Google made many statements on why they have so much space. And it wasn't storage. It was so that users had one email address for practically their whole lifetime, and wouldn't ever have to lose the data from their emails.
This makes me believe they have planned that most users would use only a small part of their email storage at first, and after that, well, storage gets cheaper with time, so by the time people actually use half a gig or a gig, it probably costs 10 times less, according to their plan:).
hehe, but if the ferrari was only slower than the celica gt im sure the celica would cost even more than it does now. and the ferrari wouldnt cost as much. then i would buy a ferrari, woot
1)ferrari
2)insurance
3)???
4)broke
then again if you're talking about system purchase, it wouldn't be a 9.27 percent higher system performance considering the cpu is only a single part of a system. As far as I know the cpu isn't the only part of a computer that contributes to performance.
so you're saying one dog would be owned by potentially thousands of people? and each one of them would be tried for a crime that their dog committed? this seems very confusing and difficult to enforce...
Slashdot Mirror
Google made many statements on why they have so much space. And it wasn't storage. It was so that users had one email address for practically their whole lifetime, and wouldn't ever have to lose the data from their emails. This makes me believe they have planned that most users would use only a small part of their email storage at first, and after that, well, storage gets cheaper with time, so by the time people actually use half a gig or a gig, it probably costs 10 times less, according to their plan :).
bah all this itunes shit... whatever happened to filesharing :)?
I fail to see how the "features" change the legal implications pointed out... the basis of the product is still identical
bah, after i read the article it doesn't seem as interesting to read Ender's Game :[. and i heard it was good too...
hehe, but if the ferrari was only slower than the celica gt im sure the celica would cost even more than it does now. and the ferrari wouldnt cost as much. then i would buy a ferrari, woot 1)ferrari 2)insurance 3)??? 4)broke
then again if you're talking about system purchase, it wouldn't be a 9.27 percent higher system performance considering the cpu is only a single part of a system. As far as I know the cpu isn't the only part of a computer that contributes to performance.
lol you actually think the "gamer kids" pay for their own hardware? you've gotta be kidding me
so you're saying one dog would be owned by potentially thousands of people? and each one of them would be tried for a crime that their dog committed? this seems very confusing and difficult to enforce...
so it's more risky to use BitTorrent to pirate? and all this time I thought it was the holy grail...