Thermodynamics applies to all transfers of energy, which includes electrical power It does not... But if you believe otherwise that is your problem not mine.
After all you are not working in electric engineering:D
No, we can not agree on those laws. The first one is not a law, it is an axiom. One of our basic assumptions like conversation of momentum. I believe we only have those two:D The second one is already wrong. Transfer of energy does not increase Entropy. Why would it?
Thermodynamics has application in ALL cases where energy is transferred or transformed No it has not. Reads the damn wiki article.
A photon hits an electron, the electron changes "orbit". No energy "lost", no thermodynamics involved. The electron jumps back to its old orbit, it emits an identical photon, with same wavelength and energy: nothing lost, no thermodynamics involved.
Last time some school kid with no physics in school wrote such nonsense, I gave two dozens of examples. Perhaps you find my old post.
Thermodynamics has two single laws that have a general purpose application: the sum of the energy in a closed system is constant. Entropy is over time increasing.
The rest of the laws are about ideal gases under heat and pressure. Should be clearly written in the wiki article, which you obviously did not read or someone rewrote it in bad/misleading english again?
The core of the laws of Thermodynamics is a simple realization: if you convert energy to heat then it is hard/impossible to convert everything back into a "useful" energy.
The law of Thermodynamics says absolutely nothing about converting magnetic energy into electric energy into electric fields into kinetic energy etc. p.p. Hint: get a damn clue what the greek introduction syllable Thermo means, aka as in Thermometer.
It is actually pretty clear that I work in IT, and that we all hate: AD Sharepoint Exchange
Those are not standard, they are MS bullshit "EXTEND" ideas.
I basically work since 15 years in Java projects where we replace the outside requirements to interface with e.g. AD and Exchange.
Which is actually from the Java standpoint pretty straight forward, as those systems interface with Java, but the rest of the IT wants to get rid of them,
It's not your fault that you're completely ignorant as to their deep integration with Windows and Office on a level that any 3rd party tool couldn't hope to ever achieve.
And you are pretty ignorant how many systems need to import an Excel sheet, but don't need to fetch it from Sharepoint. A traditional ftp to a watched directory on a unix host is enough.
The MS tools don't solve problems. They create work for MS tool fans/experts. That is all.
No one really 'finds' my facebook page. Everything is set to private and I only accept friend requests from RL friends and Aikidoka, I somewhat know.
If a HR department would access FB pages of applicants they would be sued into oblivion, literally. The people working there, doing it would risk to be unemployable for life as HR people.
No idea if you are a retard or live in a fucked up country where such behaviour could/would be legal:)
Your examples might be _extend_ examples, and for 2) I could have given a document management system standard, but my standpoint holds. The three examples your parent gave are simply bollocks and prime examples for Microsofts EEE strategy.
I worked with the early implementations of Sharepoint, It was an unbackable version control system for office documents with some Wikis surrounding them.
For that we have Atlassian Confluence since... 15 years?
Comparing Exchange/Outlook with open standards is an insult. That this baffles you is no wonder... Outlook is an horrible unusable mess, no idea how you can think otherwise. Every funky standard feature the competition has, you have to google how to activate/use it, and then it only works half assed.
My Mac happily connects to an exchange server, so does my android stuff. And: I have every damn functionality in its own App instead of an unusable monster. You can not even read emails in Outlook while you are using the calendar, are you retarded? The stupid way how the 'find this email/person in the address book' in outlook/mail... hÃ? Who invented this bollocks? I need that every day, it nearly never works as 'expected'. I'm expected to learn how the machine works... O'RLLY? In 2017?
There are hundreds of OS group ware tools, web based, that connect to an Exchange server. But why would they, when everything exchange gives can be done with email and MIME attachments?
Microsoft probably killed 100 or more companies. Perhaps you like to google the latest attempt I remember, the MS vs. Sun debacle about the attempt to kill Java?
Actually that is what I was thinking, too. Considering that MS once had its on Unix, Xenix, it is absurd what they did the last 25 years. Having a Linux core like Apple has its BSD core makes perfectly sense. Run Windows apps side by side with X11 and they would be a competition again. Now thy are only market leader in installations, not in growth or money.
1)Active Director + 2) Sharepoint + 3) Exchange. 1) LDAP, dozens of implementations 2) git, SVN etc. 3) mail standards like iCalc/MIME, SMTP, POP, IMAP.
Sorry, but you are _indeed_ an idiot.
And everything above can be backed up with standard tools. Sharepoint not so much.
Java is an island some where in the Pacific. Java is a enterprise computing platform and frameworks. Java is a programming language.
Feel free to run your 'J2EE' framework dependent applications on a backend without installing the Java Enterprise Edition.
I might have overseen an important statement you want to make, however you seem just to be a nitpicker. No one really understands/grasps what you want to say.
Google around and install 'Java the language' on your computer, and see how fat that gets you.
Slashdot Mirror
In Switzerland you can pay with Euro on most places. And have bank account in Euro ...
I would suggest to google.
I used plenty of such systems, but I have no such systems name in my brain.
I have no Exchange/Outlook at hand right no, but thanx for the hint "View | To-Do Bar | Calendar."
Thermodynamics applies to all transfers of energy, which includes electrical power ...
It does not
But if you believe otherwise that is your problem not mine.
After all you are not working in electric engineering :D
No, we can not agree on those laws. The first one is not a law, it is an axiom. One of our basic assumptions like conversation of momentum. I believe we only have those two :D
The second one is already wrong. Transfer of energy does not increase Entropy. Why would it?
But you can not contact them as you are one a "track" and have special skids that can absolutely not leave the tracks.
Yes it is, because you're saying there's such thing as 100% secure system. There isn't.
When the systems is 100% free of bugs is is also 100% secure.
Can you prove that it has 100% no bugs? No, you can't.
Just because you don't know if it is bug free does not mean that it has bugs.
The rest of your rant clearly indicates that YOU have no clue. A bit more respect to fellow computer scientists please :D
E.g. your ranting about inputs makes no sense ... My example was a perfect counterexample, hehe. Far sketched, yes. But that was the point!
Of corse it avoids it.
You are not actually using your fingers or muscles.
Apple does not sell eBooks.
The authors of eBooks sell eBooks, using Apples and Amazons and other platforms.
I'm confused ... she stashed his nuts? At different places?
I was more thinking about what you call "pigeon hole sorting" ;D
I was about to say the exact same thing.
The even dig out stashes when felt observed by crows or other squirrels and burry them elsewhere.
As i said: I always thought CCleaner was malware anyway?
I other words: I asked you to seek them yourself, I'm to lazy to teach a guy who is to lazy to google for himself :D
I would not wonder if there is not even an wikipedia article about it, such as: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... oO, there is!
Thermodynamics has application in ALL cases where energy is transferred or transformed
No it has not. Reads the damn wiki article.
A photon hits an electron, the electron changes "orbit". No energy "lost", no thermodynamics involved. The electron jumps back to its old orbit, it emits an identical photon, with same wavelength and energy: nothing lost, no thermodynamics involved.
Last time some school kid with no physics in school wrote such nonsense, I gave two dozens of examples. Perhaps you find my old post.
Thermodynamics has two single laws that have a general purpose application: the sum of the energy in a closed system is constant. Entropy is over time increasing.
The rest of the laws are about ideal gases under heat and pressure. Should be clearly written in the wiki article, which you obviously did not read or someone rewrote it in bad/misleading english again?
The core of the laws of Thermodynamics is a simple realization: if you convert energy to heat then it is hard/impossible to convert everything back into a "useful" energy.
The law of Thermodynamics says absolutely nothing about converting magnetic energy into electric energy into electric fields into kinetic energy etc. p.p. Hint: get a damn clue what the greek introduction syllable Thermo means, aka as in Thermometer.
A hyperloop cab can not derail.
It uses U shaped skids that wrap around the rail, facepalm.
But there is nothing in the tube that they can hit :D
It is actually pretty clear that I work in IT, and that we all hate:
AD
Sharepoint
Exchange
Those are not standard, they are MS bullshit "EXTEND" ideas.
I basically work since 15 years in Java projects where we replace the outside requirements to interface with e.g. AD and Exchange.
Which is actually from the Java standpoint pretty straight forward, as those systems interface with Java, but the rest of the IT wants to get rid of them,
It's not your fault that you're completely ignorant as to their deep integration with Windows and Office on a level that any 3rd party tool couldn't hope to ever achieve.
And you are pretty ignorant how many systems need to import an Excel sheet, but don't need to fetch it from Sharepoint. A traditional ftp to a watched directory on a unix host is enough.
The MS tools don't solve problems. They create work for MS tool fans/experts. That is all.
The point is they tried to extinguish Java.
From where the term EEE comes, I leave up to your GOOGLE skills, I guess YOU find much more than 100 examples where they succeeded.
Or do you really thing the world does MS an injustice by inventing the term EEE ... how old are you?
No one really 'finds' my facebook page.
Everything is set to private and I only accept friend requests from RL friends and Aikidoka, I somewhat know.
If a HR department would access FB pages of applicants they would be sued into oblivion, literally. The people working there, doing it would risk to be unemployable for life as HR people.
No idea if you are a retard or live in a fucked up country where such behaviour could/would be legal :)
Your examples might be _extend_ examples, and for 2) I could have given a document management system standard, but my standpoint holds.
The three examples your parent gave are simply bollocks and prime examples for Microsofts EEE strategy.
I worked with the early implementations of Sharepoint, It was an unbackable version control system for office documents with some Wikis surrounding them.
For that we have Atlassian Confluence since ... 15 years?
Comparing Exchange/Outlook with open standards is an insult. That this baffles you is no wonder ...
Outlook is an horrible unusable mess, no idea how you can think otherwise. Every funky standard feature the competition has, you have to google how to activate/use it, and then it only works half assed.
My Mac happily connects to an exchange server, so does my android stuff. And: I have every damn functionality in its own App instead of an unusable monster. You can not even read emails in Outlook while you are using the calendar, are you retarded? The stupid way how the 'find this email/person in the address book' in outlook/mail ... hÃ? Who invented this bollocks? I need that every day, it nearly never works as 'expected'. I'm expected to learn how the machine works ... O'RLLY? In 2017?
There are hundreds of OS group ware tools, web based, that connect to an Exchange server. But why would they, when everything exchange gives can be done with email and MIME attachments?
Microsoft probably killed 100 or more companies.
Perhaps you like to google the latest attempt I remember, the MS vs. Sun debacle about the attempt to kill Java?
Actually that is what I was thinking, too.
Considering that MS once had its on Unix, Xenix, it is absurd what they did the last 25 years.
Having a Linux core like Apple has its BSD core makes perfectly sense.
Run Windows apps side by side with X11 and they would be a competition again. Now thy are only market leader in installations, not in growth or money.
1)Active Director + 2) Sharepoint + 3) Exchange.
1) LDAP, dozens of implementations
2) git, SVN etc.
3) mail standards like iCalc/MIME, SMTP, POP, IMAP.
Sorry, but you are _indeed_ an idiot.
And everything above can be backed up with standard tools. Sharepoint not so much.
Only the first part is correct, HK is a "China" as much as Taiwan is is bollocks.
Java is an island some where in the Pacific.
Java is a enterprise computing platform and frameworks.
Java is a programming language.
Feel free to run your 'J2EE' framework dependent applications on a backend without installing the Java Enterprise Edition.
I might have overseen an important statement you want to make, however you seem just to be a nitpicker.
No one really understands/grasps what you want to say.
Google around and install 'Java the language' on your computer, and see how fat that gets you.
Then obviously your advertisement did not reach the target audience.
That is your fault, not twitters.