Especially in today's world where those with the loudest voice can demonise any nation they deem necessary for their own political, national , military and financial gain.
That's what Bushy does.
The laws, which are seemingly being directed by big business in the US, are fucked.
If the US can force a South American nation to hand over 2 US soldiers arrested for cocaine smuggling, but demand that an Australian be handed over to them over fucking piracy, just demonstrates how governments are there to prop up companies.
It's ok to murder your wife, you might get a few years, but damn if you rob a major company or bank. Kil your wife - your removing one person from the system, less burden. Rob a bank - your stealing money from the dictators.
That's how things are turning out to be.
That's the whole point. Her integrity has been called into question by her being let go of, and it's only a natural step to pull her articles. Doesn't matter who gave the go ahead for them to be published in the first instance, that could be part of any investigation into the whole debacle.
You and I might discuss the libellous nature of her articles in here, we may even come to our own conclusions, but we don't have the burden of being the owners of that publishing group. They have done the right thing by removing her pieces until a satisfactory conclusion can be reached.
No. The media, whether print or online, has always had the power to pull articles they consider unsafe, and have done so since the dawn of reporting. Usually in print, if the story has been published, there will be a retraction. Online is slightly different in that you can remove past articles when in question. I think it's only right that they did so in this case. If one of her latest articles is near-libellous and inflammatory, then it brings into question her past writings.
Her integrity has been compromised, so it's only prudent they at least pull them until they can verify the contents. You wouldn't want any material that might be months old which could be deemed as being libellous.
Don't know about you guys, but I'm almost creaming myself at the thought of the Korn shell being included.;)
The other 199 features can go take a hike.
Jeez, people scurring around the law to prove this is ok, that is not. What if some think the laws are fucked? What if some wish to voice that and stand against these ever-changing laws which are writtenpurely for the benefits of the few in power?
Fuck the laws, screw the FBI and their scare tactics.
I say stand up against his current trend of some to bully those into following corrupt laws.
Re:HAHAHA dead Jews are funny.... ASSHOLE!!!!!!!
on
LokiTorrent Shut Down
·
· Score: 0
It's precisely the reason why we should be making comparisons. If we forget the evils, and the course of actions that led to this evils; then we will be forever doomed to go down them again.
What might start out as benign, could very well end up as being inhumane, you just don';t know.
Today's gross violation of human rights in Gitmo bay, could be the precursor to nation-wide mass detentions over anything the Gov. decides.
America: Let's give those Iranians some American freedoms. First,, we'll bomb you, then give you it.
Iranians: Um, we don't want yuor freedoms, we're happy being Iranians., Whatever happened to you respecting the rights of others?
America: How dare you Iranians speak your own mind, we don't want the likes of you dictating to yourselves what you want. We're going to cut you of at the mouth by not allowing you to speak for yourselves.
Iranians: Fuck off you dim-witted cunts, yuo thikn the rest of the world are as stupid as Bush followers?
It's merely the US exercising the old propoganda machine in the run up to invading the country. They need to show us simpletons how evil those Iranians are, and thus the need to liberate them from some mythical oppresive regime.
Yeah right. Just more crap from Bush Co. Iran is not some backwards natoin that needs rescuing at the hands of bloody Americans. Jeez, how gullible are we, that we allow our Government to hood-wink us into buying this crap?
If I was Iran, I'd do a first strike against US interests,before the bastards come to me.
Slashdot Mirror
Especially in today's world where those with the loudest voice can demonise any nation they deem necessary for their own political, national , military and financial gain. That's what Bushy does.
Ever thought that these countries aren't really terrorist nations at all, but simply labelled by a few countries because it serves their own agenda?
The laws, which are seemingly being directed by big business in the US, are fucked. If the US can force a South American nation to hand over 2 US soldiers arrested for cocaine smuggling, but demand that an Australian be handed over to them over fucking piracy, just demonstrates how governments are there to prop up companies. It's ok to murder your wife, you might get a few years, but damn if you rob a major company or bank. Kil your wife - your removing one person from the system, less burden. Rob a bank - your stealing money from the dictators. That's how things are turning out to be.
That's the whole point. Her integrity has been called into question by her being let go of, and it's only a natural step to pull her articles. Doesn't matter who gave the go ahead for them to be published in the first instance, that could be part of any investigation into the whole debacle. You and I might discuss the libellous nature of her articles in here, we may even come to our own conclusions, but we don't have the burden of being the owners of that publishing group. They have done the right thing by removing her pieces until a satisfactory conclusion can be reached.
No. The media, whether print or online, has always had the power to pull articles they consider unsafe, and have done so since the dawn of reporting. Usually in print, if the story has been published, there will be a retraction. Online is slightly different in that you can remove past articles when in question. I think it's only right that they did so in this case. If one of her latest articles is near-libellous and inflammatory, then it brings into question her past writings.
Her integrity has been compromised, so it's only prudent they at least pull them until they can verify the contents. You wouldn't want any material that might be months old which could be deemed as being libellous.
Don't know about you guys, but I'm almost creaming myself at the thought of the Korn shell being included. ;)
The other 199 features can go take a hike.
Jeez, people scurring around the law to prove this is ok, that is not. What if some think the laws are fucked? What if some wish to voice that and stand against these ever-changing laws which are writtenpurely for the benefits of the few in power? Fuck the laws, screw the FBI and their scare tactics. I say stand up against his current trend of some to bully those into following corrupt laws.
It's precisely the reason why we should be making comparisons. If we forget the evils, and the course of actions that led to this evils; then we will be forever doomed to go down them again. What might start out as benign, could very well end up as being inhumane, you just don';t know. Today's gross violation of human rights in Gitmo bay, could be the precursor to nation-wide mass detentions over anything the Gov. decides.
Neither is America a "bastion of freedom". I just love these erroneous and blind opinions about Iran, mind you, it serves the Bush cause quite well.
America: Let's give those Iranians some American freedoms. First,, we'll bomb you, then give you it. Iranians: Um, we don't want yuor freedoms, we're happy being Iranians., Whatever happened to you respecting the rights of others? America: How dare you Iranians speak your own mind, we don't want the likes of you dictating to yourselves what you want. We're going to cut you of at the mouth by not allowing you to speak for yourselves. Iranians: Fuck off you dim-witted cunts, yuo thikn the rest of the world are as stupid as Bush followers?
It's merely the US exercising the old propoganda machine in the run up to invading the country. They need to show us simpletons how evil those Iranians are, and thus the need to liberate them from some mythical oppresive regime. Yeah right. Just more crap from Bush Co. Iran is not some backwards natoin that needs rescuing at the hands of bloody Americans. Jeez, how gullible are we, that we allow our Government to hood-wink us into buying this crap? If I was Iran, I'd do a first strike against US interests,before the bastards come to me.
So what do I do to block IP ranges on a *nix computer? I've got my blocklist (peerguardian), so is it just a case of adding the addresses to ipfw?
Sounds like living in a banana Repbulic.