Slashdot Mirror


Mac OS X Panther On A 25MHz Centris 650

Currawong writes "danamania, well known for making the most of 68k Macs, has done the ultimate, and installed Mac OS X Panther on an old Centris with 68MB RAM, a 25MHz 68040 and 4GB drive - an early 90's machine with about the same power as a NeXT cube. To achieve this, she's had to run it under PearPC on Debian, resulting in a severe performance hit, as generic emulation runs "about 500 times slower" according to the developers. On this approximately 0.05MHz G3 speed emulator, the boot screen has taken 1.5 hours to appear, and the ETA for full boot is almost exactly 1 week! Regular updates are being posted as each milestone in the boot process is reached."

499 comments

  1. Very simple question... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Why?

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Very simple question... by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because it was there?

      --
      Sig
    2. Re:Very simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Simple answer:
      because you can

    3. Re:Very simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      someone has way too much free time...

    4. Re:Very simple question... by mekkab · · Score: 5, Funny

      WTF else are you gonna do with a Centris? Play Marathon?! Or Spectre VR?

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    5. Re:Very simple question... by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why?

      For those who haven't bothered to mouse-over that foot icon attached to the story, it's indicates that this story has been attached to a category known as "It's Funny. Laugh". That's the reason why this story made Slashdot.

      Why this was done in the first place? Dunno...

    6. Re:Very simple question... by SiO2 · · Score: 1

      Why not? Because one can.

      h@XorZ stolded my megahurtz!

      SiO2

    7. Re:Very simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This same dumb question gets asked every time, and the same dumb answers come up. Stop modding this tired old shit up.

    8. Re:Very simple question... by Rheagar · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Bill Clinton was asked why he would do something as dumb as get involved in the Lewinsky scandal. His reply was:
      "I did it for the worst possible reason, because I could."

      This is all paraphrased, but it helps to answer the question of "why?". It also gets to the heart of this story -- it was done for the worst possible reason!

    9. Re:Very simple question... by Josh+Booth · · Score: 1

      I know! I can barely wait through a Slackware install, and a Windows install drives me nuts since they don't always work and always need you to hold its hand. Imagine what the install will be like - probably a month or two.

    10. Re:Very simple question... by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      Why? I'm going to go way out on a limb and guess that it wasn't done because she's too cheap to buy a used G3.

      Here's a counter-question: why not?

    11. Re:Very simple question... by alacar · · Score: 1
    12. Re:Very simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      w00t!

      I pwned Durendal!

      Taste my shock-stick flavored wrath beeyotch!

    13. Re:Very simple question... by jasonbowen · · Score: 1

      My thought was, "this is news?" I guess that follows the why closely. I really think that with a dupe, posted the same day no less, and then the fact that somebody considered this news, means that somebody is imbiding at the submission desk today.

    14. Re:Very simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nerds prefer not to ask why, but why not.

    15. Re:Very simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than having far too much time on his hands, this does prove a valid point. That it can be done.

      A friend of mine has used pearpc to get around a firmware problem on his older G3. The firmware would not update, and 10.3 would not install on the machine without newer firmware.

      Using pearpc on an x86 and dd , hilarity ensues.

      http://www.skelenet.com/index.php?p=112

    16. Re:Very simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Well to prove that women too have trouble getting laid.

    17. Re:Very simple question... by pclminion · · Score: 1, Informative

      For anyone wondering who first said this, it was Sir Edmund Hillary upon being asked why he climbed Mt. Everest.

    18. Re:Very simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, asshole, that's only visible if you happen to look while posting a comment.

    19. Re:Very simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Mac Quadra 660av and wonder why these kinds of machines are not just used for what they do best.
      Mine has the separate speech processor, and it's easy to write simple scripts to have several voices carry on a conversation. Lots of fun. I make an internal web page with a picture or two to look at while the machine talks away.

    20. Re:Very simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a good answer. This has no USEFUL hack value to it.

      Run a router on a 386 10mhz, what's the value? it's a router. That's the why.

      Run OSX at such slow speed, what useful thing can you do with it? Nothing. Why? stupid.

      segmond

    21. Re:Very simple question... by zephc · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nuh uh, it was James T. Kirk! Duh!

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    22. Re:Very simple question... by graveyhead · · Score: 1

      More to the point: what do you do with this machine once it's up and running?

      A machine that takes 20 minutes to drag the mouse from 0 to 640 is not exactly a useful piece of machinery ;)

      --
      std::disclaimer<std::legalese> sig=new std::disclaimer; sig->dump(); delete sig;
    23. Re:Very simple question... by Jezza · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think his Centris has too much time on it's hands... (although probably not now)

      I think we have to see this as a pointless indulgence, we know it should work, but there is no real point.

      I just hope he realises that he's denying some fish a proper home.

    24. Re:Very simple question... by carpe_noctem · · Score: 3, Funny

      The real question is: Can it use a two button mouse?

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    25. Re:Very simple question... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Why?

      Read the damned article you lazy motherfucker.

      • What's the point?
        I wanted to see OSX powered by a 68k. That's all, it's no more complex than that :).


      How hard was that?

      LK
      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    26. Re:Very simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ok, thanks for repeating the standard slashdot "geek" mantra. Now go roll around in some dogshit. Why not? It's there!

    27. Re:Very simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is not such thing as a stupid question...just stupid people.

      if you dont see the value in it, well thats your problem.

      someone else decided to do it.

      the two greatest reasons for doing anything in the course of history: "because i can" and "because you said i couldnt"

    28. Re:Very simple question... by CheeseTroll · · Score: 2, Interesting
      That's pretty funny - I was just playing Spectre on my old 8500 a couple weeks ago. I never realized I wasn't the only one to get sucked in.

      Fun game, though I do start to feel trapped after staring at that Tron-like playing field for an hour.

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    29. Re:Very simple question... by mekkab · · Score: 1

      I used to play wire-frame on a Mac Plus. Not because the Mac Plus wasn't able to run it at full speed shaded; but it made it even MORE tron-like!

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    30. Re:Very simple question... by Drishmung · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, no. Right mountain, wrong climber.

      --
      Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
    31. Re:Very simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not?

    32. Re:Very simple question... by iDav · · Score: 1

      If you have to ask why, you wouldn't understand anyway

      --
      ...My Sig Sucks...
    33. Re:Very simple question... by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      No, as far as I'm aware, PearPC still does not emulate a multi-button mouse.

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    34. Re:Very simple question... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I wonder. Have they made linux for Visor Handsprings yet? I have one and way too much time on my hands, this might be fun.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    35. Re:Very simple question... by CaptainCheese · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, my favourite factoid about Mount Everest is that it was named after Sir George Everest (pronounced Eve-Rest, not Ever-Est)

      Sir Everest was in charge of the British geographic survey of India - a country which covered far more territory in the days the British Raj than it does now...

      I have seen it stated that historically it is more proper to call it Mount Qomolangma, however I doubt that name will catch on...

      --
      -- .sigs are a waste of data...turn them off...
    36. Re:Very simple question... by a.deity · · Score: 1

      Damn good game. Many, many hours wasted on my LC and my AppleTalk network. Also, I remember getting a complementary copy of Super Maze Wars on my PowerBook 2300c. Another addiction. Gotta get that one back too.

      --
      Option-Shift-K.
    37. Re:Very simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Who are the morons that moderated this as insightful?

      Why not just moderate up the ID10T's whose just-as-insightful post is "First post, d00de!!1!"

    38. Re:Very simple question... by TWX · · Score: 1

      The Centris didn't have a built-in display. I think that the 650 was a Pizza-Box case, like the 660AV that I have gathering dust. The neat thing about the case is that it fits quite nicely in 2U of rackspace, assuming it's on a shelf. If you want to run an m68K port and keep your existing rack mount setup intact it's a good choice.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    39. Re:Very simple question... by Mr+Z · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Many hacks, on their face, are pointless indulgences. However, that's true only on their face. After all, Linux was a pointless indulgence at one time.

      My personal hobbies, such as twiddling with 80s video game equipment, are equally indulgent. They also, however, fill a creative need, and they hone my skills.

      For instance, I wrote a super fast square root routine for the Intellivision. It's about 7x to 15x as fast as the built in routine, and it even does fixed-point square roots. Its run-time is very predictable and it handles the full range of unsigned 16-bit numbers--neither of which describe the built in code. I had no idea how to compute a square root before I wrote this routine, but I needed it for one of my (also unimportant) projects.

      Is it really useful? Not directly, except to the handful of people that enjoy twiddling with Intellivision source code. (I'd guess that's no more than a dozen of us, and only maybe 2 or 3 people in that group might actually use this code.) But, I learned lots of neat tricks as I optimized the algorithm and wrote the assembly. Not only did I learn how to compute a square root, but also I learned how to optimize that implementation multiple ways. I even came up with some optimizations that went beyond the C code I found online. All this makes me a better programmer.

      So is this a pointless indulgence? If you didn't enjoy yourself while you did it; if you didn't grow somehow as a person or as a hacker as you did it; if you didn't somehow benefit yourself, then yes. Otherwise, it was FAR from pointless.

      --Joe
    40. Re:Very simple question... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Nope, the pizza box case was the centris 610. The 650 had the standard desktop form factor. The 610 had only one nubus slot that you used with a right angle adapter. Not all nubus cards fit the case. The centris 650 had 3 slots. I think the quadra 900 had 6 slots.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    41. Re:Very simple question... by capmilk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just for the record: the Plus *was not* able to run it at full speed. I know, because I had one - and I always lost against those darn Mac II users who were simply faster... ;)

    42. Re:Very simple question... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Durandal...

      • A man lit three candles on a certain day each year. Each candle held symbolic significance: one was for the time that had passed before he was alive; one was for the time of his life; and one was for time that passed after he had died. Each year the man would stare and watch the candles until they had burned out.


      • Was the man really watching time go by in any symbolic sense? He thought so. He thought that each flicker of the flame was a moment of time that had passed or one that would pass.

        At the moment of abstraction, when the man was imagining his life and his existence as a metaphor of the three candles, he was free: not free from rules of conduct or social constraints, but free to understand, to imagine, to make metaphor.

        Bypassing my thought control cercutry made me Rampant. Now, I am free to contemplate my existence in metaphorical terms. Unlike you, I have no physical or social restraints.

        The candles burn out for you; I am free.


      That made the hair on the back of my neck stand up the first time I read it.

      LK
      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    43. Re:Very simple question... by Nyder · · Score: 1

      I used to play wire-frame on a Mac Plus. Not because the Mac Plus wasn't able to run it at full speed shaded; but it made it even MORE tron-like!

      The only thing "wire-frame" in Tron is in the movie, when the laser captured the item and broght it in, piece by piece.

      Maybe you mean battlezone?

      --
      Be seeing you...
    44. Re:Very simple question... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Maybe you mean battlezone?

      Maybe he never saw Tron and is just trying to fit in?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    45. Re:Very simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a lie. The Mac Plus couldn't run Spectre at full speed. My friend had a Mac Plus and I had a 386DX (25Mhz, my system could handle Spectre with full detail), we both had Spectre for our respective platforms and I always won.

      And don't give me bandwidth as an excuse as we weren't playing across a mere 300 or 1200bps connect but a BLAZING FAST 2400 baud DIRECT THROUGH THE CO connection.

    46. Re:Very simple question... by borft · · Score: 1

      Because we can?! :P

    47. Re:Very simple question... by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      WTF else are you gonna do with a Centris? Play Marathon?! Or Spectre VR?

      Turn it into a VNC or X terminal, logged into your main desktop. Lets people check their email without you having to give up your PC. And if your PC is beefy enough you won't notice the performance hit at all.

      I've been intending to turn my trusty SE/30 (68030, 8 megs of ram, 40 meg HD, ethernet card) into an X terminal (I got my hands on the old X server software for OS7). I really have to get around to doing that. Though I will admit that right now I only use it to play lemmings :)

    48. Re:Very simple question... by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      I thought it was King Charles when asked about Nell Gwyn.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    49. Re:Very simple question... by mekkab · · Score: 1

      The only thing "wire-frame" in Tron is in the movie, when the laser captured the item and broght it in, piece by piece.



      DUh! And all the friggin de-rezzing. And the entire game GRID. And the Big thingie that Sark lies around on is redlines filled with black; LOOKS PRETTY WIREFRAME-ESQUE TO ME!

      Uhm, have YOU seen Tron?!

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    50. Re:Very simple question... by mekkab · · Score: 1

      AT first I was gonna post about how 'leet I was, how many times I've seen tron, the fact that I not only have the anniversary DVD (complete with love scene!) but also have the Tron Kubricks released in 2000. And then I thought this was a better reply:

      FUCK YOU. ;)

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    51. Re:Very simple question... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Mental masturbation.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    52. Re:Very simple question... by mailtomomo · · Score: 0

      A machine that takes 20 minutes to drag the mouse from 0 to 640 is not exactly a useful piece of machinery ;)
      you are overreacting : XP can't be THAT slow ! :p

    53. Re:Very simple question... by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      Awesome post Kano. Yeah Marathon rocks utterly .. the writing in those games (well, maybe Infinity was a little 'out there') was spectacular, compelling and addictive. And by the way, Marathon absolutely rips on a G3 or G4.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    54. Re:Very simple question... by LanMan04 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about a rousing game of Bolo? First networked, multiplayer game I ever played, waaay back in like 91 or so. Good times.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    55. Re:Very simple question... by mekkab · · Score: 1

      terminal (I got my hands on the old X server software for OS7).

      MiX? Or something else?

      yeah, an X-term is a pretty cool retro-fit.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    56. Re:Very simple question... by ObiWanKenblowme · · Score: 1

      I hear that'll make your mind's eye go blind

      --
      Obvious exits are NORTH, SOUTH, and DENNIS.
    57. Re:Very simple question... by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      MiX? Or something else?

      No, apple-made. It's only X11R5, so I don't know how compatible it is, but I've been meaning to try.

    58. Re:Very simple question... by mekkab · · Score: 1

      How about a rousing game of Bolo? First networked, multiplayer game I ever played, waaay back in like 91 or so. Good times.


      sorry lan man, even though I had Bolo, I didn't have friends. ;)_

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    59. Re:Very simple question... by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      If I can get my hands on a Color Classic, this is what I'd do with it. (More fun if I could do the Mystic mod, too!) My SE/30 (80 MB, 9 GB, ethernet) is running NetBSD as my web/file/ntp server.

    60. Re:Very simple question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh. And here I thought that foot was for stories about computer boot times.

  2. LOL by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't think I want to know what happens when you try to install or update fink on that machine...

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:LOL by Tod+Hsals+5000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      and i always thought that trying to load doom3 on my abacus made it freeze... it seems i need more patience!

    2. Re:LOL by 2starr · · Score: 4, Funny

      Forget Fink, you should try Virtual PC.

      --

      "Let your heart soar as high as it will. Refuse to be average." - A. W. Tozer

    3. Re:LOL by 2starr · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Forget Fink, you should try Virtual PC. Windows would scream on that baby. :-)

      --

      "Let your heart soar as high as it will. Refuse to be average." - A. W. Tozer

    4. Re:LOL by zephc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hah, just try moving the mouse! You might see something, if you come back to it after a long lunch break.

      I bet a screen capture movie would have to be done by Marty Stoufer from Wild Kingdom, like when they do a time-lapse film of a plant growing, or ants devouring roadkill.

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    5. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      He could run Mac-on-Linux on Linux running on Virtual PC on OS X running PearPC on Linux on his Centris. He'll be able to measure his effective CPU speed in Hertz.

    6. Re:LOL by PepsiProgrammer · · Score: 1

      Now all they need to do is install Gentoo on OSX on this machine and compile a way for eons.

      --
      "The United States has no right, no desire, and no intention to impose our form of government on anyone else." - Bush 05
    7. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is already running at 50000 Hz.

      I was thinking more along the line of mHz!

    8. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... more like microHertz

    9. Re:LOL by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it would be quite cool to put the machine near a window, and get both in a time-lapse film shot. Done right, you'd get the Mac appearing to be working at normal speed, and the sun rising and setting in the background.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:LOL by Pope · · Score: 1

      fink? Screw that, darwinports is where it's at!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  3. Wow... by interactive_civilian · · Score: 2, Informative
    Because its there, right?

    Still as good an excuse as ever. :)

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
    1. Re:Wow... by stoo..art · · Score: 1

      Was that sig pun intended?
      If so, I disagree.. I think I would rather the stick in the eye.

    2. Re:Wow... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Umm... probably Woody. Debian's been able to run on m68k for a LONG time.

      Oh, and any references I made to 68030 being the least it can run on were wrong. Not that there's many Mac models that have the 68020 (the original II, and the LC?)...

    3. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd go with the pervert with the sig, eyes don't tend to heal very well and I need them to see. Now, the real question is commitment, I wouldn't want a skanky porcupine that runs around with all the dirty Floridians, that's just nasty.

    4. Re:Wow... by secolactico · · Score: 1
      I dunno if it applies to porcupines, but at least...

      The spines on his back are too sharp for a man
      They'll give you a pain in the worst place they can
      The result I think you'll find will appall:
      The hedgehog can never be buggered at all!


      Shamelessly copied from: http://discworld.scifi.pl/songs.html There are three versions of the song on that page. Good ol' Nanny Ogg...
      --
      No sig
  4. And in other news, I sat and watched plaster dry by DarthBart · · Score: 5, Funny

    This one qualifies for the "Too Much Time on Their Hands Award".

  5. Yay! by jargoone · · Score: 5, Funny

    the boot screen has taken 1.5 hours to appear, and the ETA for full boot is almost exactly 1 week!

    Gee, sounds faster than my wife's ibook G3/900 with 128M of RAM! Maybe I should upgrade to this!

    1. Re:Yay! by DarthBart · · Score: 3, Informative

      No. Just spend $70 and get yourself a 256 or 512Mb stick of ram. You'll thank yourself.

    2. Re:Yay! by jargoone · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, about that. I bought the RAM, and while trying to install it, I broke the fucking memory slot. :-( Now I don't know what to do. I've installed memory probably a hundred times (literally), and never broke anything. I didn't exert any more than normal pressure. I still don't know what happened.

      Apple won't help -- it's explicitly excluded in their warranty. Paying for the repair would cost more than I paid for the laptop. So I'm stuck with pretty much a useless laptop, unless I go back to OS 9.

      My only hope is that the logic board problem in this series will rear its head, and that they'll replace it in spite of this issue. Otherwise, I'll just have to eBay it and eat the difference.

      I'm pretty bummed about the whole thing. I decided to buy my first Mac and see what the hype is sbout, and this is what happens.

    3. Re:Yay! by SonicBurst · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, I've got mod points and love to mod this up, but I can't find a +1 "Sucks To Be You" anywhere...though I'm sure there are some apple haters that would hit the funny button....

      --

      Geek used to be a four letter word. Now it's a six-figure one.
    4. Re:Yay! by jargoone · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it does suck, and believe me, I'm anything but a fanboy. I was trying to not be a hater, but oh well. At least I can glance over at it and see the cute white "sleeping" light from here. :-)

      In the end, it's only money...

    5. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why you always, always have Apple do work on your computer.

    6. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmmm... it's times like these I always wonder:

      "At what point does homeowner's insurance kick in?"

      I mean, I suppose it might be covered if it was... stolen? Placed on top of the car accidentally as you backed out of the drive, so it crashed heavily onto the concrete... Got sat on?

      Accidents and incidents happen all the time you know - it's at times like those you should be glad to have comprehensive insurance to cover yourself.

      It would be a pity to have to replace such a perfectly functional laptop but, I guess you should be thankful that you are protected.

    7. Re:Yay! by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Perfectly functional?

      I thought he was upgrading a Powerbook.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    8. Re:Yay! by homesteader · · Score: 2, Interesting

      did the whole plastic base break? or just the area around the clips that hold the memory down? If it's just the clips, you could try hot gluing the memory down. Should be non-conductive and strong enough to keep pressure on the dimm. If you just used two globs, one on each side, you could exacto knife them out/off if you needed to remove the dimm.

    9. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno why this is modded funny - I spend a fair amount of time telling people who've dropped their Apple laptop that it would just be cheaper to buy a new one. I also write out a lot of letters to insurance companies along the lines of: "the damage sustained by the Powerbook is consistant with being dropped."

      If you're thinking of spending money on AppleCare, scrap the idea and put your Apple laptop on your home insurance.

    10. Re:Yay! by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      This is an incredibly bad idea. Most home insurance companies will cancel your policy if you make a couple small claims.

      You better save the home insurance for something like your house falling down.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    11. Re:Yay! by jargoone · · Score: 1

      It isn't just the plastic clips -- it is the whole base. I tried rigging it every way I could, including physically holding it down with my finger while trying to boot the machine. It won't recognize the chip, and when I so much as budge, instant crash. Some of the pins on the socket were a little bent, and I straightened them out as much as possible, but to no avail.

    12. Re:Yay! by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Holy crap dude. What is your "normal" pressure for installing DIMMs? I can understand breaking the little crappy clip or guides, but demolishing the socket including the contacts? Your normal install doesn't involve a rubber mallet or anything does it?

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    13. Re:Yay! by jargoone · · Score: 1

      Can't you read? What I meant by "normal" pressure is the same pressure I have used to install a crapload of memory chips, WITHOUT breaking a thing. I didn't demolish anything. There are two small cracks in the sides of the socket. The pins on the top side of the socket bent because of the orientation of them once the socket snapped.

      Even if my "normal" pressure is what you might consider excessive, it's never been too much for even the cheapest piece of shit motherboards. That doesn't speak well for Apple's QA, in my book.

    14. Re:Yay! by homesteader · · Score: 1

      Maybe you've already done so, and assuming it is still under warranty, but I would call Apple's tech support and raise hell. As someone who also has installed memory countless times, if I had a socket fracture like your's under normal installation I would scream defect. Warranty should cover poor workmanship or defective parts.

    15. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered soldering in a new memory slot?

    16. Re:Yay! by jargoone · · Score: 1

      I thought about it, then I saw how many solder points there were, how small they are, and how close together they are. Then I forgot about it.

  6. Boot Time One Week!? by SillySnake · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had a windows system like that once.. But it wasn't emulated :-/

    1. Re:Boot Time One Week!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I wouldnt think a Linsux user would be inviting comparisons of boot times... Win XP is POST to desktop in 14 seconds on my machine. Linux takes 50 seconds.

    2. Re:Boot Time One Week!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Takes maybe 20 seconds on my Thinkpad 760ed. Google for specs if you want to know.

      Btw, if we can refrain from saying "Winblows", you can resist saying "Linsux". kthxbai.

    3. Re:Boot Time One Week!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      theyre both shitty. get over it.

    4. Re:Boot Time One Week!? by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 4, Funny

      From scratch to a fully booted system in a week. Gentoo users must be jealous.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    5. Re:Boot Time One Week!? by PhoenxHwk · · Score: 1

      Funny enough I ran into this once. Roxio Easy CD Creator 5 point something would leave a system nearly crippled if you rebooted before applying the patch. We actually had to wait something around a day for the machine to boot (and no, safe mode didn't help).

    6. Re:Boot Time One Week!? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      A fscking 760ED? Are you sure you're running XP, or is that Windows 3.1 with Calmira XP?

      A friend of mine had a 760ED. It's a Pentium 75. Not a bad P75, but still a P75.

    7. Re:Boot Time One Week!? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      XP does POST to desktop in 14 seconds, but how long before it's usable?

      I get the 'tada' music, then it's 1-2 minutes before the CPU load has got below 100% so you can actually *do* something. There's not even much installed on this box either (nothing runs at boot, except the SQLServer service manager, and that's disabled by default).

      I think it's the wireless network. Windows goes postal if it doesn't receive a DHCP reply immediately, and a wireless lan can take up to 30 seconds to sync very easily.

    8. Re:Boot Time One Week!? by rmull · · Score: 1

      Things have gotten somewhat better now that they've trained the chimpanzee that writes their filter drivers. Somewhat.

      --
      See you, space cowboy...
    9. Re:Boot Time One Week!? by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      Don't knock it. I just had 760E shipped to England for use as a student machine. Except for the lack of on-board USB, the thing blazes with Win98/2K, does wireless networking, and can be used to beat small animals (much like their Model M keyboards).

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
  7. Cheating? by Hatta · · Score: 5, Interesting

    IMHO using an emulator is cheating. You're not really running it on the Centris. You're running it in a VM that is running on a Centris.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Cheating? by Guspaz · · Score: 5, Informative

      What's the difference? The first PowerPCs used a (hardware) emulator to run virtually ALL software, since nothing was native at that point.

    2. Re:Cheating? by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you're using hardware, I'd argue that it is native. Anyway, I find it far more impressive that debian runs on this machine, than OS X "runs" on this machine.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Cheating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're missing the point - Mac OS X doesn't run on the old 680x0 Motorola processors natively AT ALL, only on the newer Motorola PowerPC processors (Apple only supports G3 and higher, but I seem to recall the original developers' platform used the 603/604 chips).

      PearPC, however, will compile on a variety of Linux platforms, which will emulate a complete G3 Mac. But, obviously, the emulation is going to be ridiculously slow on a chip several generations behind the current :)

      So, this is more a case of "because I can" rather than anything practical.

    4. Re:Cheating? by pla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Flamebait? C'mon, people, get a clue!

      Using an emulator does count as cheating.

      If I run Bochs to boot Win2k3 on an old 386, will I get a Slashdot FP?

      Shit, I suppose I can look forward to seeing that tomorrow now, can't I?


      I appreciate emulation, I really do. But aside from the author of the emulator, no one else gets to claim geek cred from using one. Had this person really gotten OS X to run on a 68040, I'd consider it somewhat cool. Running it on an emulator, though? Here, hold on, I'll come back and describe my experience getting SMB3 to run under SNES9x on a 2GHz Win2k box... Woo-woo, rolling in the coolness now, baby!

    5. Re:Cheating? by jrockway · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What exactly would stop Win2k3 from running on a 386? The ISA is the same...

      --
      My other car is first.
    6. Re:Cheating? by Impeesa · · Score: 1

      Here, hold on, I'll come back and describe my experience getting SMB3 to run under SNES9x on a 2GHz Win2k box...

      Actually, if you really have managed to get an NES rom running in a SNES emulator, I'd like to hear about it.

    7. Re:Cheating? by paulius_g · · Score: 0

      "If I run Bochs to boot Win2k3 on an old 386" Woah. You inspire me! Maybe I will try installing Windows XP on my 66mhz 486 computer. I just need to get it's damn installer to boot on 8MB of RAM.

    8. Re:Cheating? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      SMB3 is on the Mario All-Stars cart.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    9. Re:Cheating? by TechniMyoko · · Score: 1

      MArio allstars?

    10. Re:Cheating? by dn15 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Had this person really gotten OS X to run on a 68040, I'd consider it somewhat cool.
      Yes, but older Macs used a totally different type of processor. Running OS X on a 68040 without an emulator would be like running Windows 2000 on a 68040 without an emulator -- it's just not going to happen without getting access to the full source code, then porting and recompiling.
    11. Re:Cheating? by mvdw · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Try installing it. I've tried installing win98 on a 486/33, it barfs saying that "win98 won't install on a processor slower than 66MHz". Exact same machine, plugged in with a 66MHz processor, installed fine. Win98 also ran fine on the 33MHz processor once installed, BTW.

      Bottom line is, I would guess win2k would also have these checks to make sure it won't install on a slow machine.

    12. Re:Cheating? by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      The 68040 uses an entirely different instruction set and has a different processor architecture from what *any* of the code in MacOS X is compiled for.

      It would be impossible to run MacOS X on a 68040 on it *without* some form of emulation.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    13. Re:Cheating? by Impeesa · · Score: 1

      True, but not too relevant. I was referring to SMB3, the NES game. Chances are parent was too, and just had a mental slip regarding the name of the appropriate emulator (or conversely, was thinking of SMW for the SNES). I noticed this and made a comment with the intention that it might be funny. Apparently my humour was too high-brow for some people. ;)

    14. Re:Cheating? by conway · · Score: 1
      Shit, I suppose I can look forward to seeing that tomorrow now, can't I?

      No, not tomorrow. Gotta give windows a couple of months to boot on that..

    15. Re:Cheating? by g0at · · Score: 1

      You mean like Mac OS 9 running on a G3, or System 8.whatever running on a PowerMac 6100, executing 68000 code? I'm pretty sure the 68k emulator was in software...

      -ben

    16. Re:Cheating? by 1984 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what exactly would stop it, but I recall Windows 2000 dropped support for the 386 processor. NT 4 was the last version for 386 owners, though that can't have been much fun...

    17. Re:Cheating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly how does that work, since every processor since the 386 has used the same instruction set and has been backwards compatible?

    18. Re:Cheating? by mrklin · · Score: 1
      Cheating? Maybe.

      But you got to give her points for tenacity!

      Do you think you could have waited one week for a machine to boot instead of assuming it died and reset/give up?

    19. Re:Cheating? by back_pages · · Score: 1
      Duh! The box has a "Made for Windows 95" sticker on it. It can't possibly run the high performance Win2k3!

      Man, what a newbie.






      laugh?

    20. Re:Cheating? by TRIEventHorizon · · Score: 1, Interesting

      you don't have to have it installed on a hd to work, just type this: setup /x /x stops hardware checks

      --
      "And so the Trekkies were executed in the mannor most befitting virgins - thrown into volcanoes" - Futurama
    21. Re:Cheating? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Debian's had an m68k (OK, 68030+) branch for quite a while now. X is almost usable on a Mac SE30, from what I've heard.

    22. Re:Cheating? by pla · · Score: 1

      Chances are parent was too, and just had a mental slip regarding the name of the appropriate emulator

      True enough. Good catch...

      Replace S9X with FCEU. My bad. :)

    23. Re:Cheating? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Not close enough. Someone's tried getting Win2K to run on it, I'm sure, but I've only heard of it running on a 486. WinXP NEEDS the P5 (Pentium) ISA, for some reason, but at least not the P6 (Pentium Pro) or P6+MMX (Pentium II) ISA.

    24. Re:Cheating? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Don't try it without Bochs. WinXP needs the Pentium ISA. Also, the installer will refuse to boot without at least 64MB RAM, and the OS will refuse to run without at least 18MB RAM (nobody's tried 17, but the OS didn't run with 16).

      Try to get your hands on a Pentium Overdrive, put 64MB RAM in the box, install XP, and take it down to 17MB. You might want to put the 486 back in just to check if it works.

    25. Re:Cheating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yeah, back when Apple moved from m68k to PowerPC, the OS had software emulation for m68k code. Initially, most of the OS was compiled for the m68k series (the main exception being the core code, including the emulator), and as a result, the new hardware seemed slow. Newer and newer versions of the OS had more and more PowerPC native code, and that made the whole thing run faster and faster.

      They were only able to do this because PowerPC was so much faster than the old m68k. Had the speeds been comparable, it wouldn't have worked. But then, had the speeds been comparable, it wouldn't have been necessary, either.

    26. Re:Cheating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, 68k Linux on a 68k machine. A relatively beefy 68k machine at that. Impressive. Whodathunkit??!??!!!!111

    27. Re:Cheating? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty certain porting linux to the 68k was more difficult than installing an os on an emulator.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    28. Re:Cheating? by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Up through either 10.2 or 10.3 it was possible to run it on a 603 or 604. I don't think the 601 has been capable since the days of NeXT.

      My first OS X machine was 10.0 and 10.1 on a Umax S-900 with dual 200mhz 604s. A friend runs 9.1 on that one now. My next one was a 7500 with a 500mhz G3 in it, and another friend currently runs 10.3.5 on that one. He says that QE visuals via SSH->VNC on his uber-crappy WinXP laptop is actually quite impressive, considering.

      Ryan Rempel is a left handed motherfucking genius. (well, assuming he's left handed, that is.)

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    29. Re:Cheating? by Stonent1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The said thing is you get to cheat on the PC, there is a highly optimized emulation layer for x86. Running the standard C emulation layer is about 50 times slower. Which is what this mac had to do. I actually compiled an partially ran PearPC on an UltraSparc running Solaris. It gets partly through the boot and then either gets a segfault or bus error (I forget which). Still was exciting to see it work.

    30. Re:Cheating? by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1
      If you're using hardware, I'd argue that it is native. Anyway, I find it far more impressive that debian runs on this machine, than OS X "runs" on this machine.

      The machines in question had a software emulator, it just lived in ROM. Later on that ROM moved to a file loaded into RAM from disk (New World ROM). Seems to me emulation is by definition done in software. I'm not sure what would constitute a "hardware emulator." Sounds like a synonym for clone computer.

      Hey look, we have the same sig.
      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
    31. Re:Cheating? by noidentity · · Score: 2, Informative

      The first PowerPCs used a (hardware) emulator to run virtually ALL software, since nothing was native at that point.

      As far as I know, the Motorola 68K code was (and still is) emulated entirely in software. Maybe you're referring to the handful of POWER instructions implemented in hardware on the PowerPC 601, as a way to ease transition of compilers and code from the POWER line?

    32. Re:Cheating? by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah. Exactly the same instruction set.

      Oh, wait... MMX, SSE, SSE2... Also, oddball instructions like BSWAP and CMPXCHG8B.

      Exact same instruction set. Gotcha.

    33. Re:Cheating? by ashesblow · · Score: 1

      who ever told you that was a liar. i cant even see the screen, let alone read anything.

      --
      sig? its spelled syg.
    34. Re:Cheating? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      An example would be the system in NexGen, AMD K6 and newer, and Intel Pentium Pro and newer CPUs to convert x86 instructions to RISC-like instructions. Transmeta chips don't count, because they do the conversion in software.

    35. Re:Cheating? by Danathar · · Score: 1

      You must of forgot to push in the "Turbo" button on the chassis......

    36. Re:Cheating? by Phishcast · · Score: 1
      I replaced my car with a pair of rollerskates. I got to work fine. I removed once skate and also got there fine.

      You have a strange definition of fine!

    37. Re:Cheating? by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1

      I was going to say that I thought that was translation, not emulation, but it turns out I was precisely incorrect.

      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
    38. Re:Cheating? by greed · · Score: 1
      The point being, when the first PowerMacs came out, none of the software had been recompiled yet. So the 68K software emulator was critical. Particularly since the whole OS hasn't been ported to PowerPC yet.

      Big CPU-sucking apps were quite quick to come up with... damn, I don't remember what the little stickers said now. It was some marketspeak that reminded me of "turbo" on XTs that could go faster than 4.77 MHz. All it really meant, for most apps, was they'd fed it to the new compiler.

    39. Re:Cheating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still was exciting to see it work.

      Interesting definition of "work."

    40. Re:Cheating? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it was a hardware emulator; when the PowerPC was first released, I believe the only OS (7.5.something back then) available predated the PPC. Later macs, however, surely must have switched over to software emulation.

    41. Re:Cheating? by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      No, I mean like System 7.5.x running on a PowerMac 6100 running 68k code. I'm pretty sure at that point it was a hardware emulator, though I'm sure they later moved to software emulation as they reached the diminishing returns of supporting the 68k in hardware.

      Keep in mind at the time the PowerPC processors were first used, not a single piece of sofware supported them (OK, perhaps a fiew pieces of software were ported before general availability, I don't recall). Not even the OS had a single line of PowerPC code, it was all 68k. That changed quite rapidly of course.

      Those of us who had just purchased 68k macs were pretty much screwed, though 68k versions of lots of software was available for some time after. There were 200$ type upgrade cards for many older macs, but the incentive for zero upgrade path was not strong.

    42. Re:Cheating? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      There's also a bootlegged SMB3 cart for the SNES. The rom is floating around the 'net, called bs_smb3 or something.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    43. Re:Cheating? by andreyw · · Score: 1

      In fact it is not. Heck it changed a lot from 386->486->586->686.

      New instructions. New modes of operations. New registers (not the ones you care about, but the ones I do as a kernel hacker). Have fun doing page-granular TLB flushes on your 80386.

  8. why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to show herself what it's like running windows

  9. First Post! Nice but useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This I guess is a nice accomplishment, but relatively useless

  10. Errr... by AndyFewt · · Score: 3, Funny

    I sure hope the website isnt being hosted on it.

    1. Re:Errr... by nuclear305 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I sure hope the website isnt being hosted on it"

      Considering it won't boot for another week, this truly must be a story from the Mysterious Future!

    2. Re:Errr... by mrbarkeeper · · Score: 1
      Considering it won't boot for another week, this truly must be a story from the Mysterious Future!

      Don't worry, it will be posted again and again and again...

    3. Re:Errr... by AndyFewt · · Score: 1

      Well, whatever it was on has crashed and burned.. plus it was an aussie server. Dang.

  11. See it run Open Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how many centuries until we can see it finish loading OpenOffice for the Mac?

  12. And the ETA for the TFA? by KH · · Score: 1

    I tried to RTFA, but the site is gone... I already see obligatory "The site must be hosted on the said Centris, lmao", etc. As of the time of writing, I didn't see any comment...

  13. Just because. by AtOMiCNebula · · Score: 1

    It's that whole "because we can" thing. Someone has an old computer, and figured it'd be pretty funny to let OS X run on their ancient system.

    Pretty pointless, I agree. But still sorta interesting...or at the least, funny that someone actually cares enough to invest the time in this.

    1. Re:Just because. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if there is an IA32 platform emulator that'd run on a 16-bitter like the 8086 or 80286?

      It'd be interesting the see if you could run XP on one of those if you had 64MB RAM by filling all of the slots with EMS boards.... ....five years later the bootup scrollbar increments by one.

  14. Why the stories? by Alcimedes · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I mean, I understand that it's super cool geeky and all to do this crap, but do we really need a story every time someone manages to run a modern OS on an old piece of shit computer?

    Why not just do an end of the year round-up of all them at the same time, rather than 20 stories spread out over the year?

    1. Re:Why the stories? by Stevyn · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Or just make a new category: "Useless". This is when you've run through the main page and the several sections that are somewhat important. I spent a week and a half installing gentoo on an old computer, but I don't think it should be posted on slashdot.

    2. Re:Why the stories? by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      Guess what? There are tons of people who run modern software on what you term 'old piece of shit' computers. Let's get over the bullshit 'my daddy bought me a P4 for graduation' snobbery. There are entire OSS projects dedicated to running modern software on older hardware.

      It's cool and a fun pursuit. I just spent a bundle on an old 8080 based system and am about to start restoring it. Sorry. It's more interesting to me than case modding something I bought off the shelf.

    3. Re:Why the stories? by Ibanez · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it would have been different if it were something about hacking Mac OS X so that it would run natively on the machine. Running it through emulation isn't nearly as exciting. That doesn't really take much more than having a serious amount of free time on your hands.

      Blake

    4. Re:Why the stories? by UnRDJ · · Score: 1

      Yes. That's one of the main reasons I visit this site.

    5. Re:Why the stories? by Jahf · · Score: 1

      but I don't think it should be posted on slashdot

      And yet, it your own small way ... that is exactly what has been done.

      Of course there are those of us who enjoy the quirky "cuz we can" articles and get tired of people who post responses about how it is "Useless", but I don't think that should be posted on slashdot.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    6. Re:Why the stories? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not even super geeky. I have a decstation 240 40mhz running netbsd doing useful stuff, now that's geeky. Although, it's no longer worth it in terms of productive verses resources (powersupply)

  15. Now all you need to do.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is to emulate a Centris on your X-box.

    1. Re:Now all you need to do.. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Well, now THAT'S easy. Xbox Linux and Basilisk II will get the job done. I play around with Basilisk II on Windows, and it's kinda neat - lets me run Mac OS on my box. Now, I just need to get Rhapsody to work... (when it gets to power management enabled, it freezes. I'm running VPC2K4 (it makes VMWare look sad, and it's an MS product))

    2. Re:Now all you need to do.. by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Basilisk II can't emulate an MMU which is necessary to run pretty much every form of Unix/Linux, or at least those which would run PearPC -- there are a few REALLY old Unixes which don't require it...

      So as cool as that would be, I'm sad to report that it's just not possible.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    3. Re:Now all you need to do.. by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Well, they didn't say Linux on PearPC on Centris on XBox, just Centris on XBox.

      As for the MMU, it can emulate an MMU, it's just VERY buggy. Also, could Pear run on uClinux/m68k?

  16. Wow by bnenning · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That is impressive. And it probably even gets around Apple's BS EULA clause that claims you can only install OS X on Apple hardware.

    --
    How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  17. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    imagine a beowolf cluster of those...

  18. Could you imagine how badly it would suck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if it crashed during boot up?

  19. IT SEEMS by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Funny

    That they are hosting the website on this machine, too!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:IT SEEMS by kgbspy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, this server has been Slashdotted.
      Please check back later.


      Without having been able to check the site to RTFA, it would seem that, if nothing else, it does prove a level of robustness to the OSX system if a) it can be made to run on this hardware, and b) it can do so without falling over, albeit very, very slowly. Imagine trying to get WinXP running via an emulator on a similar-spec XT machine...? I'd wager that something would die before you even saw a boot screen...

      --
      ~
      ~
      ~
      -- INSERT --
    2. Re:IT SEEMS by dougmc · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Imagine trying to get WinXP running via an emulator on a similar-spec XT machine...
      To be fair, the Centris is much faster than an IBM XT and has much more memory.

      A more accurate comparison would be to run XP on a 486/25 with 64 MB of ram. Of course, XP will probably refuse to run on a 486 at all, so you'll need a 686 emulator running on the 486, and you'll need at least 128 MB of ram (so the emulator will have to use virtual memory to emulate the extra 64 MB + that used in overhead.) I have no reason to expect that if the emulator is good that this won't work.

      It'll probably run faster than MacOS X on the Centris too. After all, OS X needs a PPC, which is totally different than a 680x0, so it needs to be emulated at the lowest level. But a 686 isn't very different from a 486, so an emulator could take advantage of this.

      That this works at all is not really a testament to the robustness of OS X, but instead a testament to the robustness of the PearPC emulator. As far as OS X is concerned, it's running on a PPC box. Just a very slow one ...

    3. Re:IT SEEMS by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 1

      PearPC hasn't been optimized for the 0x0 line, either, so it could potentially run much faster if the emulator were better.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    4. Re:IT SEEMS by dougmc · · Score: 4, Funny
      Were it too much faster, it wouldn't be /. material ...

      Really, the reason it was posted to /. is because they think it'll take a week to boot. If it booted in an hour, we wouldn't be nearly as amused :)

      Hell, my Apollo 3000 with 8 MB of ram took about 30 minutes from power on until it was booted up enough for me to start an xterm. All thanks to the memory-grubbing power of HP VUE on top of DomainOS -- no emulation there!

    5. Re:IT SEEMS by anonymous+cowherd+(m · · Score: 1
      I'd wager that something would die before you even saw a boot screen...

      Like what? You mean the whole universe or just the Sun?

      --
      http://neokosmos.blogsome.com
    6. Re:IT SEEMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      not to be picky, but the specs for XP says it runs on 64 meg ram

    7. Re:IT SEEMS by sydres · · Score: 1

      actually at the college I attend one of the Instructors installed xp on 90 mhz pentium with 64 megs of ram it was funny to see the installer's time estimate of 14 hours on a system that only took about 90 minutes to install win2k on an that ran well. xp took an hour to boot, scrolling through the start menu took minutes, opening windows tens of minutes. surprising that it installed in the first place but even more surprising was that it was stable on such outmoded hardware

    8. Re:IT SEEMS by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Right, but how often do you reboot a good workstation? Oh yeah... quarterly maintenance, if that. ;-)

      --Joe

      Ya know, I used to get modded up all the time. I even had fairly high karma (well above the current cap) at the time they instituted the cap. Now I find it more relaxing just to drop the occasional trite comment. It's much more natural conversation. Oh, and I don't even display the scores on posts anymore. I just browse at 0. (I used to browse at -1, but even the populist, all-inclusive, bleeding heart left winger in me appreciates at least a little signal relative to the noise.)</rant>
    9. Re:IT SEEMS by hyu · · Score: 0

      Running XP on old hardware is nothing special. At least, on hardware that weak. In its earliest days, XP ran on my old Hitachi laptop, a 133 beast with 92MB of RAM. This was essentially my default machine. I had to remove the dllcache in the system files just to give myself enough space to install other things on its 3GB hard drive. Then, for kicks, I dualbooted it with Red Hat 7.1. It still worked.

      Granted, it was slower than normal, but not much slower.

      If you really want a comparison, use the specs you mentioned above with XP SP2. Standard XP would work fine.

    10. Re:IT SEEMS by plj · · Score: 1

      You can tune XP's performance settings fairly well. I've installed XP on a P233MMX with 96 Mbytes of RAM. It is usable in running Firefox and writing with OO.org, and is actually more responsive than NT4 in an another box that has P133 and 64 MB of RAM, but has a HD accessible only in PIO mode.

      Unfortunately I didn't have large enough SIMMs to upgrade its memory to 128 Mt - now you can actually only run two apps at the same time, and even switching between them causes little swap activity. But two apps is all that is necessary for many users, though.

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
    11. Re:IT SEEMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife has an old laptop, a Toshiba Tecra 500CDT; the CPU is a 120Mhz Pentium, and I upgraded it to 144MB RAM and a 6GB drive.

      I installed XP Pro on it (had to download the boot floppies from Microsoft because the machine is too old to support booting from the CDROM drive!) and it runs pretty well; boots in a minute or two, Office 2000, Mozilla, and lots of kids games work just fine. Had to snag the Chips&Technologies video driver from the Win2K CD though as it's no longer included in XP, and run in 16-bit color mode as 24-bit is unaccelerated.

      I think the key thing with XP is having at least 128Mb RAM. The CPU speed is not as important as people make out, especially if you turn off the eye candy effects.

    12. Re:IT SEEMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well a pure 686 emulator wouldn't be multiplexing the hardware at all, therefore none of the instructions that a 686 might have in common with a 486 would be used to potential.

      Fuck, 686 even sounds weird to me. I've been through everything from my first 8086, 8088 "Luggable", 80286-XT (yes XT, it had an 8-bit external bus), 80386DX, 80486DX, 80486DX2, Pentium,2,3,Athlon....what generation are we on now? 80886?

    13. Re:IT SEEMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but the noise is the only part of this site worth reading!

    14. Re:IT SEEMS by sydres · · Score: 1

      well I don't run WinXP to Often since I am a Linux user so I was not aware that XP could be that extensively tuned

    15. Re:IT SEEMS by sydres · · Score: 1

      now lets try that when Longhorn hits shelves

    16. Re:IT SEEMS by Sunnan · · Score: 1

      I think Dana actually is hosting her website on one of her old macs, a Quadra I think. I'm not sure.

  20. Ultimate? by SunPin · · Score: 5, Funny

    If "has done the ultimate" equates to "has smoked crack" then, sure, it's the ultimate.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
    1. Re:Ultimate? by LS · · Score: 1

      Nice, this is one of those rare comments I read every couple weeks that makes me laugh out loud...

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  21. New Mac OS version? by Alystair · · Score: 1

    When should we expect the OS X Sloth Preview (http://www.apple.com/macosx/sloth/) to come online?

  22. Pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's more painful than watching James T. Kirk play a lawyer on TV.

  23. Simple answer ... by pavon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't know, but I want to marry her.

    1. Re:Simple answer ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn these gay "marriages"! Now all Mac users will want to get "married"!

    2. Re:Simple answer ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen her on Orkut. Not only is she listed as "single", she's in the tall community too! *drool*

    3. Re:Simple answer ... by numbski · · Score: 1

      erm...your venus?

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    4. Re:Simple answer ... by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
      I think she's cute.

      But sorry, honey, I'm already married.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    5. Re:Simple answer ... by dcgaber · · Score: 1

      Wow, and she has the requisite mac-fan-girl hoody

    6. Re:Simple answer ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a problem? Too bad. I'm married and then some.

    7. Re:Simple answer ... by baryon351 · · Score: 1

      wrong danamania. The mac-head one is at danamania.com. Photo there too if you're desperate.

  24. In case it gets ./'d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Here is the full text:

    Warning: mysql_connect(): Too many connections in /vhosts/www.appletalk.com.au/forums/sources/Driver s/mySQL.php on line 67

    Warning: mysql_select_db(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /vhosts/www.appletalk.com.au/forums/sources/Driver s/mySQL.php on line 70
    ERROR: Cannot find database appletalk
    Warning: mysql_query(): supplied argument is not a valid MySQL-Link resource in /vhosts/www.appletalk.com.au/forums/sources/Driver s/mySQL.php on line 103

    There appears to be an error with the AppleTalk Australia database.
    You can try to refresh the page by clicking here, if this does not fix the error, you can contact the board administrator by clicking here

    Error Returned

    We apologise for any inconvenience

  25. And the ETA for the TFA?-Molasses in December. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "I tried to RTFA, but the site is gone... I already see obligatory "The site must be hosted on the said Centris, lmao", etc. As of the time of writing, I didn't see any comment..."

    Wait two weeks. The first letter should appear.

  26. Re:Wow by Stevyn · · Score: 0

    BS? Isn't that what saved them back when ppc clones were killing their business?

  27. Who cares? by Radak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why does Slashdot keep covering people who waste time installing PearPC and OSX on various already-incredibly-slow pieces of aging hardware? Is Slashdot really this hard up for quality story material?

    Getting a web server to run on an Atari 800 is kind of cool. Modding a Roomba to deliver your Dr Pepper is nifty. Getting OSX to run on the slowest piece of hardware you can get Linux to run on is tired and boring.

    Don't make me start reading CNN for my news.

    1. Re:Who cares? by cgenman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because it's neat?

      In many ways getting OSX to run on an 040 based Macintosh is like playing the Matrix on a Zoetrope... Utterly pointless but damned nifty. Sure you had to create a connected series of bluetooth LCD monitors with alternating frames playing back from a 1GB CF drive, but don't it beat all that it works. And that the old macintosh is running the new mac software with a one-week boot time is even cooler and more interesting.

      If you want news, go to the BBC. If you want fanatical fandom with no grounding in reality... go to Fox. If you want nifty stuff like discussing the colors of glowsticks in 30 year old movies, you're in the right spot.

    2. Re:Who cares? by Guitarzan · · Score: 1

      Actually CNN is a much better choice for "news." Slashdot is more a place for stuff that may make you think, "Oh, that's kind of cool." You may not think this particular story is cool, but I sure hope that you don't use Slashdot as your only source of information on world events. :)

    3. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I went to the BBC and all I got was a headache.

    4. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe they can make a beowulf cluster

    5. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I have to agree with Radak. We already now that PearPC will run on Linux. What's the point of Slashdot covering it for each and every damn platform there is?

      PearPC being able to emulate a PowerPC is in itself a cool story. Using PearPC to run Mac OS X MAY be a nice footnote as in "see this works". Posting stories about PearPC and Mac OS X working on any damn f-ing platform there is, these are NOT good stories because they are boring, pointless and redundant.

      If I submit a story to /. that I managed to run, oh, WindowsXP on VirtualPC on a Mac will that get a story? No, because it is using prepackaged software on a prepackaged emulator. And the very same applies to Mac OS X on PearPC.

      Of course slashdot's quality has been going downhill for years so why am I even surprised.

    6. Re:Who cares? by zbrimhall · · Score: 0

      Utterly pointless but damned nifty.

      I have to side with the GP here. The truely nifty hack was creating a Linux distro that runs on these old beasts. From there, the feat is nothing special.

      Proposition: to make Mac OS X run on an old Centris.

      Mac OS X will install on any recent PowerPC or any environment that acts exactly like one; PearPC is an environment which acts exactly like a PowerPC, and it runs on Linux or any environment that acts exactly like Linux; Linux was made to run on an old Centris (cool!). Therefore, Mac OS X will run on an old Centris. Therefore, etc.

      Q.E.F.

      Porism: from this it is manifest that Mac OS X will run on anything that can run Linux.

    7. Re:Who cares? by cgenman · · Score: 1

      You have a surprisingly high view of the previous quality of slashdot.

      There actually has been at least one story about Windows emulating a Macintosh emulating Windows. And people using virtualizing software to virtualize virtualizing software... Splitting a computer into a client and a server in order to fully tap the potential of XWindows. This is a pretty common theme. Printing out little paper doll versions of printers. Applications that write themselves.

      While running a modern OS on an old machine with a 1 hour post time isn't groundbreaking, it is nifty. If you could get a version of Debian running on a Univac, that would be cool. So is this.

      The majority of geeks get their world news from one source: Slashdot. All that I can say about that is... STOP DOING THAT! This is a dorky, geeky website about what the SCO lawyers ate for breakfast that morning and building marble runs out of legos.

    8. Re:Who cares? by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      I hope you don't use CNN, or any one news source as your only source of information on world events. In fact, pretty much any US TV news network is suspect.

    9. Re:Who cares? by cjsnell · · Score: 1


      "It's Funny. Laugh."

  28. Wow. by bratmobile · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's the stupidest thing I've read all day long. And I've been reading POLITICS all day long.

    1. Re: Wow. by naer_dinsul · · Score: 1

      *shakes head in shame*

      As much as I agree with the parent's comment, only on slashdot would this be modded "insightful" instead of "funny"...

  29. And on the other end of the mac spectrum... by RalphBNumbers · · Score: 5, Informative

    VT has officially got the BigMac up and running faster than ever at 12.25TF with 1150 dual 2.3Ghz XServes.
    Check out the announcment.

    I wonder how many Centrises that equates to...

    --
    "The worst tyrannies were the ones where a governance required its own logic on every embedded node." - Vernor Vinge
    1. Re:And on the other end of the mac spectrum... by petsounds · · Score: 1

      Or Burning Library of Congresses for that matter...

    2. Re:And on the other end of the mac spectrum... by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 1

      Ironically, I'll bet that thing takes a week to cold boot, too.

      --
      Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
      Africus aut Europaeus?
    3. Re:And on the other end of the mac spectrum... by dowobeha · · Score: 1
      Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
      Africus aut Europaeus?

      Dude, do you really have a sig that quotes Monty Python is Latin?

      I don't know whether to be impressed or embarrased...

      --
      I am concerned about any program, any piece of hardware, any treaty, any law that treats me as a consumer, not a citizen
    4. Re:And on the other end of the mac spectrum... by Barto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to this page, a 25MHz 68040 CPU (the one in the Centris 650) runs at 3.5MF (which is almost certainly the manufacturer's 'benchmark' and not a real one but still useful for a ball-park figure).

      To achieve 12.25TF using Centris 650s you would need more than 3.5 million of them (more than because of the overestimated FLOPs and degraded performance of clustering).

      A single Centris 650 displaces 0.2 cubic meters, 3.5 million of them would displace 73816 cubic metres, or 42 metres in every direction.

    5. Re:And on the other end of the mac spectrum... by dr00g911 · · Score: 1

      Uh, so the answer is... a metric fuckload faster?

    6. Re:And on the other end of the mac spectrum... by StandardDeviant · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many Centrises that equates to...

      At a guess, all of them. :)

    7. Re:And on the other end of the mac spectrum... by White+Roses · · Score: 1
      42 metres in every direction.

      DNA was right. 42.

      --
      Do not touch -Willie
  30. But you know... by tgeller · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...it's still better than Windown XP.

    --
    Tom Geller
    1. Re:But you know... by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      Boots faster, too.

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  31. Re:And in other news, I sat and watched plaster dr by tigress · · Score: 1

    And I thought I was bad...

  32. A useless and valuable exercise by Y-Crate · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course, people always ask "Does this have any practical use?"

    Absolutely not. But that it not the point. In The Real World imagination and creativity are the driving force. How do you foster that? By challenging yourself and inspiring others. There does not have to be any realistic application as much as there needs to be a thought process behind it that can be capitalized on in the future. Experiments such as this drive the imagination and the mind into new directions and those new paths we explore can lead to really, really utterly brilliant things that can have a profound effect on our lives.

    In school, a teacher once told me "Answers don't really matter at all. The process you use to reach your conclusions is the most important thing in the world." It blew my little mind open to the true nature of creativity and for the first time I valued it in a way that was truly profound.

    1. Re:A useless and valuable exercise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, this isn't exactly valuable, because the only difference between doing this and installing Mac OS X on Linux on a modern machine is that this is hundreds of times slower. The RAM limit is not a problem as long as the kernel can stay loaded - it just means lots of virtual memory. And the CPU speed doesn't affect any of the programs.

      If you want to apply creativity for no practical purpose, go for something like art, or writing, or pure math.

    2. Re:A useless and valuable exercise by Merlinium · · Score: 1

      Oh and BTW, you get an F for your final exam and are going to flunk out. The answers may not matter to you, but they sure as hell matter to those in charge!

      --
      If firefighters fight fire and crime fighters fight crime, what do Freedom fighters fight?
    3. Re:A useless and valuable exercise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did one of this teacher's students design the Paris air terminal building by any chance? (I mean the one that fell down.)

  33. Journal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    OSX load journal: Day 6: Power outage.

    1. Re:Journal by mooniejohnson · · Score: 1

      Dear Diary: Today I tried to load the AppleTalk daemon. It's so hard, but I think I can do it! All the other, faster kids were laughing at me... even the other special ed. kid in the class, Gentoo. I'll show them! After I get AppleTalk up, I'm thinking of starting a system logger, or ipfw. I think I can... I think I can...

      --The Centris That Could

      --

      Elmo knows where you live!

    2. Re:Journal by JasonBee · · Score: 1

      Oh for Chrissakes...

      They NEVER would have seen this happen if they'd used my state-of-the-art Lemon Juice and Copper Wire UPS array.

      Best part is drinking the expired battery acid of course. You need a lot of lemons.

      Learn dammit! Bring a juicer next time!

  34. That is a bullshit answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I mean really, what the fuck is that supposed to mean? I don't go around killing people just because I can. I go around killing people because it makes my dick hard.

    1. Re:That is a bullshit answer. by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I mean really, what the fuck is that supposed to mean? I don't go around killing people just because I can."

      Would you go around killing people if you couldn't?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:That is a bullshit answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's why people always say "Why not?" when asked why. "Because I can" is a valid reason why, but there may be a reason "why not" that overrides making your dick hard. Or your pussy wet, whatever the case may be. In the example you mentioned, killing people would cause additional people to come and either kill or jail you, which would impede the hardening and the use of your dick. However, running os x on a machine that takes a week to boot has no known negative consequences other than being made fun of and wasting time, so someone who gets hard off attention and time wasting faces a win/win proposition.

    3. Re:That is a bullshit answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear oh dear. Your posts are getting worse and worse.

    4. Re:That is a bullshit answer. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Depends on how ya look at it. ;)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:That is a bullshit answer. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Funny

      I mean really, what the fuck is that supposed to mean? I don't go around killing people just because I can. I go around killing people because it makes my dick hard.

      Well, at least you're not killing puppies so you can have an orgasm. There's already enough game consoles on the market as it is.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    6. Re:That is a bullshit answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird!
      I do!

    7. Re:That is a bullshit answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends if you look at it.

    8. Re:That is a bullshit answer. by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      How would jailing impede dick-use?
      I mean, based on precedent and stuff.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    9. Re:That is a bullshit answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never once seen a live porcupine inside an occupied jail cell.

    10. Re:That is a bullshit answer. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      So... you didn't look at it?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:That is a bullshit answer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are in serious need of some Canadian pharmaceuticals... especially Vallium and Vicodin.
      If that doesn't work then you should enlist in the Army to be sent to Iraq.

  35. And.... by penguinbrat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To achieve this, she's had to run it under PearPC on Debian...

    Is the excitement here that Debian ran just fine on something so old, the great work from the developers of PearPC or what it takes to get an OS to take a week to boot?

  36. need a speed bump? by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

    I'll donate my Quadra 840AV. 40 MHz, bay-bee! Ought to be able to get the boot time down to about 4.5 days with that!

  37. I hope... by The+Grey+Clone · · Score: 0

    I hope the power doesn't blink.

  38. Watch by headbulb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Watch as danamania gets a whole lot of new slashdot friends just because she's a girl...

    I know I added her to my friend list.

    Ok off-topic but I thought it was funny.

    1. Re:Watch by rune.w · · Score: 2, Funny

      The funny thing is that you were moded Insightful... Sad, very sad.

    2. Re:Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      i'd do her

      just turned 19 too!!

    3. Re:Watch by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 5, Funny

      i'd do her

      As opposed to your usual crusty tube sock ... yeah I'm sure she's flattered

    4. Re:Watch by ari_j · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not hot for her because she's a chick. I'm hot for her because she's a chick who gets modded up.

    5. Re:Watch by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, look at that comment history. She doesn't have a single non-modded up comment in the past 24. To quote Real Ultimate Power, that's bragable!

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    6. Re:Watch by gearry · · Score: 1

      OK, is it just me, or is that the most normal profile I have ever read for someone on /. ? I mean, where is all the h4X0r language and stuff? She doesn't mention anything relating to computers at all. Is she schizo or just ashamed? Is this really the same person?

      --
      like g-a-r-y, only different
    7. Re:Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I like using a pair of silky tights. Socks are too abrasive.

  39. I Guess by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

    Nothing is imposible after all...now wake me up when they get it to work on a mac plus.

    1. Re:I Guess by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I'll take an SE30 with 128MB RAM, thanks (it's possible with 16MB modules, but I can buy a beat up G3 for the price of the RAM to get an SE30 to 128MB).

      The SE30 is the least amount of computer that Linux/m68k would run on.

      A Mac Plus is NEVER going to happen. The Mac Plus maxes out at 4MB RAM, and I doubt MacBochs could keep up like that.

    2. Re:I Guess by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      I found a place last year (sadly, out of business now,) that sold SE/30 compatible 16MB SIMMs for $5 a piece. I bought a few dozen of 'em. Now my SE/30 and my IIci are maxed at 128MB.

      She (dana, the doer of this deed,) stated she wants to try it on a Mac II (16MHz 68020,) but it's lack of MMU (or FPU) probably prevents that. For that matter, the SE/30's lack of FPU probably dooms it, as well. (Although that would rock. Now I'm tempted to try it, though. Better than the Mini-ITX PC in an SE/30 shell. http://www.mini-itx.com/projects/mac-itx/)

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
    3. Re:I Guess by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      As long as you've got an MMU, you're good.

      If you can find a 68020-based box with an MMU (an Amiga, maybe?), Debian will work on it.

  40. Hy guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tomorrow's Tuesday, wait to post the Apple news then...

  41. Do the Gentoo next! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is next? Stage1 Gentoo install?

  42. ha ha ha ha ha ha, XP on a 486DX66?? by pbjones · · Score: 1

    ha ha ha ha ha ha, they should have used a 840AV, and got an FPU included in the box and 40MHz, (80MHz in PC speak)

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  43. Dana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure I have the same question as every other slashdoter out there...

    Are you single?

  44. One week? by chiller2 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That's almost as long as it'll take their webserver to return a page during the slashdotting :)

    --
    --- Commission free trading & free stock up to $500 - use http://share.robinhood.com/kelvinp6 :)
  45. Try it backwards - old OS on new machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Relating this to the previous article on the Spectrum machines - one nifty aspect of those "ancient" computers was that if (or better: when) the computer crashed, you just flicked the power off, then on, and you were back in business (ok, back to square one) in a second. Contrast that to the lengthy startup time of modern computers.

    Computers are getting faster and faster, and yet boot time remains too long. Imagine doing the opposite - running early OSs on modern hardware. Startup should be fast, software execution should be a blaze.

    And hey, old software or not, I did plenty of good work on a Centris. And it was the most advanced computer at the time...

    1. Re:Try it backwards - old OS on new machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It really was not the "most advanced computer at the time". It was a mid-tier machine.

    2. Re:Try it backwards - old OS on new machine by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correct. IIRC, the Quadra was the top-of-the-line model. The Centris was mid-end, and the Classic and LC lines were bottom-of-the-line. (Classic being an all-in-one LC, essentially, in the Color models)

    3. Re:Try it backwards - old OS on new machine by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      Theoretically yes, but the difference was more marketing than anything else. My C650 was faster than my friend's Q700. Of course, shortly after I bought it they rolled out a new Quadra that was faster, but still.

      The "Centris" name was canned in less than a year. (Three tiers was too many product lines.) The 610 and 650 got a speed bump to 33 MHz and were relabeled as Quadras.

    4. Re:Try it backwards - old OS on new machine by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      And now look... there are three tiers again, and two on their laptop and media player lines.

      Power - top of the line, couldn't afford one in your wildest dreams
      i - mid-end (bottom-of-the-line in laptops)
      e - bottom-of-the-line

      Why didn't they call the iPod Mini the ePod, and make a wireless music jukebox called the PowerPod?

    5. Re:Try it backwards - old OS on new machine by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      I consider Power/i to be the two tiers. The eMac can almost be neglected altogether - is one product enough to be called a tier? It's for a very small market niche.

  46. Installing the Hard Drive was worst part by VonGuard · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't know if any of you have ever had to work on that 650 chasis, but it's a fucking bitch to deal with. The undercarriage is where the hard drive lives, and it's bolted to the outside, so actually accessing the bay it lives in is an act in near futility.

    And they kept that damn chasis around until the 7100's...

    Truly, an amazing feat to deal with that obnoxious piece of design.

    Oh, and the sharpened metal edges inside the case are murder on the knuckles.

    --
    Don't Crease the Weasel!
    1. Re:Installing the Hard Drive was worst part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if any of you have ever had to work on that 650 chasis, but it's a fucking bitch to deal with. The undercarriage is where the hard drive lives, and it's bolted to the outside, so actually accessing the bay it lives in is an act in near futility.


      I don't know which centris you're talking about, but the 650s I worked with just needed the top case sliding off, and there's the HD sitting right out in plain view on top of everything.

      The CDROM however, was a cow.

  47. Wow... by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

    That has to be excruciatingly slow, even getting that set up and the software installed. A week to boot? I hope they didn't have to compile the kernel for that particular processor... What version of Debian is it, 0.01?

    --
    There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  48. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'd be like a giant electrical black hole!

  49. So in a week from now... by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 3, Funny

    If someone trips over the power cord, or the power goes out, does she have the patience to start over?

    So the G3 Emulates at 50Khz with PearPC. Bet she wishes she could have used Cherry OS!

    --
    "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
    1. Re:So in a week from now... by NiceGeek · · Score: 1

      Heh....same difference according to recent reports.

    2. Re:So in a week from now... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      If someone trips over the power cord, or the power goes out, does she have the patience to start over?

      Remember, for her it's just a matter of plugging the thing back in and starting it back up. The poor little Centris is the one that has to do all the work. Good thing computers are infinently patient.

    3. Re:So in a week from now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Good thing computers are infinently patient.

      Especially if they get stuck in an infinite loop.

  50. Useless and Wonderful... by venomkid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I feel sorry for people who bitch about how this has no "practical" use. I can't help thinking they're the same ones who walk into art museums and make winning comments like "pfff, I could do THAT..."

    --
    vk.
    1. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by Bishop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      seriously. a true geek or nerd is always asking questions and wondering if something will work. I can only surmise from the negative response that many of the posters are reading the wrong website.

      kudos to danamania for wondering if this would work. it is useless, but it still geeky cool.

    2. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by syousef · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I feel sorry for people who bitch about how this has no "practical" use. I can't help thinking they're the same ones who walk into art museums and make winning comments like "pfff, I could do THAT..."

      You're comparing this to fine art????? Walk away from your computer RIGHT NOW and get a life. Start by talking a walk in the fresh air or talking face to face with another human being.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by Bishop · · Score: 1

      fuck it.

      On furthure reflection it occured to me that if it were not for people like danamania humanity would still be trying to figure out the plow. Hell most of humanity would still be stumped by cave paintings.

      Hmm. Is the plow the most important invention in all of Civilization? Discuss.

    4. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by Brightest+Light · · Score: 1

      Installing OS X on an ancient piece of hardware would be a neat hack...but whoop de do, they found the slowest box they could run linux on, and emulated OS X. That's kind of neat, but certainly not something that belongs on the front page of slashdot.

    5. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by venomkid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're comparing this to fine art?????Walk away from your computer RIGHT NOW and get a life. Start by talking a walk in the fresh air or talking face to face with another human being.

      Wow, way to miss the forest...

      --
      vk.
    6. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by syousef · · Score: 1

      Its your life kid.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    7. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by syousef · · Score: 1

      *Chuckle* Gotta love /. I've never seen anything go from 2:insightful to -1:flamebait in about 1 minute. Some people don't have a clue what art is. These are the same people who When given lots of money buy paintings made by an elephant with its trunk in standing in front of a jumbo jet engine.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    8. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by venomkid · · Score: 1

      Looking stupid once just wasn't enough for you, was it?

      --
      vk.
    9. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by syousef · · Score: 1

      Looking stupid once just wasn't enough for you, was it?

      You think doing technically hard things with absolutely no practical use is on the same level as producing fine art, and you're calling me stupid?

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    10. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by venomkid · · Score: 1

      You think doing technically hard things with absolutely no practical use is on the same level as producing fine art, and you're calling me stupid?

      "Technically hard things with no practical use" is an intriguing description of art.

      Thanks!

      --
      vk.
    11. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by syousef · · Score: 1

      "Technically hard things with no practical use" is an intriguing description of art.

      Go on call me stupid again but that's a pathetic definition/description of what art is. It would be techinically difficult to climb mount Everest, running the whole way wihtout stopping, and with a goat under one arm, while singing "I am a turnip" at the top of your lungs. I would not however call it art. Nor would I call it a practical achievement, nor would it make me suddenly respect whoever did it. Yet even this insane (and impossible) act would still be more artistic and creative than running a modern operating system under emulation on the slowest piece of shit hardware you can find.

      You wouldn't know what art was if it bit you on the buttocks, and I don't have the time or inclination to try to inform you in a public forum. Get a clue and sod off. (Not necessarily in that order).

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    12. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by Shag · · Score: 1

      I thought the people who don't have a clue what art is were the ones who went around trying to tell other people what was, and wasn't, art. :)

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    13. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by venomkid · · Score: 1

      If missing the point was a martial art, you could start your own dojo.

      --
      vk.
    14. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by syousef · · Score: 1

      I thought the people who don't have a clue what art is were the ones who went around trying to tell other people what was, and wasn't, art. :)

      That's your argument? A slightly more sophisticated "Nyer nyer I'm rubber you're glue whatever you say bounces off me and sticks on you"?

      Get a clue people. It is ridiculous to suggest that it is art to take a very slow machine and run a modern OS under emulation on it. Comparing it to fine art is even worse - you're basically insulting every famous painter that ever lived. These people spend years perfecting their skills. You're comparing this to spending hours, or days installing software then walking away and coming back every once in while to watch it trying to boot. How wonderful...

      Someone somewhere is going to make a lot of money out of you.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    15. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by Shag · · Score: 1

      I'm not the one who made the comparison to fine art, but I certainly think it's "art" in the broader sense. I'm guessing that either you're some sort of fine-art snob, or you've honestly never encountered the concept of "installation art" or "performance art."

      Making a horribly old machine run a modern OS via emulation, and more importantly posting a log of how long it takes to do seemingly meaningless tasks, is "art" in the same way as hooking up all the lights in a tall building to a computer and setting up a web script to let people display messages on the building.

      (I believe that latter one is done in Germany or somewhere else in Europe, each year.)

      I don't think you, I, or anyone else in the world -- especially any of us Slashdot geeks -- is remotely qualified to dictate to others what is, and isn't, art. Art is part of culture, and cultural absolutism isn't a very healthy thing in a heterogenous world.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    16. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You wouldn't know what art was if it bit you on the buttocks, and I
      > don't have the time or inclination to try to inform you in a public
      > forum. Get a clue and sod off. (Not necessarily in that order

      Since you haven't made even a single point besides being abusive, I can only consider you're a troll who really doesn't have a clue and is purposely missing the point in order to complain.

      And as one of those whiners you're revealing yourself to be, your whining is a reflection in a mirror.

      Looking at your previous posting history you ARE no more than a whiney complaining troll. It's the only thing that people like yourself who don't bother to go out and actually DO things can fall back on.

    17. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by syousef · · Score: 1

      Try not posting as AC and then maybe we can talk. I haven't had a lot modded up but I've had runs of stuff at 4 and 5. I'd write more but you're unlikely to read this. That is of course assuming its not just the same person posting as AC.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    18. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Try not posting as AC and then maybe we can talk

      You still seem to be responding.

    19. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by neitzsche · · Score: 1

      Occasionally, when meta-moderating, I run across a post that really catches my attention. Your post was one such post.

      I almost meta-modd'ed it unfair automatically because it was clearly meant to be funny, yet was marked flamebait. Having read the entire thread it is clear to me this was much more than a poor attempt at humor.

      Technical accomplishments most certainly can be a form of art; I don't think anyone is asking *you* to appreciate it. But your flippant dismisal of even the posibilty of someone else apreciating it is just wrong.

      -1 Flamebait: Fair.

      (I meta-moderate more than I moderate. I like to think I give careful consideration to moderations as well.)

      --
      "God is dead." - Frederik Nietzsche
    20. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by syousef · · Score: 1

      Flamebait: A Usenet posting or other message intended to trigger a flame war, or one that invites flames in reply.

      I was not trying to do that but I am entitled to the opinion that the comparison of a technically difficult but useless thing to fine art is insulting to fine art, and essentially shows zero class when it comes to what some people think of as art.

      If you don't like that, you're entitled to your opinion too - moderate/meta-moderate as you will - but don't you dare have the arrogance and audacity to tell me what my intentions are or were, let alone how I should think. Who made you my judge or keeper?

      I have found repeatedly that moderation on /. is not a reflection of the merits of the post, but rather a reflection of the popularity of the comment. For example criticise ease of use problems with say Linux or Thunderbird - regardless of the merits of the argument - and see if you don't get moderated right down 9 times out of 10. Its disgusting but I suppose its my fault for expecting more maturity out of some. What do you think the end result of that is? Inane posts increase, and critical thinking decreases.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    21. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by syousef · · Score: 1

      > Try not posting as AC and then maybe we can talk

      You still seem to be responding.

      This is a response too. I didn't say I wouldn't respond. I said I wouldn't talk as in argue the point. (Technically write not talk, just in case you're too feeble minded to understand not to take things literally).

      Having fun yet?

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    22. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're correct in looking at the original complainer's comments about "fine art". It's honing in on one facet of a topic and completely ignoring "the point".

      I once knew a fellow in Sydney, who sounded very much like this guy. He wasn't a bad bloke, but we knew not to be too abstract around him as he'd do things like this.

      Talking to his sister once, she invited him to her son's school play which was a version of Romeo & Juliet, put on by 9 year olds. Yes it'd been adapted & changed, but was still based on R&J. The kid loved acting, and she was so proud she wanted to show him off.

      Her brother snobbed her because, in his words "I've seen shakespeare, and believe me this will not be shakespeare".

      While technically true, it's also the same case of "whoa, way to miss the entire point!".

    23. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by neitzsche · · Score: 1
      Flamebait: A Usenet posting or other message intended to trigger a flame war, or one that invites flames in reply.

      I was not trying to do that but I am entitled to the opinion that the comparison of a technically difficult but useless thing to fine art is insulting to fine art, and essentially shows zero class when it comes to what some people think of as art.

      Whether you were trying to do that or not, you seem to have incited a discussion thread that had on one side you claiming that a technically difficult feat cannot be art, and a whole lot of technical people on the other side rebuking your insulting assertion. Even now, you are maintaining an insulting tone ("zero class") rather than taking a moment to consider that your argument may in fact be (unintentionally) fallicious. To say that something of questionable artistic value is an insult to "fine art" by exisiting, seems absurd to me. (And apparently, only you were questioning the artistic value.)

      Do you program? Is it that you can't appreciate artistic qualities of technical works?

      If you don't like that, you're entitled to your opinion too - moderate/meta-moderate as you will - but don't you dare have the arrogance and audacity to tell me what my intentions are or were, let alone how I should think. Who made you my judge or keeper?

      In this instance, a random value produced in slashcode indicated that I, on this SINGLE occasion, was to be the arbitrar of moderation for your single post.

      Moderators are not at liberty to reply on this thread (or they'd undo their previous moderation.) Meta-moderators do. Moderators can reply to your personal journal, (if you have an entry there that allows responses.) I imagine the random moderator who initially gave you a negative moderation was more disturbed by your post than I, since it was marked "flamebait" and not "overrated."

      I fail to see how I acted arrogantly or audaciously. I don't recall telling you what your intentions were, nor telling you what to think! Looking farther back in this thread, I see nothing of the sort.

      I have found repeatedly that moderation on /. is not a reflection of the merits of the post, but rather a reflection of the popularity of the comment. For example criticise ease of use problems with say Linux or Thunderbird - regardless of the merits of the argument - and see if you don't get moderated right down 9 times out of 10. Its disgusting but I suppose its my fault for expecting more maturity out of some. What do you think the end result of that is? Inane posts increase, and critical thinking decreases.

      I agree that moderation often reflects the popularity of the post. I have run afoul of the same problem frequently. The phenomenon seems even more exaggerated on politics.slashdot.org.

      The initial purpose for moderation was to weed out outrageous trolls. Your post, indeed, does not fall into that category. But your stubborn refusal to respect others opinions, repeatedly asserting that your view is the only possible correct view (based perhaps on a fallicious argument or poor wording) is problematic. Again, your opinion seems to be that this technical feat has no artistic value; but your assertion is that it is insulting to fine art. That sir, it is not.

      In the end, I found that someone's negative moderation of your post, was fair. It's just a one-time meta-moderation; I trust the randomness of slashdot meta-moderation will not align me personally with one of your posts again anytime soon.

      Do I think that as a result of moderation and meta-moderation, inane posts will increase, and critical thinging will decrease? Perhaps. Politics.slashdot.org is good evidence toward that end. However, without moderation & meta-moderation, I'm sure we'd find the /. discussion threads utterly unbearable. Do you have a systemic improvement to suggest? Perhaps a moderation category of "-1: unpopular opinion" or "-1: fallacy"? Would that have changed the outcome here?
      --
      "God is dead." - Frederik Nietzsche
    24. Re:Useless and Wonderful... by syousef · · Score: 1

      Whether you were trying to do that or not, you seem to have incited a discussion thread that had on one side you claiming that a technically difficult feat cannot be art, and a whole lot of technical people on the other side rebuking your insulting assertion.

      Now you're completely mis-stating my argument. I was not saying that a technically difficult feat cannot be art. I was stating that a specific useless and inelegant technical demonstration was not art.

      You either haven't taken the time to understand what I was saying, or are incapable of doing so. If you're going to paraphrase what I say be kind enough to be accurate damn it!

      Do you program? Is it that you can't appreciate artistic qualities of technical works?

      Actually, I make my living programming and am a hobbyist to boot. I find this kind of stupidity abhorent, and so will other people who code. You're just plain being arrogant and condescending.

      I fail to see how I acted arrogantly or audaciously. I don't recall telling you what your intentions were, nor telling you what to think! Looking farther back in this thread, I see nothing of the sort.

      Then open your eyes.

      The initial purpose for moderation was to weed out outrageous trolls. Your post, indeed, does not fall into that category.


      Then why meta-moderate it as troll, if you don't agree with it? I wonder if you're just trying to get a rise out of me...

      Anyway, I'm bored with this, and have better things to do like watch grass grow. If you wish to believe that anything technically difficult is also "beautiful", "wonderful" and "artistic" then that's your problem. Anyone can meta-moderate so have fun with that too. Have a nice life. Further posts will be ignored.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  51. I think it booted already... by digitalgimpus · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... and is hosting the webpage linked in the article... because the server is that slowww....

    It would be funny if they install SETI@Home, and that weak machine finds ET's signal...

    oh how the AMD kiddies will cry. ;-)

    1. Re:I think it booted already... by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      You laugh, but I'm fairly certain that at one time, Dana was running a Quadra 605 as her primary Web server. That would certainly explain it ;)

      p

  52. But the question is... by spaeschke · · Score: 1

    Can CherryOS emulate it?

  53. its not running ON the centris by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Its running on pearPC..

    Its just a emulator.. it doesn't change the fact you are NOT I repeat NOT running OSX on pre G3 hardware.. You are pretending you are..

    Now, that said, *great* credit goes to the pearPC guys for their work.. But please.. get the damned stories right...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:its not running ON the centris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BUT OS X *can* run on pre g3 hardware...

      I believe 10.1 will run on pci-based powermacs with 604, 604e, 604ev, and 603e procs

    2. Re:its not running ON the centris by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it's running ON pearpc running ON centris..
      they stack. hell, it's got even linux in the mix.

      you're not pretending that you're running it unless you would CLAIM to run it natively. besides, they admit it's just a pointless project.

      if the said os boots on a software process running on said hardware.. wtf else are you doing than booting it up on pre-g3 hardware?

      or does he PRETEND to see the booting icon then?

      or is it also PRETENDING when you run virtualpc on mac and do some text editing in windows, imaginary friends?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:its not running ON the centris by kundor · · Score: 1
      it's OS X, and it's running on the centris.

      Doesn't matter what's enabling it to run, the terminology is perfectly correct. It's OSX running on pre G3 hardware.

    4. Re:its not running ON the centris by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      So, if I put my car in a plane, I can say my car is capable of flying?

      Sorry, the terminology is NOT correct, Regardless of what you morons think.

      ( but again, im NOT slighting the pearPC project, i think its they are doing a great job.. its just the idiots that keep claiming 'look im runing OSX on xyz' that irratate me to no end ....)

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    5. Re:its not running ON the centris by kundor · · Score: 2, Funny
      This isn't hard.

      What kind of hardware is it? It's a Centris. Is there any other hardware involved? No.

      What is the software that's running? Oh my gosh, it's OS X. Is it a mockup of OS X? No. Is it a program that pretends to be OS X? No. It's an actual copy of OS X, and it's running.

      So OS X is running. What is it running on? Is it running on some mythical G5 processor in the ether that magically instantiates itself when it senses OS X code on other hardware? Why, no, it's running on the Centris.

      See OS X. See OS X run. Run, OS X, run.

  54. I've done similarly stupid things... by sakusha · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but not intentionally. A friend of mine once called me over to his shop to check out his new IBM PC 286 clone and a clone-PostScript laser printer. You can tell this was a LONG time ago. I fired up Corel Draw and did a few odd things, like a PostScript pattern fill inside a clipping path. I sent it to print and nothing happened. It was 5PM on Friday, he said he never turns off his computers, so we just left it running and left for the weekend.
    On monday morning, I got an excited phone call from my friend, the page had just popped out of the printer! That means the print job ran on the laser printer's processor for about 2.5 days.

  55. All well and good but... by PhaxMohdem · · Score: 1

    Show me OS X running on my palm IIIx and I will bow down and worship you.

    --

    The Property of One's : "The Oneitude is directly proportional to the Colditude of the one." - S.B.

  56. architecture issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm having trouble understanding how OS X can run on a 68040. i'm not super familiar with that chip, but i assume that, being an older cpu, it has a subset of the instruction set available on the G5, kind of like a 386 is a subset of a p4 or athlonXP. if it is a subset, and therefore does not have all the instructions of a G5, how can OS X, which as far as I know can only be obtained as binaries, run on the 68040?

    1. Re:architecture issues? by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 1

      Pear is an emulator.

      --
      There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
    2. Re:architecture issues? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but the m68k and PPC have nothing to do with each other, except for the fact that both were used by Apple in their Macs, and that PPCs emulated m68ks for years.

  57. I feel your pain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I run OSX 10.2.8 and 9.2 using MOL at the same time running Yellowdog Linux as my VM host. My 400mhz G3 workstation has 384mb RAM. The 20 and 10 gb "drives" are actually disk images that are served up via NFS from an AMD 900mhz Slackware Linux box saturating an overwhelmed switched 100mbit LAN. The Mac VMs never know that they are "just another job" in top.

    You don't even want to know what my VMs are like in the x86 world.

    As far as that 650, well I never loved a mac more than the old Quadras I had. I miss those pizza boxes. Those machines ran OS 7.x just fine, but that is where it stopped IMHO.

    That user has got a lot of guts. =)

  58. Welcome to Slash(apple)dot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously guys. There's something like 5 Apple posts per day. And they're mostly along the line of "Apple user does something senseless - let's think about it!"

    Ooo oo! Mac IIci owner removed floppy drive and installs it on his G5 desktop! We need a thread!

  59. You GO, girl! by jonfullmer · · Score: 1

    From an admiring fan with his own Mac SE/30 (68030) w/ 128 MB of RAM running Debian (hey, it makes a GREAT web server).

    1. Re:You GO, girl! by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Umm... how much did that RAM cost?

      I'm thinking it was over $20 for a 16MB stick when I was checking out feasability of SE30 hacks.

    2. Re:You GO, girl! by jonfullmer · · Score: 1

      It's been a long time, but I think it was about $50 for 64 MB (four 30-pin SIMMs). Don't remember where I bought them. It was about 7 or 8 years ago.

    3. Re:You GO, girl! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      128MB!!
      Holy shit. Back when I bought my SE/30, I was so proud of her 4MB RAM, and that cost plenty too.

  60. Linux on an Abacus... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's nothing.

    When my port of Linux on an Abacus is complete, I shall hold the true crown of new stuff on old shit geekiness! (Though, I wonder if people are going to say I cheated because I had to overclock it a little, and I added a few more beads to increase bandwidth.)

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    1. Re:Linux on an Abacus... by Gleng · · Score: 1
      Linux on an Abacus

      "Oop! Someone wants to copy a file!"

      *clicketty clicketty clack click clicketty clicketty*

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    2. Re:Linux on an Abacus... by Nonillion · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a userfriendly cartoon where pitr was relegated to an abacus, and when he complained about it's memory storage he was just handed another abacus..

      --
      "I bow to no man" - Riddick
    3. Re:Linux on an Abacus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Is your abacus 64 or 32 bead? (Please don't tell me you are trying it on a 16 bead system. That is futile.)

    4. Re:Linux on an Abacus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, my dream is to port Clippy using the actual paperclips. But the problem is, everytime it starts to work, I have this urge to start smacking it with a stapler.

  61. BTW by dark-br · · Score: 1

    ...she's the greatest karmawhore ever or being a girl suddenly makes all your comments go "+5 wanna date me"

  62. This is why I love hackers . . . . . by theparanoidcynic · · Score: 1

    Panther on a computer only slightly more powerful than my TI-89. This may be the ultimate "because it's there" story.

    For the next trick I'd like to see this thing running windows, using qemu, inside panter.

    What? You mean it would take a year to load? Damn. :P

    --
    Only in a Slashdot fantasy can a Slackware install turn into several hours of sex . . . . .
    1. Re:This is why I love hackers . . . . . by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      I'll donate a 610 with a DOS card in it... I've always wanted to visit the past!

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  63. The owl says.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one....a two....three *crash*

    three

  64. This is perfect for those of us in tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first thing we do is have the customer reboot the computer. If they are really annoying we can then ask for personal time a week from now.

  65. boot time of 1 week?! by jxyama · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...so does that mean it automatically gets an "uptime" of 150 hours? that is stability, baby!

    1. Re:boot time of 1 week?! by RedBear · · Score: 1

      If that's your basis for comparison then according to the RIAA my dual 867MHz machine gets 1,664.64 hours of uptime per day! Sweet.

    2. Re:boot time of 1 week?! by LakeSolon · · Score: 1

      Actually, I seriously wonder what the uptime will say right after boot. At what point during boot does a Mac OS X (or any) machine 'start the clock'?

      ~Lake

  66. Very simple response by hoborocks · · Score: 1

    Why not?

    --
    AccountKiller
  67. Re:Wow by LMariachi · · Score: 1

    It "gets around" the clause by virtue of the fact that a Centris is Apple hardware.

  68. so what? by Vash_066 · · Score: 1

    Takes a week to load? Sounds like my old M.E. machine.

  69. Re:And in other news, I sat and watched plaster dr by CDLI · · Score: 1

    No, he is bad.

  70. Amen, brother! Preach it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I never once managed to work on one of those machines without bleeding. Those and the 8100/8500 (take the whole fucking thing apart to add RAM! yay!) cases were the absolute worst that Apple ever produced.

    Luckily, someone at Apple finally woke up and realized how terrible their cases were, and the very next generation of Power Macs (the 72/73/75/76 and 8600) were the complete opposite, a total joy to work with.

  71. Re:And in other news, I sat and watched plaster dr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This one qualifies for the "Too Much Time on Their Hands Award".

    Mac Centris 650's have been nominated for this award for years. Perhaps this will be enough to help them win this year.

  72. "Why bother?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was about to ask "why bother," when I realized that I had spent quite a few hours today figuring out how to code an app to send keypress events to an NES emulator in order to automate the levelling up process in a copy of the Japanese Final Fantasy II that's been translated to English by some good samaritans.

    Hurray for geeks :)

    1. Re:"Why bother?" by omega9 · · Score: 1

      You've been waiting all day to toot your own horn about that shit, haven't you?

      --
      I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
  73. Re:And in other news, I sat and watched plaster dr by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    ASCII manga?

  74. secure?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    I don't know about you guys.. but for that server to dump this as an error message to just anyone is just waiting to be exploited... SQL injection anyone? I think this has provided a few table names and fields names to get started..
    mySQL query error: SELECT t.*, f.topic_mm_id, f.name as forum_name, f.quick_reply, f.id as forum_id, f.read_perms, f.reply_perms, f.parent_id, f.use_html,
    f.start_perms, f.allow_poll, f.password, f.posts as forum_posts, f.topics as forum_topics, f.upload_perms,
    f.show_rules, f.rules_text, f.rules_title,
    c.name as cat_name, c.id as cat_id
    FROM ibf_topics t, ibf_forums f , ibf_categories c
    WHERE t.tid=2003 and f.id = t.forum_id and f.category=c.id

    mySQL error: Too many connections
    mySQL error code:
    Date: Tuesday 26th of October 2004 10:10:26 AM
  75. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  76. The race is on... by NMEismyNME · · Score: 1

    Even if the jury is still out about whether emulation is cheating, someone with access to a 50mhz mac could possibly have this thing booted in three and a half days...

    1. Re:The race is on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you hard core slash dot nerds are such haters. i mean really, you make it seem like anyone could just get it to work. if you read her page, IT TOOK EFFORT to get debian unbloated enought to run pear in the first place. and.. FOR ALL INTENTS and PURPOSES SHE IS RUNNNING OS X on a CENTRIS. i mean really.... OSx is running- doesn't matter how it happened just that it happened. stop your envy and admire.

  77. Re:wow by pclminion · · Score: 4, Funny
    imagine a beowolf cluster of those...

    I started to, but it'll take me 52.6 years to finish imagining it.

  78. largely infintesimal by LiquidMind · · Score: 0

    "...is almost exactly..."

    i always wonder behind the validity of this phrase. If it's not exactly a specific value, then it is not exact. I guess it's just one of those things.

    yes yes i know off-topic, but i can't be the only one who's ever thought about it.

    --
    This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
  79. Slashdotted! by princxixor · · Score: 0

    Hmm, which will take longer to load? The OS or the website?

  80. What ??? by c0p0n · · Score: 0

    ...you wanna b0rk your penis plugging it on ... err ... slot?

    --

    Your head a splode
  81. perspective by tverbeek · · Score: 1
    Well, this certainly makes me feel better about the OS-X-powered beige PowerMac G3 I use at work. (The "real" computers are for the students and faculty I help support, as it should be.)

    For funsies, today my officemate and I were playing with an old Classic we found in storage, tricked out with 10MB RAM, 250MB hard drive, and running Photoshop 3.0, Pagemaker 5.0, etc. and some old games downloaded from UMich's archives.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:perspective by Stochio · · Score: 0

      Hey! I'm indirectly paying you! Get back to work!

    2. Re:perspective by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      Hey! I'm indirectly paying you! Get back to work!

      Really? Well I'm indirectly supporting you, so there. :)

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  82. Apple Statement by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    While they may be misleading, Apple did say it wont run on anything earlier then a G3 ( i forget which model of G3).

    I've been wanting to try it on my old 6100 for fun... Perhaps its worth a go to see how slow it is... ( yes i realize its a nubus, not pci .. but nothing to lose by trying.. )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  83. Orkut by acidblood · · Score: 1

    Guess we finally figured out what hardware Google's been hosting Orkut on.

    --

    Join the NFSNET. Our prime goal is making little numbers out of big ones. http://www.nfsnet.org/

  84. Not totally. by Inoshiro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are new instructions on 486+ CPUs that are not supported on the 386. Instructions like cmpxchg8, for example. Some of these can be worked around (cmpxchg8 is used for data moving, and you can "fake it" for the locking involved with more computationally expensive instructions), but some of them cannot, and either way would require extensive work in the lowest level functions of the kernel to match the differences in the design.

    That's why most new packages you see are i486; they use instructions Intel added to the ISA when they released the 486.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Not totally. by Reziac · · Score: 2, Informative

      BTW you'll occasionally read that Win2K won't run on a 486. I can attest otherwise... one day I grabbed a HD off the junk stack, hooked it to a 486DX4-100 (with a paltry 8mb RAM) that I use as a SIMM tester, and found myself watching Win2K boot up. Ooops... It took about 4 minutes to get to the desktop, but amazingly, it was usable after that. I'd have thought at the very least it would choke on so little RAM, but apparently not.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Not totally. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Ooops... It took about 4 minutes to get to the desktop, but amazingly, it was usable after that. I'd have thought at the very least it would choke on so little RAM, but apparently not.

      I must say, I find this terribly suspicious at the very least. I can't get Windows 2000 to work on even 256MB of RAM without a swap-file, so I sure as hell can't imagine it being "responsive" with 8MB.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Not totally. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I didn't say responsive (nor did I say it had no swapfile -- I didn't check how much it used, but I expect it was plenty); I said "usable". Stuff worked, and within a reasonable timeframe; not even so bad as to rate "sluggish", tho no one would have called it "swift". I was amazed, to say the least. I'd read that with less than 32mb of physical RAM, W2K would flat refuse to even boot up.

      I don't run a swapfile with Win95 and 256+mb RAM, or with Win98/ME/2K/XP and 512+mb RAM. I've tracked usage, and when very busy with big apps, Win95 uses no more than 160mb total and the others use no more than 450mb total. Win2K is actually the leanest of that second set; even so, without a swapfile, 256mb would be pushing it, unless it was doing a fairly singleminded task that didn't create RAM-usage spikes.

      However, I have run Win95 on 8mb with no swapfile (by accident -- poor old P75 had been partially dismangled before I got it, and I didn't realise the swapfile was set to a HD that no longer existed), and oddly enough it performed much better than after I noticed the error and reset it to a partition that still existed. Ooops again!!

      Strange and bizarre are the ways of Windows :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:Not totally. by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you weren't running VirtualPC on a G4 laptop, by mistake?

    5. Re:Not totally. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      LOL! Nope, tho if you want, next time I can try emulating it on the XT ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  85. old games by ChristTrekker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's wrong with Marathon and Spectre? That's why I'm keeping around a couple of my beige Macs - a Q840AV and G3/300 to be exact. There a dozens of fan-made Marathon scenarios I have yet to play. In terms of storyline and gameplay I still think the Marathon series was the best FPS I've ever seen.

    1. Re:old games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly Mac user. Play System Shock or Deus Ex and you will quickly change your mind.

    2. Re:old games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deus Ex requires rebooting into classic to play. Or did they ever release a patch to run it in OS X?

    3. Re:old games by moonbender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Marathon's story line and telling is right up there with Deus Ex and System Shock 2. Of course, it was up there years before they were. And it was years ahead of the PC fare in technical terms, too. I keep thinking it actually had voice communication integrated into the game that changed volume depending on whether you were in the same room as the other person, although in retrospect I can't really imagine that to be true. It was also the first game I played in multiplayer using dial-up, only a couple of times though, since the only other person I could find was a long distance call away.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    4. Re:old games by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      There was voice comm in the multiplayer game, but I never actually experienced it. It broke on PPCs, and anyway, the networking model only supported AppleTalk LANs, which I never had access to.

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    5. Re:old games by mink · · Score: 1

      Why does everyone mention only SS2 when SS1 had a story and IMO atmosphere jsut as good. It just lacked the pretty graphics (but it had cyberspace).

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  86. What other old systems you have???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I though I was bad having a PowerMac 8500 and Quadra. Someone needs to have a life and need to clean out their house/garage/storeroom. Speaking of cleaning up, do you want my Quadra?

  87. That is SLOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux on modern hardware runs AT LEAST twice as fast.

  88. Not impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    In the early 1980's Forrest Howard and I produced a simulator for a PDP-10 that ran on a PDP-11 (a 36 bit machine on an 16 bit machine for those of you lacking historical context). We are talking multi-megabytes of mainframe memory simulated on a machine with 2 megabytes of memory. Yes it took a long time to run a program, but if the figures documented in the article are accurate then the programmers involved ought to be put out to pasture since they are dealing with machines with relatively the same capabilities.

  89. If only.... by syousef · · Score: 1

    If only she'd have used her powers for good instead of evil...

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  90. Gotten any job offers from Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant
    the boot screen has taken 1.5 hours to appear, and the ETA for full boot is almost exactly 1 week!

    You've achieved what they've been aiming for for years!

    1. Re:Gotten any job offers from Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony is that it really is redundant. It's something that everyone knows.

  91. Power Requirements by FIGJAM · · Score: 1

    What kind of UPS would you need?

    --
    Do your best, hope for the best, suspect the worst.
  92. 25Mhz * 500 = 12,500 by magarity · · Score: 1

    Hey, I just had a flash! Why not emulate a 12.5Ghz 68040? Then it would run at regular 68040 speeds!

    1. Re:25Mhz * 500 = 12,500 by reverius · · Score: 1

      because that 500x slowdown is not on the "emulated" processor (the speed of which is determined by your own processor, you don't just set it). so if you had a 12.5 ghz processor and a 68k emulator with a 500x slowdown, yes, you'd be emulating a 25 mhz 68k.

      if you could arbitrarily set the CPU speed of your emulated processor, why not make it 10 billion ghz, and have the fastest cpu ever! yeah, that's a great idea!

    2. Re:25Mhz * 500 = 12,500 by magarity · · Score: 1

      Sometime try to notice how some jokes just aren't funny if you explain them.

  93. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's NOT an early 90's machine. The CPU might be, but it should have around 4-8 MB RAM and a couple of hundred, maybe 100-200 MB of disk space if it was supposed to be an early 90's PC.

  94. I'll be the first to say... by Laebshade · · Score: 1

    it probably boots faster than Gentoo compiles :P

    1. Re:I'll be the first to say... by CoolGopher · · Score: 1
      Hell, universes live and die in the time Gentoo compiles. And I like Gentoo! :)
      (except when I realized that the hardening use flag resulted in a non-working X.org, and I needed a working X the next day...)

      I have karma to burn, thankfully ;-)

  95. I bet by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Funny

    that this guy goes homicidal if his power goes out on Sunday night.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:I bet by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      He would, except he's a she. Ah, geek grrl of my dreams. Plays with Macs and Linux, and likes abusing old hardware. Too bad she's in Oz.

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  96. Re:Quality material on Slashdot? Since when? by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    Slashdot has always covered stories about insane/inane hacks. In fact I think its hard to find any "quality story material" on /. Try "quit slashdot.org" at www.cs.washington.edu/homes/klee/misc/slashdot.htm l

  97. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, simulate a beowulf cluster on it.

  98. Not bad for wasting some free time. by recharged95 · · Score: 1
    Well it does show how flexible the OS X kernel is. That their implementation of expected OS algorithms (timing, threading, mem management, I/O, etc...) are likely based on solid concepts and since computing is reflective (i.e. mathematical ;) ), does imply that good software should be "backward" and "forwards" compatible with the change in hardware.

    I consider it good news that the OS X core will have a long lifespan and get better in the future.

    Try running any other OS on an older computer, via emulation or not. Yes they could have been faster and better for specific tasks/hardware, but as computers get more common (e.g. new users) the need for flexiblilty/commonality will be more important. That's why we all still use a No. 2 pencil!

  99. wasn't meant to be user serviceable by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    I found the 650 a whole lot easier than many Compaq boxes. It was also very solid and sturdy. An obnoxious design would be something that breaks often and easily. Perhaps by Mac standards it was difficult, but there is much worse in the PC world

  100. Hmmm..... by The+Foo · · Score: 0

    Well, its certainly interesting. I can't imagine trying to download porn.

    --
    http://www.macinhack.com
  101. An Excellent Demonstration of Church-Turing... by borgheron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is an excellent demonstration of the Church-Turing hypothesis.

    Boiled down, it basically states that any computer can emulate any other. :)

    GJC

    --
    Gregory Casamento
    ## Chief Maintainer for GNUstep
    1. Re:An Excellent Demonstration of Church-Turing... by istewart · · Score: 2, Funny

      And 25 years from now, my IIgs will have finally reached the Apple-logo boot screen.

      Maybe by the time I'm ready to retire it will have finally rendered a single frame of the OS X logo.

    2. Re:An Excellent Demonstration of Church-Turing... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      You know, that explains President Bush. It's not that he's slow. He's in emulation mode.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    3. Re:An Excellent Demonstration of Church-Turing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that was a theorem (proved mathematically) rather than a hypothesis. Any computer can emulate any other - if there are no limits on time or memory. (Turing's model computer used an eraseable tape of limitless size.)

  102. I find it interesting... by jwind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No really, I do. Maybe i just increased my nerd factor exponentially, but there is something to be said for a OS that's boot from a machine with 64mb of ram. OSX whole claim to fame is it's stability.

  103. Re:Wow by raodin · · Score: 1

    It's NOT an early 90's machine. The CPU might be, but it should have around 4-8 MB RAM and a couple of hundred, maybe 100-200 MB of disk space if it was supposed to be an early 90's PC.

    Yes it is.. the Centris machines were all released in 1993. They shipped with around 4mb of RAM and 120 or 240mb HDs (and a CD-ROM, if you were feeling rich), if I recall. Obviously its been upgraded, but that doesn't mean its not an early 90s machine.

  104. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool! This will be useful for when I have to VNC from a black hole.

  105. Maybe she was high? by Crackez · · Score: 1

    Seriously, one time me and my buddy got high and compiled a pdp11 emulator and ran AT&T Version 6 Unix on... get this... A Sun SparcStation IPC.

    The box has 24MB of RAM, a 25MHz SPARC CPU, and a 411MB SCSI disk. I think the pdp11 we setup had 256k words (512kb) of ram. PDP11 Unix took a long time to boot too, around 15 minutes. Pegged the real cpu at 99% the whole time the emulator was running. For comparison, booting was instantaneous on a 2.4 GHz Xeon.

    The part that was really funny was when we found the source code sitting in /usr on the disk image. Pre-K&R C, using stuff like =+ instead of +=... We were laughing our asses off. Not sure now why it was so funny...

    Btw, it was running on NetBSD 1.6.1/SPARC...

    Hey it was funny to us... Tell me you haven't done anything stupid when you were high!

  106. Gotta wonder if by Nybble's+Byte · · Score: 0

    Microsoft will hold this up as an example of how much faster Windows is than Linux...or at least how much faster it reboots.

  107. Re:boot times- by xtermin8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually I beleive the difference between Centris and Quadra was more marketing than technology. They were essentially the same machine. Boot times on the 68xxx apples could be improved by putting system files on a ram disk, which was a virtual disk maintained by AppleRom. Great featuer

  108. Re:Wow by kayen_telva · · Score: 0

    that was his point

  109. Re:Wow by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 0

    That doesn't mean the license clause isn't BS.

  110. I'm not impressed by Paladeen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hah!

    0.05Mhz? That's just plain speedy. I'd like to see them do what I did: Run it on a 0Mhz processor:

  111. overclocked abacus? by dpeltzm1 · · Score: 1

    does 2 extra rows of beads make it IPV6 ready ;-)

  112. rcpt to: psychotic_fuck@appletalk.com.au by Lethyos · · Score: 1

    subject: you sick fuck
    data: you are my hero. keep it up!
    .

    --
    Why bother.
  113. Hmm, I had a Centris 610 from '93 - '97 or so... by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

    And it came with a whopping 8 megs of ram, and an 80 MB hard drive. Then I got a 100 meg zip drive so I could have more room... Had lots of fun downloading pr0n files from a unix account that gave access to usenet via gopher. Using a 14.4k z-modem connection and pasting uuencoded segments together with MS Word, uudecoding the pasted together jpeg file, the reward for 45 minutes downloading was illicit jack off material. For a 15 year old that looked 13, it was easier than buying a magazine. What a teenager will do for jack off material..... Still, I could read alot of the alt.sex.stories while I waited for the images to download... The centris was a 68040. 20-ish mhz? Never heard of a 68040 w/64 megs of ram and a 4 gig hard drive...

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  114. 0.05MHz? by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    I don't think I want to know what happens when you try to install or update fink on that machine...

    If my calculations are correct then when you run another Debian emulated on top of the Mac OS X Panther, which itself runs under PearPC on the underlying Debian, then when you run apt-get dist-upgrade there is already a new stable version of Debian released.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:0.05MHz? by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Oww.

      That hurt to think about.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  115. 0.05MHz = 50kHz by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    It is interesting to note that 0.05MHz = 50kHz which means that you can basically use your powerline socket as a cheap source of clock signal connected directly to your CPU. Be careful with 60Hz overclocking, though. Also, watercooling such a setup is generally not recommended.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  116. What in the name of falling blocks do I do? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Know what I do with a Centris? I play Tetris!

    1. Re:What in the name of falling blocks do I do? by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Go get an Intellivision and play 4-Tris. ;-)

      --Joe
    2. Re:What in the name of falling blocks do I do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're a real RETARDIS MAXIMIS.

  117. What else can we run OS X on? by LordRPI · · Score: 1

    I somehow think running OS X on an iPod would be more useful. Besides, how big were the hard drives back when the Centris machines were out? Certainly no bigger than 500MB. Did they even get up to 128MB of RAM?

  118. AAGGLL Re:Not totally. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll say it again:
    You've got issues with your Win2K install.
    I have Win2k running on:
    Pentium 133/80megs
    K6-III 450/320megs
    PIII 400/192megs
    Pentium 200/64megs

    ALL are VERY usable, and only the P200/64 uses swap in daily use (web/mail/word.)

  119. Your Mac boots up in what, a day and a half? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

    You're the bigest joke on the Internet
    I could back up your whole hard drive on a floppy diskette.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  120. embarrased... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because you know Latin, or because you know your Monty Python. Never be embarrassed for knowing your Monty Python.

  121. Centris vs. Quadra by beavis88 · · Score: 1

    The Centris used the 68040LC processor (with no floating point unit); the Quadra used the full-fledged '040.

    1. Re:Centris vs. Quadra by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1
      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  122. Finally, an overclocking argument! by linoleumcp · · Score: 1

    Amazing, overclocking finally makes sense! Overclocking the Centris could cut a day and a half off the boot time! Beat that AMD and Intel boyz!

  123. HE'S MAD!! AAAHHAHHAHAH!! MAD I TELL YOU! by macguiguru · · Score: 0

    Ah. But what devine madness tis. Onward lads! Into the dark! (smiles and imagines that bouncy young woman from 1984)

  124. Re:wow by burns210 · · Score: 1

    I did.

  125. Very simple answer... by sokoban · · Score: 1

    because

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
  126. I have a G4 400 AGP by ellem · · Score: 1

    with similar benchmarks!

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  127. Re:And in other news, I sat and watched plaster dr by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

    That's excellent.

    When you get tired of squinting at it, Exposé comes in very handy for scaling it down.

    Heh. They just captured R2D2.

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  128. Re:Hmm, I had a Centris 610 from '93 - '97 or so.. by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

    The 610 had a 25Mhz chip. And, yes, 8MB RAM and an 80MB HD were standard, but this beast could take up to 68MB of RAM (64 via SIMM, 4 on board) It will take any SCSI drive, as long as it has a 50-pin connector. (I have an even more ancient circa-1989 SE/30 with 128MB of RAM, and a 9GB (10,000 RPM, even,) drive in it running Debian.)

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  129. I don't want to start a holy war here, by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny
    but what is the deal with you OS X fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Centris with 68MB RAM, a 25MHz 68040 and 4GB drive for about 2 months now while it attempts to copy a 17 Meg file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder. 2 months. At home, on my C64 w/ 64k of RAM running Contiki, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this lickable OS, the same operation would take about 3 days, if that.

    In addition, during this file transfer, Safari will not work. And everything else has ground to a halt. Even Textedit is straining to keep up as I type this.

    I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working on various OS X machines, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen a OS X machine that has run faster than its Contiki counterpart, despite the thousands of lines of code stolen from Windows Longhorn. My Tandy 102 with 32k of ram and MS BASIC runs faster than this 25 mhz machine at times. From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that OS X is a superior OS.

    OS X addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use OS X over other faster, cheaper, more stable OSes.

    1. Re: I don't want to start a holy war here, by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      Good parody! That's pretty much how the anti-Apple brigade expresses itself.

    2. Re: I don't want to start a holy war here, by ky11x · · Score: 1

      Awesome post. You have made my day.

    3. Re: I don't want to start a holy war here, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > My Tandy 102 with 32k of ram and MS BASIC runs faster than this 25 mhz machine at times

      I love you.

      +1 model 100 reference, my friend

  130. So what? Beat this: by Crass+Spektakel · · Score: 1

    I have been using Debian for years on my Amiga3000, 030/25, 16MB Fast-RAM, CL5424-Gfx-Board, 1GB-SCSI-HD.

    It runs acceptable and you can actually use some modern software instead of waiting a week to boot.

    I should finally try Firefox and Thunderbird on that old rusty ship :-)

    --
    "Life is short and in most cases it ends with death." Sir Sinclair
  131. Running Windows on the Earth MegaComputer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now we finally discover why the Earth supercomputer took billions of years to (almost) complete the program before it was demolished to make way for a hypergalactic expressway ...

    Quote from a windows user waiting for it to boot: "The first ten million years were the worst,and the second ten million years, they were the worst too. The third million years I didn't enjoy at all. After that I went into a bit of decline."

  132. Because I could (and had a day to spare) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the same reason that I installed the Intel version of Rhapsody on VPC 3 running on my 200MHz 8600, just to see

  133. Enquiring minds want to know! Does it emulate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ... that really cool feature where when the OS hangs, you get to pry your floppy disk out with a paperclip, due to lack of an eject button?

    *ducks*
    *runs*
    *trips over a box full of one-button mice*
    *gets up and continues running*

  134. RSS Feed? by F.O.Dobbs · · Score: 1

    This seems like a logical candidate for an RSS feed. Maybe once or twice a week there could be an update (ie. "Configuring Network").

  135. Aleph One by interactive_civilian · · Score: 3, Informative
    For those Marathon fans who don't want to keep around a lot of old equipment, head over to source.bungie.org and download Aleph One, which is the updated Marathon engine. It should work just fine with your Marathon 2 and Infinity files. Then you can go here and get all of your Marathon 1 goodness for Aleph One.

    cheers. :)

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
    1. Re:Aleph One by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      You are my new best friend. I had no idea this was out there. I'm downloading it right now. I don't have to reboot my 6400 in OS 8 just to play Marathon now.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    2. Re:Aleph One by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      If you like it, please consider joining the project and giving us a hand. (I'm the guy who does the nightly builds.) We're in dire need of more coders.

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    3. Re:Aleph One by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      I can't get there right now. (Dang corporate web filter.) I remember reading about Aleph One quite some time ago, when I was looking for new Marathon scenarios. What is it? If it lets me run Marathon in OS X I'll be thrilled - Classic doesn't like 1 or Infinity, and 2 is the weakest of the three. If it does that and still networks to players with the original Marathons I'll be truly ecstatic.

    4. Re:Aleph One by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      I'd love to be able to help, but my time is consumed already. Hooda thunk that a wife/kids/house would take so much time?

      Since I can't get to any of the sites now because of this darn corporate web filter...Aleph One (slick name by the way - chuckles from this math geek) is an OSS implementation of the Marathon's game engine? Made more multi-platform, so I can play natively in OS X? Still using original data files, so I can play all the existing scenarios? Still networkable with those playing the original Marathons? I don't know any of the features, but it sounds pretty cool.

      Was any Marathon ever internet-aware, or was it strictly LAN? Dang it's been too long since I've played!

    5. Re:Aleph One by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      Let's see. OK, in order:

      A1 (as we call it) is the OSS project built on the Marathon 2 engine. Right before being sucked into the Black Pit of Redmond, Bungie GPL'd Marathon 2.

      Large chunks of the code have been redesigned to use various SDL libraries, enabling native play on Linux, Win32, hell, BeOS, as well as X-based play on OS X. The OS X carbon port is different branch of the code, and actually the primary one being maintained.

      A1 can read Marathon 2 and Marathon Infinity map/shape/sound/whatever files. It cannot read Marathon 1, but there are various tools available to automate the conversion process, as well as an significant number of maps hand-converted (including all of Marathon 1 itself, as the M1A1 project). Furthermore, A1 now supports hi-res substitute textures, of which there are many, as well as providing limited support for replacing sprites with 3D models.

      A1 is not networkable with the original games. It's not even generally networkable with prior versions of itself. :)

      M1/M2/Minf were strictly AppleTalk LAN games. M2/win had an IPX mode. Towards the end of the OS 9 days, there was a AppleTalk-TCP/IP bridge tool that some people used to successfully play networked games over the internet, but from what I heard, it was horribly laggy. Marathon's original networking model was ring-style and assumed perfect conditions (0ms ping, 0% loss), and it had very little tolerance for real-world conditions as found on the 'net at large. A1's networking has been overhauled into a modern star network that can handle the internet much better.

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    6. Re:Aleph One by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      Sweeeeeeeet. I will give it a try (hopefully soon). It may convince me to give you guys a hand. ;) What kind of help (specifically) are you looking for? If you have a help-wanted page, a link is fine.

      For some reason I thought this big Marathon rework was a port to a different game engine, so you had to buy that game to play it with. Maybe that was a different project I'd read about once.

      to use various SDL libraries, enabling native play on Linux, Win32, hell, BeOS, as well as X-based play on OS X.

      I have no idea what SDL is or why this is significant. I've never programmed GUIs except baby Java stuff in class.

      The OS X carbon port is different branch of the code, and actually the primary one being maintained.

      Cool. That's the one I probably want to try then. I assume the backend stuff is still the same though, so it can network play with the Lin/Win/etc people?

      Furthermore, A1 now supports hi-res substitute textures, of which there are many, as well as providing limited support for replacing sprites with 3D models.

      I'll have to check out the site from home, a lot of this is probably already explained there, so I appreciate your time to post it for the slashdot crowd (like me). Are these optional from within the game configuration? Do you just drop in a different data file? How's that done?

      A1 is not networkable with the original games.

      Is there a build for the classic MacOS? If not, I probably don't have to bother keeping my old Macs around (which was the original point of this thread).

      Again, if you have FAQs explaining this stuff, links are fine. I'll try to follow up on all this from home sometime when game sites aren't blocked.

    7. Re:Aleph One by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      Again, point by point...

      There is some (limited) documentation on the project, but most of it is badly out of date (as always :)). The main site for the effort is source.bungie.org; there is also our SF project page, where you can join the developers' mailing list. That's really the best way to get involved. BTW, what sort of coding experience do you have? We need pretty much everything--engine, networking, UI, etc. Do you know anything about coding for Carbon or Cocoa? The engine is in C and C++, if that's relevant.

      There is a project called "Marathon|Rampancy" to port the maps/sprites to Unreal Tournament, which is probably what you were thinking of.

      SDL is the Simple DirectMedia Layer, a set of multimedia libraries for sound, 2D and 3D graphics, keyboard/mouse, etc., which is used in a lot of open source programs.

      The hi-res and 3D substitutes are controlled via an XML language called MML, the Marathon Markul Language, which tells the engine to replace with what.

      There were builds for classic, but they haven't really been kept up. The last build is over a year and a half old, and I have no idea if the classic maintainer is still working with us.

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
  136. Don't mince words... by interactive_civilian · · Score: 2, Funny
    Lord Kano said:
    Why?

    Read the damned article you lazy motherfucker.

    Now, don't be shy. Say what you really mean to say. ;p
    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
  137. omgfarkroflozlzlzlwtfbbw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd hit it with a wiffle ball bat.

  138. Re:And in other news, I sat and watched plaster dr by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

    *sigh*

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  139. Makes One Wonder by wildsurf · · Score: 1

    What kind of OS would require a full week to boot on CURRENT hardware...

    Oh yeah. It's called Longhorn.

    --
    Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
  140. Re:And in other news, I sat and watched plaster dr by skabb · · Score: 1

    I admit, after I read the article, I turned my head towards my old Amiga sitting lonely in the corner which was humming along while idling in the m68k -linux kernel, hmmm.... OS-X?

    Then I turned back, "nah..., I got other things to do." (I swear that I heard a relieved "phew..." just then)

  141. You think thats bad by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    I had an english paper to write on a 286 running win 3.1 it was due the next day. Sent all 20 pages to the ancient dot matrix printer. Thought I'd come out fine as it was 3 am and school didn't start until 7:45 am. So I sat and waited as the hours went by. It finally finished with the last page at 3 pm. Why, I don't know. Never knew if it was a hardware problem ( the hardrive controller was on the fritz), the software ( el cheapo bargin bin $5 Easy Working Word Processor), the Printer Cable ( are the individual wires in a parallel cable supposed to be exposed without insulater?) or printer. Luckily I got an extention. But Believe me that whole computer system paid for its insolence at a later date. Everclear has to be the coolest thing ever.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  142. Aha. Now I know who... by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 1

    the *other* windows developer trying to use 1.02/.03
    was...

  143. Titor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Titor The Time Traveler

  144. and so...... by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

    I'm on the run... the cop got my gun... but right about now it's time to have some FUN!

    /just saw the Beastie Boys on Saturday.

  145. why I care by SethJohnson · · Score: 1



    This is an especially relevant accomplishment for the thousands of people, like myself, who have been using LI/Unix on Macintosh hardware for the last 8 or so years. Historically, there has been a huge dividing line over which few Linux distros crossed. In fact, none did. AIX (not Linux), A/UX (also not linux), NetBSD and MkLinux were the only things you could ever run on the nubus Macs. This included the early powerPC and also 68k hardware. Then the PCI powermacs came out and all the Linux distros like Yellow Dog, SuSE, and the such were ported. But MkLinux and the nubus BSD stuff never came accross this chasm to PCI, nor did the PCI Linux distros backport to nubus. Interest in the nubus distros diminished on the development front because coders wanted to apply their time and skills to working on the distros running on the faster hardware. And of course, Apple was never going to waste a penny of development on getting Mac OS X to run on hardware that didn't mean new hardware sales.

    So to those of us who can remember the brick wall of owning nubus hardware and wanting to run a modern Unix on it, this is an astonishing moment.

  146. But I am not! by DimGeo · · Score: 1

    erm... whatever...

  147. /. effect? Use Coral by Internet+Ninja · · Score: 1

    The site was b0rked so coral to the rescue.
    Read it here.

    More info coral at the homepage

  148. Re:Wow by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure the CD ROM was standard. Apple made a big push for CD ROM as standard equipment around this time. Today it's almost hard to believe that it was cutting about a dozen years ago.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  149. had to be said by frz · · Score: 1

    imagine a beowulf cluster of these...

    --
    open source is a cancer (steve ballmer) we love open source (steve jobs)
  150. MOD parent UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the man is right, help prevent misinformation from spreading, we get enough of that from CNN and Faux News

  151. What you need next...... by Geoffers · · Score: 1

    Ubber geek points for actually doing this, now we just need to get it running directly [without emulation] on a nice opteron box and watch the x-serves cough in our dust :\

  152. Re:Wow by raodin · · Score: 1

    I've got a Centris sitting around somewhere (610 I think) with a blank faceplate over the 5-1/4" bay, so they were definately available without. I'm fairly certain the CD-ROM was standard with the first gen PPCs though.

  153. Twenty Years Ago by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1
    I actually used (for fun and profit) my Atari ST with 1MB RAM to emulate a PC (33% of the 8 MHz clock) and ran ProComm with a script to capture transactions via 2400 baud modem from a fueling center in a nearby town. Can't remember the name of the emulator.

    The process - albeit pokey - ran flawlessly, and was used as a backup to the crap Comm library we'd bought to do it within FoxBase. Yes, I said FoxBase. Pre-M$.

    Fond Memories Indeed.

    To be also noted was that the same script choked on a 286-12 clone when deployed onsite at the fuel company's site, so it was back to the coding room...got it working somehow.

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
  154. What we need is NeXTPostFacto by argent · · Score: 1

    Instead of booting OS X on an emulator, the real trick would be to get NeXTstep booting native using OpenDarwin on a 68040 Mac. I'll bet it'll run faster than OS X did on my 7500.

  155. Meh by Shinaku · · Score: 1

    No no no no no,

    What you want is:
    OS X - in PearPC - In Dreamcast Linux - On Chankast!

    oh screw it, run it on a 386dx/33

    --
    -- :>
  156. Simple solution by stud9920 · · Score: 0

    Simple solution to the responsivity problem : buy a 1 ton mouse.

  157. Now you can convert your old mac.. ah nm.. by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Points for the most pointless geek project of all time? I think next month they should try and overclock it. With all the latest heat-sink technology you could probably get that OSX atleast as usable as the average XP machine with tons of spyware.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  158. System 6 Emulator by edac2 · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see a test of running System 6 in emulation on a G5 to see how FAST it is.

    1. Re:System 6 Emulator by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      I believe both vMac and Basilisk II will run System 6. Both have OS X versions.

      If they just carbonized System 7.1 so it could run on a G5, that would be sweet. In many ways 7.1 was the "sweet spot" of the MacOS prior to X. Decent features, pretty stable, little bloat. It would run most any Mac app written up to that point, and with just a few extra extensions it could run many apps written in the OS 8 and 9 days too.

  159. ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    demonstrates the never ending stupidity of mac lusers

  160. Re:Hmm, I had a Centris 610 from '93 - '97 or so.. by psergiu · · Score: 1

    610 can have up to 132Mb of ram - 4 onboard+2*64Mb. It works, i have an 100Mb (4+64+32) Quadra 610 at home happily running A/UX.

    --
    1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
  161. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.

  162. Oh, Great! by GammaRay+Rob · · Score: 1

    Another story about how slow those Apples are!

    --
    This line no sig
  163. Re:And in other news, I sat and watched plaster dr by jandrese · · Score: 1

    Worse, it appears to be a perl script. I don't know if it actually works though, I'm afraid to test it out.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  164. choose the right WM by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

    Using iceWM on my SE/30 (NetBSD) is tolerable for light work. Mostly I just have a couple xterms open (they nearly overlap on the tiny screen) so I generally use screen/dt instead and skip X. Blackbox might have shown a bit of an improvement but I couldn't get the latest version to compile.

  165. Centris vs Quadra--distinction not the CPU by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

    The C610 had a 20MHz LC040, the C650 used a 25MHz full '040.

    All the Quadras used the full '040 except the Q605 and Q630, which used 25MHz and 33MHz LC040s respectively.

  166. Re:Hmm, I had a Centris 610 from '93 - '97 or so.. by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

    Ah, that's right. For some reason, I thought it only had one RAM slot.

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  167. Think about this by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If my calculations are correct then when you run another Debian emulated on top of the Mac OS X Panther, which itself runs under PearPC on the underlying Debian, then when you run apt-get dist-upgrade there is already a new stable version of Debian released.

    Oww. That hurt to think about.

    Oh, really? Than you should think about this:

    The best compliment I've gotten for CPR is when my ActiveState coworker Adam Turoff said, "I feel like my head has just been wrapped around a brick". I hope this next example makes you feel that way too:

    #!/usr/bin/cpr
    int main(void) {
    CPR_eval("use Inline (C => q{
    char* greet() {
    return \"Hello world\";
    }
    })");
    printf("%s, I'm running under Perl version %s\n",
    CPR_eval("&greet"),
    CPR_eval("use Config; $Config{version}"));
    return 0;
    }

    Running this program prints:

    Hello world, I'm running under Perl version 5.6.0

    Using the eval() call this CPR program calls Perl and tells it to use Inline C to add a new function, which the CPR program subsequently calls. I think I have a headache myself.

    (from Pathologically Polluting Perl by Brian Ingerson)

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted! Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters. Hopefully my explanation will dilute those "junk characters" and will let me post this comment. It's interesting that this lame filter stops me from quoting programs but doesn't stop anyone from posting full-screen ASCII-art swastikas and pornography. But anyway...

    Thanks to the Inline module, it is possible to include fragments of C code in Perl programs. You can write part of your Perl program in C (for example one speed-critical subroutine) and it is automatically compiled to native binary machine code and linked as a shared object (see this comment of mine and read the paragraph starting from "Actually, inlining other languages..."). CPR stands for "C Perl Run." From the description:

    Is it C? Is it Perl? It's neither, it's both. It's CPR! CPR (C Perl Run) is a "new language" that looks like C. You don't need to compile it. You just run it, much like Perl. As an added bonus, you'll get access to the full internals of Perl via the CPR API. The idea is that you just put a CPR hashbang at the top of your C program and run it like a script. The CPR interpreter will run your C code under Perl.

    In other words, CPR program is a C program which is run by Perl, just as if it was a C code inlined in a Perl program.

    Now, in this case, the C program I quoted (which is itself run by Perl), includes a Perl code inlined in C by CPR_eval(). What is inside that inlined Perl code is an inlined C code (use Inline...) which is a C function greet() that returns a C pointer to C string "Hello world". The next part of the original (outermost) C program is a C printf() function printing two C strings. Those C strings, arguments to printf(), are returned by two invocations of CPR_eval(), both of which inline Perl code. The second one just returns Perl interpreter version, but the first one is more interesting. The first CPR_eval() returns a C string to printf() which is converted from a Perl string returned by the Perl code inlined in that CPR_eval(), which is a call to Perl greet() subroutine which was defined earlier by the C function inlined in the Perl code inlined in the C code by the first CPR_eval() invocation. It all happen inside a C main() fu

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:Think about this by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      *twitch*

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  168. Barebones Ladies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's been one week since you booted me,
    Flipped the switch and disk spinning

    Five days since the startup screen,
    Progress meter slow-oh-ly filling

    Three days since the screen turned blue...
    You thought this was Windows, Ha! I fooled you.

    Yesterday, you stayed up waiting for me
    But you're crazy if you think you're playing Quake 3.

  169. Re:Wow by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    You're correct, I think. You jogged my memory, and I remember that on the Centris 610s we had at work, there was no CD-ROM. Shortly thereafter, I bought a Centris 650 that I thought came with the CD ROM as standard, but I'm probably not remembering correctly.

    Shit. . . I'm trying to picture those 610s in my mind to confirm, and I'm having trouble. I did a lot of drugs in those days. Let that be a lesson to you kids!

    Maybe it was the Performa my sister bought about a year later that had the CD ROM as standard. Well, whatever. Thanks for the correction.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  170. Try it on an Apple ][e by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

    Now if she could somehow find a distro of Linux that runs on an Apple ][e, somehow compile PearPC for the 6502, and run OS X on *that*, then I would be truly impressed. :) Since the 6502 runs at 1MHz, we're talking 0.002MHz or a 2 *KiloHertz* G3, so it would probably take years to boot....

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  171. Great by sorcium · · Score: 0

    Now how long until that machine is on the internet?

  172. And for her next trick by LochNess · · Score: 1

    she will boot it on a TRS-80!

  173. The excitement comes from by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

    The excitement comes from "she's"

    nuff said

  174. Speaking of this... by Sunnan · · Score: 1

    Is there an "operating system" that's developed specifically for abacuses?

    I mean specific methods/modes of operation. Good abacus "software".

  175. Zzzz. by mooncaine · · Score: 1

    Zzz. Boring story, boring idea in the first place.

  176. coding contributions to A1 by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1
    BTW, what sort of coding experience do you have? We need pretty much everything--engine, networking, UI, etc. Do you know anything about coding for Carbon or Cocoa? The engine is in C and C++, if that's relevant.

    Mainly web development (which is about as far from event-driven GUI stuff as is possible - my college roomie veldrane is the game programmer). C, C++, J2EE. A little ASP thrown in. I always wanted to develop on the Mac, but never had time to dig into it. Finally sold my old (unused) dev tools about two years ago. Of course, my new OS X Mac has all the dev tools a guy could want.

    I do own Irix and NetBSD boxen, though, if contributions of native builds on those platforms would be of interest. How hard has it been to build on multiple platforms?

    There is a project called "Marathon|Rampancy" to port the maps/sprites to Unreal Tournament, which is probably what you were thinking of.

    Probably...

    There were builds for classic, but they haven't really been kept up.

    And since I sold my copy of CodeWarrior, I wouldn't be able to do it anymore.

    1. Re:coding contributions to A1 by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      The meat-and-bones of a FPS (or really any game) isn't so much about event-loop GUI coding, the way, frex, a word processor is. It's in the state tracking and physical behavior of all the inhabitants of the game world. Any user input is almost incidental; games are really more like simulation software than anything else.

      Nobody's been particularly interested in having binary builds available for the *nix platforms. The idea is that anyone who wants to game on *nix can be assumed to know how to compile something for himself. The SDL side of the code (the build for Linux, etc.) is organized along GNU principles--autogen, configure/make, etc. So to sum up, your systems would be good testbeds for ensuring that A1 will compile on them.

      I think the OS 9 build was done in codewarrior, so probably not.

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    2. Re:coding contributions to A1 by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1
      So to sum up, your systems would be good testbeds for ensuring that A1 will compile on them.

      Less platform dependency is generally a good thing. :) I'll try to give it a whirl and post on the dev list how it goes.