READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE. ICE is the twunt... yes that ICE.
The website was seized by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. O'Dywer was arrested on May 23, brought to Wandsworth prison and then released on a £3,000 bail paid by his aunt.
I assume the US wants him extradited so he can face prosecution HERE.
watch the movie. you can get the drugs anytime (with a scrip). you're assigned a counselor, and your family is involved in the decision as well. they WILL NOT let you kill yourself if you are not of sound mind. you have to take the drugs under your own power (no doctor assist like Kevorkian) you drink the meds.
I don't think Alzheimers patients would qualify in advanced stages, but the people in the show were:
1) woman with terminal cancer 2) old man..wanted to die on his terms 3) guy with cancer whos HMO would not cover treatment. only palliative care.
here's a hint. the answer to your question is in the article
"The researchers decided to try out a new technology: a tiny fiber-optic oxygen sensor called an optode. Only 15 micrometers in diameter, the optode was small enough not to rupture the diving bell when the researchers poked it through the webby membrane and measured how gases move across the bell's surface. The bell, they found, functions like a gill: As the spider removes oxygen from the bell by breathing it in, more oxygen flows in to take its place. This gives the spider a constant oxygen supply without requiring it to venture to the surface often. But after about 24 hours.....
"They started feeding wrong answers to the accused cheaters and called campus security."
I'm thinking campus security not only enforces the law, but the rules in the student handbook as well. Cheating is probably listed as an offense in the handbook, thus the "charges"
Yes. The Google version of Android (meaning pure/unadulterated) should allow you to remove whatever you want, but since it's open, the hardware manufacturers/carriers are allowed to make any changes they want to the OS including shovelware
can't avoid the banks getting it (aside from not using credit cards) but I don't need to let google in on it as well.
imagine what they could grock if chrome is your browser of choice.. as soon as you use your phone @ home on wifi - there's a possibilty they could tie your surfing habits to your shopping habits.
privacy concerns aside - what's the advantage of waving your phone over the sensor vs. swiping your card through the POS machine?
what I meant was no devs have paid lodsys yet, so there's no need for Apple to comepnsate.
if lodsys wins, the apple can just reduce their cut of the inapp purchase to compenstate the developers.
but it looks like APPL is of the opinion that their license covers devs as well.
if that's apple's opinion, and they lose the case, there's no need for devs to fight independently, since their argument will have been rendered moot by the court's decision against apple. either way, appl has covered the devs. they can't leave the devs to pay - that's bad PR and bad business because the devs used the API in good faith.
When company hires a law firm to represent them.. that FIRM IS them.. (you're speaking on their behalf in a court of law).. that's why you hire lawyers.. to represent you.
the fact that Apple employees don't get to see it is secondary - all it guards against is Apple possibly taking queues from the Sammy's next iterations.
Apple didn't "request" anything. The judge saw enough graphical evidence in apple's case, she decided a "preview" was in order.
"Without expressing an opinion on the merits of Apple's claims, the court acknowledged that "Apple has produced images of Samsung products and other evidence that provide a reasonable basis for Apple's belief that Samsung's new products are designed to mimic Apple's products."
imdenify = Compensate (someone) for harm or loss: "insurance carried to indemnify the owner for loss"
AFAIK - nobody has paid lodsys yet.. compensation isn't in play.
if Apple caves, it sets a dangerous precendent.. the dollars are irrelevant. this is about priniple. @less than $6000 per million in income.. the "fee schedule" is designed to get devs to pay because $6k is nothing compared to 1M... BUT if Apple doesn't fight, EVERY SINGLE APP DEV with in app purchases is subject to infrigement. and nevermind the part where apple makes 30% off of in app sales.
seems the court is already on Apple's side: "As the Supreme Court has made clear, “[t]he authorized sale of an article that substantially embodies a patent exhausts the patent holder’s rights and prevents the patent holder from invoking patent law to control postsale use of the article.” Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Elecs., Inc., 553 U.S. 617 (2008)."
FWIW.. from what I read yesterday (too lazy to find it now). some of those reporting the problem on either console say there are no problems with any other games. (they tested after the LANoir crash.) - same dusty old console, but only one title causes a freeze. OTOH, some with older consoles reporting no problems at all.
maybe your "shaving" is a SEAsia thing because here in the US, I took the SIM from my US Blackberry (same carrier) and put it in my 1st gen iphone w/o shaving anything, then I jailbroke it and put another SIM from another carrier to test the jailbreak... again - didn't shave anything.
"By neglecting to build a failsafe into the systems he administered, allowing other people to gain access in case he were sacked or incapacitated. The old "hit by a bus" rule. He had EVERY responsibility, obligation, and freedom to set up such a system, and he opted not to. That makes him, at best, an incompetent admin, no matter how gifted he is with configuring and troubleshooting the boxes."..and THREE YEARS LATER, they still have a SPOF - that fire was LAST MONTH. nobody fixed the problem.. one would think that after an incident like this, they would have modified procedures - incompetence persits.
call it whatever you want, but I believe hismotive for holding the pwd was reasonable: he was protecting the integrity of the system because he was surrounded by incompetence. case in point:
in April, during a fire, emergency system crashed. they couldn't bring it back up because nobody had the password. 50 people lost their apartments. http://my.firefighternation.com/forum/topics/review-finds-san-franciscos emergency services responds with: "That's what we have pencils and paper for." Childs didn't have the same password, but he's obvioulsy surrounded by incompetence - all systems are managed by the same IT dept. Childs had the pwd to the mainframe.. that kind of access should be guarded, but the password they needed for emergency services was for the god damn internet - that one should be written down in the "how to bring the system back up" documentation.
so slashdotters... what would your CIO say if you respond with "that's what we have pencils and paper for" when a mission critical system crashes and you can't restore service because you don't know what to type after your ID?
Slashdot Mirror
READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE.
ICE is the twunt... yes that ICE.
The website was seized by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement. O'Dywer was arrested on May 23, brought to Wandsworth prison and then released on a £3,000 bail paid by his aunt.
I assume the US wants him extradited so he can face prosecution HERE.
watch the movie. you can get the drugs anytime (with a scrip). you're assigned a counselor, and your family is involved in the decision as well. they WILL NOT let you kill yourself if you are not of sound mind. you have to take the drugs under your own power (no doctor assist like Kevorkian) you drink the meds.
I don't think Alzheimers patients would qualify in advanced stages, but the people in the show were:
1) woman with terminal cancer
2) old man..wanted to die on his terms
3) guy with cancer whos HMO would not cover treatment. only palliative care.
dying with dignity is not the same as suicide.
Watch it, and make up your own mind.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1715802/
here's a hint. the answer to your question is in the article
"The researchers decided to try out a new technology: a tiny fiber-optic oxygen sensor called an optode. Only 15 micrometers in diameter, the optode was small enough not to rupture the diving bell when the researchers poked it through the webby membrane and measured how gases move across the bell's surface. The bell, they found, functions like a gill: As the spider removes oxygen from the bell by breathing it in, more oxygen flows in to take its place. This gives the spider a constant oxygen supply without requiring it to venture to the surface often. But after about 24 hours.....
if someone hacked Apple/iTunes.. I doubt they'd keep it quiet.
with 200 MILLION credit cards, a hell of a lot more people would have seen this if it were a hack.
10 bucks says this guy has a common username and password.
where the hell have you been?
"In its first formal cyber strategy, the Pentagon has concluded that computer sabotage by another country could constitute an act of war"
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43224451/ns/us_news-security/t/sources-us-decides-cyber-attack-can-be-act-war/
"They started feeding wrong answers to the accused cheaters and called campus security."
I'm thinking campus security not only enforces the law, but the rules in the student handbook as well. Cheating is probably listed as an offense in the handbook, thus the "charges"
well, 17 of those are from me.. so don't get too excited.
they have stickers?
"something like this would just be unthinkable in reality since they'd of course analyze how I got in and seal that security hole"
putting the cap back on the toothpaste prevents more from coming out, but it doesn't clean up the mess on the counter.
WTF Patriot Act? Hacking was illegal prior to 9/11
Yes. The Google version of Android (meaning pure/unadulterated) should allow you to remove whatever you want, but since it's open, the hardware manufacturers/carriers are allowed to make any changes they want to the OS including shovelware
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/07/bloatware-android-phones/
except google could also get the info.
can't avoid the banks getting it (aside from not using credit cards) but I don't need to let google in on it as well.
imagine what they could grock if chrome is your browser of choice.. as soon as you use your phone @ home on wifi - there's a possibilty they could tie your surfing habits to your shopping habits.
privacy concerns aside - what's the advantage of waving your phone over the sensor vs. swiping your card through the POS machine?
what I meant was no devs have paid lodsys yet, so there's no need for Apple to comepnsate.
if lodsys wins, the apple can just reduce their cut of the inapp purchase to compenstate the developers.
but it looks like APPL is of the opinion that their license covers devs as well.
if that's apple's opinion, and they lose the case, there's no need for devs to fight independently, since their argument will have been rendered moot by the court's decision against apple. either way, appl has covered the devs. they can't leave the devs to pay - that's bad PR and bad business because the devs used the API in good faith.
I think legally it's correct (enough)
When company hires a law firm to represent them.. that FIRM IS them.. (you're speaking on their behalf in a court of law).. that's why you hire lawyers.. to represent you.
the fact that Apple employees don't get to see it is secondary - all it guards against is Apple possibly taking queues from the Sammy's next iterations.
Apple didn't "request" anything. The judge saw enough graphical evidence in apple's case, she decided a "preview" was in order.
"Without expressing an opinion on the merits of Apple's claims, the court acknowledged that "Apple has produced images of Samsung products and other evidence that provide a reasonable basis for Apple's belief that Samsung's new products are designed to mimic Apple's products."
there's an image from APPLs filing here:
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/11/05/24/samsung_ordered_to_show_its_new_prototypes_to_apple.html
imdenify = Compensate (someone) for harm or loss: "insurance carried to indemnify the owner for loss"
AFAIK - nobody has paid lodsys yet.. compensation isn't in play.
if Apple caves, it sets a dangerous precendent.. the dollars are irrelevant. this is about priniple. @less than $6000 per million in income.. the "fee schedule" is designed to get devs to pay because $6k is nothing compared to 1M... BUT if Apple doesn't fight, EVERY SINGLE APP DEV with in app purchases is subject to infrigement. and nevermind the part where apple makes 30% off of in app sales.
seems the court is already on Apple's side: "As the Supreme Court has made clear, “[t]he authorized sale of an article that substantially embodies a patent exhausts the patent holder’s rights and prevents the patent holder from invoking patent law to control postsale use of the article.” Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Elecs., Inc., 553 U.S. 617 (2008)."
full text of the letter: http://www.macworld.com/article/160031/2011/05/apple_legal_lodsys_letter_text.html
what happens if you feed the stray cat in your neigborhood? you become the cats bitch. same thing if you feed the trolls.
yes because there's no such thing as an off grid PV solar battery array
nope.
http://hardysolar.com/solar-battery/solar-battery-bank-26300-watt.html
what should i wear?
FWIW.. from what I read yesterday (too lazy to find it now). some of those reporting the problem on either console say there are no problems with any other games. (they tested after the LANoir crash.) - same dusty old console, but only one title causes a freeze. OTOH, some with older consoles reporting no problems at all.
you can buy a non ATT micoSIM for a j/b 4 or ipad
http://www.amazon.com/T-Mobile-stick-together-Micro-SIM-pre-paid/dp/B003PQHMEI
maybe your "shaving" is a SEAsia thing because here in the US, I took the SIM from my US Blackberry (same carrier) and put it in my 1st gen iphone w/o shaving anything, then I jailbroke it and put another SIM from another carrier to test the jailbreak... again - didn't shave anything.
"By neglecting to build a failsafe into the systems he administered, allowing other people to gain access in case he were sacked or incapacitated. The old "hit by a bus" rule. He had EVERY responsibility, obligation, and freedom to set up such a system, and he opted not to. That makes him, at best, an incompetent admin, no matter how gifted he is with configuring and troubleshooting the boxes." ..and THREE YEARS LATER, they still have a SPOF - that fire was LAST MONTH. nobody fixed the problem.. one would think that after an incident like this, they would have modified procedures - incompetence persits.
part of it? how?
he's in fucking jail yet the administrators still can't login to the web?
SPOF? what if he was the only person QUALIFIED to run the system.. ?
http://news.oreilly.com/2008/07/coverage-of-terry-childs.html
call it whatever you want, but I believe hismotive for holding the pwd was reasonable: he was protecting the integrity of the system because he was surrounded by incompetence. case in point:
in April, during a fire, emergency system crashed. they couldn't bring it back up because nobody had the password. 50 people lost their apartments.
http://my.firefighternation.com/forum/topics/review-finds-san-franciscos
emergency services responds with: "That's what we have pencils and paper for."
Childs didn't have the same password, but he's obvioulsy surrounded by incompetence - all systems are managed by the same IT dept. Childs had the pwd to the mainframe.. that kind of access should be guarded, but the password they needed for emergency services was for the god damn internet - that one should be written down in the "how to bring the system back up" documentation.
so slashdotters... what would your CIO say if you respond with "that's what we have pencils and paper for" when a mission critical system crashes and you can't restore service because you don't know what to type after your ID?