Funny, in America, giving an organ to another person is the gift of life. Life is precious, and we should all do what is necessary to preserve it.
But, getting an abortion is just fine.
If anything, I am sure this guy has done at least one thing wrong.
But a child in the womb is the only class of human who is truly "innocent".
I guess if it weren't for hypocrisy, America would not exist. But hey, we have Starbucks(TM), so life must be dandy.
How about we start putting money and energy to help those women who get pregnant. To give them support, instead of badgering them that they "fucked up". But no, that would require that America to be responsible, and responsibility is just doesn't pay off.
People complain being brain washed is a horrible, but we brain wash ourselves by being convinced that a fetus is not a human, while seconds later, they magically become human.
Its not like a women getting pregnant is something "new". If anything, man has shown his ill ability to adapt by not being able to cope with the necessities of life for all this time.
Just lets you know how easily it is for people to get inebriated off of freedom. Our for-fathers would be proud.
Each day 16 people die waiting for organs. Each day America kills 4,100 children with a vacuum.
We bitch, moan and complain that those with the power to take away our freedom should not, as it is against what America stands for. Then we give certain people the title of "not yet being human" and kill them for our convince, as we have the power to take away their freedom, and see nothing as being amiss.
This man getting a liver is a good thing. How about we starting hanging billboards, telling people to give the gift of life to children that people consented to, but then decided to renege on the deal. Maybe before we start thinking that life is a good thing, we should stop treating it like an STD.
Just remember how much of a hypocrite we really are when the next plane flies toward your office building.
will turn it on to watch the news, if I know something interesting or important is on. But, besides that, it is just always off. If I want to watch Simpson's, I get the series on DVD. Just like I do with 24. Having so much to watch at any time, just gives you reason not to move.
If you leave the TV off, you actually start thinking more too. TV is all about being told something. Believe THIS, Buy THAT. Start reading or actually go outside and "gasp" talk to other people.
TV is okay, but to the extent that it is used in America saddens me. It shows that people really are complacent, and just do not really want to think.
I'd like to see you play defense in bowling. Or golf. I'll bring the camera, you bring the ambulance.
You prove the point again.
Golf and bowling are not sports. Although I like both, I can honestly tell myself that they are just games, not sports, just games. Like playing Rubik's cube.
Honesty is paramount when dealing with children if you want them to have the tools to survive.
Goddamn, I guess lying about Santa Clause was a bad idea.
The problem with that idea is that it takes into the account that parents will always know what their children are doing at all times (which unless you are training your kid to live in Airstrip 1, will stop him from growing into a healthy minded adult).
Now, my parents could have violated all of my freedoms, and had me grow up without friends, but they didn't. Sometimes as a parent you need to let your kid go off on his own while still knowing there is some form of control for him. Restricting violent games to adults doesn't stop adults from buying them, so it lets parents choose to buy them for their children. However, if a parent wants to buy them for their children, then that's fine by me.
Kids need to grow up onto laws, and so as they get older have less laws. This acclimates them to what is right and wrong.
Now, when you become a adult (or when the government states that you are an adult) then the rules no longer apply.
Also to black mariah, I take BANNING them as to saying that if my kid of 13 wants a violent game, that I cannot buy it for him which removes my rights as a parent. Banning and Restricting are two different terms. Also I take vagueness, the orginal problem with the bill to mean that it could remove the right for me to buy said games for my children.
And yes, the government is not your friend. The government is a tool. Nothing more and nothing less. Laws are tools, and if not sharpened properly--meaning vagueness--then they are likely to inflict harm upon their owner.
Although (if you read my other post) I am against what Washington did, to play Devils Advocate, this is my side to their idea.
The lives of police are not worth more then others, but technically the police are a psychological symbol of (that's right) enforcement. If you can kill the people who are meant to stop you from killing people, then all the others must be like goats for the slaughter.
Like it or not, the popo have an enormous amount of psychological respect--Due to being institutionalized into their legal authority--within America. Think about it, how many other people to you stop your car to? Killing them, symbolizes killing that authority.
Banning titles is indeed a bad idea, but (as previously stated by another person) restricting them is fine by me. Parents do need to work at raising their children, but the government needs to give them the tools to do so. If a law requires people to be 18 to buy "Cop Killah" games, then it gets my vote. But, banning such games is indeed against how I interpret the constitution. Let parents choose how to raise their children while stopping children from choosing how to raise themselves. As always a happy medium shows good results. Sometimes, adults also need to vent.
Requiring credentials doesn't impact freedom (if you play your cards right, you will someday be 18 too). Washington took it too far, seems it is getting on the right track again.
Slashdot Mirror
Funny, in America, giving an organ to another person is the gift of life. Life is precious, and we should all do what is necessary to preserve it.
But, getting an abortion is just fine.
If anything, I am sure this guy has done at least one thing wrong.
But a child in the womb is the only class of human who is truly "innocent".
I guess if it weren't for hypocrisy, America would not exist. But hey, we have Starbucks(TM), so life must be dandy.
How about we start putting money and energy to help those women who get pregnant. To give them support, instead of badgering them that they "fucked up". But no, that would require that America to be responsible, and responsibility is just doesn't pay off.
People complain being brain washed is a horrible, but we brain wash ourselves by being convinced that a fetus is not a human, while seconds later, they magically become human.
Its not like a women getting pregnant is something "new". If anything, man has shown his ill ability to adapt by not being able to cope with the necessities of life for all this time.
Just lets you know how easily it is for people to get inebriated off of freedom. Our for-fathers would be proud.
Each day 16 people die waiting for organs. Each day America kills 4,100 children with a vacuum.
We bitch, moan and complain that those with the power to take away our freedom should not, as it is against what America stands for. Then we give certain people the title of "not yet being human" and kill them for our convince, as we have the power to take away their freedom, and see nothing as being amiss.
This man getting a liver is a good thing. How about we starting hanging billboards, telling people to give the gift of life to children that people consented to, but then decided to renege on the deal. Maybe before we start thinking that life is a good thing, we should stop treating it like an STD.
Just remember how much of a hypocrite we really are when the next plane flies toward your office building.
Sadly, the Air Force is cutting people too. The whole "Force Shaping" thing is kind of a bummer.
I guess a good perk would be for the company to buy my plane ticket to India when they outsource my job there.
Language classes would be good too.
will turn it on to watch the news, if I know something interesting or important is on. But, besides that, it is just always off. If I want to watch Simpson's, I get the series on DVD. Just like I do with 24. Having so much to watch at any time, just gives you reason not to move.
If you leave the TV off, you actually start thinking more too. TV is all about being told something. Believe THIS, Buy THAT. Start reading or actually go outside and "gasp" talk to other people.
TV is okay, but to the extent that it is used in America saddens me. It shows that people really are complacent, and just do not really want to think.
I'd like to see you play defense in bowling. Or golf. I'll bring the camera, you bring the ambulance.
You prove the point again.
Golf and bowling are not sports. Although I like both, I can honestly tell myself that they are just games, not sports, just games. Like playing Rubik's cube.
Honesty is paramount when dealing with children if you want them to have the tools to survive. Goddamn, I guess lying about Santa Clause was a bad idea.
The problem with that idea is that it takes into the account that parents will always know what their children are doing at all times (which unless you are training your kid to live in Airstrip 1, will stop him from growing into a healthy minded adult). Now, my parents could have violated all of my freedoms, and had me grow up without friends, but they didn't. Sometimes as a parent you need to let your kid go off on his own while still knowing there is some form of control for him. Restricting violent games to adults doesn't stop adults from buying them, so it lets parents choose to buy them for their children. However, if a parent wants to buy them for their children, then that's fine by me. Kids need to grow up onto laws, and so as they get older have less laws. This acclimates them to what is right and wrong. Now, when you become a adult (or when the government states that you are an adult) then the rules no longer apply. Also to black mariah, I take BANNING them as to saying that if my kid of 13 wants a violent game, that I cannot buy it for him which removes my rights as a parent. Banning and Restricting are two different terms. Also I take vagueness, the orginal problem with the bill to mean that it could remove the right for me to buy said games for my children. And yes, the government is not your friend. The government is a tool. Nothing more and nothing less. Laws are tools, and if not sharpened properly--meaning vagueness--then they are likely to inflict harm upon their owner.
Although (if you read my other post) I am against what Washington did, to play Devils Advocate, this is my side to their idea. The lives of police are not worth more then others, but technically the police are a psychological symbol of (that's right) enforcement. If you can kill the people who are meant to stop you from killing people, then all the others must be like goats for the slaughter. Like it or not, the popo have an enormous amount of psychological respect--Due to being institutionalized into their legal authority--within America. Think about it, how many other people to you stop your car to? Killing them, symbolizes killing that authority.
Banning titles is indeed a bad idea, but (as previously stated by another person) restricting them is fine by me. Parents do need to work at raising their children, but the government needs to give them the tools to do so. If a law requires people to be 18 to buy "Cop Killah" games, then it gets my vote. But, banning such games is indeed against how I interpret the constitution. Let parents choose how to raise their children while stopping children from choosing how to raise themselves. As always a happy medium shows good results. Sometimes, adults also need to vent. Requiring credentials doesn't impact freedom (if you play your cards right, you will someday be 18 too). Washington took it too far, seems it is getting on the right track again.