Slashdot Mirror


Are Job Perks Coming into Vogue Again?

Pharmboy asks: "The Register is reporting on a company that was awarded 'Best Small Company to Work for in America' by the Detroit Free Press, in part, for providing Free beer to their employees. They offer free breakfast, lunch AND dinner, gym and snacks. This sounds similar to the late 90s, where companies were offering extreme benefits to attract extreme talent, before the bubble burst and most workers were just glad to have a job. As the job market gains strength, what are companies willing to do in order to attract the best talent? Are we about to enter another era where employers are willing to make work fun again, in order to attract and keep talent? Will this have any effect on other employers, forcing them to again offer benefits to keep pace and talent? How important are these kinds of perks to the average employee anyway? What kind of perks would you have to have to switch to a job that pay the same?"

481 comments

  1. Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seriously, it seems the job market is only marginally better these days.

    1. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Jhon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Marginally better than last month? Yes. Marginally better than last year? Much better. Marginally better than 1999? Nope -- much worse.

      I think the point is that we are starting to see a return of 'perks' as an incentive for talent as the job market gets better. Not a return to dot-com boom days -- but I think that was a fluke and obviously not sustainable. It was a fun fluke, though...

    2. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Rei · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thanks for saving me the time of having to mention that. If anyone doubts you, just redirect them to a news site so that they can notice that the dow just lost almost 150 points today. In the past two days, the Dow lost 3% of its value. Since June, it has dropped 6%, and Nasdaq about 12%.

      For those who haven't been following it, the economy this year - the "big improvement" - has barely outpaced the number of new people entering the job market. And since June, it has been notably outpaced by the number of people entering the market. We not only have low job creation numbers for July (just over 30k), but they revised down the previous several months.

      It's in pretty bad shape right now... lets hope we can some day recover. :(

      --
      Pathetic humans! Prepare to write down the recipe!
    3. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      I don't know--- I have had 3 job offers in the past month, two of which came this week, and all of which offer salaries similar to those of the late 99-2000. The job market is coming back. Despite what all the doom and gloomers like to say, these things do go up and down. We're coming out of a down cycle.

      By the way- I went to my current employer and told them about my offer. They are countering. Oh yes, the job market is back (I am a software engineer).

    4. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      It's in pretty bad shape right now... lets hope we can some day recover. :(

      Wow are you short-sighted.

      It was pretty bad in 2001. It sucked in 2002. It was still shit in 2003. 2004 has been a good year.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    5. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by seestheday · · Score: 1

      I'm still getting paid less now as a 2nd year database developer than I did as a 4-month co-op student junior programmer (before the bubble burst) .

    6. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The growth rate is down. Today's big news. Seems funny that this appears on Slashdot. Google News.

    7. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Stock market is being hammered by oil prices. Supply is adequate but there are concerns that drive up the price. Like the Russian Gov't basically trying to Nationalize the Russian Oil Industry. It's a little known fact that Russia is about 20% of the worlds supply right now. That is slack that OPEC can't make up even if it wanted to. So when it costs you more to do one thing (drive) you do less of another. Job market is OK for folks at my level (20+ yrs IT/software) but the pay scale is about like 1998. I'm looking around right now as my contract is up in September.

    8. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The expression coming into vogue means "to become popular or fashionable". That said, I think a means of earning money will not lose its popularity any time soon.

    9. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      The articles I've read said they're supplying 2% of the worlds oil supply.

    10. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by parliboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Small problem with the statisic. Thousands of high school and college graduates finishing and May and June, and we're suprised about the number of new jobseekers outpacing new jobs in the last month or two? Come on now, be fair.

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    11. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      Of course for the few that work at OSDN or whatever they are calling themselves these days (how about 503.com?), these things have never been an issue... It's clear from the server preformence, free beer has never been an issue.

      Come on, it's a joke.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    12. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The figures are seasonally adjusted.

    13. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by twiddlingbits · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/russia.html says Russia is the Worlds Second Largest Producer. Yukos, the company that the Russian Gov't is "investigating" itself is 2% of the Worlds Supply. The company accounts for about 20 percent of Russia's total oil production of 9.26 million barrels per day in June. http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/business/ 2722653 Yukos produces about 2 percent of the world's oil, and fears that its exports could be disrupted have contributed to a spike in world oil prices. Below is a quote from http://www.ipaa.org/govtrelations/factsheets/Under standingWorldPetro.asp Russia's role has become a linchpin to the course of future crude oil supply politics. It is now the second largest oil producer in the world - trailing only Saudi Arabia. Its crude oil production has increased by more than 900,000 barrels per day since January 2000. This increase has essentially offset the reductions OPEC has made to stabilize crude oil supply. Without significant action by Russia to reduce its production, the world risks an oil price war that can result in adverse consequences to both global and national security. I also found a presentation from BP from 2001-2002 that showed a graph that Russa was supplying 10-12% at that time. Since then they have increased share, since they will sell at LOWER prices than the OPEC cartel. I think I have enough data to support my point.

    14. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by deanj · · Score: 1

      Wait a sec... you mean all those jobs on Monster.com and HotJobs.com that employers (not agencies...I never trust them) are posting are FAKE?

      People can't go out and interview for them? ...Or is it that they're not willing to move or to take those jobs, even if it means not getting a pay check.

      The jobs are out there folks. One of them might not be your DREAM job, but it's a job that'll get those paychecks coming in while you look for a better one.

    15. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Unregistered · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hush. Don't ruin Bush's facade. Because that would be unamerican. terrorist.

    16. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, it's actually demand that is the real reason for the sharp rise in prices(that and the fact that refining capability in the US needs serious improvement). Well, to a certain extent a weak dollar because America just can't send dollars overseas fast enough. China went from being a net exporter to a net importer of oil rather recently, and demand from India has shot through the roof. This is the other side of the equation that most "free trade causes lower prices!"crowd won't tell you about. Steel prices are also quite high right now, as are pretty much all commodoties.
      This is the problem wtih measuring "efficiency" in dollars alone, it doesn't tell the whole story. You usually use more resources sending manufacturing to China or code outsourcing in India. This really isn't a fault of the workers, it's the way the system works. Chinese manufacturers are very inefficient(though this is changing), there is no real motivation to do so. You have a lot more people working on the product, plus all the extra overhead required for shipping. This is a hidden cost because of China's fixed exchange policy. Sure, widget X is cheaper, but guess what, the gas you use to go to the Wal-Mart to buy widget X and the steel in that car are much more expensive.
      The only way for the US to be sucessful with it's current trade policies is to become energy independent. Otherwise, the weakening of the dollar through mass imports will cause an energy crisis when people stop accepting the dollar as currency.

    17. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      Yup, you're correct. My confusion about Yukos and Russian oil production.

      Could you explain how a company producing 2% of the world oil could increase the price of oil so much?

      I'm sure if say, Rolling Rock quit making beer it wouldn't change the prices of beer. Not sure what percent RR makes of beer production, just using it as an example.

      And another thing, do the Russian oil companies trade in American dollars or Euros? I've read the story about Iraq and Venezuala being ignored when they used the dollar, but problems arose as they switched to trading in Euros. I don't know much about world economics, as if my prior post about Yukos didn't prove that to you.

    18. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes lets be fair and remember that the stats only count those requesting unemployment. So all those that has used all of their unemployment is thankfully not included.
      Where would we be if the numbers were accurate and included all those actually unemployed?

    19. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by twiddlingbits · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Right now there isn't a lot of slack in the market 2% less in the market means the market can't absorb current demand so the price goes up to stiffle demand. Lower supply with equal demand always means higher price. The big thing is the worry that Yukos is just the tip of the iceberg and the Russin Gov't may go after other oil companies. Privitization has increased Russian oil production about 5X in the last 15 yrs, and I think there are some fears that if things are nationalized that production will decrease. Also, this is the time of year that refineries start producing more fuel oil for winter but also have to keep gasoline stocks up for the rest of the summer which means the demand increases a bit now. Add in the fact that China has all of a sudden gotten oil hungry, that very little new domestic production is available in the USA, the North Sea is about maxed out, and any deepwater work in Africa is 5-10 yrs from market and expect the high prices to continue. Add in Iraq and terrorists and you got almost chaos. Everyone who trades oil watches all these situations 24x7 and tries to make money off negative situations, real or imagined. Russian oil companies are not listed on any American stock exchanges if that is what you mean. THe price of oil is set in dollars, what currency you pay in just has to be adjusted for it's value relative to the US dollar and that's the price in that currency. In Euros the price is less than in dollars but a Euro is worth more than a dollar conversely, oil in Canadian dollars is higher as the Canadian dollar is only worth about 60 -70% of a US dollar. If you are interested in all this, you can learn about it. /. might not be the BEST place but you do get some good stuff here. A course or two in International Business (or a book or two) would let you learn a lot and help you sort out the nonsense you hear from press and politicians from the facts.

    20. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Yeah.

      I work at healthnet in woodland hills.

      We have a job posting (july 14) and are still 2 people short.

      And I mean SHORT!!!

      So look it up on monster, apply.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    21. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jobs are not coming into vogue again. I have been speaking to folks fresh back from a fact-finding tour in India. Jobs are going to India ALOT FASTER than anyone here really gets. and canada, and russia, etc..

      http://www.profitpuppy.com/freelance-sites.htm

      technical editing, graphic design, as well as the famous call centers and programming.

    22. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by kisrael · · Score: 1

      I gotta ask...what's your skillset that's in such hot demand? What's your resume like, how hard have you been looking?

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    23. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by foidulus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes lets be fair and remember that the stats only count those requesting unemployment. So all those that has used all of their unemployment is thankfully not included.
      That isn't how unemployment is counted, you have to be looking for work in order to be counted as unemployed. That is really regardless of whether or not your benefits run out.
      It's actually a bit more complicated, there is the underemployed catagory which rarely gets discussed but is still important. A person is considered underemployed if they are looking for full time but can only get part time, or if they are working at a job which is far below their abilities, ie a programmer working in retail.
      You can have somewhat low unemployent(like we have now, actually the unemployment rate is not that far above what most economists consider the nominal 5%) but have large numbers of discouraged workers and underemployed. The effect on the economy and people's lives is still felt, but the politicians can gloat because they "lowered unemployment". This recovery is especially recovering jobs in the underemployed catagory. There are a lot of temps being hired, and whether or not they will ever get to full time is up in the air.

    24. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by yasth · · Score: 1

      You forgot, where are you? The economyy moves at different paces in differnet places, and also in some places the whole boom thing never really got around to raising wages so 99-2000 compensation was not that out of line.

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    25. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by jhylkema · · Score: 1

      You forgot the hundreds of thousands of legal immigrant guest workers let in under the pretext of a "labor shortage."

    26. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      Woodland...hills.

      Yeah, And I've work for a company that's dying for programmers. It's located in Springfield.

      Look it up.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    27. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Nurf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You forgot the hundreds of thousands of legal immigrant guest workers let in under the pretext of a "labor shortage."

      Heh. The funny thing is that I am one of those workers, and I can't keep people from offering me jobs at pretty nice salaries ($100K/year or so). It's quite annoying really, having people phone you all the time and try to get you to work for them. I hate turning people down.

      It's become a lot worse in the last 6 months or so.

      I feel no shame. I am more expensive than an American and there is severe pain getting visas for me, and yet people are still competing to hire me. If an American in the same field can't get a job, the problem is not me.

      I will be moving to a new job next month, and I expect my job to directly add at least another 2 jobs to the market in the next year (I'll need minions). Go philanthropist me!

      --
      ---
    28. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by caswelmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yup, that's what happens. As people bitch about not having a job, someone like you comes along and works their arse off to make something of themself. Imagine that, working hard to improve your life and that of your family.

      You know what folks, the parent is the real American. He/she realizes that noone hands anything to you. They work their butt off to make something of themself and if the job market turns bad (here's a thought) they work harder.

      Funny, I'm a young engineer and my company is laying people off. Yet, somehow they keep me around. I wonder if it's because I EARN MY KEEP.

      Sorry, just a little conservative ranting. :^)

    29. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by jrockway · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sorry about the OT random reply, but look at your obfuscated email:

      gene@teaCOFFEEmtri.com minus caffeine

      you have tea and coffee in there... which caffeine do I remove :-)

      What were the odds that your address would get split there and that the de-obfuscating recipe would call for the removal of it :)

      Sorry, I just found that amusing.

      --
      My other car is first.
    30. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by parliboy · · Score: 1

      Well, I generally use a non-caffeinated tea from Celestial Seasonings. So that narrows down your choices nicely. On second look: A gmail account. Bastard...

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    31. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by jrockway · · Score: 2

      I don't want to sound like an ass here, but if you have such a problem with slashdot, why don't you just leave? Your sig claims that Kuro5hin is "News for nerds. Stuff that matters.", so why not just go there and forget about how much slashdot sucks?

      I hate to point this out all the time, but nobody is forcing anyone to read slashdot. If you haven't paid for it, and you're not satisfied, then that's really your own damn problem. If you do like slashdot, subscribe and then maybe people will be happier to hear your feedback?

      --
      My other car is first.
    32. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but you are out of kilter. Economy must produce approximately 150,000 jobs per month - not everyone who graduates highschool and college goes immediately into job market (vacation, grad school, military, trust fund, slackerville, etc., etc., etc.). June number of "job creation" (which includes one-day only temp jobs) was only 32,000. Look at "actual" (revised) numbers for every month since January for 2004 - really bad!

    33. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      You are right on target and a sane voice in a sea of quirkiness. Anyone who thinks jobs are coming back into vogue hasn't been keeping with the either the numbers or current events. The job market is shrinking dramatically, Ballmer at M$ is gurgling with excitement at the prospect of falling prices for all tech labor, and the long-term prospects for the US are dismal. Any questions?

    34. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A course or two in International Business (or a book or two) would let you learn a lot and help you sort out the nonsense you hear from press and politicians from the facts.
      Have any book recommendations?
    35. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Gigantic1 · · Score: 1
      Earn your keep?

      Naw....your just young, cheap and willing to drink the corporate Koolaid - management's cheap, little sycophant. Wait until you get some experience and start making some serious money, and then see how long you last.

    36. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I leave in 2 months to try to ride a motorcycle round the world, so I don't have the time to take a class or read about international business right now. At least I'll experience it. There was a response from an Anon Cow asking for book recommendations though.

      I didn't mean Euro vs. US dollar as far as currency conversion for the price of oil. I've read about US dollars being fiat currency and how countries might start switching to Euros. The fear was US dollars would start coming back to the US causing inflation. Examples given were Venezuala and Iraq. They switched, and it was working for them until recent problems arose. Just curious what you think about the US dollar being fiat currency.

      Thanks for answering my questions by the way.

    37. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Assuming you are not a troll - dude, toss some of those jobs *my* way! I've been looking for over a year for a new job (fortunately still employed, but underemployed nevertheless). I have IT friends working retail, as waitresses, driving limos - no opportunties to be had, unless you are looking for a 3 month no benefit contract somwehere in the middle-of-nowhere. Even the recruiters have given up - they have no jobs to offer.

    38. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Woodland Hills, California. It's in the greater Los Angeles Area, in the San Fernando valley.
      Look it up...

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    39. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clueless Slashdolt poster sited:

      "You know what folks, the parent is the real American. He/she realizes that noone hands anything to you. They work their butt off to make something of themself and if the job market turns bad (here's a thought) they work harder."

      Uhhh...DUH! Single people work more hours than any parent I have ever seen. Working their butt off my ASS! Try coming in late every day and saying "oh...the baby kept me up all night again" and then going HOME EARLY ALSO. Parent...fuck you and your parent bullshit you clueless drone!

    40. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hardly think this guy is cheap at $100K/year. I'm sure management could find someone (american) just as talanted as he for less.

    41. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Nurf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Assuming you are not a troll - dude, toss some of those jobs *my* way!

      Nope. Not a troll. I can't really toss them your way though - they're a little specialised. I can tell you how I got into the position I am in, though.

      This assumes you are in a place with a reasonable population. I live in Seattle, but any city will probably do. I prefer to work for small companies and do interesting stuff. In this space, word of mouth and referrals are everything.

      These tips are for people who want to get into software or electronics hardware with a bit more of an emphasis on consumer stuff rather than IT stuff. It also assumes that you are reasonably good at what you do. Word of mouth comes from making people proud to recommend you. It has taken me three years to get to my current position, and I did it as a sort of freelance contractor.

      Here are some hints:

      1:

      Join the local Audio Engineering Society chapter, or if nothing else, go to some of their meetings. They are happy to see new faces. I think the AES is a particularly good one to go to because they attract all sorts of people - musicians, people with home audio setups, hardcore analog design engineers, students, DJs, software engineers, etc.

      Talk to people. Be friendly, ask them what they are doing. Ask them about stuff that they are obviously interested in. If someone mentions that they need a person that can do such-and-such, and you know someone that is a good fit, offer to connect them and then do so. Don't recommend people you don't think are a good fit. Being someone who knows people who can help is a good long term thing to be. Eventually it will affect you directly because a person you have helped will probably recommend you for something.

      Don't push yourself, but be enthusiastic about the technical stuff you like doing. If someone needs you, they will tell you. You are not selling yourself, you are just being you. This is important.

      2:

      Be willing to do odd jobs that would otherwise be beneath you. I have done things like install SSH chroot environments to allow secure uploads. I charged $60/hour, and it only took a few hours. As a result, there are now five people that think of me first when they want something technical on unix done.

      3:

      Be willing to accept jobs that you know you can do, but that you know you haven't done before. Be honest about this to a potential client. It's a wonderful way to to learn new things, and keep food on the table. Keep track of your time, and estimate how much time it would have taken you if you were an expert. Only charge for that time. Your customers should get good value for money - they aren't subsidising your learning directly.

      This leads to an important corollary: If people know you accept things you have never done before and then do them well, you get a reputation as a person who can do anything. This is priceless, and is the main reason I am turning away juicy offers. People phone me when they are in a jam, and say things like "We know you don't do this sort of stuff normally, but we also know you finish things. Please help".

      4:

      Dont be afraid to say "no". Saying no, when done right, increases your value. These are the conditions: You have to say no for a good reason, like "I'm sorry, but I'm busy working on another project" or "I'm sorry, but I cant allocate that much time to a project, and I wouldn't be providing the kind of service that I think is a minimum requirement". If you need the work, take it, but realise that saying "no" isn't necessarily a bad thing, especially if you refer as per 5:.

      5:

      Don't be afraid to refer. After a while, you will know a lot of people that can do different things, and you would have worked with many of them. If someone offers you work and you can't take it, pass it on - refer someone you know will make them happy. People will learn that even if they aren't sure you can do something, you probably know someone

      --
      ---
    42. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by triso · · Score: 1
      Thanks. I leave in 2 months to try to ride a motorcycle round the world...
      That's great! What kind of cycle are you using? Which countries are you visiting? Have you set up a web site?

    43. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by invenustus · · Score: 1

      What kind of cycle are you using?

      The kind that can cross oceans, apparently.

      --
      grep -ri 'should work' /usr/src/linux | wc -l
    44. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      The sites not up yet but it'll be rtw.nokilli.com going to nokilli.com/rtw Should be up in a week, which I've said for 3 weeks now. I think my stories will be good. Weird stuff happens to me.

      I still need to do some more wrangling with movable type. Must... stay... off... slashdot.

      It's a 1962 Ducati 250cc. I fly to Australia to pick it up Oct. 12th. Then to New Zealand, then Japan to teach English. Hopefully over to Viet Nam, Laos, Thailand, Cambodia skip around Burma, and over to India then Pakistan. My only plans are Italy & Isle of Man in 2006 for vintage motorcycle races (Motogiro & the TT). Around Europe to Africa. I'd like through the Middle East, but I'll have to get there to find out what it'll be like. Talk to the local tourists & expats.

    45. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by invenustus · · Score: 1

      Terk mer jerb!

      --
      grep -ri 'should work' /usr/src/linux | wc -l
    46. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the euro is fiat currency too. It's just stupid bits of paper (or numbers in a computer), it's only a massive group delusion (on a par with religions in scale - think of euros and dollars as tiny bits of tradeable faith - or "credit") that give it any value.

      It's arguably one of the major reasons for the invasion and domination of Iraq by america was *because* the Iraqis started trading for oil in euros instead of dollars, though. Worship of Mammon, like most other religions, tends to cause megadeaths :-(.

    47. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the response - certainly some good advice there! For me personally, the freelance stuff would be difficult to do because of the problems getting good, affordable health insurance as someone not tied to an employer. My last job was found through networking (met the hiring manager at happy hour - never underestimate the power of beer!) and I agree that is the best way by far to find a position.

    48. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by boy_afraid · · Score: 0

      My wife is sick of me saying that. Just in case anyone is wondering, it's from a recent episode of South Park where future people are coming back in time to the present to get jobs for pennies on the dollar.

      It roughly translates to "Took my job", but he should have said:

      "They terk mer jerb!"

      HAHA! FUNNY!

    49. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That isn't how unemployment is counted, you have to be looking for work in order to be counted as unemployed.

      Actually I used to work @USDOL-HQ in DC for Office of Workforce Security. Very critical thing you left out that applies to many computer programmers/developers is that many times we are self-employed and work as independent contractors, therefore we are not counted as unemployed when we can not find work. Even if you were considered employed, after 6 months you are automaticaly no longer assumed to be looking for work so you are no longer counted.

    50. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by caswelmo · · Score: 1

      Speaking of clueless, when I said "parent" I was referring to the parent poster. But yes, I agree that "parents" work very, very hard. And they're doing a much more important job than some tech job.

    51. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by crmartin · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the seasonal adjustment includes about a net 90,000 jobs subtracted in July. (There's a similar adjustment in December.) The raw number is something like 120,000 new payroll jobs.

      Or check the households statistic: more people are actually employed now than ever before.

      There is an economic argument that the current 5.5 percent unemployment is about "full employment" over the long term.

      There's a lot of controversy about why the two statistics are diverging so wildly, but I can tell you anechdotally that a lot of places are putting giant "NOW HIRING" signs out, just like in 1999.

    52. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by CreatorOfSmallTruths · · Score: 1

      If you want a gmail account, please explain your email (or give another email) and I'll send you an invitation.

      I don't want to be the only basterd around :-)

    53. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by parliboy · · Score: 1

      Not necessary -- you've already been beaten to the invitation. Much thanks, though.

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    54. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      One with the world's largest snorkle.

    55. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by emc · · Score: 1

      Give me an invite, and I'll mod you up! :p

    56. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by CreatorOfSmallTruths · · Score: 1

      what is your email? I need your email to send an invite :)

    57. Re:Are jobs coming into vogue again? by emc · · Score: 1

      enrique(at)exocet(dot)org

  2. The only perks I get... by BladeMelbourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The only perks I get... are free soft drinks & training. Oooh, and a fast computer. I want a notebook damit!

    1. Re:The only perks I get... by Feyr · · Score: 1

      count yourself lucky. i don't get any of that (including the fast computer! stil using a p3 500 at work)

    2. Re:The only perks I get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Perhaps what we need is some honesty in the perks system. - ie:

      You are entitled to £10000 (or whatever) of perks per year. Choose from the following list:
      Company car: annual value £5000
      Free food: annual value £4000
      Notebook computer: annual value £300
      etc etc etc

      This still enables the companies to get their bulk discounts etc, making perks cheaper than extra salary. Further, it would mean employees get what they WANT from their perks, and feel happy about their employer being honest with them. (Yes, there are obvious holes here, but how is it as a basic premise?)

      Googlebomb: Jabba the Lawyer

    3. Re:The only perks I get... by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's how they do it where my wife works. Medical and Dental and the usual stock purchase and 401k programs are non-optional for everyone, but the rest is a-la-carte. She gets so many "points" to spend: Membership at a fitness center is x points, free legal services is y points, etc.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    4. Re:The only perks I get... by switcha · · Score: 1
      Free food: annual value £4000

      Shoot. You offer me free food, and that'll be just about in line with how many pounds I put on!

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    5. Re:The only perks I get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Free food: annual value £4000
      Great idea, but that seems a little steep.

      PS What's that Googlebomb for?

    6. Re:The only perks I get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We get free ice for the cooler, but we have to take time to go get it at the store, while our work piles up waiting for us to return. The free ice thing happened after two employees wound up in the hospital from heat-related illnesses.
      Let's see... (more perks) Hmmmmmmm....
      Don't have to work late, can sneak in an extra 10 minutes on the lunch hour, and the "boss" pretends not to notice. He's busy surfing the 'net on his free broadband, so really he don't care...
      Downside to the "boss's" broadband, only 8-bit color! Need extra good-looking porn stars to overcome that problem.
      Looking for more perks...
      (Found one) One salesman kept surfing one particular porn site for over a month, then I discovered that he had his IE home page hijacked by a "about:blank" virus, and couldn't go anywhere else! Then the trojan part of the think started soaking up all his bandwidth and processing power, leading up to a lock-up. Unplug! Reboot!
      After that, I suggested that he forget about the Internet at Work. (one perk gone)

    7. Re:The only perks I get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah. You're lucky to have a Pentium 3. Pentium 2s are the most common computer where I work.

      You have no clue how lucky you are.

      P.S. I happen to have a 1.7GHz P4. So, I'm complaining for everybody else's sake. I figure I owe them after taunting them so much. Muahahaha.

      P.P.S. And no I'm not management. I'm an intern. Haha! Suckers!

    8. Re:The only perks I get... by WillDraven · · Score: 3, Interesting
      All I get is a single regular size sandwich (as long as it dosent have roast beef on it, and no hot subs, oh and no #13s either, they have like 6 kinds of meat) and all the mountain dew I can drink. The closest thing to a computer I get to use at work is the cash register.

      Thats when the boss is thier anyway, when he's out we eat whatever the hell we want (#13 with triple meat and quadruple cheese) and bring in our laptops for some smoke-break deathmatching.

      I work at a Jersey Mikes sandwich shop.. oh the joy. No tech companies want to hire a 19 year old felon (bullshit drug charges, I was set up[yeah i know thats what they all say(seriously tho, it was entrapment[i wish i had that shit on tape])]), no matter how many programming languages I know or networks I've debugged, etc, etc...

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    9. Re:The only perks I get... by aggiefalcon01 · · Score: 1

      Hmm .. the only perks I get are ... lemme see ... air-conditioning (one word: Houston), water from a water fountain, high-speed internet (since I can't afford it at home) ...

      --
      Global warming is neither science, nor politics. It is a religion.
    10. Re:The only perks I get... by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      We get Starbucks in our office coffee machine. And I can plug my Thinkpad running Debian into the network and do a good bit of my work on that instead of the company-issue XP box.

      It's not a perk, but I became a squatter in an empty office and so far nobody's kicked me out :-) My initial pretext was that I needed to be in there to train some new staff who will be working in one of our field offices (that was actually true; I couldn't be effective in training if I was constantly walking back to my cubicle on the other side of the building). Then I got my phone moved because there was no phone in that office. The new members of my team are taking up their duties in the field next week, so they've now departed for home, but I'm still in the office, with all my books and my phone and everything.

      I won't get to keep it forever b/c my whole team is slated to move to another floor of the building and that will mean a return to cubicles for all of us, but in the meantime I have a nice view out of a big window, and when I need quiet to concentrate, I have a door that I can close.

      I don't actually care about having an office, but I do care about being able to see outside from my desk and I do care about having a quiet place to concentrate when I need it. If I had a cubicle with a window (yes, to the outside) I'd happily spend most of my time there, and if there were offices (even without windows (and preferably without Windows)) that I could go to and use when I really needed quiet, that would be fine.

    11. Re:The only perks I get... by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Meh the good jobs don't really come to those without degrees. I worked as a janitor this summer. Sure I'd rather be programming, but the end result is that I'm typing this on my Powerbook that I didn't have before. Money is money.

      Anyway, next semester I start my job in the computer center at my school. And to keep this on topic, there are perks... I get to help the cute girls get their email. *eyes glaze over*

      Okay I'm back now. Yeah. Just keep studying and you'll get a high-paying job that you like. Remember that you have to work, though. Jobs don't come just because you happen to have a degree...

      --
      My other car is first.
    12. Re:The only perks I get... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Well, I have a notebook, but no free software and no training whatsoever. In fact, our tuition reimbursement plan was eliminated because the company feels that they no longer need it as a benefit to attract new workers, since there are so many people desparate for a job. By the same token, they know that no one will quit no matter how poorly they are treated because there are no new jobs to go to. So far their theory has proven correct - not one person has left the company volunatily for over two years, in spite of no salary increases, no bonuses, moving to cheaper (and crummier) offices, and a reduction in benefits.

    13. Re:The only perks I get... by triso · · Score: 1
      count yourself lucky. i don't get any of that (including the fast computer! stil using a p3 500 at work)
      That's the company's loss if you have time to go for a coffee every compile cycle.
  3. Would want these employees? by waynegoode · · Score: 4, Informative

    Would you really want to hire employees who would be motivated by "free beer?"

    I can understand how it could be to a company's advantage to offer free perks, but I can think of dozens (okay, thousands) that would be better for the company than free beer but still motivate employees.

    1. Re:Would want these employees? by SnapShot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Different strokes for different folks. I can't think of a better perk than beer for two reasons.

      1. Its beer...
      2. If my employer is handing me a beer it means that the work day is complete and there is no expectation that I'm going to go back to work and do anything more productive than surf the web. Recognition that the day is complete is one of the best perks there is.

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    2. Re:Would want these employees? by neuro.slug · · Score: 1

      Yew shut yer trap orrrrrrrrrrr I'll come over there and do it for yeh! Oooh my head...

    3. Re:Would want these employees? by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      LOL @ #1 !

      I read the original Register article and thought the best thing was the laundry service, mainly because thats a chore that I *hate* and therefore something like that would improve my quality of life. If an employer offered to do my ironing as well, then I'd probably be an employee for life!!

      Although I do like the beer idea also, there's only *so much* of the stuff you can drink, and although drinks are work are fine, my work collegues aren't the people I want to hang out with all the time. And I'm not really a day-time drinker -- even if it is end of working day!

    4. Re:Would want these employees? by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

      It's not about attracting the best employees, it's about keeping the ones you have captive at work, so they'll be more productive. Would you rather have your workers go home at 5:00, or stay and eat free pizza while they continue to work? The ultimate goal is to have them never leave the office.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    5. Re:Would want these employees? by kfg · · Score: 1

      But, what if you work in the laundry room?

      KFG

    6. Re:Would want these employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I have it pretty good. I work for a small company that builds ruggedized computers and displays for military applications. My pay is not great, but we get medical/dental, free meals, and flexible hours. My boss hates being called a "boss" - he considers it a dirty word, and prefers everyone doing their own work. Of course there are priorities, so everyone just helps out the person who's in charge of that job (so in essense they tell you what needs to get done).

      When things aren't working and we need to have a late night or all-night session (which is great - because you can just take the following day off), the "boss" goes out and gets beer for everyone, and that keeps us going late!

    7. Re:Would want these employees? by hazem · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The ultimate goal is to have them never leave the office.

      Only to those unenlightened souls who believe that by spending more hours at the office you're getting more done. People simply aren't machines... they require more than just food, drink, and sleep.

      Sadly, too many people believe in the concept you've brought up.

    8. Re:Would want these employees? by FireAtWill · · Score: 2, Funny

      People simply aren't machines... they require more than just food, drink, and sleep. Ok, sex then. Food, drink, sex, then sleep. Yep, that's pretty much it.

    9. Re:Would want these employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sex? what is this "sex" thing?

    10. Re:Would want these employees? by FireAtWill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's not a bad team building thing to have some beer with the office-folk on Friday afternoons. I worked in one company where the executives opened up the bar in the boardroom on Friday evenings. Not for everyone though.

    11. Re:Would want these employees? by eht · · Score: 1

      How about offering religious services paid for by the company?

      I'd bet you'd object.

      Half the people at my office drink rarely or never, yet the company would be subsidizing the drinkers without giving any benefit to those who don't.

      Sorry, free beer is a pretty neat idea, but try to do something that benefits a larger percentage.

    12. Re:Would want these employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different strokes for different folks. I can't think of a better perk than beer for two reasons.

      1. Its beer...
      2. If my employer is handing me a beer it means that the work day is complete and there is no expectation that I'm going to go back to work and do anything more productive than surf the web. Recognition that the day is complete is one of the best perks there is.


      3. It's beer!

    13. Re:Would want these employees? by AtomicBomb · · Score: 1

      Work for a brewer then.... I had spent some time working in a beer brewery. They offered heavily subsidised meals as many workers need to work in shift. Free soft drinks, bread and butter. The canteen only charged for the meat. I typically spent less than a dollar a day.

      The even better part is the free beer after working hour. Just pop to the staff bar and help yourself. My coworker told me that it was a pretty standard practice to prevent staff from drinking alcohol illegally during working hour. As expected, you will look like an idiot if you cannot drink.

    14. Re:Would want these employees? by Nept · · Score: 1

      well, there is the free beer ...

      damn it we mixed the colors again.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    15. Re:Would want these employees? by Nept · · Score: 1

      Would you really want to hire employees who would be motivated by "free beer?"

      But isn't the question, Wouldn't you want to work somewhere that was giving free beer?

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    16. Re:Would want these employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the most intelligent guys I've ever met used to work for me and he would have been motivated by free beer - if it was good beer.

    17. Re:Would want these employees? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      damn it we mixed the colors again.

      Oh. That's a problem to be avoided, is it? Right, important safety tip.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    18. Re:Would want these employees? by jrockway · · Score: 1

      You can't please everyone, I guess. I personally would go for coffee, but then again I'm 19.

      BTW coffee, to me, seems like something that should be free EVERYWHERE, but it doesn't seem to be. Most people make it in their offices, I guess.

      My idea of a "perk" is a paycheck. The paycheck is what keeps me working. Free coffee would be a bit of a tease for my job (computer lab monitor), 'cause we're not allowed to drink in the computer labs :)

      --
      My other car is first.
    19. Re:Would want these employees? by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but who wants non-beer-drinkers working for one anyway? A man who can't enjoy a fine microbrew is a man who clearly has problems. Why might a man not drink?

      It could be against his religion--but then his religion is false (for as we know our Savior Himself made wine from water), and thus not to be trusted.

      It could be that he dislikes the taste--but then he is obviously tasteless, and thus not to be trusted.

      It could be that he does not trust himself to drink--but then he is obviously not to be trusted.

      The only legitimate reason not to drink is if one has willingly abstained from it as a kind of mortification or discipline--and one who has done that is no more likely to complain about everyone else getting beer than I am to complain when it'd a Friday, Wednesday, Lenten day or Advent day and the free meals all have meat.

    20. Re:Would want these employees? by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think big employers should start looking at enforcing their employees go home at a reasonable hour, and quite possibly kick them out of the office for an hour at lunchtime.

      The longer you sit at your desk the less productive you become. Given the current panic over the obesity epidemic, employers should be thinking ahead at how their corporate culture has contributed to their employees health. The current trends in population weight gain has less to do with the number of calories we are consuming, and far more to do with the number of calories we are not buring because of our sedentary jobs.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  4. You Insensitive Clods! by darth_MALL · · Score: 4, Funny

    My only job perk is Vogue!

    1. Re:You Insensitive Clods! by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speaking of "coming into Vogue again"...

      Pervert.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  5. Or maybe... by snipersock · · Score: 1

    My company isn't that bad to work for... except for the traffic and distance. I think smaller companies are always best, you have better teamwork and the management seems to have a better grasp of whats going on.

    1. Re:Or maybe... by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      screw that, I perfer a big company that doesn't panic every time there is a stock blip.

      Of course, the last company I was with made no sales for 2 quarters. their solution? fire the half the develepors, and treat the sales staff to two weeks in Jamaica.

      Morons.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Or maybe... by secolactico · · Score: 1

      Of course, the last company I was with made no sales for 2 quarters. their solution? fire the half the develepors, and treat the sales staff to two weeks in Jamaica.

      Man, you have to look at it from a PHB perspective: the developers had 2 quarters to finish the product, so they are no longer needed. Let's keep only a handful for housekeeping/last minute stuff.

      The sales staff, on the other hand, need to be motivated to sell the product the developers took 2 quarters to finish.

      See it all makes sense. Plus only by smoking Jamaica's finest you can come up with some of the ad campaigns I've seen around.

      --
      No sig
  6. stronger? by .@. · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Job market getting stronger? I think you'd better go back and check the monthly jobless claims against the (revised downwards, sometimes repeatedly) new jobs reports. The past four years may see a zero gain in jobs, possibly even a net loss in jobs in the US.

    People are still getting laid off. The example you cite is an exception; it's nowhere near the norm these days, nor will it be anytime in the near future.

    --
    .@.
    1. Re:stronger? by jbash · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Well, I don't know about others, bit I'm still unemployed since September 2003 ...

      After nearly 23 years with one organization .... to whom I was loyal and faithful ...

      My UI benefits were exhausted last month ...

      I now own a business: but it is a start up, and we are frantically trying to reach the breakeven point; we arent there yet .... we wont be there for a few months, and even then: we wont be able to pull a salary there for a few months after that ...

      Im down to my last $150 in my bank account ...

      My rent is due in 24 days ... and I dont have it ...

      I have three kids: the oldest could not start college, because we cannot afford her modest tuition ...

      We are starting to buy basic staples: rice and bean, pasta and flour ... in anticipation of running out of other 'easier' foods ...

      My credit cards are saving my life, for the moment, but they will require another payment in 28 days ...

      The job search, which should have already ended with a good job, has stalled, and gone stale: I have four outstanding cover letter/resume packages with prospects for decent work, but they are sitting on them, while I start to sweat it ... badly ....

      I have sent each of those four a kindly email to find out my current status, and all four say I am in the running .... but: the clock is ticking ....

      I have been thinking about looking up the local food bank ... my thoughts are now floating towards memories of obtaining food stamps, and the shame I felt being in that office, and answering those questions ...

      All the while: knowing I have vast technical experience that surpasses nearly anyone else in the local job market, and should have been hired weeks ago .... I think my experience scares prospective employers ... I have been paring it down to the bare bones to try to be more attractive to employers: so far: no dice ....

      So as I ponder my near term future: as I fret over how I will feed and house my children and wife, as I wait by the phone, wondering if those whom still consider me a 'viable candidate' for open jobs will actually call, wondering if I should at least find a menial job of ANY kind in the interim: fry cook, janitor, laborer, gas jockey, ANYTHING .... I am resisting making further contect with my 'prospective' future employers, so I dont reveal my ever growing desperation .....

      Im going to dig in the phone book: and see if I can find a backdoor into my chosen field ... otherwise: all Im doing is spinning my wheels, waiting for a call that may never come ...

      Sighs: dont you wonder how much better this GOP economy can get ? ...

      Do you wonder how many jobs 2.4 TRILLION dollars in tax cuts will buy the nation ? ....

      Is it trickling down yet ??? ...

      Someone tell me if it does: I would hate to miss it ....

    2. Re:stronger? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was out 26 months (October 2001-December 2003). Hang in there. You'll find the questions for assistance are MUCH harder now than they were even 10 years ago- food stamps basically aren't available if you have 2 people getting UI checks within the last 6 months, and welfare is basically non-existant. We lost about half of our asset value before I finally got a job. And I was putting out 100 resumes every single month (basically did nothing else other than send out resumes).

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:stronger? by Beowulf_Boy · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, but having no money is a fucking dumb exscuse for not starting college.

      I'm a sophmore at a uni in Ohio, and I have yet to pay a dime out of pocket. All I've done is signed some loan paperwork, and I'll pay it back when I graduate.

      College is no longer only for those with money, and I'm sick of hearing that exscuse. It just means you were to lazy to do any research.

    4. Re:stronger? by mtrupe · · Score: 0, Troll

      Maybe you should check the news. The unemployment rate has been dropping for some time now. Employers are hiring again (to be expected), and many are realizing that outsourcing didn't save any money (in many cases, it cost even more to outsource).

      I don't know--- I have had 3 job offers in the past month, two of which came this week, and all of which offer salaries similar to those of the late 99-2000. The job market is coming back. Despite what all the doom and gloomers like to say, these things do go up and down. We're coming out of a down cycle.

      By the way- I went to my current employer and told them about my offer. They are countering. Oh yes, the job market is back (I am a software engineer).

    5. Re:stronger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the government should have given you a handout instead of giving the rest of the country a tax break...

      What I want to know is, why after 20 years on the job were your finances so delicate that a year on 70% salary (unemployment) has bankrupted you. Sounds like you planned poorly and are mad that those meany republicans won't give you a handout.

    6. Re:stronger? by Neil+Blender · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Starting Score: 1
      Moderation: -2
      50% Whiney
      50% Troll

      Total Score: -1

    7. Re:stronger? by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was out of work for 6 months, and finally ended up taking a job paying 50% less than what I was making before. Me and my wife and two children maxed out my credit cards, were forced to move out of our (rental) house, and lived in one room of my sister's trailer for 2 months, and one room of my father's apartment for 2 months.

      When I got the job, I had to leave my wife and kids every week for 3 weeks and drive 6 hours each way to the new job, and only see them on the weekends. I eventually was able to get an apartment, and have been in the same job for 2 years. My debt load continues to increase and my credit rating is about as low as it can get because I have not had the funds available to pay off my existing debt. However, I am able to buy food and keep up with the car payments (the one thing I was able to keep through all this, and believe me it hasn't been easy).

      Now, I'm going back to college. I work full time during the day and take classes early in the morning and late at night. It is difficult, but I'm doing it. As a previous poster noted, you can get by on loans and grants quite easily. Currently my loans and grants pay my tuition, books, plus around 3 grand extra per semester, which I use to make car repairs, buy the kids clothes, and pay off the loudest debt collectors as I can.

      My point is, things can always get worse, but you can also always adjust your standard of living to get through the lean times. You mentioned you started a new business, and I have to question the wisdom of that when you are having trouble with basic necessities. Starting a business is a huge risk, and taking that kind of risk when you are so close to financial ruin already is not the smartest thing to do.

      As for food stamps, yes it is humiliating, but keep in mind that these things are designed to help people like you who are normally able to support themselves, but have fallen on hard times. You have spent 23 years paying into the welfare system, you should not hesitate to take what you need back out of it when you are having a tough time.

      If these four prospects are taking their time, go after more jobs. Sometimes, when you get desperate, you have to simply accept the first offer you get just to make ends meet. Also, if a fry cook job will put you in a better situation than you are now (and it looks like it will), then get one. Neither you or anyone else is "too good" for that kind of job. It's honest work, and it pays the bills. Do what you have to do to support your family, including swallowing your pride.

    8. Re:stronger? by bluGill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is your daughter really that submissive that when you tell her not to go to college she really wouldn't? I hope she finds a nice guy to support her, cause her only chance for a good life is that the guy who takes her is nice. (as opposed to a jerk who will beat her, and it seems most of the guys who want a submissive wife want to beat her)

      I paid my own college by working at McDonalds on weekends. I graduated with no Debt! Didn't cost my parents much either (dad paid my car insurance which was a nice benefit, but that is all) I could have paid for everything from loans if I wanted to, but I hate debt so I made the choice to not graduate with any. Your daughter could too if she put her mind to it.

    9. Re:stronger? by eln · · Score: 1

      Unemployment has a cap on how much it will pay. If you're coming from an $8 per hour job, it'll pay you 70%, but it maxes out quickly. In my cause, my unemployment paid me roughly 12% of my pre-unemployment salary. That's quite a significant dip.

    10. Re:stronger? by Skazamboi · · Score: 0

      You're obviously the exception, not the rule.

      New jobs simply can't keep up with people just entering the work force, so consider yourself lucky that you have it so well off.

      And btw, havent you posted the exact same post already under this article?

    11. Re:stronger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hooray! I'm getting paid the same as I was 5 years ago!

      GO BUSH!

    12. Re:stronger? by evslin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some income is definitely better than no income, even if it's a shit job like at a gas station. I've been through that (albeit only for a few months), my credit cards are maxed, payments are starting to be missed, and I'd be in deeper shit than I am now if not for the fact that I went to a staffing agency and picked up temporary jobs at factories/etc to at least keep some money rolling in for the time being. The job market sucks but there's always a need for somebody with a pulse lower down the food chain.

      And your daughter should have been able to file for some kind of financial aid. Institutional funds, student loans, grants, anything.

    13. Re:stronger? by whirred · · Score: 1

      So why are you making car payments if you're in such dire straits? Wouldn't it make more sense to get an old Honda for 1500 or so and leave it at that?

    14. Re:stronger? by dustinbarbour · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Dude.. nice sob story. However, in a capitalist society, it's sink or swim. Whatever the reason you were laid off, it's obvious that you were expendable (not to discount your abilities ro anything). Your company decided that they would be better served by cutting you out completely or outsourcing your position. Whatever the reason, you failed to make yourself indispensible. Plain and simple..

      That, my friends, is what it takes to make it these days. Be indispensible. I feel for ya', man, but when someone loses their job, it's their own fault. Even if some government action convinced your company to cut your position, it's still your fault. I'm sorry to be blunt, but it's the truth.

      In other news, I still have a job in the computing nidustry and, at the moment, I'm pretty secure. But I acknowledge the fact that I could lose it. So I continue to make myself indispensible.

    15. Re:stronger? by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      " I think my experience scares prospective employers ... I have been paring it down to the bare bones to try to be more attractive to employers: so far: no dice ...."

      It could certainly be so. I've had more than one recruiter tell me that even though I would be great for the job, that the company couldn't afford me, without every asking what kind of compensation I'm looking for. They just see a resume with a lot of skills and assume that I won't accept any salary that isn't sky-high, and go back to searching for someone who's resume looks less pricey. I eventually found that the best way to deal with this is to post multiple "targeted" versions of my resume on each of the major job sites, one for government, one for the private sector, and one for non-profits, each emphasizing different qualifications.

    16. Re:stronger? by swissmonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      I paid my own college by working at McDonalds on weekends. I graduated with no Debt! Didn't cost my parents much either (dad paid my car insurance which was a nice benefit, but that is all) I could have paid for everything from loans if I wanted to, but I hate debt so I made the choice to not graduate with any. Your daughter could too if she put her mind

      Well, I did the same, except that :
      1) My dad was unemployed during most of my studies
      2) I didn't have to work much during my studies
      3) I actually got money left at the end

      How did I do it ? Very simple...

      I grew up in a country(Switzerland) where the education system is not targeted towards the rich(can afford to pay) , the athletes(get scholarship to play golf, lucky ones !) and the geniuses(get scholarship also). It's a country where every kid has a chance, no matter how rich his parents are.

      And maybe the screwed up education system in this country could take a lesson out of that, so that we end up with less teenagers in the streets, homeless or joining gangs.
      I can't believe how many of my friends here in Seattle are still paying the loans they got for their studies, they've been out of school for more than 5 years and have a decent job, but it's not sufficient !

    17. Re:stronger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The market right now is certainly not what it was years ago, but its better than many think.

      I read slashdot and constantly hear the job search horror stories in threads like this one, so when my entire department was layed off back in March I thought I was in for a huge problem. With only two years professional experience, I figured I'd never be able to compete in such a depressed job market with the much more experienced.

      As it went, I had two offers within a month and of the fifteen people who lost their jobs, no one is still out of a job. Most of them had interviews set up within days of the layoff announcement, and job offers shortly after.

    18. Re:stronger? by Remik · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That's it...blame your problems on Bush...that'll make you feel better.

      You're not only an idiot, but you're pompous as hell if you think anything the President of the United States has done resulted in you losing your job or failing to find a new one.

      -R

    19. Re:stronger? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You've been working for at least 23 years, are unemployeed for the past year and are just now running out of UI.

      I honestly can't see how that could be the make-or-break decision for your child going to college or not.

      Was this year going to be the "save up my entire salary so my child can get a post-secondary education"?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    20. Re:stronger? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      You mentioned you started a new business, and I have to question the wisdom of that when you are having trouble with basic necessities. Starting a business is a huge risk, and taking that kind of risk when you are so close to financial ruin already is not the smartest thing to do.

      Damned if you do, damned if you don't. I wonder if anyone who EVER told someone on /. "can't find work? just start your own company!" will reply to this.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    21. Re:stronger? by shrewmy · · Score: 0

      Who's fault is it that it took you a year and you couldn't find a job? I lost my job last May. I swallowed my pride, lived with my parents, and spent up my savings taking a couple months off. At the end of July things were getting tight, and I realized it's going to take a while to find a new job to go to. So I applied at (oh the horror) a DINER and started last August. It was $11/hour less than what I was making at my old job, but it kept money in my pocket AND the bank, and I haven't hit any financial hardships. I'm still there and got a dollar and some change in raises, and I'm about to move back out on my own. The owner knows very well that when I find a new job I'm leaving, and as long as I keep showing up and doing my job and give him some notice, he's fine with that. I hate Bush as much as you but c'mon, it's not his fault. You're just making whiney excuses as to why you're too proud to work a "shitty" job.

    22. Re:stronger? by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should move up. I am getting paid about 50% more than I was 5 years ago. Its not george Bush's fault that you have chosen not to work hard and move up!

    23. Re:stronger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't hate to say this, but owning a business makes you employed.

      Not having ends meet, that's another matter; you've overstretched. Not having a successful business is another matter (something like 9 out of 10 businesses fail, and of the 1 of 10 that don't, most don't make much money at the start).

      I'm not sure where you get your sense of entitlement of that 2.4 trillion. What's 2.4 trillion going to do for you if it goes to the government? You expecting the government to prop up your industry or something? Were you in aerospace?

      Don't be mad at the tax cut. It was due, and yes, even for the ultrarich (how interesting that was redefined this election year from $130,000+ to $10 million+). You should be more pissed about the over-regulation by the government, particularly in intellectual property areas (patents, copyrights, etc.).

      The economic boom of the mid to late 1990s was more due to markets being forced open (home remedy, internet, tech) and unregulated. Neither presidential candidate is recognizing and addressing this. Where are the new products and markets? Their regulated into oblivion or patented to hell and undeveloped.

      This has squat to do with the tax cut. Under Clinton (and I'm a Republican), he spent less on defense, less on welfare, which in turn helped balance the budget as well. Less government in many ways. The problems now have to do with the current adminstration in other areas. An apologist will state it's due to 9/11, the war in Afghanistan and Iraq, security revamping (and buggling). Others will know better.

    24. Re:stronger? by op00to · · Score: 1

      Because the big kettle drum of CONSUME! CONSUME! CONSUME! is impossible to get out of most people's heads. You are what you drive in America.

    25. Re:stronger? by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      The unemployment rate has been dropping for some time now.

      The "unemployment rate" is a meaningless statistic, because it fails to account for how many people have A) taken worse jobs than the ones they had before, B) given up trying to find a job, or C) exhausted their benefits.

      And your anecdotal example is a meaingless "statistic" as well.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    26. Re:stronger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush is going to lose . Enjoy his reign of terror while you can. We are going to take back America from you ruthless greedy scumbags.

    27. Re:stronger? by LMariachi · · Score: 1
      I paid my own college by working at McDonalds on weekends.

      Uphill both ways, right? You must have gone to college a loong time ago, or possibly in some more civilized country than the U.S.

      Let's see how realistic that approach would be today:

      Assuming she works double shifts every weekend of the year, that's $5.15 * 32 hrs * 52 weeks = $8569.60 annual income. (The cost of her stunted social development is difficult to quantify, so we'll elide that.) According to the College Board, the average cost of tuition, fees, room, and board for the 2003-4 school year at a public institution exceeded that income by $2066.40. (Private schools' costs averaged over three times that income.) Bear in mind that tuition, fees, room, board hardly comprise the entirety of even the thriftiest student's expenses.

      The cost of higher education in this country is not a problem that can be solved with plainspoken patronizing platitudes prefaced with "Why, back in my day..." No one should have to live like an indigent in order to afford college.

      P.S. Student loans are just about the best credit deal most people will ever be offered in their lives.

    28. Re:stronger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should have been hired WEEKS ago?

      Sorry if I got this wrong, but it sounds like you sat on your ass for at least 6 months and then took your sweet old time looking for a job...

      Four cover letter / resume packages? Try 400 and then send out ANOTHER 400. Four... Please...

      It's like I told my old man when he got laid-off, stop crying about it and get a job. He's a mechanical engineer with extensive machine shop experience.

      You know what he's doing right now? Assembling respirators. Of course this isn't what he wants as his life's work but three things are a direct result of this:

      1) He doesn't have to sweat not having any money
      2) He can look for a job while he already has one, which is a SIGNIFICANT advantage
      3) For the first time in his life he has a job that he works 40 hours a week at with no worries when he's home

      Of course I'm sure that if John Kerry is elected he will sprinkle magic fairy dust that makes other countries want to grow a spine and employers roll back all the productivity efficiency gains they have made in the last 5 years.

      OK you busted me I am a registered republican...

    29. Re:stronger? by lythotype · · Score: 1

      Just a question, but

      After nearly 23 years with one organization

      You've worked for 23 years for one company. Then you become unemployed in Sep-2003. That is about 11 months unemployment.

      Now, let us assume that you worked 50 weeks out of a year, that is 1150 weeks (50 * 23) total employment. That's 46,000 hours of labor (given a 40 hours per week: 1150*40)

      Now, if you had been put money in an emergency fund, say $55 a week. That comes to a total of $63,250.00. (55*1150)

      A family could live off of $63,250.00 for a year, which equals about $1216.35 a week (63250/52). Even if you found, somehow, that $1216.35 per week was not enough to cover your monthly bills, why didn't you immediately take another job, ANY job (which of course would supplement your emergency fund)?

      What was your emergency financial plan over the course of your 23 years employment? Does not the financial security of your family (and property) take priority over finding (and waiting for) the "perfect" job? I'm not trying to be mean, but am genuinely curious.

    30. Re:stronger? by whatthef*ck · · Score: 1

      Dude, good luck to you. I hope you can make a go of it with your new business, or at least find another decent job.

      A word of advice, though: Don't focus on trivial things like who's in the White House now, or who will be next year, because in the long run, that has little bearing on your success or failure.

      BTW, what kind of technical skills do you have?

    31. Re:stronger? by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      Just out of curiosity, when aren't people getting laid off?

      People are ALWAYS getting laid off. Market competition works that way.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    32. Re:stronger? by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      I was kind of wondering about that also. Just being employeed for 4 years at a decent job is a dream to me. My current job is good, and I'm saving as much as I can to reach a goal of self-sufficency.

      At the very least, I'd sit the kids down and go "You all are going to quit school and get jobs or we're loosing our home"

      If they're out of the home I'd pull the family together and see what could be done. For pete's sake, it's FAMILY. If you can't count on each other to help each other out, what's the point?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    33. Re:stronger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (The cost of her stunted social development is difficult to quantify, so we'll elide that.)

      I'll attest to that, I worked 2 part time jobs through 6 years of college, and haven't had a date since my senior year of high school!

    34. Re:stronger? by eln · · Score: 1

      It's not like I was driving a freakin' Lexus. I had (and still have) a fairly decent reliable car, and given the fact that I ended up having to travel all over the place to stay with those family members (one was in New Mexico, one was in Utah), having a reliable car was extremely important.

    35. Re:stronger? by bluGill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We can argue pluses an minuses all day...

      Personally I think everyone would be better off if financial aid was illegal, including aid from parents. When kids have to work to put themselves through school maybe they will appreciate it... If nothing else this would bring competition into schools. Is a MIT education really 10 times better than a public university? (YMMV, MIT is very good)

    36. Re:stronger? by bluGill · · Score: 1

      5 years, which is standard, at least for the university I went to. Graduated in 98, so it wasn't that long ago.

      I wasn't making $5/hr at the time though, see they start you are minimum wage, but they give raises once in a while. I knew I needed more money than that, so I went for the management position, which was worth more money yet. I was making more than $6/hr when I quit (and I'm glad to be gone, though I miss some of the fringe benefits like working with girls) they offered me $8/hr then, but a job with computers beats it.

      Truthfully, if I had decided to stay with McDonalds as my career, there would never have been a year where I made less money that what I've made since. Store managers make pretty good money, and they made it clear the only reason they didn't offer me that position was they knew I wouldn't take it.

      No arguments about what it does to your socal life, I had no time for anything other than school and work. I never said otherwise. I think it was worth it.

      Student loans are only a good deal when you do not factor in all the tuition increases they throw at you because you don't pay the cost now.

    37. Re:stronger? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >This person may have taken a similar plan (pay down morgage , use income to send kid to school).

      Paying down the mortgage and sending kids to school is not a 1 year sacrifice, its multiple years.

      Your parents planned to send you to school many years ago, but if they lost their job 11 months before you leaving to school do you think they would want you not to go?

      This is what I honestly don't understand, is it because of the 11 months of unemployement or poor planning?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    38. Re:stronger? by superyooser · · Score: 1
      Man, that's tough. I'm in a tight situation myself, but I have only myself to support. My best money-saving tip is to buy groceries at a Super Wal-Mart. I used to shop at Bi-Lo, but Wal-Mart's product prices are usually lower than Bi-Lo's even with the Bi-Lo "bonus card" discounts. When I shop, I look straight for the little red cents/ounce stickers. And buy large quantities; you get more food for your money.

      On a side note, jbash, I think you could've precluded some of the harsh replies you're getting if you hadn't included that little anti-GOP diatribe at the end. There were people in your situation during the administrations of Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, and Jimmy Carter, and there will be people in your situation during the next administration, whoseever it is. If you want a Nanny State to guarantee you a job, you can vote Communist, but this is not yet Soviet Russia.

    39. Re:stronger? by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      Huh? They don't increase tuition retroactively for loan recipients. Anyway, I just meant that compared to other forms of debt (credit cards, bank loans, etc.) student loans are among the least onerous. Home equity loans can be okay, but most people aren't in a position to get those until a few decades later.

    40. Re:stronger? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      You have kids, don't you have a wife? My plan (once I graduate and pick a wife) is to make sure we live on the lower of our 2 salaries (which means I will want a wife who makes a livable ammount of money). The other person's salary will go 100% into investments. The plan, of course, is that after 10 or so years, our passive income (returns from investments) will excede our essential expenses (rent, food). Then we wouldn't even have to work! And if one of us loses a job even before we have enough investments to live off of, we don't have to lower our standard of living, because we are living on the lower of our 2 incomes anyway.

      So why doesn't your wife work? Or are you just trying to sustain a very high standard of living? I'm thinking if I can live off of my (as of right now, still imaginary) wife's $40,000 per year, with 10 years of me putting $55,000 into investments, neither of us will have to work... Does that seem reasonable?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    41. Re:stronger? by physicsphairy · · Score: 1

      Sighs: dont you wonder how much better this GOP economy can get ? ...

      Do you wonder how many jobs 2.4 TRILLION dollars in tax cuts will buy the nation ?

      Not as much as 20 trillion dollars in tax cuts, of course. Yay for tax cuts == more jobs! (Or are you a fan of the "have the goverment hire people to dig holes and fill them" methodology?)

      Seriously, though, after 1. the bubble burst 2. 911 3. Enron 4. WorldCom do you realize how friggin' amazing it is that we still have an economy? National and regional economies have been obliterated by stuff a lot less consequentional than that.

      Of course, that doesn't fall in line with Slashdot "Bush Bad!" mantra, so let's not expect any +5 insightful "GOP economy pretty darn good given all that's happened" posts. Yay censorship!

      P.S. What the friggin' heck are you doing trying to start a business when you are in a financial predicament? Sounds like you gambled and lost. Don't go crying foul at the present administration because the cards didn't fall the way you had hoped.

      I wish you the best of luck in getting back on your feet, but, really, you gotta have the foresight to wait until you are financially secure before dumping a crapload of cash into something like starting a business. Don't blame other people for your problems.

    42. Re:stronger? by swissmonkey · · Score: 1

      That would be a really bad move.

      What about students in poor neighbourhoods ? Where would they find jobs to pay for their studies ?
      They would have to move ? Then they'd have to pay more than other students(rent, trips to go see their families from time to time,...), they wouldn't have a fair chance.
      What about black students in southern states where it is known that they have a harder time finding a job than white students ? ...

      No, the solution is that the government must ensure that all children have the means to study.

    43. Re:stronger? by pod · · Score: 1

      In most of US, not having a car means your job prospects become severely limited, just at the time when you can't afford to be picky.

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    44. Re:stronger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My plan (once I graduate and pick a wife)

      Oh yeah, pick a wife. WTF are you on? Are you even in your teens yet?

    45. Re:stronger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Re:stronger? (Score:0, Flamebait)

      Flamebait? Really? How about delusional? Or inept? Or "sounds like a twenty-something who needs to get a little more life experience under the belt"?

      Hmm. Maybe flamebait is the only option.

    46. Re:stronger? by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 1

      It is interesting to watch the replies to jbash's post. You can almost tell how old people are by their responses (almost -- I suspect that some people who appear to be very immature are not young, but just, well... immature).

      It seems to be something like this: people in their 20s & still at their first or second job are giving all kinds of job tips like "dude, just be l33t and you'll never lose a job!" While people in their 30s do the math and wonder how the sob story could actually be true. And people in their 40s are saying "where is your SAVINGS?"

      Whatever. All I know is that when you get old, you get near-unhirable. Every hiring manager is younger than you are and some worry that you'll have their job. Some companies don't want to hire someone who will just retire in a few years. Some think you'll cost too much or be completely bored with the tasks. When this time comes, and it'll catch nearly every self-righteous Slashdotter here, one of your best options and only options left is to start your own business. Maybe consulting, maybe a franchise.

      Seriously, when you're five years from a normal retirement, I dare any Slashdotter to quit the job and find a new one. It won't be easy for 99% of the population. So stop beating up on the guy for trying to start a business. It may have been a logical way to overcome some obstacles. Of course, you can say that it sounds like he didn't plan it out well. But if my boss laid me off tomorrow, I wouldn't exactly be starting up a business on ideal terms.

    47. Re:stronger? by Atomic+Frog · · Score: 1

      It is stronger, despite what the job numbers might say. At least for Engineers. I was "off" for 24 months. I promptly went back to school for yet another degree, but kept my eye on the job market the whole time. There was nothing.

      But the past 6 months, there have been a real up-tick. The headhunters are calling again, flying me in, offering close to what I was paid , before. Companies are advertising. Down in Silicon Valley, they are again taking out radio ads (proclaiming "olympic size swimming pools" believe it or not), banners at their front door, billboards by the highway...

      I finally accepted a job (not in my town of choice, but hey can't be picky now) that pays close to what I got before, depending on daily exchange rate.

      I don't have the burden of a family, so I immediately went into grad-student survival mode for 2 years (and 3 months severance) and lived off a meagre RA salary and my savings. I got lucky. After 2 years, I came out alive, new, great job, zero debts, and still have my 2 cars and my own place.

    48. Re:stronger? by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know about others, bit I'm still unemployed since September 2003 ...
      After nearly 23 years with one organization .... to whom I was loyal and faithful ...

      In retrospect, perhaps it wasn't too smart to stick with the same company for 23 years. Organizations don't have loyalty to you; why should you show excessive loyalty to them? Now you are at a disadvantage because your resume doesn't show enough breadth of experience.

      -a

    49. Re:stronger? by jrockway · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. I'm happy that I chose not to go to a place like MIT for two reasons:

      The first is obviously cost. For no money on my part (admittedly my parents paid into some plan called College Illinois that will cover your tuition for 4 years at any in-state public university, but I do have scholarships for things like textbooks). And it's the same damn education. The MIT people don't know some secret about Taylor series that the UIC people don't. The first three years of undergraduate are most definitely the same everywhere (well, at any decent research university anyway). Maybe the fourth year the MIT people will have something new and interesting for you to work on that the UIC people don't (although there's plenty here too), but maybe not. For undergraduate work, the extra $200000 a year isn't worth it :)

      And secondly, at MIT you probably don't mean jack shit to anyone. Everyone there is really bright; why should Professor Pringles help you with your research? If you're pretty smart, you'll stand out more at a place like UIC (not to say that I'm particularly smart or that there aren't a lot of smart people at UIC), and get a chance to excel.

      So in the end, you get at the very least the same education at UIC that you would at MIT, and perhaps get even more. For a LOT less money.

      Oh, and hell UIUC is one of the best engineering schools in the country, so if you're in state it's a REALLY good idea to look into it! (Unless you don't like living in the middle of a cornfield, like me...)

      --
      My other car is first.
    50. Re:stronger? by jrockway · · Score: 1

      I like your live at a lower standard and invest idea a lot, but I couldn't get around your choice of words.

      Pick a wife? Where do you get to _pick_? And what if you love someone that doesn't make a great income? Will you just dump her and go for some rich girl?

      That's really sad if that's your outlook on life. Good luck...

      And living off $40,000 isn't going to get you what you want, I'll bet.

      --
      My other car is first.
    51. Re:stronger? by Lours · · Score: 1

      Well, I did the same, except that :
      1) My dad was unemployed during most of my studies
      2) I didn't have to work much during my studies
      3) I actually got money left at the end
      How did I do it ? Very simple...
      I grew up in a country(Switzerland) where the education system is not targeted towards the rich(can afford to pay)


      The same is true of many european nations, and partially true in Japan (some japanese /.er might contradict me there, i'm not so sure of myself on that point).

      Education is a right and should be free. Provided you have the adequate level of knowledge to study, the state should pay.
      This is, at least, a principle that many european nations follow.

    52. Re:stronger? by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Thanks for one of the 3 or 4 intelligent posts so far. Numbers show a mighty direct loss - unemployment figures only indicate the lucky few still receiving unemployment "benefits." And you outlook for the future is exactly spot on! Jobs may be disappearing in America, but at least intelligence hasn't!

    53. Re:stronger? by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      I greatly appreciate your pluck - having been in that type of situation - not once - but now more than a few times in my lifetime. But the crucial question is: will a job be there for you at the end of the line??? With the growing number of jobs being offshored - and the growing number of ways the government/corporatocracy think up to bring in more replacement workers (NAFTA, CAFTA, Singapore Accords, etc.) the future looks bleak...

    54. Re:stronger? by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      As someone who was on the original development teams of the major components which make up the Internet, the Web, automated telephone systems, etc. (and the alpha test site for the PC) I find this type of resposne to be sophmoric at best! The cost for offshoring many jobs ends upf being anywhere from 2 to 4 times the cost of keeping the job in the USA! I've never seen corporate management (with but several exceptions) have the intellect to know to keep on the most intelligent and productive employees. There ain't no Fairy God Mother Department in Corporate America that recognizes indispensability, dude!!!!! GET REAL!

    55. Re:stronger? by LordLucless · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't be silly. Education isn't a right - you have the right to pursue an education if you want to, but the government is under no moral obligation to ensure all its citizens are educated.

      On the other hand, any government should realise the benefits of having a large segment of their population educated. Personally, I think the Australian way is pretty good. The government will give any Australian citizen a loan with no interest for their first degree (indexation applies, but not interest). If you pay a part of your fees each semester up front, you get a discount. When you start earning more than $15,000, then you have to start making repayments through your tax return. Everyone has the opportunity of getting an education, government doesn't spend too much money (it spends money on people who get a degree, but never earn over $15,000 a year, and for the subsidised discount when people pay up-front, but for the vast majority, it breaks even.) and young people are given incentives to keep themselves debt-free.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    56. Re:stronger? by Metzli · · Score: 1

      I'm curious. How did you come up with the conclusion that "[I]n southern states...it is known that [black students] have a harder time finding a job than white students?" I don't mean to start a flame war, but most of the people I hear make this statement are from Europe or the American Northeast and have never even visited the American South. I'm a Yankee, but I've lived in the South (Arkansas and Tennessee) for over 10 years and have known many whites, blacks, etc., both students and non-students. I don't see this trend and have not heard about it from friends, associates, teachers, students, etc. I also don't hear about this from people currently working or looking for jobs. There are some places where I know that it'd be true (certain cities, etc.), but I know as many (if not more) racists in the North than in the South. You can dismiss my comments and opinions as purely anecdotal, but I'd really like to know where your data originates.

      --
      "It's too bad stupidity isn't painful." - A. S. LaVey
    57. Re:stronger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for stating this. Every "right" that people claim they should have means that the government is authorized to take it from someone else and give it to you. Why should I be forced to give my time or money to help someone who doesn't feel the need to help themselves. I worked three jobs to pay for my education and for the first ten years after I graduated I worked at least one extra job. If you are unhappy with your current situation, do something about it.

    58. Re:stronger? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      is it because of the 11 months of unemployement or poor planning?

      Or because they busted the piggybank to survive?

      I don't know if you've got kids or not, but raising three of them is not cheap. I've read in the paper that economists expect people to spend an average of $160K on each child through college. These days, all it takes is one hospital visit in those 11 months to bankrupt someone without insurance.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    59. Re:stronger? by flyingyogi · · Score: 1

      Man, I feel for you. I was unemployed for *two* solid years due to the tripple-whammy of the tech bubble bursting, the overal economy going south and being involved with a startup and not an established company. Thank God I didn't have a family to support but I grew up in a household where my dad was chronically unemployed because he had a Ph.d in a dead field. Therefore, I can relate better than most about the hardship(s) you're probably going through. I didn't have 23 years of experience in my given field but I was accomplished in my own right and despite dozens of interviews, I couldn't get a damn job to save my life! Finally, through sheer persistance, I caught a break. After putting up with a lot of shit my first year of "re-employment", things are better for me now. I secured a relatively stable job. It doesn't pay what I'm accustomed to but I can live on it and hey, it's a job. For most people, loyalty has nothing to do with job security. Rather, it's how you play the political game and/or your value to the organization. In my case, I'm very valuable to my company right now, so they keep me around. Once I'm no longer considered valuable, they'll discard me like used copy paper. That's just the way it is. The days of Watson's IBM "job for life" culture are long gone, especially in tech.

    60. Re:stronger? by flyingyogi · · Score: 1
      I agree 100% with your statement that making yourself indispensible is one of the best ways to keep your job but disagree 100% that it's one's own fault for losing their job.

      It's one thing to lose your job for slacking off and quite another because some bean counter determined it would be cheaper to cut you loose and hire some college kid.

      I've learned that no one is secure unless you're at the top of the food chain. However, you can do things to embed yourself in your job like a tick, making it difficult or cost-prohibative to replace you (as I have).

      That being said, try showing some compassion rather than attacking this guy. Not everyone is able to handle/cope with the shock of losing their job after such a long time of loyal service. Being unemployed, be it for 6 weeks or 6 months is damn hard. It's not only financially difficult but the blow to one's esteem is incalcuable.

    61. Re:stronger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There indeed are communities where the average pay is substantially lower than in other parts of the country. This difference can be by a factor of 2 or more. Don't forget the old uncle sam, with his regressive taxes (rich pay less as a percentage of income) takes his bite (7.65% or 15.3%) of that whopping $5.65/hour. So let's suppose our public supported school + room & board + books is $12,000/year. At net $5.25/hr that's about 2280 hours - more than a year round full time job, assuming they can find it.


      By the way there ARE communities in the US where about the ONLY jobs youl'd find are minimum wage, rural communities in the midwest, for example. Regardless if you're 16 or 40.

      An amourous cow herd.

    62. Re:stronger? by Doomdark · · Score: 1
      It doesn't look you are trying too hard to understand his situation here. Maybe the choice was simpler: even if he had saved up much or most of costs, the fact is that losing his job meant that he not only would have had to pay for the education but to also support the rest of the family. That is, having a job you can maintain your own life with income, and use savings for your children; without any income, you HAVE to start eating your savings pretty soon. Plus, during unemployment, there's no guarantee it will only be 11 months; it'd be rather short-sighted to continue investing if you don't know if it takes 2, 3 or 5 years to get a job.

      In the end, there's also a chance that he would have let the youngest child start her/his studies, only to find out that after one year, he couldn't afford to pay for it any more. That wouldn't have been too optimal either.

      I personally think this and other examples show why so-called "socialistic" welfare systems of Europe are superior to US "winner takes it all" approach, with respect to health care and education; especially since there's actual fairness and equality. Values that used to be respected in USA originally, and up to 20th century, too, but that have fallen out of favour for past few decades.

      Subsidizing the health-care and education systems ensures benefits go to people that would otherwise suffer the most, the children; allow them a somewhat even playing field.

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    63. Re:stronger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After over 3 1/2 years Bush has presided over an economy that has a net LOSS of over 1 million jobs. Pretty damn bad if you ask me. After that period of time, it's pretty damn hard to blame it on policies of the previous administration.

      I'ld like to now whether or not the MEDIAN income has increased or decreased in that time. The average probably has gone up, but I'ld bet the MEDIAN has gone down.

    64. Re:stronger? by bluGill · · Score: 1

      No, but every year they do increase tuition. The amount you owe for last years education won't change (other than interest payments), but the amount you pay this years is more, by a lot more than inflation. A large part of that is they can because people just get a bigger loan, if people would drop out in numbers (doesn't have to be large, just enough to impact the bottom line) schools would be forced to reconsider how they spend money.

    65. Re:stronger? by corngrower · · Score: 1

      Quite true. The only way you get decent salary increases is to get yourself decent job offers from another company, an threaten to leave the current company (being actually prepared to do so) if they don't provide the salary you ask. You have to have them by the balls, so to speak, if you ever want to get ahead.

      The former V.P. of one company is probably regretting her decsision several years ago of not promoting me to architect. The architect she assigned to the project messed up and the project failed in a rather spectacular manner. The product performed miserably compared to competition, due to flawed architecture. At the time the architecutre was proposed, I had stated that it would perform poorly and the project would fail if that were the case, and proposed an alternate solution to avoid the problems. Suffice it to say, that company is today, a much, much smaller company, holding on by the threads.

    66. Re:stronger? by .@. · · Score: 1

      " Down in Silicon Valley, they are again taking out radio ads (proclaiming "olympic size swimming pools" believe it or not), banners at their front door, billboards by the highway..."

      Errr...I live in Silicon Valley. Santa Clara, to be precise. I drive up and down the peninsula every day. Those radio ads to which you refer don't exist. The banners, if you'll notice, are old and tattered and on either startups, or are advertising for hardware engineers (MEs, EEs). Not IT folks.

      The only billboards by the highway advertising jobs are the pseudocryptic handful of billboards for Google, who are notorious for advertising the same 30 positions every month for the past two years; Google, who currently faces several age discrimination suits; Google, who is in trouble with the FTC for not reporting several million issued options; Google, who has set their hiring standards so high it's impossible to land a job (Ph.D, preferably from Stanford, multiple published papers in the field for which you're being interviewed, personal association with current employees, etc.); Google, who has interviewed damned near every resident of Silicon Valley at least once (many people are now tracking their "Google number", the number of times they've interviewed with them).

      Be careful waving that, "Silicon Valley is on the up" flag about. Several of us live here, and it's not. I know people -- people whose name you'd recognize in the IT field due to the extremely popular software they've written, or due to the extremely popular O'Reilly books they've written -- who have trouble getting a job out here. I've seen independent consultants grasping for the security of salaried W-2 employment because the market's still dry. I've seen people -- good people -- lose their homes. I've seen people who are typically invited speakers and lecturers forced to move out of the area due to the lack of employment opportunities out here.

      Don't try to tell me the market in Silicon Valley is improving.

      (And no, this isn't sour grapes from an unemployed techie. I'm happily employed in a job many of you would give your eyeteeth for. )

      --
      .@.
    67. Re:stronger? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >without any income, you HAVE to start eating your savings pretty soon.

      I totally agree with this. But there is a point where its the short/medium term of working at a crap job/doing something humbling/applying for loans and your child's future.

      >only to find out that after one year, he couldn't afford to pay for it any more. That wouldn't have been too optimal either.

      There is no sure thing in life. Including the fact that she might get kicked out, hate her school and want out. She could have been in 2nd year and then he could lose his job. Someone one in the family could develop an expensive illness. Again, I don't see how not having a job for 11 months is a make-or-break deal. You could still end up wasting a years worth of money even if he didn't lose his job.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    68. Re:stronger? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >You can almost tell how old people are by their responses

      Thats pretty insightful. :)

      I would love to be in my 50s right now. I would have had;

      Schools that were safe. It was more affordable to get a post-secondary education. You grew up in a world without AIDS, so if you were into sex outside of marriage that was about as good as its been (until they find a cure/vaccination).

      Job security was pretty good as long as you were half smart. Well paying secure union jobs were aplenty. A 20 year mortagage in the city was reasonable proportional to your salary vs. today. You should have had some extra money to ride the biggest bull market ever (USA 1980-2000).

      >All I know is that when you get old, you get near-unhirable.

      I've been hearing this for the past 10 years, why should people in their 50s now be caught off guard?

      When I actually get in my 50s, it will be a different enviornment than what 50s are like today. Just like everyone one in their 20s/30s/40s have their own unique challanges that people in the 20s/30s/40s of previous generations never encountered.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    69. Re:stronger? by Remik · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ...this from someone who's too chickenshit to risk their karma.

      I have no doubt Bush will win. However, I think it'd be funny to see Kerry win and screw things up even worse...resulting in all the liberals having to eat their words (oh, right, they never do...it's always the Republicans fault somehow).

      The only people still fighting for Kerry are the Deaniacs. Everyone else knows Hillary in 2008 is your only hope.

      -R

    70. Re:stronger? by Remik · · Score: 1

      By the way...greed is good. It's what this country was founded and built on. If you need to campaign against something, start with unsubstantiated moralizing, please.

      -R

    71. Re:stronger? by Darby · · Score: 1

      I have no doubt Bush will win. However, I think it'd be funny to see Kerry win and screw things up even worse...resulting in all the liberals having to eat their words (oh, right, they never do...it's always the Republicans fault somehow).

      If this was a likely outcome, then why is it that for at least the last 50 years, the economy has *always* been better under Democratic presidents?
      The stock market does better.
      Job growth has always been better.
      The gap between the rich and the poor has shrunk due to everyone doing better. Contrast this to the situation under Republicans where the rich get richer at the expense of the poor and the middle class shrinks due to them becoming poorer.

      See the chart?

      The simple fact is that given this track record it is the fault of the Republicans that the Republicans' policies never work as well as the Democrats' policies. Were it a one off thing, it would be debatable, but it is absolutely consistent.

      Trickle Down/Voodoo/Supply side economics is an absolutely failed theory that only a few crank economists ever believed in in the first place. It just so happened that they tend to benefit the already rich at the expense of everybody else.

      Those are the facts.

      The only people fighting for Bush are freedom hating traitors. How would it be possible for anybody else to support him? His policies of deceit and fascism (Yes, fascism. Look it up, that is what he whole heartedly supports. Enron writing our energy policy? That is a canonical example of fascism at work.) are ruining our economy, our reputation and our country.

      So, no, we won't have to eat our words, because liberal policies are what created America, they are the basis of what this country stands for and they have consistently proven to be a good way to grow an economy.

    72. Re:stronger? by andy55 · · Score: 1

      So in the end, you get at the very least the same education at UIC that you would at MIT, and perhaps get even more. For a LOT less money.

      Just who are you trying to convince? It's actually pretty simple, IMHO...

      Ivy leage schools, at least in the science/math/engineering departments, use those whopper tuitions for top facilities, top research funding, and to attract top professors. The top professors, in turn, typically lead their field and are able to share their expertise, insight, and findings with their students, attracting the brightest and most motivated students. As a cycle, since the top students popular their classes, the professor and curriculums can move faster and in more depth than at other universities. So, although a Taylor series is a Taylor series, such fundamentals are omitted from class time. For example, in my first semester at Cornell, the intro E&M course I took starting using multi-dimensional analytical calculus by day two--there was no watering down of the material because students may not have even used it before. You were just expected to learn it all within a few days--and if you couldn't, you'd fail out.

      So, to return the the issue, the large tuition ends up being a means to concentrate top students. A university can't concentrate the top students if they don't have the top facilities, the top professors, and the top research (and those things take money!)

      Is it possible to get the same caliber education elsewhere? Sure, but it's going to take a truckload of independent and above-and-beyond study to do so (which is hard for *anyone* to become that self-motivated).

      Is large tuition necessary to concentrate top students? For the reasons above, yes--unless the government doesn't supply all that money (as the Swiss guy posted in a related thread).

    73. Re:stronger? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      I say pick because I am that rare combo of engineer + athletic + good looking. That puts me in the position to 'pick' while most of my other engineer friends 'beg'. Lucky me : )

      Oh, and $40,000 is pretty good if you have no kids, no debt, and live in the midwest. As far as loving someone who doesn't make good money, the solution to that is simple: don't date people who make no money, that way you aren't going to be falling in love with any of them.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    74. Re:stronger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I agree. High taxes, high cost of living, a mediocre lifestyle for everyone, and sticking it to the effecient, smart, productive members of society so that everyone can get a free education is totally worth it. Just look at the increase in the chocolate and watch numbers from your country.

      I guess that I should clarify the term mediocre lifestyle. Some things I like much better and are not mediocre such as going to work late or taking a long lunch break, or having local shops, and having decent pop, electronic music instead of this ungodly rap/hippity hop crap, and old architecture, and interesting clothing, and people being fit. What I don't like are the bloody boring houses and cars that you people drive. And also the fact that everyone makes the same amount of money no matter how good they are or what they do.

      We actually have the same sort of thing as to education in the US. The government pays for most of the cost of public universities and there are quite a few very good ones. So you can get into a very good public university with very little money. And the bastards are trying to get into health care. There goes the cure for cancer ...

      As for me I have a good job, a Mercedes, and I will pay for school myself. Every one of my friends (who weren't cursed with rich parents who wouldn't pay for their education like mine) are getting loads of financial aid. Worst case scenario you take out a loan at %3 or just work during the summer and part time during the semester. Not a big deal and joining a gang never seemed like a viable alternative. People join a gang because it is the culture that they find themselves in and they aren't independent enough to move somewhere else (not to say that moving would be an easy or probable thing for them just that it is possible).

      GDP
      1 United States $ 10,400,000,000,000
      33 Switzerland $ 231,000,000,000

      GDP per capita
      United States $ 37,600
      Switzerland $ 31,700

      Unemployment Rate
      Switzerland 1.90
      United States 5.80

      US 2
      Switzerland 1 =

      US wins!!!

      Just joking. Switzerland is a very beautiful country and the unemployment rate is very impressive not to mention the latest standard of living rating from the UN, I just wouldn't want to live there or Canada without a lot of money hidden away in some off shore account that the government and the poor, greedy, self-entitled, local peasantry couldn't get at.

      Ok so most of this was a flame but it helps to understand that the US is a very productive place, people are usually very self-reliant, and brilliance, hard work, and innovation are usually highly rewarded. So it sort of pisses me off when people start acting like we let poor people starve to death, that the country is crime ridden, health care is somehow unavailable, people can't get through college etc. Again I know from first experience that none of these things are perfect and even though I don't exactly relish having to work for my education I think that I would much rather do that than forego the opportunity to make lots of money and do my own thing. If any of those things were really bad wouldn't you have mass rioting etc? We just handle those problems in a more efficient but less thorough way than Europeans. Some of the best medical care, drugs, technology, business services, etc. comes from the US because good people get rewarded. Making a decent car still seems to elude us though ... Sorry for the people who are still out of work. It sounds really bad. My suggestion is move or try something else. Capitlism doesn't guarentee you a job in your chosen field otherwise we would still have a rather large horse and buggy trade. Funny though because in my part of the country CS grads from my school are still starting out at $60k+ and moveing on up.

    75. Re:stronger? by Lours · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. Education isn't a right - you have the right to pursue an education if you want to, but the government is under no moral obligation to ensure all its citizens are educated.

      Silly ? Any opinion is worth having if it's argumented, silliness only lies in voluntary ignorance.

      Regarding education not being a right, well, this is your opinion (modded +3 ? waoh... why didn't mine go that high ? it was at least informative) but most of the european nations don't share it and have made another principle govern access to college education.

      If I remember correctly, the goal of the state is to protect and serve the citizens. And it is the interest of every democraty to have citizens as highly educated as possible (see what the United States now have as a president because of restricting access to college education to a wealthy minority).
      The air we breathe is free, and I - with the majority of europeans - think the knowledge with which we build our citizen brains and spirits should be too.

      Regards.

    76. Re:stronger? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Silly ? Any opinion is worth having if it's argumented

      You're right in a sense - an opinions worth rests on its arguments. If its arguments are sensible, it's a sensible opinion; if its arguments are silly, it's a silly opinion. My response to your opinion was a reaction to seeing far too many people say "I have a right to XXXXXXXX" while having no conception as to what they were actually saying.

      Regarding education not being a right, well, this is your opinion

      No, its not. In a technical sense, "rights" are legal definitions. What rights you have are a matter of legality, not a matter of opinion.

      If you have a "right" to something, it cannot legally be denied you (with convicted criminals being a special case). Most of the rights granted citizens are things like those enumerated in the US Declaration of Independance - "life, libery and pursuit of happiness". These things might be thought of as being "natural" rights. That is, it takes some form of external force to abrogate those rights - they are a "default" state. In the case of education, it takes an active application of an oustide influence to educate someone.

      If a government was to declare that their citizens had a "right" to education, it would open a whole can of worms. Expelling or suspending someone from a school, for example, would be a violation of their right. It would mean that any sort of academic restrictions on who could take what course would be a violation of people's rights - it would probably result in hundreds of people without sufficient aptitude taking medical or legal courses. There would probably be insufficient instructors for those subjects, meaning an inferior education for that proportion of students who actually have a chance of graduating.

      If I remember correctly, the goal of the state is to protect and serve the citizens. And it is the interest of every democraty to have citizens as highly educated as possible

      Yes. But it's also in the interest of a democracy for every citizen to have a job - but declare employment a right and suddenly every unemployed person is having their rights violated. Just because it would be good to have something, doesn't mean that thing should be a right.

      (see what the United States now have as a president because of restricting access to college education to a wealthy minority).

      George Bush's actions have nothing to do with restriction of education; he had access to the best available. If you're talking about the people who voted him in, well, that's up to debate. I personally think it's more the case of the US electoral system (instant runoff and compulsory voting would improve things dramatically I think).

      The air we breathe is free, and I - with the majority of europeans - think the knowledge with which we build our citizen brains and spirits should be too.

      And yet European nations still have copyrights and patents - designed specifically to restrict knowldege. I have no problem with information being free - fine by me - but education implies a lot more than a pile of textbooks. It implies professors, examinations, laboratory equipment, etc. In fact, with the sort of stuff you can find online, I'd say it would be possible to educate yourself fairly well - at least on technical topics. But access to information isn't the same thing as an education.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    77. Re:stronger? by Lours · · Score: 1

      Regarding education not being a right, well, this is your opinion

      No, its not. In a technical sense, "rights" are legal definitions. What rights you have are a matter of legality, not a matter of opinion.


      True. And as such, most european nations have technically and legally made education a right.
      Education is also stated as a right in some of the UN fundation documents, I don't remember which one, but I'm quite sure it's explicitely written.

      Yes. But it's also in the interest of a democracy for every citizen to have a job - but declare employment a right and suddenly every unemployed person is having their rights violated. Just because it would be good to have something, doesn't mean that thing should be a right.

      Sure, but as it's each nation responsability to decide so, it doesn't mean neither that it should'nt be a right. It all depends on the political model that those nations citizens support.
      Compare Europe and the USA on privacy, this is a really weak right in the USA, a very strong one in Europe. Even in Europe, nations have very different priorities, in some Scandinavian countries, work is indeed a right and everyone gets a salary just by being a citizen (I don't remember which one though). They are not anyway near bankrupcy though.

      George Bush's actions have nothing to do with restriction of education; he had access to the best available.

      When listening to his speeches, this is far from being obvious, but it's not my point :)
      I was speaking about the voters' education. GWB was not elected because of his education, he was because of the lack of education of the population (most of the poors don't vote in the USA even though they would have a big influence if they supported a third candidate).

      And yet European nations still have copyrights and patents - designed specifically to restrict knowldege.

      This is a common misunderstanding of the patent system and of copyrights.
      Copyrights do not regulate knowledge in any way, they regulate copy, they do not forbid "inspirated" (inspired ?) work.
      Patents have been designed specifically to help the spread of knowledge by providing an incentive for inventors to innovate and an official means to register and publish *all technical details* of their inventions, thus making them public.
      (the fact that the patent system is currently being subverted is another topic)

    78. Re:stronger? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      I was speaking about the voters' education. GWB was not elected because of his education, he was because of the lack of education of the population (most of the poors don't vote in the USA even though they would have a big influence if they supported a third candidate)

      As I said before, I would argue the problem is with the way US elections run, rather than the education of the constituents.

      This is a common misunderstanding of the patent system and of copyrights. Copyrights do not regulate knowledge in any way, they regulate copy, they do not forbid "inspirated" (inspired ?) work.

      Copyrights do restrict knowledge. They prevent the propogation of material. If you want to know something, you have to buy the book (or get the information from someone who is willing to give their copyrighted material away for free). That means that knowledge is restricted to those who can pay the distributors. I'm not arguing wether copyright is right or wrong here, but it does in fact restrict knowledge.

      And, yes, I suppose you're right about patents. They don't restrict information, they just prevent people from being able to do anything with certain information until a certain term has expired.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    79. Re:stronger? by Remik · · Score: 1

      Liberalism is not what this country was founded on. Capitalism is the heart of the U.S. Liberalism is just socialism in drag, economic policies that even fewer and crankier (heh) economists have believed in, and which have proven to be one of mankind's most foolhardy social experiments.

      Don't try to spin your liberal rag of a paper's statisticless chart to me. I spent four years working for the institution that has produced and had on faculty more Nobel Prize winners in Economics than any other on the planet. In that time I learned that nearly all the great Economic minds come to one conclusion: The economic policies espoused by the American Liberal only produce a race to the bottom. And when need is accepted as the basis for economic claim, only the very foolish and the very noble bother to strive.

      -R

    80. Re:stronger? by Darby · · Score: 1

      Liberalism is not what this country was founded on.

      Certainly it is.
      "We hold these truths to be self evident : That all men are created equal"
      You can't get more Liberal that that.
      Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion, these are the definitive Liberal Policies.

      Don't try to spin your liberal rag of a paper's statisticless chart to me.

      Try the US department of labor, dipshit.

      I spent four years working for the institution that has produced and had on faculty more Nobel Prize winners in Economics than any other on the planet. In that time I learned that nearly all the great Economic minds come to one conclusion: The economic policies espoused by the American Liberal only produce a race to the bottom.

      Yeah, right.
      Sure you did, and sure they so concluded. What a load of crap.

      Your understanding of Liberal economic policy is deluded at best if you think what you said was even sane, let alone correct. Let me guess, you think if somebody falls on hard times for any reason whatsoever, they should be left to starve?
      If not, then you have a liberal belief. If so, then you are the one espousing a race to the bottom.

    81. Re:stronger? by Remik · · Score: 1

      The word liberal took a 180-degree spin in definition in this country less than 100 years ago, so the majority of your response is beside the point.

      Yes, I hold classical liberal ideals, like the fact that you should be able to believe whatever the hell you want. But, if you want to actually learn something, try reading Hayek's Road to Serfdom, and you'll see how no one in American pop-culture has used the word liberal to refer to the types of values found in the Declaration of Independence in at least the last 50 years. (Somewhat beside the point, the 50th anniversary edition of Hayek's masterpiece has an excellent forward by Nobel Laureate in Economics Milton Friedman...and my copy is signed by same, as his office used to be a few steps from my desk...but you've already concluded I'm one of those 'Right-wing wackos' whose every word is a lie.)

      In case you don't want to make a trip to your library, I'll enlighten you on the concept of a race to the bottom, since your final thought betrays a lack of understanding of the concept. When need translates to cliam, the neediest person is for that reason alone entitled to the most. The result is a fight to prove need. People waste their energy trying to show that they are the worst off, because the only thing you get for trying to succeed is having your work product taken and given to someone with less.

      American liberal economic policy is built on taking from those who have shown a propensity for success and giving to those who have shown a propensity for failure. As every other experiment with Socialism has shown, placing such bets is true folly.

      Well, that's going to be it for me on this attempt to reform a lost soul. And, here's the reason you won't believe. The case I've been working on non-stop for weeks finally settled, so I'm taking a well deserved vacation.

      -R

    82. Re:stronger? by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      You also live in a very small, very rich country, that allows almost no immigration.

      Of course it's easy to offer a free education to a tiny mono-ethnic group of people richer than 99.9% of the planet.

      If all the richest people in the United States formed their own little national enclave and kept it carefully isolated from everyone else, and refused to share with anyone but their select few, I am sure it would be quite easy for them to provide free education and healthcare to everyone. It is hardly what I consider a model of egalitarianism.

    83. Re:stronger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is spamming with resumes really effective? Last few jobs I got I spent about 3-to-30 days studying the company's business before my introduction-to-the-company followed by a interview (and only later did I do a resume). IMHO targeted job searches worked pretty well. At 3 resumes/day its hard to believe you'd really develop or exhibit any sort of strengths that are special to the guys you sent them to.

  7. How about the essentials? by ejaw5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about providing healthcare and retirement, seeing these two have been disappearing for quite some time now.

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
    1. Re:How about the essentials? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A 40 hour work week. Go home. Have a life. Come back refreshed and more productive.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    2. Re:How about the essentials? by bladernr · · Score: 1
      How about providing healthcare and retirement

      Healthcare should be solved, but retirement? Its a pretty new concept, introduced in a big way to shrink the workforce during the depression. Think retirement was the rage in the 1800's? Nope. Why is retirement a right? The thought of suddenly stopping my life is horrifying to me.

      Now, financial independance so I don't have to work, that's good. But do you know about life expectancy comparisons between retired and non-retired people of the same age and physical condition? The retired people die first.

      Seriously, me and a couple friends sit around marveling at the "retirement culture" we've developed. I used to believe in it, but, if you really start thinking about it, what sense does it make? Why is there a "magic age" when you stop working? What changes about you in a mere 24 hours (as you pass that age) that you suddently go from able bodied contributor, in one swoop, to not working at all?

      Retirement: you can keep it.

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
    3. Re:How about the essentials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about providing healthcare and retirement, seeing these two have been disappearing for quite some time now.

      No thanks. Emplpoyer-provided healthcare is probably the number one reason for the state of the US healthcare system. Just like the IRS takes payroll tax out of your paycheck before you even see it, thus keeping you from truely feeling the cost of income taxes in your gut, so too does employer-provided health insurance.

      Since people don't see the money flowing from their wallets to the big, inefficient, bureaucratic health care providers, they rarely have either a sense oif what healthcare really costs nor a responsibibility to be frugal with the spending, instead most people like they need to get as much out of the system as they possibly can, thus leading to spiralling medical costs, pushing affordable treatment out of reach of the common, un-insured man.

      Instead, we need a system that brings responsibility and accountability right back where it can do the most good - in the hands of the individual patients and doctors. Make health insurance groups or pools illegal. Change the current buffet-all-you-can-eat type system to something uses credits or something similar so that each patient can decide, with the conseling of their doctor and family, what course of treatment is most cost effective.

      If we did that, the cost of health care in the USA would plummet. But then so would the share prices of all the HMO's and other middlemen that only create paperwork and privacy risks.

    4. Re:How about the essentials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're going to work until you die?

      The point of retirement is so that after working hard for decades, you can take some time off and enjoy life a little bit before your die.

      If you don't want that, fine, but don't complain to us when you're a 75 year old depressed workin man who just wants a break...

    5. Re:How about the essentials? by Zerbey · · Score: 1

      Not so much decent healthcare, but affordable healthcare. Since my company switched providers I'm spending $400 a month on my families healthcare. Add to that a $1000 deductable and guess what? I've got the worlds most expensive prescription drug discount!

      I know the current climate for healthcare providers isn't good with all the frivilous lawsuits, but something has to give.

      I hope John Kerry lives up to his claims if he becomes president.

    6. Re:How about the essentials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If you don't want that, fine, but don't complain to us when you're a 75 year old depressed workin
      > man who just wants a break...

      Or a 75 year old with a body of wasted muscle who has 30 tons of steel to shift using a forklight and a crane

    7. Re:How about the essentials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why is there a "magic age" when you stop working? What changes about you in a mere 24 hours (as
      > you pass that age) that you suddently go from able bodied contributor, in one swoop, to not
      > working at all?

      For just the same reason that you can, in a mere 24 hours, go from having no wage protection at all, to having a mandatory and reasonable minimum wage.

      Or, for the same reason that you can go from extremely high vehicle insurance rates, to moderate vehicle insurance rates.

      (Short version: because they can. Long version: a discourse on statistics and how they apply to a group, but not individuals.)

    8. Re:How about the essentials? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I agree with your point that people that retire and do nothing, die fast, which is one reason I would avoid it. I like my work, and the wife and I save well over 50% of what we bring home, so we can retire before 50, to do what we love more, traveling and haggling (really). The goal is to get to a point financially where we just need to cover our current expenses, at which time we expect to buy a nicer RV, travel to auctions and antique shows to buy and sell stuff. All we need to do then is make more than our expenses, so our taxable income is small and most of our living expenses are business expenses. Make $80k gross profit, spent $65k in travel expenses, pay taxes on $5k profit, that kind of thing.

      This obviously has financial risk, which is why we are working to get financially independent first. Plus, we have owned businesses that buy and sell items, ebay, auctions, so we are not new to this. But this is how I see retirement, still working, but maybe 10-20 hours out of a 50 hour work week is stuff you *HAVE* to do, paperwork, etc.

      This type of accellerated savings and modest lifestyle also comes in handy for the unscheduled recession. We lost tens of thousands in one business after 9-11, but didn't have to change our lifestyle. We didn't lose the business or get into financial trouble, so a year later, we were in decent shape.

      Oh, as a final note: Our retirement plans assume $0 from Social Security, so anything we *DO* get will just be a bonus.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    9. Re:How about the essentials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about providing healthcare and retirement

      You mean like in Canada?

      seeing these two have been disappearing for quite some time now.

      Yep.

    10. Re:How about the essentials? by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      There's no reason that employers should be held responsible for providing healthcare. The only reason it's part of the employment picture at all is because government-imposed wage freezes in the mid 20th century made it harder for employers to attract workers, so they started throwing in the stuff we now call "benefits" instead.

      Today, the rising cost of health insurance has become one of the largest burdens on employers and a huge dis-incentive to job creation. Without that expectation of providing "bennies", employers could afford to pay substantially more in negotiable, discretionary cash.

      Whether the burden of paying for healthcare should then be shifted to these better-paid workers to arrange for themselves through the free market (the libertarian approach), or shifted to the better-funded (because tax-paying workers are better paid) government to arrange for universal coverage (the socialist approach) is a very good, debatable question. But tying it directly to employment (the current republicrat approach) is neither humane nor sound economics.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    11. Re:How about the essentials? by lou2112 · · Score: 1

      This is one of the few perks of working for higher ed: good benefits. The pay sucks, but benefits like health care, retirement funds, dental care -- hell, even tuition remission -- are standard fare.

      On the other hand, we don't get anything extravagant. (Thus, us tech folk look lovingly at benefits like the Omni Group, who get free lunch and dinner, and can bring their pets to work.)

    12. Re:How about the essentials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've got to give Kerry a try. We already know bush sure isnt helping.

    13. Re:How about the essentials? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Today, the rising cost of health insurance has become one of the largest burdens on employers and a huge dis-incentive to job creation



      Agreed. My solution to this is to demonstrate to the health care industry that 'health care' is not your top priority. Do this by refusing to donate to organizations that are related to health and medical industries. The doctors and medical technicians make more than you. Why should you donate more of your hard earned money to them. It's not like they're hurting for dollars.

  8. That's nothing... by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll change the place with free snacks to the place with good psychological cimate and interesting projects in a blink of an eye.

    --
    - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
    - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
    1. Re:That's nothing... by Rob_Warwick · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Exactly, a well put together workplace is far more valuable than any perks they may offer you. Yeah, free food is a huge plus, but somewhere that you can actually work on good projects with a sane environment is worth far more.

      I'm a young coder (not employed at present, I have the luxury of being 18 and still living at home so I have no expenses that I don't want.) and my right now I'm hunting for my ideal job. I'm going to university in the fall to make sure I can get some good jobs in the future, but for now all I want is somewhere that I can code and concentrate on it.

      The ideal workplace for me is a desk in a room, no windows, no distractions. A bookshelp, a whiteboard, a couple tables (I plan on paper a lot), a good computer, and enough time given to actually get the work done.

      There's a reason why a lot of hackers (trad. usage) work in the middle of the night. There's nothing to distract. No phone calls, no meetings, no people from sales who think that because you're just staring at the code you can't possibly be busy.

      I'm convinced that many hackers aren't naturally night owls, we just associate those hours with our best productivity/enjoyment, and we change our schedules for that.

      It's not what free stuff they give you, it's how they let you work.

    2. Re:That's nothing... by �ilhouette · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. Back in the "hey day", I switched jobs for more pay, but then three months later it occurred to me that the cliche 'money isn't everything' is true sometimes. I went from a small company where I was able to learn a little bit of a wide range of technologies (and ultimately concentrate on any one of them to further my skills), to a company where they pigeon-holed me as a "windows admin" and made me Ghost desktops all day. Lucky for me, I proved that I was a competant worker at my last job (albeit not exactly loyal) and the VP of Engineering invited me back with a salary match to boot. Yeah, I learned my lesson after that (what a young punk I was only a few years ago). :)

    3. Re:That's nothing... by demachina · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly right. Free meals, free beer, cheap soft drinks are nice and all but they can be synonymous to peanuts the exec's throw to their chimps to reward them for doing good tricks. Free meals are cool but they are there first and foremost to nudge you in to putting in more uncompensated overtime.

      Over the years I've set my priorities from hard experience:

      A. Make sure the company's executive team isn't looting the company through stock options, signing bonuses for their own, interest free loans that turn in to gifts etc. If they are giving them to themselves make sure they are giving them to performers in the engineering offices, too. The more they loot the less there will be for incentives for worker bees and to fund adequate staffing.

      B. If the company goes through a hard patch make sure the execs are sacrificing MORE than the working people, because they are making a lot more. If you go in to one of those "sacrifice" meetings and you have guts ask the head cheese to tell you what sacrifices he and his bosses are making. If he can't answer, gets pissed off or you get laid off for it you don't want to be there anyway.

      C. Opt for a company that will give you a walled office over a cube nearly every time. It indicates they really do value you and they want you to be productive. If they are shoving you in cubes they probably view you at the same level as cattle to be milked, especially if they are all in plush offices. It pretty much sicks if the execs are in cubes too because execs shouldn't me sitting in the middle of a cube farm talking about confidential things.

      D. Make sure the executives have the vision and ability to create a successful product and are building a team to produce one. 80+ hour weeks kind of suck but they suck a lot more if the product ends up being a disaster, since disasters usually mean layoffs versus the payoff that follow success, plus it just feels good to be proud of something you put so much effort in. If the product is successful make sure there is a payoff for the worker bees and not just the execs or you should either:

      A. Aspire to be an exec and learn to do all the underhanded things necessary to become one, golf skills are a must.

      B. Move on

      --
      @de_machina
    4. Re:That's nothing... by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      Opt for a company that will give you a walled office over a cube nearly every time. It indicates they really do value you and they want you to be productive.

      My last job was the first ever (read: "20 years") in which I had my own office with walls and a door. It was also the most miserable, gods-forsaken place I have ever worked. The places where the staff worked in cubes have been... OK. To my surprise, despite being an introverted anti-social hermit, I've been happiest working in places where the staff were put in an open office area. Putting you in a closed office may indicate that they value you, but putting you in a room where you'll be available to interact with everyone else apparently indicates that they appreciate you.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    5. Re:That's nothing... by demachina · · Score: 1

      Guess it depends on whether you are writing code or doing mister answer man. If you are the team architect or an admin then yes you need lots of interaction but I've never really found it necessary to be out in the open to be accessible. Accessibility is more an attitude than a physical state. An obvious problem is most of the people around you may not want to hear a steady stream of Q&A, if it doesn't relate to what they are working on, just so you can feel appreciated. A tech discussion is way better in an office with a white board with the interested people in the room.

      I don't recall any cube farm recently where most people weren't jacked in to music most of the time in a vain attempt to filter out the NOISE.

      --
      @de_machina
    6. Re:That's nothing... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I'll change the place with free snacks to the place with good psychological cimate and interesting projects in a blink of an eye.

      But after a few free beers, they will seem interesting.

  9. Employement? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As the job market gains strength, what are companies willing to do in order to attract the best talent?

    See the news today? 32,000 new jobs for July?

    I still know too many people who consider a perk actually being paid more then a burger flipper. This is probably one of those exceptional places, where the owner doesn't feel the need to line his pocket and gives something back. See how long it lasts.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Employement? by gantrep · · Score: 2
    2. Re:Employement? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also, note that with our current immigration rate- we need 300,000 jobs EVERY MONTH just for population expansion. 32,000 jobs is NOTHING.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Employement? by deanj · · Score: 1

      No, zero is nothing. 32,000 is an addition.

      This is as bad as when people were saying spending increases in government programs were "cuts" because the spending increase wasn't as large as some people wanted in the first place.

      Geesh

    4. Re:Employement? by yasth · · Score: 1

      Were you born in 12th century Europe? I mean there is such a thing as inflation. Let us assume that program in say 1960, you had a job paying $5000 a year, a decent salary for the time. So since it isn't a cut one should keep the salary the same in 2004?

      If you are paying someone in bags of grain or direct representations of them, then there is no need to increase them from year to year if the environment. Money is not so direct. Money loses value as time progresses unless something is done with it.

      Jobs are a bit more complicated but not much. if you have 0 job growth and positive population growth you will end up with a bunch of people who have nothing to do in a few years.

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    5. Re:Employement? by fingerfucker · · Score: 1

      Typical /., where people get modded up as Informative even though they don't cite any sources to support their claims.

    6. Re:Employement? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      32,000 is a NEGATIVE when you've added 240,000 working-age immigrants in the past month- fewer jobs available per capita. And that's what we're adding about now- because if you think this "jobless recovery" is bad, try Mexico.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re:Employement? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Here's a great source for the whole immigration vs job growth thing: Numbers USA

      Most people think they're just racist- until you dig into their membership and the mathematics behind their statments. Even the Border Control admits that between legal and illegal immigrants, we have ~240,000 new Americans of working age EVERY SINGLE MONTH. Let me know when the Labor Department gets a ClueX4.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    8. Re:Employement? by fingerfucker · · Score: 1

      Thanks for those sources, I appreciate it.

  10. Job market getting better? by superpixel2000 · · Score: 1

    Did anyone see the news today? New hires are WAY down... The only perks I've gotten recently:
    1. We get to work 200 more hours this year for the same pay
    2. More responsibility!
    3. Same old free coffee

    Woohoo!

    --
    did you win a free ipod? build a case for it here
    1. Re:Job market getting better? by seestheday · · Score: 1

      free coffee!?! lucky bastard....

  11. Free porn? by jobsagoodun · · Score: 2
    1. Re:Free porn? by VegeBrain · · Score: 1

      Nyah, gimme a free Danish at a porn company.

  12. Perks? by dacarr · · Score: 3, Insightful
    While beer is great and all, it doesn't exactly contribute to the working environment.

    Cafeteria and feeding the employees is nice and all.

    What do I consider perks? HOw about a boss that lets me DO MY FSCKING JOB.

    --
    This sig no verb.
    1. Re:Perks? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I worked for a company that would give us beer friday afternoons, when we where on schedule.
      We where usually on schedule. I would say that we put in more after hours work because we wanted to be drininking beer by 3PM, at the latest.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Perks? by dragonp12 · · Score: 1

      The best perk would be somewhere the job is enjoyable and the company is an employee-friendly one to work for.

      Wow. I've found it!! :-P

      --
      This is me. Don't like it? That's unlucky.
    3. Re:Perks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of the things that they would do is advertise to potential hires "we offer free pop, and LAN parties!"

      Was smtp free, too?

    4. Re:Perks? by stienman · · Score: 2, Funny

      MY FSCKING JOB

      Dude! Your whole job is to FSCK disks? Wow, either you've got a few thousand servers your work with (google, perhaps? I can see a FSCK engineer working their cluster...) or really bad hardware/bad setup/bad administrators.

      Quite frankly, I don't know if that would be a stressful job or not...

      -Adam

    5. Re:Perks? by dacarr · · Score: 1

      Well, you know what they say, if you have to fsck, you're having a crappy day already.

      --
      This sig no verb.
    6. Re:Perks? by swb · · Score: 1

      Until I read your post it hadn't occured to me that it may actually be cheaper to offer a bunch of apparently generous perks (free food/pop, vidgaming, etc) and cut-rate real ones than to offer none of the in-office ones but good health, dental, etc.

      For a 500 person company, free pop would amount to about $120k per year. Add in BS like pizza on Fridays and a "fun" room (2 big screen TVs, PS2/XBOX, LAN setup and a half-dozen gaming PCs) and semi-annual company parties and even if it runs to $500k, you're talking only $1000 per employee per year, and likely much less.

      I guess what I'm wondering now is, have these kind of bennies that seem to make for a "neat" company *always* been a sham to cover up other bennie shortcomings, or is this some twisted new thinking?

  13. Redundancies in the article summary by nytes · · Score: 5, Funny

    Free beer... They offer free breakfast, lunch AND dinner... and snacks.

    Once you say "free beer", saying "breakfast", "lunch", etc. are redundant.

    "Beer" pretty well covers everything.

    --
    -- I have monkeys in my pants.
    1. Re:Redundancies in the article summary by sharkey · · Score: 1

      It IS one of the four major food groups: Meat, Fried, Beer and Red.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Redundancies in the article summary by isorox · · Score: 1

      "Beer" pretty well covers everything.

      Doh, the stuff that buys me beer
      Ray, the guy who sells me beer
      Me, the guy, who drinks the beer
      Far, long way to get the beer
      So, I think I'll have a beer
      La de da another beer
      Tea? No thanks, I'll have a beer
      and that brings us back to doh doh doh doh

    3. Re:Redundancies in the article summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I hadn't heard this one before.

      Note to other observers: sing it to the tune of "Do-Re-Mi" from "Sound of Music".

  14. Perks? Not on your life! by swordgeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I work for an EXTREMELY large company. For the last four years, our perks have been cut and cut and cut again. Our salary increases have been typically half of cost of living in the years we actually get them. Annual bonuses are gone for good. Training has been cut back to less than acceptable.

    Hearing that some companies are starting to give perks again means that the cycle is turning back. I will be so glad to see employers like mine losing all of their best employees next year, because they'll be playing catch-up -- and it will be 'too little, too late' for most of us.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:Perks? Not on your life! by glinden · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Cutting benefits can be dangerous. Typically, with any salary or benefit cut, your best employees (who have the best job prospects) leave at a disproportionate rate. It almost always has a negative impact on morale and productivity.

      Moreover, benefits often are valued by employees at a level beyond the pure monetary value. One of the more interesting books I've read on employee compensation, Strategic Human Resources, makes this point:
      • Benefits and perks can also be particularly powerful symbols of gift exchange, moving the employment relationship from one with purely economic connotations to something more along the lines of a kin or friendship relationship. Salary, wages, and even bonus payments all have the connotation of an economic exchange in which each party should attempt to extract the best possible (narrowly selfish) deal. Some forms of benefits and perks are of an entirely different flavor and can cause the worker to respond with reciprocal gifts or by internalizing the welfare of the organization.

        The psychological leverage associated with providing benefits is likely to depend on whether the employer is a pioneer in providing this perquisite or instead simply seen to be matching the competition.
      Seems like Google understands this. They offer a particularly exceptional benefits package.
    2. Re:Perks? Not on your life! by canadian_right · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your comments about cutting back perks is so true. I worked for a large companie's IT department for 10 years. The whole IT department was sold off in an outsourcing deal, and there were numerous layoffs (mainly management). There have been a number of cost cutting measures and now there is talk of reducing vaction time and other benefits. If this happens everyone with the skills to jump ship will. The current salaries are middle of the road but the benefits are great. If the benefits are cut there is no reason to stay when I can go work somehwere else that has the same crappy benefits but pays 30% to 40% more. Only the people who lack "in demand" skills will stay.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    3. Re:Perks? Not on your life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Moreover, benefits often are valued by employees at a level beyond the pure monetary value."

      Another benefit is that benefits can't be taxed the way money can. Free meals, drinks, and gym memberships could add up to, say, $3000 per year per employee. If the company just paid employees $3000 more instead, $1000 of that might be wasted on taxes, and the employees would be worse off.

    4. Re:Perks? Not on your life! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should consider working for a smaller company. The bigger ones seem to suffer from Dilbertization a lot more than the littler ones.

  15. Someone better tell by mytec · · Score: 3, Interesting
  16. mmm... by mikeeeeeee · · Score: 5, Funny

    free beer all day, personal hammock, and massages every hour....cant beat bein' a kobe cow....

    1. Re:mmm... by Poseidon88 · · Score: 5, Funny
      free beer all day, personal hammock, and massages every hour....cant beat bein' a kobe cow....

      Sure, but the retirement plan sucks.

    2. Re:mmm... by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know, 'chew you up and excrete you out' seems to be the way most retirement plans are handled in the States these days...

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    3. Re:mmm... by sharkey · · Score: 1
      cant beat bein' a kobe cow

      I dunno... Didn't Kobe stick it up the cow's ass?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  17. Fridge Goodies by Jinsaku · · Score: 1

    I work for a small startup in DTC, and one of the nice perks is that the upper-ups keep the fridge and cabinets stocked with drinks and snacks.. a small sugar rush can definately help in some of those late coding nights.

    --
    -- Jinsaku
    1. Re:Fridge Goodies by Gannoc · · Score: 1

      a small sugar rush can definately help in some of those late coding nights.

      "Yes, I often work 16 hour days and nights coding for my company, but they make it up to me by giving me a 25 cent Pepsi, as well as making sure it is cold. God Bless America!"

    2. Re:Fridge Goodies by 1310nm · · Score: 1

      Better than where I work.

      60 cent pop (up from 50 cents a couple of years ago), and the free coffee was taken away for about a month, until the execs figured out that the small amount of money they saved not buying grounds and stuff didn't equal up to the employee anger surrounding their idiocy.

    3. Re:Fridge Goodies by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      Taking the free coffee away at my work would probably increase morale.

      ugh...horrible stuff.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  18. I was their systems/network admin for over 4 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...from 1995 to 2000.

    Analytical Graphics is the *best* place I've ever worked.

    I left because I wanted to do new things. Gawd I miss that place sometimes!

  19. But SW Engineering jobs dropped 15% last quarter! by Cryofan · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics in its July 30 report:
    "There was no recession in the second quarter of this year, but BLS data show 131,000 fewer American computer software engineers employed in the second quarter than in the first quarter of 2004--a decline of 15% in three months."

    So, I seriously doubt that we are going to get anything at all like the late 90s going on for technical workers.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  20. Re:Would you want these employees? by waynegoode · · Score: 3, Funny
    Employees would like or dislike this perk based on their preferences. However, from the company's point of view, I don't think it's a good perk.

    HR dude(tte) #1 "Want kind of employess do we want to attract?"

    HR dude(tte) #2 "How about the kind who want free beer?"

    HR dude(tte) #1 "Yeah! Let's offer a perk that would only attract people who drink a lot!"

  21. I like to start by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Funny

    by asking for them to arrange for Halle Berry to drop by my place on a regular basis. Obviously in the spirit of negotiation I bring along a list of 200 fit actresses and models I will accept as a substitute if Halle is not available.

    It must be said I am not having the greatest of success with this approach at the moment. I guess I have to hope either Catwoman bombs or the market picks up a tad more and in the meantime be happy if they offer me free parking.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:I like to start by Unregistered · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess I have to hope either Catwoman bombs

      I saw the trailer. i think you've got a actress in your future.

  22. Hmm... Slashdoting their HR department? by petra13 · · Score: 1

    Browsing their website, it appears that they are currently looking to hire people for 11 positions. I sense an imminent overload of their mail servers when /.ers all simultaneously attempt to send their resumes.

  23. How about this by KillaForTheScrilla · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess a good perk would be for the company to buy my plane ticket to India when they outsource my job there.

    Language classes would be good too.

    --
    There's only one thing I'm allergic to... Sudden Death. (Danger Mouse)
    1. Re:How about this by FarHat · · Score: 1

      Language classes are totally optional. Most Bongalore firms operate with English as a defacto language.

      -F

      --
      At the intersection of computation and biology.
    2. Re:How about this by Lours · · Score: 1

      I guess a good perk would be for the company to buy my plane ticket to India when they outsource my job there.
      Language classes would be good too.


      That's definitely something I'd consider.
      But I'd opt for a boat ticket for several reasons :
      - a small hollyday break never hurts
      - lets you time to read books and learn about the foreign culture you are going to integrate
      - you get the chance to have a nice tan so the locals will not mistake you with a fat red-burned tourist :)
      - 40 times less greenhouse gases emitted than for a plane flight (and ghg emissions by planes are a real threat, see IPCC documents about this : IPCC)
      - absolutely 0 chances that your boat will finish in the middle of a skyscraper because of a terrorist attack

  24. Free as in 'Beer'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I'd settle for free as in 'speech'.

  25. talent ... average by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    <snip>what are companies willing to do in order to attract the best talent? ... How important are these kinds of perks to the average employee anyway?</snip>
    *cough* It doesn't matter what the average employee wants. These perks are aimed at the top 1-2%.
  26. It wasn't to attract employees.. by RayDude · · Score: 1

    They didn't do it to attract employees. They did it to keep them from starving to death. They made 'em work 100 hour weeks, missing large chunks of their lives and the food was just one way to keep 'em from going home. --Raydude

  27. ummm.... by Compholio · · Score: 1, Funny

    Unlimited free Diet Coke and Coffee.

    1. Re:ummm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      free Diet Coke

      This story is about perks, not ways to poison your employees.

  28. Flextime by Shobimono · · Score: 2, Informative

    Flextime is considered a perk at my company.

  29. AGI has a *great* climate, and it was never boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know. I worked there for over four years.

  30. Liability? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Would you really want to hire employees who would be motivated by "free beer?"

    Seems many places I've worked shy away from alcohol on their grounds. For fear of the employer providing the drink that puts a driver over the legal limit, the driver has an accident, the person becomes an alcoholic and blames employer, etc., etc.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  31. Then, Now, Tomorrow by blunte · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Then (during the "bubble", yes perks were particularly in vogue). Some of the 90s perks were ridiculous. Netscape was famous for many things, and infamous for some of their perks - onsite free sushi bar, roving free masseuse, etc.

    DotComs were offering Ferraris to those who could recruit the most talent. Everyone who was anyone offered stock options.

    When the bubble burst, much of the madness was finally seen as madness, and it all went away. That gave many existing companies leverage to take away benefits - "You're lucky to have a job!". Yes and no.

    I had a friend who was an attorney for Tandy Corporation (Radio Shack). Tandy paid their attorneys ridiculously low salaries (as in $30k/yr for a real estate attorney). When I asked him what the hell was wrong with them, and why they thought that was appropriate, he told me their response: "These guys are just going to come here for a couple of years and leave anyway, so why should we pay them reasonably?" Duh! Naturally, anyone with talent will move along. That's true in IT as well, and options do still exist. Maybe they involve moving to a new city, but they exist.

    Some companies have been doing right all along, and they are rewarded with fierce loyalty and very good productivity. SAS Institute, in Cary, North Carolina, has been providing stellar perks for years. They've remained private, and thus avoided the Quarterly Earnings per Share death-cycle. Imagine if your company had benefits like theirs.

    Other companies could be like SAS if they weren't public, and if their leaders understood what some perks could do for their productivity and employee loyalty.

    --
    .sigs are for post^Hers.
  32. Get your pens ready... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    What kind of perks would you have to have to switch to a job that pay the same?

    I'd switch jobs if the new one was 5 miles closer, or there were more attractive women there.

    One big bonus is the amount of spying that management does. I'm currently self-employed. I bill for the work that I do. When I'm working from home, instead of cigarette breaks, I get pr0n and Slashdot breaks. While a queued task is completing, I can stop for a couple of minutes, check the progress of my downloads or the Slashdot headlines and get back to work.

    It'll take a fair bit more money than I'm currently making to make me give up this life.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:Get your pens ready... by Neil+Blender · · Score: 1

      I'd switch jobs if the new one was 5 miles closer...I'm working from home

      You must have one big house. I'd suggest moving your office closer to your bedroom.

    2. Re:Get your pens ready... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I guess I should have been clearer. :)

      I'm working from home, at the moment. But, when I didn't work for myself, the distance thing was a big factor.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  33. Re:Here's what I want by nlindstrom · · Score: 0, Troll
    Preferably covered in hot grits.
    You forgot to have them petrified first.
  34. Re:Would you want these employees? by SnapShot · · Score: 2, Funny

    I kinda figured that they were referring to a "free microbrews on a Friday afternoon policy" (a la Microsoft) not a "lets keep the fridge stocked with schlitz policy" (a la IBM).

    Just kidding about IBM... ;-)

    --
    Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
  35. Perks by Judg3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ah, well, perks are cool.
    One of my last jobs catered us lunch on Fridays, did the free liquor thing, paid for our healthcare and did a 150% 401k match (Every dollar I put in, they put in 1.50).

    This current job is a hell of a lot better though. Sure, they don't have all the real cool perks. Catered lunch was replaced by Donut/Bagel Fridays, there's no company match for the 401k (Until next year), the healthcare isn't free but they do chip in. But I do get some nice perks, mainly the free college education. I can work my way up to a PhD and it's on the company dime. And they take care of me better then the employer with a lot of perks. There's no pay cap. Well, there is, but if you hit the cap for your position, instead of a raise the company will cut you a bonus check for a few thousand. And they give everyone a certain percentage in stock each year. Overall, even though I have less visable perks, the perks I do get, in the end, equals more money. Bonuses, stocks, and a free education hehe.

    --
    Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    1. Re:Perks by geekoid · · Score: 1

      umm, can I work with you?

      I'll move to Minneapolis.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Perks by Judg3 · · Score: 1

      Well, we are hiring now, and will be for awhile - shoot me an email and I can give you some info :)

      --
      Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    3. Re:Perks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once worked for a company with no perks, where we had to even pay for our coffee. But I got to work with some very smart people and easy going managers. That was the best perk of all: looking forward to going to work with great people. Unfortunately, I had to move across the continent and leave that job.

  36. wow... by templest · · Score: 1

    That's awesome. As long as the companies don't overdue it and start going bakrupt, thus, this little 'perk' thing dies off, I don't mind it, but I don't want the companies going down the drain and screwing the job market again just so I can get a few gym sessions but lose my job 2 years down the road.

    --
    I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
  37. Your questions answered! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    As the job market gains strength, what are companies willing to do in order to attract the best talent?
    Not much more than when the job market sucked. Wait. That's now.

    Are we about to enter another era where employers are willing to make work fun again, in order to attract and keep talent?
    No.

    Will this have any effect on other employers, forcing them to again offer benefits to keep pace and talent?
    No.

    How important are these kinds of perks to the average employee anyway?
    When you've never seen a perk, or had them all taken away with the knowledge that they aren't coming back, probably not very.

    What kind of perks would you have to have to switch to a job that pay the same?
    My perk would be to not have to go into work. I would happily switch to a job that paid the same, but wouldn't require me to work. Is Slashdot hiring?

    1. Re:Your questions answered! by Nova+Express · · Score: 0, Troll

      > I would happily switch to a job that paid the same, but wouldn't require me to work.

      Ah, so you're voting for Kerry, then...

      --
      Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

      http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  38. Well at my office... by otlg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Several employees have corporate gas cards, car allowances (even for non-sales/travelling personnel), corporately paid cell phone bills, corporate laptops, corporate paid internet access, etc.

    We do this because we would rather people get something useful than giving half a pay raise to the government. Plus we try and be flexible on work hours (although on the flip-side we are INSANELY timeline sensitive, e.g. work when you want but get it done by Wednesday 9:00am).

    I'm noticing a trend with friends at other places as well. It's a win-win in my books.

  39. Job Market Gains Strength? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US BLS released the news that in July, the economy added a total of 32,000 new jobs, and revised May and June down 71,000. Doesn't sound like gaining strength to me.

  40. I'd need... by siskbc · · Score: 1
    What kind of perks would you have to have to switch to a job that pay the same?"

    ...free beer. WHAT? You're kidding. What's the company's name? AGI? I'm applying.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  41. Less time, more pay, clean bathrooms by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

    Any other "perks" are for suckers.

    But good for any company who can get their employees to work harder, stay longer, and take less money.

  42. India? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So this company is in India right?

  43. Not hard to answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of perks would you have to have to switch to a job that pay the same?

    Allowed unscheduled bathroom breaks?

  44. How about a chance for a raise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of perks would you have to have to switch to a job that pay the same? Ummm.. How about a chance for a raise within 5 years? My company has halted all raises in the US.

  45. THIEVES!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've been doing that for my employees forever. I never stopped, nor will I. All I ask is that they show up to work on time, and work while they're here. I give all kinds of bennies. Including free colocation (up to a certain bandwidth of course). Gym membership, paid time off to GO to the gym membership. Best Healthcare I can find, Parties, HOMEBREWED beer made by yours truly. 3 weeks vacation time, plus additional time off for any overtime worked that's cumulitive and rolls over from year to year up to a certain point.

    What's funny is I have ALL of the same employees I had 5 years ago when I started this. They know their work inside and out and there's very little they can't handle. I wouldn't trade my crew for anything. I like to think I'm a good boss, and I work WITH my employees, not above them....sadly enough, they make more than I do :(

  46. Perks? by existential+goo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sometimes I think employers try to offer "perks" because they are cheaper than offering real incentives, like group insurance plans and retirement help.

    I worked for a webhosting company recently called WestHost in their support department, and one of the things that they would do is advertise to potential hires "we offer free pop, and LAN parties!" Then, they would hold this over our heads, and if we didn't perform perfectly and clean up management's messes and smile all the while, we got no LAN parties and they acted like we were not deserving of the free pop.

    Oh, and did I mention that they paid us jack crap?

    I really would rather be paid more and have no extra 'perks' as long as they treated me right. I will always be willing to work my tail off for an employer who does that.

  47. You pay for it, one way or the other by retostamm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Economists think that in general, Employees are paid based on their productivity.

    If you create lots of value, you get lots of money, if you create less, you get less. On average that must be pretty close to reality, because if you get paid more than what you create, your average company would go bust right away.

    Now, if you get "Perks" like Gym, free food etc, that's still coming from your total compensation, and on average just makes your paycheck smaller. That's true for Perks as well as "Free" insurance, Social Security and all the other things that "the employer pays for". If the Employer does not pay for it, you would get that money.

    IANAE (I am not an economist)

    1. Re:You pay for it, one way or the other by rleibman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now, if you get "Perks" like Gym, free food etc, that's still coming from your total compensation, and on average just makes your paycheck smaller. That's true for Perks as well as "Free" insurance, Social Security and all the other things that "the employer pays for". If the Employer does not pay for it, you would get that money.

      Kinda, except for the fact of the big black hole that is taxes. Normally many perks are not taxed, so you get 100% of them instead of the taxed 50%.
      Eliminate the income tax. Vote Libertarian.

    2. Re:You pay for it, one way or the other by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you're getting taxed 50% on your income, you're either A) really really bad at figuring out a 1040 (in which case I pity you), or B) making way way more money than me to be in such a high tax bracket (in which case I don't). With such obviously hyperbolic rhetoric, I'd almost think you were running for public office or something.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:You pay for it, one way or the other by kmac06 · · Score: 1

      The (Republican) speaker of the house is supposedly proposing eliminating the IRS and income tax. That would be great. Voting Libertarian isn't gonna get you anywhere, vote Republican :)

    4. Re:You pay for it, one way or the other by rleibman · · Score: 1

      I mention 50%, but that's probably on the low side. Did you take into account sales tax? did you take into account property taxes? government mitigation "fees" when building a house? Car tax? Luxury taxes? the costs of compliance with all kinds of laws, regulations and ordinances at local, state and federal level?
      50%? I wish it was that low.

    5. Re:You pay for it, one way or the other by rleibman · · Score: 1

      Here's the answer to that... yes, from the Libertarian Candidate for president.
      "WON'T GET FOOLED AGAIN: LIBERTARIAN DISMISSES HASTERT TAX PLAN"

    6. Re:You pay for it, one way or the other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Canada I believe the *average* tax rate is now somthing like 62%. After the first $6K, federal income tax starts in at 29% (rising to 54%), provincial tax is half that (15%), GST is 7%, PST is 7.5%. So, even before considering tolls, tariffs, fines, fees, charges, surcharges, levies, duties, assessments and other taxes, someone living at the poverty line is being taxed ~52%. Of course this does not pay for anything expect the cost of collecting taxes: you can expect to pay an additional user fee if you happen to actually need any government service (even an ambulance...$50).

      You, however, live in the US. There, making more money does not mean you pay higher (percentage) taxes: quite the opposite. Capital gains are taxed at a rate that the poor can only dream of and, thanks to GWB, dividends are no longer taxed at all(!). So the greater the fraction of your income that derives from wealth, the smaller %age tax you pay. Lest you think my opinion invalid, here's a link to Warren Buffet's take on that particular situation
      http://www.commondreams.org/views03/052 0-09.htm

      You will notice that, by extraordinary coincidence, M$'s massive one-time dividend this year happened to fall in the first year of the 0% policy (gee, who could have seen THAT coming?). Does anybody feel like figuring out how many dollars this dodge has given Bill Gates ALONE to "trickle down" (in the form of layoffs and offshoring apparently)?

    7. Re:You pay for it, one way or the other by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Yes, I took all of those into account, Would-Be-Senator. I'm sorry if someone who's made your particular lifestyle choices (e.g. building a new house instead of buying an existing one, buying new cars often enough to be concerned about the additional taxes on them, and does the meaning of the word "luxury" escape you?) is experiencing a higher rate of taxation than someone with a more modest income and less self-oriented consumerist way of life, but... that's your own damn fault. Don't be so myopic as to assume that everyone has fscked themselves over as badly as you have.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    8. Re:You pay for it, one way or the other by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      Not true at all. Remember, your employer is paying unemployment insurance, your employer is also matching your social security deductions, and that doesn't include state income tax or city income tax, property tax, sales tax on the goods and services you buy, hidden taxes like gasoline tax or entertainment tax, inheritance tax, luxury taxes, capital gains on investments, etc., etc. Add in service fees (drivers licence, marrage registration, car registration, etc.)

      The average person is probably paying closer to 60-80% of their income to the government in some form.

  48. Basic benefits by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    As a W2 contractor- I'd jump for health care in a heartbeat. Training would be nice too.

    But on the plus side I'm getting 55% of what the company is charging for my time, even if it is only half what I would bring into the company during the dot com era.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  49. Pay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same pay rate? Where have you been? Pay rates has gone down 30%. If I changed jobs, I'd take a serious cut. For the time being, I have to keep this job.

  50. parent not a troll by bandy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    He's really dead, folks. Google for it yourself.

    --
    "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
  51. I know many hate to admit it... by mtrupe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    but the market is back. I've had 3 job offers in the past month, all of which pay 10 to 20% more than I make now. Today I went to my current employer and told them my situation--- they are going to counter offer.

    I think the big perk right now is working from home or at various sites. My current job allows me to work from home 2 days a week. Oh- and I get every other Friday off. One of my job offers has 1/2 days ever Friday. Hopefully I see two trends:

    1. Employers are realizing that we have lives and not forcing us to work ridiculous hours. I make more than I have ever made right now and I never work more than 40 hours a week.
    2. Employers see the benefit of allowing employees to work off site and/or at home. 2 of the 3 offers I have had offer work at home benefits. My current job allows me to work from home. Nice. Why does a software engineer need to be in the office every day anyway?

    Markets go in cycles. We are in a recovery now. Employers are ready to produce again, and in the case of software, that means its time to hire. They realize that outsourcing didn't save them any money, so they are hiring workers right here in the U.S. Good news!

    1. Re:I know many hate to admit it... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Today I went to my current employer and told them my situation--- they are going to counter offer."
      I hope you trust them, becasue for many companies 'Better offer' means will pay you more while we search for your replacement.

      Out of curiousity, what state do you live in?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:I know many hate to admit it... by Gannoc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Today I went to my current employer and told them my situation--- they are going to counter offer.

      Random slashdot guy,

      Do NOT, repeat NOT take that counter-offer. It is the end of your career there, because they know you've been interviewing and are on your way out. The reasons you were leaving in the first place hasn't changed. Now, you'll be at the same place, but they'll be making sure they can get rid of you in 6 months.

      I'm not saying that you're going to be fired in a few months automatically, but you'll be miserable.

    3. Re:I know many hate to admit it... by deanj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mod parent response up on this.

      NEVER EVER take a counter-offer. More money isn't going to change why you were looking in the first place.

      A couple of things the parent post didn't mention:

      If they have layoffs, your name will be on the top of the list.

      Salaries are generally in one pool of money. If you get a raise now, you'll either NOT get one next time raises go around. It's also probable that the people you work will think they won't get as big of a raise because of YOU if the raise they get doesn't meet expectations.

      Plus, if you really want to work for that other company, turning them down how will make it much much harder to go back there to ask for a job. Oh, you can do it, but they'll likely say "oh, that's the guy who was just looking to make more money at the place he was at... don't bother".

      There are MANY more reasons never to take a counter-offer. Do yourself (and your career) a favor, and don't take it.

      Good luck

    4. Re:I know many hate to admit it... by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      I totally understand the reasons not to take a counter offer, and I could explain, but this situation IS different, otherwise I wouldn't consider it...

    5. Re:I know many hate to admit it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My current job allows me to work from home 2 days a week. Oh- and I get every other Friday off.

      Where do you work? Are they hiring?

    6. Re:I know many hate to admit it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't take the counter offer, but instead consider offering them part-time consulting. You're no worse off if they don't take you up on it and if they do you'll earn a little extra dough.

    7. Re:I know many hate to admit it... by Gigantic1 · · Score: 1
      You're right. Go ahead and negotiate salary with your current employers and take the offer if it's better. I've seen lot's of people do it and they didn't have any complaints. (Of course, all of them got fired about 6 months later...but that's just a coincidence, I guess)

      Good luck, and in 6 months time, please keep us apprised of your new job search.

    8. Re:I know many hate to admit it... by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 2, Interesting
      NEVER EVER take a counter-offer.

      I don't know. I can half-support that based on my own experience. I was a severely underpaid web monkey at Borland back in the 90s. As the market boomed, I had a ton of job offers, some for $30K more than my existing salary. Eventually I went to management and explained it. They said they would need a few months to arrange a matching offer. I actually gave them the time, and they actually came through. I spent many months pulling down that fat paycheck and being happy. Thus far, it seems that taking a counter-offer is good.

      After about 6 or 7 months at that pay scale, things started to get ugly at work. I had a new boss who seemed to hate me. It turns out that I made more money than the boss, and when this came to light, all hell broke loose. Soon enough, I had to give up the job. Of course, the next job I got paid $20K more again. So maybe it's best to take the counter offer and then also take the next job with the higher pay? Hmm. I'm not sure what life lesson I can take from my experience other than the market was really good back then.

      I haven't seen a pay increase in four years.

    9. Re:I know many hate to admit it... by tommck · · Score: 1
      NEVER EVER take a counter-offer. More money isn't going to change why you were looking in the first place.


      Unless, of course, more money WAS the reason you were looking in the first place...

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    10. Re:I know many hate to admit it... by Watcher · · Score: 1

      After about 6 or 7 months at that pay scale, things started to get ugly at work. I had a new boss who seemed to hate me. It turns out that I made more money than the boss, and when this came to light, all hell broke loose.
      Ugh, that's never a good situation. Its natural for a boss to want to make more money than those under them, but it is a sign of a bad manager when they take it out on the employee.

      I haven't seen a pay increase in four years
      That's not too unusual right now. A lot of salaries went up signficantly in the late 90s, and the people making them haven't seen an increase because what they are making is so much higher than what the employer typically wants to pay. That may change if the economy really is perking back up.

      Going to your employer and asking for a raise isn't a bad idea, but it may be the only raise you'll see for a few years. Going to them seeking a counter offer isn't such a great idea, though. I've also known more than a few managers who won't give counter offers, ever. They figure if you're leaving now, paying you won't keep you much longer anyway. Or, as the grandparent mentioned, they'll throw you out in six months time.

  52. Hello American IT geeks. by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 1

    The US government provides good healthcare, a good retirement plan, and civil service protections that include going home and having a life.

    Plus, like the Air Traffic Controllers, many of the original IT gurus are close to retiring.

    If you're an intermediate worker bee, you can expect to top out at a GS-12 Step 10, which today pays around $81K in Chicago. Not great, but it's unlikely you'll get laid off.

    --
    My father is a blogger.
    1. Re:Hello American IT geeks. by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Informative

      The IRS just laid off 219 of it's IT staff. ;->

    2. Re:Hello American IT geeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now is the time to cheat on your taxes? Cool.

    3. Re:Hello American IT geeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, yes it is. You are much much less likely to be audited now then ever before

  53. Self Employeed by rf0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Being self employeed I give my self my own perks. So for the long hours, sleepless night I get a meal out at the local pub on a Friday. God I'm a cheapskate

    Rus

    1. Re:Self Employeed by matchboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heh, I know what you mean. Sometimes I let myself take myself out for lunch. I am considering opening an on-site cafeteria for myself. :-p

      --

      Robby Russell
      PLANET ARGON
      Robby on Rails
    2. Re:Self Employeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what you mean, as I'm in the same situation. Thing is, the Friday meal at the local pub is still for me a better perk than I ever had working for other companies for 15 years. There, my perks were free coffee. That was it. No gym membership, no vacation time beyond what was required by law, no beer provided by the employer, no Christmas bonus, and you had to bear your entire costs if you wanted to go to the Christmas party. Bupkuss. Obviously I really really missed out on the gravy train of the late 80's as well as the late 90's. At least I don't have any regrets about being self-employed and losing any perks, because IT'S HARD TO MISS WHAT YOU NEVER HAD. And for the record, these were all large, profitable, American-owned corporations.

      To all those who whine about how they now have to shoulder half the cost of their company-sponsored gym membership, or how the company only treats them every other month (instead of monthly) to the pub, I say you really don't know how good you have it. Poor, poor babies!

    3. Re:Self Employeed by titzandkunt · · Score: 1


      "Being self employeed I give my self my own perks. So for the long hours, sleepless night I get a meal out at the local pub on a Friday. God I'm a cheapskate"

      I'm not self-employed, but I find your "pub lunch" perk extremely unimpressive.

      If I was self employed, at least expect I'd get frequent sex with the boss.

      T&K

      --
      Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
  54. Answers by yankeessuck · · Score: 1

    Disclaimer: I work as a jack of all trades developer in a non-software industry IT department so my answers may not be typical. Just my $0.02.

    As the job market gains strength, what are companies willing to do in order to attract the best talent?
    Nothing. There are plenty of IS workers looking for jobs.

    Are we about to enter another era where employers are willing to make work fun again, in order to attract and keep talent?
    No, not until demand for workers exceed supply.

    Will this have any effect on other employers, forcing them to again offer benefits to keep pace and talent?
    No. See previous answer.

    How important are these kinds of perks to the average employee anyway?
    Not important. I care about interesting projects, competitive salary, raises and bonuses exceeding the rate of inflation and opportunities for career and knowledge advancement.

    What kind of perks would you have to have to switch to a job that pay the same?
    Perks take a back seat to everything mentioned in the previous answer.

  55. Re:But SW Engineering jobs dropped 15% last quarte by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

    Any hints on how many of those Jobs in the US of A are now jobs in India? I know the company I work for as a contractor (large network gear company that starts with a C) keeps moving more and more work to India in spite of a number of issues they have discovered.

  56. YEAH! by changa · · Score: 1

    I hope the company I work for pick up on this trend...

    Then I might eventually get free parking and paper towels!

    *Grumbles about cheap-ass companies*

  57. Does stress and anxiety count as a perk? by kin242 · · Score: 0

    My company paid crap, piled on the workloads and made a lot of empty promises. My perk was being driven out by making my life intolerable. The only perks I would like to see is to actually get treated likea human being for a change!

    --
    kin242.net
  58. There is such a thing as a free lunch by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

    One of the companies I work for gives employees free lunch at a pretty good bar/restaurant on the ground floor of the building every day. Drinks and tip aren't included, but as far as benefits go, that's pretty cool. Hmm.. they did a pretty good burger :) (you can tell I have taste)

    1. Re:There is such a thing as a free lunch by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      That's funny. You know the money they buy your lunch with every day?

      Had you been paid that money instead as salary, you could've pocketed most of that money and used the remainder to make a lunch for yourself, saving yourself money in the long-run.

      Instead, you've bought your boss' clever ploy to make you feel like you're getting something-for-nothing, hook, line, and sinker. I know, because as an intern this summer, I've been wine-and-dined to hell and back, and while it definitely *feels* luxurious, I know I could've been paid more had I not been given so many of the attraction perks I've had.

      Nobel prizewinning PhD economist, Milton Friedman, is still correct: "There ain't no such thing as a free lunch."

    2. Re:There is such a thing as a free lunch by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      Had you been paid that money instead as salary, you could've pocketed most of that money and used the remainder to make a lunch for yourself, saving yourself money in the long-run.

      How much do you value the time you have to spend shopping and preparing your food? How much do you value the annoyance of cooking (presuming you don't enjoy it)?

      There are more things to consider than just money - regardless what the economists, even the Nobel-laureates, may spew.

    3. Re:There is such a thing as a free lunch by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      How much do you value the time you have to spend shopping and preparing your food? How much do you value the annoyance of cooking (presuming you don't enjoy it)?

      There are more things to consider than just money - regardless what the economists, even the Nobel-laureates, may spew.


      Economists would call yours a rational decision in choosing between your time and your money. As you place a higher value on your time than money where preparing meals is concerned, you prefer not to prepare your own meals (at least all the time. I don't either, BTW, but if I'm not being wine-and-dined by my company, then I do prefer to make my own).

      You're right that there's more to consider than just money, and any *good* economist will tell you that. Some things/activities aren't monetarily-tangible (love for your children or spouse, for example, will often exceed one's lifetime earnings in terms of what one might be willing to spend on them), although the vast majority of things/activities can be represented by some amount of money (i.e. some amount of goods/services that could be obtained or is given up in exchange for some amount of time).

      As an intern, I am a college student/budding full-time employee. As such, I have neither much time nor much money, although I am much more monetarily-rich now than I was at the beginning of the summer. This growth of my income has, BTW, made me realize how much I value my time, now that my time is scarce.

      But where making my lunch in the morning is concerned? That's 5 min. of time during a part of the day (7-8AM) when I'm not going to be doing anything else fun/interesting/income-earning besides driving anyway; i.e., I'm not going to be out partying with friends or seeing family again at that time of day. So my time like that in the early morning is really not that valuable to me... Hence, I make my lunches in the early morning, but not at 7PM at night.

      I do purchase my groceries after work, including my lunch food I prepare. But I do that as part of purchasing a basket of other foods, so, since it's part of a routine I'm doing anyway, that time is allocated generally towards "getting food," which I have to do during the week whether I like it or not, unless there's some way to live without eating... Again, that time is not very valuable to me.

      Note that I don't buy said food or prepare it on Friday nights, Saturday, or Sunday because my time on those days is very valuable to me; that is time during which I allocate towards hanging out with friends, getting drunk, playing games, meeting women, etc..

      Speaking of women, I'm told that chicks dig guys who can cook. I don't know much about cooking, but for the chick aspect (as well as personal financial reasons), I'm learning. Thus, cooking is a sometimes-valuable use of my time, because it can lead, sooner or later, to getting laid -- something I place a VERY high priority on. ;)

      Economics owns you, whether you realize it or not, believe it or not, like it or not...

  59. I get free porn by furball · · Score: 1

    Seriously. I get porn delivered to my cube.

    It's just all over the place here.

  60. Gravy train derails. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There was no recession in the second quarter of this year, but BLS data show 131,000 fewer American computer software engineers employed in the second quarter than in the first quarter of 2004--a decline of 15% in three months."

    Well to mouth the party line around here. GOOD! That means that all those "doing it only for the money" are getting out, and leaving the field open for those who "just do it for the love" because we all know they deserve those positions more.

    1. Re:Gravy train derails. by Gannoc · · Score: 1

      field open for those who "just do it for the love" because we all know they deserve those positions more.

      Wow! You code just for love? Tell you what, you can come and do my job for free, i'll sit home and keep the paycheck. I'd love you.

    2. Re:Gravy train derails. by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      I would gladly write code for free, and have often done so. The paycheck is to compensate me for having to put up with managers and other corporate annoyances.

  61. Yes I am by CiXeL · · Score: 1

    Because I don't have the luxury of voting for Bush. I need to put food on my table. I'm one disaster short of bankruptcy.

    1. Re:Yes I am by deanj · · Score: 1

      Basing how you're going to vote for someone based on whether you have a job or not, is stupid.

      Do yourself a favor. Go to Monster.com, or HotJobs.com, and look for jobs there. Not just in your area. Move if you have to. The jobs are out there. You just have to be willing to move to get one if there isn't one in your area.

      If you can't find one after that, go into consulting for a while.

      If you still can't find one, the problem isn't the lack of full-time or consulting jobs.

      It's the person who's trying to get hired.

    2. Re:Yes I am by ffsnjb · · Score: 1

      Sadly, unless you're already in the area for a job, many companies won't even consider you. My monster resume/cover letter clearly states that I'm willing to relocate anywhere within the US, on my own dime and in 3 days or less (nothing better than being single and able to do whatever you want without having to worry about families / SOs).

      I'd love to move to N. Carolina to hook up with some nice jobs there, but I'm never considered because I'm in NY. I don't have the funds to move without knowing I'll have a paycheck in a week, or I'd have moved already.

      Oh well, a job found me through Monster.com so I get to do something a lot more fun in 2 weeks.

      If anyone in Rochester, NY wants to fix digital cameras or thermal printers, I have some really good pull to fill my current position...

      --
      "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
  62. Numbers don't lie by KrackHouse · · Score: 1

    From http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/webfeatures_snap shots_08042004
    "As shown in the figure below, for the past two quarters, the 12-month growth rate of the wage and salary component of the ECI was 2.5%, the slowest ever recorded for this series (ECI data go back to the early 1980s), and even slightly behind inflation for the last 12 months (2.8%). This component of the ECI has not fallen short of inflation since 1995. The trend in wages and salaries tracks labor market conditions fairly closely, slowing consistently throughout the recession and jobless recovery. Other wage series show a similar recent deceleration in the face of persistent slack in the job market (See the July 16 Snapshot for further analysis)."

    Oh, and I did check the news today:
    The nation's payroll growth slowed dramatically in July with a paltry 32,000 jobs being added_ a potentially troubling sign that the rough patch the economy hit in June was no aberration. The unemployment rate, however, dipped down a notch to 5.5 percent last month, from 5.6 percent in June, the Labor Department reported Friday. The new jobless rate was the lowest since October 2001. The payrolls figure and the unemployment rate can sometimes go in different directions because they are derived from two separate statistical surveys. Economists, however, look more closely at the payroll figure as a better barometer of the health of the jobs market. The 32,000 net jobs added in July represented the smallest gain in hiring since December and followed a revised gain of just 78,000 in June, even less than previously reported. May's payrolls also were revised down to show a gain of 208,000.

    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
    1. Re:Numbers don't lie by deanj · · Score: 1

      And the key thing to note is that 32,000 jobs were ADDED.

    2. Re:Numbers don't lie by .@. · · Score: 1

      32,000 added jobs doesn't even keep pace with the jobs necessary to employ those new to the workforce, after accounting for those permanently leaving the workforce.

      In short, 32k jobs isn't even a holding pattern. It's a net loss.

      --
      .@.
    3. Re:Numbers don't lie by mtrupe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You wish. You silly Kerry supporters are running scared, and the rest of us are lovin' every minute of it!

    4. Re:Numbers don't lie by deanj · · Score: 1

      Wrong, added jobs are added jobs. No amount of spin changes that fact. Apparently you WISH what you're saying is the case, but it's not. Sorry. :-)

      And where is your source for those permanently leaving the workforce? ....Oh, right...you don't have one. People bring that out to have this mysterious, scary "people leaving the workforce" when they start losing the argument.

      Face it: Jobs are being created. That might not do whoever you wish becomes president much good, but just saying that jobs aren't being created doesn't make it true.

    5. Re:Numbers don't lie by KrackHouse · · Score: 1

      You're logic would apply if two jobs were added.

      --
      What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
      http://houndwire.com
    6. Re:Numbers don't lie by KrackHouse · · Score: 1

      One more thing :) Do you truely belive that the following information proves that the economy is doing well? "US employers hired a meagre 32,000 extra workers in July, government figures showed, shocking markets worldwide and shattering hopes of a labor market rebound." "Stunned investors sent the Dow Jones industrial average plummeting 147.70 points, or 1.48 percent, to finish at 9,815.33, the lowest close since November 2003." More here: http://news.google.com/news?num=30&hl=en&edition=u s&q=cluster:www%2ejsonline%2ecom%2fbym%2fnews%2fau g04%2f248841%2easp

      --
      What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
      http://houndwire.com
    7. Re:Numbers don't lie by .@. · · Score: 1

      Wrong..

      Bush promised, with his 2003 "Jobs and Growth Plan", which introduced his tax cuts, new job creation. The president's economics staff, the Council of Economic Advisers, projected that the plan would result in the creation of 5.5 million jobs by the end of 2004--306,000 new jobs each month starting in July 2003. The CEA projected that the economy would generate 228,000 jobs a month without a tax cut and 306,000 jobs a month with the tax cut. Thus, it projected that 3,978,000 jobs would be created over the last 13 months. In reality, since the tax cuts took effect, there are 2,565,000 fewer jobs than the administration projected would be created by enactment of its tax cuts.

      Since the recession began 40 months ago in March 2001, 1.2 million jobs have disappeared, representing a 0.9% contraction. To put this performance in historical perspective, the Bureau of Labor Statistics began collecting monthly jobs data in 1939 (at the end of the Great Depression). In every previous episode of recession and job decline since 1939, the number of jobs had fully recovered to above the pre-recession peak within 31 months of the start of the recession. Today's labor market would have 6.2 million more jobs if employment had grown by the same 3.7% average that characterized the last three recession cycles. As for who has been hurt most, private-sector jobs have fared worse than public-sector jobs. Jobs in the private sector have dropped by 1.8 million since March 2001, representing a 1.6% contraction.

      Added jobs each month aren't enough. There has to be a sustained minimum number of jobs each month to maintain the existing workforce, to say nothing of growing the workforce.

      Those minimum monthly new jobs are not being created.



      I also find it interesting that you brought up the election, and mentioned candidates. Nobody you're responding to did. You just assumed it was an attack on Bush. Since you want to stroll down that road, what I've said above is waiting for you at the end.

      Your rebuttal, sir?

      --
      .@.
    8. Re:Numbers don't lie by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      Okay, then. Why don't I give you $20, and you give me $3000. Hey, look, you're twenty bucks richer than before!

    9. Re:Numbers don't lie by ErikZ · · Score: 1


      In essence, you're saying

      "32k jobs isn't enough. I'm not going to link or tell you what 'enough' would be, you'll just have to trust me."

      I hope this style of arguement is as weak in real life as it is online.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    10. Re:Numbers don't lie by deanj · · Score: 1

      Jobs were added in the last period. It said nothing about jobs being lost. If there were, the papers would be screaming that. But they're not.

      You can trot out all the little stats you want, but if they were in fact true, the papers would be reporting it that way.

      They're not.

      So, you're wrong. :-)

    11. Re:Numbers don't lie by deanj · · Score: 1

      Faulty logic, dude.

      Overall, jobs were added. Jobs weren't lost.

    12. Re:Numbers don't lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you Bush supporters are looking typically hateful, gloating at others' misfortune like this, and believing everything you want to believe.

    13. Re:Numbers don't lie by deanj · · Score: 1
      I see you're using old stats to try and prove your point about those 32,000 jobs being added. Let's stick to the point, shall we?

      From the Chicago Tribute, today

      What do the job numbers mean?

      Published August 7, 2004

      The nation's job reports released Friday surprised just about everybody. Companies added 32,000 new positions to their payrolls in July, a much smaller increase than most economists expected. The unemployment rate, though, dipped to 5.5 percent.

      So it goes with economic indicators. The monthly parade of numbers tends to be as fluid as the economy itself, flashing one way, then another. Divining their meaning, like economics itself, involves nearly as much art as science.

      Bottom line--the economy continues to expand and to grow jobs, though not as robustly as everyone would like.

      We're heading into a fall presidential campaign where every indicator will be invested with political significance by both sides. No doubt Sen. John Kerry will talk about the hundreds of thousands of jobs that have been lost since President Bush took office. No doubt Bush will talk about the hundreds of thousands of jobs that have been created in the last year.

      As you listen to that debate, it will help to keep in mind the limits of the data. Take the unemployment rate. All through the most recent recession, the jobless rate never got above 6.3 percent, well below the peak in previous downturns.

      Yet most economists believe that particular statistic understates the real unemployment number. The government arrives at its figure by calling around 40,000 households a month to ask how many folks are working. Sounds straightforward, but it requires a bit of voodoo to project the size of the labor force and determine the proportion looking for work and unable to find it.

      When the economy flags, many of the unemployed stop seeking jobs. The Labor Department no longer counts them once they're out of the market, so their exit tends to drive down the official unemployment rate.

      It's believed by some economists that the number of people who don't get counted has expanded lately. The long decline in manufacturing, for instance, has led many former factory workers to give up looking for work. Young Americans unable to find desirable entry-level positions, in part due to outsourcing and immigration, often decide to continue their schooling instead.

      The rises in temporary help and part-time employment, along with the aging of the population, also chip away at the benchmark jobless rate. The 2 million Americans locked up in prisons and jails don't count as unemployed. Same goes for those on the booming Social Security disability program.

      So it may well be that conditions at their worst last year were just as bad as during the 7.8 percent unemployment peak in the recession of 1992, although the indicator didn't show it.

      So does all that mean Kerry can claim the economy's in worse shape than advertised? Perhaps. But Bush can find evidence, too, that things are a little better than they seem.

      The Labor Department reported that the economy created 32,000 jobs in July, a number that was widely billed as a disappointment. But that reflected the number of people that larger companies say they added to their payrolls. The government also produces a separate report that has turned up evidence of many more new jobs being created among small businesses and the self-employed. The reported 10,000-job increase in manufacturing is also very encouraging.

      The numbers don't tell the whole story, but that doesn't mean they should be ignored. Instead, recognize them for the imperfect guesstimates they are and treat the rhetoric surrounding them with the skepticism it richly deserves.

      You're wrong. Case closed.
    14. Re:Numbers don't lie by deanj · · Score: 1

      Unemployment went DOWN last month. From 5.6 to 5.5 percent.

    15. Re:Numbers don't lie by deanj · · Score: 1

      I said that jobs were added last month, after a couple of people said that there were job loses. Unemployment is down from June to July, 5.6 to 5.5.

    16. Re:Numbers don't lie by deanj · · Score: 1

      OK, here's a link, or just read the Tribune story above.

      http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/chi-04080 70 278aug07,1,7014346.story

    17. Re:Numbers don't lie by .@. · · Score: 1

      "Unemployment went down" means "the people currently drawing unemployment benefits went down".

      I think you're forgetting that unemployment benefits have a limited window of availability for any individual. Unemployment figures do not account for those who are unemployed and no longer on the unemployment rolls because they've been unemployed so long.

      --
      .@.
    18. Re:Numbers don't lie by LMariachi · · Score: 1
      The point is that the absolute number of jobs is meaningless devoid of context. It's like saying a family of five with two packets of ramen in the pantry has more food than the bachelor next door who has only one.

      When expressed as jobs per capita, the number went down.

    19. Re:Numbers don't lie by .@. · · Score: 1

      From the Washington Post, August 6, 2004:

      "Payroll jobs remain 1.5 million short of where last winter the White House said they would be by now. To avoid being the first president since Herbert Hoover to preside over a net job loss, Bush must hope for 372,000 new jobs a month in August, September and October."

      As you said, case closed.

      --
      .@.
  63. Re:Would you want these employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of places provide free beer. Chiron used to roll wheelbarrows down the cubes of good free beer on Friday afternoons.

    At my present job, I'd have to provide my own beer but drinking and coding isn't necessarily a bad thing.

  64. Job perks I want.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What kind of perks would you have to have to switch to a job that pay the same?

    Not having to work with complete f*cking imbeciles would be nice.. but I guess that's asking too much of any job, eh?
    yeah, go on, mod me off as a troll, you know I'm right.

    -- PHB + Claw-hammer embedded in skull = An increased I.Q.

  65. hah by matchboy · · Score: 1

    Job perks. Best job perk that I heard recently was that due to "popular demand" they were going to bring back Bagel Wednesday!

    --

    Robby Russell
    PLANET ARGON
    Robby on Rails
  66. Re:Or maybe... NOT!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just left a small company. . . Consideration? I think not! the boss only showed up to work to not do anything. Hell, if he didn't show up the day was more productive. Perks? none. . . we didn't even have water at work, bring your own. Well maybe one perk. . . you could get almost any day off. . . oh wait. . . I forgot. . . that was cause frequently you wern't called in to work cause the uper employee's didn't bother to do there job and get work for us grunts. . . result - I want to work in corpruate america (even if I dread how much it will hurt) just so i can get more than 4 hours a week and a , "Sorry, we don't have any work for you!"

  67. My girlfriend... by CiXeL · · Score: 1

    ...did what you did and now has spent almost 10 years paying it off when she was unable to get telivision and film jobs because they make movies in other countries now and have outsourced all the jobs.

    I have 2 friends who have molecular bio degrees and can't get any decent internships to make money because theres no funding for anything. One has continued onto grad school fearing the real world and burdening his parents some more. and the other one works at an asian koi fishery place where they raise koi because he can't get a job.

    I look back during the time my parents wanted me to go to school and realize i would have been ROYALLY fucked with NOT A CHANCE IN HELL of getting a job had I gone for a CS degree.

    1. Re:My girlfriend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound so negative and whiney about this whole situation. If you're sitting at home trying to start a business that is *losing money* (as every new business does for a period), perhaps it makes a bit more fucking sense to go get a job that brings in money to your family? It might not be much, but it's more than the negative number you're bringing in now. Stop whining, start flipping hamburgers or whatever it is you CAN find.

    2. Re:My girlfriend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just graduated with a BS in CS this June. I make 63k a year. I worked my ass of in college, I graduated with honors. I applied for literally hundreds of internships and when I landed one I did a damn good job and they offered me a job long before I even finshsed school (which I took and finished school at nights).

      If you had gotten a CS degree you would have a fine chance of getting a job. You just have to recognize a degree is not a gurantee. You have to work for jobs now that the bubble is burst and thats not likely to change. It's also no reason to sit around whining. If your smart and your good at what you do you will always find work, there may be some tough spots where you are unemployed for a couple months, but I know plenty of people graduating and getting jobs. I also know plenty you aren't getting jobs, and honestly, most don't deserve to get them.

    3. Re:My girlfriend... by jrockway · · Score: 1

      > I look back during the time my parents wanted me to go to school and realize i would have been ROYALLY fucked with NOT A CHANCE IN HELL of getting a job had I gone for a CS degree.

      I know plenty of employed CS people. All the CS professors, in fact, have CS degrees AND a paycheck. CS is not a dead field!

      And anyway, at least you have a girlfriend :-)

      --
      My other car is first.
  68. Re:I would. by VidEdit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, I wouldn't want employees to be motivated by beer. But I would want employees who appreciate a sense of community and who feel they are truly valued. By providing perks at work you get employees will want to reciprocate the treatment they received back to their employer and will feel a pride of accomplishment and a loyalty to their employer. This will translate into increased productivity and profits.

    --
  69. Sorry to hear that man =/ by CiXeL · · Score: 1

    I'm in a similar boat. If my girlfriend loses her job we're moving to oregon or florida. We'll just put everything in a uhaul and leave. Its getting soooo bad. =/

    1. Re:Sorry to hear that man =/ by Steffan · · Score: 1
      • I'm in a similar boat. If my girlfriend loses her job we're moving to oregon or florida. We'll just put everything in a uhaul and leave. Its getting soooo bad.


      Please don't move to Oregon. Our unemployment is already too high. May I suggest Florida instead?

      j.k. :)

  70. Seriously! by CiXeL · · Score: 1

    I get laid off every fucking time the market burps.
    I'm getting sooooo jaded.

  71. And once again... by thepeete · · Score: 0

    None of this will happen in Canada

    --
    My Karma is so low that even my own postings are beyond my current threshold
  72. No perks are worth switching jobs. by Gannoc · · Score: 1

    What kind of perks would you have to have to switch to a job that pay the same?

    Just some free advice: Unless the perk is worth 15% or more of your salary, don't give up your job for random crap that costs the company nothing.

    I'm not saying don't take any risks, but is it really worth having to switch jobs, prove yourself, lose senority, etc in exchange for $3.75 of free popcorn every month because its "cool"?

    1. Re:No perks are worth switching jobs. by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      I agree, for the same money it's not worth it. Unless your current boss is a flaming asshole. Some of the textile companies that have had so much trouble the last few years fall into the FA catagory.

      A friend of mine is the head programmer at one. In 2000 he had 14 programmers in his dept. Now he has 4 and still trying to do the same work. The bosses are in for a surprise as soon as better jobs open up. There will be no one at that company that knows the system or software!

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  73. Dogs by StefanJ · · Score: 2, Funny

    My dog is in my cubicle with me today.

    Unfortunately, it comes with a cost: She has to watch "Animal Planet," as output by one of the digital set top boxes we are testing, and has been trained to whine whenever she sees macroblocking or other artifacts.

    Stefan

  74. Oh, come on by LizzyDragon · · Score: 1

    My only perk is $5.25/hour and some control over when I work (although it's normal for shifts to start at 4AM). Then again, maybe the fact that I'm a part-time worker who is also full-time college student has something to do with the lack of perks . . .

  75. Apples and oranges... by cuberat · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You mention the job thing and then proceed to rant about the stock market. There's no particular correlation between the two - in fact, I could argue (but won't) that having fewer employees is a way to maximize profit and drive the company stock price up!

    Not to mention that, while the number of new jobs created was pretty small, at least it was positive. Or that unemployment fell from 5.6% to 5.5. That's pretty low to be called 'bad.'

    I just finished off 8 months of unemployment by landing a new gig at a much better salary than my old job, and in the past month have received an increasing number of calls from recruiters. I'm not saying we've warped back to 1998 (oh, the glory), but it is getting better.

    The sky is not, in fact, falling.

    --

    I'll tell you what the 'effect' is! It's pissing me off!

    1. Re:Apples and oranges... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mention the job thing and then proceed to rant about the stock market. There's no particular correlation between the two

      That would be because there's little correlation between anything and the stock market. Those people really exist in a lala-land full of irrational emotional response. Of course that doesn't stop people from trying to correlate it to something. Today it's down because of low job numbers. Tomorrow it will be up because oil prices are down. The next day, it will drop because the president's dog died. The day after that, it will be up because oil prices are up.

      If there is a correlation, somebody's keeping it a secret.

    2. Re:Apples and oranges... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that, while the number of new jobs created was pretty small, at least it was positive. Or that unemployment fell from 5.6% to 5.5. That's pretty low to be called 'bad.'

      If it was outpaced by the number of "new" entrants into the market, then it was negative growth wise. As it's sorta like inflation. You must have at leats that many new jobs only because these extra people have created new demand.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    3. Re:Apples and oranges... by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      The correlation is based on earnings and it always has been. I know you are thinking "The earnings have been great, over the past few months why the slump" The answer is because it is only a few months, we went 2-3 years with stocks like Bank of America have forward multiples of 28. Eventually it came crashing down, and just like that, I bet we see a pretty good spike once the election is settled if for no other reason than the emphasis on a Spanish style terrorist attack will be muted.

      Stocks are a predictor of the future, when the future is not clear, neither is a stock trend.

      --Joey

    4. Re:Apples and oranges... by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      Stock price is related to expected future earnings (discounted by a suitable interest rate) only indirectly: through expected dividends, and also through the net value of the company as a whole given the possibility of future acquisition.

      There's already wiggle room dependent on the time frame in which dividends will actually be paid out (despite the M&M theorem), and in the interest rate you use, but the key issue is EXPECTED.

      EXPECTED earnings depend strongly on the current state of "animal spirits" in stock traders, as well as actual events.

      The feedback loop of a bull market also can have a strong effect: the rising price indicates someone expects future earnings to be strong, so it causes others to revise their expectations upward, bidding up the price. A bear market has a similar feedback mechanism: falling prices indicate someone believes future earnings to be weak, causing others to revise their expectations downward.

      When technical "analysts" can still find an outlet for their voodoo "support level" nonsense, you know the stock market isn't based on a rational evaluation of earnings.

    5. Re:Apples and oranges... by justins · · Score: 1
      I just finished off 8 months of unemployment by landing a new gig at a much better salary than my old job, and in the past month have received an increasing number of calls from recruiters. I'm not saying we've warped back to 1998 (oh, the glory), but it is getting better.

      The sky is not, in fact, falling.

      For you.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    6. Re:Apples and oranges... by andrewgaul · · Score: 1
      Not to mention that, while the number of new jobs created was pretty small, at least it was positive. Or that unemployment fell from 5.6% to 5.5. That's pretty low to be called 'bad.'
      The small number of jobs created, 32,000, is insufficient to keep up with inflation of the working-age population. The zero number you should use is 150,000.

      The unemployment rate only measures the number of people collecting unemployment insurance, and not the number of people without work. When your benefits expire, you are considered nonworking, but not unemployed.

  76. Free Beer's nice and all but what about benefits? by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd want a job with 401k, pension, 2+ weeks vacation time when you start, and bonus...or are those now completely dead in the US except for executives?

  77. perks I'd like by danharan · · Score: 1

    I'm looking for a job right now, so...

    -HR monkeys that know you can't program in HTML, don't expect you to have a degree or know how to do javascript/html/css/jsp and run a database/app server/do Linux scripting (hire a webdev and a DBA/sysadmin, for crissakes).

    -A PHB that know that know what methodology they are using, and is willing to send a poorly written spec document back for fleshing out when it's obvious crap.

    -Brownies? Pop? That's cool, but how about some water and healthy snacks while you're at it?

    -Vacation time: ok, staying with an employer more than a year is a stretch for me, but if it did happen, how about 4-6 weeks vacation like they have in the civilized world? I'd rather that than an extra 10% salary.

    -Oh, and the gimmicks... enough already! If I'm frustrated, I don't need to take it out on your office plush toy. We may be geeks, weird, have allergies to idiotic small talk, but we're not in kindergarden anymore.

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  78. The Hidden Agenda of a Perk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A company that offers free meals is one that says to me "here, we want to make it easy for you to stay here at the office as much as possible. Look, you don't even have to leave to eat!"

    To me, that says they want to try to suck up as much of my time without paying for it as possible.

    Ummm, no. I'll pay for my own meals, and eat them on my own time, thankyouverymuch.

  79. Bad choice of industries, Bub. by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    "Are we about to enter another era where employers are willing to make work fun again, in order to attract and keep talent?"

    If you aren't seeing perks, you're working in the wrong industry, because they've never really gone away. Far be it for me to mention a job outside the IT industry, but my job at a major airline offers plenty of perks, the biggest of which being free travel. As much as I lament it sometimes, it's no more or less stable than the tech industry, which by and large isn't.

    It's all a matter of where you've worked these last few years.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  80. Perks do exist... if you work at a Uni by MacBorg · · Score: 1

    I'm an intern at the MIT media lab - total flex-time, free espresso, full access to BorgLab hardware and supplies for personal projects (within the bounds of reason) Also, i have parents who work at other universities in the Boston area (BU in my mum's case), so my tuition for the next four years is covered. college will cost $44,000 for 4 yrs (room, board, books) rather than $160,000-170,000. Good perk, natch?

  81. I get free porn-Handi-wipes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Seriously. I get porn delivered to my cube.

    It's just all over the place here."

    The porn, or your sperm?

  82. After I showed this article to my boss... by FauxReal · · Score: 2, Funny

    He punched me in the back of the head and told me to get back to work.

  83. Re:But SW Engineering jobs dropped 15% last quarte by deanj · · Score: 1

    ....And yet, monster.com and hotjobs.com are bursting with companies wanting to hire people.

    Weird, eh?

  84. To those who b!tch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stop sulking and open your eyes, the market is desperate...even YOU might be able to get a job.

    Last spring I graduated from college, with a liberal arts degree, and within 3 months had an entry level IT job paying 30% more per year than it cost me to attend that insitution. It was tough work, but 9 months later I was approached with two job offers in the span of two weeks that far exceeded what I was making. Now, I'm now making 25% more than I was at my previous job (base, and now I get paid for overtime if I choose to work it). My work week has been shortened by 10 hours, and my benefits have drastically improved.

    My new job has catered lunches and free vending machines on each floor, flex-time, options to tele-commute, gym facilities, and tons more vacation time.

    Stop the self-perpetuating downward spiral and go get a job.

  85. Re:But SW Engineering jobs dropped 15% last quarte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! Someone said that there are fewer employed, so you go and look at a site where people are looking for employees to prove that there are fewer employed! Things don't work like that, dumbass.

  86. I get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all the unpaid overtime I want.

  87. Welcome to the Bush economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Dumbass OP didn't realize that the number of IT jobs is actually decreasing .

    Christ! I wish there were a decent candidate to vote for this Fall! Bush is a ditwad in love with large corporations who screwed the pooch on the Iraq war and Kerry is a tax-and-spend liberal who can't make up his mind. Both are liars; either one as president will ruin the U.S.

  88. What I wouldn't give for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What kind of perks would you have to have to switch to a job that pay the same?

    A competent manager!

    I'd give up all claims to free food (dearly though I love it) for a manager who is as good at his/her job as I am at mine.

  89. You get em, I lose em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can promise you that benefits are NOT coming back at wireless fon company name deleted. I've had more of my benefits taken from me the past year then I even knew that I had. And the best part? We can only use 400 minutes a month on our wireless phones or its out of pocket. Nevermind this is a wirless company!

  90. But they are hiring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft needs 7000 resumes.

    http://marketwatch-cnet.com.com/Microsoft+needs+7, 000+resumes/2100-7343_3-5281874.html/

    Of course you can bet that they are mostly looking for very hard-working, youngish, low paid, highly-qualified people, so in the end they won't actually hire that many, same as every year...

  91. Fantastic "Perks" Are available by H00T · · Score: 1

    30 days paid vacation + 15ish holidays Free Travel Free College up to Masters Free Medical & very low Co-Pay Dental Free Housing Tax Free Food Alotment Sounds Good right? URL:http://www.airforce.com/ I've been in 10 years now and love the "perks"

    1. Re:Fantastic "Perks" Are available by KillaForTheScrilla · · Score: 1

      Sadly, the Air Force is cutting people too. The whole "Force Shaping" thing is kind of a bummer.

      --
      There's only one thing I'm allergic to... Sudden Death. (Danger Mouse)
    2. Re:Fantastic "Perks" Are available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but they practice age discrimination. They won't let you join if you're over a certain age.

  92. Job perks? I will settle for job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Laid off in March 2001 after "the greatest peacetime economic expansion in history" (AKA dot com + telecom bubble) ended. Worked 5 months at half my old salary since then. Good thing I didn't put all my retirement in Worldcom stock like Bernie told me to. I only wish I had saved more. If I had lived then like I live now and saved the difference, I could retire.

    Anonymous Phil

  93. Re:But SW Engineering jobs dropped 15% last quarte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you believe what you see on those web sites, then I have a bridge to sell you.

  94. the perks that matter by metamanda · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'm doing contract work right now... no perks and I take care of my own health insurance. (Though I do work from home, which is nice.) I'll be hiding from the real world in grad skool for the next 5-7 years, and hopefully by the time I emerge 1)the job market won't suck 2)I'll be badass enough to be worth wooing.

    But you know what? I'm not going to particularly care about free beer (though I do like beer), or a foosball table, or free dinner. The kind of "perk" I want is not having to have my dinner there. Good maternity (and paternity) leave. Flexible hours. Maybe day care. I want to work at the kind of place where it's OK for me to bring well-behaved kids into the office if I need to. Where it's OK for me to be part-time for a year. I don't want my career to suffer unduly if I think my family is important. I don't want to work long hours until I burn out.

    And as I'm writing this, I wonder what the hell is wrong that I regard this sort of basic sanity and moderation as a "perk". The perks of the dot-com boom were great fun for self-absorbed twenty-somethings... which is what I am now, but I won't be forever.

  95. Not wanting to hire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You obviously haven't ever applied for any of those jobs. You'd get a better response forwarding your resumes to /dev/null.

    1. Re:Not wanting to hire by deanj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I didn't say post your resume there. I said look for jobs there. People that post resumes there are looking for trouble.

      If you do what I said, and look for the jobs there, companies do post them. If you see a company you want to apply to, contact them directly.

      This DOES work.

      How else do you get a job at a company that you have no inside contacts with?

    2. Re:Not wanting to hire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever used an agency site? They go to great pains to make sure you don't know what company is advertising. The description is always vague, mentioning only key skills. And to apply you must submit your CV to "the system". If you recognise a job at an average agency, then you are doing well.

    3. Re:Not wanting to hire by deanj · · Score: 1

      That's why I specifically said to use monster.com or hotjobs. You can tell what companies are advertising with them.

      Resumes sent into sites like that are a sure way of NOT getting hired. Every headhunter that sees that resume, grabs it, and throws it to every company they can. Multiple resumes come into a company from different sources, and if HR is screwed up enough (and they usually are) to not date it, they'll toss a candidate rather that look at the lawsuits.

  96. recent MBA grad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a recent MBA grad from one of the better schools, I was at a interview today with a mid sized firm. The interviewer asked me what my salary expectations were, I replied that I could command 125k to start with two weeks vacation.
    The interviewer sat back in his chair, put his palms together and brought his hands up to his face and looked at me pensively. He said that the company was looking to make an offer of 200k per year, 6 weeks paid vacation, matching 401k, full dental and provide me with a company car.
    I just about fell off my chair, I said "your kidding me, right?" He laughed, got up and made a motion to the door, "Yeah, but you started it"

    1. Re:recent MBA grad by DreamTheater · · Score: 1

      Well...what happened next? Did you get the job? I am starting MBA school myself. What is the job outlook of late?

  97. How unemployment is arrived at. by CaroKann · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since so many people are going to mention the unemployment number, you should look at what that number actually means.

    This site spells it out in detail. http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm

    I would like to point out that the government does not simply make use of those people applying for unemployment insurance to arrive at the unemployment figures. This is a survey.

  98. well it depends... by chochos · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it "free as in beer" or "free as in speech"? :)

    1. Re:well it depends... by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      Is it "free as in beer" or "free as in speech"? :)

      How does one answer that question if there is a company producing public domain products and provides free beer?

      On the other hand, some things one does not question.

  99. Computer jobs are coming! Uncle Sam wants YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Know how to read Farsi or C? Between the ages of 18 and 34? Who needs unemployment when you can be gainfully employed in the US Military! That's right boys and girls. Even those who deny the possibility of a draft after this election year are not ruling out the possibility of "those who could fill specialized positions in certain fields (e.g., health care, linguistics, computer technology) being conscripted."

  100. Re:Would you want these employees? by mcrbids · · Score: 1

    Employees would like or dislike this perk based on their preferences. However, from the company's point of view, I don't think it's a good perk.

    I don't know. What if you are a construction company? A good, cold beer at the end of a hard day can be very, very nice.

    I do agree with your implied point, though, that the fringe benefit should be appropriate to the kind of employee you want to attract.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  101. perks... of a sort by tverbeek · · Score: 1
    My new job gives me perks like being able to go home at 3 or 4 PM every day, and I get to take computer equipment home with me for keeps. The catch is that the gear I can take is all 6+ years old, and I get to go home that early because the budget only covers paying me for 6.5 hours/day.

    But seriously, I did take this job for "perks" of a sort, eagerly quitting a job that paid a couple thousand a year more. The perks include: a boss who treats me with respect, a department attitude that focuses on what we can do for people rather than what we won't do for them, the opportunity to do a variety of things from one day to the next, and yes: the assurance of always getting to go home while it's still light out (even in December) and the chance to play with (and make useful things out of) "obsolete" old-world Macs. These are the kind of perks that don't cost my employer anything (on their balance sheet), but which make a huge difference to me.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  102. Sample code of free beer motivated code by syousef · · Score: 2, Funny

    intywinty *hick* maaineee(intagar noOfArgyWargggies, Char $#@% argyWargies) [{
    printFFFFFFFFFF("Hello there buddy, I loveee you *hick* *snore*\n");
    }))) hehe

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  103. Re:But SW Engineering jobs dropped 15% last quarte by deanj · · Score: 1

    Pure FUD, Mr. AC.

    You use those websites to do a mass search of jobs, and then check the real companies to see what they have posted.

    Try it. It works.

  104. It's not "free" if I paid for it! by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    It's *really* poor taste for major airline employees to brag about all their great perks in front of the people whose taxes are paying to bail out the airline industry's multi-billion dollar debt.

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  105. Re:But SW Engineering jobs dropped 15% last quarte by ChilyWily · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Right on - I work for a multinational as well and my even after my group was 'downsized' by about 70% to India while the work load went up by 100%, they are now getting us 'help' from India. Three Indian programmers; who will then be rotated into 'other' groups but they won't hire one local person. The joy of work is gone - most people now work to keep their jobs rather than work to do anything meaningful.

    Economy improving? Ask those who are in the unemployment line.

  106. Perks I get at work. by edunbar93 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh yeah, perks are coming back into fashion alright! Look at the stunning package I get:

    Free ADSL!(I work at an ISP)
    Computer upgrades every 5 years! (for my workstation, not at home)
    Air conditioning! (We just replaced the old clunker at work)
    And, um, an occasional day where the tech support calls aren't so frequent and I can actually get real work done! W00t!

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  107. that's MY call by LuxFX · · Score: 1

    Job perks will come back when I say they're coming back, dammit!

    (*Note: I'm self employeed. I don't care if job perks are coming 'by in style' or not.)

    --
    Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
  108. Best perk: leave after 8 hours, no unpaid overtime by SpecialAgentXXX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about you guys, but I could care less about about company "perks." All I care about is that after my 8 hours + 1 for lunch are over, I'm out the door. The current IT shop that I work for is like that since we are a satellite office a thousand miles away from the main corporate office.

    Besides, what's the point of a gym membership "perk" if you are too tired to go after a 10+ hour day coding, +2 hours commuting?

  109. BLS numbers say the job market is weak by Wansu · · Score: 1



    We've seen 3 months in the last 42 where we had 6 figure gains. But the breakdown of those jobs showed most didn't pay near as much as the jobs lost.

    Talking about perks seems like wishful thinking.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  110. What a load of bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  111. Where do you live? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    I feel for you.

    Its terrible to see anyone be this humiliated and have your family suffer all because some asshole CEO wants a bonus to outsource your job. Its wrong!

    Since slashdot gets 40k hits a day why dont you mention where your from and your qualifications and hopefully someone reading this could help or know someone who is hiring? Its worth a thought.

    If I were a manager or CIO I would certainly would not mind looking at your resume and would feel glad to help someone else who is looking a hand out.

    I am young and got kicked out of the white colar workforce early on and luckily did not have a family. I am at home at 27 going to school and finding any job. I am hoping I never get in a situation like this again and it sucks for anyone who has to go through it.

  112. Yeah, right. Keep telling yourself that, kid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  113. Failed to mention by nilspace · · Score: 1

    What they failed to mention in the articles, is, at least when I worked there, the developers actually foot the bill for the beer on Friday afternoons. Typically, during the week some developer was responsible for a large snafu that broke the software build or something else very heinous. It was then their responsibility to go out and fetch/pay for the beer. Of course, it was still a nice perk. ;)

  114. Hmm..Let me think about this by op00to · · Score: 1

    No.

  115. And the Analytical Graphics Inc web site says... by wintermute42 · · Score: 1

    If you go to the Analytical Graphics Inc. web site "careers" web page and search under "Information Technology" you get...

    Sorry, there are currently no job positions available in Information Technology. Please check back later.

    As many have noted in previous posts, there is still not that much hiring going on.

    On the positive side, it speaks well of the company that they offer the perks, even when there are not openings and they would probably not have a hard time hiring new people.

  116. Yes--Tech Firms are Hiring (includes job post) by John+Murdoch · · Score: 1

    Yes, stronger.

    Yes, please--do check.
    For starters, check with the U.S. Dept. of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics--which is the agency that tabulates and reports on job gains and losses. Any statistical discussion of employment and employment trends in the U.S. will inevitably use BLS data. And the data, as you've heard in the press, is that unemployment has been declining, and net employment is up, at least since the 4th quarter of 2003. (It may be longer, but I didn't look beyond the "at-a-glance" index on the BLS page I linked to above.)

    Employment overall is one thing--but how about geek employment?
    I cannot comment about geek employment nationwide--but I can comment about geek employment in the New York-Philadelphia metropolitan area. In short, we're past the tipping point, where recruiters are calling up to offer jobs, instead of not bothering to return your calls for positions. That inevitably has the effect of driving up wages--either direct wages (pay to you) or indirect wages (benefits, free lunch, etc.).

    How much of that is smoke?
    A lot of people are skeptical about headhunters, and whether they really have the jobs they claim to have. I can't say. What I can say, though, is that my employer is actively recruiting, and we will be making a major effort at on-campus recruiting in the fall.

    Digression: in fact, I have an open req for a co-op student who is majoring in either software engineering or computer science, for the Spring 2005 semester. The student will be working on implementing an existing commercial application on Linux using the Mono implementations of C# and ASP.Net, and PostgreSQL. Prior experience with Linux is an absolute must, prior experience with C# will be a strong plus, prior experience with databases is a strong plus, prior experience with PostgreSQL would be nice. Contact me at jmurdoch-at-Lutron-dot-com for more information.
    1. Re:Yes--Tech Firms are Hiring (includes job post) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A linux "company"? You'll all be looking for work soon enough.

    2. Re:Yes--Tech Firms are Hiring (includes job post) by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Problem is those B.L.S. job "projections" are forever wrong and being revised downward.

      The B.L.S. measures unemployment as those people receiving unemployment benefits - the number of jobs that allows for those benefits have been shrinking dramatically over the past 20 years. Other problem is the B.L.S. automatically marks people whose benefits run out as NOW BEING EMPLOYED! SORRY, it just means their benefits have run out - quite probably they still don't have a job or are now homeless.

      If you are able to do arithmetic - just research the growing number of jobs being exported - the shrinking number of jobs being created - and the increasing number of people in this country.

      The real numbers don't lie......

  117. Perks, schmerks by jjoyce · · Score: 1
    They offer free breakfast, lunch AND dinner, gym and snacks

    They probably do that because they expect that you're gonna be there at those hours!

  118. does anyone mind telling my boss by m2bord · · Score: 1

    that air conditioning and a lunch break are not considered perks

    --
    Is it 5:30 yet?
  119. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is anyone else worried that a company that writes
    non-game products like 'battlespace management'
    is written by people with access to a free hangover?

  120. My job perk, currently. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    having a paycheck not shorted by payroll.

  121. Re:But SW Engineering jobs dropped 15% last quarte by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, I seriously doubt that we are going to get anything at all like the late 90s going on for technical workers.

    Stop It! You're scaring DeVry.

  122. uh what's your definition of a benefit? by waspleg · · Score: 1

    every single thing on that list is an excuse to leave work

    pretty soon you'll get teh "benefit" of a cot in your office and a free towel for the showers on your floor cause the furthest you'll have to go is to the basement to see your kids in the FREE childcare facility

    so who is really benefitting? i bet some prick with a graph showing hours at work vs extra dollars whored off their salaried backs sold this to management.

  123. The problem is... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    Lets say you *DO* relocate to somewhere in BFE for that "good job"....

    And then the company goes belly-up (like my last few tech jobs), or the company does another round of layoffs, or it's just not the job for you.

    Unless you had a seriously kickass savings (which wasn't even usually true BEFORE we all started dipping into them to tide us through these doldrums), you're now *TRAPPED*, out in the middle of godforsaken nowhere, in a one-company town, with little chance of escape, and few or no options.

    Whereas by staying in San Francisco; by not running away in failure, by riding the recession out here; yeah, I'm stretching it on a low-paying "survival job". But once things get back to normal, I'll be right back in the middle of things, and I'll have the freedom to take a chance on a job that might not work out. And if I DO pick another sub-par company, a new job will be waiting for me a five-minute walk down the block.

    AND, aside from some of the fancier clubs and restaurants I don't frequent on my current budget, I get to keep most of the rest of the advantages of living in The City; and that's something that's hard to put a price on, but very VERY valuable.

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
    1. Re:The problem is... by ZenShadow · · Score: 1

      Well, having previously worked at Healthnet in Woodland Hills (and having a family member that still does), I can tell you that (a) Woodland Hills is hardly BFE, and (b) The company is *definitely* not going to dry up any time soon.

      So look it up.

      Since it's a health insurance company, however, don't expect stellar free health benefits (never have figured that one out...). Decent, but not stellar. Damned insurance companies ;) ;)

      --
      -- sigs cause cancer.
    2. Re:The problem is... by deanj · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about taking a job in a one-company town? Move to a place were there are multiple companies you can go to if things don't work out. That is just common sense.

      My point was that too many times people are married to where they're living now, and are unwilling to move to a new place. There are companies that do full-relo packages, so leaving out the "I can't afford to go" argument, the real bottom line is that people don't want to move.

      And that's a helluva lot different when people say "I can't find a job". That's fine... I just wish people would say "I like this city, I don't want to move, and I can't find a job here".

      Moving sucks. Moving away from a place you like to live in REALLY sucks. But if it comes down to it, you either have to be willing to move to a new job, or you're trapped in the old place with a great city to live in, and a rapidly dwindling bank account.

    3. Re:The problem is... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1
      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

  124. Re:Would you want these employees? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    The absolute best free beer was when I was working summers at the old O'Keefe brewery in Montreal. On Fridays evenings (students usually worked evening/night shift), the union regulars brought up cases of cold draft (i.e. straight from the fillers) from the third floor and if you were an experienced student working the uncasers or the soaker, you were expected to partake. (The soaker used a damned hot caustic-soda solution to remove labels and mice from the bottles. A cold beer was very nice between fishing exploded bottle fragments out of the soaker loader.)

    Mmm, nothing better than that!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  125. Hardware / Low Level Jobs out there by xtal · · Score: 1

    I do hardware design / low level and embedded programming. There's been pretty steady demand for the past few years; I saw the end coming when I graduated from EE for software engineering. Guys who couldn't tell me what a stack was were doing "IT".. sure, opens the field up - but dilutes the market. I did communications / network programming when I graduated, then got myself into low level embedded design as fast as I could. The lower level the better. Nobody ever wanted to do driver level or lower work .. so I figured I'd try.

    Something those coming up should look at. It's a lot more frustrating than software design - try writing code when the only reliable debugger you have is printf, and even then not really, because you're writing it on beta development software for a nonstandard OS on unfinished prototype hardware. :)

    It's very rewarding when you see your product being produced, and it's got blinkenlights you designed, and such. :)

    To anyone finding work - the sad reality that I have accepted is that the odds of being able to settle in one area prior to retirement are very slim. I honestly don't know how I'd have kids - work is steady, but everything seems so unpredictable.

    --
    ..don't panic
  126. Re:Best perk: leave after 8 hours, no unpaid overt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the funny scans from all the other cubes if you walk out before 7pm. Screw that.

  127. Work from home. by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
    A work from home job (with a preference for free software).

    That's all I really want. I'm 3x to 4x more productive, I rarely have to work over 40 hours, I never get sick from co-workers coming to work when they SHOULD BE HOME ON SICK LEAVE.......

    I'll come to work 2 times per year...?

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
  128. Re:Would you want these employees? by big+tex · · Score: 1

    I don't know. What if you are a construction company? A good, cold beer at the end of a hard day can be very, very nice.

    Hell Yeah.
    As a construction Engineer, I can definitely say that the only thing we do more intensely than work is drink.

    No seriously- my first day on the job: Boss comes up to me at about 3:00, gives me a twenty, and says, "Beer. 4:30. Conference Room. There better be at least a six pack of Heineken." He then turns around a walks off.

    --
    I think I need a new sig here.
  129. For starters.... by ztwilight · · Score: 1

    How about a job offer instead of the eternal contract position? (like 18 months worth...) That would be very nice...

    --
    Who moved my sig?
  130. Sounds like the Army by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the Army. Enlist today! See exotic lands, like Iraq and Afghanistan. Free meals and all the beer you can carry.

  131. Why the hell don't you have savings? by j.+andrew+rogers · · Score: 1
    Seriously. I see all these reasonably well-paid geeks that were making decent money for years who are in the gutter in less than 12 months after becoming unemployed. There really is no excuse for not having a decent amount of money saved up after all this time.

    I have only limited sympathy for people who don't save any money and the expect everyone to break out the violins when it bites them in the ass. It isn't the the fault of the government, Bush, or anyone else that you are fiscally irresponsible. I'm not exactly the definition of fiscally responsible, but I managed to scrape by for two years while unemployed and another year and a half working at a startup where I make so little I might as well be unemployed.

    So quit yer whinin'. I don't want to hear it. You pissed all your money away on frivolous shit for years on end (and yes, without knowing anything about you I'll bet you spent at least half your money on frivolous shit -- I used to be the same way) and now its time to pay the piper. What a pathetic lot.

    1. Re:Why the hell don't you have savings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dude, this guy was supporting our economy in the strongest way possible - by increasing consumer spending to his limit.

      I totally feel for him. During the late 90s I went from poor to coulda-retired-wealthy-but-didn't-sell-in-time to darn-i-need-to-work-again thanks to some famous .com stocks I gought using your suggestion of "saving" money. I would have been way better off spending it all on expensive toys. Worse, that $170K salary from the good old .com days isn't there for me anymore, so I had to settle for much less than that.

  132. "Free" beer by DrCode · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's not really "free" as in beer, but "free" as in speech. So they have to pay for the beer, but it comes with its recipe. And they can use that to make their own beer, as long as they include the recipe with any modifications they've made.

  133. Who cares? by DrCode · · Score: 1

    Okay, WE do. But I've come to the conclusion that "middle America", the sort of people that support GWB, don't give a s#!t if the geeks they made fun of in high-school are seeing hard times. Hell, they've put up with declining job opportunities for years. Their average salaries are around $35K, so they're not going to feel sorry for a bunch of nerds who were making $100K, and who might now have to flip burgers.

  134. It's a trick by seanmcelroy · · Score: 1

    Every company I looked at thus far that offers free food, showers, snacks, etc almost always routinely requires employees to work mandatory overtime for one reason for another. What at first looks like a cool perk is actually an attempt to remove the excuse for you to ever go home.

    --
    Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. -Thomas Cardinal Wolsey
  135. Quite right. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I have been working for 4 years witha decent salary and could live for a year with my cash savings.

    I just don't understand what the grand parent poster has done with all those years of loyality.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  136. Reading comprehension is not your strong point.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The guy is looking frantically for a job, he has not found it.

    For him the tax cuts have been "pie in the sky" as the Brits say.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  137. Free Beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a summer job as a dishwasher in my student days, but it did offer 2 free beers a day.

  138. Nonsense. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Other companies would pay me the same without the perks.

    Perks are a no brainer, you get things for free or cheaper than if you had to provide them yourslef (private health insurance comes to mind, I only have to pay the respective tax, far cheaper than getting insurance myself).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  139. Instead of "perks" by ChronoWiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "How about, instead of all the free donuts and beer, you just give me a raise?"

    With a raise I can choose to buy my own donuts and beer and consume them at a time of my choice, rather then my employer's.

  140. how much does your job suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of perks would you have to have to switch to a job that pay the same? ...an offer.

  141. How about a 40-hour workweek? by Gigantic1 · · Score: 1
    How about a 40-hour workweek, a stable job, and some decent benefits? Those would be some nice perks. Remember when a large part of the workforce enjoyed those kinds of perks?

    For a change, a little stability would be nice. I mean, wouldn't it be nice to know that you would probably have a job next year, so you could do some real mundane things like plan for that "Vacation" you've been putting off for years - or put some serious bucks into your 401K?

    I'm tired of chasing cheese. Seems like all the cheese I've been finding lately is less tastey than what I once had - and I think this applys to most. When does the rat-race end, and living begin?

  142. I think of turning Japanese by Facekhan · · Score: 1

    Free lunch and gyms in the building seem very Japanese style to me. Its a way of reducing overall stress for the employees. By not having to worry about where you are going for lunch (and by not having to pay for it) you reduce the daily stress. Also its a small, relatively, cheap gift to employees that breeds goodwill. It also increases the amount of time worked and reduces the issue of people taking too long for lunch. My last job was awful and the pay sucked but the occasional free lunch day made it bearable long enough to make a little money and get out.

  143. No perks for anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems the majority of people posting here get no perks at all... Perhaps a move to Australia may be a good idea for all you yanks...

    At the company I work for (the regional head office of a very large multinational), I get:
    - Car - okay for personal use as well as work
    - Cellphone - okay for personal use as well as work
    - Misc computer equipment for personal and work use (such as a USB key and PDA)
    - Tickets to various theatre performances
    - High quality printing and copying (it's a photocopier company (and no, not Xerox!))
    - National and International flights and hotel stays (work related, but lots of free time to do my own thing)
    - Lunch (during training courses (run by me) only)
    - Coffee
    - CocaCola/Pepsi/Mountain Dew
    - Orange Juice
    - Water
    - Beer at the end of the day
    - Plus a fairly reasonable salary with 4 weeks annual leave

    All for my 40 to 50 hours a week in a support/testing/documentation type role (although my business card says "Manager" - mostly as I wouldn't get a car otherwise)

  144. Perks? by CountBrass · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well I currently have: a company car (they pay the insurance and maintenance), a guaranteed 10% of salary additional bonus for each full year I stay, full health care for me and the wife, 24 days holiday. Oh and pension scheme that the employer contributes 5% of my salary to.

    I think that's pretty much standard in the UK- the only thing that's changed for me after 3 months on the dole about 2 years ago was I lost my long service leave entitlement (it used to be 27 days).

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
  145. While I'm glad I have a job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and kept it through all this, I just want some fucking insurance. AFLAC don't cut it.

  146. Fancy laptop (replaced every year) and Siggraph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nough said.

  147. Re:Free Beer's nice and all but what about benefit by RenaissanceGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Those don't sound like hard qualifications to meet.

    I know of a place local to me where the company offers 50% 401k matching (up to 3% company contribution), there is a pension-plan that is contributed to at about that same rate, (contingent on the company making a profit, and it hasn't failed to make a profit for over 20 years), there is a monthly bonus consisting of 5% of the company's after-payroll revenues distributed among the employees, and at the end of the first year, you'll have acrued 2 weeks of vacation time, usable in hourly increments, with the amount of vacation that you acrue going up each year. Also, there is a flex-time program that allow employees to take time off on one day and make it up on other days.The company health and dental plans are, I believe, ~50% funded.

    Sound good?

    Well, it's a maufacturing job, and I'm pretty sure that they are only hiring for production positions. Starting wage is $7/hr.

    Still sound good? Didn't think so.

    Benefits aren't everything.

    --
    What is the difference between a small revolutionary change and a large evolutionary change?
  148. Um, no by John+Murdoch · · Score: 1
    "...the number of jobs that allows for those benefits have been shrinking dramatically over the past 20 years."

    Um, no.

    Unemployment insurance is not a "benefit" that an employee may or may not get. It is an entitlement, funded by payroll contributions paid by the employer (entirely in most states, but split with the employee in others). Part-time jobs typically are not covered for unemployment--but any full-time job is. And full-time employment in the U.S. has most certainly not been "shrinking dramatically over the past 20 years." (To the contrary, full-time employment has increased in that time period.)

    Your statement about how the BLS counts people receiving unemployment benefits is half-right. Only people receiving unemployment are counted as unemployed--where you're mistaken is in thinking that once a person's unemployment has run out, the BLS regards that person as employed. That's not how it works.

    The BLS determines employment based on statistical extrapolation of employment data polled monthly from a broad cross-section of businesses across the country. Years ago, when I was the business manager of a small publishing house, I got a monthly survey form from the BLS, which I would fill out and send in. That's how the BLS can report on growth (or decline) in manufacturing, service, or farm-sector jobs: they're surveying employers in different job sectors across the country (and across the economy).

    If you read the BLS documents, you'll find cautions against using unemployment figures derived from state unemployment reports and comparing them with employment data derived from employer reports. The unemployment data are hard numbers--the total of new claims for unemployment insurance, for instance. The employment data are statistical projections from voluntary surveys. (If you forget to send the form in they nag you--but you can always drop out of the survey entirely.) You can't correlate the two--it is a perfect example of "comparing apples to oranges."

    1. Re:Um, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either my post was screwed up in the uploading or you misread it. I DIDN'T say employment was shrinking but that those jobs eligible to receive unemployment benefits - or those employees eligible to receive unemployment benefits - was shrinking - especially given the enormous growth in the restructuring to temp, contractor and part-timers!

      The validity of those employment projections from those business surveys has become highly suspect over the past decade. Not only is it poor statistics - but please go over the results and the revised numbers over the past four years - there is little or no correlation as the variance is far too great. And I stick to what I said originally about the BLS counting individuals whose benefits run out as now being employed. One need only compare the discrepancies in their numbers and reports to see the obviousness of that!

  149. Re:Free Beer's nice and all but what about benefit by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 1

    Those benefits and the wage is $7 an hour...that's very surprising. I worked a manufacturing job on my summers off from college, no benefits of any kind, 2nd shift payed $6.50 an hour. The vast majority of the workers including me were "temporary" workers, allthough there were some fledgling efforts to start unionization for better working conditions and pay--so the only way those guys could have gotten benefits at all was if they were union, I imagine.

  150. What kind of perks are we talking about? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I think the point is that we are starting to see a return of 'perks' as an incentive for talent as the job market gets better.

    But what kind of perks? You can separate several distinct types:

    • Flexi-time is a good bet in this industry: it's of great value to many employees, and costs the employer almost nothing (and they probably more than recoup whatever they lose in increased productivity anyway).
    • Share options are the other way around: they may have great value to the employee, or they may have none at all, but they could cost the company significantly. They can still be worth something -- I've just made a little on some for the first time -- but I doubt many people would consider them much of a perk after what happened post-.com-boom, unless getting in early with a very promising start-up.
    • Health care, gym membership, etc. are somewhere in the middle: they may have a value to some employees, but probably quite a few would rather just have the money to spend as they want instead. I've never really understood this kind of perk.

    As an employee, things like flexitime and "pillow days" are great for me. Options are nice as-well-as but not instead-of your regular package -- I'd be very unlikely to accept a below-par salary/bonus package in exchange for options. I have no interest in the third kind of perk, and would much rather have the money to spend on my first home, since houses are ludicrously expensive around here.

    I'm not sure this discussion makes much sense until you've identified what sort of thing you're going to call a "perk".

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:What kind of perks are we talking about? by klmth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Health care, gym membership, etc.

      Obviously the point is to encourage the staff to work out, since taking up exercising usually leads to healthier employees. This pays in a smaller amount of sick days, more productive employees etc.

      Now, if they gave the cash, they would arguably not see the same benefits.

    2. Re:What kind of perks are we talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I should find such as company. The one I work for is so cheap I'am even afraid to ask for travel expense if they send me anywhere.

  151. My job perk by doombob · · Score: 1

    Free lunch. To all those naysayers, there is such a thing as a free lunch.

  152. Blah blah blah by lorcha · · Score: 1
    I grew up in a country(Switzerland) where the education system is not targeted towards the rich(can afford to pay) , the athletes(get scholarship to play golf, lucky ones !) and the geniuses(get scholarship also). It's a country where every kid has a chance, no matter how rich his parents are.
    Well, I guess you got what you paid for in your free education. Do the Swiss take time out of their US-Education-system-bashing to learn math?

    In the US, we have state-sponsored schools, which are mostly funded through taxes and endowments. To give an example, to go full time at my Alma Mater costs $2933.12 per semester. It cost less when I went there, but whatever. Say you spent your summers temping at $12/hr. That's $8000 (you pay no income taxes with income that low, but even if you somehow had to, your HOPE credit would more than counteract it, so you are really gonna pay no income taxes). If you can live at home and mooch off the parents, relax, you're done. If not, don't fret.

    Take a job in the computer lab at $7.50/hr for 10 hours/wk. That's about $300/mo to sit there and do your homework. Live in a coop, eat ramen, rice, and beans. In four years, relax. You just worked your way through school with no loans and no mooching off the parents.

    Surprise, my friend! You can work your way through school in the US no matter how dirt-poor you are and graduate debt-free! Hopefully now you'll quit spreading misinformation about US Universities being restricted to the wealthy and athlectically gifted.

    Incidentally, how does access to education work in Switzerland? Is it like in Germany where if you can't get into Gymnasium, you're basically fucked and get to go to the Realschule and learn to be a plumber? The US education system is looking way better from where I'm sitting, I gotta tell ya.

    P.S. I know you're gonna say, "but what about healthcare when you're living on that shoestring?" Nice try, but health care is free through the Univ.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  153. Re:Computer jobs are coming! Uncle Sam wants YOU! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Tried that- they didn't want me- something about the fact that during the last gulf war I made the public suggestion that being a beserker was the best way to survive any military firefight.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  154. Learn to look for jobs by lorcha · · Score: 1
    You know, I was about to rant at you. Rant about your 11 months worth of savings after a 23-year career (were you ever planning to retire?), your starting an underfunded business (the experts say the odds are stacked waaay against you if you can't fund your operations for at least 3 years, preferrably 5), your wife not working, your daughter not going to college, your inability to control your expenses, your not moving to where you can find work, and your blaming it all on the Republicans. Don't get me wrong, I want the GOP gone as much as you, but it's time to quit bitching and take control of your life.

    Learn to look for work. What worked for you 23 years ago will not work now. Learn to interview. Quit reading slashdot and read everything on this site about how to fix your resume, write a cover letter that will increase your chances of getting an interview, conduct yourself during an interview, and basically just get yourself back on your feet!

    Also, fricking network. Somebody you know knows somebody who needs you.

    Looking for work at your age sucks balls, but it can be done. Practice interviewing with your wife/friends/whomever will indulge you. The resume should get you the interview (leave the dates off, if you must), the cover letter should ask for an interview, but the interview itself... that's when you sell yourself, and you must perfect that sales pitch.

    Above all, good luck! You can do this. (no more slashdot!!)

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  155. You too? by lorcha · · Score: 1

    I've been having the same problem. But at least I knew going into the deal what a jackass my boss was.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  156. IDAE (I Detest Armchair Economists) by lorcha · · Score: 1
    IANAE (I am not an economist)
    Agreed.
    Economists think that in general, Employees are paid based on their productivity.
    Name one.

    Current economic theory (current as of, say, a few hundred years ago or so) holds that there is a Labor Market which is subject to the laws of Supply and Demand. It is similar in nature to the Product Market. Your mistake is to only consider a factor of Demand while ignoring Supply.

    Why else would a teacher make less than a garbage collector when a teacher, with specialized training, is providing the education for the future generations and a garbage collector mearly transports plastic bags across town, a function you could easily do yourself? Because there is a short Supply of people willing to spend their days smelling rotten garbage.

    If you create lots of value, you get lots of money, if you create less, you get less.
    If you, retrostamm, provided a lot of value for my business, I would fire your ass in a heartbeat if Bob down the street would be willing to provide that same value for less money. I'd me an idiot not to.
    Now, if you get "Perks" like Gym, free food etc, that's still coming from your total compensation, and on average just makes your paycheck smaller.
    Aha! A correct statement! But what is your point? You better believe it makes your paycheck smaller, but to what degree, is the important question. Your employer is getting a group rate at that gym, so if your gym membership would cost $100 retail, your employer does NOT have to deduct $100 from your paycheck. Benefits like your employer-provided health insurance, etc, are being paid for with pretax dollars. If you had to buy it yourself, it would be with post-tax dollars (to the extent that your health care expenses are less than 2% of your AGI blahdy blah blah). So your employer is providing you a monetary benefit without it costing them a dime, so they don't have to lower your salary to fix your "total compensation". Which makes your conclusion:
    If the Employer does not pay for it, you would get that money.
    Completely and utterly wrong. Your total compensation is set by the laws of Supply and Demand, and your benefits package truly is a benefit to you.

    Now get back to work and quit trying to do mine.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  157. READ THE PARENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the best summary of how be in-demand I've ever read. Some of it is obvious, but it's written so cogently that it's one for the notebook - regardless of your profession.

  158. Only 2 weeks holiday! by lonely · · Score: 1

    Jesus, 2+ weeks.

    In the UK even the worst jobs offer at least 24 days + 7 public holidays. In my current job I have 35 days + 7 days public holidays.

    Geez, to live in a free market economy....

  159. All I want... by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

    I don't request free beer or gym, that's just bullshit. I didn't get a raise in 3,5 years.
    I'm forced to work with granma's technology because nobody cares about improving our products' quality, our productivity or training people.
    The one only affects me, but the second is really nasty on the future of my department, but apparently nobody gives a fuck about anything beyond the next week.
    As soon as the market increases, hastalavista, baby. And the only ones they will have there are the scrap nobody wants anyway. The same as saying, they'll go down the can.