The walls might be square, the windows might all be the same size (so I coud buy blinds that fit), I wouldn't have wall outlets on the same circuit with the lights, the basement plumbing for a toilet would be useable because it wouldn't be too close to the wall, I wouldn't have two different circuits feeding one wall outlet, and I could put furniture in the little bedroom (can't get anything larger than a twin bed through the door in the hall).
Just as people reach a saturation point where there is little they are interested in buying, eventually they reach the saturation point where they aren't interested in more, even if it's free. How many thousands of songs do you listen to in a day? How much disk space are you willing to commit to something that you NEVER listent to?
The only solution to declining consumption is something novell and attractive that has value.
Intelligent people of any faith (or not) will wonder and try to fit new knowledge into their world view.
Close minded people of any faith (or not) will react with fear, skepticism, denial and blame.
IF God exists (and the evidence I see supports that belief), his creativity and ability to manage the universe(s) will be little affected by what we (humans on the earth) do or do not believe. To me it seems irrational to believe in the creator of the earth and life upon it and then be unable to accept that he could do the same more than once.
No wise scientist will affix himself upon a theory to the point that it (in his mind) cannot be altered by additional information and evidence. Likewise, no wise "religionist" will put himself in the position of believing that everything God has done or knows has been shared with us, nor that what has been shared has been explained to us any better than we are capable of accepting or understanding. Just as scientists wish to be accorded the opportunity to revise theories and explanations, religionists should be willing to reinterpret and revise their understandings in the light of additional truth, even if it comes from a scientist.
Ads? What ads ... are there ads in my browser?
on
Why Do You Block Ads?
·
· Score: 1
Slashdot Mirror
The walls might be square, the windows might all be the same size (so I coud buy blinds that fit), I wouldn't have wall outlets on the same circuit with the lights, the basement plumbing for a toilet would be useable because it wouldn't be too close to the wall, I wouldn't have two different circuits feeding one wall outlet, and I could put furniture in the little bedroom (can't get anything larger than a twin bed through the door in the hall).
Global warming, receding ice pack, but the ocean is falling. Someone has a serious water retension problem.
Sounds like a spell-checker/grammar-checker problem.
Just as people reach a saturation point where there is little they are interested in buying, eventually they reach the saturation point where they aren't interested in more, even if it's free. How many thousands of songs do you listen to in a day? How much disk space are you willing to commit to something that you NEVER listent to? The only solution to declining consumption is something novell and attractive that has value.
Intelligent people of any faith (or not) will wonder and try to fit new knowledge into their world view. Close minded people of any faith (or not) will react with fear, skepticism, denial and blame. IF God exists (and the evidence I see supports that belief), his creativity and ability to manage the universe(s) will be little affected by what we (humans on the earth) do or do not believe. To me it seems irrational to believe in the creator of the earth and life upon it and then be unable to accept that he could do the same more than once. No wise scientist will affix himself upon a theory to the point that it (in his mind) cannot be altered by additional information and evidence. Likewise, no wise "religionist" will put himself in the position of believing that everything God has done or knows has been shared with us, nor that what has been shared has been explained to us any better than we are capable of accepting or understanding. Just as scientists wish to be accorded the opportunity to revise theories and explanations, religionists should be willing to reinterpret and revise their understandings in the light of additional truth, even if it comes from a scientist.
I simply don't notice them anymore.
GTA:SA was banned at my house BEFORE the pornographic sequences were uncovered. Junkman1989