Hardly so. Whether BTC has a future as a currency or not is very much up for debate, but its current market cap is a statistical error in the grand scheme of things.
Specially since no one really seems to understand what it entails. The current administration has been really successful in framing it as a free market issue; it is kinda sad to see everyone discussing along those terms.
Maybe because the investgation was triggered by a DNI report which was subsequently investigated by the FBI and led to a special counsel being appointed after Trump fired the guy looking into the election which made him president.
Yes, they demonstrably are, and trying to validate them by using fringe hard-right blogs as a source is, to say the least, irresponsible.
This behavior of trying to justify positions by throwing a blanket of ridiculous counterclaims backed with no credible evidence is, sadly, really common nowadays. So yeah, i disregard bullshit that adds zero value to the conversation. That's not how arguments work.
As a quick example though, the current investigation into Trump has nothing to do with the Steele dossier. Zero. Nicht. Nada. Null. But, please don't let facts destruct your makeshift reality.
That was a pretty damn good report, BTW, following the exact definition of "unbiased": presenting a very complex issue from both sides. I guess such a thing is not common in America these days.
...One of the most divisive Presidents in US history famous for his identity politics and class-warfare and attacks on political/ideological opponents using agencies of the Federal government like the IRS.
Slashdot Mirror
Net neutrality is not a bandwidth issue. You can already pay your ISP for different bw plans.
Hardly so. Whether BTC has a future as a currency or not is very much up for debate, but its current market cap is a statistical error in the grand scheme of things.
Specially since no one really seems to understand what it entails. The current administration has been really successful in framing it as a free market issue; it is kinda sad to see everyone discussing along those terms.
Not that i think Twitter is an overly complicated platform, but i really think you're oversimplifying here.
We did...
*clap emoji* *clap emoji* *clap emoji* *clap emoji*
Read my post again. The answer is simple and right there.
"A good thing"? Where in that clip, exactly?!
3:45. "If you are fleeing war, wouldn't you do anything to protect your family".
I recommend a reading comprehension course. Stat.
Hahahaha no.
Maybe because the investgation was triggered by a DNI report which was subsequently investigated by the FBI and led to a special counsel being appointed after Trump fired the guy looking into the election which made him president.
See? Real facts are not hard.
WaPo, not WSJ. My bad. Still, the point stands nicely.
Okay... Are the claims false?
Yes, they demonstrably are, and trying to validate them by using fringe hard-right blogs as a source is, to say the least, irresponsible.
This behavior of trying to justify positions by throwing a blanket of ridiculous counterclaims backed with no credible evidence is, sadly, really common nowadays. So yeah, i disregard bullshit that adds zero value to the conversation. That's not how arguments work.
As a quick example though, the current investigation into Trump has nothing to do with the Steele dossier. Zero. Nicht. Nada. Null. But, please don't let facts destruct your makeshift reality.
For fucks sake, you do realize you provided a link to the WSJ to prove mainstream media doesn't report shit?
Yeah. If theconservativetreehouse.com says it, it's case closed!
PS: You really should read into how FISA courts work.
"A good thing"? Where in that clip, exactly?!
That was a pretty damn good report, BTW, following the exact definition of "unbiased": presenting a very complex issue from both sides. I guess such a thing is not common in America these days.
Sorry, you mean the same Trump who is actively bashing FBI officials who dared investigate the POTUS?
You're seriously calling the BBC "biased"?
Jesus H Christ...
...One of the most divisive Presidents in US history famous for his identity politics and class-warfare and attacks on political/ideological opponents using agencies of the Federal government like the IRS.
C'mon man. It's puff, puff, pass.
Is it any good? The movie was so terrible i honestly lost all previous interest.
Yes, we do. We live in an age where the POTUS lashes out via Twitter on a daily basis.
The contrast with the current administration is so depressingly stark...
How soon before social rankings start impacting their everyday lives? Not much at this rate.
Wow, you really understand how climate works.
I was told Face ID would change everything!
C'mon, you have to appreciate it. He's the ultimate troll.
They'll end up introducing the same regulations Obama put in with a different name. Go GOP.