People complain when thier possesions are specifically banned, so rather than banning model x894-series f cell phones (or what ever models originally interfered with the instrumentation) from ninteen eighty nine, they just ask that no one use thier cell phone.
Its a combination of PR and precautions.
well the IS6 part, at any rate. but it shouldnt be that much of a deal, they only have a relative handful of users. I say its sloppy code
Re:Depends on the kind of graffiti
on
Reverse Graffiti
·
· Score: 1
I've actually made a small zine out of it, and it sold rather well from what I hear from the two local record stores to which I gave them.
go figure.
Re:Depends on the kind of graffiti
on
Reverse Graffiti
·
· Score: 1
Well see pictures get you caught, which is the main reason I dont leave my name. So no, I dont. And if I did, It wouldnt be the greatest idea for me to show you.
However This [stencilrevolution.com] is the same 3 layer technique that I like to use.
Re:Depends on the kind of graffiti
on
Reverse Graffiti
·
· Score: 1
the pretty ones or the young ones?
or the ones that look like Orlando Bloom in LotR?
Re:Depends on the kind of graffiti
on
Reverse Graffiti
·
· Score: 3, Informative
People that seek out art are not my audience, I want to shove art into the faces of those who would not or does not have the time to look at art.
Putting my ideas into canvas and hanging them on walls just doesnt do what graffing does. It doesnt show anyone something they arnt expecting.
Re:Depends on the kind of graffiti
on
Reverse Graffiti
·
· Score: 5, Interesting
I've been graffing (its an industry term) for the last 5 years. I never leave my name, so its not really a tag. However I feel that using a designated wall is useless. The point of Graffing to me, at least, is to subject (as infringe on others) the unwary to art. Putting a 3 foot Venus DeMilo on a wall in a grubby factory is a much more fufilling act than putting that same stencil on a wall thats designated for art. Two distinct demographics really.
People complain when thier possesions are specifically banned, so rather than banning model x894-series f cell phones (or what ever models originally interfered with the instrumentation) from ninteen eighty nine, they just ask that no one use thier cell phone. Its a combination of PR and precautions.
or cell phones have evolved to emit less interference. (which is in fact the case)
who ever told you that was a liar. i cant even see the screen, let alone read anything.
Cafe decible (a small place here in arizona, thats about to go broke) plays metal.
no numetal though...
Yakuza? wasnt that the name of the treaty or oragnization created to manage echleon?
Yeah, I noticed that too.
well the IS6 part, at any rate. but it shouldnt be that much of a deal, they only have a relative handful of users. I say its sloppy code
I've actually made a small zine out of it, and it sold rather well from what I hear from the two local record stores to which I gave them. go figure.
Well see pictures get you caught, which is the main reason I dont leave my name. So no, I dont. And if I did, It wouldnt be the greatest idea for me to show you. However This [stencilrevolution.com] is the same 3 layer technique that I like to use.
the pretty ones or the young ones? or the ones that look like Orlando Bloom in LotR?
People that seek out art are not my audience, I want to shove art into the faces of those who would not or does not have the time to look at art. Putting my ideas into canvas and hanging them on walls just doesnt do what graffing does. It doesnt show anyone something they arnt expecting.
I've been graffing (its an industry term) for the last 5 years. I never leave my name, so its not really a tag. However I feel that using a designated wall is useless. The point of Graffing to me, at least, is to subject (as infringe on others) the unwary to art. Putting a 3 foot Venus DeMilo on a wall in a grubby factory is a much more fufilling act than putting that same stencil on a wall thats designated for art. Two distinct demographics really.