Slashdot Mirror


User: X0563511

X0563511's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
10,035
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 10,035

  1. Re:Oh the irony... on MPAA Dismisses COICA Free Speech Concerns · · Score: 1

    There is indeed no honor among thieves.

  2. Re:FIrst post! on MPAA Dismisses COICA Free Speech Concerns · · Score: 1

    You didn't even manage first fail. ... you also for got that important little checkbox...

  3. Re:This is really starting to get raw on MPAA Dismisses COICA Free Speech Concerns · · Score: 1

    Indeed. We'll just dismiss "privacy concerns" when we break into your bedroom while you fuck your mistress (or... whatever you call a male "mistress" as the case may be), Mr. Pisano. I'm sure you'll understand.

  4. Re:Pisano for president! on MPAA Dismisses COICA Free Speech Concerns · · Score: 1

    You're wrong about that last bit. Our ability to express our opinion (that the MPAA is a gang of turd-burglars) is protected by that very amendment, by design.

  5. Re:You can't steal from corporations on MPAA Dismisses COICA Free Speech Concerns · · Score: 1

    Even if you WERE going to buy it, you still didn't steal anything. Until you had actually forked over money, the sale did not exist. Projected sales are just that: projections.

  6. Re:You can't steal from corporations on MPAA Dismisses COICA Free Speech Concerns · · Score: 2, Funny

    My physics teacher had a slight modification that I much prefer:

    There are no stupid questions, only stupid people.

  7. Re:Did anyone else... on Scientists Propose One-Way Trips To Mars · · Score: 1

    Bah to explain. Changing the voltage on a single line doesn't do anything helpful, but when it's done over time in relation to other similar lines, suddenly you have a serial protocol.

    Something along this idea couldn't be done?

  8. Re:Did anyone else... on Scientists Propose One-Way Trips To Mars · · Score: 1

    So the collapse of the waveform in relation to the timing of others isn't useful?

  9. Re:The source of the problem on Shadow Scholar Details Student Cheating · · Score: 1

    Oh, well then.

    Still, I don't quite get why you react that way. Just because you knew then really doesn't mean that you know now! Unless you've got an eidetic memory or something (and in that case, you should put this fact in it: not everyone does)

  10. Re:Did anyone else... on Scientists Propose One-Way Trips To Mars · · Score: 1

    It doesn't? Then "spooky action at a distance" is entirely wrong and doesn't exist.

  11. Re:The source of the problem on Shadow Scholar Details Student Cheating · · Score: 1

    Well I happen to think that the idea of a degree is obsolete as well. Unless degrees start coming with expiration dates unless you 'refresh' it somehow...

    I don't understand your last bit though. You say there is no difference between having known in the past and knowing now. How can you explain that without making no sense at all?

    If I used to know how to build a raft (random example) but I no longer remember, then I can't exactly go about building a raft should I need to, can I?

  12. Re:Once and for all... on New Rootkit Bypasses Windows Code-Signing Security · · Score: 1

    You grabbed onto the wrong part of my reply. That part didn't matter. The important part is that "virii" is jargon, just like "boxen" - neither need to be valid words or grammar.

    Jargon is like technical slang - neither cares much about the rules.

  13. Re:Hope it just leaks lots of data on New Rootkit Bypasses Windows Code-Signing Security · · Score: 1

    Because anything I had to say had ANYTHING to do with US politics.

  14. Re:MMO bubble officially popped? on Failed MMO APB To Be Resurrected As Free-To-Play Game · · Score: 1

    Two products do not a bubble make.

  15. Re:Nobody Noticed ... Except Everyone (Even Slashd on For 18 Minutes, 15% of the Internet Routed Through China · · Score: 1

    I think you underestimate just how much data that is...

  16. Re:bullshit on Internet Blacklist Back In Congress · · Score: 1

    'superdave80' obviously doesn't eat bananas. No worries.

  17. Re:bullshit on Internet Blacklist Back In Congress · · Score: 1

    How about you both shut the hell up?

    Just an idea :P

  18. Re:Obama will not veto this. on Internet Blacklist Back In Congress · · Score: 1

    The electoral college makes certain your vote is thrown away regardless. Vote as you like! It's not like it matters!

  19. Re:Obama will not veto this. on Internet Blacklist Back In Congress · · Score: 1

    Your nickname is eerily appropriate to your comment...

  20. Re:Before I even clicks the links in summary... on Internet Blacklist Back In Congress · · Score: 1

    ... is there some reason you are self-censoring a word that arguably needs no censoring?

    You don't censor the words 'vulgar speech' do you?

  21. Re:Once and for all... on New Rootkit Bypasses Windows Code-Signing Security · · Score: 1

    Here's my $0.02:

    Jargon is jargon.

  22. Re:Hope it just leaks lots of data on New Rootkit Bypasses Windows Code-Signing Security · · Score: 1

    Who decided that Oxford defined the English Language? Who the hell even has the right to make such a decision?

  23. Re:teh snappy!!!! on The ~200 Line Linux Kernel Patch That Does Wonders · · Score: 1

    When I build a kernel, I have a whole list of schedulers to choose from...

    AFAIK this pluggable scheduler is a more modular thing. Not really that big of a deal as you usually don't change a system's role quite often.

  24. Re:teh snappy!!!! on The ~200 Line Linux Kernel Patch That Does Wonders · · Score: 1

    I generally don't toss my desktop out back to play server for the weekend. It's not often that a "hot swappable" scheduler would be useful.

    As we have it now, you can select which scheduler to use when you build the kernel. That's not all that bad, is it?

  25. Re:Compiling the kernel on The ~200 Line Linux Kernel Patch That Does Wonders · · Score: 1

    ... you haven't tried starting BOINC with 'nice' have you?