Slashdot Mirror


User: StripedCow

StripedCow's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,032
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,032

  1. Re:Sure, why not on Cairo 2D Graphics May Become Part of ISO C++ · · Score: 1

    Why can't they just eliminate header files first?
    Why is C/C++ practically the only language that requires headers?
    Why do I need to type each function declaration twice. It is so cumbersome!

  2. Re:Blue Iris on Ask Slashdot: State of the Art In DIY Security Systems? · · Score: 1

    Why do more and more totally unrelated products suddenly come from Google?

    Seems like there is a flaw in capitalism at work here. Perhaps somebody ought to fix it.

  3. Re:X11... on Ask Slashdot: State of the Art In DIY Security Systems? · · Score: 1

    This is /. so shouldn't that be "Run xbill, ..." ?

    Well, if you run xkill, you'd kill the complete program with all the Bills in it with a single click. So, much more efficient.

  4. Re:Really? on Facebook Being Sued Over Mining of Private Messages · · Score: 1

    Actually, facebook's protocols should have been open by now. What if the first telephone company ever (AT&T?) didn't open up their protocols? Would that be acceptable? Answer: No. What if e-mail was a closed protocol run by google? Would that be acceptable? Answer: No.

    So why are facebook's protocols open (a mass communication service like the others)?

  5. Re:User of service on Facebook Being Sued Over Mining of Private Messages · · Score: 1

    Therefore, I demand to pay at least a few cents for a service before using it. (Slashdot being an exception).

  6. Re:Really? on Facebook Being Sued Over Mining of Private Messages · · Score: 1

    Time for steganography then...
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steganography

  7. Re:Really? on Facebook Being Sued Over Mining of Private Messages · · Score: 1

    It's time to have PGP on facebook. I hope somebody creates a decent javascript tool to encrypt/decrypt stuff browser-side.

  8. Re:That's a nice feature for the wearer on Coming Soon: Prescription Lenses For Google Glass · · Score: 1

    Well, you can always opt-out by directing a laser-pen onto the Glass...

  9. Thanks on Google's Comical New Social Networking Patent · · Score: 2

    Google engineers are brilliant!
    They have found the cure against the number 1 killer disease in the US... boredom!

    Thank you, Google, for saving us! As a gift in return, you may have a peek at all our personal affairs.

  10. Re:Use public DNS on How One Man Fought His ISP's Bad Behavior and Won · · Score: 3, Funny

    Google's is very well behaved by the way, so please don't spread FUD.

    Yeah, well we all thought the NSA was well-behaved. Look how that turned out.

  11. Programming analogy on Ask Slashdot: Command Line Interfaces -- What Is Out There? · · Score: 1

    GUIs are walled gardens in that features available in one piece of software is not available to other pieces of software.

    If only Members of Congress were programmers, companies would be modular entities instead of the monolithic monsters they are now.

  12. FTFY on Apple's New Mac Pro Gets High Repairability Score · · Score: 1

    iFixit has posted a teardown of Apple's new trash-can-shaped Mac Pro.

    There, FTFY.

  13. Re:The future is on its way on A Year With Google Glass · · Score: 0

    The difference is that a company with greedy shareholders has its slimey hands on your images.

  14. Scenario on A Year With Google Glass · · Score: 3, Funny

    Imagine you're using your laptop in the subway, some guy wearing Glass sits next to you, peeks at your screen for 1 second, and starts analyzing what you're working on, using his Glass.

    PS: I wonder what Glass would have looked like if a human's ears were not located at approximately the same height as their eyes.

  15. Re:Not the algorithm we need on How Machine Learning Can Transform Online Dating · · Score: 1

    Women, on the other hand, need only a scale with two degrees of freedom:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uN_sSXKbzHk

  16. Re:Not the algorithm we need on How Machine Learning Can Transform Online Dating · · Score: 1

    Huh? Of course if you're heavy you are looking for a slim counterpart. You don't want your offspring to be super-heavy, right?

  17. Re:I believe it on New Study Shows One-Third of Americans Don't Believe In Evolution · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even if you do believe in evolution, it might be more advantageous to believe not in it.
    Why? Well, the brain evolved (no pun intended) with religion. It is rather silly to think you can eliminate such an important part of your psyche without introducing an imbalance of some kind. The brain is too complex, and the unconscious mind is too powerful.

  18. Wait for it on Inside Piston-Powered Nuclear Fusion Company General Fusion · · Score: 1

    Soon to be acquired by... Apple, Google or Facebook?

  19. Re:How about no? on Apple Again Seeks Ban On 20+ Samsung Devices In US · · Score: 1

    But what if Shaeffer was, simultaneously, researching this?

    Assuming they took a systematic approach as well, testing all possible combinations of viscosities and form-factors, they should arrive at more or less the same design.

    Patents are built upon the misconception that what one person invents, another person cannot invent.

  20. Re:AI on Neural Net Learns Breakout By Watching It On Screen, Then Beats Humans · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If it takes an infant two years with the best "computer" in the universe that we know of to learn how to talk, why should we think it will take a machine at even the top-end of the supercomputer scale (which can't have as many "connections" as the average human brain) any less?

    Because neurons are much slower than transistors?

  21. Re:real world databases are usually not pcu bound. on Why Don't Open Source Databases Use GPUs? · · Score: 1

    (I stand corrected then. Thanks for looking it up.)

  22. Re:A tax on advertising, though... on Could an Erasable Internet Kill Google? · · Score: 1

    Wrong. Soon after the tax is installed, consumers will figure out that there is an imbalance in price due to advertising. As a result, price comparison websites will sprout, and will eliminate the advertised products based on the price difference.

  23. Re:Yes, you did on Could an Erasable Internet Kill Google? · · Score: 1

    Think of it as the MPAA-style difference between "home use" and "commercial use".

  24. Re:What's so bad about it... on Could an Erasable Internet Kill Google? · · Score: 1

    Why is this modded down?
    Since when are car analogies not appreciated anymore?

  25. Re:No, it would improve Google searches on Could an Erasable Internet Kill Google? · · Score: 1

    Actually, back in the days that Google started, I never opted-in for any automated service to crawl and cache my site's data.