"The Mr. Robot series centers around the theme of online privacy and security. One of the 10 guiding principles of Mozilla’s mission is that individuals’ security and privacy on the internet are fundamental and must not be treated as optional."
So yeah, let surreptitiously install plugins on everyone's browsers.
This is akin to removing anti-monopoly laws, you moron.
It is amazing how free-market loving Republicans are so happy to sign legislation that allows a handful of companies to control a gigantic market. See also: historical stance on debt and the new tax bill.
Tim Cook's claim that FaceID is 20x more accurate than TouchID was kinda ridiculous. It is a neat technology and from what i hear it works well, but it is impossible to have face recognition that doesn't trigger false positives with relative ease. Telling people there's a one in a million chance that FaceID will mistake someone else face with yours is irresponsible.
As an Argentinian some parallels between Trump and recent Peronist administrations are chilling, to say the last. Google Cristina Kirchner's "Ley de Medios" (Media Law), an ill-fated attempt to push legislation reforming media licenses. It main goal was to kill the Clarin Media Group, a stern oppositor, and they weren't really subtle about it either.
There's always Chromium, you know.
You bet they did. Hell, they're even remarking how the plugin is a "Firefox exclusive" right in the explanation press release.
"The Mr. Robot series centers around the theme of online privacy and security. One of the 10 guiding principles of Mozilla’s mission is that individuals’ security and privacy on the internet are fundamental and must not be treated as optional."
So yeah, let surreptitiously install plugins on everyone's browsers.
Seriously, WTF?!
The real surprise would be if they didn't find any evidence of this.
This is akin to removing anti-monopoly laws, you moron.
It is amazing how free-market loving Republicans are so happy to sign legislation that allows a handful of companies to control a gigantic market. See also: historical stance on debt and the new tax bill.
Define "inherent value".
Yes, it does. The real question is whether you, as an end user, care about it.
https://amolosdomingos.files.w...
Slow news day, /.?
So you're saying this is revolutionary?
That makes sense, thanks. Both the story and the linked article weren't really clear.
How can you possibly have a root account without a password?
You certainly can, at least on most *nix flavors. Not the greatest idea though.
So, logging as root without password works on High Sierra if there's a root account without password?
Anyone expecting TouchID or FaceID to provide iron clad security has incorrect ideas about what they are for and what their limitations are.
Apple seems to do. ApplePay, for example, is authorized by FaceID by default.
Next year?
https://findbiometrics.com/440...
Tim Cook's claim that FaceID is 20x more accurate than TouchID was kinda ridiculous. It is a neat technology and from what i hear it works well, but it is impossible to have face recognition that doesn't trigger false positives with relative ease. Telling people there's a one in a million chance that FaceID will mistake someone else face with yours is irresponsible.
And how they managed to fix it via software.
I have a rugged Thinkpad 12" around that's still one of the most comfortable laptop keyboards i've ever used.
Yeah. This is exclusively my thing and no one has else argued the same.
https://www.economist.com/news...
https://www.washingtonpost.com...
https://www.thedailybeast.com/...
If it's any consolation you're not the first country going down the populist road.
As an Argentinian, your not to bright are you.
Dunno. I'm bright enough to know the difference between to and too.
^^^^ This.
As an Argentinian some parallels between Trump and recent Peronist administrations are chilling, to say the last. Google Cristina Kirchner's "Ley de Medios" (Media Law), an ill-fated attempt to push legislation reforming media licenses. It main goal was to kill the Clarin Media Group, a stern oppositor, and they weren't really subtle about it either.
Fair enough. Sign up for whatever you want, but don't pretend something is not hate speech only because you agree with it.
That was not hate speech, no matter how much you want to fucking redefine the term.
That is the actual definition of hate speech. Are you really that illiterate?
https://twitter.com/realdonald...
...But Trump isn't a normal POTUS...
^^^ This. For anyone else this would be a complete non-story.