Fluid dynamics has the same problem, as you mention via proxy of "a few hundred atoms" - looking in from the outside, it seems that the lessons learned simulating that could be applied here?
It doesn't have to be physical. You can put all the nodes down at the start, but do not establish linkings.
Then, you start with the first "node" - I would imagine this would be a brainstem precursor. Instead of multiplying like what happens biologically, the node can pick an inactive neighbor to activate and link with.
These behaviors should, at a very small scale, be observable - it's like fluid dynamics... simple at the small scale, but when you zoom out and look at the system as a whole...
It's hard to have a fatal accident when traffic is moving 5mph when it actually moves.
I have actually been there, in Rome, in traffic. People act insane, yes - but again it's hard to kill yourself when your car is moving slower than you can run.
Let's also be fair - the Bill Gates of the 80s and 90s is not the Bill Gates of today. People can and do change - and honestly, I would put money down that he always thought he was doing what was right.
If you exist on one side of the galaxy at one moment, and on the other the next, this does not mean you traveled a path between the two points in three-dimensional space as we understand it. Should there be a means to complete that positional change without passing through the space between, then acceleration and velocity do not come into play at all, and so neither does special relativity.
Slashdot Mirror
This is why.
It just recently started picking up steam - but it is doing so absurdly fast.
So, now MS knows what it feels like, huh?
What ads? Oh right, the ones I filter out.
Fuck these bastards, and fuck them hard.
I like to block advertisers and data miners.
How does that compute, motherfuckers?
... and fuck you, for liking them.
Fluid dynamics has the same problem, as you mention via proxy of "a few hundred atoms" - looking in from the outside, it seems that the lessons learned simulating that could be applied here?
It doesn't have to be physical. You can put all the nodes down at the start, but do not establish linkings.
Then, you start with the first "node" - I would imagine this would be a brainstem precursor. Instead of multiplying like what happens biologically, the node can pick an inactive neighbor to activate and link with.
These behaviors should, at a very small scale, be observable - it's like fluid dynamics... simple at the small scale, but when you zoom out and look at the system as a whole...
Let "neurons" power themselves up, simulating mitosis. Your neurons didn't just appear one day, they grew from a single gamete.
It doesn't need to be a mirror image, but it needs to "develop" in the same manner.
The brain is plastic.
Maybe you missed the part where it mentioned the fact that they -had- redundancy, and that one had also failed?
I'm sorry, it's incredibly difficult to understand what you're saying when you have your head buried in your rectum.
Maybe I just don't get it - but even if I had the devices, I don't think I would be interested in such functionality.
Oh sure, that's a feature everyone uses...
Set the service to manual, and should you ever want to start it:
windows-r; net start XXXX
Badum!!! (net stop XXX to kill it after)
It's hard to have a fatal accident when traffic is moving 5mph when it actually moves.
I have actually been there, in Rome, in traffic. People act insane, yes - but again it's hard to kill yourself when your car is moving slower than you can run.
It's there to enforce the speed limit. Your argument is against speed limits, not law enforcement.
Last I checked, the police don't set the speed limit, they just make sure you obey it.
... and that is why aircraft have transponders, and airports have radar and spotters.
Let's also be fair - the Bill Gates of the 80s and 90s is not the Bill Gates of today. People can and do change - and honestly, I would put money down that he always thought he was doing what was right.
If you exist on one side of the galaxy at one moment, and on the other the next, this does not mean you traveled a path between the two points in three-dimensional space as we understand it. Should there be a means to complete that positional change without passing through the space between, then acceleration and velocity do not come into play at all, and so neither does special relativity.
I guess you didn't even read the summary, or you'd realize we're talking about infrastructure and not toys or luxuries.
Yes, it would.
You don't seem to understand the "concept" behind "warp."
You are not exceeding the speed of light, you are just not traveling the linear distance between the two points.
Wrong. Ubuntu uses YY.MM date-based numbering.
Secretly?