You are an idiot. France has 60M inhabitants, Germany 80M. How should Germany polute 10x more than France? Who and how should use the energy? You have no idea about scales, as I said above: you are an idiot.
End user orices are actually going down since a few years, and if you are using heise.de or other web sites to switch away from your local power company you basically pay 30% less than you used to pay. Customers are lazy, that is whay the energy prices for house holds don't drop rapidly.
Consumer energy prices are falling since 5 years in germany. And we are and always were far away fromthe top, look e.g. at Hawaii. Comsumers never payed a premium here, as simple house hold consumers have a fixed price, completely unrelated to the spot market.
No it is not, but up to you. Median without knowing, min, max and average is a meaningless number. Statements like: over thje years the mediagn increased are even more meyaningless. Especially if you talk about income and theu amount of poor increased much more than the amount of rich people. But as I said: up to you.
No, it is not. Read a book about it. First of all, meat only has half the calories per weight than carbs or fat. Secondly, to yield a certain amount of calories via meat, you have to feed the animal ten times as much food, that is mot efficient in any meaningfull way.
Choice between sfomey grilled insects and 'real meat' obviously leads to eating both. Ever eat prawns or shrimps? Most insects taste in the middle between sea food and nuts, grilled nuts. In otrqhero words: they don't even compare with most meats.
It would be nice if/. ers (or is that an american thing? then americans!) would stop mixing up 'median' with 'average'. Hint: 1 2 5 9 15 3 4 5 99 100.000.000 Both lines of numbers have the same median,
Oh man are you nitpicking. Do you have a single real world example where you can 'tail cal optimize' a non recursive function call? Hu? It would require that the target function takes the same arguments in the same order. And then you would not call it 'tail call optimization' even if it is the same thing. I never heard about a compiler trying to optimize a JSR away for a JMP if the call is not a recursive one.
It is only for recursion, does not matter if dual or single. For other calls, there is nothing to optimize, they are basically 'automatically optimized'.
You can easily install any combination of libraries and apps on any linux and other unix system. If you have problems visit the relevant forums. Hint: $LD_LIBRARY_PATH, $PATH.
And adjusts the language to spell check according to the chosen keyboard? Even has a 'switch keyboard button' on the keyboard? Or even better: simply recognizes the language even if you use a different keyboard?
Tail call optimization refers to optimization of recursive functions. The question if the caller or calee clears the stack has bottom line no influence. For C it is required that the callee clears it because of variable argument lists. On the other hand you could use the heap to transfer arguments, but that leaves the same fundamental problem.
I have a serious problem with this kind of article redefining what words mean
The Left has been doing it since at least the 1970s. For example, redefining abortion from killing babies to "excising tissue masses" and "freedom of choice".
This is what I answered to. A fertilized egg is not a baby. An the whole thing has nothing to do with left and right.
So either you want to explain why you think a fertilized egg and/or a 6 weeks old fetus is a baby, or you want to explain what this topic has to do with being left or right.
Te summary clearly states that weight is no problem, hence you have no repairs bellow the surface... just read it again, or read the article. No idea why you are asking pointless questions for a one mile long research experiment.
Slashdot Mirror
Well,
cite your sources [common knowledge]
We live here since a while, I for my part for 50 years.
I'm not googeling stuff for you we learn in school here, google your self, lazy ass.
You are an idiot.
France has 60M inhabitants, Germany 80M.
How should Germany polute 10x more than France?
Who and how should use the energy? You have no idea about scales, as I said above: you are an idiot.
End user orices are actually going down since a few years, and if you are using heise.de or other web sites to switch away from your local power company you basically pay 30% less than you used to pay.
Customers are lazy, that is whay the energy prices for house holds don't drop rapidly.
It is actually called European Energy eXchange: https://www.eex.com/en#/en
Consumer energy prices are falling since 5 years in germany.
And we are and always were far away fromthe top, look e.g. at Hawaii.
Comsumers never payed a premium here, as simple house hold consumers have a fixed price, completely unrelated to the spot market.
No it is not, but up to you.
Median without knowing, min, max and average is a meaningless number.
Statements like: over thje years the mediagn increased are even more meyaningless. Especially if you talk about income and theu amount of poor increased much more than the amount of rich people.
But as I said: up to you.
That is problem with all 'industrial' grown food. ... eek!
They grow to fast and taste like nothing. Tomatoes, e.g.
No, it is not.
Read a book about it.
First of all, meat only has half the calories per weight than carbs or fat.
Secondly, to yield a certain amount of calories via meat, you have to feed the animal ten times as much food, that is mot efficient in any meaningfull way.
But girl friends you win.
Hint: you can put stripes of a steak, chicken, trout, salmon, cheese etc. on top of a salad.
No offense, but when people don't like Broccoli (or insert hate vegetable here) I really wonder what is wrong with their tongues.
Choice between sfomey grilled insects and 'real meat' obviously leads to eating both.
Ever eat prawns or shrimps? Most insects taste in the middle between sea food and nuts, grilled nuts. In otrqhero words: they don't even compare with most meats.
It would be nice if /. ers (or is that an american thing? then americans!) would stop mixing up 'median' with 'average'.
Hint:
1 2 5 9 15
3 4 5 99 100.000.000
Both lines of numbers have the same median,
You live in the wrong country ...
Yes, you idiot.
My question was: what has left and right to do with it?
It was clearly marked with a question mark. If case you did not notice.
Oh man are you nitpicking.
Do you have a single real world example where you can 'tail cal optimize' a non recursive function call?
Hu? It would require that the target function takes the same arguments in the same order.
And then you would not call it 'tail call optimization' even if it is the same thing.
I never heard about a compiler trying to optimize a JSR away for a JMP if the call is not a recursive one.
It is only for recursion, does not matter if dual or single.
For other calls, there is nothing to optimize, they are basically 'automatically optimized'.
For funk sake, why don't you urge /. to support unicode instead?
Funny, three or four hours ago, I was about to write the exact same thing, with nearly the exact same words :)
All VM vendors I know, vmware, virtualbox and Parallels support Mac OS X as guest OS.
If you don't mnow how, use google.
You can easily install any combination of libraries and apps on any linux and other unix system.
If you have problems visit the relevant forums.
Hint: $LD_LIBRARY_PATH, $PATH.
And adjusts the language to spell check according to the chosen keyboard?
Even has a 'switch keyboard button' on the keyboard?
Or even better: simply recognizes the language even if you use a different keyboard?
Tail call optimization refers to optimization of recursive functions.
The question if the caller or calee clears the stack has bottom line no influence.
For C it is required that the callee clears it because of variable argument lists.
On the other hand you could use the heap to transfer arguments, but that leaves the same fundamental problem.
You seem to be an idiot.
I have a serious problem with this kind of article redefining what words mean
The Left has been doing it since at least the 1970s. For example, redefining abortion from killing babies to "excising tissue masses" and "freedom of choice".
This is what I answered to.
A fertilized egg is not a baby. An the whole thing has nothing to do with left and right.
So either you want to explain why you think a fertilized egg and/or a 6 weeks old fetus is a baby, or you want to explain what this topic has to do with being left or right.
But obviously you don't want ...
It is not necessary to break even.
The EVs have a battery.
So if you are close to break even with such a system, you extend the range of an EV greatly.
Te summary clearly states that weight is no problem, hence you have no repairs bellow the surface ... just read it again, or read the article.
No idea why you are asking pointless questions for a one mile long research experiment.