How some people get anything done, I know several people I can't have a 5 minute conversation with them with out there phone chirping, and that chirp, it's like Pavlov's bell, or perhaps a Pavlovian Gong be cause *nothing* is more important than the phone.
The worst part of this is when my phone chirps in the car I have this immediate desire to answer right then, really took me a while to learn how to just relax and wait. It's odd but sometimes people that are always on their phones seem like the phones bitch.
The entire thread is ridiculous, you can't "ban" someone from the Internet, yes you can put them in jail, but that isn't "banning" from the Internet that's "going to jail" of which a possible side effect would be "not able to access the internet" but still not "banned from the Internet".
So the answer is "no" you can't ban an individual from the Internet, it's still far to open of a system for that.
Conjuring up asshat answers like "prison" tells me that someone might need to spend less time on/. and more time re-evaluating what they are doing that "prison" comes to mind so easily.
Do you honestly think that slaughter was derived solely based on their race? Do you actual believe there were no other causative factors that were outstanding and drew attention?
That's the one thing you never here discussed in open, the why of it.
"Integer factorization is believed to be computationally infeasible with an ordinary computer for large integers if they are the product of few prime numbers (e.g., products of two 300-digit primes).[13] By comparison, a quantum computer could efficiently solve this problem using Shor's algorithm to find its factors. This ability would allow a quantum computer to decrypt many of the cryptographic systems in use today, in the sense that there would be a polynomial time (in the number of digits of the integer) algorithm for solving the problem. In particular, most of the popular public key ciphers are based on the difficulty of factoring integers (or the related discrete logarithm problem, which can also be solved by Shor's algorithm), including forms of RSA. These are used to protect secure Web pages, encrypted email, and many other types of data. Breaking these would have significant ramifications for electronic privacy and security."
As one disgruntled Wiki-PR employee is reported as writing: "The warning flag was when I was told not to mention Elance or work for hire." Those who work for Wiki-PR have indeed gone to extensive lengths to hide their activities on Wikipedia. This has included altering their habitual behavioral patterns, frequently changing their IP addresses (apparently to avoid being caught by the "checkuser" tool), and bypassing the normal gatekeeping process by which editors police new submissions to the English Wikipedia. One practice appears to exploit a loophole by creating a new page as a user subpage before moving it into the mainspace, where Wikipedia's regular articles are located. This "bug" was actually first reported in 2007 with the prescient warning: "creating articles in userspace before moving them into mainspace seems to me a sneaky way of avoiding scrutiny from newpage patrollers." Checkuser has also been sidestepped through the company's use of remote and freelance employees, who can operate from a large number of IP ranges.
How do you get rid of the scum and still keep it an open system?
In my opinion Wikipedia should be moved to a bunker in Iceland (yes it should also have multiple data stores around the World but edit-ably subservient to the one in Iceland) and only Wiki librarians of the highest order will be allowed to manipulate the pages.
Kind of like the Svalbard Global Seed Vault trying to save all the seeds from the likes of Monsanto.
How do you get banned from the Internet? It's literally impossible at this point in time. Of course if you have a Facebook account (and I wager you do) you're helping "them" to create exactly what you just said, a bannable Internet.
Adam "anything for a dollar" Masonbrink “We write it. We manage it. You never worry about Wikipedia again.“ Really? What were they worried about the truth?
So Adam wants to cash in on subverting one of greatest assets on the Inet. Show him how you feel about that.
Slashdot Mirror
How some people get anything done, I know several people I can't have a 5 minute conversation with them with out there phone chirping, and that chirp, it's like Pavlov's bell, or perhaps a Pavlovian Gong be cause *nothing* is more important than the phone.
The worst part of this is when my phone chirps in the car I have this immediate desire to answer right then, really took me a while to learn how to just relax and wait.
It's odd but sometimes people that are always on their phones seem like the phones bitch.
1/2 the fun.
The entire thread is ridiculous, you can't "ban" someone from the Internet, yes you can put them in jail, but that isn't "banning" from the Internet that's "going to jail" of which a possible side effect would be "not able to access the internet" but still not "banned from the Internet".
So the answer is "no" you can't ban an individual from the Internet, it's still far to open of a system for that.
Conjuring up asshat answers like "prison" tells me that someone might need to spend less time on /. and more time re-evaluating what they are doing that "prison" comes to mind so easily.
If all the kids can code you can get away with paying them minimum wage.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_in_prisons
Next!!!
"someone is being killing just for their race"
Do you honestly think that slaughter was derived solely based on their race?
Do you actual believe there were no other causative factors that were outstanding and drew attention?
That's the one thing you never here discussed in open, the why of it.
This stuff is a bit dense for me (or me for it) but wouldn't this be considered a biological neural net:
http://news.discovery.com/tech/robotics/brain-dish-flies-plane-041022.htm
Or did I completely misinterpret what you were saying in your comparison.
Would anyone in their sane state want this:
"Integer factorization is believed to be computationally infeasible with an ordinary computer for large integers if they are the product of few prime numbers (e.g., products of two 300-digit primes).[13] By comparison, a quantum computer could efficiently solve this problem using Shor's algorithm to find its factors. This ability would allow a quantum computer to decrypt many of the cryptographic systems in use today, in the sense that there would be a polynomial time (in the number of digits of the integer) algorithm for solving the problem. In particular, most of the popular public key ciphers are based on the difficulty of factoring integers (or the related discrete logarithm problem, which can also be solved by Shor's algorithm), including forms of RSA. These are used to protect secure Web pages, encrypted email, and many other types of data. Breaking these would have significant ramifications for electronic privacy and security."
LOL Pretty good, though i am reminded of the time in history when the French got a little carried away with their executions.
Explain to me how anyone will keep me (a individual) from using the Internet *today*, because it is *literally* impossible.
Why when I got exactly what I was after =)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2013-10-09/News_and_notes
As one disgruntled Wiki-PR employee is reported as writing: "The warning flag was when I was told not to mention Elance or work for hire." Those who work for Wiki-PR have indeed gone to extensive lengths to hide their activities on Wikipedia. This has included altering their habitual behavioral patterns, frequently changing their IP addresses (apparently to avoid being caught by the "checkuser" tool), and bypassing the normal gatekeeping process by which editors police new submissions to the English Wikipedia. One practice appears to exploit a loophole by creating a new page as a user subpage before moving it into the mainspace, where Wikipedia's regular articles are located. This "bug" was actually first reported in 2007 with the prescient warning: "creating articles in userspace before moving them into mainspace seems to me a sneaky way of avoiding scrutiny from newpage patrollers." Checkuser has also been sidestepped through the company's use of remote and freelance employees, who can operate from a large number of IP ranges.
How does what the US suffers from apply to the rest of the World?
Matthew 10:34
Put guillotine in there somewhere and Ill go along.
How do you get rid of the scum and still keep it an open system?
In my opinion Wikipedia should be moved to a bunker in Iceland (yes it should also have multiple data stores around the World but edit-ably subservient to the one in Iceland) and only Wiki librarians of the highest order will be allowed to manipulate the pages.
Kind of like the Svalbard Global Seed Vault trying to save all the seeds from the likes of Monsanto.
And why is it you only hear about the Jews hmmm?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
How do you get banned from the Internet? It's literally impossible at this point in time.
Of course if you have a Facebook account (and I wager you do) you're helping "them" to create exactly what you just said, a bannable Internet.
So STFU.
I will blame anyone obscuring the truth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki-PR
"this article may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion"
Lets all make an effort to not only keep the Wiki-PR article, but to include any *FACTS* we find that show what Adam is up to.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict-of-interest_editing_on_Wikipedia
You really need to see who it is trying to get the articles changed, some of the biggest criminals around.
Adam "anything for a dollar" Masonbrink
“We write it. We manage it. You never worry about Wikipedia again.“
Really?
What were they worried about the truth?
So Adam wants to cash in on subverting one of greatest assets on the Inet.
Show him how you feel about that.
"a new type of the extremely dangerous botulinum toxin, lurking in the feces of a child who displayed the symptoms of botulism"
Out of a kids turd, your cluelessness is now revealed to themWorld of /.
The worst of the worst will take office in 2016, Hillary Clinton.
Hence the never ending "pro female" rhetoric and propaganda oozing out of the usual outlets.
Miniature EMP.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/12/electropulse_grenades/
That they were actually concerned about this tells you everything you need to know about Dick and American politics.
They know they are criminals so they live in fear.
End of discussion.