Hey, look! More of the same smug condescension that cost you nearly a thousand legislative seats, most of the governorships, both houses of congress, the White House, the Supreme Court, and the good will of millions of two-time Obama voters who turned their back on exactly your sort of vitriol. Sill haven't figured it out, huh?
Hey look, another Trump faggot pretending there's nothing to see
It's always fun to see a homophobic liberal angrily demanding that we do something for reasons that he can't even muster the intellectual honesty to describe.
Look, we know you people working for the DNC are incredibly disingenuous, vitriolic, hysterical loons. We get that. But don'to you think that your permanent misery over - despite having partisans in the DoJ and FBI doing everything possible to help her out - Hillary losing the election should give way to you spending your energy describing a clear-cut, constitutionally sound REASON you think the election should be un-done? Oh, right, I keep forgetting that your real objection is to the constitution itself. Why not just say as much? Is it because you're a coward?
Employers are under no obligation to negotiate with you. Take it or leave it. That's the fucking problem.
Why should they be? Should they be obligated to take a losing deal that ends their company, and thus provides no jobs? Who says which negotiations they must take on? Do you think YOU should be forced to negotiate until you don't get what you need out of the job? Should you be forced to work for somebody because somebody else struck a deal with them? No? Why not? Should you be able to walk away and pursue something else? Of course you should. Just like a business owner should. If they don't want to offer enough money, they won't get decent people to work for them, and they lose. What's wrong with that?
Really? In what way, Mr. Coward? In what way, by identifying the irrationality of people thinking that a gun locked in a trunk is inherently dangerous, am I projecting? The very same people who think the gun locked in the trunk is dangerous ignore the fact that the person operating the car is far more likely - in hard, statistical terms - to kill them by poorly (or maliciously) operating the car itself.
The bigger worry about owning a gun is not that you will murder someone, but that someone will murder you.
This entire notion is nonsense. It's simply a regurgitated meme that I'll be you can't meaningfully back up with non-spun, non-angenda-driven blog entries.
In the meantime, guns are used hundreds of thousands of times a year (I'm rounding down, here - some estimates approach millions of times a year) to stop or prevent violence and harm. The biggest worry about NOT owning a gun is that you won't be able to use that tool to prevent violence done to you or someone you care about. Meanwhile, almost all murder involving guns is conducted by people not in legal possession of the gun they use.
That's scary. If your state allows people to keep guns in their trunks, why don't you move? I know I would flee that shitty state in which you live.
Almost every state allows this. The ones that don't honor the second amendment's protections also happen to have some of the worst murder rates. Is your concern that a shotgun or rifle transported in the locked trunk of your car will somehow jump out and start killing people? I've noticed that the people who most often react with your sort of irrational nonsense are generally projecting - they know that they, personally, aren't stable people.
Amazon already delivers to pickup lockers in many locations. Walk up, flash your barcode or type in a key and your locker pops open. You can also drop off returns in the same way. Many of these are 24x7 operations.
Sure, but when will we finally have Autonomous AI Crypto Blockchain Graphene? And what good is a sheet of graphene if we don't have 3D Printed Open Source Universal Basic Graphene for all?
It's not THE PHONES. It's the services, information, data, tools, communication, maps and other things one gets to through that device that are the issue. People aren't addicted to their phones. They're addicted to their social contacts, to the news, to the novel they're reading, to the weather forecast, and such. Before those phones, they'd have been "addicted" to the AM radio while they were driving, they folded map they looked at, the printed novel they gazed at over lunch, the stock pages in the newspaper, the tabloid paper they picked up at the grocery store, and all of those other analogs.
How much novel reading or stock research is healthy? It's not the phones, just like it's not the guns, and not the spoons.
Translation: "I'm talking out of my ass because I'm a Trump voter and we're the best at it."
Translation: "I'm a Shillary who anonymously posts lazy ad hominem instead of actually addressing the point raised, because I hope that other lazy liberals will get distracted mentally cheering me on and forget to do a little homework and see that the person I'm pretending to scold is actually correct."
You can always tell when a liberal is thinking about Trump, because they start talking about their sexual proclivities. For some reason, they always see Trump through the lens of some sort of homoerotic fantasy. Fascinating.
Well, sure. Because people who do much less than what she did in the way of mishandling classified information, lying about it, destroying records under subpoena and the like... go to jail. So, yes, she should have been locked up. Because she did things that required prosecution and conviction, and people far less guilty get exactly that treatment. This, as opposed to the phony "collusion" narrative being pitched by her camp in yet another way to try to explain away her election loss.
White America has deliberately caused that violence
Oh, you mean with our secret time travel technology? That must be how "white Americans" went back in time and caused tribes in Africa to develop elaborate warrior castes and kill each other in huge numbers. Our secret time travel system must be how we caused the middle eastern cultures to begin slaughtering each other for centuries before the US existed. Sectarian hate and grudge slaughter in the middle east dates back hundreds and hundreds of years, and hasn't let up, ever. Your own eagerness to display your ignorance of history, as usual, is a separate matter. Or, more likely, you know you're lying and are hoping nobody notices because you're a coward.
And the mass majority of gun violence IN THE WORLD in the last decade is mainly by white Americans
Not even close. Tally up the mass murders in African and the Middle East, where people local to those regions slaughter each other in enormous numbers, and you'll see that... never mind, you know you were lying. Stop it.
This has to be a stupid lawsuit by lawyers with nothing better to do and need to get their name out there.
No, it's an opportunity at getting a healthy percentage of a large pile of FB's cash, right when FB will be doing its best to dole out money in every direction possible to beat back recent bad PR. The people suing them are in it strictly for personal enrichment.
Same here. I tracked down a vandal, smashing windshields, because the cops didn't care. When I finally got them to come out they said I was stupid and let the vandal go.
Fuck the police.
Yes, that's a sure sign that that copy would kill somebody for evidence. You nailed it.
I don't frequently see eye to eye with Mr. Drinkypoo, but whoever marked this post as a troll is afraid of reality. Stop it. He's making an accurate, correct observation. Don't like? Then you don't like actual history, and are trying to wish it away.
Slashdot Mirror
Yup, you definitely still don't get it.
It was Tennessee.
Hey, look! More of the same smug condescension that cost you nearly a thousand legislative seats, most of the governorships, both houses of congress, the White House, the Supreme Court, and the good will of millions of two-time Obama voters who turned their back on exactly your sort of vitriol. Sill haven't figured it out, huh?
Hey look, another Trump faggot pretending there's nothing to see
It's always fun to see a homophobic liberal angrily demanding that we do something for reasons that he can't even muster the intellectual honesty to describe.
Look, we know you people working for the DNC are incredibly disingenuous, vitriolic, hysterical loons. We get that. But don'to you think that your permanent misery over - despite having partisans in the DoJ and FBI doing everything possible to help her out - Hillary losing the election should give way to you spending your energy describing a clear-cut, constitutionally sound REASON you think the election should be un-done? Oh, right, I keep forgetting that your real objection is to the constitution itself. Why not just say as much? Is it because you're a coward?
As soon as they can work out the self-driving AI agile blockchain concrete we'll be all set.
Employers are under no obligation to negotiate with you. Take it or leave it. That's the fucking problem.
Why should they be? Should they be obligated to take a losing deal that ends their company, and thus provides no jobs? Who says which negotiations they must take on? Do you think YOU should be forced to negotiate until you don't get what you need out of the job? Should you be forced to work for somebody because somebody else struck a deal with them? No? Why not? Should you be able to walk away and pursue something else? Of course you should. Just like a business owner should. If they don't want to offer enough money, they won't get decent people to work for them, and they lose. What's wrong with that?
Someone is projecting, but it appears to be you.
Really? In what way, Mr. Coward? In what way, by identifying the irrationality of people thinking that a gun locked in a trunk is inherently dangerous, am I projecting? The very same people who think the gun locked in the trunk is dangerous ignore the fact that the person operating the car is far more likely - in hard, statistical terms - to kill them by poorly (or maliciously) operating the car itself.
The bigger worry about owning a gun is not that you will murder someone, but that someone will murder you.
This entire notion is nonsense. It's simply a regurgitated meme that I'll be you can't meaningfully back up with non-spun, non-angenda-driven blog entries.
In the meantime, guns are used hundreds of thousands of times a year (I'm rounding down, here - some estimates approach millions of times a year) to stop or prevent violence and harm. The biggest worry about NOT owning a gun is that you won't be able to use that tool to prevent violence done to you or someone you care about. Meanwhile, almost all murder involving guns is conducted by people not in legal possession of the gun they use.
That's scary. If your state allows people to keep guns in their trunks, why don't you move? I know I would flee that shitty state in which you live.
Almost every state allows this. The ones that don't honor the second amendment's protections also happen to have some of the worst murder rates. Is your concern that a shotgun or rifle transported in the locked trunk of your car will somehow jump out and start killing people? I've noticed that the people who most often react with your sort of irrational nonsense are generally projecting - they know that they, personally, aren't stable people.
Amazon already delivers to pickup lockers in many locations. Walk up, flash your barcode or type in a key and your locker pops open. You can also drop off returns in the same way. Many of these are 24x7 operations.
It's amazing how much amazon has access to your stuff, isn't it?
Did you give them access to your car's remote operations? No? Amazing!
Sure, but when will we finally have Autonomous AI Crypto Blockchain Graphene? And what good is a sheet of graphene if we don't have 3D Printed Open Source Universal Basic Graphene for all?
It's not THE PHONES. It's the services, information, data, tools, communication, maps and other things one gets to through that device that are the issue. People aren't addicted to their phones. They're addicted to their social contacts, to the news, to the novel they're reading, to the weather forecast, and such. Before those phones, they'd have been "addicted" to the AM radio while they were driving, they folded map they looked at, the printed novel they gazed at over lunch, the stock pages in the newspaper, the tabloid paper they picked up at the grocery store, and all of those other analogs.
How much novel reading or stock research is healthy? It's not the phones, just like it's not the guns, and not the spoons.
Translation: "I'm talking out of my ass because I'm a Trump voter and we're the best at it."
Translation: "I'm a Shillary who anonymously posts lazy ad hominem instead of actually addressing the point raised, because I hope that other lazy liberals will get distracted mentally cheering me on and forget to do a little homework and see that the person I'm pretending to scold is actually correct."
Cambridge Analyitica paid Facebook a lot of money
On this, and much about how you're characterizing this, you're simply incorrect. Get some basic facts:
https://medium.com/@CKava/why-...
You can always tell when a liberal is thinking about Trump, because they start talking about their sexual proclivities. For some reason, they always see Trump through the lens of some sort of homoerotic fantasy. Fascinating.
Well, sure. Because people who do much less than what she did in the way of mishandling classified information, lying about it, destroying records under subpoena and the like ... go to jail. So, yes, she should have been locked up. Because she did things that required prosecution and conviction, and people far less guilty get exactly that treatment. This, as opposed to the phony "collusion" narrative being pitched by her camp in yet another way to try to explain away her election loss.
Typically, primitive people don't kill each other in great numbers. That normally requires outside influence.
So, you're calling the people who invented many of the features of our contemporary math and astronomy ... "primitive?"
That's it! Quick! Change the subject instead of addressing the response to your BS assertion! You sure are a predictable little coward.
White America has deliberately caused that violence
Oh, you mean with our secret time travel technology? That must be how "white Americans" went back in time and caused tribes in Africa to develop elaborate warrior castes and kill each other in huge numbers. Our secret time travel system must be how we caused the middle eastern cultures to begin slaughtering each other for centuries before the US existed. Sectarian hate and grudge slaughter in the middle east dates back hundreds and hundreds of years, and hasn't let up, ever. Your own eagerness to display your ignorance of history, as usual, is a separate matter. Or, more likely, you know you're lying and are hoping nobody notices because you're a coward.
Her website ... Looks like what I'd expect if the Timecube author took up veganism.
Well, a lot of vegan recipes call for cubed tofu, tomatoes, and squash. It's all in the cubes.
And the mass majority of gun violence IN THE WORLD in the last decade is mainly by white Americans
Not even close. Tally up the mass murders in African and the Middle East, where people local to those regions slaughter each other in enormous numbers, and you'll see that ... never mind, you know you were lying. Stop it.
Doesn't California now consider anything with "Coffee" in the name to be a carcinogen?
This has to be a stupid lawsuit by lawyers with nothing better to do and need to get their name out there.
No, it's an opportunity at getting a healthy percentage of a large pile of FB's cash, right when FB will be doing its best to dole out money in every direction possible to beat back recent bad PR. The people suing them are in it strictly for personal enrichment.
Same here. I tracked down a vandal, smashing windshields, because the cops didn't care. When I finally got them to come out they said I was stupid and let the vandal go.
Fuck the police.
Yes, that's a sure sign that that copy would kill somebody for evidence. You nailed it.
I don't frequently see eye to eye with Mr. Drinkypoo, but whoever marked this post as a troll is afraid of reality. Stop it. He's making an accurate, correct observation. Don't like? Then you don't like actual history, and are trying to wish it away.