Slashdot Mirror


Justice Department Charges Russian Woman With Interference in Midterm Elections (washingtonpost.com)

The Justice Department on Friday charged a Russian woman for her role in a conspiracy to interfere with the 2018 U.S. election, marking the first criminal case prosecutors have brought against a foreign national for interfering in the upcoming midterms. From a report: Elena Khusyaynova, 44, was charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States. Prosecutors said she managed the finances of "Project Lakhta," a foreign influence operation they said was designed "to sow discord in the U.S. political system" by pushing arguments and misinformation online about a whole host of divisive political issues, including immigration, the Confederate flag, gun control, and the NFL national anthem protests. The charges against Khusyaynova came just as the Office of the Director of National Intelligence warned that it was concerned about "ongoing campaigns" by Russia, China and Iran to interfere with the upcoming Midterm elections and even the 2020 race -- an ominous warning that comes just weeks before voters head to the polls.

261 comments

  1. Who honestly thinks this does anything? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    To me, it seems like adding argumentative content to the internet is about like pissing into the ocean.

    There is no way I can possibly see how this content could be changing people's minds on iota, there is already plenty of REAL argumentation happening online 24/7. They are trying to sow discord in a field where the discord plants are already ten feet high if they are an inch - and it wasn't Russians that provided the copious fertilizer required.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Who honestly thinks this does anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Washington Post is a DNC mouthpiece. They still won't look in the mirror.

    2. Re:Who honestly thinks this does anything? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's like pissing in to an ocean of piss.

      But I think it has shown that memes do affect people. Maybe the people spreading the memes already made up their minds, but maybe not.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    3. Re:Who honestly thinks this does anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wishful thinking, or maybe wishful ignorance. Anyone paying attention to the last presidential election knows just how effective these methods can be. Ignoring the problem is part of the problem. The sad reality is that most people online don't have the proper tools to tell fact from fiction and are easily exploitable.

    4. Re:Who honestly thinks this does anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony and lack of self-awareness with this post is incredible.

    5. Re:Who honestly thinks this does anything? by senileoldfart · · Score: 1

      But we need to protect the U.S. fertilizer industry from foreign interlopers.

    6. Re:Who honestly thinks this does anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My non-US perspective and culture induced opinion is that the interfering parties can only shoot their own feet. An unpredictable US is a lousy business partner, a bad client and a threat to national security and global economy in case of a conflict or political capitalism trumping economic realities of the interconnected world. We don't need another political PTSD nuclear power in this world.

    7. Re:Who honestly thinks this does anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, SuperKendall and ArchangelMichael are perfect examples of useful idiots for the Russians who have allowed themselves to be compromised by the agitprop agents kissing up to their outdated notions of reality

    8. Re:Who honestly thinks this does anything? by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

      Those accusations are not falsifiable. Pretty much everyone can get accused. As long as they can be called "Russian". I'm lucky that I'm not in US. Because I wouldn't survive in the coming night of long knives. I happen to be a Russian, and I'm a "hacker", at least according to one of definitions.

    9. Re: Who honestly thinks this does anything? by bigpat · · Score: 1

      Organized targeted campaigns backed by financial resources are going to be tangibly effective at influencing people. And I would observe that the Internet influence landscape is really not all that vaste and insurmountable as you are suggesting.

      There are some obvious actors, such as the two opposition sides pretending to be the other side in order to make them look bad which are somewhat effective at being divisive.

      But the foreign interference has the hallmark of pretending to be both sides fighting in order to spur people on both sides to fight not just to harness or supress fundraising or voting, but to undermine American society more broadly. Quite a bit more insideous than Americans simply messing with one another.

      Yes we are doing quite a bit of that divide and conquer thing for partisan political reasons, but in the

    10. Re: Who honestly thinks this does anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just can't understand bad orange man being bad, because he is a bad orange man, am I right, fellow persons?

    11. Re: Who honestly thinks this does anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That organized financing didn't tangibly help Billary against THEDONALD. He ate her Soros-packed lunch and bitched-slapped her Trotsky-slut supporters. Gonna hurt even more this November election when gaffot Demo-slut progs get fucked-in-azzwhole.

    12. Re:Who honestly thinks this does anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are Americans so gay?
        -Thanks, Canada

    13. Re:Who honestly thinks this does anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are dramatically underestimating the magnitude of the Russian operation. The amount of US political content they put out is at a volume similar to or greater than the content spontaneously generated by the entire US population. The *majority* of Donald Trump's Twitter followers are Russian-managed bot accounts. They overwhelm the ocean with piss! Read about this stuff sometime, it's fucking fascinating if you have the intellectual curiosity to actually learn about it.

    14. Re:Who honestly thinks this does anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It just replaces one liners from the old media with one liners from the new media.

    15. Re:Who honestly thinks this does anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, all this Russian deception certainly managed to convince a lot of poor bastards that Star Wars: The Last Jedi was actually worth watching.

    16. Re:Who honestly thinks this does anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a time when we weren't as divided. Also, you do realize a lot of our divisions are not really there? We are just following the place the propaganda keeps leading us.

    17. Re:Who honestly thinks this does anything? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we know how effective it can be. Clinton was around the margin of error against Trump before anything major that could be considered Russian interference, and the final elections were within the margin of error. If these methods are effective, they are only effective when the rest of the system is already shitting the bed.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    18. Re:Who honestly thinks this does anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this wasn't coming from you, the guy who lived, breathed, and believed every word that came out of Jobs' mouth including "You're holding it wrong" then you may have had a talking point.

      As it stands, you don't, because you're the living embodiment of the generic fool who swallows down even the most obvious bullshit that is peddled to him.

      You've repeatedly over the years said and backed points that are stupid or wrong PRECISELY because you're a sucker for propaganda, so the irony of you effectively asking "who would fall for propaganda" is hilariously high.

      You might as well similarly ask how Google exists, given that it's almost entire £750bn market cap is based off exactly selling ads. Well the answer is simple - they're effective and work.

    19. Re:Who honestly thinks this does anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you don't actually have to be a troll, you could also be willfully ignorant. (There are a bunch of other alternatives, but those two are the ones that you wouldn't shoot on sight.)
      No-one who has kept up with what the Republicans are doing while in charge could possibly support them in good faith.

    20. Re:Who honestly thinks this does anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If these methods are effective, they are only effective when the rest of the system is already shitting the bed.

      What is your reasoning here exactly?

      Why would they waste resources to make sure Trump won with a huge margin? You put in the effort needed to achieve your goals but not more.
      We don't actually know how much they could have changed the election.
      What we do know is that they have put a lot of effort behind it. It wasn't just a small one election thing, it took them decades to get this far.
      There was a lot of sketchy things and voter suppression going on when Bush got elected too.

  2. They left out the charge of by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    posting a fake profile on hotrussianchicksforyou.ru /s

    One person charged? Talk about the tip of a iceberg.

  3. Russia is using our uneducated racists against us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Aside from cultivating Donald Trump to launder Russian money and repeatedly betray his country, Russia's use of uneducated racists to accomplish their political goals is their most brilliant scheme.

    Just look at how eager uneducated racists are to betray America to help Moscow Donald. At this point Republicans are now polling as supportive of Russia's continuing attack on America.

    We need to "Lock Him Up!" with all of his treasonous co-conspirators with his campaign manager Paul Manafort who is already in prison.

  4. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will those ridiculously bitter and divisive political AC posts stop now?

  5. Re:If I had to choose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More's the pity YOU can't be educated, Ken Doll.

  6. Re:If I had to choose... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0

    It was the "two-for" special in the GP post. Both Racist and Russian Dismissal. The only problem is, he didn't go for the trifecta. Therefore he failed in his mission. But here, I'll help him, by simply assuming his gender. ;)

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  7. Of course you choose Russia and Racists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the point! Republicans betray their country and their supposed values to support their racist and evil ideology.

    Throw in your thing veneer of claiming that people who notice your party's horrible racism and you've got a typical republican piece of shit right there...

    1. Re: Of course you choose Russia and Racists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember the Democrats were the party of slavery. The Democrats were the party of the KKK
      . The Democrats were the ones supporting white nationalism pretty much all of the 20th and into the 21st century. The Republicans fought a civil war to free the slaves. The Republicans voted overwhelmingly for the civil rights acts in the 60's. Your facts are completely wrong. Look at the roots of the Democratic party and you 'all find nothing but bigotry, hatred and racism for over 150 years.
       

    2. Re: Of course you choose Russia and Racists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 2018 Republicans are the party of the KKK.

      * David Duke - a strong supporter of the KKK is a republican. Moscow Donald supports this racist and his campaign of bigotry, and the KKK supports Donald 'pee-stain' Trump.
      * That is why Republican "Judges" overturned the voting rights act.
      * Republicans let the violence against women act expire.
      * Republicans support Moscow Donald's treasonous behavior because they so strongly support his racist behavior.

      Republicans are treasonous, racist scum.

    3. Re: Of course you choose Russia and Racists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Donald Trump rebuked Davide Duke. As well as the entire Republican party. There is no KKK movement in the Republican party.
      https://www.cnn.com/2016/07/24/politics/donald-trump-david-duke-louisiana-senate/index.html.
      Bill and Hillary Clinton supported members of the the KKK even in this century (they were admirers and supporters of Robert Byrd a high ranking Democratic KKK member). Watch the Bill Clinton video admiring him for being in the Klan. The party of the Democrats still has members that are racist even today.

      *The Supreme court overturned a provision in the voting rights act and deemed it unconstitutiona (Not the entire act)l. You are appointed not elected so you don't run on a party platform. With that logic you would be against Obamacare because a Republican judge affirmed it? Besides the voting rights act was becoming an ancient relic that had no bearing on the modern day.

      *The violence against Women act did not expire it was extended 3 month. More false news.

      *Republicans support their President as I do because no Treason has been committed. You will need to cite proof of any Treasonous acts or something justifying why he is a racist? I have heard of neither or seen any while he has been in office. You'd better have some extraordinary evidence to back those statements up. We don't get to burn people at the stake because of mere allegations. The independent council has been at it for over 2 years and nothing so far.

    4. Re: Of course you choose Russia and Racists by desdinova+216 · · Score: 1

      at some point in the 1960s the parties flipped in regard to race issues. The most visible point was in 1968 with Nixon's "southern strategy"

    5. Re: Of course you choose Russia and Racists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "I’ll Have Those N*****s Voting Democratic for 200 Years" --LBJ, Democrat
      A good discussion on the finer points and definitive quotes in the same character can be found here.

      The welfare state has replaced black fathers in the home. Democrats before the switch caused that to happen. Since the switch Democrats have doubled-down several times over, leading to the single-parent household rate increasing from 12% to 70%.

      Forcing black Americans to vote straight-ticket blue or see their family home fall apart is bad enough, but it worked so well they are doing it again to Hispanic peoples. They are told that if they don't vote Dem maybe some of their family members will be deported, damn those evil Republicans following the laws which we also voted for. Know what minority this trend didn't work on? Asian Americans, the most well-off and well-educated major ethnic group in the US. Why? They start and own small businesses, value independence and making their own way with education and family values. Guess which party those small business owners vote for.

      It's the Democrats complaining about systematic racism. They should know, they built that system and are trying to expand it.

    6. Re: Of course you choose Russia and Racists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not true as rascism declined in the south
      The republican party in the south grew. This is a direct correlation. True fact look up the statistics. If what you say was true then rascim would have increased or stayed the same. As southerners embraced Republican policies economic freedoms and prosperity increased. This is juxtaposed to the Democratic run cities where blacks live and still live in squalor. Just like the slave plantations of the past.

    7. Re: Of course you choose Russia and Racists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should rephrase as the Republican party grew in the south racism started declining.

    8. Re: Of course you choose Russia and Racists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also everytime you here the word N I g g e r. Its mostly likely coming from a black person that votes Democrat.

  8. On repeating (NP)CNN statemnts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is an interesting precident. It means that all western NGOs and persons which act to "mislead" any foreign state electorate could be given the same treatment.
    Americans messing around with foreign elections all the time.
    Also if "being wrong" became illegal in the US, you guys are done.
    Happy foot-shooting guys!

  9. 4Chan by Zorro · · Score: 1

    So when are they going after the rest of 4Chan?

    1. Re:4Chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't that foolish.

    2. Re:4Chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The law is on our side kike.

  10. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by AlwinBarni · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Clearly there's a 1st Amendment issue here, but only fascists want free speech now, right?

    An interesting issue, however from the article she was charged not for her speech but for managing money of an organization, which intent was to meddle with US elections.

  11. The NYTimes does the same thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every story from there is about race, guns or abortion. Are they being "divisive"?

    1. Re:The NYTimes does the same thing by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      Yes, and why isn't it being suggested that the fact you have 'ads' for both sides it's a strong indication 'the Russians', 'Iranians' or whatever are simply foreign businesses offering their services to Americans who want to influence the elections.

  12. Sad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fake news!

  13. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Bert64 · · Score: 0, Insightful

    There are many organizations which manage money intended to influence political processes, most large companies spend a lot of money trying to manipulate the political process. This isn't really any different.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  14. So when is the execution? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    What, too early?

    Just use mail-in paper ballots like real states do, and register everyone everyday whenever they apply for any license of any type at a county or state office.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:So when is the execution? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Just use mail-in paper ballots like real states do, and register everyone everyday whenever they apply for any license of any type at a county or state office.

      Yeah! That'll solve the problem of Russian misinformation trying to sway the voters, it sure will! I don't know how, but if WillAffleckUW says it will, then it must be true.

      Oh, wait, I missed the patent insult about "real states" using mail-in ballots. I know of a few that throw ballots out to the four winds so anyone can get their hands on one, but I also know a lot of states -- real states -- do not.

    2. Re:So when is the execution? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Oh, wait, I missed the patent insult about "real states" using mail-in ballots. I know of a few that throw ballots out to the four winds so anyone can get their hands on one, but I also know a lot of states -- real states -- do not.

      Our state has nine winds. I feel sorry for yours, with only four. It must be flat where you live.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:So when is the execution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'll solve the problem of Russian misinformation trying to sway the voters...

      You know, I prefer American misinformation as much as the next guy, but the choice to be "swayed" one way or another is entirely personal. In other words, the voters are getting what they want, but like always, they can't help but to blame others when something doesn't go their way.

    4. Re:So when is the execution? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry I confused you by using a standard colloquialism that most, if not all, native English speakers would understand. It leaves unanswered the main issue with your original comment, in that using mail-in ballots will do absolutely nothing to deal with external influences on the voters. In fact, it will allow more influences on them, like spouses, employers, random people who find the discarded ballots, etc.

    5. Re:So when is the execution? by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Yeah! That'll solve the problem of Russian misinformation trying to sway the voters, it sure will! I don't know how, but if WillAffleckUW says it will, then it must be true.

      So, what you're saying is that Russian misinformation is bad. Really bad. Prison time bad.

      But American misinformation is perfectly fine?

      Oddly enough, the First Amendment (you remember that one - Freedom of Speech, the Press, that sort of thing?) says absolutely nothing about "for American Citizens Only".

      Nor does it mention that the only speech that was protected was The Truth! Note that if it did, then you'd have whomever won any particular election punishing the other fellows (Dems, Reps, whichever) for "not speaking The Truth" (note the caps on The Truth) to the voters.

      On the plus side, The Truth would change everytime the Presidency changed, and possibly every time the House and/or Senate changed. Wouldn't it be FUN to live in a country where The Truth changes in arbitrary ways every other year or so?

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    6. Re:So when is the execution? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      You know, I prefer American misinformation as much as the next guy, but the choice to be "swayed" one way or another is entirely personal.

      I know that, and you know that. But apparently a lot of people do not. It would appear that posting misinformation about political things is an attempt to defraud the United States. (That usage refers to the government of the US, not "everyone in the US".)

      I was pointing out that the proposed solution -- which if accepted at face value would make the majority of those political subdivisions within the US that think they are states actually not be states after all -- doesn't solve the problem it is being proposed to solve. It was just an attempt at using a completely irrelevant problem as an argument for a broken voting system. It's kinda like "hey, a UAV in Arizona ran down a pedestrian -- we ought to have by-mail voting like real states do."

      Whether the problem is self-inflicted by voters on themselves is a different matter.

    7. Re:So when is the execution? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is that Russian misinformation is bad. Really bad. Prison time bad.

      No, I was actually saying that by-mail voting has nothing to do with any alleged Russian influence over voters by using carefully crafted sarcasm. The part about if WillAffleckUW says it, it must be true, should have been a giveaway. Sorry.

      Your entire rant about the First Amendment and stuff was wasted. And it was so pretty.

    8. Re:So when is the execution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It shouldn't have to, you ijjiot. It is a government rule, therefore applies to only where the laws applies, i.e. to the American people on American lands.
      Otherwise, all laws would apply everywhere!

    9. Re: So when is the execution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The constitution only applies to citizens. You know its like a pact or a club. If you're not in the club you don't get to make the rules.

    10. Re:So when is the execution? by dbreeze · · Score: 1

      Russian misinformation is not an issue. The day our own government is unable to inform it's own citizens more effectively than a foreign state is the day we deserve invasion and likely need it.

      --
      When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
    11. Re:So when is the execution? by dbreeze · · Score: 1

      ^^^mod parent up please^^^

      It grieves me to see how many fail to understand the basic notions of our Republic. The undesired critic, unwanted observer, and contrary opinion is precisely the voice the Founders knew must be protected.

      --
      When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
    12. Re:So when is the execution? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      The day our own government is unable to inform it's own citizens more effectively than a foreign state is the day we deserve invasion and likely need it.

      This is a very scary statement. It implies a mandatory data channel under the sole control of the government to every citizen. Otherwise, the "foreign state" will just use the same data channel to speak, and the citizen will be left trying to judge the truth -- just like now.

    13. Re:So when is the execution? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      It is a government rule, therefore applies to only where the laws applies, i.e. to the American people on American lands.

      If you look up the laws regarding monetary contributions to US candidates, you will find that it applies to any foreign national who attempts to donate money or provide services as contributions to a US Presidential candidate. That's why there's all the broohaahaa about them damn Ruskies allegedly giving money to Trump's campaign. It's illegal for them if they do it; it's only illegal for Trump if his campaign solicited the contributions. I.e., them damn Ruskies can't scuttle the next Presidential campaign simply by sending the campaign money he didn't know about. Just like nobody could prove Gore knew about the real source of the money from the Buddhist monks.

    14. Re:So when is the execution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! That'll solve the problem of Russian misinformation trying to sway the voters

      No but it will solve part of the problem with Georgia throwing away unwanted votes.
      It won't solve them purging 10% of their population for the voter registry.
      I fear violence might be needed to fix that problem.

    15. Re: So when is the execution? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Where does it state that the constitution only applies to citizens?

      I'm in the US later this year, you'd better fucking believe I will be relying on constitutional protections.

      If they don't apply then neither do the obligations. You really want it to be legal for me to enslave Americans because I'm not bound by the constitution?

  15. Re: Russia is using our uneducated racists against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    the most recent example is of the lady in St Louis who tried to prevent an unknown tailgater who tried to pass through a secure apartment entry - if not recognized, he should have let the door close, then buzz himself in - while she did what she was supposed to in order to protect her neighbors, the guy used it as a racial issue; the media outlets loved the race angle on this story but in my opinion didn't stop to ask if she blocks other tailgaters of other colors - she lost her job in this rush to judgement that is currently entertaining the masses

  16. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    triggered

  17. Re:Why don't we charge illegal voters with electio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give the ID out for free to every single citizen at birth and by massive mailing otherwise, and then you might have a system that would allow for enfranchisement of voters and prevention of voter fraud.

  18. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    How's the weather is Moscow today, tovarisch?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  19. Re: Russia is using our uneducated racists against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck off ivan your divisive distraction bullshit is obvious

  20. Re:Russia is using our uneducated racists against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're like the walking definition of that NPC Meme. Sad!

  21. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by aicrules · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm sorry but I agree with this being a concern of free speech. There are many organizations (Political Action Councils?) that do just this. When was the last time you saw a mud slinging commercial about a candidate and how horrible they are for doing X Y or Z. Or how Prop ABC is wrong for your state because it will destroy everything you hold dear? Not that I like any of that content, but I will die defending the right of people to push it.

  22. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Free speech, so long as your not taking a knee for our national anthem, or burning a flag, eh?

    Seriously, take your fake outrage and shove it up your orange, shit-gibbon supporting asshole.

  23. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    trololo

  24. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    managing money of an organization, which intent was to meddle with US elections

    AIPAC?

  25. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by butchersong · · Score: 1

    This seems very strange to me. Foreign powers have been "meddling" in US elections for forever. We do it as well. The Saudis for example tend to make significant donations to advocate for the candidates they want... Trolling is not a crime is it? Also the supreme court has ruled the money is speech so should as well be protected -though I am not one to think the constitution applies to non-citizens.

  26. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by ole_timer · · Score: 5, Informative

    she failed to register with the DOJ as a foreign agent. she used foreign money to try and influence an election. those are both against federal law.

    --
    nothing to see here - move along
  27. Re:George Soros anybody???? by butchersong · · Score: 0

    Lacking mod points I'll just post. This ^

  28. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by ole_timer · · Score: 1

    without first registering...

    --
    nothing to see here - move along
  29. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by ole_timer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    she failed to register and then used foreign money. both are against the law.

    --
    nothing to see here - move along
  30. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Repubtards don't know about laws. Laws be damned. She was simply doing her duty as an American citizen...ohhhh wait.

  31. Free speech not absolute. by Comboman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Free speech is not an absolute right. Among the many forms of speech not protected by the first amendment: perjury, libel, slander, false advertising, inciting violence, copyright infringement, obscenity and threats. For the record, freedom of religion doesn't mean you can perform human sacrifices or polygamy and the right to bear arms doesn't include nuclear weapons. All rights have limits.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:Free speech not absolute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you blind? take a close look at WHERE those limits are put in place and by WHO. Maybe all CIA operatives in foreign soil should be arrested and thrown in jail

    2. Re:Free speech not absolute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Purely academic until the government shows up and takes my nukes.

    3. Re:Free speech not absolute. by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      For the record, freedom of religion doesn't mean you can perform human sacrifices or polygamy and the right to bear arms doesn't include nuclear weapons.

      Well, there goes my weekend plans! Got any more bad news for me?

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    4. Re:Free speech not absolute. by number6x · · Score: 2

      Freedom of speech doesn't let you incite others to do human sacrifices , or to bear nuclear arms for you either.

      I know, total bummer.

      The good news is that freedom of religion does allow you to pray to your god for them to sacrifice and bomb others. not that she ever listens any more. I blame the internet.

    5. Re:Free speech not absolute. by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      I am fairly certain that those countries where those operatives are operating are trying to do exactly that.

    6. Re:Free speech not absolute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All rights have limits.

      Even the right to be treated equally under the law regardless of race?

    7. Re:Free speech not absolute. by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Lying during political discourse is specifically allowed. The theory is that if it were prohibited, it would make all political rhetoric subject to law suits due to omissions or exaggerations.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    8. Re: Free speech not absolute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The previous post should be modded up, not down.

      It's a well thought out legal opinion with no malice, designed to educate. I can't decide if the poster is correct or not because it's complex and has more depth than any other post here. It may very well be written by a legal expert. Or it may be written by a sophist posing as one.

    9. Re: Free speech not absolute. by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The previous post should be modded up, not down.

      It's a well thought out legal opinion with no malice, designed to educate. I can't decide if the poster is correct or not because it's complex and has more depth than any other post here. It may very well be written by a legal expert. Or it may be written by a sophist posing as one.

      Disclaimer: No legal opinions were presented, only personal opinions and general observations about what I believe to be the current state of formal civics in the Unites States.

      I'm definitely not a legal expert. I do read scotusblog and popehat, though.

      The difference between me and a sophist is that a sophist gets paid. I'm on the Socrates Plan instead; I'm just telling people they're wrong to give them a chance to say something wise, that I might hear it and learn something. Rarely happens.

  32. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This isn't about free speech you fucking dope. She failed to register as a foreign agent with the DOJ.

    And I'm copying and pasting this part:

    "She failed to register with the DOJ as a foreign agent. she used foreign money to try and influence an election. those are both against federal law."

  33. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There are laws in the US that mandate that television ads provide disclaimers on who is funding political ads. Social media and the internet should be no different. I agree that this is a free speech issue but everyone should be well informed on who is paying to have their views expressed. That would make this all go away very quickly.

  34. Russian is smart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They wouldn't be able to sow discord if half of us weren't ratfuck crazy hateful scumbags.
    We deserve this for not allowing General Sherman to finish the damn job.

    1. Re:Russian is smart. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      We deserve this for not allowing General Patton to finish the damn job.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re: Russian is smart. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News Russia is not a communist country anymore. You can thank President Reagan for that. BTW he was a Republican.

    3. Re: Russian is smart. by HornWumpus · · Score: 0

      The only commies left are on western university campuses and caged in a theme park in Poland.

      Someone like Patton could fix Berkeley.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Russian is smart. by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Have you been in a coma for 25 years?

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  35. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She didn't fucking register.

    You people legit only see what you want to see. Repubtards. Smh.

  36. Re: Russia is using our uneducated racists agains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    knucklehead, I was calling out recent divisive bs

  37. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This.

    It's free speech only if it's speech I agree with. The repubtArd way.

  38. Re:Russia is using our uneducated racists against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What evidence and what charges? You can't because there is no evidence there is no proof. Just like your rape victims. No corroborative evidence. The Democrats are playing very childish games and its not going to win more elections.

  39. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Saudis for example tend to make significant donations to advocate for the candidates they want/quote.

    In the context of an election is highly illegal. Campaigns are not allowed to accept foreign money for the purposes of elections.

  40. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    If it's Americans paying her, isn't it them who should register, not her?

  41. The False Falg Begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America has way way way more bots, more election influence and interference than any other country. They attacked our abortion referendum in Ireland - the shadow government of America - the deep state.

  42. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    overly dramatic

  43. Re: George Soros anybody???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is George registered with the DOJ? He is?
    Is George using foreign money? He isn't?

    Was she Registered? She wasn't? Was she using illegal foreign funds? She was?

    Damn these two cases are nothing alike.

    You are an idiot for even agreeing with him.

  44. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The entire thing is bullshit to keep this Russia soap opera on the front page. It's pure DNC all the way, still covering their own ass and their own corrupt machine politics.

    Will someone please inform this AC that it's the Trump Justice Department that brought these charges?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  45. Butchersong sings Putin love songs while felating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a treasonous unAmerican faggot, so I'll just post that.

  46. THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES TRAITOR KEN DOLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There will be dire consequences for your life soon as you continue to push lies and your dishonest advocacy of traitors, KEN DOLL. You have crossed into danger by allying yourself with traitors and you will suffer for your lies.

  47. Yep, you can have all the speech you want by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    but there are laws about how you disclose that speech. Especially for non-citizens and people who work with and interact with non-citizens.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Yep, you can have all the speech you want by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Even Paris Hilton had to disclose her approval of her political message!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  48. Re: Russia is using our uneducated racists against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that Russian money bought BLM supporting Facebook ads in Chicago, I guess you are right that they are targeting ignorant, low information racists

  49. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by wardrich86 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Charged with "sowing discord"??! Should have tried sowing IRC instead

  50. Is she in custody? Or even in the jurisdiction? by michaelcole · · Score: 1

    Is she in custody? Or even in a jurisdiction where she would have to face trial? It would be swell if the 1000 copy/paste news articles about this included that BASIC REPORTING.

  51. Re:How you know it's all political theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thank you vlad for demonstrating how agitprop is used to undermine Western faith in Democracy

  52. Re:Is she in custody? Or even in the jurisdiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use your head. If you publish specific facts, you can be proven wrong. Better to use as few facts as possible. More opinion and speculation fits that way.

    The news isn't written to inform, but to influence.

  53. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by ole_timer · · Score: 2

    under Federal Election Commission (FEC) rules they have to register if they are advocating a vote. either way, they failed to register.

    --
    nothing to see here - move along
  54. Re: Russian illegal activities require hard action by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    We smell your fear. It's all you have.

    Let the people vote. Not the Russians.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  55. Who says? by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

    Organized targeted campaigns backed by financial resources are going to be tangibly effective at influencing people

    Only if the people are in a neutral state. Who is in a neutral state now that would be paying attention to anyone political. Exactly no-one.

    Yes we are doing quite a bit of that divide and conquer thing for partisan political reasons, but in the

    WTF. Did you just copy this from somewhere and forget to grab all the text? Talk about a suspicious post all on its own!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  56. Mr. Impersonator of me: Still sore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr. Impersonator of me: Still buttsore from an ASS-KICKING I gave you here https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... & https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... + https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... on hosts files?

    YES, obviously - lol, your "effete revenge" was DOWNMODS I ran you DRY of as always!

    After you tried VAINLY to "downmod" HIDE all of that here & UNDENIABLE https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... LITERALLY (I just reposted to NULLIFY your 'wannabe weapon' NEUTRALIZING it & EXPOSING YOU LOSING to me, lol!).

    APK

    P.S.=> I love it - especially seeing u REDUCED to TRYING to LIE about me (or LIBEL me) as you IMPERSONATE me (proving you WISH you were me, but you're INFERIOR imitation (& just plain INFERIOR on ALL levels))... apk

    1. Re: Mr. Impersonator of me: Still sore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What part of that post impersonated you? Where did the APK is dead post claim to be from APK? Do tell.

    2. Re: Mr. Impersonator of me: Still sore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We saw you impersonate APK https://linux.slashdot.org/com... c6gunner. Your name's on that post under your registered slashdot account but signing as APK.

    3. Re: Mr. Impersonator of me: Still sore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least you're not bitching about oh-so-scary postcards anymore. LOL.

    4. Re: Mr. Impersonator of me: Still sore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      APK was now caught trying to feign support for himself by posting unsigned.
      He thinks everyone is c6gunner and is so divorced from reality that he thinks everyone is impersonating him. Doesn't matter if it is parody or just straight up mockery.

    5. Re: Mr. Impersonator of me: Still sore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a hypocrite. You post anonymously trying to support yourself but c6gunner we saw you impersonate APK https://linux.slashdot.org/com...

    6. Re: Mr. Impersonator of me: Still sore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not c6gunner or any of the other people you stalk and I am not pretending to be them. If you aren't APK then you are an even bigger retard than he is since he isn't even sticking up for himself because these statements about him are true. How's your boyfriend doing, giving you enough BBC in your $1 home? Did you ever get that Yoda doll removed from your ass?

    7. Re: Mr. Impersonator of me: Still sore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You project that you're a coward that stalks apk by unidentifiable anonymous posts who is gay and has no home of his own.

  57. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Money is fungible. Foreigners contribute to the candidates 'global charity fund'. Abracadabra, legal influence peddling.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  58. Can we be clear here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "sow division"
    NOT
    "get trump elected".

  59. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Aighearach · · Score: 0

    Americans don't have to register to sow discord, we get to shout "freeze peach!" whenever anybody complains. As long as we do it in America.

    If we go to Russia and make statements to sow discord, we should definitely be registered with the local authorities and be following their rules for foreign lobbying.

    But still, regardless of who paid her, she would have to register because she is herself a foreigner. If she was an American and receiving foreign money for it, she would also have to register. So it is a double-failure-to-register; she needed to be registered to do it at all because of who she is, and she also would need to be registered to do it with the money she used because of who the money was from.

    If she wants a freeze peach, she'll need to figure out how to get one of those in Russia. It seems unlikely though.

  60. Re: Russian illegal activities require hard action by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

    Let the people vote. Not the Russians.

    Handing out ballots to everyone means everyone can vote, even people who shouldn't. The "Russian influence" has never been alleged Russian voting. Your proposed solution is not a solution to whatever problem there is with Russian influence.

    I don't know what fear you smell. I'm not afraid to point out your mistake. Are you?

  61. I have meddling friends by Tokolosh · · Score: 0

    A number of my non-US friends, some living in the US, some not, have been posting political commentary and promoting particular candidates and parties on Facebook. Hint: Not Republicans.

    Should I report them to the DoJ?

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    1. Re:I have meddling friends by jeff4747 · · Score: 2

      As long as their home country's government is not funding their efforts, they're legal.

    2. Re:I have meddling friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does that make a difference? A private foreign PAC would be okay?

    3. Re:I have meddling friends by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Why does that make a difference? A private foreign PAC would be okay?

      If it registers as a PAC yes. The one in this article did not register. And you need to register to be allowed to "sow discord" in the US.

      Once you register though, you are can sow as much discord as you want and people will just assume you are run of the mill Republican trying to tank the country.

    4. Re:I have meddling friends by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Why does that make a difference?

      Because the law says so. Whether or not that should matter is fine to debate, but currently you have to tell the US government you are getting paid by a foreign government.

      A private foreign PAC would be okay?

      IIRC, it would not be OK directly, but that PAC could create and fund a PAC in the US to dodge it.

  62. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Your "Russian" distraction works for both sides, a little bit better for the DNC since they were caught actually discussing and practicing real fraud, and are now projecting. I don't care who leaked those emails, they performed a valuable public service. It was the public's reaction that went haywire. They had a chance to vote both republicans and democrats out.

    The corruption is home grown. There's nothing to blame the Russians for, but I understand the purpose of doing so, and I have to admit, the campaign is working like a charm. No more of that silly talk about third parties anymore.

  63. Re: Russia is using our uneducated racists agains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks like you hate women - you need to be more respectful of people - the event ended when he entered his apartment - he should have buzzed himself in - people in NYC know how this works

  64. Re: Russia is using our uneducated racists against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If BLM ads scare people for whatever reason, and buying those ads to shove in the face of voters you want to vote against Democrats works, it's one fucked up world.

    In other words, helping get one side's message out loudly, to all the voters, works against the speakers and in favor of their opponents.

    Feel bad because manipulation gaming the system...when all you are really doing is letting people know what one political side wants to do. Does the BLM side of the democrats want to silence themselves lest voters actually hear them?

    I am in favor of either side trumpeting the other side's own words to hurt them at the voting booth, but is this wrong in this case because Ivan pushed it?

  65. KEN DOLL YOUR LIES WILL HAVE CONSEQUENCES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Traitors hang, Ken Doll. Rope is coming into your life soon. Strong rope.

  66. How is this a chargeable offense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Interference in elections" = participation in the public political discussion.
    "Sowing discord" = Promoting non-consensual political opinions.

    Remind me again how this is inappropriate? Illegal?

  67. Re:Russia is using our uneducated racists against by dbreeze · · Score: 1

    https://qmap.pub/ -- certainly worth investigation and consideration regardless of your conclusion...

    --
    When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
  68. Re:Russia is using our uneducated racists against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It isn't just 'uneducated' types, it's also 'wilfully ignorant' types. They don't know any better, and they don't want to know any better, they're comfy in their small-and-narrow mindedness and have no intention to improve. It's just too scary to try to wrap their heads around things like 'different isn't always bad' and 'change can be good'. They would much rather drag us all back to about 1940 socio-politically speaking, and keep us there, forever, like it's Groundhog Day, except unlike the characters in that movie they never learn any important life lessons and never do anything different. Kind of like living in the first part of Pleasantville, where everything is literally black-and-white -- and things becoming colored is not what they want.

  69. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Bert64 · · Score: 0

    Big companies like microsoft and google spend a lot of money to influence elections, much of this money has been derived from foreign sources of income and many executives of large companies are foreigners.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  70. Re: SuperKendall and ArchangelMichael are examples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, yeah... martyring them would produce no positive benefit.

    Better to give them long lives so they can learn how wrong they have been

  71. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not the Trump Justice Department, damnit, it's The United States Department of Justice. Believe it or not, despite his best efforts to piss all over every part of the Federal government to make it smell like him, Trump has not managed to corrupt, subvert, and destroy every single part of our government, and in this case, our top-level law enforcement, Herr Sessions notwithstanding. At least at some level we still have the Rule of Law here, at least for the moment.

  72. It is find for news organizations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So she is doing the same thing CNN and NBC and all others news organizations are doing... spreading lies.

    I thought the meddling had something to do with actually changing someone's vote? Granted, spreading of lies will affect Democrat voters since they will believe just about everything, Republicans are more likely to figure out when something is a lie.

  73. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by ole_timer · · Score: 3, Informative

    but they register. she didn't.

    --
    nothing to see here - move along
  74. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by jeff4747 · · Score: 2

    And the companies are American (incorporated in the US), and Citizens United is still precedent. So that's legal.

  75. Re: Russia is using our uneducated racists against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes.

  76. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, the Justice Department that Trump despises. The one that's investigating his gang.

  77. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Foreigners aren't supposed to participate in our elections.

    Any of them vote? No? Then they didn't participate.

    Look, the problem is not the propaganda or where it comes from, it's your choice to believe... You all are merely trying to cover up your own failures and blame others for your own bad choices. It's quite normal and natural, but now it's time to grow up.

    Your shtick about 'fraud' is simple regurgitation. Weed is illegal too, since when does the law deserve any respect?

    Sorry, Ivan...bla bla bla

    LOL! This is why you people will get no respect either, and will continue to lose

  78. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by hey! · · Score: 1

    I don't think most people understand the First Amendment; it doesn't protect you from legal consequences of speech, like inciting riots, libel, obscenity, or revealing state secrets. Nor does it exempt you from laws regulating the manner and circumstances of speech; you can't shout through a bullhorn at your neighbor at 3am, even if you're shouting political slogans. And it certainly doesn't exempt you from laws regulating the behavior of foreign agents on US soil, for example by laundering foreign money to obscure its source.

    The First Amendment does not preclude government regulation of speech; instead it sets a very high bar, particularly for prior restraint. There has to be a significant public interest (like national security) involved, the regulation must be narrowly tailored (i.e. it must address just the interest at stake without affecting any other speech), and it has to be administered in an even-handed manner. Falsehood is largely protected, because of the difficulty of people agreeing on the truth, but false speech made with actual malice and fraudulent intent can be legally punished.

    So yes, this woman can be prosecuted for spreading discord in this particular way. If the government of Russia wants to sow discord in the US, it and its citizens are free to do so, and American citizens are free to assist them, as long as they do so transparently.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  79. Re: Russia is using our uneducated racists against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Atleast these 'uneducated racists' aren't hell bent upon invading another middles-east country for no good reason and cause a few thousand deaths,and greatly increase the chances of WW3.

    These 'uneducated racists' are really making the rest of the world safer and as much as you may deny it,America's economy is in the best shape in decades.

  80. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The difference is that she works for our adversary and she got caught for breaking the law. Just because CIA got away with shit doesn't make what they did right or legal. Some of what CIA did was for national security, some were just outright criminal.

  81. Re:Russia is using our uneducated racists against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is it you want me to learn from that website?

    It looks like a Russian propaganda command and control center to mobilize American rubes against their country's rule of law and values.

  82. Re:Russia is using our uneducated racists against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nice try ivan but we know it's you.

    What you really did was try to get us at each other's throats. Same as you continue to do. And the way you run antifa.

  83. Re:Russia is using our uneducated racists against by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Especially by cultivating Donald Trump to launder Russian money and repeatedly betray his country, Russia's use of uneducated racists to accomplish their political goals is their most brilliant scheme.

    Fixed that for you.

    In reality, the Russians target people of any political persuasion. They are trying to cause partisan divides. Now, they have been most successful with the "uneducated racist" camp, but they've been about half to one fifth as successful with a bunch of liberal groups.

    And it's a pretty Amercia-centric point of view. They successfully invaded Crimea. They got Britain to start the dissolution of the EU.. They're propping up fascist states in Eastern Europe. And it's unclear how far reaching their expansion of influence into the Middle East will be.

    --
    Your ad here. Ask me how!
  84. Re: Russia is using our uneducated racists agains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it didn't, she continued to berate him after he entered his apartment and never apologized. I would have supported him if he shot her dead. She still deserves it, as do all nazi faggots like yourself.

  85. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    But in this case isn't it the firm that has to register.

    Because it doesn't seem to make sense to ask the employees to register.

  86. Someone needs to shoot Horny Swampwuss in the face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ASAP, someone needs to take this cowardly un-American traitor Horny SwampWuss behind the shed the faggot lives in and END HIS TREASONOUS FAGGOT LIFE.

    Find his family. Kill em all, traitors deserve worse.

  87. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    "But still, regardless of who paid her, she would have to register because she is herself a foreigner."

    Do you mean that because she's an employee of a foreign company that sells political ad campaigns to Americans she has to register herself, whether her employer already has or hasn't, if she doesn't want to get arrested when she travels to the US on other business.

  88. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by ole_timer · · Score: 2

    she got charged with essentially the same thing as manafort - failing to register as a foreign agent. kinda like capone and taxes. as for the FEC that would be an organization with American money who has to register. she did not get charged with that. and the supreme court essentially made orgs individuals and allowed them to contribute. but yes, it would be the org not the person.

    --
    nothing to see here - move along
  89. HORNY SWAMPWUSS WILL HANG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TRAITORS HANG.

  90. Could it be this upstate New York prison cook? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1
  91. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    I can see that if the ones paying for the ads aren't American. But I find that's a stretch.

    And that particular accusation coming from the US, who has an ongoing history of bloody foreign political manipulation, is ironic.

  92. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Aighearach · · Score: 0

    For the billionth time, if you conduct business in the US, you are conducting business in the US. It is really that simple.

    Yes, if you are a foreigner and spend money in the US to influence American politics or to represent a foreign entity, then you have to be registered. No, there isn't an international quota of one registration, so no, you can't just say, "Golly, somebody else might have been registered, why me?"

    Nobody cares if you're working on behalf of a foreign company. If it isn't registered in the US, you certainly can't hide behind it. You're responsible for your own actions when you do business in a foreign country, you can't just point at a piece of paper in your home country and expect it to somehow shield you.

    If you engage in illegal conduct in the United States, even if you do it remotely, you can expect to be arrested when you travel to any modern country, not just the US.

  93. Yells Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Well, there's this Elena Pussynova, total Fake News, I don't know her but Vlad tells me she is a Very Fine Person. And he was powerful and persuasive, Very Fine!

    The Failing New York Times and my Not Justice Department says she hacked our election. Disgusting! Something something Kavanaugh, something Clinton, something Colin Kaepernick. Stormy Daniels! Blah blah blah, Omarosa!

    I grabbed myself some Pussynova, she's a great chick, I can tell, The Best!

    No Collusion folks, Believe Me! No Collusion!"

  94. Rob Mueller indicts a Russian pancake by guacamole · · Score: 0

    In other news, the special prosecutor Rob Mueller inches closer towards proving Trump's collusion with Kremlin by indicting a Russian pancake. The pancake was not available for comment. News at 11', Tonight!

  95. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    Thanks, I hadn't realized she was actually running campaigns while she was here, still it's ironic considering what the US does to other countries.

    And who's paying for this ...

  96. What exact crime was committed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In reading the article it seems the people here posted a bunch of random stuff (true or not) on Facebook etc. They may have violated some policy of those companies but how is this speech 'illegal'? Just because it comes from a non-US citizen e.g. 'foreign national'? Shit I'm a Canadian in the US, I hope my speech is protected, especially if I bash Trump in a Tweet.

    And how is 'conspiracy' here illegal, just because people get together to say bad things doesn't make that illegal.

    Long story short, it seems the US is trying to criminalize speech & I find that just bizarre. Of course the fact that their Russian & will never show up for a trial means that the US can charge them with any random thing they want & it won't ever go to trial to be dismissed.

  97. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No I get the intent of the 1st amendment, I just think it's a stretch to say the acts here are illegal. If a US Citizen was paying to do this would that be illegal? If not, then a foreign national doing it can't make that speech illegal. Or at least I hope not, since as a Canadian living legally in the US I sure hope that if I start randomly tweeting bizarre shit about Trump or Hilary that I won't be tried with a 'speech crime'. Anonymous speech is also protected, so paying someone else to speak on my behalf while not giving up my identity doesn't make it criminal.

    The point is there are limits to 'free speech' (fraud, defamation of character etc.) I don't see how this rises to any level of 'illegal' like this though.

    The big deal is I didn't see anything in the article that Americans haven't been saying themselves, especially politicians & the Media, are we now going to lock them up for 'sowing discord'? Seriously?

    Hate the Russians all you want but at least charge them with real crimes.

  98. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    This seems very strange to me.

    Defending the institutions of democracy seems strange to you?

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  99. Food for thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So did the Podesta group. Everyone but Manafort got to register after the fact...

  100. Re: SuperKendall and ArchangelMichael are examples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I disagree, I think that ship has sailed and they need consequences for a lifetime spent sowing discord and lying to accomplish it. They are traitors, the difference being they aren't good enough at it to warrant Rubles in the mail.

    They are still traitors who deserve to hang on the merits. America needs to get back to basics - nazis and their propagandists need to die hanging from a rope.

  101. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by kwbauer · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    She was not in the USA, dope. Is the US going to go after every foreign national that posts online comments about the US or stuff happening in the US because such comments may influence somebody in the US?

  102. QMAP.PUB by dbreeze · · Score: 0

    https://qmap.pub/ -- in case you want to know what's really going on...

    --
    When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
  103. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by kwbauer · · Score: 1

    So every person in Europe that comments on Facebook or Slashdot about how the USA sucks because we still mostly honor the 2nd Amendment to our Constitution should be charged with election fraud? Somebody, somewhere paid for their internet connection so money was spent to "promote" that message. Such comments are extremely political in nature. Such comments can be expected to influence an election just as much as comments about supposed Klansmen.

  104. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by kwbauer · · Score: 1

    Did she personally do anything on US soil?

  105. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

    Yeah, the Justice Department that Trump despises. The one that's investigating his gang.

    He has the authority to fire them all.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  106. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excellent comrade. Sew that discord and keep the GOP in power this wonderful winter season. We are all counting on you.

  107. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhh The Justice Department is part of the Executive Branch. He is in charge of it. It's not a 4th branch of government. He has every Constitutional authority to direct these Departments/Agencies.

  108. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    those are both against federal law.

    So is weed... WTF?!

    What, you can't buy ad time anymore? Fuck you people! Learn how to ignore propaganda!

  109. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a precursor to Democrats in government criminally charging citizens for arguing with them online. That is a direct path to massive political assassinations if and when it occurs.

  110. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by hey! · · Score: 1

    You're assuming it's some kind of speech regulation law she's been charged under. She hasn't; she's been charged with fraud.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  111. Re: Russia is using our uneducated racists agains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except you left out that he stole her bicycle the week before and she recognized him.

  112. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Americans never seem to understand that their laws mean nothing to anyone but them.
    It's a mental issue they have thinking they are the centre of the universe.

  113. Pot, say hello to kettle.. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    as you are both black as coal. Actually they probably have the higher moral ground as aren't straight up funding coups like the CIA did.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  114. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by dog77 · · Score: 2

    This seems very strange to me.

    I agree and think this is not a good direction for the USA. Political speech is very subjective. Talk radio and other news outlets are spending a great deal of money influencing the election. Why is it ok for these organizations to spend money on political issues, but I am limited with my own money unless I am rich enough to buy my own radio or tv station?

    It has been all the rage to support campaign finance reform (get money out of politics!), but it has always been a bad idea because adding complex laws just makes things more complex and unfair. We should repeal McCain - Feingold because did it really make politics better?

  115. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

    Doesn't change a damned thing I said. The POTUS is still accountable to the Constitution and to the Citizens of the United States. POTUS is not King, nor Dictator.

  116. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't see anything in the article saying she was in the US. This is typical American thought that their laws apply worldwide.
    You could say you expect any American who drinks to be arrested if they travel to any modern country, for breaking Saudi laws.

    Americans don't have a firm grasp of reality, it's funny though.

  117. Re:Russia is using our uneducated racists against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    30 seconds is more than enough time to conclude that it's complete horseshit, you mean?

  118. Re: Russia is using our uneducated racists agains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    keep on spewing bullshit ivan nobody cares and everybody sees that putin is satan

  119. Re:If I had to choose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I greatly prefer uneducated racists, to the large number of educated racists occupying the Democrats at the moment.

    At least someone uneducated, can be educated... instead of thinking they already know what is best.

    I'll just sit in my little independent safe zone, until people get Woken and not Woke.

    So Super-ken-dull has finally gone from libertarian.bullshit artist to just a little nazi.

  120. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If someone can be classified as a foreign agent their words and actions get judged under a different set of rules. And in today's world just having innocuous conversations or being tangentially associated with a foreigner can be viewed as a nefarious act. Being Russian means the bar is set so low in determining whether or not a person is operating as a foreign agent is easy. And it works in reverse. If an American talks to a Russian that is proof enough the American is a traitor. The US-Russian relationship is so toxic that no one in the US government is going to talk to a Russian about anything. When Trump met with Putin his detractors all but declared him a traitor. Same thing happened when Trump met with the NK leader. One minute he was being castigated for threatening NK with a military strike coupled with no diplomacy and the next minute he was being castigated trying to use diplomacy to solve the problem. If you cannot talk to your enemies than how do you solve any of the problems? It's obvious 60+ years of NK diplomacy never produced a single positive result. And the US has spent the Obama years not engaging in any meaningful diplomacy with Russia. This resulted in Russia invading the Ukraine and annexing Crimea while financing a war targeting the Ukraine government. Obama said nothing when Russia supplied missiles shot down a commercial airliner. Obama knew about the Russian interference in the last election and did nothing. All of Russia's misdeeds happened on his watch not Trump's. Obama, like the rest of the world, knew Clinton was going to win the election and didn't want to rock the boat. If Clinton had won the election there would have been no investigations into Russia's interference in the election. Facebook would not have been hauled before Congress for allowing Russian ads and misinformation being posted on it's platform.

  121. lies, 90+ year old Illuminati = ohh scary russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    90+ year old faggots who run this planet still lie and push the fake news russian psy op narrative

    these old faggots, and their subservient faggots who serve them (people like utah sentaors) can't die fast enough.

    in another 20 years when the old guard finally fucking dies, you won't hear about scary russia anymore.

  122. Next Up: Trumpsky and his marry clan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fn traitorz.

  123. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only Elon has registered!

  124. Fuck off: Everybody's got a right to influence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called free speech. I get that they don't like when its funded by a foreign government that is an "enemy" to certain people... but that doesn't excuse those in power from violating everybody's right to expression regardless of what that expression entails.

    1. Re:Fuck off: Everybody's got a right to influence by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      Shh...don't remind people that America has a 1st Amendment.

  125. The American people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Russia, China and Iran ...

    Morons, the lot of them: The American people are so willing to vilify socialism, gun control, celebrity-driven speech and each other, there's no need to pay a foreigner to do it. Even better, an American person can spread fake news and "misinformation online", legally.

  126. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by superwiz · · Score: 2

    she failed to register and then used foreign money. both are against the law.

    False.

    Only agents of foreign governments have to register. Whatever "project lachta" was, it has not been proved that it's a front for a government. Nor was she charged with not registering. So your assertion that this is the crime at hand is unfounded.

    Spending foreign money on advocating issues (rather than advocating for any candidate) is legal. This was decided by Bluman vs FEC. Specifically, the FEC website says

    In a decision that was later affirmed by the Supreme Court, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the foreign national ban “does not restrain foreign nationals from speaking out about issues or spending money to advocate their views about issues. It restrains them only from a certain form of expressive activity closely tied to the voting process—providing money for a candidate or political party or spending money in order to expressly advocate for or against the election of a candidate.” Bluman v. FEC, 800 F. Supp. 2d 281, 290 (D.D.C. 2011), aff’d 132 S. Ct. 1087 (2012).

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  127. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by superwiz · · Score: 1

    Free speech is an institution of democracy. Without it, you can the same vote tallies as you do in North Korea.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  128. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by superwiz · · Score: 1

    You only have to register if you act as an agent of a foreign state. If you manage money of a private organization, which is not doing anything illegal (and spreading false political narrative is not illegal), you don't have to register.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  129. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by superwiz · · Score: 1

    That's probably bad reporting. The statute which she was charged with is conspiracy to X,Y, or Z. The X is "fraud". But all these charges are usually Y, Z or something down the list (which is not fraud, but something like do something illegal). Some of the (alleged) Russian agents who were previously charged were charged with identify theft (which falls under fraud), but, in this case, she is not alleged to have conducted any fraudulent transactions, so fraud is probably not the part of the conspiracy statute that's being used.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  130. Hillary should be charged too by melted · · Score: 0

    Sheâ(TM)s been âoesowing discordâ for 3 years straight by now.

  131. Re:Russia is using our uneducated racists against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Half-baked conspiracy theories combined with a little salt of actual fact here and there.

    This is the hall-mark of most troll websites today. The verifiable fact for every 10 conjectures with no facts makes it plausible, right?? Right??

  132. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are:
    a. intentionally misleading people
    b. spending non-american money in america to influence opinion on an election
    c. doing this through a person who is not registered as a foreign agent

    Then yes, and don't fly to america or you would be arrested.

    The difference between a citizen and an organisation is the difference between a crime and a conspiracy, and in this case the 'crime' you're talking about doesn't exist.

    Saying 'Trump sucks!" and you're German, well, more power to you.
    Paying American Sally in Kansas to tweet "Trump Sucks", and you're German, is definitely illegal if Sally has not registered as a foreign agent and declared the intention with the federal government.

  133. Re: Russia is using our uneducated racists agains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what I saw this week as a reaction to this story - lots of fake youtube news reports by "foxnews" and "time" where the narrator was computer generated and the knuckleheads kept posting that she needs to be killed - you dumb fucks lost your mind!

  134. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by dryeo · · Score: 1

    though I am not one to think the constitution applies to non-citizens.

    Do you really believe it is OK to torture green card holders, throw them in jail with no due process, search their homes without a warrant, deny them speech etc?
    If you read the Constitution, there is a lot of talk about people, persons and such and little about citizens and what there is, is mostly about political stuff like having to be a natural citizen to be President.
    Even for voting, it doesn't say anything about citizenship and denying the vote to tax paying permanent residents goes against one of the founding principles of America, namely "no taxation without representation"

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  135. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes

  136. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *Youâ(TM)re

  137. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He thinks your raciss for not allowing the outright invasion of America by foreign criminals. Who need to be fed and clothed and housed and educated, but he ain't paying right

  138. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Deflect is you're mo. When they cross the border without authorization they are criminals. What's so hard to understand? Sky be green for you?

  139. Re: Russia is using our uneducated racists agains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    agreed; Ivan2 and Putin suck, sometimes at the same time;
    -Ivan1

  140. You fuck with mother Russia.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Russia lost over 24 million people in WW2, nearly a quarter of their population. Since then they take their security quite seriously.
    If you thought they were just going to roll over as you executed a coup in the Ukraine and tried to cut off their access to the Black Sea you were sorely mistaken.
    The CIA has used the divide and conquer tactic to destroy opposing governments all around the world for at least 100 years. Now it is being used against the US quite spectacularly.
    Enjoy the fruits of what your government sowed.

    1. Re:You fuck with mother Russia.... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Enjoy the fruits of what your government sowed.

      Ah, the irony.
      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/wor...

      Russia lost 24 million people because they used their soldiers as cannon fodder. Literally.

      Right now Putin is desperately trying to pretend Russia has global significance while acting like a tinpot dictator of some shitty African or South American state.

      Actually, I take that back. They wouldn't pose for homoerotic calendars. Putin appears to like the boys fancying him.

  141. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

    Using your right of free speech to subvert democracy is roughly equivalent to using your right to own a knife to kill somebody with it.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
  142. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, wait - has the DNC registered as a foreign agent now? 'Cuz Democrats sure do love those big suitcases full of cash from the Chinese government.

  143. Re: SuperKendall and ArchangelMichael are examples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are you a pimple-faced 13yo who's just venting his frustration or a genuine idiot? it's hard to tell, maybe you're both

  144. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by astrofurter · · Score: 1

    "Freeze Peach!"

    Why do you hate Freedom? Why don't you move somewhere without free speech? Some of them are quite nice places - just don't say anything against the party line.

    There are millions of immigrants who would be happy to take your place, to enjoy & defend the freedom of speech that you hold in such low regard.

  145. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "she failed to register with the DOJ as a foreign agent. she used foreign money to try and influence an election. those are both against federal law."

    It never stopped Abe Foxman and the ADL, why should she be the exception and not the rule?

  146. Re:How you know it's all political theater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You really have not been keeping up with how insecure those fucking machines are. This is getting tiring... shed some light on things... russians... bad thing happens... russians... hacking happens... only russians can do it... fuck...

    posting word: "blankets", how appropriate.

  147. Re:Russia is using our uneducated racists against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need to "Lock Him Up!" with all of his treasonous co-conspirators with his campaign manager Paul Manafort who is already in prison.

    An attack on the democratic system itself isn't something you put people in prison for.
    When voter suppression happens it is a larger threat to the country than events like the 9/11 attacks.
    If capital punishment isn't used for that we might just as well get rid of it.

  148. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go back to your free speech zone buddy.

  149. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hillary lost. Get over it.

  150. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If i recall Odumbo took millions through foreign nationals but nothing was done...

    https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/obama-campaign-raises-illegal-cash-overseas/

    Go ahead. Google it. All using various shady but valid loopholes. Goooo team Dimwits. Party of hypocrisy

  151. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by hey! · · Score: 1

    She's charged under a section of USC called "Conspiracy to Commit Fraud against the United States", which SCOTUS has defined to include interfering with government functions.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  152. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

    The first amendment protects citizens and does provide some protections to non citizens , but an agent of hostile power isn't going to be protected if they aren't genuine political actors. If an American citizen bangs on about being a fan of ISIS , well he won't be popular and the feds would be looking hard at him, but it's protected speech. But if a visitor or non citizen starts engaging in organised behavior to support ISIS, they are gonna get Gitmo'd. Obviously the lines a fine one and it's going to involve 200+ years of case law and a lot of lawyers yelling at each other but there is a distinction and it exists for good reasons

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  153. Critique us? go straight to jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sad really, how am I supposed to have faith in the system now?

  154. Hypocrites. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you, America. Just... fuck you.

    You influence the elections of nearly half the fucking world already. You set up nearly every dictator in South America. You assassinated the leader of Iran and caused a civil war. All of this is available in declassified documents that your politicians gloat about. The worst part is that you don't even fucking hide it anymore, you put your foreign meddling right up on TV programs that are shown in other countries. Just look at this fine example of John Oliver influencing the Canadian elections that reached 11 million views: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0V5ckcTSYu8

    And now you're afraid of fucking MEMES on the INTERNET influencing your elections, as if your own domestic institutions such as corporations and universities aren't doing that already. Well look at that, you provide an example for the world to live up to and then you get mad when they follow it.

    You made this bed, now you're getting fucked in it!

  155. Re: George Soros anybody???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soros is funding violent riots and the only thing you're worried about is whether or not the funds are foreign?!

    I think you just might be legally retarded.

  156. Re:Russia is using our uneducated racists against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that this is pile of trash post is modded +3, Insightful is proof that meddling is happening.

    Just not Russian meddling. This smells Democratic.

  157. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    "I didn't see anything in the article saying she was in the US."

    Right. I was confusing her with Maria Butina:

    https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/w...

  158. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 0

    Found the ultra-right-wing conservative white nationalist facist. Please kill yourself, you're holding back the evolution of our species, you throwback.

  159. Re: Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck off you ignorant cunt

  160. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    For the billion and 1st time, if the business you do is in the US, you did business in the US.

    When you order a pizza over the telephone, you're doing business wherever you're calling from, you're also doing business wherever the pizza place is located. Very very simple.

    If you're paying somebody who is in the US, for them to do activities in the US, and those activities are also illegal in the US, then you broke the law in the US.

    There is nothing hard about this.

  161. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

    So if I got this right, if American's bought the ads, they broke the law, the ad agency broke the law, it's employees broke the law, and everyone in the US who participated in the ads broke the law, and they're all acting as foreign agents.

  162. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > though I am not one to think the constitution applies to non-citizens

    What a stupid thing to say. It applies to anyone in US territory, or did you think tourists visiting from other countries have no constitutional rights?

    Also: the Constitution of the USA is based on the idea that ALL people have these rights. The fact that we can't enforce the constitution in other countries should not abrogate those rights.

  163. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by ole_timer · · Score: 1

    political action committees have to register, and give donator lists. fake news orgs don't. welcome to america.

    --
    nothing to see here - move along
  164. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by ole_timer · · Score: 1

    read the indictment.

    --
    nothing to see here - move along
  165. Have you looked at the so-called Russian ads? by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    I remember an article linking to some of the ads that were apparently on Facebook. I think I recall seeing maybe 2-3 of them. But what kind of surprised and shocked me - the amount of truth in the supposed Russian ads and memes as compared to typical political ads. I kept going, well...that's true. Ya, America did do that. Yup, that's mostly true to. Okay, so basically the issue is they created memes that were based on facts, and that further divided Americans. Heck, Americans are so divided, but most of the American memes on both the left and right are half truths and taken out of context. I started to actually feel that maybe we need more Russian news and input into our society.

  166. RUSSIA..... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Apparently, the only one in America that actually gives a crap about the midterm elections.

  167. Remember When by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember when Republicans used to be the party of Law & Order? Now, we all know they only got hard-core on enforcement against black people, and brown people, and women, and the poor.

    Now however, even that "eternal value" has gone by the wayside. A Russian and (presumed) white person breaks the law and Republicans are all, "what's the big deal, it's just opinion, and everyone does it!"

    Funny how self-interest and hypocrisy changes those unchanging values. Too bad for them that I have a long memory and a low tolerance for nonsense.

  168. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by superwiz · · Score: 1
    No. The "923. 18 U.S.C. 371—Conspiracy to Defraud the United States" reads (emphasis mine):

    If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

    Notice the "commit any offense... OR to defraud..."? This means that committing any coordination between a few people (which has, as its goal, committing a crime) qualifies. Because any coordination to commit a crime is legally a "conspiracy". As long as what the people plotted to do is itself illegal, the fact that they did it together is what qualifies them to be charged under this statute. It need not be fraud. The reporters don't read beyond the sensationalist heading of the statute. But even the simplest parse of the 1st paragraph shows that fraud need not be a part of it.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  169. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by superwiz · · Score: 1

    read the indictment.

    This type of statement is white noise every single time. I gave you an exact quote from the Federal Election Commission. You have nothing. Otherwise, post the link and the relevant statute, regulation, or judicial opinion. You have nothing.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  170. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    No, if Americans bought the ads, they broke the law. If the ad agency broke the law or not depends on what they knew. Same as anybody else you sweep in with "participated."

    If you're acting on behalf of a foreign entity, you might be a foreign agent. Seems kinda obvious just from the words "foreign" and "agent."

  171. Re:Charged with "sowing discord"??! by superwiz · · Score: 1

    No, lying is not the same thing as knifing someone. In fact, that's why you need free speech. So that political disagreements could be hashed out with words rather than violence.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.