obey is the fear of punishment, then what is the difference between a democracy and a dictatorship?
Yes, I am european, and a possible martyr of software patents thanks to lobbies.
"IBM paid about $3.5 billion in cash and stock for the PricewaterhouseCoopers unit, which specializes in global management consulting and technology services".
See full article here
So, I will use Usan until Usans invent an appropiate name to refer to themselves.
Note: Usan is not in the Merriam-Webster.
We, the Spaniards are not the only Europeans. You know?
The lack of a collective name for the inhabitants of the USA doesn't give them the right to steal the term "American".
Hey, they even seem to lack a name for "collective name for the inhabitants of somewhere". (Gentilicio in Spanish).
In Soviet Russia, the universe didn't existed at that time. (-2*10E12 years).
I am going to give a try to Joe 3.0 now.