Except uber DOESN'T work with the free market. It ignores all of the laws and regulations for consumer protection and safety that other businesses have to follow, like adequate insurance.
I was hoping someone else figured this one out. I explain to non-technical people all the time that it's not hard to store large amounts of energy in a small space, it's hard to keep that energy from being released all at once in a KB malfunction.
The smart ones ask what KB stands for. The really smart ones figure out it means "KaBoom" on their own.
I love your double standards. Everything feminists want to blame on the current boogeyman is incontrovertibly the fault of that scapegoat. But when someone was so targeted by feminists that her mail was sent directly to a bomb squad, that she was forced to flee the country, and the threats against her are actually played out suddenly you can't accept it.
Gee someone whose mail had been sent directly to a bomb squad rather than her home due to the sheer amount of violent threats, who lived with constant abuse and threats of violence, who was forced to leave one country already due to those threats of violence and continued to receive them here in the US, finally had one of those threats made good on.
Finding her shooting is not difficult at all. As for the cute trick you pulled weaseling in the claim about wikipedia and "independent reliable sources" nothing could be further from the truth. Wikipedia's definition of a "reliable source" is any source which says something approved of by Wikiproject:Feminism. Personal blog posts and tweets are reliable sources for any claim if the person making them is someone like Zoe Quinn while third party newsmedia articles are unreliable if they dispute feminists' claims.
I've already linked you to her own firsthand testimonial many times. You call that "dubious" and "peripherally related" or pretend it's never happened.
Schumer is a self-admitted rapist who has herself publicly told the story of how she raped a man too drunk to know where he was or who he was with, and Nyberg is a self-admitted pedophile and child predator who's been publicly given pictures of people's children for gratification.
Thanks for demonstrating exactly the behavior I just described.
Funny how you "believe women" and will insist women never make false claims right up until it's a woman talking about feminist misconduct then suddenly it's "dubious" and "peripherally related".
2. People who subscribe to a critical theory based ideology which rejects the existence of an objective knowable truth and empirical facts in favor of "lived experiences", ranks humans by their immutable characteristics (ie identity politics), and loosely follows marx's descriptions of class warfare and oppression only applied to gender and race instead of the original means of production/proletariat dynamic. In behavior SJWs are politically illiberal, dismissive of enlightenment values such as freedom of speech and even thought, hostile to dissenting opinions and cast disagreement as "harassment" and "violence", openly engage in racism and sexism but claim it "doesn't count" because of their own internal definition for those words granting them immunity, and generally hostile to the idea of the presumption of innocence. As a group the dynamic hits on basically every definition of a cult or abusive relationship and they respond with extreme hostility and often outright violence to anyone disagreeing with them, often verbalizing that they're allegedly being attacked and victimized even while they physically attack someone else. Given the cult-like nature of SJWism it's unsurprising that high ranking or profitable in-group members are given a pass for any level of misconduct, even for things like pedophilia and rape (sarah nyberg and amy schumer respectively), as long as they rank highly enough in the oppression olympics or continue to "kiss the ring" and bring in money or influence.
I could keep going into more specific ideological tenets common across the SocJus spectrum but these are the generalities.
3. Your entire post history is filled with rampant illiberalism, hostility to due process and the presumption of innocence, witch hunting, and the defense of in-group members for things you'd pillory outsiders over.
Enough of your bad faith shenanigans. I've linked you to her articles a fucking dozen times already, you've got her full name, you know what we're talking about, either go read your own old replies or google it. This memory-of-a-goldfish bent you and amimojo have gotten on recently where you demand things you've literally been given over and over again and pretend it never happened is getting old.
Making a buck? Those days have been gone for a long time. Odds are you'll spend more in mileage, maintenance, and fuel on your vehicle than you'll make on today's slave wages.
Because only things you agree with are facts. As usual. Then again one of the core tenets of feminism is the total rejection of the very idea of an objective knowable truth or the existence of empirical facts. The only that that matters are the "lived experiences" and feelings of the person with the most oppression points in the room.
Like amimojo you're engaging in the classic tactic of trying to make it impossible to even name the group or ideology at hand, thus silencing debate. Imagine trying to argue against republican economic policies when you're not even allowed to say the words "trickle down" or "neoliberal".
"Alt-right", like "reactionary", has no meaningful definition. SJW is the response to people like you demanding we stop calling SJWs feminists even though they self-identify AS feminists. It has a specific definition, and refers to tangible actions and a describable ideology.
these are the de facto leaders of the MRM. You'll notice that the majority are women, one's black, and one's a bisexual single mom. The elderly woman in the center is the woman who founded the very first domestic violence shelter in the modern world... and had a drive by shooting at her house for daring to shelter male victims as well as female ones.
The only people that can't stop being offended by women and minorities seem to be feminists and the regressive left.
Two in a row, you're really doing a great job as a living example. "Alt-right" along with "reactionary" is just yet another smear word invented by SJWs to attack anyone committing thoughtcrime. EVERYONE they dislike is an alt-right reactionary misogynist gamergater MRA pissbaby fuckboy.
Prolonged stays in space seem to cause our bodies to break down in all kinds of interesting ways. Eventually we're going to need to either find some way around that or some way to adapt to it.
Except anything less and nobody would have cared. Corporations aren't people. You can't lock them up, all you can do is bankrupt them. Anything less than putting them out of business and as far as the corporation is concerned it's just a cost to write off.
Do you understand what testimony is? It is someone alleging that something happened and giving an account of it. Maybe you have seen courts on TV where people give testimony and it is weighed as evidence.
Testimony is a material witness saying what they saw with the chance for cross examination and mandatory production of exculpatory evidence, with lots of limitations such as hearsay, as well as the opportunity to counter the testimony or impeach the credibility of the witness or testimony. It's not anonymous allegations which the alleged victim has already completely rejected.
Okay, where is your evidence? If you don't provide any, even just a description of what you claimed happened, all you have done is discredit yourself.
You're supporting rape culture. Believe victims. False rape accusations never happen. etc.
This I have to see. You really must provide a link to this video, you can't just let wild accusations like that slide with a flippant "google it".
Already linked below by ArylAkamov.
See Shadow, this is your modus operandi. Post some bullshit, redefine words in your own head, provide zero evidence because apparently you don't even know what evidence is, and then accuse others of doing all those things.
A feminist tells you clearly that they don't believe what you think they believe, and you simply call them a liar and claim they must be the evil horrible people you think they are. What the hell is wrong with you?
I posted hard facts, like the victim herself explicitly and totally rejecting the claims made by an anonymous third party, and argued against witch hunts and lynch mobs. If you want to look at redefining words in your own head look at feminism's constant motte-and-bailey tactics as well as creative definitions like "power + prejudice".
As for claiming not to believe something... your own posts have constantly and universally proven your actual position on things. Just look at your continued support of literal child predators and abusers like Sarah Nyberg and Zoe Quinn. Your actions belie your claims. You can claim not to believe in witch hunting all you want, but as long as you continue to burn people at the stake for witchcraft your actions reveal the truth.
I'm not redefining anything, I'm describing things based on what they are in the real world. Redefining things to stifle rebate is feminism redefining sexism to exclude its own conduct and declaring "feminism = equality". Observing that in the real world feminism is violent and anti-equality isn't redefining anything.
Slashdot Mirror
Except uber DOESN'T work with the free market. It ignores all of the laws and regulations for consumer protection and safety that other businesses have to follow, like adequate insurance.
I've always been able to spot other trekkers by how people react to me referring to any digital female voice as Majel.
I was hoping someone else figured this one out. I explain to non-technical people all the time that it's not hard to store large amounts of energy in a small space, it's hard to keep that energy from being released all at once in a KB malfunction.
The smart ones ask what KB stands for. The really smart ones figure out it means "KaBoom" on their own.
I love your double standards. Everything feminists want to blame on the current boogeyman is incontrovertibly the fault of that scapegoat. But when someone was so targeted by feminists that her mail was sent directly to a bomb squad, that she was forced to flee the country, and the threats against her are actually played out suddenly you can't accept it.
Gee someone whose mail had been sent directly to a bomb squad rather than her home due to the sheer amount of violent threats, who lived with constant abuse and threats of violence, who was forced to leave one country already due to those threats of violence and continued to receive them here in the US, finally had one of those threats made good on.
I wonder.
Finding her shooting is not difficult at all. As for the cute trick you pulled weaseling in the claim about wikipedia and "independent reliable sources" nothing could be further from the truth. Wikipedia's definition of a "reliable source" is any source which says something approved of by Wikiproject:Feminism. Personal blog posts and tweets are reliable sources for any claim if the person making them is someone like Zoe Quinn while third party newsmedia articles are unreliable if they dispute feminists' claims.
I've already linked you to her own firsthand testimonial many times. You call that "dubious" and "peripherally related" or pretend it's never happened.
Schumer is a self-admitted rapist who has herself publicly told the story of how she raped a man too drunk to know where he was or who he was with, and Nyberg is a self-admitted pedophile and child predator who's been publicly given pictures of people's children for gratification.
Thanks for demonstrating exactly the behavior I just described.
Funny how you "believe women" and will insist women never make false claims right up until it's a woman talking about feminist misconduct then suddenly it's "dubious" and "peripherally related".
I'm just describing Critical Theory's basic tenets in plain language instead of opaque academic jargon.
1. yes
2. People who subscribe to a critical theory based ideology which rejects the existence of an objective knowable truth and empirical facts in favor of "lived experiences", ranks humans by their immutable characteristics (ie identity politics), and loosely follows marx's descriptions of class warfare and oppression only applied to gender and race instead of the original means of production/proletariat dynamic. In behavior SJWs are politically illiberal, dismissive of enlightenment values such as freedom of speech and even thought, hostile to dissenting opinions and cast disagreement as "harassment" and "violence", openly engage in racism and sexism but claim it "doesn't count" because of their own internal definition for those words granting them immunity, and generally hostile to the idea of the presumption of innocence. As a group the dynamic hits on basically every definition of a cult or abusive relationship and they respond with extreme hostility and often outright violence to anyone disagreeing with them, often verbalizing that they're allegedly being attacked and victimized even while they physically attack someone else. Given the cult-like nature of SJWism it's unsurprising that high ranking or profitable in-group members are given a pass for any level of misconduct, even for things like pedophilia and rape (sarah nyberg and amy schumer respectively), as long as they rank highly enough in the oppression olympics or continue to "kiss the ring" and bring in money or influence.
I could keep going into more specific ideological tenets common across the SocJus spectrum but these are the generalities.
3. Your entire post history is filled with rampant illiberalism, hostility to due process and the presumption of innocence, witch hunting, and the defense of in-group members for things you'd pillory outsiders over.
Enough of your bad faith shenanigans. I've linked you to her articles a fucking dozen times already, you've got her full name, you know what we're talking about, either go read your own old replies or google it. This memory-of-a-goldfish bent you and amimojo have gotten on recently where you demand things you've literally been given over and over again and pretend it never happened is getting old.
Making a buck? Those days have been gone for a long time. Odds are you'll spend more in mileage, maintenance, and fuel on your vehicle than you'll make on today's slave wages.
Because only things you agree with are facts. As usual. Then again one of the core tenets of feminism is the total rejection of the very idea of an objective knowable truth or the existence of empirical facts. The only that that matters are the "lived experiences" and feelings of the person with the most oppression points in the room.
Like amimojo you're engaging in the classic tactic of trying to make it impossible to even name the group or ideology at hand, thus silencing debate. Imagine trying to argue against republican economic policies when you're not even allowed to say the words "trickle down" or "neoliberal".
"Alt-right", like "reactionary", has no meaningful definition. SJW is the response to people like you demanding we stop calling SJWs feminists even though they self-identify AS feminists. It has a specific definition, and refers to tangible actions and a describable ideology.
Serviscope I've told you about Erin Pizzey, and linked you to her own written testimonial about her experiences, multiple times.
these are the de facto leaders of the MRM. You'll notice that the majority are women, one's black, and one's a bisexual single mom. The elderly woman in the center is the woman who founded the very first domestic violence shelter in the modern world... and had a drive by shooting at her house for daring to shelter male victims as well as female ones.
The only people that can't stop being offended by women and minorities seem to be feminists and the regressive left.
Two in a row, you're really doing a great job as a living example. "Alt-right" along with "reactionary" is just yet another smear word invented by SJWs to attack anyone committing thoughtcrime. EVERYONE they dislike is an alt-right reactionary misogynist gamergater MRA pissbaby fuckboy.
Thank you for demonstrating exactly what we're all talking about. Thoughtcrime is "harassment", disagreement is "threatening".
You seem to be ignoring that they got caught flat out lying.
Prolonged stays in space seem to cause our bodies to break down in all kinds of interesting ways. Eventually we're going to need to either find some way around that or some way to adapt to it.
Except anything less and nobody would have cared. Corporations aren't people. You can't lock them up, all you can do is bankrupt them. Anything less than putting them out of business and as far as the corporation is concerned it's just a cost to write off.
Do you understand what testimony is? It is someone alleging that something happened and giving an account of it. Maybe you have seen courts on TV where people give testimony and it is weighed as evidence.
Testimony is a material witness saying what they saw with the chance for cross examination and mandatory production of exculpatory evidence, with lots of limitations such as hearsay, as well as the opportunity to counter the testimony or impeach the credibility of the witness or testimony. It's not anonymous allegations which the alleged victim has already completely rejected.
Okay, where is your evidence? If you don't provide any, even just a description of what you claimed happened, all you have done is discredit yourself.
You're supporting rape culture. Believe victims. False rape accusations never happen. etc.
This I have to see. You really must provide a link to this video, you can't just let wild accusations like that slide with a flippant "google it".
Already linked below by ArylAkamov.
See Shadow, this is your modus operandi. Post some bullshit, redefine words in your own head, provide zero evidence because apparently you don't even know what evidence is, and then accuse others of doing all those things.
A feminist tells you clearly that they don't believe what you think they believe, and you simply call them a liar and claim they must be the evil horrible people you think they are. What the hell is wrong with you?
I posted hard facts, like the victim herself explicitly and totally rejecting the claims made by an anonymous third party, and argued against witch hunts and lynch mobs. If you want to look at redefining words in your own head look at feminism's constant motte-and-bailey tactics as well as creative definitions like "power + prejudice".
As for claiming not to believe something... your own posts have constantly and universally proven your actual position on things. Just look at your continued support of literal child predators and abusers like Sarah Nyberg and Zoe Quinn. Your actions belie your claims. You can claim not to believe in witch hunting all you want, but as long as you continue to burn people at the stake for witchcraft your actions reveal the truth.
I'm not redefining anything, I'm describing things based on what they are in the real world. Redefining things to stifle rebate is feminism redefining sexism to exclude its own conduct and declaring "feminism = equality". Observing that in the real world feminism is violent and anti-equality isn't redefining anything.
There. We've got two accusations corroborating each other already. We can each make a couple more accounts or post as ACs and there's six to ten.