I'm not attacking you. I haven't even insulted you. I put up two quotes. One was supposed to be a reply to the first. I pointed out that it was simply not that. I am unsure why it is you think that I'm supposed to read your mind if your intended message was completely absent. If your concrete message is that it's more than a repository, then I find it curious that it came out only after your post had been desputed (several times, actually as I'm finding this out in your replys to me).
Also curious is how every single reply to you is along the same lines, and yet everyone else but you is wrong. Further more, you're consistenly insulting those that reply to you. The only one foaming at the mouth is you, and you're projecting it. I detect a hint of narcissism or extreeme immaturity due to young age. For your sake I hope it's the latter.
What's a "web app marketplace" and why would I need one anyway? There's plenty of useful software available to me in the repositories. There are plenty of websites I can browse with a regular browser. There are plenty of extensions I can use to customize my browsing experience.
Seriously, what does a "web app marketplace" have to offer that isn't already done better through one of the above resources?
AC:
OP is suggesting repositories replace this which is completely ridiculous.
My conclusion: AC has reading comprehension problems.
Just in case you missed it AGAIN: Linux ALREADY has repositories. There is NOTHING to replace. The question is the OP is asking is "What do I need another repository for?"
Just to make it as clear as possible... because this seems to be a problem for some reason... he is asking what he would need ANOTHER repository for. Are we there yet?
The Russian people do indeed work, almost to the point of slavery, some may say. But like in most of the world, you don't really see that, you see the rich and uncaring assholes.
Copyright is concieved as a method to circumvent a "natural right". By that I mean, simply the fact that its a decision made by humans as to who can legaly recollect and regurgitate that information.
Copyleft, on the other hand, is specifically designed to circumvent all such circumventions as mentioned above, using the same law. It is effectively a reverse of the intended concept. Hence the use of the word 'left' (a silly pun, I admit). But... another "natural right" is being taken away here, as you are now bound by law to distribute the source under the same licence.
So the question is, what "natural right" is more important, and why? How many more dark ages do we need to get it through our thick collective skulls that hiding knowledge for the short term gain will enevetibly lead to the loss of the knowledge altogether?
"natural right" -- I'm referring to having the capacity to do something that normally, would not be concidered illegal. Things like reading or writing. I'm not speaking about stealing/killing/hurting... (actions that have very real consequences in the physical world), and I think that we can leave it at that and hope that we're on the same page of that topic.
Slashdot Mirror
Dunno about troll... I learned something from it. I'd say informative.
Flamebait? I actually meant what I said. Give him a break! There's no flaming going on here.
8 bucks an hour eh? Interesting perception. I think you tinkered with yourself too much.
Give him a break, he's probably Pharsi.
Ah... lol.
Causes??
Fair enough.
I'm not attacking you. I haven't even insulted you. I put up two quotes. One was supposed to be a reply to the first. I pointed out that it was simply not that. I am unsure why it is you think that I'm supposed to read your mind if your intended message was completely absent. If your concrete message is that it's more than a repository, then I find it curious that it came out only after your post had been desputed (several times, actually as I'm finding this out in your replys to me).
Also curious is how every single reply to you is along the same lines, and yet everyone else but you is wrong. Further more, you're consistenly insulting those that reply to you. The only one foaming at the mouth is you, and you're projecting it. I detect a hint of narcissism or extreeme immaturity due to young age. For your sake I hope it's the latter.
Be at peace, brother.
And yeah.. it's more than just a repo, it's a SUPER repo. Suddenly a different front-end changes the underlying concept?
You're the one stroking your cock here, going on personal rant and attacks, failing to respond to what is said, and adding nothing of actual value.
Thanks for the replies... I guess I live in a different world. Though I had never thought this redneck town knows more about anything than anyone.
History repeats itself. Nothing is learned.
The OP:
AC:
My conclusion: AC has reading comprehension problems.
Just in case you missed it AGAIN: Linux ALREADY has repositories. There is NOTHING to replace. The question is the OP is asking is "What do I need another repository for?"
Just to make it as clear as possible... because this seems to be a problem for some reason... he is asking what he would need ANOTHER repository for. Are we there yet?
How is it that they can comprehend car models then? Selective stupidity? (More like selective ignorance that we should NOT cater to)
Obviously :)
Thanks!!
The Russian people do indeed work, almost to the point of slavery, some may say. But like in most of the world, you don't really see that, you see the rich and uncaring assholes.
Not the other way around?
Not to mention that it's your body telling you to "STOP what you're and GO TO SLEEP FOR FUCK'S SAKE".
We do. They work.
As another russian, I find that funny.
Heh, I thought it was sad :).
Copyright is concieved as a method to circumvent a "natural right". By that I mean, simply the fact that its a decision made by humans as to who can legaly recollect and regurgitate that information.
Copyleft, on the other hand, is specifically designed to circumvent all such circumventions as mentioned above, using the same law. It is effectively a reverse of the intended concept. Hence the use of the word 'left' (a silly pun, I admit). But... another "natural right" is being taken away here, as you are now bound by law to distribute the source under the same licence.
So the question is, what "natural right" is more important, and why? How many more dark ages do we need to get it through our thick collective skulls that hiding knowledge for the short term gain will enevetibly lead to the loss of the knowledge altogether?
"natural right" -- I'm referring to having the capacity to do something that normally, would not be concidered illegal. Things like reading or writing. I'm not speaking about stealing/killing/hurting... (actions that have very real consequences in the physical world), and I think that we can leave it at that and hope that we're on the same page of that topic.
Same issue as ever, Pinky. People trying to take over the world.
Any insight as to why it's commonly referred to as "Copyleft"?
I concur. Great Read!