Putting man on the moon for 3 days is NOT that hard. It was that NASA planned it, and CONgress funded it, allowing them to get it done.
I'm not going to downplay the role of the planning and funding, but I think you don't have the whole picture. I have some suggested reading. This book almost entirely ignores the astronauts themselves and focuses on the scientists, engineers, and administrators who got them there and back,
I think slashdot put my reply onto the wrong post, yours was not who i was replying to. There were a few missing words on the one I was replying to making it totally unintelligible.
The problem here is you are saying "The properway" - as if there is only one acceptable way to do it. You're not omnipotent, just because you have experience in the matter does not make every other method wrong.
The idea is you seal the product then kill the microbes. Thus it isn't spoiling as there is nothing in there to want to eat it. Break the seal and it would spoil just as fast.
Slashdot Mirror
He's stating the first part, and implying the second.
How did you not understand that?
Lobster is bad enough, but frozen lobster? That sounds... like it brings disgusting to a whole new level.
newsflash: product is cheaper where it is locally available
Not a bad idea...
Might end up doing that. Claim that self-dependency I never do, and mail them what I get back on my return.
Aahhh I just got it! It was Cipher, in The Matrix.
+1 if I hadn't already posted.
Where is this from, anyway? I remember the conversation but can't place it.
Hmm, it seems the universe has a constant random seed...
That's an understatement.
First it has to match up to it's current velocity... and then it has to overtake the 40-year lead.
I wish there was a "for NASA" field you could fill out on your tax return, to send some extra money their way voluntarily.
Putting man on the moon for 3 days is NOT that hard. It was that NASA planned it, and CONgress funded it, allowing them to get it done.
I'm not going to downplay the role of the planning and funding, but I think you don't have the whole picture. I have some suggested reading. This book almost entirely ignores the astronauts themselves and focuses on the scientists, engineers, and administrators who got them there and back,
People need to stop mentioning their name. It only feeds them.
Isn't that supposed to be the job of the other executive-levels?
Well, I'm no expert either but I agree this is all just silly semantics. What was the point again?
Why not? It has trace amounts of chemicals in it.
I think slashdot put my reply onto the wrong post, yours was not who i was replying to. There were a few missing words on the one I was replying to making it totally unintelligible.
Yes, because a teaspoon of sugar in a whole loaf is really all that much... Hyperbole much?
Sounds like friendship bread I'd imagine.
That's why we have these interesting procedures called 'food preparation.'
I think you mean a theoretical vacuum... which is called theoretical for a reason.
What, you think your homemade bread doesn't have any chemicals in it?
Everything is chemicals.
The problem here is you are saying "The properway" - as if there is only one acceptable way to do it. You're not omnipotent, just because you have experience in the matter does not make every other method wrong.
Why is it any different than ingesting the spores and letting your digestive acids/enzymes kill them?
The idea is you seal the product then kill the microbes. Thus it isn't spoiling as there is nothing in there to want to eat it. Break the seal and it would spoil just as fast.
The "sugar" is still in there, or what did you think the flour was made out of?
... a what?