Slashdot Mirror


User: netmask

netmask's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
39
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 39

  1. Re:Whatever happened to on 1.5GB HDs On a 1" Platter · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yah.. These were designed by scientists at IBM's Almaden Research Center.

    "Scientists in the lab discovered a way to manipulate the crystal's structure with lasers and store data three-dimensionally in holograms within the crystal's volume. The greatest benefit of holographic storage is that huge amounts of data locked in the crystal matrix can be accessed instantaneously. The iron-doped lithium niobate crystals are grayish in color and the size of Las Vegas dice. Although still in the experimental stage, they may one day replace hard drive platters as a storage medium."

    also:

    "The only rewritable material that could replace a hard drive is single-crystal lithium niobate, and writing to it requires an argon-ion laser that's about 4 feet long and weighs 10 pounds. But the real reason Kryder has doubts about holographic storage is because regular old hard-drive technology may make it unnecessary. Using new materials and magnetizing methods, he believes that a one-terabyte (1000GB) notebook hard drive could be a reality in five to six years."

    (both quotes from pcworld.com articles)

    Take a look at some of the pictures of the prototypes and much more technical information HERE

  2. Re:Most users too clueless... on My Short Life As An Unintentional Porn Spammer · · Score: 1

    I did the same thing.. I set it up as something like "ihatespamsomuchyoushouldalldie@earthlink.net"

    and sure enough.. a year later, a TON of spam. But, they swear they dont sell their user lists.

    yah, sure.

  3. Od' to news.google.com on New Stem Cell Source - Your Bone Marrow · · Score: 1

    http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&q=stem+cell+marr ow&btnG=Search+News

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2590279.stm
    A little more info.. Goes over some uses.. Also the hope to eleviate the christians ignorance^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H moral problems.

    http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20021219-122 30 4-2447r
    another article.. but doesn't really say anything new.. they just piped it through rev a couple of times, sort and uniq.. and added a few quotation marks.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/11/business/11STE M. html?ex=1040706000&en=9beb56832bf1fbe1&ei=5062&par tner=GOOGLE
    This one was posted on Dec 16th.. and appears to be the original article that set these off. Has more info on who is doing it, why, etc.

  4. In this case, she does exist on Should You Trust Website Customer Reviews? · · Score: 1


    Gail is just someone who doesn't have a life.. She's a reporter for the Dallas Star.. Maybe she gets off on Amazon reviews or something.. Or, since she can't write about any real stories, she just makes stuff up for these products.. Longing to be 'someone', but being a top 10 reviewer.

  5. Re:I got the bastard's IP on CERT: Sendmail Distribution Contained Trojan Horse · · Score: 1


    Yah.. Eli wasn't responsible. And likely his box wasn't hacked.. more likely, a user account was compromised.. if at all.

    You mention that you were "slimed".. was your system compromised, or did you just run the infected Build? If it was comrpomised, care to tell us anything you found in the forensics?

    His Ip/hostname was posted to Vulndiscuss earlier today..

  6. Re:Why Mail Shouldn't Run As Root! on CERT: Sendmail Distribution Contained Trojan Horse · · Score: 2, Interesting


    The trojan doesn't work like that, look at the code. It compiles and runs when you run "./Build". It doesn't matter what sendmail runs.

    THe moral of the story is, Check the SIG files.. AND don't configure/compile software as ROOT. At least then it would have only been user level compromise.

  7. The backdoor code on CERT: Sendmail Distribution Contained Trojan Horse · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have made the backdoor'd sendmail code available at http://www.enzotech.net/files/sm.backdoor.patch and the base64 portion is decoded at http://www.enzotech.net/files/sm.backdoor.base64.t xt
    This was diff'd from a previously downloaded tar ball that we were using for analysis of another bug.

  8. yah, snort screws it's developers on Snort Creator Makes Good · · Score: 1

    What I like best, is how Marty stands to profit so much, where others like Dragos who have commited so much time and code to the project, get nothing.

    Yah, marty sure does rule. Even when he's standing behind you while you're bent over an IDS server.

  9. Re:Curious...(was: Re: HFG) on Interview: Grill John Vranesevich of AntiOnline · · Score: 1

    Sure am. Doesn't it seem logical I would follow up on my own posts?

  10. Re:Death by ignorance on Interview: Grill John Vranesevich of AntiOnline · · Score: 1

    If everyone ignored him, he would go away.
    His site wouldn't get hits, he'd be out
    of cash and funding, and poof, he is some stupid
    kid again saying "Wow.. Sucks that thousands
    of people would laugh if I died in a terrible
    plane crash". Everyone already knows he is a fake,
    and nobody gives him credit anyway. He doesn't
    offer any services that will get his site anywhere. THe only things making him money is us
    going to his site.

  11. Re:HFG on Interview: Grill John Vranesevich of AntiOnline · · Score: 1

    Here are a couple of definitions I feel I'd
    like to share:

    > Assumption \As*sump"tion\ (?; 215), n. [OE. assumpcioun a taking
    > up into heaven, L. assumptio a taking, fr. assumere: cf. F.
    > assomption. See {Assume}.]
    > 1. The act of assuming, or taking to or upon one's self; the
    > act of taking up or adopting.
    > The assumption of authority. --Whewell.


    And> Accusation \Ac`cu*sa"tion\, n. [OF. acusation, F. accusation, L.
    > accusatio, fr. accusare. See {Accuse}.]
    > 1. The act of accusing or charging with a crime or with a
    > lighter offense.


  12. HFG on Interview: Grill John Vranesevich of AntiOnline · · Score: 1

    Here is a valid question:

    After the statute of limitations is over for
    the HFG hacks, will you finally admit to being
    HFG?

    Also, once the statute of limitations is over
    for the sites you paid people to hack, will you
    admit to those? Is this your companies life long
    plan, is to sit being poor for 8 years, and then
    make these announcements in the mid 200x era,
    and then get a ton of hits from those
    announcements? That is a BRILLIANT plan. Wow,
    you are far more intelligent than I had thought!

    Also, what exactly do you have to say about
    your interferance with packet storm? Did
    you find them to be a big competition with
    you, so you figured you would cry and moan
    and threaten until they were shut down?

    What do you plan to do when a company
    with money gets sick of your girlish
    whining and pissing, and sinks you
    like Jimmy Hoffa?

    Could you please reply to every single thing
    that attrition.org says on their dedicated
    section to you, and try to prove them wrong?
    (with as little lying as possible if you could).

  13. Re:AntiOnline (new AO slogan) on Interview: Grill John Vranesevich of AntiOnline · · Score: 1

    "We do for the web, what tabloids do for
    the super market check out lane"

  14. Re:You = Moron on Interview: Grill John Vranesevich of AntiOnline · · Score: 1

    Nobody has been reading slashdot for very long,
    it is a young site. I have known of it for
    quite sometime, but never really read much
    on it except for the past year or so. SO don't
    even try and assume things, you are very bad at
    it. I think it would have been in their best
    interest to have NOT posted it. There are
    intelligent people who read slashdot, but the
    facts of the world are, there are more stupid
    people out there than we know what to do with.
    They will follow some idiots to the end of the world. If JP gains one single friend from slashdot
    posting this, then it was a tragedy. I'm more
    so familiar with JP then the majority of people.
    I have worked with Attrition, and HNN on stories
    and news about JP, and I was the one who featured
    him on netcriminals.org and past out fliers at
    defcon about him and how to shun him. Never once
    giving the domain name for people to surf his web site, and click on his little banners, and add
    to his statistics, so his so called funding companies can see that the site is doing so well.
    Hell, if you really want to, go ahead and look at
    the site, notice how anything that doens't run from a cron job, hasn't been modified since mid last week, and most of his sections haven't been touched for over a month, unless updated with a cron. Nobody is answering the phones there, it is a waste of time. Better to 100% forget. The media
    makes everything now a days, the media spreads the word. If the media had never mentioned slashdot.org even one time, it certainly wouldn't
    be as popular as it is today. Granted, the site
    gets a lot of hits,a nd a lot of people found them
    from links, but a good majority probably hit this
    site for their first time from links from sites like wired, and other major news sites. ANyway,
    I firmly believe that if you just never mention, don't speak and forget about a site, it will die.
    Check out JP's stats tommorow, I bet they sky rocketed today.