If it was a millimeter scanner, most likely there was resonance with circuit trace(s). A resonance in the right spot (input to an opamp for example) and you could say further operation is undefined.
Electrical devices like that are full of amplifiers and things like field-effect transistors - things that take small changes in, and output much (relatively) larger ones.
It doesn't take much interference at all to cause problems, and this is made even worse that circuit traces etc can be resonant (where you most certainly will not) with the incoming interference, making things worse.
In my case I always do opt out. I've been asked why a few times - and in every case I've said (and this is partial truth) "I work around radio a lot, so I try to keep any of my exposures to a minimum". The "lie" is that I operate occasionally.
Every single time I've said this, it's been accepted with no fuss.
... and also have the ship driving into the expected wave direction most of the time. It's when these huge waves hit the side or rear of a ship that problems occur, isn't it? I admit I have a very large lack of experience here.
I wish Texas would just go secede already, and that the federal government would just let them. Nothing of value would be lost, and most of those silly patent trolls would go with them.
They do? I thought, in Spanish, that you speak that "M" with your lips (as in English) and the "C" with your tongue (like a shortened S). Totally different sound structure.
I'm pretty sure we should all just foe Lunix Nutcase (the name should be a clue) and make sure our "Viewing" settings are set to show Foes with a -6 modifier.
... and just so you know, since I just know you are going to say it: you're now on my foe list so slashdot shows you as -1 for me, and I don't have to read your shit ever again. Nothing personal, and it's not meant to be trite.
We are all allowed to have them and they do not have to jive. STOP FUCKING ATTACKING PEOPLE'S OPINIONS. State your case and move on. If you have to go "nyu ah you're wrong so there" then you're doing it wrong.
That's not a thing. But I know what you are saying.
I respectfully disagree. Would you argue that the 802.3 has nothing to do with the internet? You'll notice that wireless and traditional ethernet are all underneath 802, which includes such gems as the standards that govern cable modems? It's all one family, and arguably this family forms the backbone of the internet (in a figurative sense, not the literal). They should all be open. This is an opinion. You are allowed to disagree. You are not likely to convince me otherwise.
Slashdot Mirror
You were "told?"? You just say "I want to opt out."
They may ask why. Just tell them. They can't refuse because they don't think it's a good reason.
If it was a millimeter scanner, most likely there was resonance with circuit trace(s). A resonance in the right spot (input to an opamp for example) and you could say further operation is undefined.
Electrical devices like that are full of amplifiers and things like field-effect transistors - things that take small changes in, and output much (relatively) larger ones.
It doesn't take much interference at all to cause problems, and this is made even worse that circuit traces etc can be resonant (where you most certainly will not) with the incoming interference, making things worse.
Aah, I see.
In my case I always do opt out. I've been asked why a few times - and in every case I've said (and this is partial truth) "I work around radio a lot, so I try to keep any of my exposures to a minimum". The "lie" is that I operate occasionally.
Every single time I've said this, it's been accepted with no fuss.
Wait a minute... I think the larger issue here is that they forced her through the scanner.
Maybe I'm wrong, but is that not improper? I thought they had to allow manual inspection at your request.
Sorry, my funny bone doesn't spontaneously activate. The material has to actually be funny.
Yep. Because you are omnipotent and know what I do for a living, and know that it is nonproductive. I'm sure that's how it works.
Hint: you are not imnipotent, you do NOT know what I do for a living, and it IS productive.
Some of us care about things even if we don't work with them as part of our jobs.
Encapsulate HTTP requests into something like PACTOR III to a terrestrial station serving as a gateway. Not a difficult idea.
It would be amusing to see Somali pirates trying to pass the Panama Canal or the Horn of Africa in their little boats :)
... and also have the ship driving into the expected wave direction most of the time. It's when these huge waves hit the side or rear of a ship that problems occur, isn't it? I admit I have a very large lack of experience here.
Does it have a helipad? Any reason it can't have a SeaKing or such on station to get medical emergencies on their way quickly?
Why the fuck are you people so against learning from history?
Because they are Better and won't make any mistakes.
(that was sarcasm, by the way)
Of course, true pirates could also come back to the high seas.
Somalia would like to remind you that they never left.
You (incorrectly) assume that the only adults who play games are dysfunctional.
I wish Texas would just go secede already, and that the federal government would just let them. Nothing of value would be lost, and most of those silly patent trolls would go with them.
They do? I thought, in Spanish, that you speak that "M" with your lips (as in English) and the "C" with your tongue (like a shortened S). Totally different sound structure.
Not that I speak Spanish, so please correct me :)
Way to care about something that matters.
Never.
Never.
Because of these posts.
Nope.
I don't think so.
If you're stuck playing with teeny boppers, you're playing the wrong game.
I'm pretty sure we should all just foe Lunix Nutcase (the name should be a clue) and make sure our "Viewing" settings are set to show Foes with a -6 modifier.
I'd bet Tim and a few of the other early visionaries might disagree with you.
... and just so you know, since I just know you are going to say it: you're now on my foe list so slashdot shows you as -1 for me, and I don't have to read your shit ever again. Nothing personal, and it's not meant to be trite.
Does it have to be? IT'S A FUCKING OPINION.
We are all allowed to have them and they do not have to jive. STOP FUCKING ATTACKING PEOPLE'S OPINIONS. State your case and move on. If you have to go "nyu ah you're wrong so there" then you're doing it wrong.
orthognal standards.
That's not a thing. But I know what you are saying.
I respectfully disagree. Would you argue that the 802.3 has nothing to do with the internet? You'll notice that wireless and traditional ethernet are all underneath 802, which includes such gems as the standards that govern cable modems? It's all one family, and arguably this family forms the backbone of the internet (in a figurative sense, not the literal). They should all be open. This is an opinion. You are allowed to disagree. You are not likely to convince me otherwise.
This is a standard for wireless local area networks. What do you think the internet is? Lets break the word down for you:
Inter: a prefix occurring in loanwords from Latin, where it meant “between,” “among,” ...
Net: short for "network"
I hope you can figure it out from there.