Slashdot Mirror


Dick Cheney Had Implanted Defibrillator Altered To Prevent Terrorist Attack

An anonymous reader writes "According to the Washington Post, 'Former Vice President Dick Cheney says he once feared that terrorists could use the electrical device that had been implanted near his heart to kill him and had his doctor disable its wireless function. Cheney has a history of heart trouble, suffering the first of five heart attacks at age 37. ... In an interview with CBS' 60 Minutes, Cheney says doctors replaced an implanted defibrillator near his heart in 2007. The device can detect irregular heartbeats and control them with electrical jolts. Cheney says that he and his doctor, cardiologist Jonathan Reiner, turned off the device's wireless function in case a terrorist tried to send his heart a fatal shock.' More at CBS News."

242 comments

  1. Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 0

    Sometimes take extra precautions!

    News at 11.

    1. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Frankly, anyone who understands how insecure wireless is should be terrified of having a built in personal "off switch." I would do the same thing, and so would a lot of slashdot.

    2. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Frankly, anyone who understands how fragile the human body is should be terrified of walking outdoors, etc.

      Murders don't happen all the time simply because most people aren't psychopathic cunts. But, in Cheney's case, it takes one to know one.

    3. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by mellon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I think we have a pretty clear case of projection here. If a terrorist got close enough to him to hack his pacemaker, why not just stab him?

    4. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...most people aren't psychopathic cunts. But, in Cheney's case, it takes one to know one.

      But you claim to recognize Dick Cheney as one. Apparently that means you are a ....

    5. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      By attacking America on 9/11, Al Qaeda hoped to lure America into a foolish overreaction that would alienate the West from the Islamic world, weaken America's will, and help spread Al Qaeda's message of extremism and violence. Few people helped them achieve these goals more than Dick Cheney did. So why would they want to kill him?

    6. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 1

      Frankly, anyone who understands how insecure wireless is should be terrified of having a built in personal "off switch." I would do the same thing, and so would a lot of slashdot.

      I thought there was a story or two right here within the past year about this very vulnerability.

      --
      Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
    7. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      How close would a terrorist have to be? I mean antennas are great and you can hide them in other devices or out in the open and relay your cracking from a distance. That's the advantage of wireless isn't it.

      Imagine a scenario where a terrorist gets a hotel room in the same hotel he is staying at. Would the security detail turn off the house WIFI so I couldn't access his pace maker from the hotel's WIFI in my room or the lobby or something? What if he visits a company that has wifi and I have a remote connection into the building?

      perhaps we just aren't there yet, perhaps we already are.

      http://www.forbes.com/sites/singularity/2012/12/06/yes-you-can-hack-a-pacemaker-and-other-medical-devices-too/

    8. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Which 'they'?

      Cheney has managed to make quite a number of enemies over the years. No all of them live in the Middle East.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, but I'm a non-practising psychopathic cunt.

    10. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By attacking America on 9/11, Al Qaeda hoped to lure America into a foolish overreaction that would alienate the West from the Islamic world, weaken America's will, and help spread Al Qaeda's message of extremism and violence.

      Nah. Just like a lot of groups they seem to need a scapegoat to blame for their problems and the United States is that scapegoat. Bin Laden basically said that we're evil and responsible for all these problems, etc, and Bill Clinton had his cigar smoked in the oval office and that makes the whole country bad, blah, blah, blah.

      And there's at least one Imam that has suggested that the US's overreaction is proof that God disapproves of what Al Qaeda has done.

    11. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by nbauman · · Score: 5, Funny

      By attacking America on 9/11, Al Qaeda hoped to lure America into a foolish overreaction that would alienate the West from the Islamic world, weaken America's will, and help spread Al Qaeda's message of extremism and violence.

      Good thing we're too smart to fall for that.

    12. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correct. Pacemakers don't use wireless as in WiFi or Bluetooth. They use near field communications. It'd require a humongous coil to access it from more than a few inches.

    13. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares if wireless is insecure? You can fix it in the layer above. The device should drop packets that are not digitally signed by patient's doctor.

    14. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      Because it looks a lot more suspicious to drive a knife into someone's heart, than to press a button on your bluetooth headset which launches the attack code on your phone...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    15. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      IIRC the pacemakers have to be put in wireless configuration mode with a magnet placed in a specific spot on the pacemaker, so to hack one wirelessly would require physical access to him. It's not WIFI it's just wireless to prevent having to open him up to access the pacemaker, it still requires physical access.

    16. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by mrbester · · Score: 1

      The term you're looking for is "lapsed"

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    17. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Non-practicing"? You have no need to practice? So you've perfected your technique then?

      Enough with your boasting! You.. you...

    18. Re: Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      No. As a previous poster mentioned, the device has to be in very close proximity initially. However, in most ICD models once the heart device has been paired with whatever device is on the outside, communication can happen over a bit longer distances ( a few meters or so). Remember that these devices have batteries - they don't need coils. I have one, and it communicates with a receiver in my home when I'm around, allowing my cardiologist to be alerted if something odd happens with my heart rythm.

    19. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He obviously isn't an amateur. I think in his case the proper term would be "prolapsed". Oddly appropriate in his case.

    20. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have a pacemaker/defibrillator, and I really couldn't give a shit. Besides, my tech says that my model requires a magnetic field in order to pull a magnet inside the device and make a contact so that the wifi is turned on. Without someone sticking that round thing on my chest, no one can talk to the machine. Honestly if strange people go around putting heavy chunks of metal on my chest without my permission I think wifi is the least of my worries.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    21. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is quite clever of you! I couldn't have thought of that.

    22. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by milkmage · · Score: 4, Informative

      if his pacemaker is anything like the one my fried has, you basically have to touch his chest with another gizmo to see it.

      so wireless in the sense that there are no wires sticking out of his nipple... not AQ can kill him from an internet cafe in Pakistan.

      what's Cheney's IP? /duh.

    23. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you claim to recognize Dick Cheney as one. Apparently that means you are a ....

      So in your case it means it takes one to know two.
      Wait a minute...

    24. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if they leaned against you in a packed lift/subway train? Could have someone else flip the kill switch.

    25. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      I think the west was already alienated from the islamic world long before that. I mean look at the differences in customs there that we look at as barbaric, such as female circumcision and honor killings. Likewise, they view it as barbaric that we charge interest on loans and allow homosexuals to live (in fact these were two things Osama Bin Laden said he wanted to see end in America.)

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    26. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by delta98 · · Score: 1

      There is no "Off Switch". If there was there would be no Dick Cheny.

    27. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      Maybe West should be alienated from the Islamic world. The status quo seemed to be that as the rest of the world was progressing towards democratic governments, the Middle East (apart from Israel) would be the sole remaining black hole for democracy and human rights, run by a bunch of dictators like Saddam, Assad, Gaddafi, Mubarak etc, not to mention Taliban. Islamic world sucks in every department and maybe it's in our interest not to let it go on like that for the sake of few more years of peace.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    28. Re: Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 1

      So, how secure is the pairing? Bluetooth v2.1?

      Otherwise, someone could perhaps attack the pacemaker by spoofing an auth'd device.

      Also, a few meters is still a decent range, esp for a small concealed device that could lie in wait, and, surely that could be increased w/ more power...

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    29. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by johanw · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A terrorist? Someone who (tried to) kill Cheney would be a hero like Claus von Stauffenberg who tried to kill Hitler.

    30. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Murders don't happen all the time simply because most people aren't psychopathic cunts. But, in Cheney's case, it takes one to know one."

      Hahaha! I bet a lot of people are saying, "Why didn't I think of that?"

    31. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The status quo seemed to be that as the rest of the world was progressing towards democratic governments, the Middle East (apart from Israel) would be the sole remaining black hole for democracy and human rights

      If you truly believe that you reveal complete arrogance about the situation in the Middle East. First of all, Israel is conducting large scale state terrorism basically since it exists. Second, some of the worst dictators in the Middle East have been explicitly supported by the US government, some of them even rose to power with direct support by the CIA, and some of them are still being massively supported by the US. Take a look at Saudi Arabia. What currently happens in Egypt is yet another repetition of the same old story as well: The US is actively backing a "benevolent" military dictatorship by overthrowing a democratically elected government.

      I have no sympathy for regligious fundamentalism of any kind, but it really doesn't take rocket science to realize what is going on and why these terrorist movements could arise in the first place. Hint: They have not much to do with religion at all, the latter is nothing more than a recruiting tool for them.

      Also, it would perhaps also be a good idea to get a clue at the size the "islamic world" you're talking about, because you talk an awful lot as if it was confined to the Middle East.

      In summary, get a fucking idea what your talking about.

    32. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by CurryCamel · · Score: 1

      I mean look at the differences in customs there that we look at as barbaric, such as female circumcision and honor killings.

      (emphasis added)
      Anyone who condones chopping off (parts of) childrens penises I find barbaric, sadistic and and a bit perverse.
      I guess we too have alienated from "the west" long ago.

    33. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Where was this so-called attack by al Qaeda ever decided in a court of law, may one inquire?

    34. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware he even had a heart. I heard it had been replaced with a ten pound hammer.

    35. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by wijnands · · Score: 0

      Ask the guys in the Guantanamo Gulag, perhaps they know

    36. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by clarkkent09 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      First of all, Israel is conducting large scale state terrorism basically since it exists.
       
      Israel was granted its existence by the UN in 1947. The problem with Middle East is that Arabs have never been able to accept that because they don't like Jews. If Israeli Jews were Muslim, the problem wouldn't exist, simple as that. The expansion of Israel's territory since then came in my view in a fair way, as they won one after another defensive war against attacks by vastly superior Arab forces.
       
        Second, some of the worst dictators in the Middle East have been explicitly supported by the US government
       
      So what. It was right to support them when it suited our interest and there was a greater danger to us and to the word to worry about (USSR - the most evil empire in the 20th century). As far as I'm concerned, dictators are a fair game to support or to depose according to our interests and once we defeated the Soviet Union, we are now knocking them out one by one. Saudi royal family has a special deal with the US that temporarily keeps them in power because of oil but as soon as that reason is behind us they will be next in line.
       
        Also, it would perhaps also be a good idea to get a clue at the size the "islamic world" you're talking about, because you talk an awful lot as if it was confined to the Middle East.
       
      And it would be a good idea for you to get some perspective of what a total failure Islamic civilization has been. There is no progress at all of any kind, technological, political or otherwise that happened in any Muslim country in hundreds of years. 2 Nobel Prizes in science by Muslims compared to over 100 by Jews! The best university in any Islamic country (in Turkey, among the least Islamic of the Muslim countries) is not even in the top 200 in the world. Democracy has either failed or been under attack by Islamists in just about every Muslim country. Every border where Islamic civilization meets a non-Islamic one there is trouble, just look at the world map. Israel has shown how to turn a backward desert wasteland into an advanced 1st world country in less than 50 years. Why can't any Muslim country do the same? I think it is obvious to anyone but Western cultural relativists that the reason is Islam.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    37. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      In the article, the doctor said it could happen from a nearby hotel room, for example.

      Someone heard about this, because they did exactly this thing on Homeland last year, killed the VP by wirelessly hacking his pacemaker.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    38. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple.
      Because they are terrorists, and that's what terrorists do.

    39. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you recognize that he recognizes .... and I recognize that you recognize that .... Hmmm, that means it's pschopathic cunts all the way down.

    40. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did Cheney "off" hacker Barnaby Jack before he could reveal how others could "off" Cheney?

      http://www.reddit.com/r/conspiro/comments/1osmpd/dick_cheney_admits_he_disabled_wifibarnaby_jack/

    41. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That this was modded up boggles the mind. Maybe because the terrorist can walk past him with the signal being sent from a cellphone in his pocket? Maybe the terrorist wouldn't send a "fatal shock" but to shut the pacemaker down or change it so it doesn't instakill. Depending on the patient, a pacemaker isn't needed for every minute of the day. Cheney may not recognize there is a problem for days or weeks. Even if he died nearly instantly it could take months to prove it was an intentional failure, the guy has had 5 heart attacks already. The individual terrorist could get away and a terrorist group could claim credit for attack. Do you think all terrorists want to be martyrs?

    42. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This. Sounds like Dick Cheney has a brain. It's weird how non-techie people are extremely into lots of things they consider 'computer stuff', while the majority of geeks stay well away from them because they don't think it's worth the trade off e.g. facebook

    43. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Forthan+Red · · Score: 2

      Sources report that the IP address was 666.666.666.666.

    44. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by MrEdofCourse · · Score: 1

      But couldn't someone from a distance have used a super strong magnet to turn the radio on and then from a distance transmit the "off" signal?

      I'm not talking about someone doing this from another country, but perhaps near enough where Cheney would've have been.

      It seems like there was enough of a possible threat that he, and his doctors, felt the need to do this.

    45. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because nobody could ever, ever, ever copy the key used for digital signing.

    46. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      I gotta wonder what kind of shit Pope Jon Paul II was up to...

    47. Re: Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with most of that post. However, if the Israeli Jews were Muslim, it would solve nothing. That is a source of conflict right now. But nobody likes the Palestinians either. And what sect of Muslim makes all the others happy? Did Pakistan and India have issues over the Jews? Iran and Iraq? That area has throughout all history been ripe with conflict, and will be for the foreseeable future.

    48. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by asmkm22 · · Score: 1

      I think you're giving too much credit to the terrorists here. 9/11 was just one of many attempts at flying planes into buildings, and the only one that worked. There was no long-con involved. They weren't thinking 3 steps ahead while anticipating our next moves. They just wanted to bring down one of the symbols of American capitalism with the added benefit of killing as many people as possible.

      We screwed up after the fact, but the mistake was ours alone. Not some terrorist mastermind predicting the future.

    49. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1, Informative

      female circumcision

      Female genital mutilation (FGM) is not an Islamic custom. It is an African custom. In the areas where it occurs, it is practiced by both muslims and non-muslims, and was widely practiced before the Islamic era. Most muslims live in Asia, not Africa, and do not practice FGM. The practice is not mentioned in either the Bible or the Koran, nearly all Islamic scholars agree that there is nothing "Islamic" about it, and it is illegal in most Islamic countries.

    50. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      How close? About three metres with the medical equipment, more I suppose if they have a large antenna, but they'd have to have cracked whatever RSA was putting on those things since the 1990s first.
      With respect to Forbes it's not their usual line of reporting so I'm expecting a junk "flying cars" article.

    51. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      That's all assuming that the wireless in the pacemaker has been left on, which of course uses a lot of battery power so is unlikely - see other posts about how it is turned on and off.
      I expect Cheney has misunderstood the situation and didn't know that the wireless connection gets turned off while he's in the doctors office.

    52. Re: Evil, powerful men have enemies. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I met someone from RSA that was working on encryption for them in the 1990s. So I'd say at least one brand is fairly secure if not all.

    53. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      That's not just "strong", that's inside an MRI machine strong.

    54. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's not really fair to dump those things on a religion just as it's not fair to dump Jim Jones, Charlie Manson and Jimmy Swaggart on our own. Those things are done in the name of a religion while really it's about perverted shits that like women to have mutilated genitals or generally evil bastards looking for an excuse to kill their ex. It's barbarism with the excuse of religion but the barbarism is not in all places where that religion is practised.

    55. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by mellon · · Score: 1

      Terrorists aren't that subtle. They like to be able to take credit for what they have done. If Cheney dies of a heart attack, it's just a heart attack, not an attack. No terror. The person terrorizing Cheney was Cheney, pure and simple.

    56. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the case with older pm/icd's; the magnet operated a reed switch. The newer ones can communicate without that ...

    57. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Probably the same one that decided the attack on Pearl Harbor by Japan.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    58. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Prior to the 9/11 attacks Bin Laden was the head of the al Qaida state within a state in the very model of Islamic state, Taliban run Afghanistan, that he hoped to see spread around the world. His terrorist training camps were turning out thousands of trained terrorists per year with recruits of all races coming from around the world to learn their deadly lessons and return home to spread the Jihad. The world continued to slumber while he built up his forces and spread the poison of their ideology. In reaction to 9/11 he expected more cruise missiles as had occurred under President Clinton, and which had proven ineffective. Instead what he got was a Western alliance galvanized into action, an invasion that removed the Taliban from power, destroyed his training camps, devastated his base of terrorist fighters, choked off much of his funding, forced his sponsors in Pakistan to engage in combat against al Qaida and its allies, even if only half-heartedly, and caused his followers to flee like rats to hide in the dark. When they tried to regroup and confront the US in Iraq, they did even worse damage to themselves. They lost large numbers of fighters, exposed their funding sources to attack, and demonstrated to the Arab and Muslim world that they were blood thirsty and cruel thugs that were as happy killing Muslims as anybody. As a result of their conduct in Iraq they lost massive amounts of support in the Muslim world. All during this time their leadership was being hunted down by special forces and drones and killed or captured. Bin Laden was reduced to little more than a figurehead hiding in Pakistan. He died like a bandit in hiding, doing little more than writing letters to try to rework his failing strategy, and watching porn. I don't think it worked out the way he thought it would.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    59. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Only to those in the fever swamps.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    60. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Few people helped them achieve these goals more than Dick Cheney did. So why would they want to kill him?

      Because they ultimately failed. When your leader is reduced to hiding in a walled in compound, writing letters and watching porn, you're probably not on the path to success.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    61. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How close would a terrorist have to be?

      A lot closer than you'd need to be with a bomb, a pistol, or a rifle.

    62. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      The people that want Cheney dead in the Western world are pretty much limited to mainly committed leftists, and maybe some extreme fringe libertarian types. Probably not much more than that.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    63. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you squint any harder, to distort things to that kind of view, your eyes will burst.

    64. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by nbauman · · Score: 1

      So how come I have to take off my shoes to get on a plane in the airport?

    65. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      A bomb, pistol, or riffle can be detected more readily then a hacked mobile phone running custom code or the hotel's wifi signal which purposely entered the room they are in.

      However, I have been informed that ordinarily, to use the wifi, you have to pass a magnet of certain stength over the device within a certain distance from it. At that time, a small signal can be detected which limits the range the programming device can be from the person. I hope that is true in all situations. On the linked article, they talked about a security researcher who was able to hack a pacemaker from 50 feet away. That is doable with a modified cell phone I would think.

    66. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a shame there is no real Hell to send him to.

      Amen to that. Along with Thatcher.

    67. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is all sixes.

    68. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Is that the best you've got? Do you really need me to tell you?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    69. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

      Particularly when the assault would look to observers exactly like a heart attack, of a man who has heart disease. As opposed to looking like a bloody knife sticking out of his chest.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    70. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which should give you an idea of the sort of people Cheney really feared.

    71. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Islamic world" is not just the Middle East. It extends through Africa, across south-east Europe, across Asia, into Indonesia. It involves at least a billion Muslims, but shares a space with at least another billion non-Muslims. And the Wahhabists, the religion of Al Qa'ida, are an aggressively proselyting, expanding faction of Islam. They do not remain, therefore it is not sufficient to simply walk away.

    72. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Bayoudegradeable · · Score: 2

      The problem with Middle East is that Arabs have never been able to accept that because they don't like Jews.

      So utterly wrong. It's all about LAND and it being taken from the Palestinians. Taking land from one group and giving it to another tends to make the locals mad.

      --
      Sig Registration Form 34c_766(a) submitted to Ministry of Signature Management. Approval pending.
    73. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "United States vs Zacarias Moussaoui"?

    74. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      No, any compatible ICD "programmer" from a cardiac hospital would work. They use keys for handshaking, but at the manufacturer/model level, not the doctor/patient level.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    75. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dick Cheney has a brain. The problem is with his "heart".

    76. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The individual terrorist could get away and a terrorist group could claim credit for attack.

      You're trying to defend your shallow comment. Step up your thinking.

    77. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      Could you please cite the figure of "thousands per year" coming out of the Afghanistan training camps?

    78. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Hentes · · Score: 1

      Murders don't happen all the time because they have severe consequences. But in this case, catching the murderer would be very hard.

    79. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you getting paid to post?

      I mean, it's obvious that you are, but it would be nice to see you either confirm it or lie about it.

      Either way, cold fjord, you - as a provider of information - have zero credibility.

      And that's sad, since *some* of the information you post is correct and at times even interesting.

    80. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Israel was granted its existence by the UN in 1947

      So? That makes it ok? The Arab countries didn't recognize the right of the UN to steal land and give it to others and I'm not sure why they should have. That's not a power the UN should have.

      That being said, Israelis have had the land long enough that their claims over it are vastly stronger than anyone else's. It was BS to give them the land back in the 40s because I give no value to their ancestors having the land, just as today I hold the Arab/Islamic claims today in little regard because 70 years ago someone else had the land. The same rationale works both ways.

    81. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      so-called attack by al Qaeda

      Eh?

      Am I feeding a truther?

    82. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      I think you're giving too much credit to the terrorists here. 9/11 was just one of many attempts at flying planes into buildings, and the only one that worked. There was no long-con involved. They weren't thinking 3 steps ahead while anticipating our next moves. They just wanted to bring down one of the symbols of American capitalism with the added benefit of killing as many people as possible.

      We screwed up after the fact, but the mistake was ours alone. Not some terrorist mastermind predicting the future.

      Osama Bin Laden's stated goal, from his writings many years ago, was to bankrupt Western nations (the United States in particular) by forcing them to put resources into terrorism suppression, with the ultimate goal of getting Western troops out of Islamic countries.

      He was trying to put in place a Xanatos Gambit, where one of his major aims would be achieved whichever path we chose. If we poured enough resources into anti-terrorism methods/wars we bankrupted ourselves, we'd have to pull out of the Islamic countries, which was his highest goal. If we stayed financially strong but got hit with terrorist attack after attack, eventually the political pressure would force us either to pull out (fulfilling Al Qaeda's demands) or else pour resources into anti-terrorism methods/wars, bankrupting ourselves. He wins again.

      He didn't really anticipate the US would be able to successfully play the "we'll fight them over there so we don't have to fight them over here" game, nor that drone strikes, invasions, intelligence, et all, would be able to take out enough Al Qaeda command to cripple the organization (and similar organizations). If you listen to the Tea Party, we're bankrupting ourselves already, so who knows what the end result of all of this will be.

    83. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Because they ultimately failed. When your leader is reduced to hiding in a walled in compound, writing letters and watching porn, you're probably not on the path to success.

      I'm not sure if it's that easy. It was not really what he could do, it was what he was able to make us do. That was the goal, and we played along, but probably not with the results that he expected.

    84. Re:Evil, powerful men have enemies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the subtle beauty of the hymen.

  2. Terrorist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How can anyone who kills Dick Cheney be a terrorist?

    1. Re:Terrorist? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      It's Dick Cheney - that person paying for a pack of gum with pennies is a terrorist.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Terrorist? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Terror is a strategy, not a value judgment.

      Don't let the propagandists redefine words to suit their purposes.

      I'd much rather be terrorised from time to time - indeed, England was for quite a while, and my father almost got killed in one bomb blast - than be aerial bombarded back to the Middle Ages.

    3. Re:Terrorist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes me happy to think he was afraid of that. Live in fear, yeah, just what he deserves. Watch out for that microwave oven!!

    4. Re:Terrorist? by mellon · · Score: 1

      A->B != B->A. Just because someone kills Dick Cheney doesn't mean they are not a terrorist.

    5. Re:Terrorist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone that killed Hitler would've been considered a hero. Isn't this the same thing?

      -- green led

    6. Re: Terrorist? by tysonedwards · · Score: 1

      To Germany, might the assassination of their leader not be an act that causes some of their population to feel terror?

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
    7. Re:Terrorist? by geirlk · · Score: 1

      Eva Braun might disagree.

    8. Re: Terrorist? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Mandela's an even greyer area: many South African whites really did fear the black majority - indeed, they worried about being treated not unlike Mugabe has treated white farmers, and then some - so they ended up oppressing (with some terroristic behaviour) the blacks. Mandela responded with an ANC which wasn't wholly opposed to similarly violent action. Locked up for a few decades, the wise old man realises that, while the racist policy was obviously wrong, everyone ended up engaging in nastiness to protect what they perceived as their threatened interests - the only way forward was to accept sincere apologies.

    9. Re:Terrorist? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'd be too if his fear to be killed didn't result in the lot of us having to live with ridiculous limitations.

      I'd say give the terrorists a fighting chance and leave us alone!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Terrorist? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. The probably WORST thing that could have happened during WW2 was that Hitler got assassinated before the end of the war. We'd have had to relive the legend of WW1, that Germany wasn't beaten but just betrayed, the stab-in-the-back myth would just have gotten a new theme: "If it hadn't been for that assassin, the Führer could certainly have turned the tide of the battle with his genius".

      And the whole crap would have continued a few years later again.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:Terrorist? by couchslug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Precisely. There is only "war" of different kinds and at varying levels.

      "Terror" is pretty effective though. Nations which lose hundreds of thousands of dead and maimed to socially acceptable causes (smoking, obesity, auto crashes) can easily be terrified into implementing structurally toxic changes by the trivial loss of a few thousand killed in one small location. I wouldn't want to be under a massive bombardment either, but once upon a time nations knew they could take massive casualties yet not only survive but triumph.

      Give the Mamayev Kurgan monument some thought. Stalingrad cost more Soviet dead than the US lost in all its wars, but they refused to lose. Commies or not, they had balls.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    12. Re:Terrorist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Very true. But, value judgements aside, the question still stands as assassinating one of the people most likely to be assassinated by a method that leaves no collateral damage and the vast majority would be completely immune to anyway is about the furthest any kind of homicide can possibly be from a terror strategy. Either he's assuming that nobody who isn't a also terrorist would want to do him in, he's simply using the word "terrorist" as a descriptor for all his enemies (except maybe political rivals, but who knows) regardless of their strategy.

    13. Re:Terrorist? by Skiron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Stalingrad cost more Soviet dead than the US lost in all its wars, but they refused to lose. Commies or not, they had balls.

      Well, in essence, it was Hitler's fault. The original plan was to take the Ural oil fields and the German machine was unstoppable it doing it - until Hitler decided on a detour to take Stalingrad on the way (he thought it would destroy the Russian hearts and resistance) ~ bad move.

      If he didn't do the detour, I think the outcome of WWII would have been different.

      Mind you, that doesn't take away what the people of Stalingrad did to resist and destroy the German eastern front.

    14. Re: Terrorist? by Skiron · · Score: 2

      Did you know Mugabe spelt backwards is: 'E, Ba Gum' frequently heard in the North of England

    15. Re:Terrorist? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed: such a targetted attack would only be "terrorism" when the word is redefined by propagandists.

    16. Re:Terrorist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great comment, although total US war dead is 1.3mil and Stalingrad cost the Russians 1.15mil men. Though if we exclude the US Civil War, you're correct.

    17. Re: Terrorist? by Zemran · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mandella really was a terrorist. He was arrested while in the possession of 48,000 Soviet-made anti-personnel mines, 210,000 hand-grenades and loads of other explosives. He was blowing shit up and was about to blow up the railway station. He was sent to prison and frequently offered release if he would renounce terrorism. He consistently refused. His wife of the time used to like to tie children to street lamps and put car tyres around their necks which she then filled with petrol and set the poor child alight.

      He had a change of heart and became a man of peace. Would Bin Laden have been so readily forgiven?

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    18. Re:Terrorist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well even Hitler doesn't like Cheney : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35hEDhMvDIg

    19. Re:Terrorist? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      And the whole crap would have continued a few years later again.

      Not likely. The existence of nuclear weapons prevents World War III from happening. That wouldn't have changed if Hitler had been taken out and WW2 ended earlier. Absent the pressures of total war they might have taken longer to be developed but it still would have happened. Deterrence works, even with madmen like Hitler, as evidenced by his refusal to employ chemical weapons. Ditto in the Pacific, the Japanese used them in China, a country that couldn't respond in kind, but declined to use them against the Allies that could.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    20. Re: Terrorist? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      Well, be precise: re necklacing, making an indirect endorsement ("we shall liberate this country with our boxes of matches and our necklaces") isn't the same as "liking" to do something yourself against children - and the ANC officially condemned the practice.

      However, the thrust of your message is sound, and to answer your question: no, OBL stopped being readily forgiven the moment he stopped working for US interests. OBL was a terrorist in the strategic and the PR senses, while Mandela was a terrorist in the strategic sense but "freedom fighter" in the PR sense. In this precisely sense, he was in a grey area.

    21. Re: Terrorist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was carrying around tons of explosive all by himself? I guess they must have locked him up in a jail made out of Kryptonite and Adamantium.

    22. Re:Terrorist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank you

    23. Re:Terrorist? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      "Terrorism" is what we call a smaller force intelligently fighting back against a much stronger force without just getting pasted. It's the only method of fighting available with their resources at that point.

  3. Breaking News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Breaking News : Dick Cheney has a heart !

    1. Re:Breaking News by mellon · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it's broken. That's what turned Darth Vader evil too.

    2. Re:Breaking News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a Wizard of Oz administration. Guess who the Scarecrow is.

    3. Re:Breaking News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well played, sir!

    4. Re:Breaking News by Greg01851 · · Score: 1

      I dunno George, who is the Scarecrow? Wait a minute... I'M George!

    5. Re:Breaking News by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It can't be disabled easily by a terrorist though. This is because the Cheney heart was removed, placed in a mason jar, and buried in the yard behind a house that was built on top of an old Indian burial ground, in the middle of Texas where terrorists aren't allowed to go.

    6. Re:Breaking News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Doctors now have proof that the source of human compassion is not containing within a muscular pump in the human chest."

  4. First thing that came to mind.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BOQI-LAEzM

  5. homeland by etash · · Score: 0

    comes to mind with the vice president's ( the "walking dude" aka randall flagg actor from stephen king's "the stand" ) murder in the same way.

  6. Extra Extra! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Extra Extra!
    Read all about it!
    Dick Cheney revealed to have a heart!
    Progressives outraged over use of resources!

  7. Yeah, I guess that seems like a sensible move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What else are we supposed to say here, other than "yeah, if I were basically running a country with lots of enemies, I would also not allow wireless access to my pacemaker"?

  8. What does he need the defibrillator for? by jopet · · Score: 1

    Since, clearly, he does not have a heart.

  9. Dick Cheney's got a heart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Citation needed.

  10. But in everyone else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But in everyone else it's turned on? If it's an acknowledged attack vector, then why?

    1. Re:But in everyone else by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      The same reason all acknowledged attack vectors are left open: Convenience and carelessness.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  11. NCIS episode inspiration? by DreamMaster · · Score: 1

    Hmm.. I wonder if this wasn't the inspiration of the previous season's NCIS episode "Need to Know" where the victim was killed in exactly that manner.

  12. Dick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't people in USA use it as slang for a male body part? lol ok, I'm immature. i haven't heard that name before. sorry. mods, you can hide this comment if you want :p

    1. Re:Dick? by Barefoot+Monkey · · Score: 1

      It's a common nickname for "Richard", and predates the slang by quite a bit. In fact, the whole reason "dick" is used to refer to a boy-part is because it is such a common and well-established boy-name. The names "Willie" and "Fanny" came to be used for "penis" and "vagina" for the exact same reason (although the latter is used slightly differently in the US).

    2. Re:Dick? by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      Any Cockney will tell you a "Richard" is something else entirely.

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    3. Re:Dick? by Skiron · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's specific to cockney, just generic rhyming slang in England. It's all gone 'Pete Tong', I'm going for a 'Ruby {Murray}' type thing.

    4. Re:Dick? by Barefoot+Monkey · · Score: 1

      What's a "Richard" in Cockney slang?

    5. Re:Dick? by Grumpinuts · · Score: 1

      Richard the Third = Turd (Shit)

    6. Re:Dick? by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      Oooh! Like Johnson.

  13. Paranoid? Nope, he's merely one noid. by waddgodd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Okay, given Cheney's historical level of paranoia (this is nothing compared to some of his hijinks as SECNAV), I can TOTALLY see Cheney not understanding something and therefore assuming it's going to be used by people out to get him. Both "not understanding something" and "worried about trivial crap" are WELL within Cheney's persona. Having said that, whose wise idea was it to make a defibrilator that can be remotely accessed wirelessly in the first place? If nerd history has taught us anything, it's vulnerable shit eventually gets broken into, and wireless protocols are by definition vulnerable.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you
  14. skr1pt k1dd13 h4x0rs is a real risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is not paranoia when even a script kiddie would want to kill you, half the world would like it, and you have a Industry-Standard-Security-Class device that keeps you alive.

    He'd be dead already, someone would have flooded the black market with a "pacemaker-be-gone" device akin to the tv-be-gone ones already.

  15. It's a weird experience by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My sis has an implanted defibrillator. It's a weird experience to be sitting in a doctors office when a technician comes in with a machine to test the installation.

    "I just need to turn up your blood pressure and heart rate for a minute" says the tech, as casually as ordering a cup of coffee.

    A couple of button presses later, the look of shock on my sister's face as she realized that she was not, in a very literal sense, in control of her own heart is something I'll never forget.

    She needs her implanted defibrillator but, holy shit, the power she must cede to Miss Random Device Technician by having it in her body is scary as all hell.

    1. Re:It's a weird experience by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you crinkle in fear each time a car comes at you from the opposite direction? Every time you get on a plane?

      Lots of potentially dangerous actions in your life, many other people can terminate it accidentally or on purpose. Hell, that dodgy iPhone charger you bought off of eBay - do you really trust it?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:It's a weird experience by mysidia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you crinkle in fear each time a car comes at you from the opposite direction? Every time you get on a plane?

      Lots of potentially dangerous actions in your life, many other people can terminate it accidentally or on purpose.

      At least if a car going the opposite direction crashes into you, or the airplane pilot crashes the plane their life and property is in serious jeapordy as well.

    3. Re:It's a weird experience by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was being specific, not general. Here's what I mean -

      Do you crinkle in fear each time a car comes at you from the opposite direction?

      I'm sure I was quite afraid the first time I drove. However, I quickly learned that the danger was minimal, there were postive steps I could take to minimize it, and if something did go horribly wrong there was only a vanishingly small chance that someone was deliberately causing a problem. I got used to it, obviously, since they don't bother me now. I don't remember exactly, but I feel sure I actually got used to it before I finished my first drive.

      I understand that all of life is potentially dangerous. That was not my point.

      Prior to the implanted defibrillator, my sis had a pacemaker. It was just under the skin and checking it required placing an electronic puck of some sort directly on the skin over the pacemaker. That was how it was connected to a testing console. Making changes to the way it worked was a bit complicated, took some time, and required the cooperation of the patient (at minimum, to just sit there and let the work happen).

      The defibrillator was very different. There was no puck and it could be accessed from a vastly greater distance. Also, the technician could instantly, with a few keystrokes, turn my sister's heart up or down whether my sister was cooperating or not. In my first post, I was relating that this was the first time we realized that the implanted defibrillator required her to trust her life to a technology that could be so easily abused. Now that she's gone through it, she accepts the risk.

      However, it's a case of believing "I'm not a target/security through obscurity" that allows her to accept this situation. She really is completely defenseless against anyone close by who can send the right wireless signals. She accepts the risk in exchange for the rewards but the initial shock at realizing the risk existed (and having it so clearly, offhandedly demonstrated) was NOT unjustified. I feel sure that if she were a public person like Cheney, she, too, would have wanted wireless access disabled.

    4. Re:It's a weird experience by rwyoder · · Score: 1

      My sis has an implanted defibrillator. It's a weird experience to be sitting in a doctors office when a technician comes in with a machine to test the installation.

      "I just need to turn up your blood pressure and heart rate for a minute" says the tech, as casually as ordering a cup of coffee.

      A couple of button presses later, the look of shock on my sister's face as she realized that she was not, in a very literal sense, in control of her own heart is something I'll never forget.

      She needs her implanted defibrillator but, holy shit, the power she must cede to Miss Random Device Technician by having it in her body is scary as all hell.

      You are describing a *pacemaker*, not a defibrillator.

      A defibrillator does nothing unless it detects the heart has gone into V-fib, then it applies a shock which momentarily stops the heart, enabling the heart to reset its self back to normal rhythm.

    5. Re:It's a weird experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are describing a *pacemaker*, not a defibrillator.

      A defibrillator does nothing unless it detects the heart has gone into V-fib, then it applies a shock which momentarily stops the heart, enabling the heart to reset its self back to normal rhythm.

      Maybe the old ones. Most new ICD (implantable cardiac defibrillator) function as pacemakers also.

    6. Re:It's a weird experience by spitzak · · Score: 1

      Do you crinkle in fear each time a car comes at you from the opposite direction?

      Every time I drive in England, yes.

    7. Re:It's a weird experience by argStyopa · · Score: 2

      Of course, you don't have control over your heart ANYWAY (which, Darwin decided long ago, is probably the best way).

      Seriously, I can raise your pulse rate and blood pressure or heart rate remotely:
      (for those attracted to boobs!): http://acidcow.com/pics/20131017/gifs_01.gif (pg-13) or http://www.everyjoe.com/wp-content/gallery/bouncing-breasts/bouncing-boobs-gif-17.gif (pg-13 since acidcow is down? but really, the first one is better)
      (for those attracted to !boobs): http://25.media.tumblr.com/46b3d32d263012017bfc5c0ba3855997/tumblr_msk9sei9vj1rgbkzjo1_500.gif (g-rated)

      See how easy that was?

      Hell, I daresay if you're male and you've been through puberty, you pretty much come to terms with all sorts of parts of your body not being under the slightest bit of control...and hell they take over OTHER parts.

      --
      -Styopa
    8. Re:It's a weird experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...jeapordy...

      Good god, man! That's such a poor spelling of the word jeopardy that I've actually forgotten how to correctly spell it!

    9. Re:It's a weird experience by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Good god, man! That's such a poor spelling of the word jeopardy that I've actually forgotten how to correctly spell it!

      Please don't midn my tendency to sometimes sawp lettres around or type them out of order.

  16. He's got the heart of an 18 year-old! by Ihlosi · · Score: 2

    He keeps it in a jar on his desk.

    1. Re:He's got the heart of an 18 year-old! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the jar filled with dirt?

  17. But did he... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was smart of him to turn off the wireless. I don't think anyone can claim he is less than brilliant at whatever he does. The question that I'd like to know is if he had his bodyguards carry a dedicated detector that would alert if that particular signal was observed in his presence?

  18. So that's why I couldn't get an ssh console. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It turns out he is doing much better. It turns out that all he needed was the blood of a young boy. I believe the donor was Iraqi. Some weird O-Negative glycoprotein subtype.

    PS This is a joke. Because I know THEY are watching.

  19. Bad thing about advancements in medical technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The lifespans of these rich, elitist assholes are artificially prolonged.

  20. Known issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I work in this field. Three or four years ago when all the big device companies launched their remote interrogation capabilities, I asked around at the biggest industry conference (HRS) about device security. The answer (when it wasn't "security?") was "oh, you'd need a programmer" (the laptop-like devices used to interrogate implanted defibrillators and pacemakers). Walk down the right hall in a hospital with scrubs or a white coat on and grab one and you're set, not to mention reverse engineering. I hope they're improving the security with this kind of publicity.

  21. Re:Paranoid? Nope, he's merely one noid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you often need to tweak the settings or download logs. You really wouldnt want to have your skin cut open every time for that, right? Besides, it's wireless as in near field communications. You need to be really, really close. Inches away.

  22. Will not happen by Nephrite · · Score: 2

    Killing a politician with subtle electronic sabotage is not appealing to terrorists. It is not dramatic. It is quiet. Terrorists would rather blow a city block with TNT to kill a politician. Killing somebody using defibrillator suits spies or other government agents.

    1. Re:Will not happen by mbone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Killing a politician with subtle electronic sabotage is not appealing to terrorists. It is not dramatic. It is quiet. Terrorists would rather blow a city block with TNT to kill a politician. Killing somebody using defibrillator suits spies or other government agents.

      And my guess is that that is what he was really worried about.

    2. Re:Will not happen by couchslug · · Score: 1

      That was Old School terror designed to target proles who are the equivalent of Star Trek redshirts. It works, but the elites don't fear it and in the case of 9/11 even exploit it!

      New School, like the brilliant whacking of Alfred Herrhausen by a precision explosive charge or US drone attacks, reaches out to specific high-value targets. For those specific targets the threat is real and coerces them to defend against it. Such attacks don't require an attacker be on the scene making them a logical way to go. Someone wanting to manipulate a pacemaker could put a remotely activated device in, for example, an ordinary looking large plastic electrical enclosure, attach it to a streetlamp or hide it any number of ways, then wait for the target to come in range. It could stay dormant for a long time, even years if power was tapped from a steady source.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:Will not happen by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Brilliantly and most logically articulated, good citizen Nephrite! Are you related to Sherlock Holmes or Batman? Seriously, great comment!

    4. Re:Will not happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you're willing to bet someone else's life on that, but would you bet your own?

    5. Re:Will not happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      set it up high enough and the politicians head would literally explode scanners style. that would fit the bill for a terrorist.

  23. Danger still there by naasking · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Disabling wifi doesn't remove the danger. Directed energy weapons, like RF guns, can still target and disrupt the device in various ways since it contains electronics.

    1. Re:Danger still there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At which point, a device able to put out sufficient RF to get a kill is as discrete as brandishing a crowbar and yelling Allahu akbar, while rushing towards the well guarded Mr Cheney.

    2. Re:Danger still there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was hoping I wasn't the only one thinking EMP.

      A friend of mine has a similar implant. Wonder if he'd volunteer or testing a small scale EMP gun :)

  24. Re:Bad thing about advancements in medical technol by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    It's going to get worse too. I think the movie In Time gives a good idea of what would happen if life extension became trivially cheap and easy for anyone to have. "Life credits" would have to be used to cap-and-trade lifespans, and then guess what...

    I hope all the companies working on life extension know what they're playing with.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  25. Dick by GrahamJ · · Score: 0

    Finally, an aptly named politician.

  26. Ripped from the headlines ... or the reverse! by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Cheyney obviously watches Homeland, in which the Vice President is killed by remotely acessing his pacemaker.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Ripped from the headlines ... or the reverse! by sudon't · · Score: 1

      Haha! My first thought was: Was this before, or after, watching Homeland? That said, even I wouldn't want anything that critical hooked up to the net. These people with their alarm systems, home controls, etc., connected to the net are just asking for it.

      --
      -- sudon't

      Air-ride Equipped

  27. Terrorists, ha! by mbone · · Score: 1

    Based on his history it seems more likely that he was worried that the "organs of state security," or even some of his corporate sponsors, might do this to him, to make sure that various secrets stayed, well, secret.

  28. Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's more machine now, than man. His mind is twisted and evil...

  29. Re:Bad thing about advancements in medical technol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, we could suddenly all turn into homicidal maniacs who want to kill people who don't have enough life credits. Could happen. More likely we would limit everyone to 1 child (so 1 child per 2 people - a man and a woman). That way, no one has to be killed for running out of life credits, everyone can still have a child and a grand child and there will not be overpopulation. There will be no new people after log_2(n) generations. Since people still die from accidents, we'd in fact need to get people to have more than 1 child - people could have 1 child every t/2 years, where t is the average time for a person with a youthful body to get into a fatal situation (currently t is about 1000). Probably there would need to be even more children than that, since some people would not get all the children that they could. Everyone could also get 2 children, though then it would take much longer for the population to stabilize, since each generation would only get smaller by the amount of non-age-related deaths and the amount of people who opt not to have children. But yeah, homicidal maniacs, that's another route.

  30. Given the choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would rather listen to an interview with Dick Cheney than Barack Obama any day of the week.

  31. What a miserable piece of shit Cheney is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine living with such paranoia.

    I remember Nixon had similar tendencies.

    They both serve as good examples of how not to be.

  32. Re:Paranoid? Nope, he's merely one noid. by Ihlosi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Having said that, whose wise idea was it to make a defibrilator that can be remotely accessed wirelessly in the first place?

    Probably someone who thought that sticking a cable through your chest to change the things configuration is an even worse idea.

  33. Empathy motherfucker; find some. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Empathy motherfucker; find some.

  34. Terrorist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That wouldn't be a terrorist. That would be a murderer.

  35. The fact is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The peacemaker was replaced with the new W.O.P.R. model

  36. Patriot == Terrorist In Cheney's Mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nixon thought they were too extreme when they worked for him.
    QED.

  37. Please don't die!! by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    While I know this is far fetched I still hold out hope some day Cheney and friends will held to account for lying to his own people and the world to start a war and war crimes.

    Perhaps by some unexpected political change or a fateful visit to the wrong country where that government has the balls to follow thru on perusing charges.

    It also has to be meaningful if Cheney and pals only live for a year in jail and then die of old age it is far from an ideal situation.

    1. Re:Please don't die!! by mbone · · Score: 1

      I predicted in 2003 it would take until at least 2016 to bring these guys to trial. Still haven't seen any reason to change that yet.

    2. Re:Please don't die!! by koan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The worst of the worst will take office in 2016, Hillary Clinton.

      Hence the never ending "pro female" rhetoric and propaganda oozing out of the usual outlets.

      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  38. Re:Bad thing about advancements in medical technol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The lifespans of these rich, elitist assholes are artificially prolonged.

    How terrible. Far better if the resources were used to artificially prolong the lifespan of some random, insignificant poor person instead. Perhaps some trailer dwelling ham-beast whose greatest contribution to humanity has been squeezing borderline retarded crotch droppings out of her greasy cooter would be a suitable beneficiary.

  39. Pacemaker vs. defibrillator by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 2

    You are describing a *pacemaker*, not a defibrillator.

    Not in this case.

    My sister has an implanted cardiac defibrillator that also functions as a pacemaker. It was my understanding that all implanted defibrillators have this functionality.

    Of course, I could be completely wrong about that. The defibrillator she has replaced a previous pacemaker that was just a pacemaker. We were not informed if there was actually such a thing as a defibrillator that was just a defibrillator because such a device would not have been appropriate for her. For that reason, I may have the wrong impression.

    Suffice it to say, she has a combo device that is always referred to by medical professionals as an "ICD" without mentioning that it also functions as a pacemaker. I assume they all do. If not, I'm sure someone on here more knowledgable than me will correct me.

    1. Re:Pacemaker vs. defibrillator by rkww · · Score: 2

      ICD = Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

      Pacing - a series of low-voltage electrical impulses (paced beats) at a fast rate to try and correct the heart rhythm

      Cardioversion - one or more small electric shocks to try and restore the heart to a normal rhythm

      Defibrillation - one or more larger electric shocks to try and restore the heart to a normal rhythm

    2. Re:Pacemaker vs. defibrillator by Borgmeister · · Score: 1

      Think yours is closer to the mark, but for clarity ICD can also refer to International Classification of Diseases. http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/

      --
      *Insert ridiculous, apparently intelligent but ultimately meaningless phrase here*
  40. Yeah but what about EMP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How's he going to keep safe from an EMP shockwave?

  41. New Heart Device Allows Cheney To Experience Love by JThaddeus · · Score: 4, Funny

    One of my favorite headlines fromThe Onion:
    http://www.theonion.com/articles/new-heart-device-allows-cheney-to-experience-love,2294/

    --
    "Love is a familiar; Love is a devil: there is no evil angel but Love." --William Shakespeare ('Love's Labors Lost')
  42. Re:Bad thing about advancements in medical technol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That person would still be 100 more times a worthy human being as Dick Cheney, or any CEO.

  43. Wireless drivers? by Skiron · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the wireless thing ever turned on properly after he woke up?

  44. Cheney's clueless, it's not that easy by Chewbacon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Classic case of the dumbasses we put in charge who go sticking their fingers in things they know absolutely nothing about. Cheney strikes me as a prepper and we need to keep dipshits like that out of office.

    These devices have to be "woken up" with a sensor placed on the chest. Then it'll communicate with the interrogation equipment which can induces shocks via a defribillation test. The range is limited to about 15 feet. Despite the wireless option being turned off, anyone with the device used to interrogate can still induce a shock with the chest sensor.

    Still, a shock could still be induced without the tech by causing artifact in the leads. Inappropriate shocks have been reported in people operating heavy equipment like jackhammers and chainsaws. So shake the shit out of him and he may get an inappropriate shock. Worst that would happen there is induction of ventricular fibrillation which would only cause an appropriate shock.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    1. Re:Cheney's clueless, it's not that easy by koan · · Score: 1
      --
      "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
    2. Re:Cheney's clueless, it's not that easy by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

      Which still wouldn't have anything to do with wireless interrogation or testing. Unless he's completely dependent on the device, being in complete heartblock, then he'd be fine until he had an arrhythmia requiring a shock.

      --
      Chewbacon
      The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    3. Re:Cheney's clueless, it's not that easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think your reply is in the same context as mine.

    4. Re:Cheney's clueless, it's not that easy by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Cheney a prepper? Hardly. If there's anyone who represents the cigar-smoking, brandy-swilling high-living fat-cat, it's him. If there's any prepping around him, it would be because he pays a staff to do it for him.

  45. Re:So, like, don't start wars you shouldn't, M;K? by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    no skin off his penis. he's rich, bitch! got paid more money from his oil company job while being veep than he was paid to be vice president. and republicans in congress doubled his salary.

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  46. Does his pacemaker also have a special mode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to survive "advanced interrogation techniques" aka Waterboarding? just interested.

  47. Dick by koan · · Score: 1

    That they were actually concerned about this tells you everything you need to know about Dick and American politics.

    They know they are criminals so they live in fear.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  48. Re:So, like, don't start wars you shouldn't, M;K? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Al Qaida started the war. They bombed two US embassies in Africa, killing hundreds and wounding a thousand. They bombed the US Navy destroyer the USS Cole, nearly sinking it. They attacked on 9/11 and kill 3,000. Can we stop forgetting that, mm kay?

  49. Entirely reasonable by cfalcon · · Score: 1

    You can disagree with Cheney's politics- I certainly do.

    But this is entirely reasonable for him to take. It prevents assassination and blackmail attempts being launched in a potentially trivial fashion. As was said above, why would you want an off switch? And if you or I can personally justify it, we'd probably not be able to as vice president.

  50. CHENEY IS "TERROR'S BEST FRIEND" by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    They'd NEVER attack Cheney!
    Keeping him alive at all costs, would be the best thing for "Terrorists", ever. Kill the Cheney's in this world, and these "terrorists" have no cause for which to exist.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:CHENEY IS "TERROR'S BEST FRIEND" by rtb61 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This only real speaks of Darth Cheney's extreme fear of death. It's hanging around all those right wing pseudo Christian freaks. It must be festering in the back of his diseased mind, "If there is a hell, I'll be really, really roasting for ever". Over a million dead to feed his greed, youch, when it comes to what might happen after death, it certainly unlikely to be good for him and it's hardly surprising he is desperate to put it off for as long as possible. Leaving in fear like that has to suck and likely is just a taste of his future.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:CHENEY IS "TERROR'S BEST FRIEND" by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      He is already dead.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  51. Re:So, like, don't start wars you shouldn't, M;K? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, those damn Iraqies. Not even counting them. It was all fabricate with lie$. Yeloow cake! From the belgium congo mind you!

  52. Barry Eisler - Rain Fall by fear025 · · Score: 1

    This was a technique used by fictional assassin John Rain in Barry Eisler's "Rain Fall".
    The assassin got right up to his victim in the subway and placed a device that would trigger the pacemaker on a delay.

  53. Define "terrorists" ???? by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

    Anyone who offed Dick Cheney would be a hero of democracy and humanity, not a "terrorist"!

    1. Re:Define "terrorists" ???? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      If its not posted on YouTube, it didn't happen.

  54. Re:Paranoid? Nope, he's merely one noid. by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

    Hold on a second, Morty Zuckerman's US NEWS and World Report ran a cover touting Dick(head) Cheney as a "tough guy".

    Are you doubting Morty Zuckerman? He is on the Trilateral Commission, after all......

  55. Good Job Anonymous. by Seumas · · Score: 1

    You really dropped the ball, Anonymous.

  56. Medical Device Attacks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, is this what the Tea Party wants stopped so badly?

    It's "Medical Device Attacks" they're worried about, and on Mr. Cheney?

    Here I'd been thinking it was that item in the tax code that the industry lobbies tart up to repeal every-single-damn-year
    and are willing to shut down the government as a tactic (they did get the medical device taxes cut in half a few years ago).

  57. Just wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wait until He farts, the wireless thingy will turn on by itself, then he/it can be owned. Only problem, paper toilet and dildos turn off again the thingy on his heart.

  58. Conspiracy Theory Theater by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    A possible movie concept, and game:

    The transmitter was put back in the pace maker. It is tuned so that every time one passes by a Red Box the pace maker starts playing "Poker Face", acustic version, by Lady Gaga; downloaded from The Pirate Bay.

    This turns out to be the reason why Snowden left the NSA, which is verifiable on WikiLeaks.

  59. I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know Cheney HAS NO heart....

  60. Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hacker dies mysteriously days before describing pacemaker exploit:

    http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/one-last-interview-with-barnaby-jack

  61. Re:New Heart Device Allows Cheney To Experience Lo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheney experiences love alright - his love of authoritarian power and the ongoing destruction of the US as a democracy.

  62. That's disturbing. by detritus. · · Score: 1

    What's next, admission that Barnaby Jack was classified as a foreign terrorist and assassinated?
    I wouldn't be the least bit surprised since the term hacking is now becoming synonymous with terrorism.

  63. Murder is not terrorism by InPursuitOfTruth · · Score: 1

    Nor is assassination. Glad to see /. use the right word. Are we ever going to hear a politician speak intelligently?

  64. Re:Dick Cheney says by Richy_T · · Score: 1

    You have to guess that Dick Cheney is American? That must be some rock you've been hiding under.

  65. Nonsense by happyhamster · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are mixing things up, and you are incorrect. The plan was to take the Caucasus oil fields [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Caucasus], not Ural. There was no way Germans could take Ural in 1943, and there was no oil there anyway.

    The real story is that Hitler needed to take Caucasus oil to keep his war machine running. He had to take Stalingrad to keep his flanks safe. Look at the map [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/dd/Eastern_Front_1942-05_to_1942-11.png]. It wasn't a detour, Hitler had to take Stalingrad to keep the front stable, and he failed. He failed due to his underestimation of Russian heroism and overestimation of Wehrmacht.

    1. Re:Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He failed due to his underestimation of RUSSIAN HEROISM PRODDED BY STALIN'S DIRECT DEATH THREATS and overestimation of Wehrmacht.

    2. Re:Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were some weather problems as well.

  66. Ridiculous... by powerlinekid · · Score: 2

    Terrorists obviously know the best way to terrorize Americans is to keep people like Cheney alive.

    --

    can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    1. Re:Ridiculous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The We the terrorists as the NSA like to think of us also know Cheney's a pussy he had no qualms about sending other people out to die for his greed\belief system.

  67. A lot of you guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are scum. You are vile and so smart you're fucking idiots. Dick Chaney is the fucking man, and you're a fucking loser.

  68. Murderer, not terrorist by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    Killing Dick Cheney would be a murder, not terrorism. Terrorism is supposed to scare people, and I see nothing scaring with the idea Dick Cheney could be killed with a "weapon" that would not affect me.

  69. ... terrified of a built in personal off switch by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1
    --
    If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
  70. Re:Paranoid? Nope, he's merely one noid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "tough guy".

    that's a good one, even satan is laughing, whats that my dark overlord? He wants me to ask if he struck down Cheney would the US go after him as a terrorist?

  71. Reduced Blood Flow To Brain Source Of Paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Cheney's paranoia from his reduced blood flow to his brain?

    Better yet, the physical and psychological state of candidates for high public office should be considered as an eligibility requirement prior to political party endorsement.

    We must use the Obamacare law against the psychopaths who like Cheney and Obama will try to gain political office to destroy the country.

  72. I would have done that too! by stkris · · Score: 1

    All jokes aside - who thought it was a good idea to use wifi to control the human equivalent of overclocking? Sure - people can be killed with RF-guns that destroys pacemakers or even with old fashioned guns or poison and in many other ways. But why add another possibility to the mix? Also given all the jokes on this topic (thought I was on reddit for a while) I'd say that Cheney have good reason to belive someone might not like him. But then I am a stupid foreigner and you are possibly making all these jokes to show the man that you love him very much.

  73. In dutch we would say by anonieuweling · · Score: 1

    'zo de waard is vertrouwt hij zijn gasten'

    or something like: as does the subject trust [something], so does he trust others

  74. Heartless Dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must have been watching "Heartland."

  75. Miss-information is at it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a ICD-Defibrilator as well. Yes the thing can be accessed wirelessly, once you place a receiver over the area, sync the device, AND have the proper equipment to interface the specific device. How else do you expect to access something implanted internally without cutting someone open to connect to it and adjust the programming.

    There is NO love lost on "The Dick" but to make sensational claims about a trained professional being able to access a defib wirelessly is like running in circles and shouting "the sky is falling! the sky is falling"

    Take a chill pill .. or breath into this paper bag for a bit

    1. Re:Miss-information is at it again by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

      I have a ICD-Defibrilator as well. Yes the thing can be accessed wirelessly, once you place a receiver over the area,...

      The ICD in my sister did not require a receiver placed over the area. The tech accessed it wirelessly from across the room. It was a small room, granted, but she and her equipment were several feet away.

      That was the surprise. We had both thought that holding that puck over the area was required to access the device. We didn't know it could be done without her knowledge or consent from more-than-handshake distance. For that reason, I don't think Cheney is paranoid to have the wireless access to his device somehow limited.

      I never said the sky is falling. We were just momentarily and, I think, justifiably startled.

  76. wouldn't a radiation source be... by JamieIanMacgregor · · Score: 1

    an easier method to kill said device?

  77. I don't blame him for turning off wireless... by IDtheTarget · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't really like the Republican party any more. They're running the country into the ground. But listening to how hateful the liberals are, and how they wish death to their political opponents (see list below), I can't really support them either. I don't want to be a member of the party of hate. So for now I'll be an independent.

    That being said, if even a few of the below links are accurate, wouldn't you protect yourself from the left, who profess to want their political opponents to die?

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyharnden/9757837/

    http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2011/07/16/dan-savage-hbos-real-time-i-wish-republicans-were-all-f-king-dead

    http://www.examiner.com/article/liberal-talker-mike-malloy-says-he-wants-gop-literally-dead

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItcqrHLZGDg&feature=player_embedded#!

    http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/media-research-center-documents-liberal-death-wishes-against-conservatives

    http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/the-dark-side-of-liberalism-death-threats-to-conservatives-and-racist-threats/question-3628447/

  78. New Heart Keeps Dick Alive, Damn ...! by OldHawk777 · · Score: 0

    Damn he is looking healthier, has amazing compatibility luck, could there be anyone lower on any recipient list. His ability to buy a heart as needed, wow, I wish all US could get such good affordable medical care. At his age being on the top of a transplant list in the USA is unusual, maybe he went to China to get a transplant. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/24/dick-cheney-heart-transplant_n_1377487.html
    Did anyone investigate, or ask during any interview?

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  79. Wireless, protects himself never US. by OldHawk777 · · Score: 1

    GOP/TP started a death-threat pissing war in 1980, liberals finally reply in the uncivil-pissing-war battles during the PBO decade 2008. Now, GOP/TP wealth-elitist and minions whine about US Liberals, Independents, and Patriots being mean to GOP/TP, because of truthiness white-trash dogma and commentaries. It is time to stand against the evils of GOP/TP wealth-elitist and minions hate, lies, and bigotry. http://www.awolbush.com/whoserved.html

    I have not forgotten the past three decades of GOP/TP politician/members fear-mongering antics and hate speech. TREASON/CRIMES: Iraq, criminal deletion of Whitehouse email/message traffic, outing CIA agents ....

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  80. Mo-Money, Mo-Money .... by OldHawk777 · · Score: 0

    GOP/TP wealth-elitist and minions can never have enough money. Mo-money will always justify killing by proxy/surrogates. Using our USA Warriors for global expression of GOP/TP wealth-elitist and minions agenda/dogma affects US all like a cancer rotting US from within our borders, laws, and institutions. GOP/TP wealth-elitist and minions are the domestic enemy looking to topple The USA Constitution and enslave US The People.

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  81. Re:Paranoid? Nope, he's merely one noid. by waddgodd · · Score: 1

    Having said that, whose wise idea was it to make a defibrilator that can be remotely accessed wirelessly in the first place?

    Probably someone who thought that sticking a cable through your chest to change the things configuration is an even worse idea.

    Ahh, then not Cheney, who had his implant broken precisely so that would be the only way to do it...

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you
  82. Re:Paranoid? Nope, he's merely one noid. by waddgodd · · Score: 1

    Not good enough for Cheney apparently

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you