Solyndra's gimmicky curved design was _less_ efficient but slightly less midday peaky. Proof that nobody in DC passed calculus or at least didn't care about details like a companies basic technology.
The Rs and Ds have 'mutually assured destruction' dirt on each other. Have had for decades. Why you saw over the weekend reversals whenever someone like Cheney or Clinton were about to get indicted. It's just about preserving the DNC and RNCs hold on power.
The mainstream Rs hate Trump even more than the Ds do, but have to pretend.
Our hope is that the RNC and DNC both dump their dirt on the other. Then we can get started.
All the 'static' database tools do what you want. All of them. Most will add the simple row ids for you, even when that's not what you want (e.g. link tables in many to many).
You appear to be 'doing it wrong'. Design first, not last. If you find yourself changing the data structure mid project, you surely have many other things to change.
Sure they can have the tool. They just shouldn't expect anybody to come along and fix their messes later.
Choosing to bang your 'wife's best friend' (which is an old English euphemism for your junk BTW. Cite: Python 'Isn't it awfully nice to have a penis...'), of all the women in the world, tells me that you already have 'deeply hurt feelings' and are trying to cause as much pain as possible.
By any metric you care to pull (cost per kmton etc), America's freight rail system is better than Europe's. In no small part because the entire system is optimized for freight.
Defining what is atomic, what are keys, relationships etc is the schema.
I don't know what you want beyond what a dozen RAD tools do for you. Sure Rose builds some ugly code, but it does what you ask. Access does what you ask. DBase3 did what you ask.
The real problem is giving those kinds of tools to people that don't have a clue about database design. Causes problems left and right.
I for one, won't be giving up my car with physical connections between both brake pedal and master cylinder, steering wheel and rack and gas pedal and throttle body. Not until car software is developed to FAA standards. Even then, maybe.
I'm amazed at the number of/.ers that are buying into vapor being an inevitable success.
Consider how your reaction would be different if MS was making the software...that's the correct reaction.
Maybe it's just lurchy lane changers. But when I'm passing a lane full of stopped/slow cars I like to be going no more than 20-30 mph faster than them.
For vehicles on the shoulder, I was trained to _not_ buzz right by them at full speed. Move over or slow down. Doubly so when emergency lights are flashing.
Ignoring your ego jerking...You assert that time to market doesn't matter?
The right answer is both security and time to market matter, ignore either and your pretty much guaranteed to fail. Which is a more difficult discussion than just saying 'you're the problem'.
And of course the rubber hits the road when security breaches happen. Management sees the lack of consequences and manages based on history. Putting a music major in charge of a major corps IT security should reduce the stocks value to zero. That is the bottom line.
Slashdot Mirror
Solyndra's gimmicky curved design was _less_ efficient but slightly less midday peaky. Proof that nobody in DC passed calculus or at least didn't care about details like a companies basic technology.
The Rs and Ds have 'mutually assured destruction' dirt on each other. Have had for decades. Why you saw over the weekend reversals whenever someone like Cheney or Clinton were about to get indicted. It's just about preserving the DNC and RNCs hold on power.
The mainstream Rs hate Trump even more than the Ds do, but have to pretend.
Our hope is that the RNC and DNC both dump their dirt on the other. Then we can get started.
Transport costs average 1%. Try again.
All the 'static' database tools do what you want. All of them. Most will add the simple row ids for you, even when that's not what you want (e.g. link tables in many to many).
You appear to be 'doing it wrong'. Design first, not last. If you find yourself changing the data structure mid project, you surely have many other things to change.
Sure they can have the tool. They just shouldn't expect anybody to come along and fix their messes later.
I don't give a shit if it's electrified. Freight has one job, get shit somewhere for cheap. America's freight system does that better.
Many species of animal pair bond. Humans don't pair bond for life.
Pretending that there is nothing to that or that it's 100% socially constructed is insane, 'assume your desired answer' type thinking.
Even gay men get bitchy and jealous.
Choosing to bang your 'wife's best friend' (which is an old English euphemism for your junk BTW. Cite: Python 'Isn't it awfully nice to have a penis...'), of all the women in the world, tells me that you already have 'deeply hurt feelings' and are trying to cause as much pain as possible.
Her sister on the other hand.
By any metric you care to pull (cost per kmton etc), America's freight rail system is better than Europe's. In no small part because the entire system is optimized for freight.
You underestimate the voltage.
I predict you're wrong. Again, reconsider this steaming pile of vapor in light of it having come from MS.
PhDs in what exactly?
For many fields, a PhD is just a sign that the persons parents and teachers shielded them from the real world for far too long.
If it folded 2 years later, they kept R&D open far too _long_.
Israel lets rich people pay for organs. There have been huge scandals regarding how some of those organs are procured.
Defining what is atomic, what are keys, relationships etc is the schema.
I don't know what you want beyond what a dozen RAD tools do for you. Sure Rose builds some ugly code, but it does what you ask. Access does what you ask. DBase3 did what you ask.
The real problem is giving those kinds of tools to people that don't have a clue about database design. Causes problems left and right.
Bosch IS a mega-corp with many unrelated arms. Some of those arms are world class, some just label and market chinese made junk.
Siemens is, more or less, euro GE. Neither is very innovative, more evolutionary, in technology. Working mostly in mature fields.
What % goes to college now? What % graduates? What were those #s in the 50s-70s?
Moron.
I own a 1960 chrysler with one of the very first curse controls. It pushes up from under the gas pedal. You have to keep your foot on it.
That's a conservative design. WTF happened? Believing your own BS is a trap.
Driver attention system via a high voltage coil in the seat, just under the drivers crotch.
They won't take their eyes off the road twice.
I for one, won't be giving up my car with physical connections between both brake pedal and master cylinder, steering wheel and rack and gas pedal and throttle body. Not until car software is developed to FAA standards. Even then, maybe.
I'm amazed at the number of /.ers that are buying into vapor being an inevitable success.
Consider how your reaction would be different if MS was making the software...that's the correct reaction.
We should also have tougher license standards for people who want to drive cars with slush boxes. 99% of _terrible_ drivers can't drive stick.
Make everybody take their driving test in a stick shift.
And required 'yellow bumpers' until they drive for a year without accident or ticket.
Maybe it's just lurchy lane changers. But when I'm passing a lane full of stopped/slow cars I like to be going no more than 20-30 mph faster than them.
For vehicles on the shoulder, I was trained to _not_ buzz right by them at full speed. Move over or slow down. Doubly so when emergency lights are flashing.
Unless you have no competitors, you can't get away with shipping windows ME in 2017. Even PackardBell eventually went broke.
Ask Kaspersky how 'just shipping' worked out for them.
It's mostly about development tool selection. But it's also developer culture. I do agree there is no SECURE. Certainly no simple secure.
There is also the cost ratio of bugs found in house vs bugs that make it into the wild and the high cost of retrofitting security.
It is about tradeoffs, time to market is very important. But not crapping the bed when you get there is also important.
OP is incoherent. Are the people living in SF slaves ot 'corporate slave masters' or were they 'born to into walth'.
OP is a perfect summary of 'liberal' ethos. Shitbird is 'entitled' to a SF house big enough to raise kids, despite not putting forth any effort.
Ignoring your ego jerking...You assert that time to market doesn't matter?
The right answer is both security and time to market matter, ignore either and your pretty much guaranteed to fail. Which is a more difficult discussion than just saying 'you're the problem'.
And of course the rubber hits the road when security breaches happen. Management sees the lack of consequences and manages based on history. Putting a music major in charge of a major corps IT security should reduce the stocks value to zero. That is the bottom line.