Sounds awful. Seriously, one party in charge at all times? Nightmare.
Every time ether party controls executive and both houses in the USA, they pass a massive fuckup that costs them the next election. We all let out a sigh of relief as blessed deadlock returns.
There were nations like you describe. Fascist Italy jumps right to mind. Mussolini's oft quoted line about corporations meaning the exact opposite of what the people quoting them think they mean.
If you liked 'the Dutch East India Company' you should continue with your current position.
The historic truth is that nationally sponsored, companies have been the worst in history. A corporation like you describe ran the Belgian Congo.
Of course eurotrash trust their governments more. They let the government control more of their GDP. It's an easy measure, that cannot be bullshitted, of how much people trust their government.
But he still advocated firing for sexual harassers but not for himself.
You'll claim Lawinski wasn't a victim, and you'd be sort of right. The unquestioned victim is the person that deserved the job Bill got for Monica in the pentagon.
Letting a woman sleep her way to the top has never made her a victim. But it's still the same thing.
Or they can divert to a lower speed limit side street. Just because someone has the legal right to be on a 3 lane 45 mph road during rush hour, doesn't make it smart. There is almost always another way.
To say nothing of the bad choices vis tire pressure many shell heads make. I repeat: there is no way to safely drive a 100+PSI bike in traffic with road debris. They have to spend too much attention avoiding broken glass etc and end up riding erratically.
So you think these loopholes magiced their way into the code?
You think there is no logic to the way that overseas revenue and costs are allocated?
Study the subject, and propose a better system or shut the fuck up. These laws have been hashed out over decades by people much smarter than you and mostly work.
You'r just pissed that government power is checked by the ability of people and business to vote with their feet. Tough shit. That is a _good_ check on government revenue grabs.
That would mean the frogs have to go after local business. They much prefer to extort foreigners. If this happened (the customer lost and tried to sue you), how would they show it was your problem. They are the ones with an out of control government. A government you are not even subject to.
You positions is that an American business, doing business in America is subject to frog laws when they get their first frogish customer? Does that apply to mail order as well?
No, the problem is that the likes of E&J have made making cheep industrial scale wine into a science. It's much better than is was even 20 years ago.
The frog cheap wine makers still do it the old fashioned way, right down to an average 2 flies per bottle in the sediment.
With robotic pickers, wine making isn't labor intensive at all.
The fact is that 200+ years ago the french were the only people who could make really good wine. Now anybody can do it and the french are reduced to babbling about slate bedrock somehow making wine better.
Slashdot Mirror
Same as Sotomayor. Didn't stop her, because Politics.
Scalia had been there long enough to know qualifications have nothing to do with the process. It's all political and Obama's nominees are doomed.
Jack Griffin is flaming leftest who thinks anybody to the right of PolPot is a right winger.
Repeating that story without mentioning that there were NO private corporations in Fascist Italy is a lie.
It Fascist Italy the only corporations that existed where extensions of the government, like the 'Dutch East India Company'.
Private corporations were not legal there. It was truly a leftest's paradise.
Sounds awful. Seriously, one party in charge at all times? Nightmare.
Every time ether party controls executive and both houses in the USA, they pass a massive fuckup that costs them the next election. We all let out a sigh of relief as blessed deadlock returns.
He used 47% because that's the percentage of the population already on the government tit.
Those people are easy for politicians, promise them more free shit and they vote for you.
I'd like to come. But my folks are both in their 80s. Dad is a 3 time cancer survivor.
When I have time to get away, my time is pretty much spoken for.
It's amazing any of them lived before electricity.
They must have immigrated north in the last 100 years.
There were nations like you describe. Fascist Italy jumps right to mind. Mussolini's oft quoted line about corporations meaning the exact opposite of what the people quoting them think they mean.
If you liked 'the Dutch East India Company' you should continue with your current position.
The historic truth is that nationally sponsored, companies have been the worst in history. A corporation like you describe ran the Belgian Congo.
Of course eurotrash trust their governments more. They let the government control more of their GDP. It's an easy measure, that cannot be bullshitted, of how much people trust their government.
Newspeak isn't just weasel words. It's a linguistic argument. If you don't even have words for something, the thought becomes impossible to form.
PC is sort of going there with banned words and thoughts.
If someone is 'dressed like a bag lady', only a real friend will tell them.
Everybody else just laughs privately.
If one of your friends decided that 'dressing like an ancient Egyptian' was the next big thing, you'd tell them they were being an idiot wouldn't you?
Bag lady chic is the same thing. Too many drugs make people think stupid things are clever.
There is nothing bipartisan about the CA senate.
Argument by platitude?
I own a cheep Chinese plinker (SKS) made in 1966.
Do you realize what else happened in 1966? A great Chinese famine. I've worked with Chinese immigrants who's growth was stunted by this famine.
If the classic guns vs butter trade-off, Mao starved people to death to make these rifles. 30 some years later I bought one for $200.
A real concrete example of all that is wrong with planned economies.
You are simply wrong.
"...the right of the people..."
If they had meant 'militia' they would have written it. They clearly knew the word, having used it earlier in the sentence.
The poor don't pay taxes or do any useful work. You are thinking of the middle class, particularly the upper middle class.
But he still advocated firing for sexual harassers but not for himself.
You'll claim Lawinski wasn't a victim, and you'd be sort of right. The unquestioned victim is the person that deserved the job Bill got for Monica in the pentagon.
Letting a woman sleep her way to the top has never made her a victim. But it's still the same thing.
Consolation...damn autocorrect
Brown has always been a liberal arts school and is the 'consultation ivy'. You don't expect much from them. Chico state of the east coast.
Or they can divert to a lower speed limit side street. Just because someone has the legal right to be on a 3 lane 45 mph road during rush hour, doesn't make it smart. There is almost always another way.
To say nothing of the bad choices vis tire pressure many shell heads make. I repeat: there is no way to safely drive a 100+PSI bike in traffic with road debris. They have to spend too much attention avoiding broken glass etc and end up riding erratically.
So you think these loopholes magiced their way into the code?
You think there is no logic to the way that overseas revenue and costs are allocated?
Study the subject, and propose a better system or shut the fuck up. These laws have been hashed out over decades by people much smarter than you and mostly work.
You'r just pissed that government power is checked by the ability of people and business to vote with their feet. Tough shit. That is a _good_ check on government revenue grabs.
That would mean the frogs have to go after local business. They much prefer to extort foreigners. If this happened (the customer lost and tried to sue you), how would they show it was your problem. They are the ones with an out of control government. A government you are not even subject to.
You positions is that an American business, doing business in America is subject to frog laws when they get their first frogish customer? Does that apply to mail order as well?
No, the problem is that the likes of E&J have made making cheep industrial scale wine into a science. It's much better than is was even 20 years ago.
The frog cheap wine makers still do it the old fashioned way, right down to an average 2 flies per bottle in the sediment.
With robotic pickers, wine making isn't labor intensive at all.
The fact is that 200+ years ago the french were the only people who could make really good wine. Now anybody can do it and the french are reduced to babbling about slate bedrock somehow making wine better.