Climate change means the UK is running out of water, OR climate change means the UK is flooding with water. You really can't assert both. Obviously you can have both. Flood: a lot of water in a very short time - look in a dictionary, perhaps you find a better definition. Lack of water/drought: you have no water when you need it.
The Android device of my GF has an address book app, that can only store one phone number and one email address for a person... the device has two sims, so have most of her friends...
People that buy Apple products typically don't use them strenuously and treat them as disposable either through failure or next year's model. Actually, thy do. Moron!
And your great grandma had limited options of contraception. My GF is Thai, she gets 50 in a few weeks. She had 11 siblings. 4 died in childhood, and 3 during adulthood. When she was 12: her mother explained to her about contraception and that condoms where not available when she (the mother) was younger. She and her 4 surviving sisters, all only have one child. If they have had less kids, they would be rich now, because due to inheritance, their land got split up on 8 siblings...
only to discover that unless you're using XCode, you may as well forget it That is nonsense. XCode is an IDE... that is all. You can use Emacs or Vim as long as you want. A makefile calling gcc etc. works on a Mac just like anywhere else!
Back 20 years ago, shared memory was common, no sandboxes, if you keep on moving your pointer values you will finally run into some other line of ram for an other system. Today we have sandboxes and virtualization, for added levels of protection, to make sure App 1 will not overwrite App 2. On windows or Mac OS... not on unix or anything else with an MMU.
Marx was a marxist, not a communist or socialist. And you americans keep mixing up the difference between the later two. While your explanation is "half right" regarding socialism, it is wrong regarding your definition of which countries are "capitalist". The correct term is "social market democracies"... we definitely don't consider us "capitalist".
As long as they heal their patient, it does not matter. Hint: homeopathy is not only diluted chemical, there are plenty of legit practices which have the label "homeopathic" on it, e.g. simple things like chamomile.
But not into the costs of the renewables, it is just cost for power plant owner. He has to see himself where to put them. The only argument you could make: if he never had the coal plant in the first place and not its associated costs, then he could sell power even cheaper.
USA is the second or third biggest emitter, so it matters. USA has besides Kuwait and some other exotic places the highest emission per capita: hence for them it is the easiest to reduce emissions. China can't, albeit they are working hard on renewables, nukes and electric cars/buses.
It does not matter if you replace a coal plant with a nuclear plant or with a renewable straight away. Except for: building the nuclear one takes ages, costs more, needs fuel, produces waste versus a cheap clean renewable plant can be put online piece by piece and produces no waste.
If coal and gas are integral to the deployment of renewables, then costs related to those coal and gas plants must ALSO be considered in the costs of renewables. Flat out. Do you have mental problems? No, the cost of already existing coal plants have nothing to do with the switch to renewables.
Slashdot Mirror
What has thermodynamics to do with your parents post?
Perhaps you want to fresh up your knowledge: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Oh, and, no place in Britain is more than 70 miles from the coast line-
You seem to have problems reading a map?
Britain is also fairly small geographically,
You definitely have problems reading a map.
South tip, e.g. Brighton, to north tip, e.g. Inverness, is 650 miles.
Climate change means the UK is running out of water, OR climate change means the UK is flooding with water. You really can't assert both.
Obviously you can have both.
Flood: a lot of water in a very short time - look in a dictionary, perhaps you find a better definition.
Lack of water/drought: you have no water when you need it.
Wow, that was simple again, idiot.
No, you can be knighted as a foreigner. However you can not use the title "Sir", e.g. Bill Gates is a "Knight of the British Empire".
iPhones run iOs.
Android devices run Android.
The Android device of my GF has an address book app, that can only store one phone number and one email address for a person ... the device has two sims, so have most of her friends ...
Go figure.
People that buy Apple products typically don't use them strenuously and treat them as disposable either through failure or next year's model.
Actually, thy do. Moron!
And your great grandma had limited options of contraception. ...
My GF is Thai, she gets 50 in a few weeks. She had 11 siblings. 4 died in childhood, and 3 during adulthood. When she was 12: her mother explained to her about contraception and that condoms where not available when she (the mother) was younger.
She and her 4 surviving sisters, all only have one child. If they have had less kids, they would be rich now, because due to inheritance, their land got split up on 8 siblings
A country can not simply ban a company from the market.
How exactly would that work?
Germany thanks the USA by going Communist.
Having universal health care does not make you communist, moron.
only to discover that unless you're using XCode, you may as well forget it ... that is all. You can use Emacs or Vim as long as you want.
That is nonsense. XCode is an IDE
A makefile calling gcc etc. works on a Mac just like anywhere else!
Why do I hate Apple so much?
Did you ever have a Mac?
Or an iPad?
Or an iPhone?
See ... so why do you hate them? If you have mental problems please seek counseling instead of going postal.
At Your Service
Back 20 years ago, shared memory was common, no sandboxes, if you keep on moving your pointer values you will finally run into some other line of ram for an other system. Today we have sandboxes and virtualization, for added levels of protection, to make sure App 1 will not overwrite App 2. ... not on unix or anything else with an MMU.
On windows or Mac OS
You are aware that the countries in your wikipedia link are listed alphabetical and not by corruptness?
it creates the possibility of withdrawing (say) $100 multiple times from an account which only contains $100.
No, it does not. Why would it?
You are to smart for this universe, go hide somewhere.
You are right, it is probably a glitch in the matrix.
unless you're willing to pay for tremendous overcapacity under optimal conditions.
This what we actually are willing to do, and are doing.
And Germany wide flautes are basically impossible.
Marx was a marxist, not a communist or socialist. And you americans keep mixing up the difference between the later two. While your explanation is "half right" regarding socialism, it is wrong regarding your definition of which countries are "capitalist". ... we definitely don't consider us "capitalist".
The correct term is "social market democracies"
All in Europe and Scandinavia ... plenty of Asians, too. E.g. Laos and Vietnam, and China.
And the people in Venezuela and North Korea only go hungry because of the sanctions of the US ... seems like a failure of capitalism to me.
As long as they heal their patient, it does not matter.
Hint: homeopathy is not only diluted chemical, there are plenty of legit practices which have the label "homeopathic" on it, e.g. simple things like chamomile.
Reminds me about this cartoon: https://henrykotula.com/2019/0...
But not into the costs of the renewables, it is just cost for power plant owner. He has to see himself where to put them. The only argument you could make: if he never had the coal plant in the first place and not its associated costs, then he could sell power even cheaper.
USA is the second or third biggest emitter, so it matters.
USA has besides Kuwait and some other exotic places the highest emission per capita: hence for them it is the easiest to reduce emissions. China can't, albeit they are working hard on renewables, nukes and electric cars/buses.
It does not matter if you replace a coal plant with a nuclear plant or with a renewable straight away.
Except for: building the nuclear one takes ages, costs more, needs fuel, produces waste versus a cheap clean renewable plant can be put online piece by piece and produces no waste.
If coal and gas are integral to the deployment of renewables, then costs related to those coal and gas plants must ALSO be considered in the costs of renewables. Flat out.
Do you have mental problems? No, the cost of already existing coal plants have nothing to do with the switch to renewables.