Have guns actually brought freedom even once since 1800?
The 2nd has a horrendous track record of protecting the 1st.
The ACLU, however, has a much better track record.
You know what I would do if there was no government? I'd go up and steal your watch.
You're bringing your friends? I'll bring my friends.
And now we're back to square 1.
Do you really think that removing the government completely would change anything for the better?
Okay, get it in any peer-reviewed paper. You know, reviewed by people with Ph.Ds? Or is there some evil conspiracy theory trying to destroy the benevolent oil companies?
We partially understand the rise and fall of animal populations. When you make a significant change to something in nature, you destabilize it. This is fairly basic chaos theory. This is basically why we had 28 tropical storms in the 2005 hurricane season but practically none this season.
College student income is a bit higher although it doesn't come to you in cash: Your dorm is much cheaper than a poor teacher's apartment(for several reasons) and besides your parents are probably the ones paying for that. And you may be able to walk to class but the teacher who lives two blocks away from school has to have a car in order to drive. You also probably don't have any children, that multiplies the food expense and requires much more than your cheap dorm.
Punishment is a very small disincentive to commit crime for the sort of person who would commit the type of crime that warrants the death penalty. And to everybody saying that there are no reversible punishments--There are different degrees of reversibility for punishment and death is the least reversible of all, at least until we have the Goa'uld sarcophagus.
Slashdot Mirror
And if you don't live in a swing state, you don't actually even get to choose between D or R. You can thank the Electoral College for that.
Have guns actually brought freedom even once since 1800?
The 2nd has a horrendous track record of protecting the 1st.
The ACLU, however, has a much better track record.
You know what I would do if there was no government? I'd go up and steal your watch.
You're bringing your friends? I'll bring my friends.
And now we're back to square 1.
Do you really think that removing the government completely would change anything for the better?
Yes. The "Do-not-call" list doesn't apply to political calls, but if you tell them not to call, they better not call.
That was one person. This is the RNC itself.
Of course, billions of years ago before O2-breathing animals existed, the Earth would not have been a hospitable place for humanity.
No, but carbon dioxide levels haven't. They usually go somewhere between 200 and 300 parts per million, and they're currently at 380.
I immediately thought of that when I saw the article.
Okay, get it in any peer-reviewed paper. You know, reviewed by people with Ph.Ds? Or is there some evil conspiracy theory trying to destroy the benevolent oil companies?
We partially understand the rise and fall of animal populations. When you make a significant change to something in nature, you destabilize it. This is fairly basic chaos theory. This is basically why we had 28 tropical storms in the 2005 hurricane season but practically none this season.
He isn't an Admiral anymore now that Pegasus is gone. Lee went back down to Major too.
College student income is a bit higher although it doesn't come to you in cash: Your dorm is much cheaper than a poor teacher's apartment(for several reasons) and besides your parents are probably the ones paying for that. And you may be able to walk to class but the teacher who lives two blocks away from school has to have a car in order to drive. You also probably don't have any children, that multiplies the food expense and requires much more than your cheap dorm.
No, but if they aren't wearing seatbelts the government and insurance company rarely give very much monetary sympathy.
Um, how the hell does Kyoto make China increase emissions? Oh wait, you're full of shit here. (And America is still the world's largest polluter.)
That Saddam died the day he was put under arrest awaiting trial. At that point he wasn't going to be able to put anybody into terror anymore.
God forbid that somebody choose how much they will pay for supporting something.
Punishment is a very small disincentive to commit crime for the sort of person who would commit the type of crime that warrants the death penalty. And to everybody saying that there are no reversible punishments--There are different degrees of reversibility for punishment and death is the least reversible of all, at least until we have the Goa'uld sarcophagus.
Mercy is the mark of a great man.
Guess I'm just a good man.
I'm alright...
Nietzsche. Or does he just announce it?
90% of the Iraqi people want the US out. And that was a year ago. It's probably more now.
Cut welfare and then the Americans who actually do work won't be able to afford a home or even food.
Isn't fertilizer also used to make bombs? Interesting coincidence.
features of blogs. What are these people thinking?
It's more like 300000 civilian deaths now.