Slashdot Mirror


Verizon's New Phone Plan Proves It Has No Idea What 'Unlimited' Actually Means (gizmodo.com)

Verizon has unveiled its third "unlimited" smartphone plan that goes to show just how meaningless the term has become in the U.S. wireless industry. "In addition to its Go Unlimited and Beyond Unlimited plans, Verizon is now adding a premium Above Unlimited plan to the mix, which offers 75GB of 'unlimited' data per month (as opposed to the 22GB of 'unlimited' data you get on less expensive plans), along with 20GB of 'unlimited' data when using your phone as a hotspot, 500GB of Verizon cloud storage, and five monthly international Travel Passes, which are daily vouchers that let you use your phone's wireless service abroad the same as if you were in the U.S.," reports Gizmodo. Are you confused yet? From the report: And as if that wasn't bad enough, Verizon has also updated its convoluted sliding pricing scheme that adjusts based on how many phones are on a single bill. For families with four lines of service, the Above Unlimited cost $60 per person, but if you're a single user the same service costs $95, which really seems like bullshit because if everything is supposed to be unlimited, it shouldn't really make a difference how many people are on the same bill. As a small concession to flexibility, Verizon says families with multiple lines can now mix and match plans instead of having to choose a single plan for every line, which should allow families to choose the right service for an individual person's needs and help keep costs down. The new Above Unlimited plan and the company's mix-and-match feature arrives next week on June 18th.

171 comments

  1. news at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unlimited data doesn't mean unlimited data

    1. Re:news at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does mean unlimited data. There's still no limit on how much data you're allowed to consume before they charge you more. Their stupid marketing department however is going to get themselves sued by contributing to the confusion you're demonstrating.

    2. Re: news at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is artificially limiting the rate not a limit?

    3. Re:news at 11 by Q-Hack! · · Score: 2

      I guess there are not very many of us left who still have the original (grandfathered) Unlimited plan that doesn't have any data caps.

      --
      Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
    4. Re: news at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. What if electric utilities sold their services the same way?

    5. Re: news at 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when they send a $70 bill, send a $10 check marked "unlimited payment".

  2. I had no idea ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had no idea that UNLIMITED could be so...well...limiting!

    1. Re:I had no idea ... by lgw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I had no idea that UNLIMITED could be so...well...limiting!

      Back in the days of dial-up, "unlimited" meant "unlimited minutes of being connected", as there were places like Compuserve that would charge you $2/minute or something just to connect to their service. So back when small ISPs were still a thing, "unlimited" was clear to all as "unlimited minutes", which with dial-up was, amusingly, about the same amount of monthly data as today's "unlimited" plans.

      Obviously the commonly-understood meaning of "unlimited" for data plans had changed, but there's no talking reason to marketroids.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:I had no idea ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and it would be different rates per minute based on the speed you connected at (1200, 2400, 9600, 14.4K, 28.8K, 33.6K, 56K, etc)

    3. Re:I had no idea ... by hey! · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In business, "commodity" is a dirty word. Nobody wants to be in a commodity business, because it's really, really hard to compete in a commodity business because there's only one number that matters to the consumer: price. If your customers see the commodity you're selling for a penny less, they're not your customers anymore.

      Telecommunication bandwith is a commodity. Access to a MB/s is the same (except for perhaps minor differences in latency), so it should be the easiest thing in the world for consumers to buy. Consequently telecom vendors want to make pricing as confusing as possible. This is coming to ISP service too, with the end of net neutrality. Comcast and Verizon will make it impossible to tell whether Xfinity or Fios is a better deal.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    4. Re:I had no idea ... by Teun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the USofA had English as official language you'd have a chance of suing them, but alas, without legal standing for English the word unlimited is just a random collection of letters.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    5. Re:I had no idea ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comcast and Verizon will make it impossible to tell whether Xfinity or Fios is a better deal.

      Oh that's pretty easy. As I told the FIOS guy when I dropped TV, cut the cord, & returned my set top boxes: "I need to get a receipt for this hardware. I'm sorry, but you see I used to use Comcast, and, well, when I canceled Comcast & switched to FIOS, and tried to return my Comcast hardware, and ..." And that Verizon guy just laughed and laughed. Eventually he recovered enough to give me my receipt.

      FIOS or Xfinity? It's an easy choice!

      As for the TV? That's like an extra $150 a month with "premium" channels & set top boxes & all the other fees. And you need "premium" 'cause everything else is reality TV or home shopping. Lets see here: 30 days per month. $4-$5 DVDs at walmart/target/everywhere. You do the math.

    6. Re:I had no idea ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The term "unlimited" means that there aren't any additional charges for exceeding a data use threshold. I'd really like to see suggestions for a better term, if "unlimited" is a bad choice.

      As I see it, there are three options for data plans:
      1) Flat rate for data, limited only by the equipment, network congestion, and the amount of bandwidth available from the provider's allocation of frequencies
      2) Flat rate for data, limited by throttling after exceeding a data use threshold, plus the aforementioned technical limitations
      3) A metered data plan

      There's nothing inherently unfair about any of the above options, though #3 shouldn't meet anyone's definition of unlimited. We can debate about whether #1 and #2 can be considered unlimited. I don't think throttling is inherently a bad thing, considering that the radio spectrum provides inherent limits on the total amount of bandwidth to be shared between all users. I don't think a metered data plan is inherently bad, either, except that the overage charges are typically billed at a ridiculous rate like $10/GB. My other issue with metered plans is that I don't want to pay more money just because some app decides to upload tracking information or mine cryptocurrency in the background.

      Throttling that deprioritizes heavy data users during times of congestion is reasonable, provided the throttling isn't too severe. It's less reasonable to throttle heavy data users regardless of the network congestion at the time. There's no good reason to throttle heavy users at times when the bandwidth is otherwise mostly unused.

      So, I ask, can options #1 and #2 reasonably be considered unlimited? If not, what is the appropriate term for them? Flat rate data with no overage charges? Is that less confusing than calling the plan unlimited with throttling?

    7. Re:I had no idea ... by Raenex · · Score: 0

      Telecommunication bandwith is a commodity.

      Mostly true, but building out infrastructure is a very high barrier to entry. Also, depending where you are, quality of service can differ greatly between carriers.

      This is coming to ISP service too, with the end of net neutrality. Comcast and Verizon will make it impossible to tell whether Xfinity or Fios is a better deal.

      What does net neutrality have to do with that? By the way, net neutrality was introduced by Obama rather late in the game (2015). So whatever it is that you imagined the ISPs doing, they could have done it before.

    8. Re:I had no idea ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in my corner of the world it didn't.
      Unlimited meant that when you reached your limit, you were slowed down. The ISP would still serve data and you could still use the internet, and were not charged for the additional data used. I remember ISPs used to charge really high prices ($'s per megabyte when the limit was in gigabytes). I'm sure some still do, especially on higher tiers, but I haven't looked into plans for a while. "Unlimited" plans typically replaced ones that charged because no one wanted liked getting unexpected large bills nor watching the meter. I saw no plan that charged for going over the limit was marketed as unlimited. Broadband (ADSL) was sold as an "always-on" connection in my country - the marketing of "unlimited" came in much later.
      At least, this is how I believe it works in Australia. Your marketing rules and history may be different.

    9. Re:I had no idea ... by hey! · · Score: 2

      Without net neutrality you'll be buying packages of content and bandwith -- it'll be just like the old cable TV industry.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:I had no idea ... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Except that didn't happen in the decade and more before net neutrality came into play. The idea that ISPs will be able to turn the Internet into cable TV is absurd. You would quickly lose your customers.

    11. Re:I had no idea ... by hey! · · Score: 1

      People didn't stream isochronous data in 2004.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    12. Re:I had no idea ... by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you mean by that. Perhaps you could put it in layman's terms. If you mean something as simple as watching a video in realtime, YouTube came out in 2005.

    13. Re:I had no idea ... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Dude, we had video webcam chats back in 1998. We were streaming multiple isochronous streams back then (Yahoo! Chat, anyone? Paltalk? Camfrog later on in 2003?)

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    14. Re: I had no idea ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People were not cutting the cord back then. There was no monitary motivation to do so, and its absurd to compare these times with those. Many of us in the industry, recognizeda problem and pushed for a solution. Net neutrality is needed, and we need privacy laws even more.

    15. Re:I had no idea ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My other issue with metered plans is that I don't want to pay more money just because some app decides to upload tracking information or mine cryptocurrency in the background.

      That at least holds for the possibility of being controlled by you. My problem is, if I really hate you and I know your IP, what is to stop me from artificially driving up your bill by sending you a bunch of data that you never actually requested?

      And I certainly have no problems with #1 being called unlimited. "Not artificially limited" is how I always viewed it.

    16. Re: I had no idea ... by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      Net neutrality is a buzz word, it means different things to different people. It's like 'middle class'. Meaningless as a designation because people on the right and people on the left mean different things.

      Let's talk about the real problem. Pipe owners should not be allowed to own content creators. We use to not allow movie companies to own movie theaters. (I don't know if that still true.) We shouldn't allow ISP's to own content creation companies, but we do. Likewise about wireless companies. they should not be allowed to own content creation companies. Moreover exclusive contracts in this space should not be permitted.

      Absolutely this kind of thing should not be the province of an executive body that flips parties with the occupant of the White House. It should be determined through the legislature through legislation.

      That won't happen because our government is broken. It is broken because of the Democrats and Republicans. And they have no incentive to fix it.

  3. Never been throttled by jordan314 · · Score: 1

    FWIW, I have verizon unlimited and constantly go over 22 GB and don't think I've ever been throttled. I think it depends on how clogged the network is, 22GB is guaranteed.

    1. Re:Never been throttled by Pascoea · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have verizon unlimited and constantly go over 22 GB and don't think I've ever been throttled.

      Maybe they have a peering agreement with PornHub?

    2. Re: Never been throttled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Automated Response: You have been trolled. Please get smarter before trying to use the internet again. Thank you.

    3. Re:Never been throttled by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      You're thinking a different kind of "throttled"

  4. Well... by willoughby · · Score: 2

    According to folks who know a lot more about math than I, there are numbers greater than infinity. So maybe "unlimited" is simply a concept instead of an absolute . We need a Richard Feynman type to explain this to laymen. Or, at least, explain it to me.

    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So maybe "unlimited" is simply a concept instead of an absolute

      "Unlimited" is meaningless in marketing terminology.

      The net neutrality laws from 2015 are what required network providers to provide actual numbers on how much bandwidth they provide, under what terms, as well as the price.
      As of a week ago, all of the laws requiring network providers marketing to contain truthful information are no longer on the books.

      75GB can mean anything, including "zero".
      $95/month can also mean anything, including hundreds of times that amount and repeated over any unit of time they wish.

      It's currently not illegal for the above package to bill you thousands of dollars per month for exceeding 1KB of data transfer.

      And no I'm not kidding or exaggerating.
      (PDF warning): http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2017/db1122/DOC-347927A1.pdf

      Jump to page 120 in the PDF (page 119 in the document)
      This used to be the law, and now is not:

      In the Title II Order, the Commission broadened the transparency rule's requirements by interpreting the rule to mandate certain additional reporting obligations it termed "enhancements." These additional reporting obligations, although falling within the same broad categories as those listed in the Open Internet Order, required that providers include far greater technical detail in their disclosures. For example, all ISPs, except small providers exempt under the Small Provider Waiver Order, were required to make specific disclosures regarding the commercial terms (including specific information regarding prices and fees), performance characteristics (including, for example, packet loss and a requirement that these disclosures be reasonably related to the performance a consumer could expect in the geographic area in which they are purchasing service), and network practices (including, for example, application and user-based practices) of the broadband Internet access services they offer.

    2. Re: Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody knows that infinity is exactly 7+1 as in 8

    3. Re:Well... by hispeedzintarwebz · · Score: 2

      Magnets - how do they work?

    4. Re:Well... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      So how do those relate to alephs? And what do you feel about the continuum hypothesis?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    5. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump will be spending an infinite time in history's prison, a traitor. I hope that helps you understand your reality better Impy.

    6. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to folks who know a lot more about math than I, there are numbers greater than infinity.

      Infinity isn't a number, it's an idea. It's a fancy way of saying "a lot".

    7. Re:Well... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > As a folk who knows a lot more about math than you,

      *facepalm*

      Any number divided by zero is UNDEFINED or in IEEE754 notation NaN (Not-a-Number)

      Why?

      Because if you graph:

      * 0/negative x towards zero it goes toward -Infinity
      * 0/positive x towards zero it goes toward +Infinity

      The problem is that 0/0 is BOTH positive AND negative infinity. Which one is correct?

      In Mathematics this is called a Singularity. Division is supposed to be closed, meaning a single number divided by another singlenumber produces a SINGLE number -- not TWO of them! Since it is impossible to tell which Infinity is correct: a) both, b) neither, c) positive, d) negative along with the fact that we haven't invented multi-valued variables, Mathematicians leave the division by zero as undefined by definition.

      Where the fuck you are are getting this C/0 = Inf + (C-1) horseshit from???

    8. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      >The net neutrality laws from 2015 are what required network providers to provide actual numbers on how much bandwidth they provide, under what terms, as well as the price.

      Nah. This has nothing to do with numbers, and has everything to with marketing, which is under the regulatory purview of the FTC. The FTC has launched lawsuits over the "unlimited" marketing claims It sued T-Mobile in 2010 for "unlimited" claims and won. Tracfone was sued and required to pay 40 mil in 2015. AT&T was sued in 2014 and but the FCC not made a power grab for net neutrality in 2015 and reclassified broadband and wireless data with common carrier status, the FTC was no longer about to do anything about it.

      Right now, with net neutrality dead, the FTC has an appeal to the 9th circuit to rehear the case against AT&T whose position is now weakened because broadband and wireless are not common carrier anymore. If AT&T loses, then Verizon will be next.

      https://consumerist.com/2016/10/17/if-ftc-cant-resurrect-lawsuit-over-atts-unlimited-data-telecoms-may-be-even-more-untouchable/

      Since the FTC wasn’t suing about the fairness or legality of the throttling practice itself, and only concerned itself with AT&T’s alleged failure to clearly disclose its throttling policy to customers, the judge determined there was no regulatory overlap.

      But as this was happening, the FCC successfully enacted new “net neutrality” rules. In order to make those rules stick, the Commission had to reclassify broadband and wireless data as a common carrier. Even so, said the lower court, the FTC’s lawsuit was about deceptive marketing, not telephone service.

      Even though AT&T was the marquee plaintiff in the lawsuit that sought to overturn the FCC’s rules, it gladly accepted its common carrier status when it appealed the ruling in the FTC case — and this time it was more successful.

    9. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be some of that new maths they are teaching.

    10. Re:Well... by kriston · · Score: 1

      The way I've understood this policy is that they use the term "unlimited" to mean that you have an unlimited data allowance but you are throttled when you pass a threshold. This is exactly what AT&T does. Verizon is letting you pay more for a higher threshold.

      Consumers have to face it. There will always be a limited amount of bandwidth available. For example, you can't have each of the cars on a busy highway get individualized, personal audio streams simultaneously.

      --

      Kriston

    11. Re:Well... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "For example, you can't have each of the cars on a busy highway get individualized, personal audio streams simultaneously."

      Do you even know what an MP3 player does? It's a purpose device that allows you a personalized, individualized audio stream. Many of them work with cars, some just require a simple adapter.

      Now, if all of them needed to use an FM transmitter, you might have a point. But bluetooth? Fuck no, you could have every car on the road loaded with BT and as long as they followed power limits there should be pretty much no issues. Well, excepting the fact BT audio sounds like garbage.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    12. Re:Well... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Where the fuck you are are getting this C/0 = Inf + (C-1) horseshit from???

      Core Maths.

    13. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... that's not a stream. That's carrying your supply around with you.

      Getting an individualized personal audio stream means each car downloading audio from somewhere else.

      Sure, you could carry around a subset of "everything" on your MP3 player so you can have what you want if you properly plan it out in advance, but that isn't the same thing and that isn't was he was talking about.

    14. Re:Well... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      "no fraction left behind"

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    15. Re:Well... by kriston · · Score: 1

      Hahah, wow, you completely missed my point. I cannot understand where you got this interpretation.

      I am specifically talking about the wireless data connection to mobile devices from the mobile phone towers.

      What I'm talking about has absolutely nothing to do with MP3 players, FM transmitters, BlueTooth. I am talking about wireless data networks from mobile providers like AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, and Sprint.

      --

      Kriston

    16. Re:Well... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Infinity is a concept not a number.

      A better way to think about it is using sets. For example, how large is the set of even numbers? The answer is that it's infinitely large, because you can start with a set with just the number 2 in it, and expand it forever by adding 2 to the largest value in the set to get another number that belongs in the set. Likewise, the same is true for the set of odd numbers, it is also infinitely large. So how large is the set that contains all the even numbers and 7? It's clearly larger than the set of just even numbers, and we even know how much larger it is as it contains exactly one more number in it. But the answer is that it's still infinitely large, not infinitely plus one. Likewise, the set of all even and odd numbers is also infinitely large and not infinitely times two, and so on.

    17. Re:Well... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Come on, this is simple bistromathics. They curve around and meet. Sheesh.

    18. Re:Well... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "each car downloading audio from somewhere else."

      Do you not know how bluetooth works? Or networking in general?

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    19. Re:Well... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "I cannot understand where you got this interpretation."

      It's called the Americanized version of the English language. If you don't understand it, don't use it.

      You stated, without ANY EXCEPTION OR FOLLOW-UP QUALIFIER, "There will always be a limited amount of bandwidth available. For example, you can't have each of the cars on a busy highway get individualized, personal audio streams simultaneously."

      That leaves open a whole fucking goddamned slew of counter-points. See, I have essentially unlimited bandwidth, because the only thing on this planet capable of giving me a personalized, individualized music experience, is my MP3 play/phone. When I plug in that wire to the aux-in jack on my receiver, no bandwidth problem.

      YOU think there's a bandwidth problem. YOU are not smart enough to work around it by any various means available to do so.

      The problem here lies with you, not me. Try again when you can think more than two steps ahead.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    20. Re: Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled "Clinton" again I see. You really ought to get educated.

    21. Re:Well... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      LOL +1 for Douglas Adams reference.

    22. Re:Well... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      TY! It was so obvious I was surprised nobody had beat me to it.

    23. Re:Well... by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      Consumers have to face it. There will always be a limited amount of bandwidth available. For example, you can't have each of the cars on a busy highway get individualized, personal audio streams simultaneously.

      Then force them to stop using the term 'unlimited'. It is false advertising. I can't say I'm selling you an 'unlimited' buffet if I'm not. I can't say I'm selling you an 'unlimited' amount of gas if I'm not. Why should wireless companies be exempt from fraud and false advertising? If it's not 'unlimited' don't say it. if you say it you should be legally required to adhere to your advertising.

    24. Re:Well... by kriston · · Score: 1

      I don't get why people don't understand what I wrote.

      At least people here are better than Reddit.

      --

      Kriston

    25. Re:Well... by kriston · · Score: 1

      Wow. Completely missed my point. I'm talking about broadcasting from mobile phone towers to devices in cars. This has nothing to do with BlueTooth or MP3 players.

      --

      Kriston

    26. Re:Well... by kriston · · Score: 1

      Wow. Completely missed my point. I'm talking about broadcasting from mobile phone towers to devices in cars. This has nothing to do with BlueTooth or MP3 players.

      Consider re-reading the post again. I won't be responding any more to this kind of trolling.

      I hope you're trolling.

      --

      Kriston

  5. Cashed my unlimited VZ in years ago by OffTheLip · · Score: 1

    It was clear then Verizon had no intention of honoring it so I switched to a set data plan. While dumping Verizon was an option I have family members who think it's a "must have". We'll see about that...

  6. They know exactly what it means by known_coward_69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and they are wording it to exclude the few people who want to use their smartphone as their home internet or have some continuous download on it 24x7 cause they want to feel special at using a lot of data

    1. Re:They know exactly what it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry. How is it again, that people should be paying for internet twice as a standard? What exactly makes that the way to go, exactly? People like you are what's wrong with the world. Straight the fuck up. When you die, the world will be a better place.

    2. Re:They know exactly what it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wah.

    3. Re:They know exactly what it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this clearly is talking about Net Neutrality. Unlimited in this sense is 'you can go where you want unthrottled ... for now'. I'm sure that gradually the lower-tier plans will drop the 'unlimited', and start throttling users that are viewing content deemed unacceptable. Which is, of course, content not provided by them. This will save them boatloads on peering agreements, unless that foreign content provider wants to pay for a fast lane. Verizon and AT&T will make record profits very soon. As for the pure content providers - I'm sure none of those costs of this will filter down to consumer.

    4. Re:They know exactly what it means by known_coward_69 · · Score: 1

      no one is forcing you to buy internet twice. you don't even have to use a cell phone if you don't want to.

    5. Re:They know exactly what it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't afford the Internet twice, you're not a big baller!

    6. Re:They know exactly what it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then they shouldn't call it "unlimited". Because, well, there's a limit.

      It's like a nutrition company saying I'm going to live "forever" if I buy their product, then in small print saying maybe 100 years if I'm lucky.

      Or calling a non-self driving car that you aren't supposed to take your hands off the wheel "autopilot".

      In the era of lies, I'm not surprised at all the deception.

    7. Re:They know exactly what it means by mjwx · · Score: 1

      and they are wording it to exclude the few people who want to use their smartphone as their home internet or have some continuous download on it 24x7 cause they want to feel special at using a lot of data

      And this kind of deceptive advertising is why I'm glad I live in a country that penalises this kind of deceptive advertising. I have unlimited fibre broadband at home and unlimited means it's not metred at all. You'll find it hard to get an "unlimited" mobile phone plan here (although it's pretty good value for money, £6 a month for 1.5 GB of data... plus some minutes and texts I just don't use).

      If a UK company wants to use the word "unlimited" in advertising, the service they provide must be sans limits.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  7. Its the people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish people would stop buying plans that say there are unlimited but really are limited. It really not hard to figure out that if they list a limit then the plan must be limited in some way. Adding the word unlimited must increase sales. They wouldn't add it if it didn't.

    1. Re:Its the people. by known_coward_69 · · Score: 2

      why would i care if at&t throttles my kids' youtube if they watch too much during the month on cellular? Same for myself, some of us have better things to do than stare into a phone all day long and "stream"

    2. Re:Its the people. by Pascoea · · Score: 2

      I wish people would stop buying plans that say there are unlimited but really are limited.

      Show me a plan that meets the "unlimited in every way" criteria. I'll wait.

    3. Re:Its the people. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Some small network should try a new "Unlimited 1MB plan", charging $0.10 per megabyte.

      When the bill comes and someone calls them, they'll be able to say "our plan specifically said unlimited 1MB, so we're charging you for as many MB as you used, there was no limit on the number of MB you could use. It's unlimited."

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    4. Re:Its the people. by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      My Sprint plan is "unlimited in every way". I'm not going to look online for it because I have had it for a few years and don't know if their current plans are the same.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    5. Re: Its the people. by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      I don't need unlimited. I would prefer a faster pipe than a higher data cap.
      Noone can afford to give everyone 1G/sec for $100/month if you saturate it all the time so it's a game of limiting speed or having caps to stop abuse. My kids and I are on the internet constantly. We use around 300gb per month on our fiber line.
      I think we get 1TB. That is plenty for us.

    6. Re:Its the people. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Yes, your plan is "unlimited"... But it only works in half the areas of Verizon or AT&T, you're on Edge or 3G connectivity for big chunks, and the 4G speeds are insanely low. But you get all the data you can (when you cannect, that is). My company had Sprint, and when I moved to SoCal (Ventura) I convinced them to let me switch to Verizon because, even though it was more expensive, it actually worked. I could get data and phone service everywhere instead of big dead zones or marginal zones like Sprint...

      First things first - be able to at least connect to the network, before complaining about "muh data caps"...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    7. Re: Its the people. by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      Sounds great in a commercial. But in the real world, I see no difference. I can connect everywhere I go. While people on AT&T have no connection even in places I get one. To me, they are all the same. It is just marketing speak. And if you believe what they say on TV, I have a bridge to sell you. Cheap too!

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    8. Re: Its the people. by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      I've not found a place that I go to (all over the US) where I don't get a Verizon signal. However, there are several Sprint (and quite a few T-Mobile) holes in the Ventura/Oxnard/Camarillo area. Maybe it's just where I live - but the first issue with cell phone service and "unlimited" offers is to actually CONNECT to a cell phone network. Saving $40 a month is irrelevant if I can't even connect...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    9. Re: Its the people. by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      One thing that surprised me about Sprint service was the unlimited service and data included international roaming in Canada. I certainly did not expect to have free roaming in a forein country and unlimited data included.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    10. Re:Its the people. by Pascoea · · Score: 1

      In order to guarantee the quality of the network, we ask you to activate a BundleBooster in MijnTele2 or the Tele2 app when using more than 5GB per day . If you do not request an additional bundle booster, your data will be closed for one day and you will no longer be able to use the internet.

      Granted, the "BundleBoosters" appear to be free, so you may have me there. We'll let the Slashdot gods decide if "unlimited, as long as you request a variance each day" is "unlimited in every way" =)

      It's a bit of a stretch, but "roaming" data within the EU is limited to 8GB/month. I forget what it said for non-EU, it was significantly limited, but I'd expect to pay when roaming outside of my country.

  8. Innovation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See! Systematically eliminating all regulation on our corporate overseers is allowing them to innovate like never before. Keep fighting the good fight Ajit Pai!

  9. 60% of the time, it works every time! by Arthur+Dent+'99 · · Score: 1

    75GB of "unlimited" data? Verizon must have gone to the Anchorman School of Marketing!

  10. Project Fi by darkain · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And this is exactly why I'm grateful I decided to switch to Google's Project Fi. None of this fake bullshit "unlimited", plus no international "only some days" restrictions. One shared data pool for the whole family. Once we hit our max, we can keep using data as much as we want, without getting charged more. Plus, no cost other than data sim cards that are data-only (no voice/text) are fucking AMAZING. Just keep adding devices like tablets, old cell phones, laptops, hotspots, whatever. Its all just on one shared data pool, and no fuss, no bullshit.

    1. Re:Project Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but goog is selling you out to the highest bidder. You have no security and no privacy. Enjoy!

    2. Re:Project Fi by farble1670 · · Score: 4, Informative

      And this is exactly why I'm grateful I decided to switch to Google's Project Fi. None of this fake bullshit "unlimited"

      Right from the Fi pricing site:

      After 6 GB, data is free! Enjoy the same high-speed connectivity for up to 15 GB of data use.
      You can opt out of slower speeds by paying for $10/GB any individual data used above 15 GB in a billing cycle. Learn more here.

      So EXACTLY the same bullshit, except a lower threshold at which they start throttling you, OR they actually start charging you by the GB. Explain how this is better?

    3. Re:Project Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Once [you] hit [your] max"? I thought you just said it was unlimited. Why is there a max?

    4. Re:Project Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after 15GB your speed drops to 256kb/s unless you opt to continue paying at $10/GB for the faster speed

    5. Re:Project Fi by taxciter · · Score: 1

      ... Explain how this is better?

      I'm not a heavy (10GB+) data user, and do not automatically recommend Fi to those who are. I find Fi better because I pay for the data I use. If I don't use it, I don't pay for it. And that, to me, is BETTER. Also, my Fi devices work well everywhere I've been in Europe. My only additional charges while outside the US are $0.20/minute for old-fashioned phone calls. And, BTW, fuck Verizon and their abuse of the language. Fuck ALL who redefine words for profit and power.

    6. Re:Project Fi by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      I find Fi better because I pay for the data I use. If I don't use it, I don't pay for it. And that, to me, is BETTER.

      In theory it is. In practice Fi ends up being considerably more expensive that other plans.

      E.g., I have a T-Mobile 5GB + Binge on plan. It's $30 a month. A 5GB plan on Fi is $70 / month, and doesn't benefit from Binge meaning in practice I'd use 2x+ as much data that actually counts against my cap on Fi.

      To be fair that's the old T-mo 5GB plan that's not offered anymore. I priced a 3x family plan at 10GB (2x the data) a month though and it's only like $5 / month more (if I bought 3 lines, which I would).

      I don't like all the nonsense of Binge and which services are supported and which aren't and the so-called unlimited plans and throttling, but I'm not going to pay almost 2x as much a month out of principle. In practice I never exhaust my data plan and never come close to the throttling limits. That's the reality. It works for 99.9% of us, and it's only the dopes tethering their homes to their mobile plan that are complaining about throttling and caps.

    7. Re:Project Fi by taxciter · · Score: 1

      My phone is a $100 second-hand Nexus 6. My average Fi bill is $30.97. I don't stream much, seldom use it as a hot spot, and make few international calls when overseas. So, yes, that is considerably more expensive than other plans. But I don't have access to those plans.

  11. weirdest slashvertisement ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

    1. Re:weirdest slashvertisement ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Slashdot should list the top-tier plans and prices for AT&T, Sprint, Boost, Cricket and whoever else is left.

  12. Post net-neutrality definition change. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am pretty sure they are changing the meaning of unlimited, so they can start charging for emails, web pages and minutes of watching netflix movies.

  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. Different meaning by null+etc. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Unlimited" is the amount of money that Verizon hopes to make from their customers.

    1. Re:Different meaning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose they would like an infinite amount. Let me get a dictionary to see what that means.

  15. my god guys. you are bein skinned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://youtu.be/nZoZLdRnBd8

    i pay about 20â for truly unlimited.
    but i guess the differenve is here in europe we have a law against false marketing. call it unlimited and it better be unlimited..

  16. Corporate Doublespeak by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 2

    Not only does 'logic' mean something totally different to marketing people, they're not even using the same dictionary as everyone else, as we can all clearly see here.

  17. "Prioritization point" by magarity · · Score: 5, Informative

    T-Mo has for quite a while now been a lot more upfront about how the term "unlimited" includes a certain amount being your "prioritization point" after which you get throttled.

    1. Re:"Prioritization point" by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Yep, and that throttling is only if the network requires it for QoS. I share a 55+ line with my mom. $60 FLAT a month for two unlimited lines. Data MAY be throttled after 55GB per line. That seems more than fair.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    2. Re:"Prioritization point" by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      That seems more than fair.

      No, it doesn't - I burn through around 500gb each month, but then there are two teenagers in the house with their own PC's downloading whatever they feel like.
      Our ISP will throttle the top 10% of users, and using 500gb doesn't get me into the top 10%, I have never been throttled.
      I always used to be envious of the internet in the US compared to where I am, but it looks like my shit hole third world countries internet is better than the US at the moment.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
  18. Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (INF + 1) * 0 =/= 2

    Therefore

    2/0 =/= INF + 1

    Division by zero does NOT produce infinity as a result. This is because multiplication of 0 by infinity does not produce whole numbers as a result.

  19. Re:Old joke:All the Lemonade you can drink for a d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    At some point, the appropriate response is for the neighborhood to get together and close down the lemonade stand.

    No matter how libertarian the society - companies only exist at the allowance of the society.

  20. like children by AlexanKulbashian · · Score: 1

    infinity, infinity + 1, infinity + 2,

  21. With regard to Verizon's marketing BS: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe the great Samuel L. Jackson said it best when he asked:

    ENGLISH!! DO YOU SPEAK IT?!

  22. author is a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Data is, always has been, and always will be limited. There isn't a provider on Earth that truly offers unlimited data. Data is inherently limited by device and network capability and time. Author is failing at being a pedantic jackass.

    1. Re:author is a troll by green1 · · Score: 1

      Nobody is forcing the companies to call it unlimited when it isn't. That's their choice.

      People should expect to get what they paid for, it's the companies' fault if they can't provide what they sold.

  23. priming-the-pump TM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are priming-the-pump for when Net Neutrality is completely gone and these will be the new definitions shoved down our throats:

        - Unlimited: you can connect to any website of your choosing up to our Limited data caps.
        - Limited: you can connect to the predefined sites we chose for you up to our Limited data caps. Also know as the "Welcome to Portugal mother******!" plan.

  24. What did you expect? by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

    Everyone seems to harp on the fact that Hotspot/jetpack is limited to 15gb of data per device. The issue you run into is what happened during the early days of the Feb unlimited plan when this wasn't enforced. We had a ton of people eliminating their home wifi networks and running their entire home/connected world (home security cameras, tablets, televisions, game consoles, media servers or purely cord cutting) off of a jetpack. This crippled the network. Then there were post everywhere about how someone couldn't send a snapchat of their dog farting and looking shocked. Much less the issue of businesses trying to oporate off of Verizon that couldn't send out invoices or ambulances that use verizon to get medical information out to the truck due to network congestion.

    Under the current network restraints, it's just not possible to run things as fully unlimited the way people want. Much less for a lesser price and still have the money to build out a network that will be able to support your unlimited dog fart snapchats in the future.

    1. Re:What did you expect? by boundandgaggedwomen · · Score: 1

      Everyone seems to harp on the fact that Hotspot/jetpack is limited to 15gb of data per device. The issue you run into is what happened during the early days of the Feb unlimited plan when this wasn't enforced. We had a ton of people eliminating their home wifi networks and running their entire home/connected world (home security cameras, tablets, televisions, game consoles, media servers or purely cord cutting) off of a jetpack. This crippled the network. Then there were post everywhere about how someone couldn't send a snapchat of their dog farting and looking shocked. Much less the issue of businesses trying to oporate off of Verizon that couldn't send out invoices or ambulances that use verizon to get medical information out to the truck due to network congestion.

      Under the current network restraints, it's just not possible to run things as fully unlimited the way people want. Much less for a lesser price and still have the money to build out a network that will be able to support your unlimited dog fart snapchats in the future.

      Yep, as much as I don't like Verizon, I agree with you there. I knew someone who tried that and then bitched when it all went to hell.

    2. Re:What did you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone seems to harp on the fact that Hotspot/jetpack is limited to 15gb of data per device. The issue you run into is what happened during the early days of the Feb unlimited plan when this wasn't enforced. We had a ton of people eliminating their home wifi networks and running their entire home/connected world (home security cameras, tablets, televisions, game consoles, media servers or purely cord cutting) off of a jetpack. This crippled the network. Then there were post everywhere about how someone couldn't send a snapchat of their dog farting and looking shocked. Much less the issue of businesses trying to oporate off of Verizon that couldn't send out invoices or ambulances that use verizon to get medical information out to the truck due to network congestion.

      Under the current network restraints, it's just not possible to run things as fully unlimited the way people want. Much less for a lesser price and still have the money to build out a network that will be able to support your unlimited dog fart snapchats in the future.

      That's not the point. That's not even close to the point.

      Don't offer unlimited plans unless you can offer unlimited plans.

      It's really that simple. If you CAN'T do something, DON'T offer it.

      The equivalent to this in day-to-day would be me chatting somebody (Who has hiring authority at a company) up telling them I am the best of the best at exactly what they need me to do, getting a job at a firm they work at and not at all delivering on that.

      I'd get fired UNLESS I had a well written contract that went completely in my favor. I could still get fired, but I'd get the payout promised.

      Don't offer what you can't do. Fine. They can't do unlimited.

      Don't.
      Offer.
      It.

    3. Re:What did you expect? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      All true. Good reason why a mobile operator cannot offer an unlimited plan. The problem here is that Verizon are calling their plan unlimited, when it is not. The name of it is a complete lie. Transparently and boldly so. They are promoting the service as if it were something they both will not and can not deliver.

  25. Are there no truth in advertising laws in the USA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, aren't there any?

  26. Verizon who. by Charcharodon · · Score: 2
    The last time I was a Verizon customer was for FIOS. Those idiots sold it to Frontier so that was the last of the money they get from me. As far as cell service went Metro PCS, then switched it to T-Mobile 4-5 years back.....So Verizon/AT&T pricing policy = zero fucks given.

    We got the whole extended family on board ( I think we are up to 8 people on this plan) so extra lines are something like $10 a month for unlimited plans, may just get an extra phone just to stick in the car so I can be lazy and not even take my regular phone out of my pocket.

    A 150/150MBit fiber connection backstops the service at home.

    Cable, monthly contracts, phone leases, and other silly shit from the major players, thanks but no thanks.

    1. Re:Verizon who. by kriston · · Score: 1

      Verizon has given up on FiOS. There is a reason that there are no new builds except infills and government-mandated projects like Washington DC and New York City. There is a reason Frontier owns a huge former Verizon FiOS plants in 15+ states now and why Frontier's stock value has been flat since then.

      They originally planned to earn profits after a decade or two but the time horizon is so far out past two decades they fire-sold to Frontier and sued to be allowed to halt builds in DC and NYC.

      --

      Kriston

  27. Author does not understand volume pricing by chispito · · Score: 1

    And as if that wasn't bad enough, Verizon has also updated its convoluted sliding pricing scheme that adjusts based on how many phones are on a single bill.

    This is called volume pricing. In this case it is used to entice households to use the same carrier rather than shop around based on different needs. It may be bad, but it makes plenty of sense.

    --
    The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  28. Quit the BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No idea what anyone puts up with Verizon / ATT. I'll just continue enjoying my no bullshit Walmart plan.

    1. Re:Quit the BS by boundandgaggedwomen · · Score: 1

      No idea what anyone puts up with Verizon / ATT. I'll just continue enjoying my no bullshit Walmart plan.

      ATT sucks. My wife swore she would do without a phone before ever using them again and it has been 8 years and she is still saying that.

  29. nothing new by LiquidMind · · Score: 1

    Let's not forget; this is the same company that failed to grasp the difference between $.02 and $.0002

    https://consumerist.com/2006/1...

    (if anyone has the original audio, please post it)

    --
    This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
  30. One of the worst for service in US. by boundandgaggedwomen · · Score: 1

    Everyone I know who used Verizon has regretted it. Much slower to use with many more deadspots.

    1. Re:One of the worst for service in US. by Notabadguy · · Score: 1

      Everyone I know who used Verizon has regretted it. Much slower to use with many more deadspots.

      I had Straight Talk (prepaid vendor on the Verizon Network) and switched to Sprint because I was getting poor data in a lot of areas, and Sprint was offering the "free for a year" deal. I'm only three months into my Sprint "free" contract, but am trying to figure out if I should switch to Verizon because data availability is even worse.

      I don't know what to do.

    2. Re:One of the worst for service in US. by boundandgaggedwomen · · Score: 1

      Everyone I know who used Verizon has regretted it. Much slower to use with many more deadspots.

      I had Straight Talk (prepaid vendor on the Verizon Network) and switched to Sprint because I was getting poor data in a lot of areas, and Sprint was offering the "free for a year" deal. I'm only three months into my Sprint "free" contract, but am trying to figure out if I should switch to Verizon because data availability is even worse.

      I don't know what to do.

      Well I just has a co-worker quit Sprit after 3 days, it was so bad. It cost him $100 but he gave all 4 phones back and went back to ATT.

  31. Truth in advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to take issue with Verizon's use of the word 'unlimited'. Saying their service has "Unlimited Data" when in reality it is capped on a monthly basis feels like it runs afoul of the truth in advertising laws. Has the FTC chimed in on this nonsense? I don't buy into the notion that this is a 'branding' thing or a 'marketing campaign'

  32. Lame! I get 100GB for 9$ by Hemi+Rodner · · Score: 1

    I live in Israel, and I have the 100GB plan of 012mobile. And it's just 30 ILS (around 9$).

    Yay for me!

    Verizon are annoying.. like if you want to sell a device that connects to Verizon, you must get a Verizon certificate for that...

    --
    hemi
  33. they are redefining it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlimited means you can access social media, games, messages, email, etc, anything, you aren't limited. They aren't referring to amount of data transferred.

    Next is non-unlimited access, extra $$/mo for social media, or email, games, etc.

  34. Later this year ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    In addition to its Go Unlimited and Beyond Unlimited plans, Verizon is now adding a premium Above Unlimited plan to the mix, ...

    ... they'll offer their ultimate "Go Above and Beyond Unlimited" plan.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  35. Shithole Countrt Has No Consumer Protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Color us all shocked, SHOCKED, at how the plebs are exploited in the shithoke country USA.. shocked!

  36. Re: because if its not available in USA it doesnt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    youre such an amerikuk peon.

    ive been locked into an unlimited data plan on my canadian mobile for 9 years. eat my cock pleb!!

  37. Unlimited* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get an unlimited number of lines, there is no limit to the amount of lines you can purchase.

    You can pay an unlimited amount of overage fees, there is no limit to the amount of overage you can pay.

    You can pay an unlimited amount of money, there is no limit to the amount of money you can pay.

    We here are Verizon know consumers don't like limits, so we removed them from our billing systems. Feel free to surf to your hearts content! There is no limit to the amount of data we can bill you for!

  38. Unlimited Bullshit by rojash · · Score: 1

    and there are idiots willing to pay these asshole companies too.

  39. They might actually know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given how things go on the other side ofnthe pond with net neutrality... Unlimited can easily mean unrestricted, neutral data connection.

  40. Re:Old joke:All the Lemonade you can drink for a d by leonbev · · Score: 1

    Sure, but that doesn't really work with the other three lemonade stands in town are running the same "unlimited" lemonade scam.

  41. It's a plan to change the meaning of "unlimited" by davecb · · Score: 1

    Gresham's law is a monetary principle stating that "bad money drives out good". Humpty Dumpty's law is a linguistic principle stating that someone can can make words mean whatever they want... "which is to be master-that's all."

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  42. Deceptive advertising by spinitch · · Score: 1

    Unlimited approximates my frustration with such deceptive marketing puffing. Many companies use such descriptions Which is indicative of the company's attitudes towards their customers. PT Barnum quotes. Most people disregard, read the details and make an informed decision so seems ok but it shouldn't be taken so lightly. Industries like The telecoms have an oligopoly and need to be held to higher standards. The telecoms argue scale critical in providing services, which there is merit, but then they need to compensate by being more transparent in their terms of service.

  43. Re: because if its not available in USA it doesnt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a complete idiot if you believe your plan is truly unlimited. All plans are limited by technology and time.

  44. Are you confused yet? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    You won't be, after this week's episode of Soap!

  45. In a country where unlimited coffee refills come i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I find this outrage a little unbelievable. Americans always have had issues with the relativity of scale (only selling medium, large and extra large), so then deal with this also.

    Medium = small, therefore unlimited = limited.

  46. Re: In a country where unlimited coffee refills co by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone truncated the title. Should have read 'In a country where unlimited coffee refills come in three tiers...'

  47. Verizon's... No Idea What Unlimited Means by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

    "When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less."

    No, I'm afraid YOU'RE the one confused. You just expect it to be the common English language definition of the word. In this case Marketing has gotten involved, and it's not English anymore, even though the glyphs would appear to be so. Just think of it as Advanced Emoji.

    After all, they FEEL "unlimited" actually has a value of like 28GB, and who are YOU to completely invalidate their feelings? Corporations have people too -- you HORRIBLE person you!


    ---
    A decade ago, I used to work for Verizon Wireless in IT support. One of the things they told us (meaning sales and customer support, although we heard it too) was that Every Customer Was Supposed to Incur at least a $50 a month charge on their account. If not, you were to "make it so" by helping the customer make the correct decision if at ALL possible.

    Don't know, but I bet that amount as gone up instead of being rescinded.

    --
    If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
  48. Re:Are there no truth in advertising laws in the U by green1 · · Score: 1

    In the US bribes are legally protected as free speech, so the end result isn't exactly a surprise.

  49. a totally missed opportunity.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for verizon to go above and beyond, and actually deliver reasonable data use at a reasonable price instead of trickery and mind games and assaulting the english dictionary.

  50. China wins again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a sad sad country you Americans have for letting your betters treat you like that. Get some balls pussies.

    Join a Euro or Asian country and have proper laws to stop this kind of shit.

  51. They also re-define "Prorated" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you ever kick Verizon to the curb while you're still 'paying off' a phone, you'll discover that they have a defiinition of 'prorated' that is quite different than you might expect. You can read about it in the fine print of your several foot long contract.

  52. No confusion. Just lies as usual. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what corporate USA is like; companies advertise whatever lies they like and very rarely get called on it. And as long as they leave enough contradictions in the fine print to fool some people, they'll get people defending the practice too.

  53. Unlimited = AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both being currently rendered meaningless.

  54. Come to Finland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have unlimited 4G data for around $20/month. And it's unlimited. That's it. The end. No fine print.

  55. You are so clueless, you are confident again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your comment is like a McDonalds employee violently arguing that it makes sense ot ask "Do you want fries with that?" each and every time, no matter if the customer already said what he wanted.

    All I can say is: ... IEE754? ... Was that meant as a joke?
    "Bro, do you even know surreal numbers?" ... And given the definition of (i), you make the dumbest possible argument.
    ((i) came out of this exact kind of problem.)

    The dumber they are, the more confident they are. But you can tell how clueless they are, by how loud they are, how often they use memorized rules instead of arguments they thought about, and by how often they use words like "just ..." or "impossible" or "fact" or "simply", etc.

    So sit down, shut up, open the teeny-tiny box your mind is in, and start actually thinking for yourself for once in your life. ... Instead of existing solely on a memorized rule set, and either breaking down or becoming as aggressive as this, when you encounter anything outside of that and can’t handle it.

    If there is a math equivalent of McDonalds, you should^Wwill work there.

    1. Re:You are so clueless, you are confident again. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > All I can say is: ... IEE754? ... Was that meant as a joke?

      /sarcasm Gee, if only there was a place where we could pool our common knowledge, and even better, search it. I think I'll make a web page and call it IEEE 754

      I'll even document: exception handling: indications of exceptional conditions (such as division by zero, overflow, etc.), and call it NaN

      Nah, that will never catch on.

  56. Yea, I'll pay unlimited* money in return too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    * Actually, I.ll pay $50 for the first 1GB, and after that, they can get a dime for any further 100GB they give me!

    (And I dream of a world, where people are man enough to organize to a level where they can push big companies into doing exactly that, then do it once, and after they learned their lesson, choose not to. ... Even given the obligatory moles, propaganda, agents provocateurs and bought military police force that need to be fended off.)

  57. Then actually invest in your network for once! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of leeching money off of people just because you monopoly-can and/or got the biggest lever!

    How about you do some actual work for the money? Or is that incompatible with the psychopathic anti-morals of the organized profit crime?

  58. Re: I shot my boiling crocodile semen into him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nasus must have put a hit out on him.

  59. The Princess Bride Movie Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You keep using that word, I don't think it means what you think it means"

                  - My name is Inigo Montoya prepare to die,

  60. Ridiculous complexity not necessary by helamonster5031 · · Score: 1

    This ridiculous nonsense is exactly why I switched to Ting a few years ago, where you can simply pay for what you use. I don't want to support a company that is living in the past and obviously trying to make things so complicated for its customers in order to take advantage of them. Boo! I now have 5 lines with Ting and most months pay less than what I used to for 1 unlimited line on one of the old school providers. Simple website, simple billing, simple app, no nonsense. If you're interested, here's a $25 credit for you :-D https://z0hn6l4dk7d.ting.com/

  61. Fuck All of You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reading your comments make me want to stay as far away from tech as possible, so fuck all of you.

  62. Swedish smooth sailing by Stingray454 · · Score: 1

    Here in Sweden I enjoy a proper unlimited plan. Sure it's about $60 a month, but I regularly use 100-200 GB monthly with no issues at good speeds (10-20 mbit). I can also purchase additional data sim cards for ~$3 / piece monthly that connect to the same plan, which is a reasonable price. I have one for the wife, one for a 4g router in the summer house, one for an overnight apartment I stay at for work sometimes. It's sooo worth it not having to worry about usage at all.

  63. Re: MANAFORT IN PRISON, TRUMP TO FOLLOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....Poor snowflake, awwwwwwww....

    You the snowflake baby.
    You can not seem to get past 2016.
    Duly elected President Trump pisses on you every day with a five second tweet that you talk about ALL DAY.
    You are obsessed with the MAGA MAN.
    You should seek counseling.
    You need help.
    You need a reality check.
    You need to step outside the CNN/MSNBC echo chamber.
    TRUMP 2020!!!

  64. Duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing "unlimited" is the cluelessness of the general public who continues to shell out tons of money every month to support this BS. Stop buying it!!!

  65. Re:Old joke:All the Lemonade you can drink for a d by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention the farmer who lets me pick all the lemons off his tree I can for a dime. Hint: Its a ripoff, he only lets me pick one lemon for one dime! I bet thats who the lemonade stand owners learned it from.

  66. your forgetting net neutrality is now dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlimited will now start to mean that they are not blocking or slowing down certain services and websites.