Nothing to see here, folks, nevermind the man behind the curtain...
That's right, there isn't. So says the year+ long investigation.
Mr. Horowitz repeatedly said he found no evidence that the F.B.I. rigged the outcome. “Our review did not find documentary or testimonial evidence directly connecting the political views these employees expressed in their text messages and instant messages to the specific investigative decisions we reviewed,” the report said.
Of course, this doesn't fit your narrative. Lock her up right? That's what you were told to think.
And this is exactly why I'm grateful I decided to switch to Google's Project Fi. None of this fake bullshit "unlimited"
Right from the Fi pricing site:
After 6 GB, data is free! Enjoy the same high-speed connectivity for up to 15 GB of data use. You can opt out of slower speeds by paying for $10/GB any individual data used above 15 GB in a billing cycle. Learn more here.
So EXACTLY the same bullshit, except a lower threshold at which they start throttling you, OR they actually start charging you by the GB. Explain how this is better?
Dude this isn't about beliefs, it's about your inability to make a coherent argument. FTR I don't disagree with your points.
If you think today's admin is doing X, just say it and provide some temporally relevant evidence. But saying the admin of 50+ years ago did it, and expecting people to take that as evidence that it's going on today? I mean, maybe there is some link between Nixon's admin and Trump's, but it isn't well known for sure and expecting the reader to make that leap is ridiculous.
Our drug policy is how we enforce racial segregation.... This isn't me making crap up either. Nixon's old aids admitted to it.
It's like if I said, "Our society is racist, George Washington admitted to having slaves." Does you the latter part of that sentence support the first?
I can't convert you, you're too far gone. What I can do is keep your kind from doing any more harm.
As a side, overreacting like a nutjob to anyone that criticizes you doesn't help you win over the reader.
That dollar in your pocket is worth a few percent less today than it was last year and has probably lost about 90% of it's value since your grand parents were the age you are now
Yes, I learned about inflation when I was 7 years old, thanks. Obviously that's not the same as losing 20% of it's value in a day.
but their successors are. That's blindingly obvious enough I really shouldn't have to point it out...
But really, telling people they are retards when they don't agree with you, how's that working? Educating a lot of folks? Changing peoples' minds much? Converting people to your way of thinking?
We're told by many here on/. that music HAS no intrinsic value because it CAN be copied.
Unfortunately (or not, depending on your outlook) that's very true. People today aren't paying for the music, they are paying for the service that make it available to them; the slick app that manages the music on their PC or mobile devices, the data center that provides fast downloads and streaming of the music, the licensing deals with publishers that provide acccess to a large catalog from a single subscription, and so on.
So you don't care if the country will be doing well after Trump's term, you don't care who it is on the ticket, as long as it is not Trump?
If the country is doing well it'll be in spite of him not because of him. The US was doing fine before him and it'll do fine without him. It'll be something that Pence or whoever can easily carry on, without the moronic antics on Twitter, without installing their retard children into positions of power where they don't belong, without dismantling our institutions, without the kowtowing to Russia, etc. etc. etc.
what is it in Trump that creates such a reaction in you
Gee let's see if I can think of anything. Oh I can't. He's just a peach of a human and I can't do anything but love and want to be just like him.
Apparently La Liga believes everyone's smartphone is theirs to do with as they please. Are they really any better than the people who violate their copyrights?
So... as long as someone else is doing something bad, in your subjective opinion, it justifies whatever bad, self-serving behavior of your own?
the idea that every single person who watched or listened WOULD have paid, and COULD have, had "piracy" not been an option is absurd
You're right it is. But a non-zero number would have paid for it.
The legalistic interpretation that leaves no room for anything but market forces and uses political power and state violence to enforce rules that benefit them is not really something I can cheer for.
When someone expends vast amounts of money to develop a product, who do you think it should benefit? You?
Main Stream Moron's didn't even bat 1 word about it and even when bashing Cambridge over the matter they would gloss over fact Obama did it 4 years before like it never happened
Maybe you should ask yourself why your party leaders didn't expose these terrible injustices of the Obama camp? Why do you vote for these people that let these terrible crimes go completely unmentioned? They were pounding H for her email server but they couldn't even MENTION these awful, heinous crimes committed by Obama? Weird isn't it?
Maybe you should ask why, now that your cronies own all 3 houses of government, there STILL isn't any investigation into Obama's terrible crimes? Explain please. Is it that even that you own all 3 houses of government, it's the Stonemasons, or the Knights Templar that are REALLY controlling the government and are blocking any prosecution of Obama's crimes?
This always seemed like the way things always should be
There of course lenders that ask few questions. They are called loan sharks. You are free to make use of them if you think they offer a better, safe transaction than your credit card.
It shouldn't matter what you spend that credit on.
Yet it does, contrary to your opinion of how the lending industry should be run. Loans always have conditions. If you don't believe me, go take out a mortgage loan and try to buy a new car with the money.
Sure, but how is buying Bitcoin worse than buying commemorative crap on the Home Shopping Channel?
It's pure statistics. WF's numbers show that people who buy bitcoin on their cards are more likely to go into default. Buying crap on HSN is not "better" or "worse", it's just statistically less likely to correlate with WF losing money on the purchase.
So the trump administration is going to be the first administration in the past few decades to negotiate de-nuclearization in North Korea without a senior White House science advisor
You do realize that nothing at all has been accomplished, right? No meeting. No deals. No agreements. Nothing.
Oh wait. Trump did call Kim childish names like "rocket boy" on Twitter. It's hilarious, until you realize that burning to death in a nuclear fire isn't fun.
Yes, what changed? Today we are talking about nuclear warheads hitting the coast of CA. 3 years ago you hardly heard anything about NK other than that Kim is over there being crazy doing crazy guy stuff.
Progress.
It's a lot easier to say you will stop testing weapons when you have no place to test them.
Good thing NK only has one mountain in the entire country.
Yes, for the same reason Macron gave him a military parade, and Netanyahu put together a power point presentation for him fit for a 6 year old. The world knows America has an overgrown child as president. S. Korean and others still have things to gain from America, and they know stroking Trumps's ego is the way to get it.
but it would not have happened (because it DID NOT HAPPEN) without Trump
Soooo. What's happened again? Fill me in on what progress has been made.
Sorry to point this out sparky, but the Bush administration never claimed Iraq had anything to do with 9-11. They claimed it was supporting terrorism.
You're right. They just claimed Iraq supported and armed terrorists, and left it to the public to draw the big fat line between Iraq and the terrorists that bombed the trade towers.
The U.S. stated that the intent was to remove "a regime that developed and used weapons of mass destruction, that harbored and supported terrorists, committed outrageous human rights abuses, and defied the just demands of the United Nations and the world.
Slashdot Mirror
Nothing to see here, folks, nevermind the man behind the curtain...
That's right, there isn't. So says the year+ long investigation.
Mr. Horowitz repeatedly said he found no evidence that the F.B.I. rigged the outcome. “Our review did not find documentary or testimonial evidence directly connecting the political views these employees expressed in their text messages and instant messages to the specific investigative decisions we reviewed,” the report said.
Of course, this doesn't fit your narrative. Lock her up right? That's what you were told to think.
And this is exactly why I'm grateful I decided to switch to Google's Project Fi. None of this fake bullshit "unlimited"
Right from the Fi pricing site:
After 6 GB, data is free! Enjoy the same high-speed connectivity for up to 15 GB of data use.
You can opt out of slower speeds by paying for $10/GB any individual data used above 15 GB in a billing cycle. Learn more here.
So EXACTLY the same bullshit, except a lower threshold at which they start throttling you, OR they actually start charging you by the GB. Explain how this is better?
Wow, you completely invalidated my point. Whoosh?
There's probably no converting you.
Dude this isn't about beliefs, it's about your inability to make a coherent argument. FTR I don't disagree with your points.
If you think today's admin is doing X, just say it and provide some temporally relevant evidence. But saying the admin of 50+ years ago did it, and expecting people to take that as evidence that it's going on today? I mean, maybe there is some link between Nixon's admin and Trump's, but it isn't well known for sure and expecting the reader to make that leap is ridiculous.
Our drug policy is how we enforce racial segregation .... This isn't me making crap up either. Nixon's old aids admitted to it.
It's like if I said, "Our society is racist, George Washington admitted to having slaves." Does you the latter part of that sentence support the first?
I can't convert you, you're too far gone. What I can do is keep your kind from doing any more harm.
As a side, overreacting like a nutjob to anyone that criticizes you doesn't help you win over the reader.
That dollar in your pocket is worth a few percent less today than it was last year and has probably lost about 90% of it's value since your grand parents were the age you are now
Yes, I learned about inflation when I was 7 years old, thanks. Obviously that's not the same as losing 20% of it's value in a day.
but their successors are. That's blindingly obvious enough I really shouldn't have to point it out...
But really, telling people they are retards when they don't agree with you, how's that working? Educating a lot of folks? Changing peoples' minds much? Converting people to your way of thinking?
Paper money is only mildly better, especially now that it has no gold backing.
Um, what? Your BTC lost ~20% of it's value over the last week. The dollar in my pocket pretty much has the same buying power as it did a year ago.
We're told by many here on /. that music HAS no intrinsic value because it CAN be copied.
Unfortunately (or not, depending on your outlook) that's very true. People today aren't paying for the music, they are paying for the service that make it available to them; the slick app that manages the music on their PC or mobile devices, the data center that provides fast downloads and streaming of the music, the licensing deals with publishers that provide acccess to a large catalog from a single subscription, and so on.
Bitcoin has found a real niche and it's not going to collapse to nothing unless another coin fully takes its place.
Yes and it's niche is transactions on the gray or black market where you have no other choice but to use it.
Nixon's old aids admitted to it.
Good thing Nixon's aids aren't running the country right now.
Not to mention I get to pay for their data collection. Nice.
Or, you could unsubscribe and uninstall the app.
So you don't care if the country will be doing well after Trump's term, you don't care who it is on the ticket, as long as it is not Trump?
If the country is doing well it'll be in spite of him not because of him. The US was doing fine before him and it'll do fine without him. It'll be something that Pence or whoever can easily carry on, without the moronic antics on Twitter, without installing their retard children into positions of power where they don't belong, without dismantling our institutions, without the kowtowing to Russia, etc. etc. etc.
what is it in Trump that creates such a reaction in you
Gee let's see if I can think of anything. Oh I can't. He's just a peach of a human and I can't do anything but love and want to be just like him.
Apparently La Liga believes everyone's smartphone is theirs to do with as they please. Are they really any better than the people who violate their copyrights?
So... as long as someone else is doing something bad, in your subjective opinion, it justifies whatever bad, self-serving behavior of your own?
What's that even mean?!
the idea that every single person who watched or listened WOULD have paid, and COULD have, had "piracy" not been an option is absurd
You're right it is. But a non-zero number would have paid for it.
The legalistic interpretation that leaves no room for anything but market forces and uses political power and state violence to enforce rules that benefit them is not really something I can cheer for.
When someone expends vast amounts of money to develop a product, who do you think it should benefit? You?
Right up to the moment you realize that as much as 30% of the apps there are not properly vetted
And 70% of the apps have been vetted. Sounds safer to me.
Main Stream Moron's didn't even bat 1 word about it and even when bashing Cambridge over the matter they would gloss over fact Obama did it 4 years before like it never happened
Maybe you should ask yourself why your party leaders didn't expose these terrible injustices of the Obama camp? Why do you vote for these people that let these terrible crimes go completely unmentioned? They were pounding H for her email server but they couldn't even MENTION these awful, heinous crimes committed by Obama? Weird isn't it?
Maybe you should ask why, now that your cronies own all 3 houses of government, there STILL isn't any investigation into Obama's terrible crimes? Explain please. Is it that even that you own all 3 houses of government, it's the Stonemasons, or the Knights Templar that are REALLY controlling the government and are blocking any prosecution of Obama's crimes?
This always seemed like the way things always should be
There of course lenders that ask few questions. They are called loan sharks. You are free to make use of them if you think they offer a better, safe transaction than your credit card.
It shouldn't matter what you spend that credit on.
Yet it does, contrary to your opinion of how the lending industry should be run. Loans always have conditions. If you don't believe me, go take out a mortgage loan and try to buy a new car with the money.
Sure, but how is buying Bitcoin worse than buying commemorative crap on the Home Shopping Channel?
It's pure statistics. WF's numbers show that people who buy bitcoin on their cards are more likely to go into default. Buying crap on HSN is not "better" or "worse", it's just statistically less likely to correlate with WF losing money on the purchase.
So the trump administration is going to be the first administration in the past few decades to negotiate de-nuclearization in North Korea without a senior White House science advisor
You do realize that nothing at all has been accomplished, right? No meeting. No deals. No agreements. Nothing.
Oh wait. Trump did call Kim childish names like "rocket boy" on Twitter. It's hilarious, until you realize that burning to death in a nuclear fire isn't fun.
Trump is one variable that changed
Yes, what changed? Today we are talking about nuclear warheads hitting the coast of CA. 3 years ago you hardly heard anything about NK other than that Kim is over there being crazy doing crazy guy stuff.
Progress.
It's a lot easier to say you will stop testing weapons when you have no place to test them.
Good thing NK only has one mountain in the entire country.
Of course they do but South Korea credits Trump
Yes, for the same reason Macron gave him a military parade, and Netanyahu put together a power point presentation for him fit for a 6 year old. The world knows America has an overgrown child as president. S. Korean and others still have things to gain from America, and they know stroking Trumps's ego is the way to get it.
but it would not have happened (because it DID NOT HAPPEN) without Trump
Soooo. What's happened again? Fill me in on what progress has been made.
Sorry to point this out sparky, but the Bush administration never claimed Iraq had anything to do with 9-11. They claimed it was supporting terrorism.
You're right. They just claimed Iraq supported and armed terrorists, and left it to the public to draw the big fat line between Iraq and the terrorists that bombed the trade towers.
The U.S. stated that the intent was to remove "a regime that developed and used weapons of mass destruction, that harbored and supported terrorists, committed outrageous human rights abuses, and defied the just demands of the United Nations and the world.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
One last point - the very LAST person you want to bring to a nuclear disarmament party is a nuclear weapons expert
You take the gay wedding cake for #1 retarded post in this thread.