It is just like a bar, everybody goes where the 'hot chicks' go. The population of 'hot chicks' is constantly rotating, as the old ones age out rapidly. Facebook is already the place for kid's parents to go.
What happens when someone owns facebook (or insider), messengers all subs the most embarrassing thing facebook knows about them? People that bought out of the money put options get rich?
Your prognostication is no more logical than mine. You just believe 'past performance is predictive'.
Because it makes the gun grabbers have kittens, making them look even stupider.
There will be blame to go round. But SS was broken from day 1.
FDR set it up broken by design, LBJ was first to raid the trust. Those are the two biggest villains.
If the tax rate was higher, there would just be more IOUs in the trust.
https://inhabitat.com/npr-retr...
There are more.
The only commies left are on western university campuses and caged in a theme park in Poland.
Someone like Patton could fix Berkeley.
Apple had a hissy fit about all the unapproved stories related to Job's cancer.
Similarly with previews of prototype phones that were found in bars.
Nothing unprecedented about apple managing their PR by shutting down (trying anyhow) stories they didn't like.
We deserve this for not allowing General Patton to finish the damn job.
Money is fungible. Foreigners contribute to the candidates 'global charity fund'. Abracadabra, legal influence peddling.
Almost all Saudi exported oil goes to the EU or China. Just based on logistics.
How many times do you have to be wrong on one thread?
They've been economic tiers for 40-50 years now.
Ronald Reagan did more for world peace than any other 20th century president.
Why would we save a cell phone store?
It's not like RS sold parts anytime in the 21st century.
FDR. His kited checks still haven't landed.
After SS breaks the budget, there will be no debate.
I don't think 'unprecedented' means what the sub thinks it means.
Live by network effects, die by them.
It is just like a bar, everybody goes where the 'hot chicks' go. The population of 'hot chicks' is constantly rotating, as the old ones age out rapidly. Facebook is already the place for kid's parents to go.
What happens when someone owns facebook (or insider), messengers all subs the most embarrassing thing facebook knows about them? People that bought out of the money put options get rich?
Your prognostication is no more logical than mine. You just believe 'past performance is predictive'.
What other 'huge advantages' are you aware of that just disappear, virtually overnight?
MySpace was dominant not that long ago. Its 'death' looked a lot like the rug being pulled from under them. They thought like you do.
They are in the 'fashion industry'. Like every business that is basically about getting laid (e.g. Bars).
If you NEED your next paycheck, you're a wage slave.
If you NEED your next paycheck, you're also a moron who can't manage money. Almost certainly have a $100/month cable TV bill.
Lifetime wage slaves exist as a warning to the young. Don't make the decisions they made.
They just haven't pissed off the hot chicks yet.
Social networks are like 'meat market' bars. Every hot chick hangs at one, until, for no apparent reason, they hang at another.
Corporate personhood goes back to common law. Citizens united simply says that corporate persons have free speech rights.
Two-thirds of the paid English language digital music marketplace. Perhaps 10% of the total one.
MySpace will never be defeated?
Facebook is one really bad blunder away from being irrelevant. If all the hot chicks go elsewhere, so will everyone else.
I doubt the next one will be any better.
They have 'doctorates' hence they are qualified to 'doctor data'.
Looked, can't find my source, which had weird mixed units 145 km and 500 ft per degree C (my recollection).
Looked it up less than a month ago?
Gotta say that graph is very suspicious. Is the average temp at the poles -1 degree C? Also source: 'own work'?
This: https://www.physics.byu.edu/fa... puts the 90 degree range at 35+ degrees vs your sources 30.
Either way, looks like I was wrong.
Pretty sure Chuck was repeating an OLD pilot line.
They would have had to build an F-111 or B-58 style ejection pod with ablative heat shielding. Which would have weighed too much.
That said. I understand the seven crew was basically for propaganda. They never needed that many crew, for any mission.
A crew of 4 or 5 in a survivable pod would have been a near complete redesign.
The actual distance (global average) is 145 km towards the pole or 150m altitude per degree C.