The question does not make much sense. a) Scala and Kotlin did not exist that time b) Scala and Kotlin run on the JVM and use the Java infrastructure
The answer would probably be Groovy, or a combination of Groovy and Scala. Scala for the internals as a superiour replacement for Java, and Groovy to glue it together and for the UI.
Kotlin has in my eyes no real advantage over Java, except cleaning up the syntax by not requiring public/private/final everywhere because the default chose by the compiler is "the right thing" and type inference, but that has java as well meanwhile.
I'd probably stay away from Java widget toolkits. And why? Swing is excellent and the new JavaFX as well. And exactly do you write a Java desktop app without using a Java Widget library anyway? Some idiotic WxWindows bindings?
FPS has a huge impact. visual latency and motor-reactions are so slow that above 25PFS That is simply wrong. 25FPS is the lowest minimum to don't be distracted by flickering, that is all.
When the game world is updating with 50FPS then a screen with higher frequency is better. Most important however is the mouse and how it is synched with the game FPS and screen FPS.
With higher screen FPS it is simply much easier to correctly aim!
Is Facebook legal in the restrictive countries? No. But violating other peoples privacy by posting pictures of them with out consent is.
How about photos from a music festival (and/or recording of the band)? Depends, they used to be forbidden (signs everywhere and written on the ticket), but a random shot is usually ok (also to publish on Fb etc.) because it is a public event. Inside of a pub e.g. the band usually would not care. On a big festival it is more or less accepted because you can't do anything against it anyway.
But recording a video of a whole song and publishing it would strictly speaking be a copyright violation.
What about drones? Allowed as long as you don't fly them over other peoples property. If you post pictures/movies, you have to blur out the people.
I guess your movie would not be a problem anywhere as it does not depict real people or license plates.
I really don't give a shit what your "parent" was arguing, and that should be obvious because I didn't reply to him. Then why did you reply to me? Sounds pretty pointless... a helicopter makes more than 122 miles... can go nearly every where and contains: a doctor.
If you want to argue you can drive safe and fast from A to B and the equivalent ambulance needs more time from B to A... then please accept: that is only true in extremely special cases. And has nothing to do with helicopters or cars not exceeding 122miles.
My car e.g. is parked a mile away from my house... also a special case.
In the US it depends on states, in most states you need a permit, just as in Germany. And they distinguish between "open" and "concealed" (hidden) carrying.
The difference basically is: the US has a "right" written in the constitution, Germany has not. The regulation is based on criminal laws in Germany.
You kin color is irrelevant to a recognizer looking for human forms. It is not.
When it is dark white skin is easier to see than black skin. For your eyes, as well as for a camera.
do a lot of image transformations such that color is usually disposed of. Making a colour picture into a black and white picture still leaves the black people black and the white people white.
Yes, in theory. In practice, you'll never measure it. If you would sail all ships on earth close to a pole the axis would shift significantly, easy to measure.
Even an amount as tiny as provided by an ion drive will have a much more measurable effect than gravity alone given enough time. Erm, no? It is by conversation of momentum and conversation of energy: the exact same effect/work.
It may be safer, but it is not always faster, and it is not always best for the patient. If, for example, all four ambulances of the fire department are out on other calls when I need one, they may be hours away from being able to help. Hours. And I can make a five minute drive. Compare the time. Five minutes, on planet Earth, is shorter than "hours". Maybe different on the planet where you live.
You only know that after you called emergency. The parent just wanted to drive ahead and complained a car reduced to a speed of maximum 122 might get his mother die.
The rest of your argument, again, is just silly nitpicking.
That concept of "public record" and "free to post" because "it is pubic" does not exist in Europe.
You recorded another private person, posting about her - aka making it public - is illegal. Every evidence gathered from it would be useless in court. The only thing you can do is: show it to law enforcement.
That is actually a no brainer, laws in the US are similar.
I think the problem is the idiotic mentality to hire the cheapest. Autonomous cars in Germany usually have 2 or 3 passengers, one the obvious back up driver, and the others are engineers. They keep each other awake and pay attention and usually have diagnostic screens active and a laptop connected to the car system.
So I should prepare to eat as much Saltimbocca Romana as I can get next weeks, before Salvia is banned?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... (No, I'm not affiliated, but that was the best recipe I could found on short notice. However the guy uses much to less of it:P
I think the point you just missed is that different people have different situations to deal with, and blanket statements like yours calling something idiotic based solely on your situation is, itself, idiotic. No, they don't have.
It is always faster and safer to call the emergency and get an ambulance to YOUR place than take a sick/wounded/injured into your car and drive to the next hospital YOU think is the right one.
Yes, I think the "call a helo" answer is the idiotic one. You don't literally call a helo. You call emergency, and they decide if they sent a helo.
You still don't grasp the grand parents mistake, he thinks a car that is throttled down can not be used to save his mother, when the right thing is to get a doctor ASAP to his place and not hurry around in a car to SOME place.
The parent was idiotic. Why do yo give a moronic answer is beyond me.
The closest helicopter base to my house is not even a mile, in case you are interested. But I have three hospitals around me, each about a mile or less than a mile away. Obviously they all would send an ambulance...
In your case it is the same, why not call an ambulance (emergency number) with a real doctor inside than driving yourself to the hospital and trying to get attention of emergency personell?
And hint: a helicopter does not need an hour for 60mile... modern helicopters are like cars, you fire them up and 1 or 2 mins later they are ready to go.
We actually have rights to wear arms. Or bear. And in Europe gun ownership is probably the highest in Germany.
We don't have the right to carry them everywhere, for that you need an extra permit on top of the permit to own them.
Yes, you need to acquire a weapon permit, but thats it... and obey the rules coming with it, e.g.: weapon stored uncharged in a safe, separated from ammunition at another safe spot. Transport only in a closed compartment, only in your cars trunk and not in public transport etc. p.p.
Fatalities per inhabitants is irrelevant. Relevant is fatalities per distance driven. And you hardly can compare Sweden or Switzerland with Germany. The structure of the roads, the weather, especially the winters are completely different. In Germany they either panic when they see snow and drive ridiculous slow, or they drive like maniacs, because they think it is better to be at home before it is dark... or whatever.
Exceeding speed limits is illegal even if you have an emergency to transport. The idea that you can bring your mother faster to the hospital in your car, than a helicopter reachers your house, is completely idiotic.
The general speed limit might be 120 (on highways), but there are plenty of highways where it is higher, e.g. in France: 160 km/h (or was it 140? and I just burn 160? uh uh, don't remember:D )
Slashdot Mirror
The question does not make much sense.
a) Scala and Kotlin did not exist that time
b) Scala and Kotlin run on the JVM and use the Java infrastructure
The answer would probably be Groovy, or a combination of Groovy and Scala. Scala for the internals as a superiour replacement for Java, and Groovy to glue it together and for the UI.
Kotlin has in my eyes no real advantage over Java, except cleaning up the syntax by not requiring public/private/final everywhere because the default chose by the compiler is "the right thing" and type inference, but that has java as well meanwhile.
I'd probably stay away from Java widget toolkits.
And why? Swing is excellent and the new JavaFX as well. And exactly do you write a Java desktop app without using a Java Widget library anyway? Some idiotic WxWindows bindings?
FPS has a huge impact. visual latency and motor-reactions are so slow that above 25PFS That is simply wrong. 25FPS is the lowest minimum to don't be distracted by flickering, that is all.
When the game world is updating with 50FPS then a screen with higher frequency is better. Most important however is the mouse and how it is synched with the game FPS and screen FPS.
With higher screen FPS it is simply much easier to correctly aim!
Is Facebook legal in the restrictive countries?
No. But violating other peoples privacy by posting pictures of them with out consent is.
How about photos from a music festival (and/or recording of the band)?
Depends, they used to be forbidden (signs everywhere and written on the ticket), but a random shot is usually ok (also to publish on Fb etc.) because it is a public event. Inside of a pub e.g. the band usually would not care. On a big festival it is more or less accepted because you can't do anything against it anyway.
But recording a video of a whole song and publishing it would strictly speaking be a copyright violation.
What about drones?
Allowed as long as you don't fly them over other peoples property. If you post pictures/movies, you have to blur out the people.
I guess your movie would not be a problem anywhere as it does not depict real people or license plates.
It might be fine in the US unless you show the driver clearly. Then you most likely violate his privacy rights in the US, too.
Interesting links, though. I did not know they are completely forbidden in Austria e.g.
I really don't give a shit what your "parent" was arguing, and that should be obvious because I didn't reply to him. ... a helicopter makes more than 122 miles ... can go nearly every where and contains: a doctor.
Then why did you reply to me? Sounds pretty pointless
If you want to argue you can drive safe and fast from A to B and the equivalent ambulance needs more time from B to A ... then please accept: that is only true in extremely special cases. And has nothing to do with helicopters or cars not exceeding 122miles.
My car e.g. is parked a mile away from my house ... also a special case.
In the US it depends on states, in most states you need a permit, just as in Germany. And they distinguish between "open" and "concealed" (hidden) carrying.
The difference basically is: the US has a "right" written in the constitution, Germany has not. The regulation is based on criminal laws in Germany.
Yeah, for me it is the same reason not to drive to fast, the noise.
Well, I'm not driving much, so I rarely meet Belgians in our times, but I will stay vigilant :D
You kin color is irrelevant to a recognizer looking for human forms.
It is not.
When it is dark white skin is easier to see than black skin. For your eyes, as well as for a camera.
do a lot of image transformations such that color is usually disposed of.
Making a colour picture into a black and white picture still leaves the black people black and the white people white.
Yes, in theory. In practice, you'll never measure it.
If you would sail all ships on earth close to a pole the axis would shift significantly, easy to measure.
Even an amount as tiny as provided by an ion drive will have a much more measurable effect than gravity alone given enough time.
Erm, no? It is by conversation of momentum and conversation of energy: the exact same effect/work.
It may be safer, but it is not always faster, and it is not always best for the patient. If, for example, all four ambulances of the fire department are out on other calls when I need one, they may be hours away from being able to help. Hours. And I can make a five minute drive. Compare the time. Five minutes, on planet Earth, is shorter than "hours". Maybe different on the planet where you live.
You only know that after you called emergency. The parent just wanted to drive ahead and complained a car reduced to a speed of maximum 122 might get his mother die.
The rest of your argument, again, is just silly nitpicking.
That concept of "public record" and "free to post" because "it is pubic" does not exist in Europe.
You recorded another private person, posting about her - aka making it public - is illegal. Every evidence gathered from it would be useless in court. The only thing you can do is: show it to law enforcement.
That is actually a no brainer, laws in the US are similar.
I think the problem is the idiotic mentality to hire the cheapest.
Autonomous cars in Germany usually have 2 or 3 passengers, one the obvious back up driver, and the others are engineers. They keep each other awake and pay attention and usually have diagnostic screens active and a laptop connected to the car system.
Are we talking about this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ?
So I should prepare to eat as much Saltimbocca Romana as I can get next weeks, before Salvia is banned?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... (No, I'm not affiliated, but that was the best recipe I could found on short notice. However the guy uses much to less of it :P
I think the point you just missed is that different people have different situations to deal with, and blanket statements like yours calling something idiotic based solely on your situation is, itself, idiotic.
No, they don't have.
It is always faster and safer to call the emergency and get an ambulance to YOUR place than take a sick/wounded/injured into your car and drive to the next hospital YOU think is the right one.
Yes, I think the "call a helo" answer is the idiotic one. You don't literally call a helo. You call emergency, and they decide if they sent a helo.
You still don't grasp the grand parents mistake, he thinks a car that is throttled down can not be used to save his mother, when the right thing is to get a doctor ASAP to his place and not hurry around in a car to SOME place.
And what would DRM have to do with owning a song you bought, or not owning it?
And I thought it was "+1 Insightful" ... sigh.
The parent was idiotic. Why do yo give a moronic answer is beyond me.
The closest helicopter base to my house is not even a mile, in case you are interested. But I have three hospitals around me, each about a mile or less than a mile away. Obviously they all would send an ambulance ...
In your case it is the same, why not call an ambulance (emergency number) with a real doctor inside than driving yourself to the hospital and trying to get attention of emergency personell?
And hint: a helicopter does not need an hour for 60mile ... modern helicopters are like cars, you fire them up and 1 or 2 mins later they are ready to go.
can often be IFR/icing ...
No idea what that means
I just put the videos on YouTube forever and email the company and/or police. ...
Illegal mostly everywhere
We actually have rights to wear arms. Or bear.
And in Europe gun ownership is probably the highest in Germany.
We don't have the right to carry them everywhere, for that you need an extra permit on top of the permit to own them.
Yes, you need to acquire a weapon permit, but thats it ... and obey the rules coming with it, e.g.: weapon stored uncharged in a safe, separated from ammunition at another safe spot. Transport only in a closed compartment, only in your cars trunk and not in public transport etc. p.p.
The worst drivers in Europe used to be Belgians. I rarely drive faster than 150km/h, but at night on an empty highway I sometimes do.
Fatalities per inhabitants is irrelevant. Relevant is fatalities per distance driven. ... or whatever.
And you hardly can compare Sweden or Switzerland with Germany. The structure of the roads, the weather, especially the winters are completely different. In Germany they either panic when they see snow and drive ridiculous slow, or they drive like maniacs, because they think it is better to be at home before it is dark
Exceeding speed limits is illegal even if you have an emergency to transport. The idea that you can bring your mother faster to the hospital in your car, than a helicopter reachers your house, is completely idiotic.
The general speed limit might be 120 (on highways), but there are plenty of highways where it is higher, e.g. in France: 160 km/h (or was it 140? and I just burn 160? uh uh, don't remember :D )
Autonomous and driver assist cars read the speed limit signs ...