What? Do you even know what fragmentations means? The style guide has everything to do with how apps behave, which has almost nothing to do with the so-called "fragmentation."
If you think JavaScript is a hack, I suspect you know nothing about it. It really is a fantastic language - very very powerful.
FYI - the DOM sucks, but that isn't the language's fault.
You're ignoring the fact that a large percentage of websites are no longer pages, but instead are really javascript driven applications running in a browser. For large web applications, this type of performance improvement is far more important than the bottleneck of downloading the app.
You're misunderstanding his post. His point is that the document as the author created it should look the same to all viewers no matter what their device. The author has full, very specific, control over what the document looks like to the user. Compare this to the web where pages render differently on every device. He's not talking about security or whether or not users can edit the document.
I recall being taught that some catholic bibles have been modified to show baby baptism. I think I recall hearing that they change Jesus' attitude toward his mother as well, but I'm not sure about that. TBH, I don't know a ton about this, I'm just spouting what I have been taught. I could be wrong. I'm sure you can find websites about this stuff if you actually care. I apologize in advance if anything I've said is not true.
Boy, I should've never gotten myself tied up in a religious discussion on slashdot. I think I'm done for now.
Picking and choosing, "this book should be part of the Bible" and "this book should not be part of the Bible" is as arbitrary as they come, and no Christian denomination is better than the other. After all, none of the books currently in any bible was written by the apostles.
I'm not talking about picking and choosing books, I'm talking about rewriting books to add baby-baptism for example.
And afaik, many of the new testament books were written by the apostles. Who taught you otherwise? Peter, James, and John wrote bits, and I'm pretty sure Luke did too.
Before judging people as not being "truly" Christian, you might want to read up on early Christianity. None of the current denominations believe in anything remotely close to what early Christians believed in, so it's kind of tough to make the argument that you have the correct version while other modern denominations do not.
Again, who taught you this? The parts of the bible written by Paul give a decent indication of what early Christians believed and agreed and disagreed about.
Just believe what you want to believe, let others believe what they want to believe. Don't try to tell them they are wrong, and don't let anyone tell you that you are wrong. If your religion is making you happy, that's all that matters.
I've never understood this. I don't have religion to make me happy. Often times, it just makes me upset with myself because I don't live it enough and don't have enough faith. I believe it because I believe it to be true! Pretending you believe something you do not to be happy is a ridiculous idea imo and could never actually make you happy. If I believe I have the truth and you do not, why not share the truth with others?
You have made a fallacious assumption that your interpretation is the only valid one.
IMO, it doesn't make any sense to not believe you are right. Of course I think my interpretation is the right one.
Catholicism was around a lot longer than Protestantism and for that reason has a number of traditions and non-biblical authorities built up along side the "letter of the word".
This is only partially true. Protestants were people who left Catholicism to return to what they believed (and I believe) were the true doctrines. There were other sects that had those same doctrines who never left the Catholic church because they were never part of it. Today, they would typically be called Protestants, even though their beliefs are older than the Catholic teachings. The Catholic Church killed people for "heresy" for their entire early history. Many of those martyrs had similar beliefs to the modern protestants.
While you can point all you want to them having beliefs in addition to the bible, their traditions are just as old, if not older than the bible itself. So, where is your justification to dismiss it?
Though fully compiled later, the entire new testament was almost certainly written before 100AD, before the Catholics. Maybe you don't know this, but Peter didn't know he was a pope. (Hint: He wasn't).
An interesting question, if Jesus had passed through oral history a matter of significant religious significance that affected your salvation, but since this oral history was never codified into the bible... would this make it wrong?
He didn't, therefore it isn't an interesting question. I believe that everything you need to know about Christ is in the bible.
I read the wiki on your fallacy, but I'm not sure exactly what you are getting at. Many of the doctrines officially taught by the Catholic church are not the doctrines of Christ or the apostles. Therefore, these doctrines are by definition not truly Christian. In some cases, Catholic bibles have been altered to hide this.
FWIW, I used to be Catholic, but am now more of a Baptist or perhaps non-denom.
You might want to inform the Pope and the billion or so Catholics of this fact.
It's true, you might. The Catholic church makes me so angry because it gives true Christianity such a bad name. The really sad and interesting part is that a large percentage of Catholics don't realize that the church they've been taught to idolize and love doesn't follow the same faith and doctrines they themselves actually believe.
Who cares? You still paid $80 for a $200 book.
Now, whether or not the book should legitimately cost $200 (or even $80) in the first place is an entirely different question.
No. In my experience, Kubuntu is a pretty poor KDE distro. I think Kubuntu quality and ease of setup is about 2 years behind Ubuntu. Do some research and you will find a ton of complaints about it. If you want GNOME, Ubuntu is pretty great, but if you want KDE, try something else like maybe SUSE.
Doesn't Netflix have the same rights as anyone else to buy new releases? Am I allowed to buy movies and charge other people to borrow them or is that a special right not granted by law but instead licensed by the studios to rental services?
If an exec... refuses to help disarm the situation then he should be arrested and charged.
What should he be charged with? I don't support laws that essentially say "the police can make you do whatever they want if they feel it is in the best interest of society."
Slashdot Mirror
What? Do you even know what fragmentations means? The style guide has everything to do with how apps behave, which has almost nothing to do with the so-called "fragmentation."
What exactly are the "structural problems that cannot be solved" ?
If you think JavaScript is a hack, I suspect you know nothing about it. It really is a fantastic language - very very powerful. FYI - the DOM sucks, but that isn't the language's fault.
You're ignoring the fact that a large percentage of websites are no longer pages, but instead are really javascript driven applications running in a browser. For large web applications, this type of performance improvement is far more important than the bottleneck of downloading the app.
You're misunderstanding his post. His point is that the document as the author created it should look the same to all viewers no matter what their device. The author has full, very specific, control over what the document looks like to the user. Compare this to the web where pages render differently on every device. He's not talking about security or whether or not users can edit the document.
I recall being taught that some catholic bibles have been modified to show baby baptism. I think I recall hearing that they change Jesus' attitude toward his mother as well, but I'm not sure about that. TBH, I don't know a ton about this, I'm just spouting what I have been taught. I could be wrong. I'm sure you can find websites about this stuff if you actually care. I apologize in advance if anything I've said is not true.
Boy, I should've never gotten myself tied up in a religious discussion on slashdot. I think I'm done for now.
Picking and choosing, "this book should be part of the Bible" and "this book should not be part of the Bible" is as arbitrary as they come, and no Christian denomination is better than the other. After all, none of the books currently in any bible was written by the apostles.
I'm not talking about picking and choosing books, I'm talking about rewriting books to add baby-baptism for example. And afaik, many of the new testament books were written by the apostles. Who taught you otherwise? Peter, James, and John wrote bits, and I'm pretty sure Luke did too.
Before judging people as not being "truly" Christian, you might want to read up on early Christianity. None of the current denominations believe in anything remotely close to what early Christians believed in, so it's kind of tough to make the argument that you have the correct version while other modern denominations do not.
Again, who taught you this? The parts of the bible written by Paul give a decent indication of what early Christians believed and agreed and disagreed about.
Just believe what you want to believe, let others believe what they want to believe. Don't try to tell them they are wrong, and don't let anyone tell you that you are wrong. If your religion is making you happy, that's all that matters.
I've never understood this. I don't have religion to make me happy. Often times, it just makes me upset with myself because I don't live it enough and don't have enough faith. I believe it because I believe it to be true! Pretending you believe something you do not to be happy is a ridiculous idea imo and could never actually make you happy. If I believe I have the truth and you do not, why not share the truth with others?
You have made a fallacious assumption that your interpretation is the only valid one.
IMO, it doesn't make any sense to not believe you are right. Of course I think my interpretation is the right one.
Catholicism was around a lot longer than Protestantism and for that reason has a number of traditions and non-biblical authorities built up along side the "letter of the word".
This is only partially true. Protestants were people who left Catholicism to return to what they believed (and I believe) were the true doctrines. There were other sects that had those same doctrines who never left the Catholic church because they were never part of it. Today, they would typically be called Protestants, even though their beliefs are older than the Catholic teachings. The Catholic Church killed people for "heresy" for their entire early history. Many of those martyrs had similar beliefs to the modern protestants.
While you can point all you want to them having beliefs in addition to the bible, their traditions are just as old, if not older than the bible itself. So, where is your justification to dismiss it?
Though fully compiled later, the entire new testament was almost certainly written before 100AD, before the Catholics. Maybe you don't know this, but Peter didn't know he was a pope. (Hint: He wasn't).
An interesting question, if Jesus had passed through oral history a matter of significant religious significance that affected your salvation, but since this oral history was never codified into the bible... would this make it wrong?
He didn't, therefore it isn't an interesting question. I believe that everything you need to know about Christ is in the bible.
I read the wiki on your fallacy, but I'm not sure exactly what you are getting at. Many of the doctrines officially taught by the Catholic church are not the doctrines of Christ or the apostles. Therefore, these doctrines are by definition not truly Christian. In some cases, Catholic bibles have been altered to hide this.
FWIW, I used to be Catholic, but am now more of a Baptist or perhaps non-denom.
You might want to inform the Pope and the billion or so Catholics of this fact.
It's true, you might. The Catholic church makes me so angry because it gives true Christianity such a bad name. The really sad and interesting part is that a large percentage of Catholics don't realize that the church they've been taught to idolize and love doesn't follow the same faith and doctrines they themselves actually believe.
I have 40-50 apps installed. I use about 30 of them on at least a semi-regular basis.
Who cares? You still paid $80 for a $200 book. Now, whether or not the book should legitimately cost $200 (or even $80) in the first place is an entirely different question.
No. In my experience, Kubuntu is a pretty poor KDE distro. I think Kubuntu quality and ease of setup is about 2 years behind Ubuntu. Do some research and you will find a ton of complaints about it. If you want GNOME, Ubuntu is pretty great, but if you want KDE, try something else like maybe SUSE.
Doesn't Netflix have the same rights as anyone else to buy new releases? Am I allowed to buy movies and charge other people to borrow them or is that a special right not granted by law but instead licensed by the studios to rental services?
If an exec ... refuses to help disarm the situation then he should be arrested and charged.
What should he be charged with? I don't support laws that essentially say "the police can make you do whatever they want if they feel it is in the best interest of society."
http://www.random.org/analysis/dilbert.jpg
This is absolutely my exact thoughts on the matter. The question: Is there a real solution?