Slashdot Mirror


User: BarryNorton

BarryNorton's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
925
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 925

  1. Re:No, they don't need free software on Microsoft Thinks Africa Doesn't Need Free Software · · Score: 1
    As for the mass grave - there isn't a power on Earth that could achieve the genocide you so sociopathically wish to inflict on an entire people. Although from your love of mass murder, I'd be guessing that you're German.
    The Germans have never successfully managed a genocide - unlike the North Americans!

    I don't wish death on anyone - I'd much rather you just stuck the treaties you joined us in, and tried to work on peace and prosperity for everyone (not just your flash-in-the-pan rebelious colony of Europeans).

  2. Re:uhm yes on Microsoft Thinks Africa Doesn't Need Free Software · · Score: 1
    Then the problem is *corrupt Africans*, not *the evil West*. For chrissakes, at least try to be somewhat coherent in your ranting.
    No, the problem is why, and by whom, they're corrupted, and to what ends. That is the basis of my (coherent) argument.

    Your government signs up to, and then flouts, international agreements of which its own voting public is so ignorant that nothing will change... without force.

  3. Re:No, they don't need free software on Microsoft Thinks Africa Doesn't Need Free Software · · Score: 1
    "American law [is] the only law that applies to the United States [...] The laws of other nations, or the pathetic whining of jealous foreigners, are of no consequence [...] They could always refuse to [follow International agreements]."
    When, almost inevitably, another nation does refuse to follow international agreements you try to hold them to (especially UN Charters on engagement in war, and holding of nuclear weapons) perhaps you'll be quoted on this - the epitaph on a mass grave.
  4. Re:uhm yes on Microsoft Thinks Africa Doesn't Need Free Software · · Score: 1
    Maybe because [Asian former colonies] learnt to get out of the victim mentality, get off aid and you know, actually develop their infrastructure.
    You're basically contradicting yourself - some of those countries managed to compete against the unfair trading practices of the United States and Europe in markets like textiles, but the produce from farming in Africa (fruit, coffee etc.) is still (as you hint) unfairly and illegally forced out of the global market, and meanwhile oil (gold, diamonds etc.) money from those developed countries is put into the hands of the few, who are then supplied with weapons... Africans aren't inherently corrupt, they're just corruptible, like most us!
  5. Re:No, they don't need free software on Microsoft Thinks Africa Doesn't Need Free Software · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Let's cancel those billions to fight AIDS and nix the big debt forgiveness so we can tend to our problems at home!
    Or you could stop keeping them in poverty by ruining global markets with your illegal subsidies and trading practices - why do you think they needed to borrow in the first place?

    'Billions to combat AIDS'? The biggest way you could help there is not to insist on the ability to enforce patent rights on anti-retroviral drugs.

    Giving a little aid makes you all feel so big, but what you're doing to the third world makes me sick to think you're our (Europeans') cousins...

  6. Re:04/06? Uses? on Flexible Electronic Paper · · Score: 2, Informative
    but we're still far from a viable product
    No we're not - even before this improvement, the eInk technology is sucessfully deployed in the Sony Librie, a damned fine product (whose impact was only held back by initial DRM lock-in under bad terms, and a Japan/Japanese-only roll-out)
  7. Parent is not flamebait... on Office + OpenDocument, Never Say Never · · Score: 1

    The bloody article is flamebait.

    From the Slashdot cookie-cutter: Some blog says Microsoft might plan to support X
    Along with: Google have registered the domain gX.com
    And: AJAX is teh l337
    And: Which is the best programming language?

  8. Re:Worst Hyperlinking Ever on Jack Thompson Rescinds Offer · · Score: 1
    Uh, well they linked that in the last story about this. And, if you didn't read that, then it's the first link in body of the first article.
    I'm not going to chase backwards through links just to try to decide whether I'd have even credited the origin of all this and want to read those articles!

    Again, this is not off-topic: these are poor basic standards - proper hyperlinking costs nothing and saves the reader's time and patience...

  9. Worst Hyperlinking Ever on Jack Thompson Rescinds Offer · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    How about a link to the actual original proposal?

    (Yet again no standards of editing at Slashdot...)

  10. Re:Cyclists too on Gaiman on MP3 Audio Books, Mirrormask · · Score: 1

    Agreed, but I'm also lucky enough to cycle in a city (Milton Keynes, UK) with a cycle system separate from the road traffic - perhaps I should have said so...

  11. Re:Wasted Time on Gaiman on MP3 Audio Books, Mirrormask · · Score: 1
    I'm always one of the first to complain about DRM, but I can tolerate Audible's
    And they let you burn an audio CD anyway...
  12. Cyclists too on Gaiman on MP3 Audio Books, Mirrormask · · Score: 1

    I just wanted to speak up for the more environmentally-conscious commuters too - I listen to audiobooks on the (hour per day) cycling part of my journey into work. What's more, these days find that I most often just continue to listen on the train (the rest of the journey), rather than get a physical book out (which I save for bed)...

  13. Re:AJAX on Google's Rasmussen on Google Maps · · Score: 1
    Does Slashdot get a kickback for promoting this stupid acronym?
    Seriously, the article summarised does not use this term - it's clearly been added either to push it, or to provoke discussion (again)...
  14. AJAX on Google's Rasmussen on Google Maps · · Score: -1, Troll

    Does Slashdot get a kickback for promoting this stupid acronym?

  15. Re:Terrible Summary on 20th Anniversary of Windows · · Score: 1
    So when speaking of graphical user interfaces, Windows only comparision was to the current "leaders" namely Apple and Xerox.
    Agreed, but look at the full term "industry leaders" - this was not an 'industry' back then, but a fledgling market...
  16. Re:Terrible Summary on 20th Anniversary of Windows · · Score: 1
    We used several Mac and Xerox computers in the 80s while 95% of the other computers still used DOS
    Is that supposed to contradict me? It seems to support my argument... (even though 5% is high, if anything!)
  17. Re:Grammar/Spelling nazis on 20th Anniversary of Windows · · Score: 1

    I didn't start out to correct spelling or grammar, merely to give the quote as it's normally elegantly expressed (both the insertion of 'que's and the substitution of 'pareil' detract from the flow of this expression)...

  18. Re:Windows on 20th Anniversary of Windows · · Score: 1

    That was deliberate, of course... ;)

  19. Re:Windows on 20th Anniversary of Windows · · Score: 1
    I think his "too look" should be "to look"
    Oh yes, forgot the best one!
  20. Re:Windows on 20th Anniversary of Windows · · Score: 4, Funny
    Oh, the irony...

    It's 'French', 'damn', you're missing two commas, your comma should be an semi-colon and my quote is correct (not that yours isn't - English is your weakness).

  21. Terrible Summary on 20th Anniversary of Windows · · Score: 1
    "[Windows] was considered nothing more than a slow operating environment that had arrived [...] well behind the industry leaders, Apple and Xerox PARC"
    No, it was considered a slow environment that was no more usable than the other graphical challengers to the actual industry leaders, with their (non-graphical) DOSes. Has the writer of this article summary celebrated his own 20th birthday yet?
  22. Re:Windows on 20th Anniversary of Windows · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose"

  23. Re:AJAX is a retarded term on Open Source AJAX Webmail · · Score: 1
  24. Re:AJAX is a retarded term on Open Source AJAX Webmail · · Score: 1

    Oh, I see (sorry)... still, using the word asynchronous is prone to this kind of ambiguity when you don't even say what it's not synchronous with (the original page requested, I suppose).

    Still, JavaScript is not a necessary part (and ignores the origins in Outlook), and the article doesn't even use XML! Definitely confuses the architecture and (one) implementation...

    How about 'self-updating web content and scripting'?
    Or better still: _S_elf-_U_pdating _C_ontent and _K_iller _S_cripting

  25. Re:AJAX is a retarded term on Open Source AJAX Webmail · · Score: 1
    Asynchronous JavaScript + XML - what would you call it? What am I falling for?
    "Asynchronous" JavaScript seems to be the second thing you've fallen for. OK, so XMLHttpRequest isn't the best name, but Garrett's article was both vacuous and misleading...