a) I'm pretty sure Google does not have any processes designed to extract personal information from movements. If you do have some information indicating they do then please share, otherwise the hypothetical stuff is irrelevant.
b) Why do kids have their own computer? If they dont then their tracking cookie is being shared by everyone else in the house.
Use that argument about any lawsuit, e.g. RIAA ones suing individuals.
"What difference does it make even if these companies are part of the RIAA? How does that affect the merits of their claim?"
If Microsoft catalysed the lawsuits, then it shows that they are pointless lawsuits just to bog Google down and annoy them. The law may or may not find in their favour, but Google gets quite annoyed either way.
Tell that to Darwinia (http://www.introversion.co.uk/darwinia/) and Defcon (http://www.introversion.co.uk/defcon/) (no I didnt know that it was the same company until now).
Extremely fun games, raving reviews, appallingly bad graphics.
No you can do it in software, where some pixels have longer exposures than others.
There is your multiple exposures, however they would not be different as they were taken at the exact same time.
Some N900 software does the same thing but slightly differently, where it does a long exposure, but 'dumps' a short exposure picture from the sensor while its still capturing.
I know I'm old fashioned, but I just find it a hell of a lot easier to use a keyboard. No expensive tech needed. My typing on the N900 is slowly approaching full sized keyboard.:)
Duh. You werent enjoying the show so you noticed. He was enjoying it (logically - he put a little bit of effort in to downloading it) so he didnt notice.
Granted, but the requirement for a runway makes city use tricky.
Also a plane big enough to carry a good quality camera with enough battery power for a decent run would be quite dangerous in suburbia in a crash. These drones however would just drop straight down if there was a problem with minimal chance of hitting anyone.
As opposed to a quarter of a million unarmed civilians (in the first 4 months afterwards)?
RE: The 40k - 150k dead civilians Yes the rest of the world is acutely aware of the US's inability to shoot the enemy. e.g. In the Gulf War, 24% of all US deaths were friendly fire.
Slashdot Mirror
Actually photosynthesis tops out at 25% efficiency.
11% using the sun's spectrum.
It all depends on where you want to measure the efficiency.
a) I'm pretty sure Google does not have any processes designed to extract personal information from movements.
If you do have some information indicating they do then please share, otherwise the hypothetical stuff is irrelevant.
b) Why do kids have their own computer? If they dont then their tracking cookie is being shared by everyone else in the house.
This seems to be great for grabbing headlines, but what exactly does Google track that others dont and how does Google know who is a kid and who isnt?
That, and I assumed that there was lag when manually altering the camera angle, whilst other things moving around are fluid.
And that is why I go for AMD. Identical socket with extremely gradual incompatibilities.
I cannot see having 3 different types of 'Sensitive' can help efficiency at all.
Use that argument about any lawsuit, e.g. RIAA ones suing individuals.
"What difference does it make even if these companies are part of the RIAA? How does that affect the merits of their claim?"
If Microsoft catalysed the lawsuits, then it shows that they are pointless lawsuits just to bog Google down and annoy them.
The law may or may not find in their favour, but Google gets quite annoyed either way.
I'd love to see their stats on what browsers use Bing the most.
I'd bet 95%+ are IE with Bing installed by default and the user hasnt worked out how to change it yet.
I'd also love to know how many searches they get for 'Google' from people trying to get to Google just like how people search for 'Facebook'.
I find 8 quite nice with widescreen monitors.
Might as well use the horizontal space and it does make things clearer slightly than 4.
This is the state saying 'pay us to do something stupid and its all ok' though.
Actually the Americans and Brits find us quite refreshing compared to their own governments. :p
I thought you were on to something....right up until you converted the smart idea to imperial. :p
Although you can't assume with electricity. Too many alternative power sources so Coal becomes irrelevant then.
'Who were the 4 Beatles?' 'Irish'
Oh its nice not living in America. :)
At least you can get 35Mbit symmetric. Here in Oz I'm on 1.5Mbit plus a separate 0.5Mbit connection for VoIP.
How do you know there is anything actually there? His hand could be empty and nothing on his wrist.
Tell that to Darwinia (http://www.introversion.co.uk/darwinia/) and Defcon (http://www.introversion.co.uk/defcon/) (no I didnt know that it was the same company until now).
Extremely fun games, raving reviews, appallingly bad graphics.
No you can do it in software, where some pixels have longer exposures than others.
There is your multiple exposures, however they would not be different as they were taken at the exact same time.
Some N900 software does the same thing but slightly differently, where it does a long exposure, but 'dumps' a short exposure picture from the sensor while its still capturing.
I wouldnt quite say that.
Open source software has made quite a respectable dent everywhere.
I know I'm old fashioned, but I just find it a hell of a lot easier to use a keyboard. :)
No expensive tech needed. My typing on the N900 is slowly approaching full sized keyboard.
Duh. You werent enjoying the show so you noticed.
He was enjoying it (logically - he put a little bit of effort in to downloading it) so he didnt notice.
Did anyone bother reading TFS? :p
Granted, but the requirement for a runway makes city use tricky.
Also a plane big enough to carry a good quality camera with enough battery power for a decent run would be quite dangerous in suburbia in a crash. These drones however would just drop straight down if there was a problem with minimal chance of hitting anyone.
Those microdrones can fly at ridiculous heights.
For all intents and purposes they are a plane. Just slower, more stable and easier to set up and use.
Smile when you do it. They'll have a high res mug shot for the police and your exact GPS location. :)
You should only compare to what is already existing and mainstream, rather than what the theoretically best option is.
If its reliable in general use, and better than existing alternatives, its a winner in my books.
As opposed to a quarter of a million unarmed civilians (in the first 4 months afterwards)?
RE: The 40k - 150k dead civilians
Yes the rest of the world is acutely aware of the US's inability to shoot the enemy.
e.g. In the Gulf War, 24% of all US deaths were friendly fire.