alt-rightist? sexist stereotypes from the 19th century? The guy's a left-of-center californian who was citing a lot of peer reviewed literature, saying that simply handing shit to people for their gender/race was harmful, advocating for meaningful reform that would actually help women in the field, and calling for greater ideological diversity in google.
This is why nobody takes these terms seriously anymore. This is just like when people accused Dave Rubin of being a nazi.
You're joking, right? A core part of both of her two previous campaigns was trying to astroturf the narrative that everyone opposing her was just a misogynist "Obama Boy/Bernie Bro", and this most recent campaign heavily relied on the astoundingly self-entitled "It's Her Turn" narrative. None of those outlets have remotely been meaningfully critical of Hillary, and they've all gone to extreme lengths to astroturf for her down to the level of enforcing a media blackout on actual liberals like Sanders or pushing fake narratives in favor of her.
Secondly any claim that a particular thing is the total embodiment of "equality" or "freedom" or "good" is the mark of a cult, because it makes it literally impossible to criticise something. You can't criticise "equality" or "good", you can't disagree with it, you can only be a heretic and an unbeliever.
The reality is that feminism has and is doing truly awful and repugnant anti-equality things like spending millions opposing equal custody rights, passing laws that turn half of all victims of domestic violence into literal second class citizens, and completely erasing half of all rape victims to preserve its ideologically driven narrative about rape being somehow uniquely and inherently male behavior.
Feminims isn't "the radical idea men and women are equal", it's the belief that men are inherently and irredeemably evil and need to be controlled and repressed to protect pure and inherently good women.
Because a lot of apps were ok for a while and then turned to shit with invasive spyware laden adds, massive size bloat, and performance issues and no matter how many people return to give it a 1star they'll never be able to pull down the rating too much because of all the early top ratings.
What google REALLY needs to do is give ratings a halflife so they stop counting after a certain amount of time or versions.
I want high cholesterol. I wanna eat bacon and butter and BUCKETS of cheese, okay? I wanna smoke a Cuban cigar the size of Cincinnati in the non-smoking section. I wanna run through the streets naked with green Jell-O all over my body reading Playboy magazine. Why? Because I suddenly might feel the need to, okay, pal?
People who didn't public support hillary were ostracized. People who supported someone else were brutally beaten in the streets, some to the point of being hospitalized. How many people REALLY supported her?
The difference between "How likely is this result assuming the Null Hypothesis is true" and "This result is X% likely to be random chance" is very, very slight when it comes to simply deciding whether or not a study's results merit further inquiry. So yes it's a misconception, but it's a misconception that's so microscopically close to the actual truth that it's alright for the layman or average undergrad to rely on it.
The real problem is that we're using P-values all over the place for bullshit like the social sciences (I should know, I am one) and it gives a false air of scientificness to stuff that's about as scientifically sound as reading chicken entrails.
Not the seller, the courier. Leaving a package on a doorstep is no less negligent than leaving it on the side of the road and telling someone to go get it before it's stolen. This should be covered under existing law.
What carriers REALLY want to do is hit up everyone for protection money by threatening them with slowdowns, delays, and data charges if they don't pony up.
Google doesn't even HAVE support in any meaningful way. If something gets fucked up with any of the usual google services (gmail, calendar, etc) you're screwed and that's all there is to it. Short of having a friend who works for google or being a big enough public figure to shitstir there's no way to contact a human and no way to resolve the problem.
No, the only people that matter are a handful of urban elites who will essentially rule the entire rest of the country. That's not democracy, that's feudalism. If you want to see how it works out in real life go watch The Hunger Games.
No, they won't. The system will just become vastly more imbalanced. Citizens in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Houston would be astronomically more important than everyone else in the entire country to the point that only major cities would matter. The rest of the country would basically be serfs.
and yet she gets a free pass for things we're putting the likes of General Petraeus away for. It only takes a few key friends... or people who just don't want to "commit suicide".
With the exception of finally getting nailed by the IRS your argument works for Al Capone as well. Does it prove he was clean as a whistle, or does it prove he was a criminal but nobody could ever make anything stick because of widespread corruption?
Except, yknow, the NYT has proven itself utterly ethically bankrupt repeatedly over the last few years and Wirecutter is probably going to wind up being nothing more than native advertising now.
You do realise that saying "citation needed" for something that was literally day to day news just makes you look like a pedantic ass, right? Seth Rich's murder is common knowledge on the level of Mike Pence being a state governor and Hillary Clinton having been a senator.
Slashdot Mirror
Funny how you of all people suddenly care about causation when your entire shtick is ignoring that correlation ISN'T causation to push your agenda.
alt-rightist? sexist stereotypes from the 19th century? The guy's a left-of-center californian who was citing a lot of peer reviewed literature, saying that simply handing shit to people for their gender/race was harmful, advocating for meaningful reform that would actually help women in the field, and calling for greater ideological diversity in google.
This is why nobody takes these terms seriously anymore. This is just like when people accused Dave Rubin of being a nazi.
You're joking, right? A core part of both of her two previous campaigns was trying to astroturf the narrative that everyone opposing her was just a misogynist "Obama Boy/Bernie Bro", and this most recent campaign heavily relied on the astoundingly self-entitled "It's Her Turn" narrative. None of those outlets have remotely been meaningfully critical of Hillary, and they've all gone to extreme lengths to astroturf for her down to the level of enforcing a media blackout on actual liberals like Sanders or pushing fake narratives in favor of her.
Secondly any claim that a particular thing is the total embodiment of "equality" or "freedom" or "good" is the mark of a cult, because it makes it literally impossible to criticise something. You can't criticise "equality" or "good", you can't disagree with it, you can only be a heretic and an unbeliever.
The reality is that feminism has and is doing truly awful and repugnant anti-equality things like spending millions opposing equal custody rights, passing laws that turn half of all victims of domestic violence into literal second class citizens, and completely erasing half of all rape victims to preserve its ideologically driven narrative about rape being somehow uniquely and inherently male behavior.
Feminims isn't "the radical idea men and women are equal", it's the belief that men are inherently and irredeemably evil and need to be controlled and repressed to protect pure and inherently good women.
Now find an MSNBC, CNN, WaPo, et al piece that's highly critical of clinton or any other feminist figurehead...
Because a lot of apps were ok for a while and then turned to shit with invasive spyware laden adds, massive size bloat, and performance issues and no matter how many people return to give it a 1star they'll never be able to pull down the rating too much because of all the early top ratings.
What google REALLY needs to do is give ratings a halflife so they stop counting after a certain amount of time or versions.
I want high cholesterol. I wanna eat bacon and butter and BUCKETS of cheese, okay? I wanna smoke a Cuban cigar the size of Cincinnati in the non-smoking section. I wanna run through the streets naked with green Jell-O all over my body reading Playboy magazine. Why? Because I suddenly might feel the need to, okay, pal?
People who didn't public support hillary were ostracized. People who supported someone else were brutally beaten in the streets, some to the point of being hospitalized. How many people REALLY supported her?
The difference between "How likely is this result assuming the Null Hypothesis is true" and "This result is X% likely to be random chance" is very, very slight when it comes to simply deciding whether or not a study's results merit further inquiry. So yes it's a misconception, but it's a misconception that's so microscopically close to the actual truth that it's alright for the layman or average undergrad to rely on it.
The real problem is that we're using P-values all over the place for bullshit like the social sciences (I should know, I am one) and it gives a false air of scientificness to stuff that's about as scientifically sound as reading chicken entrails.
Not the seller, the courier. Leaving a package on a doorstep is no less negligent than leaving it on the side of the road and telling someone to go get it before it's stolen. This should be covered under existing law.
What carriers REALLY want to do is hit up everyone for protection money by threatening them with slowdowns, delays, and data charges if they don't pony up.
It would also dredge back up her and the DNC rigging the primaries
Google doesn't even HAVE support in any meaningful way. If something gets fucked up with any of the usual google services (gmail, calendar, etc) you're screwed and that's all there is to it. Short of having a friend who works for google or being a big enough public figure to shitstir there's no way to contact a human and no way to resolve the problem.
No, the only people that matter are a handful of urban elites who will essentially rule the entire rest of the country. That's not democracy, that's feudalism. If you want to see how it works out in real life go watch The Hunger Games.
No, they won't. The system will just become vastly more imbalanced. Citizens in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Houston would be astronomically more important than everyone else in the entire country to the point that only major cities would matter. The rest of the country would basically be serfs.
So you think they'll all go plaid eventually?
. It's the same justification that created a multi-gallon buffer between the low fuel warning light and idiocy.
This is just a mechanical result of the floater design.
And if you abandon the electoral college then the ONLY states that matter will be the few most populous states.
and yet she gets a free pass for things we're putting the likes of General Petraeus away for. It only takes a few key friends... or people who just don't want to "commit suicide".
With the exception of finally getting nailed by the IRS your argument works for Al Capone as well. Does it prove he was clean as a whistle, or does it prove he was a criminal but nobody could ever make anything stick because of widespread corruption?
Because PC players would simply curbstomp console players all the time.
And that's in a controlled setting. Imagine what would happen in the real world where thousands of men kill themselves every single month.
Except, yknow, the NYT has proven itself utterly ethically bankrupt repeatedly over the last few years and Wirecutter is probably going to wind up being nothing more than native advertising now.
You do realise that saying "citation needed" for something that was literally day to day news just makes you look like a pedantic ass, right? Seth Rich's murder is common knowledge on the level of Mike Pence being a state governor and Hillary Clinton having been a senator.
and that the DNC staffer who actually leaked those emails was shot repeatedly in the back and left with all of his money and valuables.
Federal authority over flight rules is likely the federal question.
Except uber drivers aren't independent contractors, they're employees that uber treats like contractors.