The key numbers are the CO2/Water vapor positive feedback coefficient and the CO2/albedo negative feedback coefficient. Both are pulled from dark places and can make the models tell the modelers anything they want. They are responsible for the range of forecasts and really can't be validated with backcasting.
Since women had the vote, the taller candidate with the better hair always wins. Trump's hair was only slightly better than Hillary's, but clearly he was taller.
It should be recorded that the first thing women did with their votes was pass alcohol prohibition, an epicly, undeniably terrible decision.
It really depends oh how you do the accounting. If China gets to export its emissions along with the (manufactured goods/raw materials/ag products), then so does America.
In any case, there are no statistics to back your claim. IIRC Kuwait has the worst raw #s. Europe has the benefit of having very little chemical industry left. Like I say, it depends on how you crunch the #s.
The (CO2/Water vapor) positive feedback coefficient is pulled from a dark place and can be used to make climate models tell you anything you want them to.
The (CO2/Cloud cover/albedo change) negative feedback coefficient is exactly the same.
Some early climate 'scientists' were so enthusiastic they proposed a positive feedback coefficient so high the first bug's CO2 exhale would have led to Venus on Earth. They defended these models for years, until the laughter made them pretend they had never proposed them in the first place.
Unless Mars turns out to have caves, dig and cover is likely to be the best way to construct radiation shielding.
Even on earth, tunnel boring machines are mostly used where dig and cover is impossible (under cites, through a mountain, under the English channel etc).
Smart humans have lots of potential. But the world is full of endeavours that require a full human effort to master. These people then sometimes make it 'look easy', but it isn't.
Thinking 'I'm good at X, therefore I can set the world of Y on fire' is the definition of arrogance. Sometimes it's true, when the world of Y is fossilized, but when Y is already moving forward rapidly (like tunnel boring technology)? Tunnel boring is not currently a capital deprived industry. Even with electric cars, Musk just put his capital at risk a few years before the majors, didn't really invent anything and the outcome is far from certain.
Musk's real effort on innovation is SpaceX, which is coincidentally what his academic credentials are for.
Exactly. Or course nobody in power can say it outloud or it wouldn't work.
You know it was the plan because it was their goto plan. The people in Bush's admin were the same people that maintained the stalemate between Iran/Iraq.
Also fucks the house of Saud/UAE/Kuwait etc (only downside, if the middle east gets too hot, the oil money will help the Ruskys). We know they are not our allies, but everybody has to pretend they are.
Not only does the bitch not get to appoint the next SC judge. She won't get to appoint Ginsburg's replacement.
We avoid the 'million gun march' for at least a few more decades. Which is good, the outcome of that isn't predictable. The government losing is predictable, but the new one isn't.
He's suffering from Shockley/Chomsky syndrome. A smart person that thinks they are smart about things they have no training, knowledge or ability in.
Comes from having their asses kissed too much (sustained by being surrounded by echo chambers, hence Shockley went away, but Chomsky keeps on blathering).
Slashdot Mirror
Not hard to qualify for. Just takes a little time and a shyster to work the system for you.
SSDI has been growing by 1 million/year since Clinton signed welfare reform. All while the demographics are aging into regular social security.
What difference does that make?
Social security disability leeches are also working cash jobs.
Remember the good old days when marxists didn't call themselves 'center-left liberals'? Neither do I, they've been doing it my entire life.
Roots of current batch constitution ignoring go back to FDR.
Don't lecture about what you don't understand.
The key numbers are the CO2/Water vapor positive feedback coefficient and the CO2/albedo negative feedback coefficient. Both are pulled from dark places and can make the models tell the modelers anything they want. They are responsible for the range of forecasts and really can't be validated with backcasting.
We are also free to note that 'official' historical data getting colder with each subsequent 'adjustment'.
At the time, good catholics believed the pope infallible in all things. Or at least paid lip service publicly.
Since women had the vote, the taller candidate with the better hair always wins. Trump's hair was only slightly better than Hillary's, but clearly he was taller.
It should be recorded that the first thing women did with their votes was pass alcohol prohibition, an epicly, undeniably terrible decision.
They hired a publicist.
Just factually incorrect.
It really depends oh how you do the accounting. If China gets to export its emissions along with the (manufactured goods/raw materials/ag products), then so does America.
In any case, there are no statistics to back your claim. IIRC Kuwait has the worst raw #s. Europe has the benefit of having very little chemical industry left. Like I say, it depends on how you crunch the #s.
That isn't the 'Status Quo'? Where?
The (CO2/Water vapor) positive feedback coefficient is pulled from a dark place and can be used to make climate models tell you anything you want them to.
The (CO2/Cloud cover/albedo change) negative feedback coefficient is exactly the same.
Some early climate 'scientists' were so enthusiastic they proposed a positive feedback coefficient so high the first bug's CO2 exhale would have led to Venus on Earth. They defended these models for years, until the laughter made them pretend they had never proposed them in the first place.
Unless Mars turns out to have caves, dig and cover is likely to be the best way to construct radiation shielding.
Even on earth, tunnel boring machines are mostly used where dig and cover is impossible (under cites, through a mountain, under the English channel etc).
Smart humans have lots of potential. But the world is full of endeavours that require a full human effort to master. These people then sometimes make it 'look easy', but it isn't.
Thinking 'I'm good at X, therefore I can set the world of Y on fire' is the definition of arrogance. Sometimes it's true, when the world of Y is fossilized, but when Y is already moving forward rapidly (like tunnel boring technology)? Tunnel boring is not currently a capital deprived industry. Even with electric cars, Musk just put his capital at risk a few years before the majors, didn't really invent anything and the outcome is far from certain.
Musk's real effort on innovation is SpaceX, which is coincidentally what his academic credentials are for.
We should start by asking for honest political parties and media.
I know, never going to happen.
No. The oceans are big. 'Traffic safety' has been previously used to justify piracy. But piracy it remains.
The solution is to put larger than needed self destruct charges on these ROVs. Then the Chinese won't do it a second time.
They both have records of lying. If you think they are similar records it says more about you than anything.
One is a machiavellian power monger, the other is a narcissist who reinvented in inferior copy of cryptome.
Exactly. Or course nobody in power can say it outloud or it wouldn't work.
You know it was the plan because it was their goto plan. The people in Bush's admin were the same people that maintained the stalemate between Iran/Iraq.
Also fucks the house of Saud/UAE/Kuwait etc (only downside, if the middle east gets too hot, the oil money will help the Ruskys). We know they are not our allies, but everybody has to pretend they are.
By a federal employee? You realize you can't 'discriminate' based on age, gender or sexual orientation?
They translated from English to Cantonese then back?
No nation owns the oceans 'surrounding' them either. Not past the traditional 'range of a cannon' for outright ownership.
Just bullshit. Thanks to nominating an openly corrupt, terrible candidate.
You guys are still processing grief. Don't make any important decisions until you get to 'acceptance'.
The facts of life are conservative.
I've got a trite buzz phrase too.
Not only does the bitch not get to appoint the next SC judge. She won't get to appoint Ginsburg's replacement.
We avoid the 'million gun march' for at least a few more decades. Which is good, the outcome of that isn't predictable. The government losing is predictable, but the new one isn't.
He's suffering from Shockley/Chomsky syndrome. A smart person that thinks they are smart about things they have no training, knowledge or ability in.
Comes from having their asses kissed too much (sustained by being surrounded by echo chambers, hence Shockley went away, but Chomsky keeps on blathering).
You can write Fortran in any language.