The Facebook service itself is largely a non-moral tool. Like a hammer.
There is no way to block "horrible" live streams other than blocking all livestreams.
So what he's saying is that other countries have an unfettered right to spy on the US with the same backdoors he'll put into the software. Because surely no one is beyond the lawful reach of (US/Russian/Chinese) right to investigate?
If the Post Office isn't a person for this purpose, than no corporation could challenge a patent. The Supremes aren't going to toss out corporate personhood over this.
33,000 people were killed by human driven cars in the US last year. Odds are, someone died in a human driven car while I was reading this article about the important of nostalgia.
If your revenue stream is imperilled by a completely legal and technically simple method of recording content, the obvious action is to sue everyone, and get the laws changed!
Next up - mandatory email filters to scan for copyright attachments, and your laptop mic will listen for songs being played so you can be charged a penny everytime you listen to copyright work.
Not soon enough. Every episode I've seen has been just awful, painting everyone in tech/science as an asshole. I haven't seen a funny episode, so obviously i am in the minority here.
Slashdot Mirror
The Facebook service itself is largely a non-moral tool. Like a hammer. There is no way to block "horrible" live streams other than blocking all livestreams.
So.... All of them were bogus, right?
So what he's saying is that other countries have an unfettered right to spy on the US with the same backdoors he'll put into the software. Because surely no one is beyond the lawful reach of (US/Russian/Chinese) right to investigate?
If the Post Office isn't a person for this purpose, than no corporation could challenge a patent. The Supremes aren't going to toss out corporate personhood over this.
33,000 people were killed by human driven cars in the US last year. Odds are, someone died in a human driven car while I was reading this article about the important of nostalgia.
If your revenue stream is imperilled by a completely legal and technically simple method of recording content, the obvious action is to sue everyone, and get the laws changed! Next up - mandatory email filters to scan for copyright attachments, and your laptop mic will listen for songs being played so you can be charged a penny everytime you listen to copyright work.
Not soon enough. Every episode I've seen has been just awful, painting everyone in tech/science as an asshole. I haven't seen a funny episode, so obviously i am in the minority here.
And articles are almost Never made better by an (autoplay) video. Just let me read what it has to say!
Why do we have to read about this kind of abuse on (the very good Register) in the UK? Why don't stories like this get domestic airtime?
Sounds good, until they patent "Expanding a wireless network by adding more access points" and sue anyone with more than one wireless router!